Neutrophil growth factors

A significant advance in the field of neutrophil growth factors has occurred with the commercial availability of pegfilgrastim (Neulasta, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA), a new-generation, pegylated filgrastim molecule with a sustained duration of action. Pegylation of filgrastim allows once-per-chemotherapy cycle frequency of administration, in contrast to repeated daily administration of filgrastim. Clinical data from two randomized trials demonstrate equivalence of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim in duration of severe neutropenia and recovery from absolute neutrophil count nadir following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. In addition, secondary endpoint results in both trials suggest an enhanced reduction in the overall incidence of febrile neutropenia with pegfilgrastim. Neutrophil kinetic studies demonstrate steady serum neutrophil levels following pegfilgrastim administration, in contrast to the peak-and-trough neutrophil effects observed following filgrastim administration. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy has an antiapoptotic effect on neutrophils, which may be enhanced by continuous serum concentrations of pegfilgrastim. Monocytes possess a G-CSF receptor, and this finding has fueled investigational analysis of the role of G-CSF as a mediator in the host inflammatory response to foreign pathogens. The data demonstrate that depending on the timing of administration, G-CSF may function as a proinflammatory mediator or an anti-inflammatory mediator. It is likely that the early, prophylactic administration of pegfilgrastim creates an environment in which an anti-inflammatory response predominates. Additional investigational studies will be necessary to confirm and better define the mechanism for enhanced benefit of pegfilgrastim over filgrastim. The recent biologic findings of the mechanism of G-CSF therapy reviewed here provide a strong basis from which further research initiatives may be conducted.     

Pegfilgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant: phase II study

Pegfilgrastim is equivalent to daily filgrastim after standard dose chemotherapy in decreasing the duration of neutropenia. Daily filgrastim started within 1-4 days after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) leads to significant decrease in time to neutrophil engraftment. We undertook a study of pegfilgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and ASCT. In all, 38 patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma, eligible to undergo HDC and ASCT, were enrolled. Patients received a single dose of 6 mg pegfilgrastim subcutaneously 24 h after ASCT. There were no adverse events secondary to pegfilgrastim. All patients engrafted neutrophils and platelets with a median of 10 and 18 days, respectively. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 49% (18/37). Neutrophil engraftment results were compared to a historical cohort of patients who received no growth factors or prophylactic filgrastim after ASCT. Time to neutrophil engraftment using pegfilgrastim was comparable to daily filgrastim and was shorter than in a historical group receiving no filgrastim (10 vs 13.7 days, P<0.001). Pegfilgrastim given as a single fixed dose of 6 mg appears to be safe after HDC and ASCT. It accelerates neutrophil engraftment comparable to daily filgrastim after ASCT. Pegfilgrastim may be convenient to use in outpatient transplant units.     

Fixed-dose single administration of Pegfilgrastim vs daily Filgrastim in patients with haematological malignancies undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Infectious complications are frequent events in patients undergoing high-dose cytotoxic chemotherapy with subsequent autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). To evaluate whether a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (6 mg) is as safe and effective as daily filgrastim (5 mug/kg/day), 60 consecutive autologous stem cell transplantations performed for various haematological malignancies have been analysed. In total, 24 patients undergoing 30 consecutive PBSCT received a single subcutaneous injection of 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day 5 after transplantation and were compared retrospectively with 30 patients receiving 5 mug/kg/day of filgrastim starting from day 7 post transplantation. The mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups was 8.3 and 9.5 days, respectively (P=0.047). The results of the two groups were not significantly different for incidence of febrile neutropenia and toxicity profile. However, duration of febrile neutropenia (1.6 vs 3.0 days) and total days of fever (1.73 vs 4.1) were different (P=0.017 and 0.003, respectively), favouring the pegfilgrastim arm. Consequently, a higher incidence of transplants with documented infectious complications associated with the filgrastim group could be observed (56 vs 26%) (P=0.02). A single injection of pegfilgrastim administered at day 5 post transplant shows comparable safety and efficacy profiles to daily injections of filgrastim.     

A randomized,double‐blind trial of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for the management of neutropenia during CHASE(R) chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma

Pegfilgrastim is a pegylated form of the granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor, filgrastim. Herein, we report the results of a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind phase III trial comparing the efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim in patients with malignant lymphoma. Patients were randomized to receive either a single subcutaneous dose of pegfilgrastim or daily subcutaneous doses of filgrastim on day 4 after the completion of cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, etoposide and dexamethasone ± rituximab (CHASE(R); day 1–3) chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN), defined as the number of days with neutrophil count <0·5 × 10⁹/l in the first cycle of chemotherapy. A total of 111 lymphoma patients were randomized to either the pegfilgrastim or filgrastim group. 109 patients received either pegfilgrastim (n = 54) or filgrastim (n = 55). Efficacy data were available for 107 patients (pegfilgrastim: n = 53, filgrastim: n = 54). Both groups were well balanced in terms of gender, age, performance status and other variables. The mean DSN (±S.D.) was 4·5 (±1·2) and 4·7 (±1·3) d in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups. No significant difference in safety was observed. This trial verified the non‐inferiority of a single subcutaneous dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily subcutaneous doses of filgrastim, considering DSN as an indicator.     

Sustained G-CSF plasma levels following administration of pegfilgrastim fasten neutrophil reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE: Pegfilgrastim has shown to decrease the duration of severe neutropenia after conventional chemotherapy, but its use after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation has not been established yet. Therefore we studied the efficacy and the pharmacokinetic profile of pegfilgrastim in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. METHOD: In total, 21 patients received a single subcutaneous injection of 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day +1 after transplantation and pegfilgrastim plasma levels were measured daily by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clinical outcome was compared with pegfilgrastim levels of 282 plasma samples and data of a historical control group of patients without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. RESULTS: Pegfilgrastim levels showed an inverse correlation (r = -0.68, p < 0.01) with neutrophil counts. Peak levels were reached at day +4 (94 ng/mL; range: 37-205) and were maintained until day +7 (85 ng/mL; range: 35-186). Comparison with the control group without G-CSF support showed that time to neutrophil reconstitution was significantly shorter in the pegfilgrastim group with 10 vs 15 days, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no correlation of pegfilgrastim levels and the duration of neutropenia, although patients with a fivefold increase in neutrophil counts the day after pegfilgrastim administration had a significantly shorter median duration of neutropenia in comparison to patients who were less susceptible to G-CSF stimulation (5 vs 7 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Neutrophil reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy could be accelerated by the use of pegfilgrastim in patients with myeloma. Responsiveness of neutrophils to pegfilgrastim before neutropenia was correlated with faster neutrophil reconstitution, whereas G-CSF levels had no impact on neutrophil recovery.     

Pegfilgrastim reduces the length of hospitalization and the time to engraftment in multiple myeloma patients treated with melphalan 200 and auto-SCT compared with filgrastim

To reduce the duration of neutropenia after conditioning chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT), granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) are commonly administered. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of pegfilgrastim compared to filgrastim on neutrophil engraftment, hospital stay, and supportive measures in patients with multiple myeloma after conditioning with Melphalan 200 (Mel200) followed by APBSCT. Ninety-two APBSCT after Mel200 treatment were performed in 72 patients between January 2006 and December 2009 at our institution. Patients received either single-dose pegfilgrastim (n?=?46; 50%), or daily filgrastim (n?=?46; 50%) after APBSCT (median duration of filgrastim use, 9?days; range, 3?C14?days). Duration of neutropenia grade IV was shorter with pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim (median, 5?days (range, 3?C14?days) versus 6?days (range, 3?C9?days), p?=?0.0079). The length of hospitalization differed significantly (pegfilgrastim (median, 14.5?days; range, 11?C47?days) versus filgrastim (median, 15.5?days; range, 12?C64?days), p?=?0.024). Pegfilgrastim-treated patients had less red blood cell transfusions (median, 0 transfusions (range, 0?C10) versus 0.5 transfusions (range, 0?C9), p?=?0.00065). Pegfilgrastim was associated with reduced cost of the treatment procedure compared with filgrastim (p?=?0.031). Pegfilgrastim appears to be at least equivalent to filgrastim without additional expenditure in myeloma patients treated with Mel200 and APBSCT.     

Pegfilgrastim,a sustained-duration form of filgrastim,significantly improves neutrophil recovery after autologous marrow transplantation in rhesus macaques

Daily administration of filgrastim decreases the duration of severe neutropenia in the clinical setting. A sustained-duration form of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, significantly reduces scheduling protocols to a single injection per chemotherapy cycle while maintaining therapeutic efficiency. We examined the ability of a single injection of pegfilgrastim to significantly improve neutrophil recovery following autologous bone marrow transplantation (AuBMT) in rhesus macaques. On day 1, postmyeloablation (920 cGy x-irradiation) and AuBMT, animals received either 0.1% autologous serum for 18 consecutive days (n=13), or single doses of pegfilgrastim via the subcutaneous (s.c.) or intravenous (i.v.) route (300 or 100 micro g/kg), or a single dose of filgrastim at 300 micro g/kg via the s.c. or i.v. route, or filgrastim at 10 micro g/kg via the s.c. route (n=4) on a daily basis (range=days 12-17). Pharmacokinetic parameters and neutrophil recovery were assessed. A single dose of pegfilgrastim via the i.v. or s.c. route was as effective as daily filgrastim administration, resulting in significant improvement of neutrophil recovery after myeloablation and ABuMT. Effective pegfilgrastim plasma concentrations were maintained in neutropenic animals until after the onset of hematopoietic recovery. Enhanced pharmacokinetics in AuBMT cohorts are consistent with self-regulating, neutrophil-mediated clearance.     

Glycosylated vs non-glycosylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)--results of a prospective randomised monocentre study

The discovery of the haematopoietic growth factor granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has reduced infection-related morbidity in cancer patients by alleviating post-chemotherapy neutropenia. Two formulations of recombinant human (rh) G-CSF, one glycosylated and one non-glycosylated, are available. The glycosylated form, lenograstim, possesses at least 25% greater bioactivity in vitro. Some comparative studies into the preparation's potential to mobilise haematopoietic stem cells suggest a similar advantage. In the light of the great clinical importance of G-CSF, we have performed the first prospective, randomised, crossover study on children with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. G-CSF (250 microg/m(2)) was started 1 day after the chemotherapy block, and was administered until a WBC >1500/microl was achieved on 3 successive days. Thirty-three G-CSF cycles from 11 patients (16 lenograstim, 17 filgrastim) were studied. They were investigated for duration of very severe (WBC <500/microl, 9 vs 9.5 days, lenograstim vs filgrastim, median) and severe leukopenia (WBC <1000/microl, 11 vs 11 days), infections (CRP >5 mg/dl, 5 vs 5.5 days), infection-related hospital stay (11 vs 9 days) and antibiotic treatment (9 vs 9 days). Statistical evaluation by paired analysis could not detect any difference between treatment groups; the median difference for all end-points was zero. In summary, at least at 250 microg/m(2), in terms of their clinical effect on neutropenia, the two G-CSF preparations appear to have identical activity.     

Usefulness of G-CSF in pediatric high risk cancer patients with fever and neutropenia

Chemotherapy associated febrile neutropenia is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients with cancer. The use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) post chemotherapy decreases the risk of infectious complications but its efficacy during the febrile neutropenic episode remains controversial. Thirty five episodes of high-risk febrile neutropenia were randomized into two treatment arms, 18 received antibiotics and G-CSF (group A) and 17 received antibiotics only upon admission (group B). Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. No significant differences between groups were found in duration of hospitalization (mean group A 7 vs group B 8 days), antibiotic treatment (mean 7 vs 8 days), fever (3 vs 2 days), nor of neutropenia (4 vs 3 days). One patient in group A died after RSV infection. Considering these results and a literature review, we propose that G-CSF should not be recommended in children during the course of their febrile neutropenic episode.     

Myeloid growth factors as anti-infective measures in children with leukemia and lymphoma

Clinical trials in children treated for leukemia and lymphoma demonstrated that the hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) granulocyte (G) and granulocyte-macrophage (GM) CSFs ameliorate duration and depth of neutropenia, and also seem to decrease antibiotic usage and hospitalization. However, neither G-CSF nor GM-CSF significantly reduced the risk for infectious complications, such as febrile neutropenia or documented infections, or improved overall survival in these patient populations. Since it is unclear whether G- and GM-CSF may increase the risk for relapse in subgroups of patients with leukemia, guidelines recommend that hematopoietic growth factors should be used with caution in children with leukemia and lymphoma.     

Current status of growth factors in the treatment of acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia

The safety of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients with acute leukemia has been well established in numerous clinical trials. The primary aim of these studies was to determine whether CSFs, when used as adjuncts to intensive chemotherapy, reduced the duration of neutropenia, prevented febrile neutropenia, infections, and hospitalization rates, and improved response and overall outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Despite considerable efforts in divers clinical settings, the potential advantages of hematopoietic growth factors in the management of these leukemias remain inconclusive. In general, individual published trials have shown declines in the incidence and/or duration of neutropenia but have not consistently demonstrated a reduction in the overall frequency of infectious complications or the duration of hospitalization. Most protocols also have failed to show a benefit in terms of disease-free or overall survival. Nevertheless, improvements in "soft" clinical end points, such as incidence of severe infections, may be clinically important and contribute, even if only incrementally, to the patient's quality of life. Selection of those patients likely to benefit from growth factors in a specific clinical setting is a worthwhile endeavour.     

Incidence of neutropenia and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in multiple myeloma: is current clinical practice adequate?

Although immunomodulatory drugs, alkylating agents, corticosteroids, protease inhibitors, and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies improve multiple myeloma outcomes, treatment burden is still an issue. Neutropenia is a known complication of cytotoxic cancer therapy and is often associated with infections; it is an important consideration in myeloma given the fact that patients often have a weakened immune system. The risk of febrile neutropenia increases with severe and persisting neutropenia. Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are commonly used to reduce the incidence, duration, and severity of febrile neutropenia. Here, we review the risk and management of neutropenia associated with new and commonly used anti-myeloma agents. Few papers report the use of G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma receiving anti-cancer treatments, and fewer describe whether G-CSF was beneficial. None of the identified studies reported G-CSF primary prophylaxis. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the need for G-CSF prophylaxis in multiple myeloma. Prophylaxis may be particularly useful in patients at high risk of prolonged severe neutropenia.     

Hämatopoetische Wachstumsfaktoren

The production of hematopoietic cells is under the tight control of distinct growth factors. As therapeutic agents, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), erythropoietin (EPO), and thrombopoiesis-stimulating agents (TSA) are in routine clinical use. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is used to prevent febrile neutropenia or to increase dose-density in chemotherapy regimens. Despite a reduced duration of neutropenia, randomized controlled trials have documented only a modest clinical benefit. A clinical advantage of dose-dense chemotherapy has been shown only in specific chemotherapy regimens. Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of G-CSF for patients with a high risk of adverse outcome of febrile neutropenia. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are used as an alternative to blood transfusion in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. However, recent meta-analyses of clinical studies suggest that their use was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Thrombopoiesis-stimulating agents have been introduced recently into the market for patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Prior to the use of TSA in other conditions such as chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia the lessons learned with G-CSF and ESAs should be taken into account.     

Oral combination chemotherapy in conjunction with filgrastim (G-CSF) in the treatment of AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: evaluation of the role of G-CSF; quality-of-life analysis and long-term follow-up

In 1993 we reported the efficacy and toxicity profile of an oral combination regimen administered to 18 patients with AIDS-related lymphoma (NHL-1 study). We observed a 61% response rate; 39% one-year survival rate; nearly two-thirds of patients developed > or = grade 3 leukopenia; and 28% of cycles were associated with febrile neutropenia. These results prompted us to shorten the duration of therapy and to add G-CSF to ameliorate the myelosuppression. Twenty patients with biopsy-proven AIDS-related lymphoma were treated with three 6-week cycles of oral chemotherapy consisting of lomustine (CCNU) 100 mg/m2 on day 1, cycles no. 1 and 3; etoposide 200 mg/m2 days 1-3; cyclophosphamide and procarbazine both 100 mg/m2 days 22-31; and G-CSF 5 microg/kg subcutaneously days 5-21 and days 33-42 (NHL-2 study). The following analyses were undertaken: (1) evaluation of toxicity and efficacy parameters for patients in the current (NHL-2) study; (2) analysis of the clinical role of G-CSF by (historical) comparison with the NHL-1 study of the same regimen without G-CSF; (3) quality-of-life assessments using the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) instruments for all 38 patients (NHL-1+2); and (4) long-term follow-up for all 38 patients. In the current study the overall objective response using ECOG criteria was 70% (95% CI, 50-90%) with 6 CRs (30%) and 8 PRs (40%). The median survival duration was 7.3 months (range: 0.5-51+ months). One patient developed CNS relapse. There were no significant differences with respect to demographics or prognostic factors between the patient populations of the NHL-1 study and the current study (P > 0.2 for each factor). Myelosuppression was the major toxicity in both studies. In the current study versus the NHL-1 study, although the lower incidences of grade 3/4 myelosuppression (51% vs. 64%) and febrile neutropenia (17% vs. 28%) on a per cycle basis were not statistically significant, fewer patients (40% vs. 60%) were affected. However, the severity of myelotoxicity was lessened with the addition of G-CSF, measured in terms of the discontinuation of therapy, myelotoxic deaths, and freedom from grade 3/4 myelotoxicity ( P < 0.02). The number of hospitalizations for febrile neutropenia (7 in the NHL-2 study vs. 13 in the NHL-1 study) was also significantly different (P < 0.05). Quality-of-life analysis confirmed no significant functional or psychological deterioration during therapy except for patients experiencing febrile neutropenia, whose functional capacity deteriorated (P < 0.04). The 1-year, 18-month, and 2-year survival rates for the combined studies (38 patients) were 32%, 21%, and 13%, respectively. At time of death 49% of patients were free from progression of their lymphoma. Administration of the oral regimen has resulted in 13% of patients surviving two years, and half of patients surviving free from progression of their lymphoma. This regimen is efficacious and considerate of patient quality-of-life issues. The addition of G-CSF to the regimen decreases the frequency of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia.     

The five “Ws” for bone pain due to the administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs)

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are commonly employed in clinical practice. The most relevant adverse event of G-CSF administration is bone pain. Approximately 20% of cancer patients experienced bone pain with the administration of prophylactic daily G-CSFs (lenograstim and filgrastim). The reported incidence of bone pain in cancer patients undergoing pegfilgrastim prophylaxis ranged from 25% to 38%. In healthy donors the incidence of bone pain was higher than in cancer patients, ranging from 52% to 84%. There are four main causes of G-CSF related bone pain: bone marrow quantitative and qualitative expansion, peripheral nociceptor sensitization to nociceptive stimuli, modulation of immune function and direct effect on bone metabolism. For the prevention and treatment of bone pain occurring after or during GCSFs administration, acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents are commonly used as first-line treatment; antihistamines, opioids and dose reduction of G-CSFs are considered as second line therapy. The only randomized clinical trial conducted for the prevention and treatment of G-CSF induced bone pain showed the efficacy of naproxen in reducing the incidence, the severity and the duration of bone pain induced by the administration of pegfilgrastim.     

Comparison of lenograstim and filgrastim: effects on blood cell recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate whether glycosylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (lenograstim) offers a benefit over non-glycosylated G-CSF (filgrastim) in clinically relevant end points after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT).Methods We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 261 patients treated with either lenograstim (n=68) or filgrastim (n=193). Time to blood cell recovery, toxicities, and infectious complications were analyzed in a total of 469 G-CSF treatment cycles.Results Mean time to leukocyte recovery was 10.7 days (SD±0.9) (lenograstim) and 10.8 days (SD±0.6) (filgrastim), respectively. Likewise, time to thrombocyte engraftment, febrile days, duration of therapeutic antibiotic treatment, severity of non-hematological toxicities, duration of in-hospital stay, and duration of G-CSF treatment were similar in both groups. Owing to the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of lenograstim, the required dose until leukocyte recovery was significantly smaller as compared to filgrastim (38.5 vs 54.0 µg/kg of body weight).Conclusions Collectively, our data indicate that both G-CSF preparations are equally effective in hastening leukocyte recovery in the setting of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous PBSCT.     

Neutrophil recovery in elderly breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant anthracycline-containing chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim support

Shortening duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia may reduce risk of infection and aid subsequent chemotherapy delivery. Cycle 1 neutrophil recovery was evaluated in 59 elderly women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant FEC100 (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m², epirubicin 100 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m²) and randomized to pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis (PP) from cycle 1, or secondary prophylaxis (SP, i.e., subsequent to a neutropenic event [no G-CSF in cycle 1]). In cycle 1, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 77% (PP; N = 30) and 72% (SP; N = 29). Duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia was shorter with pegfilgrastim than without. Mean absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovered above 1.0 × 10⁹/L by day 9 (pegfilgrastim) versus days 16-18 (without). At last observation (≥day 14 ± 2), no PP patient had ANC <1.0 × 10⁹/L versus approximately 25% of those receiving no pegfilgrastim. In conclusion, cycle 1 pegfilgrastim improved recovery from severe neutropenia in elderly breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant FEC100.     

Cost benefit and clinical efficacy of low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after standard chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

High costs of molecule-targeted drugs, such as rituximab, ibritumomab, and tositumomab have given rise to an economical issue for treating patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs), which are also expensive, are widely used for treating neutropenia after chemotherapy. In Japan, lenograstim at 2 microg/kg (about 100 microg/body) or filgrastim at 50 microg/m(2) (about 75 microg/body) is commonly administered for patients with NHL after chemotherapy. Therefore, cost-effectiveness is an important issue in treatment for NHL. Patients with advanced-stage NHL who needed chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or a CHOP-like regimen with or without rituximab were enrolled in this randomized cross-over trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose G-CSF. Half of the patients were administered 75 microg filgrastim in the first course after neutropenia and 50 microg lenograstim in the second course, and the other half were crossed over. Forty-seven patients were enrolled in this cross-over trial, and 24 patients completed the trial. Frequencies and durations of grade 4 leukocytopenia and neutropenia were similar in the two groups. Severe infection was rare and was observed at similar frequency. Frequencies of antibiotics use were also similar. The total cost of G-CSF (cost/drug x duration of administration) was significantly lower in patients who received 50 microg lenograstim. Hence, a low dose of lenograstim might be safe, effective and pharmaco-economically beneficial in patients with advanced-stage NHL.     

Use of colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-associated neutropenia: review of current guidelines

Chemotherapy-associated neutropenia is often dose-limiting and may compromise treatment efficacy. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) are increasingly used to prevent febrile neutropenia (FN) or to increase dose-density. This review discusses recent changes in treatment guidelines for chemotherapy-associated neutropenia. Primary prophylactic use of CSFs is now recommended as a treatment option at an overall risk of FN of 20%, not taking into account cost-effectiveness. To estimate the risk of FN, patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors predicting an adverse outcome of FN have been determined. Dose-dense chemotherapy has become feasible with the use of CSFs. However, clinical benefit has been shown only for specific chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), for the latter particularly for patients above 60 years of age. Strategies are being developed to tailor the use of CSFs to patients with a high risk of adverse outcome of FN.     

A prospective study on the epidemiology of febrile episodes during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in children with cancer or after hemopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the incidence and clinical characteristics of febrile episodes during neutropenia following chemotherapy in children with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, 3-year single-center observational study of periods of neutropenia was performed. Epidemiology and clinical diagnoses of febrile episodes occurring during the neutropenic periods were evaluated, taking into consideration different categories of anticancer treatment based on the type of tumor and phase of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 703 febrile episodes were observed during 614 (34%) of 1792 neutropenic periods (34%), for a total of 28,001 days at risk, accounting for a rate of 0.76 episodes per 30 days at risk. The highest proportions of neutropenic periods with primary febrile episodes were observed after autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (58%), aggressive treatment for acute leukemia or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (48%), and allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (44%); the lowest proportion (9%) was observed during maintenance chemotherapy for acute leukemia (P<.001). The most frequent clinical diagnosis was fever of unknown origin (in 79% of cases), followed by bacteremia (10%); invasive mycosis was diagnosed in only 2% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of febrile neutropenia and severe infectious complications in children with cancer is low, with differences according to the aggressiveness of chemotherapy. This fact must be considered when designing clinical trials on the management of infectious complications in children with cancer.