Simultaneous antegrade dual AV node conduction initiates AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (a rare initiation mechanism)

Typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia among adults. The concept of dual pathway physiology remains widely accepted, although this physiology likely results from the functional properties of anisotropic tissue within the triangle of Koch, rather than anatomically distinct tracts of conduction. AVNRT is typically induced with anterograde block over the fast pathway and conduction over the slow pathway, with subsequent retrograde conduction over the fast pathway. On rare occasions, anterograde AV node conduction occurs simultaneously through fast and slow pathways resulting in two ventricular beats in response to one atrial beat. We report a case of AVNRT where the tachycardia is always induced by the same mechanism described above. Successful ablation was achieved by slow pathway modification.     

Pathological Findings Following Slow Pathway Ablation for AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Pathology of Slow Pathway Ablation. Introduction : AV nodal reentrant tachycardia is routinely cured using radiofrequency catheter ablation techniques. However, there remains controversy as to whether the reentrant circuit for this tachycardia exists solely in the AV node or whether perinodal atrial tissues are vital to the circuit. In addition, the effects of radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia on the AV node are not known. We examined an autopsy specimen to determine the anatomical location and extent of AV nodal damage of radiofrequency slow pathway ablation for cure of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.
Methods and Results : A 64-year-old woman with confirmed AV nodal reentrant tachycardia underwent a successful "slow pathway" AV modification with a single radiofrequency application. Five months after the procedure, the patient died from a spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. Postmortem gross pathological examination of the heart was performed. The heart was then sectioned and stained for histologic examination. On gross examination, a pale lesion 0.5 cm in diameter was seen on the endocardial surface adjacent to the tricuspid annulus. approximately 0.85 cm anterior to the coronary sinus os and 1.15 cm from the apex of the triangle of Koch where the AV node resides. Histologic examination revealed a right atrial lesion composed of connective tissue and fat. The compact AV node and surrounding transitional cells were unaffected histologically, with normal atrial cells lying between the AV node and the lesion.
Conclusion : Ablation of the slow pathway to cure AV nodal reentrant tachycardia does not produce any gross or histologic damage to the AV node, suggesting that the AV nodal reentrant circuit does not exist in its entirety in the AV node.     

Architecture of the Atrial Musculature In and Around the Triangle of Koch:

Atrial Fibers. Introduction : Recent studies suggest that atrial fibers in the approaches to the AV node form part of the dual pathways recognized electrophysiologically in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Our aim was to determine, by gross dissection, the arrangement of the superficial musculature in the area of the triangle of Koch In normal hearts and in hearts with documented AVNRT. hoping to ascertain anatomic features that might contribute to the debate.
Methods and Results : We used blunt dissection to study the architecture of the superficial atrial musculature in 16 autopsied hearts from adults who died of noncardiac disease. A well-defined pattern of architecture of muscle fibers was found in the region of the triangle of Koch, showing marked variations in 7 of the 16 specimens. The relationship of these fibers to the histologically specialized AV node was confirmed by histology in three cases. Two hearts from patients with known AVNRT, treated by ablation in one, were examined further histologically. These sections showed that the site of ablation was well distant from the histologically discrete AV node.
Conclusion : The variability in the arrangement of the superficial atrial muscle fibers in the area of the triangle of Koch may be one of the factors influencing the route for impulses entering the AV node. Lesions that ablate nodal reentry are within these atrial fibers rather than the histologically specialized AV node.     

Spontaneous high degree atrioventricular block during AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia.

High-degree atrioventricular (AV) block during AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is considered a rare phenomenon. A patient with slow-fast AVNRT and transient high-degree AV block is presented. Electrophysiological manoeuvres identified the site of block in the lower common pathway of the AV node. This arrhythmia was rendered non-inducible after slow pathway ablation.     

经导管射频消融改良房室结治疗房室结折返性心动过速

报道24例病人经射频消融(RFCA)慢径改良房室结治疗房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)的研究结果。RFCA后24例病人均不再诱发AVNRT(100％),其中23例慢径传导消失(95.8％),1例慢径传导明显减慢(4.2％)。认为RFCA改良慢径对房室和室房传导没有明显影响,其消融成功的可能预测指标为:X线影象消融电极位于房室结后下部、消融电极图A/V<0.4,放电出现交界性早搏或并行性交界性心律。     

Diagnostik und interventionelle Behandlung von AV-Knoten-Reentry-Tachykardien

Atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common form of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. It is characterized by palpitations, dizziness and pulsation at the neck. It is more common in females. AVNRT involves reciprocation between two functionally and anatomically distinct pathways within the perinodal atrial tissue. They extend as a fast pathway superior to Koch’s triangle and as a slow pathway infero-posterior to the compact AV node. Electrocardiography (ECG) during AVNRT shows a regular tachycardia with narrow QRS complexes. Acute treatment involves vagal maneuvers and intravenous adenosine. Catheter ablation targeting the slow pathway is the treatment of choice in symptomatic patients with recurrent episodes of AVNRT. Success rates are as high as almost 100%, whereas the complication rate is low. The only significant complication is a <1% incidence of third-degree AV block. Catheter ablation in AVNRT is performed in almost 25% of all ablation procedures in Germany.     

Distal end of the atrioventricular nodal artery predicts the risk of atrioventricular block during slow pathway catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVE—To search for a reliable anatomical landmark within Koch's triangle to predict the risk of atrioventricular (AV) block during radiofrequency slow pathway catheter ablation of AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
PATIENTS AND METHODS—To test the hypothesis that the distal end of the AV nodal artery represents the anatomical location of the AV node, and thus could be a useful landmark for predicting the risk of AV block, 128 consecutive patients with AVNRT receiving slow pathway catheter ablation were prospectively studied in two phases. In phase I (77 patients), angiographic demonstration of the AV nodal artery and its ending was performed at the end of the ablation procedure, whereas in the subsequent phase II study (51 patients), the angiography was performed immediately before catheter ablation to assess the value of identifying this new landmark in reducing the risk of AV block. Multiple electrophysiologic and anatomical parameters were analysed. The former included the atrial activation sequence between the His bundle recording site (HBE) and the coronary sinus orifice or the catheter ablation site, either during AVNRT or during sinus rhythm. The latter included the spatial distances between the distal end of the AV nodal artery and the HBE and the final catheter ablation site, and the distance between the HBE and the tricuspid border at the coronary sinus orifice floor.
RESULTS—In phase I, nine of the 77 patients had complications of transient (seven patients) or permanent (two patients) complete AV block during stepwise, anatomy guided slow pathway catheter ablation. These nine patients had a wider distance between the HBE and the distal end of the AV nodal artery, and a closer approximation of the catheter ablation site to the distal end of the AV nodal artery, which independently predicted the risk of AV block. In contrast, none of the available electrophysiologic parameters were shown to be reliable. When the distance between the distal end of the AV nodal artery and the ablation target site was more than 2 mm, the complication of AV block virtually never occurred. In phase II, all 51 patients had successful elimination of the slow pathways without complication when the ablation procedure was guided by preceding angiography with identification of the distal end of the AV nodal artery.
CONCLUSIONS—The distal end of the AV nodal artery shown by angiography serves as a useful landmark for the prediction of the risk of AV block during slow pathway catheter ablation of AVNRT.


Keywords: atrioventricular nodal artery; atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia; catheter ablation; heart block.     

Multiple anterograde atrioventricular node pathways in patients with atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

Objectives. This study sought to investigate electrophysiologic characteristics and possible anatomic sites of multiple anterograde slow atrioventricular (AV) node pathways and to compare these findings with those in dual anterograde AV node pathways.Background. Although multiple anterograde AV node pathways have been demonstrated by the presence of multiple discontinuities in the AV node conduction curve, the role of these pathways in the initiation and maintenance of AV node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is still unclear, and possible anatomic sites of these pathways have not been reported.Methods. This study included 500 consecutive patients with AVNRT who underwent electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency ablation. Twenty-six patients (5.2%) with triple or more anterograde AV node pathways were designated as Group I (16 female, 10 male, mean age 48 ± 14 years), and the other 474 patients (including 451 with and 23 without dual anterograde AV node pathways) were designated as Group II (257 female, 217 male; mean age 52 ± 16 years).Results. Of the 21 patients with triple anterograde AV node pathways, AVNRT was initiated through the first slow pathway only in 3, through the second slow pathway only in 8 and through the two slow pathways in 9. Of the five patients with quadruple anterograde AV node pathways, AVNRT was initiated through all three anterograde slow pathways in three and through the two slower pathways (the second and third slow pathways) in two. After radiofrequency catheter ablation, no patient had inducible AVNRT. Eleven patients (42.3%) in Group I had multiple anterograde slow pathways eliminated simulataneously at a single ablation site. Eight patients (30.7%) had these slow pathways eliminated at different ablation sites; the slow pathways with a longer conduction time were ablated more posteriorly in the Koch's triangle than those with a shorter conduction time. The remaining seven patients (27%) had a residual slow pathway after delivery of radiofrequency energy at a single or different ablation sites. The patients in Group I had a longer tachycardia cycle length, poorer retrograde conduction properties and a higher incidence of multiple types of AVNRT than those in Group II.Conclusions. Multiple anterograde AV node pathways are not rare in patients with AVNRT. However, not all of the anterograde slow pathways were involved in the initiation and maintenance of tachycardia. Radiofrequency catheter ablation was safe and effective in eliminating critical slow pathways to cure AVNRT.     

Electrophysiologic Spectrum of Atrioventricular Nodal Behavior in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Undergoing Selective Fast or Slow Pathway Ablation

AV Nodal Behavior After Ablation. Introduction; The objective of this report is to delineate the atrioventricular (AV) nodal electrophysiologic behavior in patients undergoing fast or slow pathway ablation for control of their AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).
Methods and Results: One hundred sixteen consecutive patients with symptomatic AVNRT were included. Twenty-two patients underwent fast pathway ablation with complete abolition of AVNRT in all and development of complete AV block in five patients. Of 17 patients with intact AV conduction postablation, 12 had demonstrated antegrade dual pathway physiology during baseline study, which was maintained in three and lost in nine patients postablation. Two patients with successful fast pathway ablation developed uncommon AVNRT necessitating a slow pathway ablation. Twenty-one patients demonstrated both common and uncommon forms of AV nodal reentry during baseline study. The earliest site of atrial activation was close to the His-bundle recording site (anterior interatrial septum) during common variety and the coronary sinus ostium (posterior interatrial septum) during the uncommon AV nodal reentry in all 21 patients. Ninety-six patients underwent successful slow pathway ablation. Among these, the antegrade dual pathway physiology demonstrable during baseline study (60 patients) was maintained in 25 and lost in 35 patients postablation.
Conclusion: These data suggest that: (1) dual pathway physiology may persist after successful ablation, which might be a reflection of multiple reentrant pathways in patients with AVNRT: and (2) the retrograde pathways during common and uncommon AVNRT have anatomically separate atrial breakthroughs. These findings have important electrophysiologic implications regarding the prevailing concept of the AV nodal physiology in patients with AVNRT.     

Need for Fast Pathway Ablation in Typical Irregular AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in a Patient with Multiple AV Nodal Pathways

A case of a 60-year-old male with irregular AV nodal reentrant tachycardia of the common type is reported. Electrophysiological study revealed multiple antegrade slowly conducting AV nodal pathways and one exclusively retrogradely conducting fast AV nodal pathway. Despite the recommendation for slow pathway ablation as the treatment of choice in patients with AVNRT, first pathway ablation was successfully performed in this case due to the risk of total A V block of ablating the slow pathways. The present report shows that there is the rare patient in whom fast pathway ablation is required for curative treatment of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Conduction properties of the antegrade fast and slow AV nodal pathways associated with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.

To elucidate differences in conduction properties among the normal atrioventricular (AV) node and the antegrade fast and slow dual AV nodal pathways (DAVNPW), AV nodal conduction curves were analyzed quantitatively in 38 patients. Eighteen patients had antegrade DAVNPW with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (dual pathways group) and the remaining 20 had smooth AV nodal conduction curves, without evidence of AV nodal dysfunction (control group). The effective refractory period (ERP) of the antegrade fast pathway was longer than that of the normal AV node (at both basic cycle lengths of 700 and 500 msec, p less than 0.01). Although the atrial premature beats were delayed by a longer ERP in the fast pathway, there was no significant difference in the degree of prolongation of AV nodal conduction time related to shortening of the coupling interval (i.e., ratio of A2H2 increment to A1A2 decrement) between these two pathways. On the other hand, the ERP of the antegrade slow pathway was similar to that of the normal AV node. The degree of prolongation of AV nodal conduction time (relative to the shortening of the coupling interval) was greater in the antegrade slow pathway than in the normal AV node. In conclusion, these findings suggest that in DAVNPW with AVNRT: (1) the antegrade fast pathway is similar to the AV node and its conduction properties are unlikely to be better than those of the normal AV node and (2) the antegrade slow pathway has quantitatively poorer conduction properties than the normal AV node, since it has a greater degree of decremental conduction.     

射频能量测试交界性心律消融房室结折返性心动过速

探讨能量测试法在房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT)慢径标测与消融中的作用。将 90例AVNRT患者分成三组 (每组 30例 ) ,分别采用能量测试法、下位法和后位法进行慢径标测与射频消融。能量测试法是在Koch三角区逐步以小剂量多次试验放电标测 ,以出现加速性交界性心律为慢径传导部位 ;从 2 0W开始消融并增至 30W ,持续 12 0s ,以出现加速性交界性心律且逐渐转变为窦性心律为消融有效。能量测试法所需手术标测时间、X线曝光时间和消融能量明显少于后位法 (12 1± 43vs 183± 6 7min ,5 8± 2 1vs 93± 34min ,70 0 0± 470vs 12 0 0 0± 75 0J,P≤ 0 .0 5 ) ,而发生短暂性房室阻滞和交界性心动过速则均较下位法明显减少。慢径消融有效时几乎 10 0 %出现加速性交界性心律 ;慢径传导呈多部位分布。结论 :能量测试法运用于AVNRT慢径标测及消融中 ,能较敏感地揭示慢径传导部位和消融有效的靶点 ,为AVNRT慢径标测消融的有效方法。     

Percutaneous catheter modification of the atrioventricular node. A potential cure for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Our purpose was to describe a technique of atrioventricular (AV) node modification for patients with drug refractory AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Nine patients (mean age, 45 +/- 20; range, 14-82) with recurrent drug refractory AVNRT (n = 8) or sudden cardiac death thought to be precipitated by AVNRT (n = 1) underwent a percutaneous catheter procedure to modify AV nodal function. The area between the electrode recording the maximal His-bundle electrogram and the ostium of the coronary sinus was divided into three zones. Perinodal direct current shocks of 100-300 J were delivered to one (n = 2), two (n = 3), or three (n = 4) zones without complications. The procedure endpoints were modification of AV conduction (either first degree AV block or complete retrograde ventriculo-atrial [VA] block) and failure to induce AVNRT before or after isoproterenol and/or atropine administration. Six of nine patients (67%) have had no inducible or spontaneous AVNRT over a mean follow-up of 12.3 +/- 4.1 months (range, 4.5-17). One of the six underwent repeat, successful modification, because AVNRT was inducible at restudy 2 days after the initial procedure. AVNRT recurred in three patients (33%), one early (3 days) and two late (3-4 months). Two of these patients underwent complete ablation of the AV junction and permanent pacemaker placement, whereas one is controlled with drug therapy. Therefore, AV nodal modification resulted in tachycardia control without antiarrhythmic drugs in six of nine (67%) and obviated the need for complete AV junctional ablation in seven of nine patients (78%). Elimination of AVNRT appears to result from either block in the retrograde fast pathway or modification of the antegrade slow pathway, such that AVNRT cannot be sustained. Additional findings suggest that an atrio-Hisian accessory connection may not be involved in AVNRT in some of these patients. Percutaneous catheter AV nodal modification appears to be a promising technique for treatment of refractory AVNRT and may obviate need for complete AV junctional ablation in a substantial number of patients with drug/pacemaker refractory AVNRT.     

Koch三角下位与中位线性消融对治疗常规消融方法困难的房室结折返性心动过速的比较

目的: 比较常规消融方法困难的房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)Koch三角下位与中位线性消融两种方法的有效性和安全性。方法: 回顾性分析比较常规消融方法困难的房室结折返性心动过速Koch三角下位线性消融（三尖瓣环至冠状窦口中部）和中位线性消融（三尖瓣环至希氏束与冠状窦口连线的中下1/3交界水平）的手术成功率、慢径消除率、放电时间和操作时间。结果: 下位和中位线性消融均具有较高的成功率（94.4%、100%）。在放电时间上,下位法消融组显著高于中位法线性消融［（578±177）ms vs ( 481±185)ms,P<0.01］,而整个手术操作时间,下位法组要明显低于中位法［（153±51）ms vs (199±56)ms,P<0.01）］。在消融过程中,中位法出现1例一过性Ⅰ度房室传导阻滞,两组无任何程度的持续房室传导阻滞发生。结论: 对常规方法消融后复发的AVNRT,Koch三角下位线性消融与中位线性消融方法均较为安全,但下位法可能操作更简洁。     

Long-term outcome of AV node modulation in 387 consecutive patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia

Aim of this study was to assess the long-term results of AV-node modulation in patients with AV nodal reetrant tachycardia. METHODS: From December 1991 until September 1999, AV node modulation (ablation of the fast pathway or ablation/modification of the slow pathway) was performed in 387 consecutive patients with clinically apparent AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Follow-up data was available in 95% of patients with a mean of 41 +/- 26 months after ablation. RESULTS: Acute success rate was 97%. During long-term follow-up recurrence rate was 7.4% without any difference between fast and slow pathway ablation. Recurrence occurred in 23% of patients with persistent dual AV node physiology after ablation (modification of the slow pathway) in contrast to 3% without dual AV node physiology (ablation of the slow pathway) (p = 0.002). The presence of a dual AV node physiology after slow pathway modulation was the only predictor of recurrence during long-term follow-up. The complication rate was 5.7%. The incidence of complete heart block was 1% without any difference between fast and slow pathway ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter modulation of the AV node for the treatment of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia is effective and safe. During long-term follow-up, the recurrence rate was low. Modulation of the slow pathway is associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate than ablation of the slow pathway.     

Multiple AV nodal pathways in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia--more common than expected?

AIMS: It was the purpose of this study to determine the incidence of more than two AV nodal pathways in patients with AVNRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 78 consecutive patients with AV-nodal reentrant tachycardias (AVNRT) (50 females, 28 males, mean age 52.8 +/- 14.6 years), the number of sudden AH increases by 50 ms or more (AH-jump) was analysed during atrial extrastimulation. The incidence of two AV nodal pathways was accepted to be present in patients with AVNRT without an AH-jump ('smooth curve'). The following forms of tachycardia were induced: a typical AVNRT (slow-fast) in 67 patients, an atypical AVNRT (fast-slow) in 12 patients and a slow-slow-AVNRT in 4 patients. Five patients had two forms of AVNRT. 47 patients (60.3%) showed two AV nodal pathways, 27 patients (34.6%) had three AV-nodal pathways and 4 patients (5.1%) exhibited four AV-nodal pathways. For successful catheter ablation of AVNRT in patients with more than two pathways, more radiofrequency energy applications were required (9.2 +/- 6.3) compared with patients with only two pathways (6.7 +/- 4.8). Furthermore, in patients with more than two AV-nodal pathways, the catheter intervention resulted more frequently in a modulation of slow pathway conduction than in an ablation of the slow pathway(s). CONCLUSION: The incidence of more than two AV-nodal pathways in patients with AVNRT was unexpectedly high at about 40%. Thus, these tachycardias require a meticulous electrophysiological evaluation for successful ablation.     

Junctional rhythm occurring during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation,is it different among Egyptians?

IntroductionRadio frequency ablation of the slow pathway has become first-line therapy for the elimination of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Slow pathway ablation is guided by a combination of fluoroscopic landmarks, electrogram morphology, and the induction of accelerated junctional rhythm (JR) during the application of radiofrequency energy. Although JR occurs usually during slow pathway ablation of AVNRT, the pattern of JR has not been adequately studied.¹³Aim of the studyTo investigate in detail the characteristics of junctional rhythm occurring during radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia AVNRT among Egyptians.MethodsThis study included 30 patients who underwent electrophysiological study for narrow complex supraventricular regular tachycardia which revealed to be AVNRT.ResultsThirty (100%) patients showed induction of junctional rhythm at the successful ablation sites. JR was a very sensitive predictor of successful ablation but not so specific with specificity of 60%. Sex patterns of JR were observed. The most common pattern of JR was sinus–junctional–junctional (SJJ) while sinus–junctional-block (SJB) was the least. The most specific pattern for effective ablation was junctional–junctional–junctional (JJJ), while intermittent burst was the least. P value is 0.001 i.e. highly significant.ConclusionJunctional rhythm is a sensitive predictor of successful ablation. The pattern of JR is a useful predictor of successful ablation. Egyptian population has distinctive patterns of JR during AVNRT ablation.     

Slow:Fast and Slow:Slow AV Nodal Reentry in the Rabbit Resulting From Longitudinal Dissociation Within the Posterior AV Nodal Input

Objective: The anatomic and electrophysiologic bases for multiple forms of sustained AV nodal tachycardia were determined in the rabbit. Methods: Intracellular microelectrode recordings were used to identify antegrade and retrograde conduction limbs of sustained tachycardias observed in 23 of 152 superfused rabbit AV junctions. Results: Slow:slow tachycardias (196 ± 12 msec cycle length) with nearly equal AH and HA intervals (99 ± 12; 97 ± 11 msec, respectively) and early atrial activation near the coronary sinus os were observed in 14 preparations and slow:fast tachycardias (189 ± 11 msec cycle length) with an AH > HA interval (141 ± 12; 48 ± 10 msec, respectively) and early atrial activation along the anterior limbus of the fossa ovalis were observed in 11 preparations. Both tachycardias were associated with longitudinal dissociation and localized reentry within the triangle of Koch. Slow:fast and slow:slow tachycardias exhibited counterclockwise and clockwise reentry circuits, respectively. Both circuits were present in two preparations. Slow:fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardias could be reset with stimuli introduced near the coronary sinus os and the anterior AV nodal input. Slow:slow tachycardias could be reset only by stimuli introduced near the coronary sinus os. The fraction of the tachycardia cycle length contained within the compact AV node was greater for slow:fast (0.35 ± 0.07) than slow:slow reentry (0.15 ± 0.05, p = 0.026), suggesting a longer lower common pathway for slow:fast tachycardia. Conclusions: Longitudinal dissociation within the posterior AV nodal input incorporating the AV node can provide the reentrant substrate for two different clinical forms of sustained AV nodal tachycardias.     

Pace mapping of Koch's triangle reduces risk of atrioventricular block during ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

INTRODUCTION: Slow pathway (SP) ablation of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can be complicated by second- to third-degree AV block. We assessed the usefulness of pace mapping of Koch's triangle in preventing this complication. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nine hundred nine consecutive patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of AVNRT were analyzed. Group 1 (n=487) underwent conventional slow pathway ablation. Group 2 (n=422) underwent ablation guided by pace mapping of Koch's triangle, which located the anterogradely conducting fast pathway (AFP) based on the shortest St-H interval obtained by stimulating the anteroseptal, midseptal, and posteroseptal aspects of Koch's triangle. In group 2, AFP was anteroseptal in 384 (91%), midseptal in 33 (7.8%), and posteroseptal or absent in 5 (1.2%). In 32 of 33 patients with midseptal AFP, slow pathway ablation was performed strictly in the posteroseptal area. In 4 of 5 patients with posteroseptal or no AFP, retrograde fast pathway was ablated. Two patients refused ablation. Persistent second- to third-degree AV block was induced in 7 (1.4%) of 487 group 1 patients versus 0 (0%) of 422 group 2 patients (P=0.038). Ablation was successful in all patients in whom ablation was performed. CONCLUSION: Pace mapping of Koch's triangle identifies patients in whom the AFP is absent or is abnormally close to the slow pathway. In these cases, guiding ablation helps to avoid AV block.     

Selected Slow Pathway Ablation in a Patient with Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries and Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

AVNRT in Corrected TGA. We report the first known case of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) associated with a corrected transposition of the great arteries to be treated successfully by ablation of the slow pathway. Triple AV nodal pathways were observed in the anterograde direction and two types of AVNRT were induced. Input of the fast pathway to the AV node was located at the anterior portion of the left-sided A V annulus, while the input of the intermediate and slow pathways was located at the anteroseptal portion of the right-sided AV annulus. Radiofrequency energy ablation at the right anteroseptal site eliminated the intermediate and slow pathways.