Trajectories of Alcohol Consumption Following Liver Transplantation

Any use of alcohol in the years following liver transplantation (LTX) approaches 50% of patients transplanted for alcoholic liver disease (ALD). We collected detailed prospective data on alcohol consumption following LTX for ALD to investigate ongoing patterns of use. Using trajectory modeling we identified four distinct alcohol use trajectories. One group had minimal use over time. Two other groups developed early onset moderate‐to‐heavy consumption and one group developed late onset moderate use. These trajectories demonstrate that alcohol use varies based on timing of onset, quantity and duration. Using discriminant function analysis, we examine characteristics of recipient's pre‐LTX alcohol histories and early post‐LTX psychological stressors to identify the profile of those at risk for these specific trajectories. We discuss the relevance of these findings to clinical care and preliminarily to outcomes.     

The Munich-LTX-Score: predictor for survival after lung transplantation

Huppmann P, Neurohr C, Leuschner S, Leuchte H, Baumgartner R, Zimmermann G, Meis T, von Wulffen W, Überfuhr P, Hatz R, Frey L, Behr J for the Munich Lung Transplant Group (MLTG). The Munich‐LTX‐Score: predictor for survival after lung transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2012: 26: 173–183.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: The purpose of this study was to create a prognostic score calculated one yr after LTX based on post‐transplant factors inclusive of donor and recipient characteristics that could be used to predict long‐term survival in patients after lung transplantation (LTX). Methods: Uni‐ and multivariate analysis in 206 consecutive LTX patients identified independent risk factors for post‐transplant mortality and onset of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Munich‐LTX‐Score is devised by summing up each identified risk factor. Results: Multivariate analyses revealed acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, donor age ≥55 yr, and HLA‐A ≥ 2‐/DR ≥ 2 mismatch and single LTX to be independent negative predictors for long‐term survival (p < 0.05). Munich‐LTX‐Score identified three discrete groups: low‐, moderate‐, and high risk. The actuarial five‐yr survival after score calculation one yr after LTX of the entire cohort was 58%, compared with 91% in low‐, 54% in moderate‐, and 0% in the high‐risk group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Within our cohort of patients calculation of the Munich‐LTX‐Score, consisting of donor‐, recipient‐, and post‐transplant characteristics, one yr after LTX allowed to predict long‐term survival of lung transplant recipients. After prospective validation, this score could identify patients who may benefit from intensified surveillance after LTX.     

Early Treatment of Depressive Symptoms and Long‐Term Survival After Liver Transplantation

While depression after liver transplantation (LTX) is associated with decreased survival, the effects of treating depression remain unknown. We assessed a previously described, prospective cohort of 167 patients transplanted for alcohol‐related liver disease from 1998 to 2003. Depressive symptoms were measured with the Beck Depression Inventory serially throughout the first posttransplant year. Adequacy of antidepressant treatment was measured with the Antidepressant Treatment History Form. Using Cox‐proportional Hazards modeling, survival times were assessed for recipients with no depression versus depression with adequate medications versus depression with inadequate medications. Seventy‐two recipients had depressive symptoms in the first posttransplant year. Of these, 43% (n = 31) received adequate pharmacotherapy and 57% (n = 41) received inadequate (n = 7) or no pharmacotherapy (n = 34). After a median follow‐up time of 9.5 years, 32% of the inadequately treated depressed group survived versus 52% of the adequately treated group and 56% of the nondepressed group (p = 0.006). Compared to the nondepressed group, those with adequately treated depression had no significant difference in survival. However, recipients with depression and inadequate pharmacotherapy had decreased survival times compared to nondepressed recipients (HR for death = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.45, 4.11), controlling for other known confounders. The factor most strongly linked to long‐term mortality after liver transplantation in this cohort was untreated depression.     

Liver transplantation for fulminant and subfulminant hepatic failure

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term course and outcome after liver transplantation (LTX) for fulminant/subfulminant hepatic failure (FSHF) to determine which factors relate to outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1990 and October 2002, 30 adult patients with FSHF underwent LTX. King's College criteria were used to decide which patients needed LTX. Pretransplantation parameters (age, sex, degree of hepatic encephalopathy, etiology, and time between onset of symptoms and LTX) were examined as risk factors for LTX outcome. RESULTS: Mean age at LTX was 40.4+/-13.9 years and 46.7% were men. The most frequent causes of FSHF were virus B in 23.3%, autoimmune hepatitis in 23.3%, and cryptogenic in 20%. Fifty percent of the patients with a survival longer than 15 days suffered episodes of acute rejection; chronic rejection occurred in 25%. One- and five-year patient and allograft survival rates for FSHF were 56.3% and 54.7%, respectively. Autoimmune hepatitis was the only factor associated with better posttransplantation outcome, although there were no differences in posttransplant course. Patient survival rates increased during the study period. During the first 5 years (1990-1995) the survival rates were 53.3% (1-year and 5-year), whereas they were 60% at 1 and 5 years in the second interval (1996-2002). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate of FSHF is high during the first year post-LTX. LTX for FSHF of autoimmune etiology showed better outcomes with increasing patient survival rates during the study period.     

肝脏移植对23例肝细胞性肝癌的治疗价值研究

目的进一步探讨肝细胞性肝癌肝移植治疗的疗效 ,评价其应用价值。方法对 1999年 2月～ 2 0 0 2年 3月连续实施的 95例肝移植中的 2 3例肝细胞肝癌患者进行随访和回顾性分析 ,探讨肝细胞性肝癌临床病理学因素对肝移植术后生存率和肝癌复发的影响。结果本组肝细胞性肝癌总的复发率为 6 5 % (15 /2 3) ,6个月、12个月的无癌生存率分别为 75 %、5 8%。多元分析表明 ,肝细胞性肝癌的直径与它的复发率有相关性 (P =0 0 2 4 ) ,而其他的临床病理学因素未显示有统计学意义(Wald =5 113,P =0 0 2 4 )。而年龄、性别、癌灶数目、门静脉癌栓形成、TNM分期、术前AFP水平、术前治疗、合并肝硬化等病理学因素则在统计学上未显示有显著意义 (P >0 0 5 )。结论大肝癌是肝移植的相对禁忌证 ,而小肝癌是肝移植的良好适应证     

Prognostic Significance of 1‐Year Serum Albumin Levels Within the Normal Range After Kidney Transplantation

Hypoalbuminemia is associated with poor outcomes in kidney transplantation (KT). However, what level is optimal in serum albumin is not clear for the long‐term prognosis. To determine whether the long‐term outcomes are different even between the normal ranges of serum albumin after KT, we analyzed data from 404 renal allograft recipients whose 1‐year post‐transplant serum albumin levels were within the normal limits (3.5–5.5 g/dL). During a follow‐up of 122 ± 56 months, 97 graft losses, 20 patient deaths, and 50 cardiovascular (CV) events occurred. Based on 1‐year serum albumin levels, the patients were divided into high normal (≥4.6 g/dL, n = 209) and low normal (<4.6 g/dL, n = 195) groups. Kaplan–Meier analyses revealed that the low normal group had poorer allograft survival (P = 0.01), patient survival (P < 0.001), and CV event‐free survival (P < 0.001) than the high normal group. Cox regression analysis confirmed that 1‐year serum albumin was inversely associated with the risk of graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] 0.414, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.200–0.856), patient death (HR 0.097, 95% CI 0.019–0.484), and CV events (HR 0.228, 95% CI 0.074–0.702). In conclusion, a relatively low 1‐year post‐transplant serum albumin level within the normal limits (<4.6 g/dL) significantly predicts poor long‐term outcomes.     

Liver Transplantation Outcome in Patients With Angiographically Proven Coronary Artery Disease: A Multi‐Institutional Study

Over the last decade the age of liver transplant (LT) recipients and the likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) in this population have increased. There are no multicenter studies that have examined the impact of CAD on LT outcomes. In this historical cohort study, we identified adult LT recipients who underwent angiography prior to transplantation at seven institutions over a 12‐year period. For each patient we recorded demographic data, recipient and donor risk factors, duration of follow‐up, the presence of angiographically proven obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) and post‐LT survival. Obstructive CAD was present in 151 of 630 patients, the CAD(+) group. Nonobstructive CAD was found in 479 patients, the CAD(?) group. Patient survival was similar for the CAD(+) group (adjusted HR 1.13, CI = [0.79, 1.62], p = 0.493) compared to the CAD(?) group. The CAD(+) patients were further stratified into severe (CADsev, >70% stenosis, n = 96), and moderate CAD (CADmod, 50–70% stenosis, n = 55) groups. Survival for the CADsev (adjusted HR = 1.26, CI = [0.83, 1.91], p = 0.277) and CADmod (adjusted HR = 0.93, CI = [0.52, 1.66], p = 0.797) groups were similar to the CAD(?) group. We conclude that when current CAD treatment strategies are employed prior to transplant, post‐LT survival is not significantly different between patients with and without obstructive CAD.     

One Size Does Not Fit All—Regional Variation in the Impact of the Share 35 Liver Allocation Policy

Allocation policies for liver transplantation underwent significant changes in June 2013 with the introduction of Share 35. We aimed to examine the effect of Share 35 on regional variation in posttransplant outcomes. We examined two patient groups from the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset; a pre–Share 35 group composed of patients transplanted between June 17, 2012, and June 17, 2013 (n = 5523), and a post–Share group composed of patients transplanted between June 18, 2013, and June 18, 2014 (n = 5815). We used Kaplan–Meier and Cox multivariable analyses to compare survival. There were significant increases in allocation Model for End‐stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, laboratory MELD scores, and proportions of patients in the intensive care unit and on mechanical, ventilated, or organ‐perfusion support at transplant post–Share 35. We also observed a significant increase in donor risk index in this group. We found no difference on a national level in survival between patients transplanted pre–Share 35 and post–Share 35 (p = 0.987). Regionally, however, posttransplantation survival was significantly worse in the post–Share 35 patients in regions 4 and 10 (p = 0.008 and p = 0.04), with no significant differences in the remaining regions. These results suggest that Share 35 has been associated with transplanting “sicker patients” with higher MELD scores, and although no difference in survival is observed on a national level, outcomes appear to be concerning in some regions.     

Lung transplantation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Whitson BA, Shelstad RC, Hertz MI, Kelly RF, D’Cunha J, Shumway SJ. Lung transplantation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2011.01482.x.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Introduction: Pulmonary insufficiency following bone marrow transplant (BMT) is common and has significant associated mortality. Lung transplantation (LTX) is the only viable treatment for patients with end‐stage pulmonary disease, but LTX after BMT is an uncommon event given the medical candidacy of the potential recipients. We sought to evaluate the short‐ and long‐term outcomes of LTX in BMT recipients. Methods: We performed a retrospective evaluation of our institution’s longitudinal LTX and BMT databases. Demographic and outcomes variables were collected. Results: We identified 639 LTX from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2009, and 5525 BMT from program inception, March 21, 1974, through December 31, 2009. From the cross‐referenced cohort, we identified four patients who had BMT followed by LTX. Our series was composed of two men and two women, with a mean age of 32.3 yr (range, 20–59 yr). Single LTX were performed in two recipients (50%). All patients had significant and expected morbidities related to their transplant immunosuppression. Three patients (75%) required cardiopulmonary bypass at the time of LTX. The two recipients who underwent bilateral LTX required open chest management and subsequent tracheostomy. All patients are still alive at follow‐up (range, 19–119 months, median 39.5). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that LTX in the setting of BMT is a high‐risk operation with the potential for a tumultuous perioperative course. Despite this, good outcomes and survival are obtainable in carefully selected patients. Selection factors include clinically stable patients without active sepsis and preoperative optimization of nutrition in anticipation of a prolonged recovery. An experienced multidisciplinary team approach and a protocol‐driven management plan are paramount for successful outcomes in this challenging population.     

Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease in lung transplantation: A nested case‐control study

Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) may compromise long‐term outcome of lung transplant (LTx) recipients. A case‐control study was performed, comparing LTx recipients with PTLD (n=31) to matched recipients without PTLD (Controls, n=62). Risk factors for PTLD and post‐transplant outcomes were assessed. PTLD prevalence was 3.9%, time to PTLD 323 (166‐1132) days; and 54.8% had early‐onset PTLD versus 45.2% late‐onset PTLD. At LTx, more Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV)‐seronegative patients were present in PTLD (42%) compared to Controls (5%) (P<.0001); most of whom had undergone EBV seroconversion upon PTLD diagnosis. EBV viral load was higher in PTLD versus Controls (P<.0001). Overall, lower hemoglobin and higher C‐reactive protein levels were present in PTLD versus Controls (P<.0001). EBV status at LTx (P=.0073) and EBV viral load at PTLD (P=.0002) were the most important risk determinates for later PTLD. Patients with PTLD demonstrated shorter time to onset of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) (P=.0006) and poorer 5‐year survival post‐LTx (66.6% versus 91.5%), resulting in worse CLAD‐free survival (HR 2.127, 95%CI 1.006‐4.500; P=.0483) and overall survival (HR 3.297 95%CI 1.473‐7.382; P=.0037) compared to Controls. Late‐onset PTLD had worse survival compared to early‐onset PTLD (P=.021). Primary EBV infection is a risk for PTLD; which is associated with worse long‐term outcome post‐LTx.     

Pulmonary thromboembolism as a complication of lung transplantation

Post‐transplantation mortality after lung transplantation (LTX) is higher than for other solid organ transplantations. Thoracic surgery is associated with increased risk of thromboembolic complications, and as LTX recipients lack the collateral bronchial circulation, pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) may represent a pertinent yet largely underdiagnosed cause of post‐transplantation respiratory failure. In this systematic review, we sought to elucidate the occurrence and predilection site of PTE after LTX, and its potential impact on LTX‐associated mortality. Based on twelve original articles identified by a systematic search strategy in PubMed, we found that PTE was reported in 4% of LTX recipients, and 38% of these events occurred within the first 30 days after the LTX procedure. In single‐lung transplantation (SLTX) recipients, 12% were diagnosed with PTE, with 92% of these affecting the allograft. Of LTX patients diagnosed with PTE, 11% died within 1 year after LTX and 75% of these deaths occurred within the first 30 days. Our findings suggest that PTE is a potentially underdiagnosed cause of early post‐LTX respiratory failure. This should be confirmed in larger studies with systematic follow‐up diagnostic imaging.     

First‐Degree Living‐Related Donor Liver Transplantation in Autoimmune Liver Diseases

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end‐stage autoimmune liver diseases. However, the underlying disease may recur in the graft in some 20% of cases. The aim of this study is to determine whether LT using living donor grafts from first‐degree relatives results in higher rates of recurrence than grafts from more distant/unrelated donors. Two hundred sixty‐three patients, who underwent a first LT in the Toronto liver transplant program between January 2000 and March 2015 for autoimmune liver diseases, and had at least 6 months of post‐LT follow‐up, were included in this study. Of these, 72 (27%) received a graft from a first‐degree living‐related donor, 56 (21%) from a distant/unrelated living donor, and 135 (51%) from a deceased donor for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (n = 138, 52%), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) (n = 69, 26%), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n = 44, 17%), and overlap syndromes (n = 12, 5%). Recurrence occurred in 52 (20%) patients. Recurrence rates for each autoimmune liver disease were not significantly different after first‐degree living‐related, living‐unrelated, or deceased‐donor LT. Similarly, time to recurrence, recurrence‐related graft failure, graft survival, and patient survival were not significantly different between groups. In conclusion, first‐degree living‐related donor LT for PSC, PBC, or AIH is not associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence.     

Lung transplantation in patients with scleroderma: case series, review of the literature, and criteria for transplantation

Abstract: Backgrounds: The use of lung transplantation (LTX) to treat respiratory failure because of scleroderma is controversial. We present our experience, review the current literature, and suggest specific criteria for LTX in scleroderma. Of the 174 patients who underwent LTX at our center, seven (4%) had scleroderma‐associated respiratory failure. Patients and methods: A MEDLINE search of the English literature was performed for studies of LTX in patients with scleroderma between 1986 and 2006. A Kaplan–Meier survival curve was calculated over the time of the studies. Results: The MEDLINE search yielded one large review and four small case series. The small case series were included in the review. The review and our series yield a total of 54 patients. Mean patient age was 47.1 yr; 59.3% were female. Pre‐operative lung data were available for 24 patients: 22 (92%) had pulmonary fibrosis and 17 (71%) had pulmonary hypertension. Most patients (69%) underwent single‐lung transplantation. Mean forced expiratory volume at one s after LTX was 67% (range 56–87%). There was no difference in infection and rejection rates between the patients with scleroderma and other LTX recipients. The two‐ and five‐yr survival rates were 72% and 55%, respectively. Conclusions: LTX is a valid option in well‐selected patients with scleroderma and pulmonary fibrosis, yielding good pulmonary function and acceptable morbidity and mortality.     

Liver transplantation in patients over 60 and 65 years: an evaluation of long-term outcomes and survival.

With increased demand for liver transplantation (LT), outcomes of older recipients have been subjected to greater scrutiny, as previous studies have demonstrated poorer survival outcomes. Outcomes of 77 patients aged>65 yr (group 1) who underwent transplantation between 1988 and 2003 at King's College Hospital, London, were compared with all recipients aged between 60 and 64 yr (group 2, n=137) and 202 time-matched control patients with chronic liver disease aged between 18-59 yr (group 3). Patient survival at 30-days for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 99%, 94%, and 94%, respectively (P=not significant [NS]). At 1-yr, survival in the 3 groups was 82%, 86%, and 83%, respectively (P=NS), and at 5-yr patient survival was comparable (73%, 80%, and 78%, respectively) (P=NS). Episodes of acute cellular rejection (ACR) were fewer in the older cohorts (43% vs. 45% vs. 61%, P=0.0016), although there was no significant difference identified in the numbers of patients in each group who experienced ACR (P=0.16). A similar but nonsignificant trend was identified for rates of chronic rejection among the groups. In conclusion, these data suggest that survival of patients over 60 and 65 yr undergoing LT is satisfactory, at least in the first 5-yr posttransplantation. In addition, patients over 65 yr experience less rejection, with good graft survival. Thus, LT should not be denied to patients>65 yr on the basis of age alone, once a comprehensive screen for comorbidity has been undertaken.     

Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Acute‐on‐Chronic Liver Failure in High–Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease Score Patients

The large volume of adult living donor liver transplantations (ALDLTs) at our center affords a unique opportunity to examine the impact of acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) among high–Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease MELD score patients. From February 1998 to March 2010, 1958 cirrhotic recipients were analyzed to study the relationship between MELD scores and ALDLT outcomes. A total of 327 high‐MELD score recipients were categorized into ACLF and non‐ACLF groups, and their outcomes were compared. The 5‐year graft and patient survival in the high‐MELD group were 75.2% and 76.4%, respectively, which were significantly worse than the low and intermediate MELD groups. The presence of ACLF associated with higher MELD scores appeared to be the dominant factor responsible for the inferior results of patients with MELD score of 30–34 points. The 5‐year graft survivals in the ACLF group was 70.5% and in the non‐ACLF group it was 81.0% (p = 0.035). Therefore, ALDLT should be performed as soon as possible in high‐MELD score patients prior to ACLF development. Moreover, ACLF patients should be separately categorized when analyzing the outcomes of ALDLT. ALDLT for ACLF patients should not be discouraged because favorable outcomes can be expected through timely ALDLT and comprehensive management.     

The Long‐Term Benefit of Liver Transplantation for Hepatic Metastases From Neuroendocrine Tumors

Selection criteria and benefit of liver transplantation for hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) remain uncertain. Eighty‐eight consecutive patients with metastatic NETs eligible for liver transplantation according to Milan‐NET criteria were offered transplant (n = 42) versus nontransplant options (n = 46) depending on list dynamics, patient disposition, and age. Tumor burden between groups did not differ. Transplant patients were younger (40.5 vs. 55.5 years; p < 0.001). Long‐term outcomes were compared after matching between groups made on multiple Cox models adjusted for propensity score built on logistic models. Survival benefit was the difference in mean survival between transplant versus nontransplant options. No patients were lost or died without recurrence. Median follow‐up was 122 months. The transplant group showed a significant advantage over nontransplant strategies at 5 and 10 years in survival (97.2% and 88.8% vs. 50.9% and 22.4%, respectively; p < 0.001) and time‐to‐progression (13.1% and 13.1% vs. 83.5% and 89%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for propensity score, survival advantage of the transplant group was significant (hazard ratio = 7.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4–23.0; p = 0.001). Adjusted transplant‐related survival benefit was 6.82 months (95% CI: 1.10–12.54; p = 0.019) and 38.43 months (95% CI: 21.41–55.45; p < 0.001) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Liver transplantation for metastatic NETs under restrictive criteria provides excellent long‐term outcome. Transplant‐related survival benefit increases over time and maximizes after 10 years.     

Liver Transplantation with Grafts from Controlled Donors after Cardiac Death: A 20‐Year Follow‐up at a Single Center

The first liver transplantation (LTx) in Sweden was performed in 1984, but brain death as a legal death criterion was not accepted until 1988. Between November 1984 and May 1988, we performed 40 consecutive LTxs in 32 patients. Twenty‐four grafts were from donors after cardiac death (DCD) and 16 grafts from heart‐beating donors (HBD). Significantly, more hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary complications occurred in the DCD group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Graft and patient survival did not differ between the groups. In the total group, there was a significant difference in graft survival between first‐time LTx grafts and grafts used for retransplantation. There was better graft survival in nonmalignant than malignant patients, although this did not reach statistical significance. Multivariate analysis revealed cold ischemia time and post‐LTx peak ALT to be independent predictive factors for graft survival in the DCD group. In the 11 livers surviving 20 years or more, follow‐up biopsies were performed 18–20 years post‐LTx (n = 10) and 6 years post‐LTx (n = 1). Signs of chronic rejection were seen in three cases, with no difference between DCD and HBD. Our analysis with a 20‐year follow‐up suggests that controlled DCD liver grafts might be a feasible option to increase the donor pool.     

Lung transplantation in children

OBJECTIVE: To report the authors' experience with pediatric lung transplantation (LTX) to provide an overview of patients selected for this procedure and their outcomes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pediatric LTX differs from adults in many ways, including recipient size, indications, posttransplant care, and rehabilitation. METHODS: Two hundred seven isolated lung transplants on 190 children under the age of 18 years were performed from 1990 to the present. This represents the single largest series of lung transplants in children in the world. Thirty-two patients were less than 1 year of age, 22 were 1 to 5 years of age, 32 were 5 to 10 years of age, and 121 were 10 to 18 years old. The groups by major diagnostic category were cystic fibrosis (n = 89), pulmonary vascular disease (n = 44), bronchiolitis obliterans (n = 21), pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (n = 12), pulmonary fibrosis (n = 15), and other (n = 26). The average age at the time of transplant was 9.5 +/- 5.9 years (range 36 days to 18 years). RESULTS: Survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 77% at 1 year, 62% at 3 years, and 55% at 5 years. There was no significant difference in survival according to primary diagnosis leading to LTX or age at LTX. There were 25 early (<60 days) and 61 late deaths. The most common cause of early deaths was graft failure (13/25, 52%). The most common causes of late death were bronchiolitis obliterans (35/61, 57%), infection (13/61, 21%), and posttransplant malignancies (11/61, 18%). No patient died of acute rejection. In those surviving greater than 3 months (mean follow-up 3.5 years, range 3 months to 11 years), the overall rate of occurrence of bronchiolitis obliterans was 46% (80/175) and the overall incidence of posttransplant malignancies was 24/175 (14%). Major risk factors for the development of bronchiolitis obliterans were age older than 3 years, more than two episodes of acute rejection, and organ ischemic time longer than 180 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: In children, LTX is a high-risk but viable treatment for end-stage pulmonary parenchymal and vascular disease. The major hurdle to overcome in long-term survival is bronchiolitis obliterans.     

Long‐Term Outcomes of Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Japan: An Analysis of More Than 2200 Cases Listed in the Registry of the Japanese Liver Transplantation Society

The Japanese Liver Transplantation Society (JLTS) was established in 1980 in order to characterize and follow trends in patient characteristics and graft survival among all liver transplant patients in Japan. This study analyzed the comprehensive factors that may influence the outcomes of pediatric patients who undergo living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) by evaluating the largest cohort in the world. Between November 1989 and December 2010, 2224 pediatric patients underwent LDLT in Japan. There were 998 male (44.9%) and 1226 female donors (55.1%) without donor mortalities related to transplant surgery. There were 946 male (42.5%) and 1278 female (57.5%) recipients with a median age of 4.0 years (range: 13 days to 17.9 years). Cholestatic liver disease was the leading indication for LDLT (n = 1649; 76.2%), followed by metabolic disorders (n = 194; 8.7%), acute liver failure (n = 192; 8.6%) and neoplastic liver disease (n = 66; 3.0%). The 1‐, 5‐, 10‐ and 20‐year patient survival rates were 88.3%, 85.4%, 82.8% and 79.6%, respectively. Blood‐type incompatibility, recipient age, etiology of liver disease and transplant era were found to be significant predictors of overall survival. We are able to achieve satisfactory long‐term pediatric patient survival outcomes in the JLTS series without compromising the living donors.     

Potential functional and survival benefit of double over single lung transplantation for selected patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a frequent indication for lung transplantation (LTX) with pulmonary hypertension (PH) negatively affecting outcome. The optimal procedure type remains a debated topic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pretransplant PH in IPF patients. Single LTX (SLTX, n = 46) was the standard procedure type. Double LTX (DLTX, n = 30) was only performed in cases of relevant PH or additional suppurative lung disease. There was no significant difference for pretransplant clinical parameters. Preoperative mean pulmonary arterial pressure was significantly higher in DLTX recipients (22.7 ± 0.8 mmHg vs. 35.9 ± 1.8 mmHg, P < 0.001). After transplantation, 6‐min‐walk distance and BEST‐FEV₁ were significantly higher for DLTX patients (6‐MWD: 410 ± 25 m vs. 498 ± 23 m, P = 0.02; BEST‐FEV₁: 71.2 ± 3.0 (% pred) vs. 86.2 ± 4.2 (% pred), P = 0.004). Double LTX recipients demonstrated a significantly better 1‐year‐, overall‐ and Bronchiolitis obliterans Syndrome (BOS)‐free survival (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis confirmed SLTX to be a significant predictor for death and BOS. Single LTX offers acceptable survival rates for IPF patients. Double LTX provides a significant benefit in selected recipients. Our data warrant further trials of SLTX versus DLTX stratifying for potential confounders including PH.