A randomized trial of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty as a rescue intervention after failed thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to assess whether coronary stenting produces better results compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after failed thrombolysis. BACKGROUND: Little evidence exists on the value of rescue mechanical reperfusion after failed thrombolysis. METHODS: This open-label, randomized study enrolled 181 patients with AMI referred for failed thrombolysis performed within the previous 24 h. The patients had to have a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade of 相似文献   

Late myocardial salvage: time to recognize its reality in the reperfusion therapy of acute myocardial infarction.

The prevailing opinion in the reperfusion therapy of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is that the benefit of reperfusion is mostly confined to the first 12 h after the symptom onset. This opinion is based on the results of the prior megatrials of thrombolytic therapy and the experimental studies. Thrombolytic studies have unequivocally proven that the efficacy of thrombolysis to salvage ischaemic myocardium is drastically reduced with the increase in the time-to-treatment interval. A relatively large number of patients present beyond the limit efficacy of thrombolysis and are considered ineligible for this reperfusion modality. Recent experimental and clinical evidence indicates that a large amount of viable myocardium is still present in the area at risk in patients with AMI presenting late after symptom onset and considered ineligible for thrombolysis. In this review, we summarized the existing data demonstrating that this viable myocardium is salvageable given the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used as a reperfusion therapy. By emphasizing this fact, we do not mean to contest the concept of time dependence of myocardial necrosis following coronary occlusion and time dependence of efficacy of interventions performed early (within 2-3 h) after symptom onset or to dissuade the early coronary interventions in patients with AMI. Instead, we strongly recommend the primary PCI in patients with AMI presenting late after onset of myocardial ischaemia.     

Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion grade in angiography correlates with myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with stenting or thrombolysis

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the relationship between the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) myocardial perfusion (TMP) grade and myocardial salvage as well as the usefulness of TMP grade in comparing two different reperfusion strategies. BACKGROUND: The angiographic index of TMP grade correlates with infarct size and mortality after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Its relationship to myocardial salvage and its usefulness in comparing different reperfusion strategies are not known. METHODS: We analyzed the TMP grade on angiograms obtained at one to two weeks after treatment in 267 patients enrolled in two randomized trials that compared stenting with thrombolysis in AMI. Patients were classified into two groups: 159 patients with TMP grade 2/3 and 108 patients with TMP grade 0/1. Two scintigraphic studies were performed: before and one to two weeks after reperfusion. The salvage index was calculated as the proportion of the area at risk salvaged by reperfusion. RESULTS: Patients with TMP grade 2/3 had a higher salvage index (0.49 +/- 0.42 vs. 0.34 +/- 0.49, p = 0.01), a smaller final infarct size (15.4 +/- 15.5% vs. 22.1 +/- 16.2% of the left ventricle, p = 0.001), and a trend toward lower one-year mortality (3.8% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.11) than patients with TMP grade 0/1. The relationship between TMP and salvage index was independent of the form of reperfusion therapy. The proportion of patients with TMP grade 2/3 was significantly higher after stenting than after thrombolysis (70.9% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that the TMP grade is a useful marker of the degree of myocardial salvage achieved with reperfusion and a sensitive indicator of the efficacy of reperfusion strategies in patients with AMI.     

Predictive value of basal C-reactive protein levels for myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction is dependent on the type of reperfusion treatment.

AIMS: To evaluate whether C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on admission are predictive of myocardial salvage achieved with different reperfusion strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with AMI treated with stenting plus abciximab (n=125) and thrombolysis alone (n=54) or with abciximab (n=71) were prospectively studied. CRP levels were measured by a high sensitivity assay. The threshold of the upper quartile (12 mg/l) was used to divide patients into two groups: 60 patients with high CRP (>12 mg/l) and 190 patients with low CRP (< or =12 mg/l). Myocardial salvage was measured by technetium (Tc)-99(m)sestamibi scintigraphy. Patients in the high CRP group had a significantly lower salvage index (0.35+/-0.42 vs 0.48+/-0.34, p=0.01) and higher 18-month mortality (11.7 vs 3.2%, p=0.03) compared to those in the low CRP group. While basal CRP was not related to myocardial salvage in patients treated with stenting plus abciximab (p=0.89) or thrombolysis plus abciximab (p=0.43), a high CRP on admission was associated with a significantly lower salvage index (0.09+/-0.48 vs 0.42+/-0.37 in the low CRP group, p=0.006) among patients treated with thrombolysis alone. CONCLUSION: CRP levels on admission may predict the efficacy of reperfusion in patients with AMI. The predictive ability is dependent on the form of reperfusion therapy.     

A randomized evaluation of the effects of glucose-insulin-potassium infusion on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with reperfusion therapy

Background

Intravenous glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) may have a positive metabolic influence in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who receive reperfusion therapy. The objective of this randomized trial was to assess for the first time whether GIK improves myocardial salvage in patients with AMI.

Methods

The Reevaluation of Intensified Venous Metabolic Support for Acute Infarct Size Limitation (REVIVAL) trial is a randomized, open-label study conducted among 312 patients with AMI. Patients were randomly assigned to either the GIK therapy group (n = 155) or the control group (n = 157). All patients were intended to receive reperfusion treatment, which was given in all but 5 patients (1.6%). The primary end point of the study was salvage index, measured as the proportion of initial perfusion defect (acute technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy) salvaged by therapy (follow-up scintigraphy performed after 7 to 14 days).

Results

The primary end point of the study, the salvage index, was in median 0.50 (25th, 75th percentiles: 0.18, 0.87) in the GIK group and 0.48 (25th, 75th percentiles: 0.27, 0.78) in the control group (P = .96). By 6 months, the mortality rate was 5.8% in the GIK group and 6.4% in the control group (P = .85; relative risk, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.37 to 2.26). Subgroup analyses showed that GIK therapy was associated with increased salvage index only among diabetic patients (mean difference, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.37).

Conclusions

The routine use of GIK therapy in patients with AMI is not associated with enhanced myocardial salvage. This therapy appears to improve myocardial salvage only among diabetic patients.     

Gender and myocardial salvage after reperfusion treatment in acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are gender-associated differences in the amount of myocardial salvage after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Despite having a more adverse cardiovascular risk profile, women with AMI have similar or even better outcomes after primary PCI compared with men. The reasons for these findings are unclear. METHODS: In this study we included 202 women and 561 men with AMI who underwent primary PCI in the setting of three randomized trials. The primary end point of the study was myocardial salvage index (proportion of initial perfusion defect salvaged by reperfusion therapy), obtained by paired scintigraphic studies performed 7 to 10 days apart. RESULTS: The amount of myocardium at risk or initial perfusion defect (median [25th, 75th percentiles]) did not differ significantly between women and men (22.0% [12.0, 40.0] vs. 24.0% [14.0, 39.0] of the left ventricle [LV], p = 0.26). Final infarct size, measured in the follow-up scintigraphy, was significantly smaller in women than in men (6.0% [0.71, 18.7] vs. 10.0% [3.9, 21.8] of the LV, p = 0.001). Myocardial salvage index was 0.64 (0.35, 0.95) in women versus 0.50 (0.26, 0.77) in men (p < 0.001). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, female gender was an independent predictor of greater myocardial salvage after PCI (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of primary PCI in patients with AMI appears to be gender-dependent. Myocardial salvage achieved by primary PCI is greater in women than in men.     

Increase of myocardial salvage and left ventricular function recovery with intracoronary abciximab downstream of the coronary occlusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention.

In this prospective randomized trial on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we hypothesized that abciximab administered intracoronarily, downstream of the coronary occlusion, leads to a greater degree of myocardial salvage and better left ventricular function recovery compared with the usual abciximab administration. Forty-five consecutive patients with first AMI and infarct-related artery TIMI flow 0-1 undergoing primary PCI were enrolled. Twenty-two patients were randomly assigned to the intracoronary treatment and 23 to the usual treatment. The initial perfusion defect, final infarct size, myocardial salvage, salvage index, and left ventricular function recovery were assessed by serial scintigraphic scans performed at admission and 7 days and 1 month after PCI. Angiographic myocardial blush grade, corrected TIMI frame count, and electrocardiographic ST segment elevation reduction were also assessed as markers of myocardial reperfusion. Final infarct size was significantly smaller (P = 0.043) and salvage index significantly higher (P = 0.003) in the intracoronary treatment group as a result of a greater degree of myocardial salvage (P = 0.0001). The increase of left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 month was significantly higher in the intracoronary treatment patients (P = 0.013). The markers of myocardial reperfusion were also significantly better in the intracoronary treatment group. In patients with AMI and occluded infarct-related artery treated with primary PCI, intracoronary abciximab given just before PCI downstream of the occlusion is associated to a greater degree of myocardial salvage than the usual abciximab protocol. This benefit is mainly related to a substantial reduction in final infarct size, which leads to an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction.     

Effects of intravenous administration of tissue plasminogen activator before thrombectomy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial salvage after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) largely depends on the removal of infarct-related thrombus. Although both thrombolysis and thrombectomy are effective strategies to remove thrombus, there is a paucity of reports regarding the benefit of the combination therapy. Therefore, the efficacy of intravenous administration with mutant tissue plasminogen activator (Mt-PA) before thrombectomy and ordinary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive 44 AMI patients without contraindication of Mt-PA were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to thrombectomy with Mt-PA pre-administration (group T) or thrombectomy alone (group N). Although Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade before PCI and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade immediately after PCI were significantly greater in group T (p<0.05), there was no improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction immediately and 6 months after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that intravenous administration with Mt-PA before thrombectomy had no significant benefit in the salvage of infracted myocardium over thrombectomy alone, despite improvement of coronary microcirculation immediately after PCI.     

Importance of time to reperfusion on outcomes with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (results from the Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trial).

The mortality benefit of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is strongly dependent on time to treatment. Recent observations suggest that time to treatment may be less important with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Patients with AMI of <12 hours duration, without cardiogenic shock, who were treated with primary PTCA from the Stent PAMI Trial (n = 1,232) were evaluated to assess the effect of time to reperfusion on outcomes. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow was achieved in a high proportion of patients regardless of time to treatment. Improvement in ejection fraction from baseline to 6 months was substantial with reperfusion at <2 hours but was modest and relatively independent of time to reperfusion after 2 hours (<2 hours, 12.3% vs > or =2 hours, 4.2%, p = 0.004). There were no differences in 1- or 6-month mortality by time to reperfusion (6-month mortality: <2 hours [5.5%], 2 to <4 hours [4.6%], 4 to <6 hours [4.5%], >6 hours [4.2%], p = 0.97). There were also no differences in other clinical outcomes by time to reperfusion, except that reinfarction and infarct artery reocclusion at 6 months were more frequent with later reperfusion. The lack of correlation between time to treatment and mortality in patients without cardiogenic shock suggests that the survival benefit of primary PTCA may be related principally to factors other than myocardial salvage. These data may also have implications regarding the triage of patients with AMI for primary PTCA.     

Primary versus rescue percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE: To compare angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus rescue PCI following failed thrombolysis. BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with AMI are treated either with primary PCI or with thrombolysis. When thrombolysis fails, rescue PCI is performed. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the outcome of 105 consecutive patients with AMI who underwent either primary PCI (60 patients) or rescue PCI (45 patients) between January 1997 and January 1999. The patients were followed for up to 6 months. Time delay to reperfusion was significantly longer in the rescue PCI group (354 vs. 189 min; p < 0.001). The majority of patients received a stent (93%). Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 53% of patients in the primary PCI group and in 22% in the rescue group. TIMI grade 3 flow was achieved in 93.3% of patients in the primary PCI group and in 88.8% in the rescue group (p = 0.08). Post-procedure ejection fraction was 53% in the primary PCI group and 47% in the rescue group (p = 0.014). A composite endpoint of death, recurrent MI, repeat PCI, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and recurrent angina at 6 months occurred in 35% of the patients in the primary PCI group and 26.7% in the rescue group (p = 0.36). CONCLUSION: Despite a significant delay to reperfusion and a lower immediate post-procedure ejection fraction, the clinical outcome of patients treated with rescue PCI following failed thrombolysis appears to be similar to that of patients treated with primary PCI at 6 months.     

急性心肌梗死的急诊再灌注介入治疗

对急性心肌梗死（AMI）患者直接行经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术（PTCA）临床效果良好。根据AMI发生后行PTCA的时间及与溶栓的关系，AMI急诊介入治疗可分为直接PTCA，补救PTCA，即刻PTCA和延期PTCA，近年还诞生了冠状动脉（冠脉）内支架相干入术等新的介入治疗技术，联合使用新的抗凝，抗血小板药的疗效也得到评价。本文对直接PTCA，补救PTCA，即刻PT-CA，延期PTCA，原发支架植入术和药物辅助性介入治疗的最新进展作一综述。     

Infarct artery reocclusion after primary angioplasty, stent placement, and thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: The benefits of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are limited by reocclusion of the infarct-related artery, which occurs in 25% to 30% of patients after successful reperfusion. The frequency of reocclusion after balloon angioplasty and stenting in this setting is less well documented. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency and timing of reocclusion after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and stent placement during AMI from all available studies compared with previously published reocclusion rates after thrombolysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The previously published thrombolysis data included 4231 patients in 19 studies with > or = 75 patients. Only PTCA studies with > or = 50 patients and stent studies with > or = 30 patients, in which routine angiographic follow-up was obtained in > or = 60% of patients, were included. Ten PTCA studies with a total of 1943 patients were analyzed, with follow-up angiography in 1391 (72%). Reocclusion rates ranged from 5% to 16.7%. The stent studies included 698 patients from 7 studies, with follow-up angiography in 92%. Reocclusion rates ranged from 0% to 6%. With the use of logistic regression analysis with allowance for overdispersion, there was a significantly lower rate of reocclusion after PTCA (odds ratio, 0.38; confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.57; P <.0001) and stent placement (odds ratio, 0.11; confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.22; P <.0001) compared with thrombolysis. Reocclusion after stent placement was lower than after PTCA (odds ratio, 0.28; confidence interval, 0.13 to 0.6; P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Reocclusion after PTCA and stent placement during AMI is less frequent than after thrombolysis. This may contribute to the superior outcome of patients treated with PTCA and stent placement in this setting.     

A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: the Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction study

OBJECTIVES: The Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) study was designed to determine the best reperfusion strategy for patients with high-risk acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at hospitals without percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) capability. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that high-risk patients have better outcomes with primary PTCA than with thrombolytic therapy. It is unknown whether this advantage would be lost if the patient had to be transferred for PTCA, and reperfusion was delayed. METHODS: Patients with high-risk AMI (age >70 years, anterior MI, Killip class II/III, heart rate >100 beats/min or systolic BP <100 mm Hg) who were eligible for thrombolytic therapy were randomized to either transfer for primary PTCA or on-site thrombolysis. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized before the study ended (71 to transfer for PTCA and 67 to thrombolysis). The time from arrival to treatment was delayed in the transfer group (155 vs. 51 min, p < 0.0001), largely due to the initiation of transfer (43 min) and transport time (26 min). Patients randomized to transfer had a reduced hospital stay (6.1 +/- 4.3 vs. 7.5 +/- 4.3 days, p = 0.015) and less ischemia (12.7% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.007). At 30 days, a 38% reduction in major adverse cardiac events was observed for the transfer group; however, because of the inability to recruit the necessary sample size, this did not achieve statistical significance (8.4% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.331). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high-risk AMI at hospitals without a catheterization laboratory may have an improved outcome when transferred for primary PTCA versus on-site thrombolysis; however, this will require further study. The marked delay in the transfer process suggests a role for triaging patients directly to specialized heart-attack centers.     

Beneficial effects of immediate stenting after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: The Southwest German Interventional Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (SIAM III) investigated potentially beneficial effects of immediate stenting after thrombolysis as opposed to a more conservative treatment regimen. BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by thrombolysis is compromised by Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow rates of only 60% and high re-occlusion rates of the infarct-related artery (IRA). Older studies showed no benefit of coronary angioplasty after thrombolysis compared with thrombolytic therapy alone. This observation has been challenged by the superiority of primary stenting over balloon angioplasty in AMI. METHODS: The SIAM III study was a multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled trial in patients receiving thrombolysis in AMI (<12 h). Patients of group I were transferred within 6 h after thrombolysis for coronary angiography, including stenting of the IRA. Group II received elective coronary angiography two weeks after thrombolysis with stenting of the IRA. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients were randomized, 163 patients fulfilled the secondary (angiographic) inclusion criteria (82 in group I, 81 in group II). Immediate stenting was associated with a significant reduction of the combined end point after six months (ischemic events, death, reinfarction, target lesion revascularization 25.6% vs. 50.6%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate stenting after thrombolysis leads to a significant reduction of cardiac events compared with a more conservative approach including delayed stenting after two weeks.     

急性心肌梗塞再灌注治疗方法和时间对心肌存活指数的影响

目的:探讨急性心肌梗塞患者再灌注治疗方法和时间对心肌存活指数的影响。方法:178例心肌梗塞病人中89例用冠脉支架治疗,89例采用溶栓治疗。再根据发病至再灌注治疗时间的不同,每组病人再分为3个亚组:短时间组(<3h),中等时间组(>3h~<5h),长时间组(>5h)。用心肌显像检查评价存活心肌。结果:在溶栓组,低时间组的心肌存活指数[中位数(第25,75百分位数)是[0.45(0.16;0.83)],在中间组为0.29(0.17,0.48),在长时间组为0.20(0.04,0.46)(P<0.05)。而在支架组中,存活数在低时间组为0.56(0.49,0.75),在中间组为0.57(0.36,0.73),长时间组为0.57(0.32,0.75),P>0.05。支架组中、长时间段的心肌存活指数显著高于溶栓组(P<0.001)。结论:对于心肌梗塞12h以内的病人,支架治疗优于溶栓治疗。     

Comparison of reperfusion regimens with or without tirofiban in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction

There is continued debate as to whether a combined reperfusion regimen with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors provides additional benefit in optimal myocardial reperfusion of patients with a ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In addition, the best angiographic method to evaluate optimal myocardial reperfusion is still controversial. Patients (n = 144) with a first AMI presenting <6 hours from onset of symptoms were randomized to receive a conjunctive strategy (n = 72) with low-dose alteplase (50 mg) and tirofiban (0.4 microg/kg/min/30 minute bolus; infusion of 0.1 microg/kg/minute), or tirofiban plus stenting percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Control patients (n = 72) received standard strategy with either full-dose alteplase (100 mg) or stenting PCI [correction]. All patients were submitted to coronary angiographic study at 90 minutes. The primary end point was Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow at 90 minutes. Secondary end points were TIMI myocardial perfusion (TMP) rates, a composite end point at 30 days (death, reinfarction, refractory ischemia, stroke, heart failure, revascularization procedures, or pulmonary edema), and bleeding or hematologic variables. The rate of TIMI 3 flow at 90 minutes for patients treated with alteplase alone was 42% compared with 64% for those who received low-dose alteplase and tirofiban. Standard stenting PCI achieved 81% of TIMI 3 flow compared with 92% when tirofiban was used. Significantly higher rates of TMP grade 3 were observed when tirofiban was used as the adjunctive treatment in both alteplase (66% vs 47%) and stenting PCI (73% vs 55%). Higher rates of the composite end point were observed in standard regimens compared with conjunctive regimens (hazard ratio 5.8, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 26.6, p = 0.023). Regardless of reperfusion regimen, better outcomes were observed when a combination of TIMI 3 flow and TMP grade 3 was achieved. Beyond TIMI 3 flow rate, the TMP grade was an important determinant. The rates of major bleeding were similar (2.8%) for standard versus conjunctive regimens with tirofiban. Thus, tirofiban as a conjunctive therapy for lytic and stenting regimens not only improves TIMI 3 flow rates, but also the TMP3 rates, which are related to a better clinical outcome without an increase in the risk of major bleeding. This study supports the hypothesis that platelets play a key role not only in the atherothrombosis process, but also in the disturbances of microcirculation and tissue perfusion.     

Prognostic value of circulating levels of endothelin-1 in patients after acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty

BACKGROUND: The link between increased circulating level of endothelin (ET)-1 and adverse clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been established. Current studies demonstrate that reperfusion therapy by either thrombolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can salvage myocardium, improving survival of AMI patients. However, whether reperfusion therapy by primary PCI can prevent the adverse effect of ET-1 on clinical outcomes in patients after AMI remains unclear. Therefore, this study examined the predictive value of circulating ET-1 levels on 30-day outcomes in ST-segment elevated AMI treated with primary PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 186 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevated AMI of onset < 12 h who underwent primary PCI. Blood samples for plasma concentration of ET-1 were collected in the catheterization laboratory following vascular puncture. Patients were classified into a high group (group 1, ET-1 level >or= 0.632 pg/mL, n = 93) and a low group (group 2, ET-1 level < 0.632 pg/mL, n = 93) according to the median value of ET-1 after AMI. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the 30-day composite major adverse clinical outcomes (MACO) [advanced Killip score >or= 3], severe congestive heart failure (CHF) [New York Heart Association functional class 4], and 30-day mortality were strongly associated with high ET-1 level (>or= 0.632 pg/mL; p < 0.0001), unsuccessful reperfusion (final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 相似文献   

Early abciximab administration in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors improve myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but optimal timing of administration remains unclear. In this prospective randomized trial, we evaluated the impact of early abciximab administration on angiographic findings, myocardial salvage and left ventricular function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-five consecutive patients with first AMI, undergoing primary PCI, were randomized to abciximab administration either in the emergency room (early group: 27 patients) or in the catheterization laboratory after coronary angiography (late group: 28 patients). The primary outcome measures were initial Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infraction (TIMI) grade flow, corrected TIMI frame count and myocardial blush grade as well as salvage index and left ventricular function recovery as assessed by serial scintigraphic scans performed at admission, and 7 days and 1 month after PCI. Angiographic analysis showed a significant difference in initial TIMI grade 3 flow, corrected TIMI frame count and myocardial blush grade favouring early group. Moreover, salvage index and left ventricular function recovery were significantly greater in the early group (P=0.007; and P=0.043, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AMI, treated with primary PCI, early abciximab administration improves myocardial salvage and left ventricular function recovery probably by starting early recanalization of the infarct-related artery.     

Impact of intravenous beta-blockade before primary angioplasty on survival in patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the effect of intravenous beta-blockers administered before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on survival and myocardial recovery after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Studies of primary PCI but not thrombolysis have suggested that beta-blocker administration before reperfusion may enhance survival. Whether oral beta-blocker use before admission modulates this effect is unknown. METHODS: The Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial randomized 2082 AMI patients to either stenting or balloon angioplasty, each +/- abciximab. In accordance with the protocol, intravenous beta-blockers were administered before PCI in the absence of contraindications. RESULTS: A total of 1136 patients (54.5%, BB+ group) received beta-blockers before PCI, whereas 946 (45.5%, BB- group) did not. The 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the BB+ group than in the BB- group (1.5% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.03), an effect entirely limited to patients who had not been receiving beta-blockers before admission (1.2% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.007). In contrast, no survival benefit with pre-procedural beta-blockers was observed in patients receiving beta-blockers at home (3.3% vs. 1.9%, respectively, p = 0.47). By multivariate analysis, pre-procedural beta-blocker use was an independent predictor of lower 30-day mortality among patients without previous beta-blocker therapy (relative risk = 0.38 [95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.87], p = 0.02). The improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline to seven months was also greater after intravenous beta-blockers (3.8% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.01), an effect limited to patients not receiving oral beta-blockers before admission. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI, myocardial recovery is enhanced and 30-day mortality is reduced with pre-procedural intravenous beta-blockade, effects confined to patients untreated with oral beta-blocker medication before admission.