Sotrastaurin,a Novel Small Molecule Inhibiting Protein Kinase C: First Clinical Results in Renal‐Transplant Recipients

Sotrastaurin, a novel protein‐kinase‐C inhibitor, blocks early T‐cell activation. In this 12‐month, Phase II study, de novo renal‐transplant patients were randomized to sotrastaurin (200 mg b.i.d.) + standard‐exposure tacrolimus (SET) or reduced‐exposure tacrolimus (RET) (SET: n = 76; RET: n = 66), or control (SET + mycophenolic acid [MPA, 720 mg b.i.d.]; n = 74). In both sotrastaurin groups, patients were converted from tacrolimus to MPA after Month 3, achieving calcineurin inhibitor‐free immunosuppression. The primary endpoint was composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection, graft loss, death or loss to follow‐up). The key secondary endpoint was glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Composite efficacy failure rates were: 4.1%, 5.4% and 1.5% at Month 3 (preconversion) and 7.8%, 44.8% and 34.1% at study end in the control, sotrastaurin + SET and sotrastaurin + RET groups, respectively; these results led to premature study discontinuation. Median GFR at Month 6 was: 57.0, 53.0 and 60.0 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. Study‐drug discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 16.2%, 18.4% and 12.1%, respectively. Leukopenia and neutropenia occurred more frequently preconversion in control versus sotrastaurin groups: 13.7%, 5.6%, and 4.6%; and 11.1%, 4.3% and 3.1%, respectively. The initial sotrastaurin + tacrolimus regimen was efficacious and well tolerated but the postconversion sotrastaurin + MPA regimen showed inadequate efficacy. Longer‐term evaluation of sotrastaurin + tacrolimus is warranted.     

Protein Kinase C Inhibitor Sotrastaurin in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Phase II Trial

Efficacy and safety of protein kinase C inhibitor sotrastaurin (STN) with tacrolimus (TAC) was assessed in a 24‐month, multicenter, phase II study in de novo liver transplant recipients. A total of 204 patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to STN 200 mg b.i.d. + standard‐exposure TAC (n = 50) or reduced‐exposure TAC (n = 52), STN 300 mg b.i.d. + reduced‐exposure TAC (n = 50), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1 g b.i.d. + standard‐exposure TAC (control, n = 52); all with steroids. Owing to premature study termination, treatment comparisons were only conducted for Month 6. At Month 6, composite efficacy failure rates (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection episodes of Banff grade ≥1, graft loss, or death) were 25.0%, 16.5%, 20.9% and 15.9% for STN 200 mg + standard TAC, STN 200 mg + reduced TAC, STN 300 mg + reduced TAC and control groups, respectively. Median estimated glomerular filtration rates were 84.0, 83.3, 81.1 and 75.3 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. Gastrointestinal events (constipation, diarrhea, and nausea), infection, and tachycardia were more frequent in STN groups. More patients in STN groups experienced serious adverse events compared with the control group (62.3–70.8% vs. 51.9%). STN‐based regimens were associated with a higher efficacy failure rate and higher incidence of adverse events with no significant difference in renal function between the groups.     

Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Different Prolonged‐Release Tacrolimus Regimens—The DIAMOND Study

DIAMOND: multicenter, 24‐week, randomized trial investigating the effect of different once‐daily, prolonged‐release tacrolimus dosing regimens on renal function after de novo liver transplantation. Arm 1: prolonged‐release tacrolimus (initial dose 0.2mg/kg/day); Arm 2: prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.15–0.175mg/kg/day) plus basiliximab; Arm 3: prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.2mg/kg/day delayed until Day 5) plus basiliximab. All patients received MMF plus a bolus of corticosteroid (no maintenance steroids). Primary endpoint: eGFR (MDRD4) at Week 24. Secondary endpoints: composite efficacy failure, BCAR and AEs. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Tacrolimus trough levels were readily achieved posttransplant; initially lower in Arm 2 versus 1 with delayed initiation in Arm 3. eGFR (MDRD4) was higher in Arms 2 and 3 versus 1 (p = 0.001, p = 0.047). Kaplan–Meier estimates of composite efficacy failure‐free survival were 72.0%, 77.6%, 73.9% in Arms 1–3. BCAR incidence was significantly lower in Arm 2 versus 1 and 3 (p = 0.016, p = 0.039). AEs were comparable. Prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.15–0.175mg/kg/day) immediately posttransplant plus basiliximab and MMF (without maintenance corticosteroids) was associated with lower tacrolimus exposure, and significantly reduced renal function impairment and BCAR incidence versus prolonged‐release tacrolimus (0.2mg/kg/day) administered immediately posttransplant. Delayed higher‐dose prolonged‐release tacrolimus initiation significantly reduced renal function impairment compared with immediate posttransplant administration, but BCAR incidence was comparable.     

Renal Function at Two Years in Liver Transplant Patients Receiving Everolimus: Results of a Randomized,Multicenter Study

In a 24‐month prospective, randomized, multicenter, open‐label study, de novo liver transplant patients were randomized at 30 days to everolimus (EVR) + Reduced tacrolimus (TAC; n = 245), TAC Control (n = 243) or TAC Elimination (n = 231). Randomization to TAC Elimination was stopped prematurely due to a significantly higher rate of treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection (tBPAR). The incidence of the primary efficacy endpoint, composite efficacy failure rate of tBPAR, graft loss or death postrandomization was similar with EVR + Reduced TAC (10.3%) or TAC Control (12.5%) at month 24 (difference ?2.2%, 97.5% confidence interval [CI] ?8.8%, 4.4%). BPAR was less frequent in the EVR + Reduced TAC group (6.1% vs. 13.3% in TAC Control, p = 0.010). Adjusted change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from randomization to month 24 was superior with EVR + Reduced TAC versus TAC Control: difference 6.7 mL/min/1.73 m² (97.5% CI 1.9, 11.4 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.002). Among patients who remained on treatment, mean (SD) eGFR at month 24 was 77.6 (26.5) mL/min/1.73 m² in the EVR + Reduced TAC group and 66.1 (19.3) mL/min/1.73 m² in the TAC Control group (p < 0.001). Study medication was discontinued due to adverse events in 28.6% of EVR + Reduced TAC and 18.2% of TAC Control patients. Early introduction of everolimus with reduced‐exposure tacrolimus at 1 month after liver transplantation provided a significant and clinically relevant benefit for renal function at 2 years posttransplant.

     

Reduction of Extended‐Release Tacrolimus Dose in Low‐Immunological‐Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients Increases Risk of Rejection and Appearance of Donor‐Specific Antibodies: A Randomized Study

The aim of this study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01744470) was to determine the efficacy and safety of two different doses of extended‐release tacrolimus (TacER) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) between 4 and 12 mo after transplantation. Stable steroid‐free KTRs were randomized (1:1) after 4 mo: Group A had a 50% reduction in TacER dose with a targeted TacER trough level (C₀) >3 μg/L; group B had no change in TacER dose (TacER C₀ 7–12 μg/L). The primary outcome was estimated GFR at 1 year. Of 300 patients, the intent‐to‐treat analysis included 186 patients (group A, n = 87; group B, n = 99). TacER C₀ was lower in group A than in group B at 6 mo (4.1 ± 2.7 vs. 6.7 ± 3.9 μg/L, p < 0.0001) and 12 mo (5.6 ± 2.0 vs. 7.4 ± 2.1 μg/L, p < 0.0001). Estimated GFR was similar in both groups at 12 mo (group A, 56.0 ± 17.5 mL/min per 1.73 m²; group B, 56.0 ± 22.1 mL/min per 1.73 m²). More rejection episodes occurred in group A than group B (11 vs. 3; p = 0.016). At 1 year, subclinical inflammation occurred more frequently in group A than group B (inflammation score [i] >0: 21.4% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.047; tubulitis score [t] >0: 19.6% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.076; i + t: 1.14 ± 1.21 vs. 0.72 ± 1.01, p = 0.038). Anti‐HLA donor‐specific antibodies appeared only in group A (6 vs. 0 patients, p = 0.008). TacER C₀ should be maintained >7 μg/L during the first year after transplantation in low‐immunological‐risk, steroid‐free KTRs receiving a moderate dose of mycophenolic acid.     

Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium can be Safely Administered in Maintenance Renal Transplant Patients: Results of a 1-Year Study

With the objective of enhancing upper gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, myfortic, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) has been developed. This double-blinded, 12-month study investigated whether renal transplant patients taking mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can be safely converted to EC-MPS. Stable kidney transplant patients were randomized to receive EC-MPS (720 mg b.i.d.; n=159) or continue receiving MMF (1000 mg b.i.d.; n=163). The incidence of GI adverse events (AEs) was similar at 3 months (primary endpoint: EC-MPS 26.4%; MMF 20.9%; p=NS) and at 12 months (EC-MPS 29.6%; MMF 24.5%; p=NS). The increase from baseline in mean GI AE severity score, adjusted for duration, tended to be lower in EC-MPS patients (3 months: 0.15 vs. 0.20; 12 months: 0.23 vs. 0.47; p=NS). Neutropenia (<1500 cells/mm3) within the first 3 months (coprimary endpoint) was low in both groups (EC-MPS 0.6%; MMF 3.1%; p=NS). Although the overall incidence of infections was similar, the number of serious infections was significantly lower in EC-MPS patients (8.8% vs. 16.0%; p<0.05). Similar rates of efficacy failure (EC-MPS 2.5%; MMF 6.1%; p=NS), biopsy-proven acute rejection (EC-MPS 1.3%; MMF 3.1%; p=NS) and biopsy-proven chronic rejection (EC-MPS 3.8%; MMF 4.9%; p=NS) were observed in both groups. In conclusion, renal maintenance patients can be converted from MMF to EC-MPS without compromising the safety and efficacy profile associated with MMF.     

Switch to a Sirolimus‐Based Immunosuppression in Long‐Term Renal Transplant Recipients: Reduced Rate of (Pre‐)Malignancies and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in a Prospective,Randomized, Assessor‐Blinded,Controlled Clinical Trial

Renal transplant recipients (RTR) have a 50–200‐fold higher risk for nonmelanoma‐skin cancer (NMSC) causing high rates of morbidity and sometimes mortality. Cohort‐studies gave evidence that a sirolimus‐based immunosuppression may inhibit skin tumor growth. This single‐center, prospective, assessor‐blinded, randomized trial investigated if switching to sirolimus treatment inhibits the progression of premalignancies and moreover how many new NMSC occur compared to continuation of the original immunosuppressive therapy. Forty‐four RTR (mean age 59.9 years, mean duration of immunosuppression 229.5 months) with skin lesions were randomized to sirolimus or continuation of their original immunosuppression. Blinded dermatological assessment at month 6 and 12 by the same dermatologist evaluated the clinical change compared to baseline. Biopsy was performed in suspected malignancy. Already the 6‐month‐assessment showed significant superiority of sirolimus‐therapy: a stop of progression, even regression of preexisting premalignancies (p < 0.0005). This effect was increased at month 12 (p < 0.0001). Nine patients developed histologically confirmed NMSC: one in the sirolimus group, eight in the control group, p = 0.0176. Sirolimus‐based immunosuppression in RTR, even when established many years after transplantation, can delay the development of premalignancies, induce regression of preexisting lesions and decelerate the incidence of new NMSC.     

Randomized Phase 2b Trial of Tofacitinib (CP‐690,550) in De Novo Kidney Transplant Patients: Efficacy,Renal Function and Safety at 1 Year

In this Phase 2b study, 331 low‐to‐moderate risk de novo kidney transplant patients (approximately 60% deceased donors) were randomized to a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of tofacitinib (CP‐690, 550), an oral Janus kinase inhibitor or cyclosporine (CsA). All patients received basiliximab induction, mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids. Primary endpoints were: incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) with a serum creatinine increase of ≥0.3 mg/dL and ≥20% (clinical BPAR) at Month 6 and measured GFR at Month 12. Similar 6‐month incidences of clinical BPAR (11%, 7% and 9%) were observed for MI, LI and CsA. Measured GFRs were higher (p < 0.01) at Month 12 for MI and LI versus CsA (65 mL/min, 65 mL/min vs. 54 mL/min). Fewer (p < 0.05) patients in MI or LI developed chronic allograft nephropathy at Month 12 compared with CsA (25%, 24% vs. 48%). Serious infections developed in 45%, 37% and 25% of patients in MI, LI and CsA, respectively. Anemia, neutropenia and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder occurred more frequently in MI and LI compared with CsA. Tofacitinib was equivalent to CsA in preventing acute rejection, was associated with improved renal function and less chronic allograft histological injury, but had side‐effects at the doses evaluated.     

Late intra‐patient tacrolimus trough level variability as a major problem in kidney transplantation: A Collaborative Transplant Study Report

Intra‐patient variability (IPV) of tacrolimus trough level has been associated with poor outcome after kidney transplantation. These findings were derived from single‐center analyses and restricted mainly to measurements early after transplantation. We analyzed in a multicenter effort whether high IPV of tacrolimus levels at posttransplant years 1, 2, and 3 was associated with impaired clinical outcome. More than 6600 patients who received a deceased donor kidney transplant during 2000‐2014 and had a functioning graft for >3 years were studied. Graft survival was significantly impaired with increasing IPV (P < 0.001). As compared to patients with a low IPV of <30%, the risk of graft loss during years 4‐6 increased 32% in patients with an IPV of 30% to 44% and 66% in patients with an IPV of ≥45% (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001). About one‐third of patients showed an IPV of ≥30% with substantially impaired outcome. Even in patients with good outcome during the first 3 posttransplant years, a high IPV was associated with inferior graft survival. Our data indicate that a fluctuating tacrolimus trough level at years 1, 2, and 3 posttransplant is a major problem in kidney transplantation.