The Immunobiology of Inductive Anti-CD40L Therapy in Transplantation: Allograft Acceptance is Not Dependent Upon the Deletion of Graft-Reactive T Cells

CD40–CD40L costimulatory interactions are crucial for allograft rejection, in that treatment with anti‐CD40L mAb markedly prolongs allograft survival in several systems. Recent reports indicate that costimulatory blockade results in deletion of graft‐reactive cells, which leads to allograft tolerance. To assess immunologic parameters that were influenced by inductive CD40–CD40L blockade, cardiac allograft recipients were treated with multiple doses of the anti‐CD40L mAb MR1, which was remarkably effective at prolonging allograft survival. Acute allograft rejection responses such as IL‐2 producing helper cell priming, Th1 priming, and alloantibody production were abrogated by anti‐CD40L treatment. Interestingly, the spleens of mice bearing long‐term cardiac allografts following inductive anti‐CD40L treatment retained precursor donor alloantigen‐reactive CTL, IL‐2 producing helper cells, and Th1 in numbers comparable to those observed in naïve mice. These mice retained the ability to reject donor‐strain skin allografts, but were incapable of rejecting the original cardiac allograft, or a second donor‐strain cardiac allograft. Further, differentiated effector cells were incapable of mediating rejection following adoptive transfer into mice bearing long‐term allografts, suggesting that regulatory cell function, rather than effector cell deletion was responsible for long‐term graft acceptance. Collectively, these data demonstrate that inductive CD40–CD40L blockade does not result in the deletion of graft‐reactive T cells, but induces the maintenance of these cells in a quiescent precursor state. They further point to a tissue specificity of this hyporesponsiveness, suggesting that not all donor alloantigen‐reactive cells are subject to this regulation.     

Hyperlipidemia Promotes Anti‐Donor Th17 Responses That Accelerate Allograft Rejection

Hyperlipidemia occurs in 95% of organ transplant recipients, however its effect on organ allograft rejection has not been investigated. We found that induction of hyperlipidemia in mice caused a significant acceleration of rejection of cardiac allografts. Accelerated rejection was associated with an aggressive T cell infiltrate that mediated significant tissue damage as well as increased serum levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IL‐2, IL‐6, and IL‐17. Hyperlipidemic mice had an increased number of Th17 cells in their periphery and rejecting allografts from hyperlipidemic mice contained significant numbers of IL‐17 producing T cells that were not detectable in transplants harvested from controls. Neutralization or genetic ablation of IL‐17 prolonged survival of cardiac allografts transplanted into hyperlipidemic recipients, suggesting that IL‐17 production promotes accelerated rejection. Analysis of alloreactive T cell frequencies directly ex vivo in naïve mice revealed that the frequency of donor reactive IL‐17 producing cells in hyperlipidemic was increased prior to antigen exposure, suggesting that hyperlipidemia was sufficient to alter T cell alloreactivity and promote anti‐donor Th17 responses on first exposure to antigen. Together, our data suggest that hyperlipidemia alters rejection by altering the types of T cell subsets that respond to donor antigen by promoting Th17 biased anti‐donor reactivity.     

Transient Lymphopenia Breaks Costimulatory Blockade‐Based Peripheral Tolerance and Initiates Cardiac Allograft Rejection

Lymphopenia is induced by lymphoablative therapies and chronic viral infections. We assessed the impact of lymphopenia on cardiac allograft survival in recipients conditioned with peritransplant costimulatory blockade (CB) to promote long‐term graft acceptance. After vascularized MHC‐mismatched heterotopic heart grafts were stably accepted through CB, lymphopenia was induced on day 60 posttransplant by 6.5 Gy irradiation or by administration of anti‐CD4 plus anti‐CD8 mAb. Long‐term surviving allografts were gradually rejected after lymphodepletion (MST = 74 ± 5 days postirradiation). Histological analyses indicated signs of severe rejection in allografts following lymphodepletion, including mononuclear cell infiltration and obliterative vasculopathy. Lymphodepletion of CB conditioned recipients induced increases in CD44^high effector/memory T cells in lymphatic organs and strong recovery of donor‐reactive T cell responses, indicating lymphopenia‐induced proliferation (LIP) and donor alloimmune responses occurring in the host. T regulatory (CD4⁺ Foxp³⁺) cell and B cell numbers as well as donor‐specific antibody titers also increased during allograft rejection in CB conditioned recipients given lymphodepletion. These observations suggest that allograft rejection following partial lymphocyte depletion is mediated by LIP of donor‐reactive memory T cells. As lymphopenia may cause unexpected rejection of stable allografts, adequate strategies must be developed to control T cell proliferation and differentiation during lymphopenia.     

Combination of antibodies inhibits accelerated rejection mediated by memory T cells in xenoantigen-primed mice

Wang F, Xia J, Chen J, Peng Y, Cheng P, Ekberg H, Wang X, Qi Z. Combination of antibodies inhibits accelerated rejection mediated by memory T cells in xenoantigen‐primed mice. Xenotransplantation 2010; 17: 460–468. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Donor‐reactive memory T cells are known to accelerate allograft rejection; in our previous study, we reported that combined monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) could prolong islet allograft survival in alloantigen‐primed mice. In this study, we examine the effects of donor‐reactive memory T cells on the xenograft survival and methods to prolong the islet graft survival. Methods: To collect donor‐reactive T cells, we performed full‐thickness rat skin xenografting on BALB/c mice and isolated the T cells from the mice after 6–8 weeks. These cells were then adoptively transferred to syngenic mice 1 day before rat‐to‐mouse islet transplantation. Three experimental groups were established in the adoptive transfer model: recipient mice treated with isotype mAbs (isotype group); mice treated with anti‐CD40L mAb (anti‐CD40L group); and mice treated with anti‐CD40L, anti‐OX40L, and anti‐CD122 mAbs (3‐combined group). Results: Lewis rat islet xenografts transplanted in naïve mice showed a mean survival time (MST) of 12.8 days, while the graft rejection was accelerated if the recipient mice were treated with adoptively transferred donor‐reactive T cells (MST, 8.67 days). Treatment with anti‐CD40L mb could not reverse the accelerated rejection (MST, 9.3 days). However, when anti‐CD40L mb was combined with anti‐OX40L and anti‐CD122 mAbs, there was a considerable increase in the MST, which was 72.2 days. Compared to the isotype group, the 3‐combined group had significantly lesser proportion of memory T cells and greater proportion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the spleen. Meanwhile, in the 3‐combined group, the production of anti‐rat antibodies was markedly inhibited. Conclusion: Treatment with a combination of antibodies could significantly reverse the accelerated rejection mediated by donor‐reactive memory T cells by inhibiting cellular and humoral immune responses.     

Primed allospecific T cells prevent the effects of costimulatory blockade on prolonged cardiac allograft survival in mice.

Costimulatory blockade can induce long‐term allograft survival in naïve animals, but may not be as effective in animals with previously primed immune repertoires. We attempted to induce long‐term graft survival in B10.D2 recipients of B10.A cardiac allografts using donor‐specific transfusion (DST) plus anti‐CD40 ligand antibody (αCD40L). Recipients were either naïve mice, or mice previously primed to B10.A or third party alloantigens through engraftment and rejection of skin transplants. Untreated naïve mice rejected cardiac transplants by day 15 and contained a high frequency of primed, donor‐reactive T cells. Donor‐specific transfusion/αCD40L treatment of naïve animals induced long‐term graft survival associated with low frequencies of donor‐reactive T cells. Previous priming of donor‐specific T cells through rejection of B10.A, but not third party, skin grafts prevented the effects of DST/αCD40L on prolonging survival of B10.A hearts. Moreover, adoptive transfer of CD3+, CD4+ or CD8+ T cells from B10.A skin‐graft‐primed animals prevented the effects of DST/αCD40L. The data demonstrate that animals with immune repertoires containing previously primed, donor‐reactive T cells are resistant to the effects of costimulatory blockade. The findings have important implications for ongoing, costimulatory blockade‐based trials in humans, whose T‐cell repertoires are known to contain memory alloreactive T cells.     

CD8+ T‐Cell Depletion and Rapamycin Synergize with Combined Coreceptor/Stimulation Blockade to Induce Robust Limb Allograft Tolerance in Mice

The growing development of composite tissue allografts (CTA) highlights the need for tolerance induction protocols. Herein, we developed a mouse model of heterotopic limb allograft in a stringent strain combination in which potentially tolerogenic strategies were tested taking advantage of donor stem cells in the grafted limb. BALB/c allografts were transplanted into C57BL/6 mice treated with anti‐CD154 mAb, nondepleting anti‐CD4 combined to either depleting or nondepleting anti‐CD8 mAbs. Some groups received additional rapamycin. Both depleting and nondepleting mAb combinations without rapamycin only delayed limb allograft rejection, whereas the addition of rapamycin induced long‐term allograft survival in both combinations. Nevertheless, robust donor‐specific tolerance, defined by the acceptance of a fresh donor‐type skin allograft and simultaneous rejection of third‐party grafts, required initial CD8⁺ T‐cell depletion. Mixed donor‐recipient chimerism was observed in lymphoid organs and recipient bone marrow of tolerant but not rejecting animals. Tolerance specificity was confirmed by the inability to produce IL‐2, IFN‐γ and TNF‐α in MLC with donor antigen while significant alloreactivity persisted against third‐ party alloantigens. Collectively, these results show that robust CTA tolerance and mixed donor‐recipient chimerism can be achieved in response to the synergizing combination of rapamycin, transient CD8⁺ T‐cell depletion and costimulation/coreceptor blockade.     

Suppressing memory T cell activation induces islet allograft tolerance in alloantigen‐primed mice

Memory T cells are known to play a key role in prevention of allograft tolerance in alloantigen‐primed mice. Here, we used an adoptively transferred memory T cell model and an alloantigen‐primed model to evaluate the abilities of different combinations of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to block key signaling pathways involved in activation of effector and memory T cells. In the adoptively transferred model, the use of anti‐CD134L mAb effectively prevented activation of CD4⁺ memory T cells and significantly prolonged islet survival, similar to the action of anti‐CD122 mAb to CD8⁺ memory T cells. In the alloantigen‐primed model, use of anti‐CD134L and anti‐CD122 mAbs in addition to co‐stimulatory blockade with anti‐CD154 and anti‐LFA‐1 prolonged secondary allograft survival and significantly reduced the proportion of memory T cells; meanwhile, this combination therapy increased the proportion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the spleen, inhibited lymphocyte infiltration in the graft, and suppressed alloresponse of recipient splenic T cells. However, we also detected high levels of alloantibodies in the serum which caused high levels of damage to the allogeneic spleen cells. Our results suggest that combination of four mAbs can significantly suppress the function of memory T cells and prolong allograft survival in alloantigen primed animals.     

Murine Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Have a Lower Capacity than Bone Marrow to Induce Mixed Chimerism and Tolerance

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) under costimulation blockade allows induction of mixed chimerism and tolerance without global T‐cell depletion (TCD). The mildest such protocols without recipient cytoreduction, however, require clinically impracticable bone marrow (BM) doses. The successful use of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) instead of BM in such regimens would provide a substantial advance, allowing transplantation of higher doses of hematopoietic donor cells. We thus transplanted fully allogeneic murine granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) mobilized PBSC under costimulation blockade (anti‐CD40L and CTLA4Ig). Unexpectedly, PBSC did not engraft, even when very high cell doses together with nonmyeloablative total body irradiation (TBI) were used. We show that, paradoxically, T cells contained in the donor PBSC triggered rejection of the transplanted donor cells. Rejection of donor BM was also triggered by the cotransplantation of unmanipulated donor T cells isolated from naïve (nonmobilized) donors. Donor‐specific transfusion and transient immunosuppression prevented PBSC‐triggered rejection and mixed chimerism and tolerance were achieved, but graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) occurred. The combination of in vivo TCD with costimulation blockade prevented rejection and GVHD. Thus, if allogeneic PBSC are transplanted instead of BM, costimulation blockade alone does not induce chimerism and tolerance without unacceptable GVHD‐toxicity, and the addition of TCD is required for success.     

Combined Anti‐CD154/CTLA4Ig Costimulation Blockade‐Based Therapy Induces Donor‐Specific Tolerance to Vascularized Osteomyocutaneous Allografts

Tolerance induction by means of costimulation blockade has been successfully applied in solid organ transplantation; however, its efficacy in vascularized composite allotransplantation, containing a vascularized bone marrow component and thus a constant source of donor‐derived stem cells, remains poorly explored. In this study, osteomyocutaneous allografts (alloOMCs) from Balb/c (H2^d) mice were transplanted into C57BL/6 (H2^b) recipients. Immunosuppression consisted of 1 mg anti‐CD154 on day 0, 0.5 mg CTLA4Ig on day 2 and rapamycin (RPM; 3 mg/kg per day from days 0–7, then every other day for 3 weeks). Long‐term allograft survival, donor‐specific tolerance and donor–recipient cell trafficking were evaluated. Treatment with costimulation blockade plus RPM resulted in long‐term graft survival (>120 days) of alloOMC in 12 of 15 recipients compared with untreated controls (median survival time [MST] ≈10.2 ± 0.8 days), RPM alone (MST ≈33 ± 5.5 days) and costimulation blockade alone (MST ≈45.8 ± 7.1 days). Donor‐specific hyporesponsiveness in recipients with viable grafts was demonstrated in vitro. Evidence of donor‐specific tolerance was further assessed in vivo by secondary donor‐specific skin graft survival and third‐party graft rejection. A significant increase of Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells was evident in tolerant animals. Donor cells populated peripheral blood, thymus, and both donor and recipient bone marrow. Consequently, combined anti‐CD154/CTLA4Ig costimulation blockade‐based therapy induces donor‐specific tolerance in a stringent murine alloOMC transplant model.     

Role of T Cell Recruitment and Chemokine‐Regulated Intra‐Graft T Cell Motility Patterns in Corneal Allograft Rejection

Keratoplasty is the primary treatment to cure blindness due to corneal opacification. However, immune‐mediated rejection remains the leading cause of keratoplasty failure. Here, we utilize an in vivo imaging approach to monitor, track, and characterize in real‐time the recruitment of GFP‐labeled allo‐specific activated (Bonzo) T cells during corneal allograft rejection. We show that the recruitment of effector T cells to the site of transplantation determined the fate of corneal allografts, and that local intra‐graft production of CCL5 and CXCL9/10 regulated motility patterns of effector T cells in situ, and correlated with allograft rejection. We also show that different motility patterns associate with distinct in vivo phenotypes (round, elongated, and ruffled) of graft‐infiltrating effector T cells with varying proportions during progression of rejection. The ruffled phenotype was characteristic of activated effectors T cells and predominated during ongoing rejection, which associated with significantly increased T cell dynamics within the allografts. Importantly, CCR5/CXCR3 blockade decreased the motility, size, and number of infiltrating T cells and significantly prolonged allograft survival. Our findings indicate that chemokines produced locally within corneal allografts play an important role in the in situ activation and dynamic behavior of infiltrating effector T cells, and may guide targeted interventions to promote graft survival.     

Regulatory T Cells Are Critical to Tolerance Induction in Presensitized Mouse Transplant Recipients Through Targeting Memory T Cells

Memory T cells are a significant barrier to induction of transplant tolerance. However, reliable means to target alloreactive memory T cells have remained elusive. In this study, presensitization of BALB/c mice with C57BL/6 skin grafts generated a large number of OX40⁺CD44^hieffector/memory T cells and resulted in rapid rejection of donor heart allografts. Recognizing that anti‐OX40L monoclonal antibody (mAb) (α‐OX40L) monotherapy prolonged graft survival through inhibition and apoptosis of memory T cells in presensitized recipients, α‐OX40L was added to the combined treatment protocol of LF15–0195 (LF) and anti‐CD45RB (α‐CD45RB) mAb—a protocol that induced heart allograft tolerance in non‐presensitized recipients but failed to induce tolerance in presensitized recipients. Interestingly, this triple therapy restored donor‐specific heart allograft tolerance in our presensitized model that was associated with induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells and CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ T regulatory cells (Tregs). Of note, CD25⁺ T cell depletion in triple therapy recipients prevented establishment of allograft tolerance. In addition, adoptive transfer of donor‐primed effector/memory T cells into tolerant recipients markedly reduced levels of Tregs and broke tolerance. Our findings indicated that targeting memory T cells, by blocking OX40 costimulation in presensitized recipients was very important to expansion of Tregs, which proved critical to development of tolerance.     

LFA‐1 Antagonism Inhibits Early Infiltration of Endogenous Memory CD8 T Cells into Cardiac Allografts and Donor‐Reactive T Cell Priming

Alloreactive memory T cells are present in virtually all transplant recipients due to prior sensitization or heterologous immunity and mediate injury undermining graft outcome. In mouse models, endogenous memory CD8 T cells infiltrate MHC‐mismatched cardiac allografts and produce IFN‐γ in response to donor class I MHC within 24 h posttransplant. The current studies analyzed the efficacy of anti‐LFA‐1 mAb to inhibit early CD8 T cell cardiac allograft infiltration and activation. Anti‐LFA‐1 mAb given to C57BL/6 6 (H‐2^b) recipients of A/J (H‐2^a) heart grafts on days –1 and 0 completely inhibited CD8 T cell allograft infiltration, markedly decreased neutrophil infiltration and significantly reduced intragraft expression levels of IFN‐γ‐induced genes. Donor‐specific T cells producing IFN‐γ were at low/undetectable numbers in spleens of anti‐LFA‐1 mAb treated recipients until day 21. These effects combined to promote substantial prolongation (from day 8 to 27) in allograft survival. Delaying anti‐LFA‐1 mAb treatment until days 3 and 4 posttransplant did not inhibit early memory CD8 T cell infiltration and proliferation within the allograft. These data indicate that peritransplant anti‐LFA‐1 mAb inhibits early donor‐reactive memory CD8 T cell allograft infiltration and inflammation suggesting an effective strategy to attenuate the negative effects of heterologous immunity in transplant recipients.     

Different Mechanisms Control Peripheral and Central Tolerance in Hematopoietic Chimeric Mice

Regulatory T cells (Treg) are important in peripheral tolerance, but their role in establishing and maintaining hematopoietic mixed chimerism and generating central tolerance is unclear. We now show that costimulation blockade using a donor‐specific transfusion and anti‐CD154 antibody applied to mice given bone marrow and simultaneously transplanted with skin allografts leads to hematopoietic chimerism and permanent skin allograft survival. Chimeric mice bearing intact skin allografts fail to generate effector/memory T cells against allogeneic targets as shown by the absence of IFNγ‐producing CD44^highCD8⁺ T cells and in vivo cytotoxicity. Depletion of Tregs by injection of anti‐CD4 or anti‐CD25 antibody prior to costimulation blockade prevents chimerism, shortens skin allograft survival and leads to generation of effector/memory cytotoxic T cells. Depletion of Tregs by injection of anti‐CD4 or anti‐CD25 antibody two months after transplantation leads to loss of skin allografts even though mice remain chimeric and exhibit little in vivo cytotoxicity. In contrast, chimerism is lost, but skin allografts survive following naïve T‐cell injection. We conclude that hematopoietic chimerism and peripheral tolerance may be maintained by different mechanisms in mixed hematopoietic chimeras.     

B Cell Depletion With an Anti‐CD20 Antibody Enhances Alloreactive Memory T Cell Responses After Transplantation

Alloreactive memory T cells mediate accelerated allograft rejection and transplant tolerance resistance. Recent studies have shown that B cell deficient–μMT mice fail to mount donor‐specific memory T cell responses after transplantation. At the same time, other studies showed that pretransplant B cell depletion using rituximab (IgG1 anti‐CD20 mAb) combined with cyclosporine A promoted the survival of islet allografts in monkeys. In this study, we investigated the effect of anti‐CD20 antibody‐mediated B cell depletion on the memory T cell alloresponse in mice. Wild‐type and anti‐OVA TCR transgenic mice were treated with an IgG2a anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody, which depleted nearly all B cells in the peripheral blood and secondary lymphoid organs but spared some B cells in the bone marrow. B cell depletion did not affect the direct alloresponse but resulted in a marked increase of indirect alloresponse after skin transplantation of naïve mice. Furthermore, in allosensitized mice, anti‐CD20 mAb treatment enhanced the reactivation of allospecific memory T cells and accelerated second set rejection of skin allografts. This suggests that the effect of anti‐CD20 antibodies on alloimmunity and allograft rejection might vary upon the nature of the antibodies as well as the circumstances under which they are delivered.     

The immunobiology of pig‐to‐nonhuman primate islet xenotransplantation: insights,innovation, and impact

Previous studies of pig‐to‐non‐human primate (NHP) islet xenotransplantation have provided important insights into the immune recognition and effector pathways operative in this relevant preclinical model. The specifics of the xenograft product, microenvironment at the implantation site, and the immunosuppressive regimen significantly influence the mechanisms underlying the rejection of xenogeneic islets. Our current understanding of the immunological barriers to survival of pig islets in NHPs is largely based on studies on intraportal islet xenografts and on comparisons with islet allografts. The demonstration of cell‐mediated rejection of intraportal porcine islet xenografts at about 1 month posttransplant in monkeys immunosuppressed with the same protocols that prevent monkey islet allograft rejection indicates that islet xenograft rejection involves cellular mechanisms that are not present in acute islet allograft rejection. While these mechanisms remain poorly defined the demonstration of long‐term diabetes reversal after intraportal islet xenotransplantation in non‐human primates immunosuppressed with anti‐CD40L but not with anti‐CD40 antibody‐based protocols suggests that the therapeutic efficacy of anti‐CD40L in this transplantation setting likely involves the depletion of donor‐reactive, activated T cells besides CD40:CD40L costimulation blockade. Rejection of intraportal islet xenografts in NHPs immunosuppressed with CTLA4‐Ig and rapamycin was mediated largely by IL‐15‐primed, CXCR3+CD8+ memory T cells recruited by IP‐10 (CXCL10) positive pig islets and macrophages that showed staining for IL‐12 and iNOS. Adding basiliximab induction and tacrolimus maintenance therapy to this protocol prevented rejection in 24 of 26 recipients followed for up to 275 days. Comparison of both groups suggests, though by no means conclusive, that prolongation of graft survival in this large cohort was associated with reduced direct T cell responses to xenoantigens, reduced proportion of intrahepatic (intragraft) B cells and IFN‐γ+ and IL‐17+ CD4 and CD8 T cells, and increased local production of immunoregulatory molecules linked with Tregs, including TGF‐β, Foxp3, HO‐1, and IL‐10. Anti‐pig non‐Gal IgG antibody elicitation was suppressed in both groups. We are currently exploring the concept of negative vaccination to markedly minimize the need for immunosuppression in islet xenotransplantation. Peritransplant administration of donor apoptotic cells extended pig‐to‐mouse islet xenograft survival to >250 days when combined with peritransplant B cell‐depletion and rapamycin. This costimulation blockade‐sparing, antigen‐specific immunotherapy is expected to cause rapid pretransplant clonal deletion of indirect and anergy of direct xenospecific T cells while inducing regulatory T cells. As anti‐CD40L antibodies, B cell depleting antibodies are expected to interfere with indirect antigen presentation, costimulation, and cytokine production required for optimal T cell proliferation, memory formation, and intragraft CD8+ effector function. It is conceivable that additional strategies must be employed in NHPs and eventually in diabetic patients to achieve – as previously with anti‐CD40L antibodies – more complete, yet selective depletion of donor‐reactive, activated T‐cells for the purpose of stable xenograft acceptance.     

Peritransplant VLA‐4 blockade inhibits endogenous memory CD8 T cell infiltration into high‐risk cardiac allografts and CTLA‐4Ig resistant rejection

Recipient endogenous memory CD8 T cells expressing reactivity to donor class I MHC infiltrate MHC‐mismatched cardiac allografts within 24 hours after reperfusion and express effector functions mediating graft injury. The current study tested the efficacy of Very Late Antigen‐4 (VLA‐4) blockade to inhibit endogenous memory CD8 T cell infiltration into cardiac allografts and attenuate early posttransplant inflammation. Peritransplant anti‐VLA‐4 mAb given to C57BL6 (H‐2^b) recipients of AJ (H‐2^a) heart allografts completely inhibited endogenous memory CD4 and CD8 T cell infiltration with significant decrease in macrophage, but not neutrophil, infiltration into allografts subjected to either minimal or prolonged cold ischemic storage (CIS) prior to transplant, reduced intra‐allograft IFN‐γ‐induced gene expression and prolonged survival of allografts subjected to prolonged CIS in CTLA‐4Ig treated recipients. Anti‐VLA‐4 mAb also inhibited priming of donor‐specific T cells producing IFN‐γ until at least day 7 posttransplant. Peritransplant anti‐VLA plus anti‐CD154 mAb treatment similarly prolonged survival of allografts subjected to minimal or increased CIS prior to transplant. Overall, these data indicate that peritransplant anti‐VLA‐4 mAb inhibits early infiltration memory CD8 T cell infiltration into allografts with a marked reduction in early graft inflammation suggesting an effective strategy to attenuate negative effects of heterologous alloimmunity in recipients of higher risk grafts.     

The Programmed Death (PD)‐1/PD‐Ligand 1 Pathway Regulates Graft‐Versus‐Host‐Reactive CD8 T Cells After Liver Transplantation

Acute graft‐versus‐host disease (aGVHD) is a life‐threatening complication after solid‐organ transplantation, which is mediated by host‐reactive donor T cells emigrating from the allograft. We report on two liver transplant recipients who developed an almost complete donor chimerism in peripheral blood and bone marrow‐infiltrating T cells during aGVHD. By analyzing these T cells directly ex vivo, we found that they died by apoptosis over time without evidence of rejection by host T cells. The host‐versus‐donor reactivity was selectively impaired, as anti‐third‐party and antiviral T cells were still detectable in the host repertoire. These findings support the acquired donor‐specific allotolerance concept previously established in animal transplantation studies. We also observed that the resolution of aGVHD was not accompanied by an expansion of circulating immunosuppressive CD4/CD25/FoxP3‐positive T cells. In fact, graft‐versus‐host‐reactive T cells were controlled by an alternative negative regulatory pathway, executed by the programmed death (PD)‐1 receptor and its ligand PD‐L1. We found high PD‐1 expression on donor CD4 and CD8 T cells. In addition, blocking PD‐L1 on host‐derived cells significantly enhanced alloreactivity by CD8 T cells in vitro. We suggest the interference with the PD‐1/PD‐L1 pathway as a therapeutic strategy to control graft‐versus‐host‐reactive T cells in allograft recipients.     

Primed CD8+ T-Cell Responses to Allogeneic Endothelial Cells Are Controlled by Local Complement Activation

CD8 T cells primed by transplantation recognize allogeneic class I MHC molecules expressed on graft vascular endothelium and contribute to allograft injury. We previously showed that immune cell-derived complement activation fragments are integral to T cell activation/expansion. Herein we tested the impact of local complement production/activation on T cell/endothelial cell (EC) interactions. We found that proinflammatory cytokines upregulated alternative pathway complement production by ECs, yielding C5a. We further found that ECs deficient in the cell surface C3/C5 convertase regulator decay accelerating factor (DAF, CD55) induced greater CD8 T-cell proliferation and more IFNγ⁺ and perforin⁺ effector cells than wild-type (WT) ECs. Allogeneic C3^−/− EC induced little or no CD8 responses. Abrogation of responses following C5a receptor (C5aR) blockade, or augmentation following addition of recombinant C5a demonstrated that the effects were mediated through T-cell-expressed-C5aR interactions. Analyses of in vivo CD8 cell responses to transplanted heart grafts deficient in EC DAF showed similar augmentation. The findings reveal that EC-derived complement triggers secondary CD8 T-cell differentiation and expansion and argue that targeting complement and/or C5aR could limit T-cell-mediated graft injury.