Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection by using pyloriset EIA-G and EIA-A for detection of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies.

We evaluated the performance of new enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits (Pyloriset; Orion Corporation, Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland) for the detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies to Helicobacter pylori in serum. Serum samples from 195 patients with upper abdominal complaints were collected. Biopsy specimens of the gastric mucosae were taken for histological analysis and bacterial culture. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, and efficacy of the Pyloriset EIA-G in detecting IgG antibodies to H. pylori were 92, 84, 88, 90, and 89%, respectively, when compared with those of the reference methods used. The corresponding data for detection of IgA antibodies were 80, 89, 89, 79, and 84%, respectively. The overall prevalence of defined H. pylori positivity was 54%. Moreover, the antibody tests showed a very good correlation with the biopsy findings. IgG antibodies were found in 93% of sera from patients with documented gastritis and H. pylori positivity, whereas only 4% of the sera from patients with documented gastritis and H. pylori-negative patients was positive. The results obtained for IgA antibodies were 81 and 6%, respectively. We conclude that the Pyloriset EIA-G, the test for IgG antibodies, is a good and reliable test for the detection of antibodies to H. pylori and as an indication of H. pylori infection. The determination of IgA antibodies may be used as a test that complements the IgG antibody assay.     

A practical single sample dry latex agglutination test for Helicobacter pylori antibody detection.

Assessment of a single serum sample for Helicobacter pylori antibodies is frequently requested in routine diagnostic laboratories. Current enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits are not ideal for testing small numbers of serum samples and some have low sensitivities, specificities or large grey zones. A panel of 90 serum samples from patients who had presented for routine upper endoscopy was used to compare three kits for the detection of H pylori antibodies: (1) Pyloriset Dry, total antibody latex agglutination, Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland; (2) Pyloriset enzyme immunoassay (EIA), IgG ELISA, Orion; and (3) Hel-p, IgG ELISA, Amrad, Kew, Victoria, Australia. Diagnosis of H pylori positivity was made if culture results and either rapid urease test or histopathology were positive. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value for each test was as follows: Orion: latex 93.3%, 95.6%, 95.5%, 93.3%, respectively; Orion: EIA-G 84.4%, 97.8%, 97.4%, 84.4%, respectively; and Amrad: EIA-G 100%, 88.9%, 90%, 100%, respectively. The latex test performed better than the EIAs with respect to sensitivity and specificity.     

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in adult and pediatric patients by using Pyloriset, a rapid latex agglutination test.

Pyloriset (Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland) is a rapid antibody test using latex particles coated with acid-extracted antigen of Helicobacter pylori. We evaluated its ability to predict infection in 100 adult patients and 50 pediatric patients referred for gastric endoscopy. Sixty of 65 H. pylori-infected adults were correctly identified by the test. There were 12 false-positive and 5 false-negative reactions seen. Pyloriset had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 66%. The positive predictive value was 83% and the negative predictive value 82%. In contrast, sensitivity dropped to 36% in the pediatric patients and the positive predictive value was only 40%. Pyloriset could become an important alternative to other more time-consuming diagnostic tests for H. pylori-infected adult patients but is inadequate for diagnosis of pediatric H. pylori infection.     

Evaluation of two commercial enzyme immunoassays, testing immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA responses, for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children

Serological testing to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection in children is still controversial, although commonly used in clinical practice. We compared the immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA results of two commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Pyloriset IgG and IgA and Enzygnost II IgG and IgA) for 175 children with abdominal symptoms divided into three age groups (0 to < or =6 years, n = 47; >6 to < or =12 years, n = 77; >12 years, n = 51). A child was considered H. pylori infected if at least two of three tests (histology, rapid urease test, 13C-urea breath test) or culture were positive and noninfected if all results were concordantly negative. Of 175 children, 93 (53%) were H. pylori negative and 82 were H. pylori positive. With the recommended cutoff values, the overall specificity was excellent for all four EIAs (95.7 to 97.8%) regardless of age. Sensitivity varied markedly between tests and was 92.7, 70.7, 47.5, and 24.4% for Enzygnost II IgG, Pyloriset IgG, Enzygnost II IgA, and Pyloriset IgA, respectively. Sensitivity was low in the youngest age group (25 to 33.3%), except for Enzygnost II IgG (91.6%). Receiver-operating curve analyses revealed that lower cutoff values would improve the accuracy of all of the tests except Enzygnost II IgG. Measurement of specific IgA, in addition to IgG, antibodies hardly improved the sensitivity. The specificity of commercial serological tests is high in children when the cutoff values obtained from adults are used. In contrast, sensitivity is variable, with a strong age dependence in some, but not all, tests. We speculate that young children may have a different immune response to H. pylori, with preferable responses to certain antigens, as well as lower titers than adults. The Pyloriset test may fail to recognize these specific antibodies.     

Evaluation of the performance of commercial test kits for detection of Helicobacter pylori antibodies in serum.

We have compared the sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values of three commercial serological assays for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. A qualitative latex method (Pyloriset; Orion Diagnostics), a semiquantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (GAP test IgG; Bio-Rad), and a quantiative ELISA (Helico-G; Porton Cambridge) were used in 109 untreated dyspeptic patients. The presence of H. pylori was established when the results of culture and/or histology of the gastric biopsies taken were positive. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was 62% (52% in 42 patients younger than 45 years of age and 69% in 67 patients older than 45 years of age). Sensitivities and specificities were 68 and 76% for Pyloriset, 89 and 77% for GAP test IgG, and 82 and 83% for Helico-G. The positive predictive values for all three tests were between 85 and 90%. The predictive values for the absence of disease with a negative result were 62, 82, and 74% for Pyloriset, the GAP test, and Helico-G, respectively. With Helico-G in the younger group (less than 45 years), sensitivity significantly lower (71 versus 87%) and a positive predictive value lower than those for the older group (greater than 45 years) were found. Either the sensitivities and specificities of commercial methods for the measurement of antibodies to H. pylori in serum must be improved or the relationship between the presence of antibodies and the presence of bacteria in the stomach at the time of investigation is too weak to allow the use of serological techniques instead of culture and histological investigation of gastric biopsy material.     

Use of serum-specific immunoglobulins A and G for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with chronic gastritis by immunoblot analysis.

Multiple invasive and noninvasive tests for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection are available. The current "gold standard" for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection requires histology and the rapid urease test. Our aim was to test the performance of immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgG immunoblot assays in comparison with that of the gold standard tests for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Ninety patients who underwent gastroscopy were analyzed in a prospective study. Fifty-nine of them were defined to be H. pylori positive by the gold standard tests. The IgA and IgG immunoblot assays correctly identified H. pylori infection in 17 and 58 of these patients, respectively, indicating that determination of IgA antibodies seems to be of low diagnostic value for H. pylori infection. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of the IgG immunoblot assay were 98 and 71%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 87 and 96%, respectively. Therefore, the IgG immunoblot assay proved to be a sensitive and useful, noninvasive test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.     

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in adults and children by using the Malakit Helicobacter pylori, a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Malakit Helicobacter pylori (Biolab, Limal, Belgium) is a second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection. We evaluated its ability to diagnose H. pylori infection in 489 asymptomatic pregnant women, 427 asymptomatic children, and 95 symptomatic children. 87 asymptomatic adults (17.8%), 31 asymptomatic children (7.3%), and 27 symptomatic children (28.4%) were seropositive. We observed an increase in H. pylori infection with age. 13C-urea breath tests were performed for all seropositive and 100 randomly selected seronegative asymptomatic adults. They were also performed for all seropositive and 65 randomly chosen seronegative asymptomatic children. Breath tests were positive for 86 of 87 (98.9%) seropositive adults, 30 of 31 seropositive children (96.8%), and no seronegative individual. Compared with those of culture, the sensitivity and specificity of the Malakit Helicobacter pylori were both 96%. We conclude that the Malakit Helicobacter pylori is equally suitable for adults and children. Therefore, this ELISA can be proposed as an important alternative to other more time-consuming and/or more expensive diagnostic tests for the detection of H. pylori.     

Evaluation of Pyloriset Dry, a new rapid agglutination test for Helicobacter pylori antibody detection.

We evaluated the performance of a new latex agglutination test, Pyloriset Dry (Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland), in the simultaneous detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM antibodies to Helicobacter pylori and compared it with that of the Pyloristat test (BioWhittaker, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France), an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detecting IgG to H. pylori, for 96 untreated dyspeptic patients who had undergone gastroduodenal endoscopy. Infection was diagnosed in 56 cases by positive culture and/or positive Giemsa stain and rapid urease test (antral biopsies) and was associated with chronic gastritis in 52 patients. Forty noninfected patients did not have chronic gastritis. The sensitivity of Pyloriset Dry was 91.1%. The sensitivity of Pyloristat was 91.1 or 82.1%, depending on whether equivocal results were considered positive or negative, respectively. Both tests had a specificity of 87.5%. Their performances were not statistically different. Thus, Pyloriset Dry is an alternative to serological tests for adults, particularly when a small number of serum samples has to be tested.     

Serological detection of Helicobacter pylori antibodies in children and their parents.

The antibody response to Helicobacter pylori was examined in 56 children (ages 5 to 18) to determine whether serological tests can be used for diagnosis. Twenty-four children (43%) were H. pylori positive and 32 children (57%) were H. pylori negative by culture and histological examination of endoscopic biopsy specimens. The immune response was also examined in 39 nonendoscoped parents of the children. H. pylori-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies were detected by the flow microsphere immunofluorescent assay (FMIA). IgG was also detected by using the Pyloristat enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the FMIA for IgG were 100, 97, 96, and 100%, respectively. The respective values for the Pyloristat ELISA for IgG were 96, 94, 92, and 97%. The respective values for the FMIA for IgA were 50, 100, 100, and 73%. Both assays identified the same 19 parents as IgG positive, while FMIA identified 17 of the 19 parents as IgA positive.     

Serodiagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) have been developed to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection. However, the methods are not standardized. We therefore prospectively evaluated the sensitivities and specificities of ELISAs developed in the United States and the United Kingdom in a study population comprising 41 consecutive symptomatic outpatients and 35 volunteers. At endoscopy, multiple biopsies were obtained for histology and culture and stained sections were graded for chronic gastritis, active chronic gastritis, and density of H. pylori. Serum samples were analyzed for H. pylori by ELISA. The first set of assays for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA used a pool of sonicated isolates of H. pylori from five patients in the United States (antigen A). The second set of assays, developed in the United Kingdom, used three different antigens: antigen 1, an acid-extractable surface antigen; antigen 2, an acid-extractable antigen from an aflagellate variant; and antigen 3, a urease-containing fraction. Cutoff scores for positive results were determined a priori on the basis of previous serological studies. There was close agreement between histology and culture. In the study population, 36% of the individuals were H. pylori positive. The diagnostic value of the different ELISAs were highly comparable, and the crude antigens performed as well as the more purified antigens. The antigen A IgG had a sensitivity and specificity of 96 and 94%, respectively; the values for antigen 1 were 93 and 96%, respectively. The antigen A IgA and antigen 3 assays were the least sensitive tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Antibody to cytotoxin in infection by Helicobacter pylori.

Gastrointestinal disease and colonization by Helicobacter pylori were determined in 36 asymptomatic volunteers and 30 symptomatic individuals undergoing endoscopy and biopsy. Serum antibody immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA to H. pylori were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Serum antibody to a cytotoxin produced by H. pylori was detected with a neutralization assay. Serum IgG was 95% predictive of infection by H. pylori, and serum IgA was 88% predictive. Antibody to the cytotoxin was detected in 12 of 18 infected individuals. Antibody to the cytotoxin was a highly specific (96%), but not a very sensitive (67%), indicator of infection by H. pylori. The neutralization assay was 87% predictive of infection. These data confirm the diagnostic value of serum antibody to H. pylori for the detection of infection. The toxin-neutralizing activity of sera from individuals infected with H. pylori suggests that the cytotoxin is produced in vivo. It may therefore contribute to disease associated with H. pylori.     

Salivary immunoglobulin G assay to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection in children.

An in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for measurement of Helicobacter pylori-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA in saliva was evaluated by comparison with histopathologic (Giemsa staining) and biochemical (urease quick test) examination of gastric biopsy specimens obtained from 112 children referred for diagnostic gastroscopy. Serum H. pylori IgG was also measured in a subgroup of 50 children by the same ELISA. Salivary H. pylori IgG levels were significantly higher in H. pylori-positive (n = 57) than in H. pylori-negative (n = 55) children (P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the salivary IgG test were 93 and 82%, respectively; the positive and negative predictive values were 84 and 92%, respectively; and the accuracy was 87.5%. Salivary H. pylori IgA did not distinguish H. pylori-positive from H. pylori-negative children. The performance of serum H. pylori IgG was slightly (3 to 6%) better than that of salivary H. pylori IgG. The salivary IgG test can be considered a useful tool for the screening of H. pylori infection in children.     

Comparison of commercial diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori antibodies.

A number of serological tests measuring the presence of Helicobacter pylori-specific serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) are now commercially available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of five commercial H. pylori antibody tests: GAP-IgG (Biomerica), HELpTEST (AMRAD, Kew, Victoria, Australia), HELICO-G (Porton Cambridge), Pyloriset (Orion Diagnostica), and ROCHE (Roche Diagnostics). A total of 162 subjects presenting for routine upper endoscopy were studied. H. pylori was diagnosed if culture, histology, or both were positive. Ten milliliters of venous blood was collected at the time of endoscopy for serological assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of each test (GAP-IgG, HELpTEST, HELICO-G, Pyloriset, and ROCHE) were as follows: 83 and 79%, 92 and 77%, 86 and 65%, 89 and 56%, and 98 and 69%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 97 and 83%, 90 and 91%, 76 and 83%, 68 and 84%, and 86 and 97%, respectively. The specificity of most tests increased by approximately 10% when sera from subjects less than 45 years old were examined. The number of sera falling into the grey zone for each test (an indeterminate result with respect to H. pylori status) varied between 2.5 and 19%. This study highlights the need for all serological kits to be independently evaluated on the population to be studied by testing against a microbiologically defined panel of H. pylori-positive and -negative sera.     

Evaluation of the Helicobacter pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test in routine clinical practice--is it patient-friendly?

A new immunoassay has been developed to detect the presence of Helicobacter pylori antigens in stool specimens. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy and utility of the H. pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test in routine clinical practice. Dyspeptic patients undergoing endoscopy were studied. H. pylori status was defined before treatment by CLOtest and histology, and by 13C urea breath test (UBT) after eradication therapy. A standard universal container was provided for stool collection and the HpSA test was performed by an investigator blind to the results of the other diagnostic tests. Patients also provided a venous blood sample prior to endoscopy for H. pylori serology. Sixty patients (30 M : 30 F: mean age 47 yr) were enrolled in the study. The pretreatment sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the HpSA test were respectively, 93%, 94%, 96%, and 90%. Twenty five patients returned for post treatment 13CUBT, but only 14 (56%) provided a stool sample for analysis. The post treatment sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the HpSA test were respectively, 67%, 100%, 67%, and 92%. The HpSA test was negative in 19% of the patients found positive for anti-H. pylori antibodies on serology testing. All H. pylori antibody-negative patients had a negative HpSA test. Our results suggest that the HpSA test provides accurate pretreatment diagnosis of H. pylori infection but the reliability of the test after treatment is uncertain. A potential problem with the HpSA test appears to be patient reluctance about stool handling and this could prove a significant obstacle to patient compliance and the acceptability of the test in everyday clinical practice.     

Evaluation of a commercial ELISA for serodiagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

A commercial ELISA for the detection of Helicobacter pylori IgG antibodies was evaluated using serum from 242 patients attending an endoscopy clinic. The efficacy of the ELISA was assessed in relation to the histological detection of H pylori on antral mucosal biopsy specimens. In patients under 61 years of age (n = 138) the ELISA was 97.5% sensitive and 85.5% specific for H pylori infection, with a positive predictive value of 91% and a negative predictive value of 96%. Over the whole group the sensitivity of the ELISA was 93.8% and the specificity 79.3%. The positive predictive value and negative predictive values were, respectively, 90% and 87%. These results suggest that the Bio-Rad GAP IgG H pylori ELISA is suitable for serodiagnosis of H pylori infections for most clinical purposes and thus makes H pylori serology available to routine diagnostic laboratories.     

Serologic Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Outpatients Aged 45 Years or Less

The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Helicobacter pylori was studied in 145 consecutive outpatients aged 45 years or less referred for gastroscopy. Helicobacter pylori infection can be detected by serological tests, including rapid whole-blood tests. The low prevalence of the disease in young people may have a negative effect on the positive predictive value of a test. In this study, the presence of Helicobacter pylori was assessed by a biopsy urease test and histological examination, and by several serological tests: a rapid whole-blood test on fingerstick blood, a latex agglutination serum test, a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) test, and an in-house EIA for detection of antibodies of both the IgG and IgA classes. Helicobacter pylori infection was diagnosed with invasive tests in 21 (14.5%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the EIA-based tests, compared to histological examination, were 100%, 96-97%, 81-84%, and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the latex agglutination test was 78%, whereas it was only 47% for the whole-blood rapid test used. Although the results of the whole-blood rapid test were unsatisfactory, the quantitative EIA-based tests could reliably detect Helicobacter pylori among young patients, in whom the prevalence of the infection is low.     

Detection of Helicobacter pylori Antibodies in a Pediatric Population: Comparison of Three Commercially Available Serological Tests and One In-House Enzyme Immunoassay

A serum immunoglobulin G enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for Helicobacter pylori antibodies already in use in adults was evaluated with 99 pediatric serum samples to determine its usefulness for the study of H. pylori disease in children. The reference method used was either the (13)C-urea breath test or a biopsy culture of gastric mucosa. In children, an EIA cutoff of 0.35 absorbancy unit yielded sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 93, 97, 93, and 97%, respectively. The cutoff recommended when this EIA was published for use in adults was 0.70 absorbancy unit (H. Gnarpe, P. Unge, C. Blomqvist, and S. M?kitalo, APMIS 96:128-132, 1988). Another subset of 169 serum samples taken from children was analyzed by four serological tests in order to compare the performance of the in-house EIA with the Pyloriset, HM-CAP, and Helico-G kits. For the 169 samples, 10 (5.9%) false-positives and no false-negatives occurred with the Helico-G, 3 (1.8%) false-positives and no false-negatives occurred with the Pyloriset, and 3 (1.8%) false-positives and 1 (0.6%) false-negative occurred with the HM-CAP. For the 169 samples, 1 (0.6%) false-positive and no false-negatives occurred with the in-house EIA. Serological detection of H. pylori antibodies with our EIA seems to be valuable in diagnosing H. pylori infection in children, but only if a lowered, specific pediatric cutoff is established. The commercial kits, particularly the Helico-G, seem to overdiagnose pediatric H. pylori infection. A positive serological test for H. pylori infection, particularly for children, needs to be confirmed by a reference method because of the possibility of spontaneous eradication of infection, with a lingering serological response.     

Evaluation of eight enzyme immunoassays for detection of immunoglobulin G against Helicobacter pylori.

Eight commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were used to test sera taken from 102 patients in whom Helicobacter pylori infection status had been determined by means of biopsy culture, PCR, histology, and urease production and by 13C urea breath test. By those means, 61 patients had been found to be infected. Assays were compared by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivities ranged from 86 to 98%; specificities ranged from 83 to 98%. In a group consisting of the assays by Bio-Whittaker, Meddens Biotech, Orion (Pyloriset EIA G, new version), and Enteric Products, Inc. (HM Cap), differences in performance were not statistically significant. Sensitivities in this group ranged from 93 to 98%; specificities ranged from 95 to 98%. Assays from this group may be useful in addition to biopsy-based methods in diagnosing H. pylori infection.     

Assessment of Helicobacter pylori vacA and cagA genotypes and host serological response

Helicobacter pylori strains can be distinguished by genotyping of virulence-associated genes, such as vacA and cagA. Because serological discrimination between strain types would reduce the need for endoscopy, 61 patients carrying H. pylori were studied by vacA and cagA genotyping of H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens and by detection of specific serum antibodies. Serological responses to H. pylori were determined by Helicoblot (versions 2.0 and 2.1). Antibodies to CagA also were determined by a rapid anti-CagA assay (Pyloriset screen CagA) as well as by two noncommercially developed enzyme immunoassays, each using a recombinant CagA protein. Assessment of performance of the Helicoblot assays indicated substantial interobserver variation, with kappa values between 0.20 and 0.93. There was no relationship between the serological profiles on the Helicoblot and the genotypes from the same patients, except for strong associations between the presence of anti-CagA and the cagA-positive and vacA s1 H. pylori genotypes. Detection of anti-CagA by the five different assays varied considerably, with kappa values ranging from 0.21 to 0.78. Using the cagA genotype as the "gold standard," the sensitivity and specificity of the anti-CagA assays varied from 71.4 to 85.7% and from 54.2 to 100%, respectively. Thus, serological profiles of antibodies to H. pylori are heterogeneous and, with the exception of anti-CagA antibodies, show no relation to the H. pylori vacA and cagA genotypes. Detection of anti-CagA antibodies is strongly dependent on the test used.     

Evaluation of Pyloriset Screen, a Rapid Whole-Blood Diagnostic Test for Helicobacter pylori Infection

Helicobacter pylori infection can be detected by several invasive tests based on gastroscopy and by noninvasive methods such as serologic assays. Noninvasive tests can be used not only in addition to invasive tests but also by themselves to screen for H. pylori infection in patients who are not in urgent need of endoscopy. Lately, rapid qualitative serologic tests have been developed. In the present study, the accuracy of a novel rapid whole-blood test, Pyloriset Screen, detecting immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies against H. pylori was evaluated. A total of 207 consecutive adult outpatients referred for upper endoscopy were enrolled. Gastric biopsy specimens were taken from the antrum and corpus for histologic examination and rapid urease testing. Cultures were available for 113 patients. Serum samples collected from all patients were tested for H. pylori antibodies by two enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Pyloriset EIA and an in-house EIA), a rapid latex agglutination test (Pyloriset Dry), and Pyloriset Screen. Patients were considered H. pylori positive if helicobacters were seen on histologic examination (77 patients) or, if in combination with histologically verified (although helicobacter-negative) gastritis, their IgG antibody titers were elevated in the two EIAs (five patients). The Pyloriset Screen test had a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 94%, a positive predictive value of 91%, and a negative predictive value of 97%. Among 63 patients under the age of 45 years, the Pyloriset Screen test did not miss a single H. pylori diagnosis, and only 1 patient had a false-positive result. Pyloriset Screen could be used reliably to screen for H. pylori infection.