睾丸穿刺活检在卵浆内单精子注射辅助生育中的价值

目的 评价单、双侧睾丸穿刺活检在无精症的病理诊断和卵浆内单精子注射生育中的价值。方法 随机对65例无精症患者进行单侧或双侧活检；测量患者睾丸体积，计算手术时间，评估术后并发症，记录病理结果。结果 65例无精症患者睾丸穿刺病理结果显示：唯支持细胞综合征41例（63％），生精功能低下10例（15．4％），精子成熟阻滞9例（13．8％），正常生精功能5例（7．8％）。双侧睾丸活检术后出现腰腹疼痛10例、恶心8例，单侧睾丸活检仅2例出现腰腹疼痛。双侧睾丸活检中，病理显示生精状态不同者占50％（15／30）。结论 睾丸钳穿活检是一种简单、损伤少的活检方法。单点、单侧睾丸活检可以对无精症进行诊断，但不能反映双侧睾丸的不同生精状态，对欲行卵浆内单精子注射的患者应行双侧睾丸活检，切开获取精子可能是最好的办法。     

附睾、睾丸精子卵浆内单精子注射治疗阻塞性无精症引起不育

为评价附睾或睾丸精子卵浆内单精子注射（ＩＣＳＩ）治疗阻塞性无精症引起不育的疗效，对３１例无精子男性不育患者配偶进行超排卵治疗３７个周期，获卵当日从患者附睾取精，其中２４例获得活动精子，７例失败，改用钳取睾丸曲细精管从中分离精子以供ＩＣＳＩ。结果：共获卵４５３个，附睾、睾丸精子ＩＣＳＩ受精率分别为５５７％、６１７％，平均每周期移植胚胎３７个，总妊娠率每周期２９７％。结论：只要获得活动精子ＩＣＳＩ，阻塞性无精症患者也有机会生育     

Influence of motility and vitality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated and testicular sperm

The vitality of spermatozoa used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a crucial factor for fertilization, establishment and outcome of a pregnancy in assisted reproductive technique cycles. The sperm origin may also be a limiting factor, although little is known about this issue. It is known that the motility of injected spermatozoa and their origin from ejaculate or testicular biopsies are important predictors in terms of fertilization, pregnancy and birth rates. Oocytes of patients in 2593 cycles were retrieved in our in vitro fertilization programme and inseminated via ICSI. We used motile (group 1, n = 2317) or immotile ejaculated spermatozoa (group 2, n = 79), motile sperm retrieved from testicular biopsies (group 3, n = 62) and immotile spermatozoa from testicular biopsies (group 4, n = 135). Female age and number of oocytes retrieved did not differ significantly among the groups. The fertilization rates were as follows: 67.1% in group 1, 49.8% in group 2, 68.3% in group 3 and 47.8% in group 4. The pregnancy rates in cases where three embryos had been transferred amounted to 35.7% in group 1, 17.3% in group 2, 38.3% in group 3 and 20.5% in group 4. The embryo quality showed no differences between groups 1 and 3 (14.5), and between groups 2 (11.8) and 4 (10.8). The abortion rate was similar in groups 1-3, but increased in group 4 (26.6%, 27.3%, 31.6% and 55.5%). Irrespective of their origin, the fertilization potential of injected spermatozoa was found to be influenced by motility. The resulting pregnancy and birth rates, i.e. the potential of the resulting embryos to implant and to achieve viable pregnancies, seem to be additionally dependent on the sperm origin. This was well shown by declining rates when spermatozoa in a relatively early stage of maturity had been used. We see increasing evidence that the degree of sperm maturity has an important impact on the outcome of ICSI. In obstructive azoospermia, spermatozoa retrieved from the epididymis should be used rather than testicular biopsy spermatozoa, or testicular sperm should be preincubated in culture medium before ICSI.     

Ongoing pregnancies resulting from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of spermatozoa from frozen-thawed testicular biopsy specimens

Two clinical pregnancies following intracytoplasmic sperm injection of spermatozoa from frozen-thawed testicular biopsies in two azoospermic men are reported. The use of spermatozoa from cryopreserved testicular tissue is therefore a viable option for azoospermic men, as our results indicate that pregnancies is achievable in these cases.     

Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes between spermatozoa retrieved from testicular biopsy and from ejaculation in cryptozoospermic men

The infrequent presence of spermatozoa in cryptozoospermic men ejaculate is a limiting factor in the treatment of them. Sometimes, this consideration impels us to apply meticulous microscopic search in ejaculate or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) method. The aim of this study was to assess putative effectiveness of sperm origin, ejaculated or testicular, in cryptozoospermia treatment. In this context, were evaluated intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes in two parameters including fertilisation rate (2PN) and embryo quality, independently. We compared the outcome in two groups: patients who underwent ejaculate/ICSI and ones who underwent TESE/ICSI process. Nineteen ICSI cycles performed with testicular spermatozoa and the rest of cycles (n = 208) carried out with ejaculated spermatozoa. Result analysis showed similar fertilisation rate between testicular and ejaculated spermatozoa (respectively, 60% versus 68%, P ≥ 0.05). Also, on the other hand, embryo quality did not show significant differences between two groups, except grade A with low significance. With regard to almost equal performance of both methods in results and being invasive of TESE as surgical sperm retrieval method, the use of ejaculated sperm more than testicular sperm should be recommended in patients with cryptozoospermia whenever possible.     

比较金黄地鼠和人卵浆内单精子注射技术受精率

卵浆内单精子注射技术（ｉｎｔｒａｃｙｔｏｐｌａｓｍｉｃｓｐｅｒｍｉｎｊｅｃｔｉｏｎ，ＩＣＳＩ）１９９２年后已广泛应用于治疗严重的男性不孕患者，平均受精率可达６５％～７０％。但仍有大约１／３的卵在ＩＣＳＩ后未能受精。金黄地鼠ＩＣＳＩ试验（ｈａｍｓｔｅｒ ＩＣＳＩａｓａｙ）可能有助于在临床ＩＣＳＩ治疗前了解精子受精的潜力。为了证明金黄地鼠ＩＣＳＩ和人类ＩＣＳＩ受精率之间的相关性，探索金黄地鼠ＩＣＳＩ能否用为临床ＩＣＳＩ的预试验，本研究采用同一男性不孕患者的精子经显微注射技术在同一天分别注入人和金黄地鼠卵。１６～１８小时后在光镜下观察有无双原核形成（２ ｐｒｏｎｕｃｌｅｕｓ，２ＰＮ）。人卵１１０个其受精率为５８２％（６４／１１０）。金黄地鼠卵１１４个其受精率为１６５％（１４／８０）。经统计学处理，二者无相关性。金黄地鼠ＩＣＳＩ分为两组，Ａ组：无选择地注射了已激活与未激活的卵６３个；Ｂ组：注意选择未激活的卵共５１个。虽经统计学处理无明显差异，但仍可看出Ｂ组的损伤率（１９７±１６６％）低于Ａ组（３５９±５．７％）（Ｐ＝００８）；而Ｂ组的受精率（１８３±１０．９％）略高于Ａ组（１４２±８．７％）（Ｐ＝０?     

Analysis of the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using fresh or frozen sperm

Study Type – Diagnostic (retrospective cohort)
Level of Evidence 2b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? The results of ICSI using fresh or frozen sperm on the site of sperm retrieval remains controversial with respect to outcome. The results of this study showed no difference in outcome using ICSI either with respect to the site of retrieval or whether the sperm used was fresh or frozen. It also showed that the outcome of ICSI is not related to the underlying cause of the azoospermia.

OBJECTIVES

? To compare the outcome of first‐attempt intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) ICSI–embryo transfer (ET) cycles using frozen‐thawed testicular sperm (FTTS), fresh testicular sperm (FTS), frozen‐thawed epididymal sperm (FTES) and fresh epididymal sperm (FES) so as to determine which of these has the most successful ICSI outcome with respect to fertilization rate (FR), pregnancy rate (PR) and birth rate. ? To assess the outcomes according to the underlying aetiology of azoospermia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

? The records of 493 patients undergoing first‐attempt ICSI between 1993 and 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. FTS was used in 112 cycles, FTTS in 43 cycles, FES in 279 cycles, and FTES in 59 cycles. ? Within each group, the aetiology of the azoospermia was recorded according to history, clinical examination and histological analysis (n= 316). ? The FR, clinical PR and delivery rate were calculated for each group with respect to the type of sperm retrieval used.

RESULTS

? Analysis of the data showed no significant differences between any of the four groups in the FR, PR or delivery rate (P > 0.05). ? There were no significant differences seen between fresh sperm (FTS and FES) and frozen sperm (FTTS and FTES) or between epididymal sperm (FES and FTES) and testicular sperm (FTS and FTTS) in any of the outcomes measured (P > 0.05). However, sub‐set analysis showed a statistically higher FR and PR for FTTS over fresh sperm. ? When comparing aetiologies, there was no significant difference in the FR, clinical PR and delivery rate between obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non‐obstructive azoospermia (NOA) groups. However, sub‐set analysis showed a higher PR and birth rate for FTTS over fresh sperm in both OA and NOA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

? The results of the present study suggest that using frozen sperm in ICSI cycles is a reliable and favourable method with the same outcome as fresh sperm. ? Testicular and epididymal sperm have similar ICSI outcomes for both fresh and frozen samples. However, results suggest a tendency for higher PRs and birth rates for frozen than for fresh testicular sperm in both OA and NOA aetiologies. ? The aetiology of azoospermia does not significantly affect the outcome of first‐attempt ICSI. The higher rates in the frozen groups suggest that these patients have had better quality semen when they were initially harvested and frozen.     

睾丸精子获取和单精子卵胞浆内注射术治疗非梗阻性无精子症不育

目的　探讨非梗阻性无精子症患者外科获取睾丸精子的方法和意义。　方法　 4 9例非梗阻性无精子症患者行开放睾丸活检和诊断性睾丸精子获取术 (TESE) ,诊断性TESE有精子者至少 3个月后行单精子卵胞浆内注射 (ICSI)治疗。　结果　 12例 (2 4 .9% )诊断性TESE中发现精子 ,其中 3例为生精减少 ,2例为生精阻滞 ,7例为Sertoli细胞综合征。睾丸体积、血FSH水平和睾丸病理类型不能准确预测是否有精子。 8例行ICSI治疗 ,7例 (87.5 % )再次TESE获得睾丸精子行显微注射 ,3例获得临床妊娠。　结论　非梗阻性无精子症患者有必要行诊断性TESE确定睾丸内是否存在精子 ,获取睾丸精子结合ICSI可以有效治疗非梗阻性无精子症不育。     

Efficiency of percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration as a mode of sperm collection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in nonobstructive azoospermia

PURPOSE: We determined the feasibility of obtaining mature spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) by percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. We also compared the results of ICSI using spermatozoa recovered by open excisional biopsy versus percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 84 men with nonobstructive azoospermia underwent percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration to recover testicular spermatozoa for ICSI on the day of ova retrieval from the wife. Percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration was performed with the patient under general anesthesia in the upper and lower poles of each testis. It was followed by immediate microscopic search of the aspirate to confirm the presence of spermatozoa. In the absence of spermatozoa open excisional biopsy was performed in the same setting. RESULTS: Percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration resulted in the recovery of mature spermatozoa in 45 men (53.6%). Of the remaining 39 men (46.4%) requiring open biopsy adequate spermatozoa were recovered in 28 (71.8%). Although the fertilization rate was significantly higher in the sperm aspiration group, the cleavage and pregnancy rates were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration was a successful initial approach to collect mature spermatozoa in a high proportion of men with nonobstructive azoospermia. It is safe, minimally invasive and well tolerated by all patients.     

Male factors determining the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection with epididymal and testicular spermatozoa

During a period of 8 years, 1,079 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedures with aspirated epididymal or testicular spermatozoa were performed. Epididymal spermatozoa were used in 172 cycles and testicular spermatozoa or spermatids in 907 cycles. Multiple biopsies were obtained from at least two different locations in the testes. Retrieved spermatozoa were used after cryopreservation (frozen) or immediately after aspiration (fresh). Three hundred patients had obstructive azoospermia (OA) or ejaculation failure. In 414 cases, azoospermia was caused by impaired spermatogenesis resulting from maldescended testes, chemotherapy/radiotherapy, or by Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, genetic disorders or unknown aetiology. Transfer rates, pregnancy rates and birth rates per ICSI cycle showed no statistically significant differences between testicular and epididymal spermatozoa in men with OA (28% average birth rates in both cases). However, birth rates differed significantly with regard to the status of spermatogenesis. Treatment of men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) resulted in a birth rate of 19% per cycle. In all patient groups, there was no difference in the birth rates achieved with fresh and cryopreserved spermatozoa. While testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone level and age of the male patient are no statistically significant prognostic factors, the underlying cause of azoospermia is the most important factor determining the outcome of ICSI with epididymal and testicular spermatozoa. The pregnancy rate is lower in NOA patients than in those with OA.     

Comparison of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed with frozen versus fresh testicular sperm

BackgroundIt remains controversial whether there is a difference in the prognosis of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using frozen or fresh testicular sperm in patients with obstructive azoospermia (OA). Moreover, in the available studies, few have tracked neonatal outcomes. This study aimed to compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of ICSI using cryopreserved sperm versus fresh sperm collected by testicular sperm aspiration (TESA).MethodsA total of 317 OA patients treated with ICSI in a university affiliated hospital from January 2016 to December 2020 were included in this study. The participants were divided into two groups according to the type of sperm used for ICSI: frozen sperm group (n=154) and fresh sperm group (n=163). The pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of the two groups were compared.ResultsThe data produced by this study showed no significant statistical difference in the 2 pronuclei (2PN) fertilization rate, 2PN cleavage rate, high-quality blastocyst rate, and the average number of transferred embryos in the frozen and fresh sperm groups. Similarly, no difference was found in implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, premature delivery rate, live birth rate, and gender ratio at birth (P>0.05). The average newborn birth weight was similar in both groups (2,932.61±728.40 vs. 3,100.32±515.64 g, respectively) (P>0.05). A higher incidence of low birthweight (LBW) newborns was found in the frozen sperm group (20.91% vs. 8.49%) (P<0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that LBW is related to single or twin pregnancies (P<0.01), but not sperm (frozen or fresh) (P>0.05). We further analyzed the twin and single pregnancies in the two groups separately, and found that the incidences of LBW were both similar (P>0.05). There was no difference in the Apgar scores at 1 min and 5 min after birth between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe use of frozen testicular sperm by TESA was efficient for men with OA. There were similar pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following TESA-ICSI using frozen or fresh sperm in this retrospective study. Prospective investigations are needed for further validation.     

Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonobstructive azoospermia: testicular histology can predict success of sperm retrieval

PURPOSE: We present treatment results of testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for men with nonobstructive azoospermia and reevaluate the role of testicular histology on open diagnostic testicular biopsy as a predictor of sperm retrieval success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 75 men diagnosed with nonobstructive azoospermia. Cases were categorized into 3 groups of hypospermatogenesis, maturation arrest or Sertoli-cell-only based on the most advanced pattern of spermatogenesis seen on histology. A total of 81 testicular sperm extractions with intracytoplasmic sperm injection were performed for these 75 men. The main outcome measures reviewed included sperm retrieval, fertilization and pregnancy rates with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Sperm retrieval success rates for men in the 3 histological categories were compared. RESULTS: Spermatozoa were successfully retrieved during 47 of 81 (58%) testicular sperm extraction attempts, with subsequent fertilization of 268 of 439 (61%) injected metaphase II oocytes using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Clinical pregnancies were obtained in 26 of 47 (55%) cycles when sperm were retrieved, with ongoing pregnancies or live deliveries for 20 of 47 (43%). Of 39 men with hypospermatogenesis on diagnostic biopsy 31 (79%) had successful sperm retrieval, compared to 9 of 19 (47%) with maturation arrest and 5 of 21 (24%) with a pure Sertolicell-only pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Critical examination of the most advanced pattern of spermatogenesis from open diagnostic testis biopsy allows prediction of sperm retrieval success with testicular sperm extraction. In this study population spermatozoa were retrieved in 58% of attempts. When this testicular sperm was used with intracytoplasmic sperm injection, clinical pregnancy rate was 55% for men with nonobstructive azoospermia.     

Sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes with testicular sperm aspiration in men with severe oligozoospermia and cryptozoospermia

IntroductionSeveral studies addressed the role of testicular sperm aspiration with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in azoospermic men, but few have included non-azoospermic men. The aim of this study was to evaluate testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) sperm retrieval rates and ICSI outcomes in men with severe oligozoospermia.MethodsData were collected retrospectively from 88 consecutive, non-azoospermic, infertile men with idiopathic severe oligozoospermia who underwent TESA between January 2011 and January 2018. Patients were categorized into four groups according to sperm concentration: <5 and >1 million/ml (group 1), <1 and > 0.1 million/ml (group 2), <0.1 million/ml (group 3), and cryptozoospermia (group 4).ResultsMean male age was 37±7 years and the mean female age was 33±4 years. Sperm was recovered successfully in 90% (79/88) of the men overall and in 100% (30/30) of the men in group 1, 97% (29/30) of the men in group 2, 88% (15/17) of the men in group 3, and 45% (5/11) of the men in group 4. Most (65%, 57/88) of the couples had an embryo transfer (ET). The overall clinical pregnancy rate per ET was 46% (26/57). The clinical pregnancy rates (per ET) were 43% (9/21) in group 1, 65% (13/20) in group 2, 36% (4/11) in group 3, and 0% (0/5) in group 4.ConclusionsOur data indicate TESA allows for high sperm retrieval rates and acceptable ICSI pregnancy rates in men with severe oligozoospermia. However, in our experience, TESA sperm retrieval rates and ICSI outcomes are poor in cryptozoospermic men.     

Vasectomy reversal in the age of intracytoplasmic sperm injection

The advent of intracytoplasmic sperm injection has revolutionized the treatment of male infertility and offers an alternative to vasectomy reversal as a treatment option for post-vasectomy infertility. Issues including morbidity, cost and therapeutic outcomes are, however, important considerations for both treatment options. Vasectomy reversal should be considered the ideal option for couples less than 15 years since vasectomy, couples interested in more than one child, couples without in-vitro fertilization insurance coverage and couples with no interest in assisted reproductive techniques. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may be considered as the primary option for those couples with an older female partner especially if bilateral vasoepididymostomy may be required.     

The effects of female age on the outcome of testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile patient with azoospermia

Introduction: Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) is well-defined procedure for surgical sperm retrieval in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. This study was focused on the effectiveness of testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for azoospermic men with different female age subgroups.Materials and methods: A total of 107 men with azoospermia underwent TESE and ICSI treatment. The women were examined in three groups 20–29, 30–34 and 35 years or older. The main outcome in this study was fertilization and pregnancy rates with TESE and ICSI.Results: Spermatozoa were successfully retrieved during 97 of 107 (90.7%) TESE attempts, resulting in the fertilization of 286 of 563 (50.4%) injected metaphase II oocytes. Two hundred and fifty-five of them were transferred (89.8%). The clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer were 22.5% and 20.6% respectively. When comparing the fertilization and pregnancy rates, it was observed that women between the ages of 20–29 years had significantly higher pregnancy rates than women over 34 years of age (p < 0.05).Conclusion: The female age is a major factor in determining successful implantation in ICSI.     

Sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in nonobstructive azoospermic patients with Klinefelter syndrome

Klinefelter syndrome is the most frequent chromosomal abnormality in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. The development of advanced assisted reproductive techniques, such as testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, has provided the possibility of biological fathering in nonobstructive azoospermic patients with Klinefelter syndrome. We aimed to evaluate our sperm retrieval rate by microdissection testicular sperm extraction and to analyse the intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in these patients. Medical records of 110 nonobstructive azoospermic patients with Klinefelter syndrome were retrospectively reviewed. We found that the sperm retrieval rate by microdissection testicular sperm extraction is lower than published reports on other types of secretory azoospermia. The statistical analyses yielded that age, FSH and testosterone levels as predictive factors for successful sperm retrieval.     

Predictive factor for TESE (testicular sperm extraction)--ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) for non-obstructive azoospermia

BACKGROUND: TESE-ICSI has been used very successfully in the treatment of the patients with non-obstructive azoospermia but its indication is still controversial. We performed retrospective study concerning parameters to predict successful recovery of testicular sperm from the patients and outcomes of ICSI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 44 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent TESE-ICSI from July, 1997 to September 1999 were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: 1) Testicular sperm were retrieved from 32 patients (72.7%). ICSI was performed in 29 patients and the partner of 15 patients (46.9%) got pregnant. From 10 patients with histology of Sertoli-cell-only, we could retrieve sperm in 3 patients (30%). 2) Testicular volume, Johnsen's score count (JSC), and FSH were significant parameter to predict the recovery of testicular sperm from the patients, but if we see only the patients with JSC less than 7, there were no significant parameter. Chromosomal abnormality was not a significant parameter. 3) The partner's age, motility of recovered sperm and testicular volume correlated with fertilization rate. Chromosomal abnormality was not significant parameter to predict fertilization. CONCLUSIONS: There was no absolute parameter to predict the recovery of testicular sperm from the patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. All patients with non-obstructive azoospermia can be the indication of TESE-ICSI.     

Microsurgical vasovasostomy versus microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration/testicular extraction of sperm combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A cost-benefit analysis

PURPOSE: Vasovasostomy (VVS) represents the standard therapy of choice for the treatment of obstructive azoospermia following vasectomy. However, recently, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been suggested by some to represent the solution for all cases of malefactor infertility regardless of its etiology based on its success rates. Therefore, we compared VVS to microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA)/testicular extraction of sperm (TESE) and ICSI in terms of pregnancy, complications, and costs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1/93 and 6/98, 157 VVS were performed microsurgically using the double-layer technique. Between 9/94 and 9/97, 69 and 42 couples underwent MESA/ICSI and TESE/ICSI, respectively, for epididymal obstruction and azoospermia of testicular origin. RESULTS: The mean interval of vasal obstruction was 7.6 (0.5-18) years; patency after VVS was 77%, pregnancy rate was 52%. Local complication rate was 4.7%, no major complications were observed. Costs per life birth after VVS were 5,447 DM or 2,793 Euro. Pregnancy rates after MESA/TESE and ICSI were 22.5 and 19.5%, respectively, with 16 singletons, 3 twins and 3 abortions; local complications occurred in 3.9% of the men. Multiple births were noticed in 15.8% following ICSI, but in only 0.7% following VVS. 5.7 and 1.4% of the female partners experienced serious complications (mild or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, respectively). Costs per life birth after a MESA/TESE cycle amounted to 28,804 DM or 14,547 Euro. CONCLUSIONS: Even in the era of ICSI, microsurgical VVS represents the standard approach for obstructive azoospermia following vasectomy. Based on a cost-benefit analysis, VVS is more successful in terms of pregnancy rates (52 vs. 22.5%). VVS does not expose the female partners to complications following treatment of male infertility. In contrast to ICSI, multiple birth rates do not increase after VVS. We conclude that MESA/ICSI should be reversed for patients who are not amenable for microsurgical reconstruction.     

Reproductive outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using testicular sperm and ejaculated sperm in patients with AZFc microdeletions:a systematic review and meta-analysis

Studies have explored the assisted reproductive technology(ART)outcomes of Y-chromosome azoospermia factor c(AZFc)microdeletions,but the effect of sperm source ...