Risk of pregnancy-related venous thrombosis in carriers of severe inherited thrombophilia

Homozygous carriers of factor V Leiden have an approximately 80-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis. Also double heterozygous carriers of both the factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene mutations are at high thrombotic risk. The magnitude of the risk of venous thrombosis in pregnant women with the two severe thrombophilic conditions has not been estimated so far. We performed a multicenter retrospective family study in women with homozygous factor V Leiden, double heterozygous factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene mutation, and women with normal coagulation. Only relatives of index patients with thrombosis formed the study cohort. Fifteen homozygous and 39 double heterozygous women were compared to 182 women with normal coagulation. Venous thrombosis occurred in 3 of 19, 2 of 50 and 1 of 221 pregnancies, respectively. One thrombotic episode occurred in the third trimester, the remaining 5 in the postpartum. The prevalence of venous thrombosis was 15.8% (95% CI 3.4-39.6) for homozygotes. 4.0% (95% CI 0.5-13.7) for double heterozygotes and 0.5% for women with normal coagulation. The relative risk of pregnancy-related venous thrombosis was 41.3 (95% CI 4.1-419.7) for homozygous and 9.2 (95% CI 0.8-103.2) for double heterozygous carriers. In conclusion, homozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and, to a lesser extent, double heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and of the prothrombin mutation have an increased risk of venous thrombosis during pregnancy, particularly high during the postpartum period. On the basis of these findings we recommend that these women receive anticoagulant prophylaxis at least in the postpartum, that should perhaps be extended to the whole pregnancy in homozygous carriers.     

Effect of hemostatic risk factors on the individual probability of thrombosis during pregnancy and the puerperium

In a retrospective study of 190 women with a first history of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium and 190 age-matched women with at least one prior pregnancy and no history of venous thromboembolism, the individual probability of thrombosis was determined. Assuming an overall risk of 1 in 1500 pregnancies, the probability of pregnancy-related thrombosis in carriers of homozygous factor V Leiden was 1 in 80 (odds ratio 20.6, p=0.005) and among carriers of combined heterozygous factor V Leiden and heterozygous G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene 1 in 20 (odds ratio 88, p<0.001). The probability of thrombosis per pregnancy among women with elevated levels of factor VIII:C (>172 % activity) was 1 in 385 (odds ratio 4.5, p<0.001) and among those with increased levels of von Willebrand factor antigen (>190 %) 1 in 435 (odds ratio 4.0, p=0.002), independent of elevated factor VIII:C levels. The high prevalence of combined and homozygous defects of hemostatic components (21.6%) in patients as compared with normal women (0.86%) supports the concept that venous thromboembolism is a multicausal disorder.     

Cerebral venous thrombosis: Incidence in prothrombotic states

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare clotting event with a highly variable clinical presentation. Local and systemic infections, collagen vascular disorders, malignancies, pregnancy and puerperium, and the use of oral contraceptives (OC) have been strongly associated with CVT. It is clear that a minority of individuals with the above conditions develop CVT. Therefore, inherited or acquired prothrombotic states may play a key role in the development of this disease.In recent years, the discovery of new thrombophilic risk factors such as factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene mutation has contributed to the understanding of the environment-gene interaction in the development of thrombosis. Several studies have found factor V Leiden to be the most common coagulation abnormality in patients with CVT, with a prevalence of 20% to 25%. Immobilization, puerperium, or the use of oral contraceptives, factors considered to increase the risk of developing thromboses, were present in the majority of the cases.The odds ratio for CVT in women heterozygous for the prothrombin gene mutation taking OC was 150, with an odds ratio of 10 for carriers of the mutation and 22 for OC users, respectively. Hence, the inherited or acquired hypercoagulable states establish the conditions for thrombosis to develop when certain factors are present. Numerous cases of factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutation in patients with CVT during pregnancy and puerperium have been reported, and the prevalence of prothrombotic risk factors appears to be similar to the ones in patients with extracerebral thrombosis during the same period.CVT in neonates and young infants is a rare, but well-recognized disorder with a high morbidity rate. The prevalence of congenital and inherited prothrombotic risk factors in children with CVT is comparable or even higher than in the adult population.Although advances have been made in the characterization of prothrombotic risk factors in patients with CVT, many cases still are considered idiopathic. Larger, well-designed, prospective studies will allow practitioners to determine the population at risk for CVT. Therefore, adequate measures can be taken in order to prevent this severe thrombotic disorder.     

Factor V Leiden mutation and pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism: what is the exact risk? Results from a meta-analysis

The magnitude of the association of factor V Leiden mutation with pregnancy-related venous thrombosis remains unclear. Our objective was to undertake a systematic review and a metaanalysis of the literature to estimate precisely the association of factorV Leiden mutation with the risk of first, or recurrent, pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism. Studies published before October 2005 were identified by Medline((R)). Using both fixed and random effect models, odds ratios (OR) with accompanying 95% confidential intervals (CI) were calculated for the factor V Leiden mutation and the clinical end-point (Yusuf-Peto adaptation of the Mantel-Haenszel, DerSimonian and Laird method). We identified 13 studies including 7 cohorts and 6 casecontrol studies relating to factor V Leiden and pregnancy-related venous thrombosis. The results from the cohorts showed a pooled OR of 4.46 (95% CI, 1.82-10.94; 7,879 pooled women), with no evidence of statistical heterogeneity (p = 0.36), for the risk of a first venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or the postpartum period associated with the factor V Leiden mutation. Case-control studies revealed a higher risk (OR 8.6, 95% CI, 5.85-12.63; 1,433 [corrected] pooled women) with significant heterogeneity (p < 0.005). Because of insufficient data, an analysis for the risk of recurrence could not be performed. Our findings emphasize the fact that limited data are available on this topic. This meta-analysis provides clinicians with an estimate of the average risk of a first thrombosis occurring during pregnancy in women carrying the factor V Leiden to assist the management of such women.     

Effect of prothrombin 19911 A>G polymorphism on the risk of cerebral sinus‐venous thrombosis

Background and Purpose: The A>G polymorphism at position 19911 of the prothrombin gene is associated with a mildly increased risk of venous thromboembolism, alone or in association with such common thrombophilia mutations as factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210 GA. Its role in cerebral sinus‐venous thrombosis (CSVT) is not known. Methods: The presence of prothrombin 19911 A>G was investigated in a case–control study of 107 patients with cerebral thrombosis and factor V Leiden (n = 25), prothrombin 20210 GA (n = 47), without known thrombophilia (n = 35) and 842 healthy individuals with the corresponding coagulation profile. Results: Prothrombin 19911 A>G did not increase the risk of CSVT in carriers of factor V Leiden (adjusted odds ratio 1.6, 95%CI 0.6–4.7), prothrombin 20210 GA (odds ratio 1.1, 95%CI 0.6–2.2), nor in patients without known thrombophilia (odds ratio 1.3, 95%CI 0.5–3.1). Conclusions: Prothrombin 19911 A>G polymorphism does not appear to be a risk factor for CSVT, alone or in association with factor V Leiden or prothrombin 20210GA.     

The risk of fetal loss in family members of probands with factor V Leiden mutation.

In order to investigate the risk of fetal loss in carriers of factor V Leiden who are family members of probands with this mutation, we performed a retrospective cohort study including 109 women who had been pregnant at least once and were family members of 61 probands with venous thromboembolism and a single identified factor V Leiden mutation. The rate of pregnancies ending in unexplained fetal loss, early miscarriage, late miscarriage or stillbirth in women with the factor V Leiden was compared with that of women with normal genotype. In the 65 women who were carriers of factor V Leiden 31 of the 191 pregnancies (16.2% per pregnancy) resulted in unexplained fetal loss, as compared to 13 of the 121 pregnancies (10.7% per pregnancy) in the 44 non-carriers (relative risk, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.8-3.2). After the first trimester of pregnancy, 25 pregnancies (13.1% per pregnancy) among carriers of factor V Leiden ended in fetal loss, as compared to 7 (5.8% per pregnancy) among females with normal genotype (relative risk, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.01 to 5.1). We conclude that carriers of factor V Leiden who are family members of probands with this mutation have a statistically significant and clinically important risk of late miscarriage or stillbirth. Studies addressing the benefit-to-risk ratio of adopting routinary thromboprophylactic measures following the first trimester of pregnancy in these women are strongly indicated.     

Interrelation of hyperhomocysteinemia and inherited risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Results from the E.D.I.TH. study: a hospital-based case-control study

BACKGROUND: Moderate hyperhomocysteinemia and factor V Leiden mutation are among the most prevalent risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The hypothesis of an interaction between those risks has been raised and conflicting results were reported. METHODS: We designed a hospital-based case-control study to test the interaction between Factor V Leiden and fasting serum total homocysteine (tHcy). We have also analysed the G20210A prothrombin gene variant. This study enrolled 904 hospitalised patients who had an objectively proven deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism as well as 904 hospitalised control patients matched for gender, age and major acquired risk factor for VTE. RESULTS: Our data did not detect any multiplicative interaction between hyperhomocysteinemia (>15 mumol/L) and factor V Leiden mutation or G20210A prothrombin gene variant. Odds ratios (95% CI) were 4.0 (1.5-11) and 6.0 (1.3-27) for the combined effect of hyperhomocysteinemia with either factor V Leiden mutation or G20210A prothrombin gene variant, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Current data provide further knowledge in relationship between hyperhomocysteinemia and inherited risk factors, such as factor V Leiden mutation and G20210A prothrombin gene variant. As those risk factors are not so rare among Caucasians, a better estimate of the risk related to double exposure might help to optimise venous thromboembolism prevention.     

Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy is not associated with persistent elevated activated protein C (APC) sensitivity ratio based on the endogenous thrombin potential

Women who are using oral contraceptives can acquire APC resistance, measured by the effect of APC on the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). The objective of our study was to examine whether persistentAPC resistance determined with an ETP-based normalized APC sensitivity ratio (nAPCsr) is a risk marker for venous thromboembolism in women with pregnancy-associated thromboembolism. We determined the activities of antithrombin, protein C, protein S, and performed a genetic analysis of factor V Leiden G1691A, prothrombin mutation G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation (MTHFR C677T) in 65 women with venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or the puerperium and in 114 normal women. A significantly (p<0.05) higher nAPCsr was present in normal women using hormones, in younger women (相似文献   

In families with inherited thrombophilia the risk of venous thromboembolism is dependent on the clinical phenotype of the proband

The utility of laboratory investigation of relatives of individuals with inherited thrombophilia is uncertain. To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among the carriers, we investigated a family cohort of 1,720 relatives of probands with thrombophilia who were evaluated because of VTE (n=1,088), premature arterial thrombosis (n=113), obstetric complication (n=257), or universal screening before pregnancy or hormonal contraception or therapy (n=262); 968 relatives were carriers of thrombophilia. A first deep venous thrombosis (DVT) occurred in 44 carriers and 10 non-carriers during 37,688 and 29,548 observation-years from birth, respectively. The risk of DVT among the carriers compared with non-carriers was estimated as a hazard ratio (HR). If the proband had VTE and factor V Leiden (FVL) and/or prothrombin (PT)20210A, the HR for DVT was 2.77 (95%CI 1.21-4.82) in the carriers overall, and 5.54 (95%CI 3.20-187.00) in those homozygous or double heterozygous for FVL and PT20210A. If the proband had VTE and a deficiency of antithrombin (AT), protein C or S, the HR for DVT was 5.14 (95%CI 0.88-10.03) in the carriers overall, and 12.86 (95%CI 2.46-59.90) in those with AT deficiency. No increase in risk was found among the carriers who were relatives of the probands who were evaluated for reasons other than VTE. In conclusion, familial investigation for inherited thrombophilia seems justified for probands with previous VTE, but appears of doubtful utility for the relatives of probands without VTE. This should be taken with caution regarding families with deficiency of natural anticoagulants, given the low number of cases analysed.     

Obstetric complications and pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism: the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin on their prevention in carriers of factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutation

Whether the administration of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) during pregnancy is effective in preventing obstetric complications and pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women who are carriers of factor V Leiden (FVL) and/or prothrombin variant G20210A (PTm) is controversial. This observational study investigated the possible efficacy of pharmacological treatment with LMWH ± aspirin (ASA) in pregnancy outcomes in 1,011 pregnancies of 416 women with thrombophilia (FVL and/or PTm). Most patients were chosen on the basis of previous obstetrical complications (36%), or because of familial or personal history of venous/arterial thromboembolism (28% and 18%, respectively); 74 patients (18%) were incidentally identified. The outcome was evaluated according to the type of treatment and of the period of pregnancy when the treatment was started. After adjustment for observation before and after diagnosis of thrombophilia, previous miscarriages and VTE, parity, age and centre, we observed that LMWH had a protective effect on miscarriages (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.94) and VTE (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.21). ASA appeared to have no effect on the prevention of obstetric complications and VTE. A nested analysis performed in 116 women with two or more obstetric complications confirmed that the highest number of live births was recorded in the group under LMWH prophylaxis (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.75). These results suggest that LMWH prophylaxis reduces the risk of obstetric complications in carriers of FVL and/or PTm, particularly in those with previous obstetric events. Furthermore, LMWH prophylaxis reduces the risk of pregnancy-related VTE.     

Is the prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation in patients with pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis really different?

INTRODUCTION: Previous investigations have suggested a lower prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation in patients with pulmonary embolism, as compared to patients with deep leg vein thrombosis. METHODS: We studied unselected patients with pulmonary embolism, in whom we also assessed the presence of deep vein thrombosis by ultrasonography. We assessed the prevalence of heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden mutation and compared the outcome of patients with a normal ultrasound (primary pulmonary embolism) to those with an abnormal ultrasound (combined form of venous thromboembolism). Furthermore, we performed a literature search to identify all articles regarding the prevalence of heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation in patients with primary deep vein thrombosis, primary pulmonary embolism and a combined form of venous thromboembolism. We calculated a (common) odds ratio for these 3 manifestations of venous thromboembolism, including the current findings. RESULTS: In 92 patients with proven pulmonary embolism, 25 (27%) had also an abnormal ultrasound. In these patients, the prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation was 24% (95% CI 9%-45%), whereas the mutation was present in 5 of 67 patients with primary pulmonary embolism (7%; 95% CI 2%-16%). The literature analysis indicated the common odds ratio for the presence of heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation in patients with primary deep vein thrombosis, primary pulmonary embolism and the combined form of venous thromboembolism to be 7.9 (95% CI 5-12), 3.5 (95% CI 2-6) and 6.8 (95% CI 3-14), respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with primary pulmonary embolism the prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation appears to be half of that reported in patients with primary deep vein thrombosis. The mechanism remains unclear.     

The risk of early recurrent venous thromboembolism after oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with the G20210A transition in the prothrombin gene.

A G20210A transition in the prothrombin gene is a common risk factor of venous thrombosis. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers of the 20210A allele is unknown and guidelines for secondary thromboprophylaxis in these patients are not available. In a prospective multicenter trial, 492 patients with a history of objectively documented venous thromboembolism were followed for a mean observation time of 24+/-16 months after discontinuation of oral anticoagulants. Forty-two patients (8.5%) were carriers of the 20210A allele. Three of the 42 patients with the G20210A mutation (7%) and 54 of 450 patients without the mutation (12%) experienced recurrent venous thrombosis. At 24 months, the probability of recurrence was 8% (95% CI 0-16.7) in patients with the mutation and was 12.2% (95% CI 8.8-15.6) in patients without the mutation. In conclusion, the risk of early recurrent venous thromboembolism is not higher in patients with the G20210A mutation than in those without the mutation. Therefore, long-term secondary thromboprophylaxis with oral anticoagulants in heterozygous carriers of the 20210A allele is not justified.     

Combined effect of factor V Leiden and prothrombin 20210A on the risk of venous thromboembolism--pooled analysis of 8 case-control studies including 2310 cases and 3204 controls. Study Group for Pooled-Analysis in Venous Thromboembolism

Factor V Leiden and factor II G20210A mutations are two frequent genetic risk factors involved in venous thromboembolism (VTE). The goal of this pooled analysis of 8 case-control studies, comprising a total of 2310 cases and 3204 controls, was to precisely estimate the risk of VTE in patients bearing both mutations (double heterozygotes). Odds ratios for VTE were 4.9 (95% CI; 4.1-5.9) for the factor V Leiden and 3.8 (3.0-4.9) for the factor II G20210A mutation. Fifty-one cases (2.2%) and none of the controls were double heterozygotes. The odds ratio for venous thrombosis in double heterozygotes was 20.0 (11.1-36.1). Twelve percent of patients heterozygous for factor V Leiden were also heterozygous for factor II G20210A and conversely 23% of patients heterozygous for factor II G20210A were also heterozygous for factor V Leiden. Furthermore, in this large population we analyzed the effect of oral contraceptive (OC) in women carrying one of these mutations. Odds ratio for VTE associated with OC was 2.29 (1.72-3.04). In factor V Leiden carriers using OC, the odds ratio for VTE was 10.25 (5.69-1 8.45). The odds ratio of the association of factor II mutation and OC use was 7.14 (3.39-15.04). Finally, we also confirmed that the frequency of factor V Leiden was lower in patients with pulmonary embolism than in patients with deep vein thrombosis without PE (odds ratio 0.69). Conversely, factor II G20210A mutation was equally balanced in both patient groups.     

The impact of dalteparin (Fragmin) on thrombin generation in pregnant women with venous thromboembolism: significance of the factor V Leiden mutation

Hypercoagulability is observed in patients with inherited thrombophilia, e.g. factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation. Pregnancy represents a hypercoagulable state as well. This study addresses the effects of the FVL mutation on haemostatic activation during pregnancy as indicated by prothrombin fragments (F1+2). 233 pregnant women with no history of venous thromboembolism were studied. Additionally, two patient groups (25 pregnant FVL carriers and 36 pregnant women without thrombophilic diathesis) in whom low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) was used prophylactically against rethrombosis were investigated. None of the women developed clinical signs of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or after delivery. Untreated women exhibited substantial hypercoagulability. F1+2 levels were similar in FVL carriers and non-carriers (difference n. s.). After sufficient adjustment for anti-factor Xa activity (> or =0.15; < or =0.4 U/mL), heparinized women without any thrombophilic diathesis had significantly lower levels of F1+2 than untreated pregnant women. This was evident only in the first and second trimenon (p <0.001). F1+2 levels in heparinized FVL carriers were quite similar to the levels observed in untreated pregnant women, however. In conclusion, our data support the thesis that in comparison to asymptomatic patients, thrombin generation is exaggerated in symptomatic FVL carriers. Coagulation activation during pregnancy can be reduced by dalteparin.     

Genetic risk factors for superficial vein thrombosis.

Inherited thrombophilic states are associated with an increased risk for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but whether they are also risk factors for superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) is uncertain. We assessed the risk conferred by inherited thrombophilic states in patients with a first episode of SVT in whom the coexistence of DVT had been ruled out by ultrasonography. Sixty-three patients with SVT, after exclusion of patients with varicose veins, malignant or autoimmune disease, and 537 healthy individuals were investigated. The G1691A mutation in the factor V gene, the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene, and deficiencies of the naturally occurring inhibitors of coagulation (antithrombin, protein C, protein S) were searched. The prevalence of each thrombophilic state was higher in patients than in controls. The odds ratios for SVT were 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6 to 14.2) in patients with the G1691A factor V mutation, 4.3 (95% CI, 1.5 to 12.6) in those with the G20210A prothrombin mutation, and 12.9 (95% CI, 3.6 to 46.2) in those with deficiencies of the naturally occurring inhibitors of coagulation taken together. Risks did not substantially change when the analysis was restricted to 43 patients who had SVT as their only thrombotic manifestation, being 4.3 (95% CI, 1.5 to 12.3) in patients with factor V mutation, and 3.6 (95% CI, 1.0 to 13.1) in those with the prothrombin mutation. Among the circumstantial risk factors investigated (surgery, trauma, prolonged immobilization, oral contraceptives and pregnancy or puerperium), pregnancy or puerperium was the most frequently associated with SVT, being present in 38% of women. Our findings indicate that inherited thrombophilic states are associated with an increased risk for SVT. Hence, a laboratory search of these alterations is recommended in patients with SVT, because it allows the identification of patients at high risk of DVT in whom antithrombotic prophylaxis is particularly warranted.     

Procarboxypeptidase U (TAFI) contributes to the risk of thrombosis in patients with hereditary thrombophilia

IntroductionIt is considered that high plasma levels of procarboxypeptidase U (proCPU or TAFI) can promote the development of thrombosis, but data comparing proCPU levels in thrombophilia carriers and healthy subjects are rather scarce. Moreover, the results of previous studies on the risk of thrombosis related to high proCPU concentration in this population were not consistent. Although the 325 polymorphism of proCPU has a significant effect on the CPU half-life, it's influence on the risk of thrombosis or spontaneous pregnancy loss in carriers of hereditary thrombophilia is not clear.Materials and MethodsThe study population consisted of 144 thrombophilic patients (94 heterozygous and 10 homozygous carriers of FV Leiden, 26 heterozygous carriers of the prothrombin G20210A variation and 14 double carriers of FV Leiden and FII variation) and 69 healthy controls.ResultsThe results show that patients with inherited thrombophilia have a tendency toward lower mean proCPU plasma levels compared to healthy controls, however, this difference was only significant in carriers of FII G20210A (p = 0.014). A higher frequency of the most stable Ile325Ile proCPU was seen among carriers of FII G20210A mutation compared to the control group (19% vs 7%; p = 0.186).In the second part of the study proCPU as a risk factor for thrombosis was evaluated. In heterozygous carriers of FV Leiden or FII G20210A high levels of proCPU conferred to an almost 4-fold increased risk for spontaneous onset thrombosis. The more stable Ile325Ile proCPU seems to impose a higher risk for clinical manifestation of the thrombophilic condition. Finally, a significant positive correlation between F1+2 and proCPU concentration was seen.ConclusionThe increased risk of thrombosis in thrombophilia patients is not only ascribable to an increased thrombin generation, but also high levels of proCPU and the presence of the 325Ile genotype tip the balance towards thrombotic tendency even further.     

Thrombophilic abnormalities and recurrence of venous thromboembolism in patients treated with standardized anticoagulant treatment

INTRODUCTION: Whether patients with hereditary or acquired thrombophilia have an increased risk for recurrence of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of recurrence of venous thromboembolism in patients with and without thrombophilic abnormalities treated with standardized anticoagulant treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Database was from a prospective multicenter randomized study aimed at evaluating the long-term clinical benefit of extending to 1 year the 3-month oral anticoagulant treatment after a first episode of idiopathic proximal deep vein thrombosis. The screening for thrombophilia included antithrombin, protein C, protein S deficiencies, resistance to activated protein C and/or factor V R506Q mutation, the mutation 20210GA of the prothrombin gene, hyperhomocysteinemia and antiphospholipid antibodies. The diagnosis of venous thromboembolism recurrence was done by objective tests and adjudicated by a panel unaware of the results of the thrombophilia screening. RESULTS: A screening for thrombophilic abnormalities was performed in 195 patients. Twenty of 57 (35.1%) thrombophilic patients experienced a recurrence of venous thromboembolism as compared with 29 of 138 (21.0%) patients without thrombophilia (HR=1.78, 95% CI 1.002-3.140, p=0.046). The difference in VTE recurrence between patients with and without thrombophilia was accounted for by those who received 3 months of oral anticoagulation (HR=3.21, 95% CI 1.349-7.616, p=0.008). No difference between thrombophilic and non-thrombophilic patients was observed in the time interval from the index episode to recurrent venous thromboembolism (29.1+/-23.9 and 30.6+/-19.8 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombophilic abnormalities are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence. The role of thrombophilia in the long-term management of venous thromboembolism should be addressed in prospective management studies.     

Oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, thrombophilias and risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. The Thrombosis: Risk and Economic Assessment of Thrombophilia Screening (TREATS) Study

Combined oral contraceptives, oral hormone replacement therapy and thrombophilias are recognised risk factors for venous thromboembolism in women. The objective of this study was to assess the risk of thromboembolism among women with thrombophilia who are taking oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy, conducting a systematic review and metaanalysis. Of 201 studies identified, only nine met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies included pre-menopausal women on oral contraceptives and two studies included peri-menopausal women on hormone replacement therapy. For oral contraceptive use, significant associations of the risk of venous thromboembolism were found in women with factor V Leiden (OR 15.62; 95%CI 8.66 to 28.15); deficiencies of antithrombin (OR 12.60; 95%CI 1.37 to 115.79), protein C (OR 6.33; 95%CI 1.68 to 23.87), or protein S (OR 4.88; 95%CI 1.39 to 17.10), elevated levels of factor VIIIc (OR 8.80; 95%CI 4.13 to 18.75); and factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A (OR 7.85; 95%CI 1.65 to 37.41). For hormone replacement therapy, a significant association was found in women with factor V Leiden (OR 13.16; 95%CI 4.28 to 40.47). Although limited by the small number of studies, the findings of this study support the presence of interaction between thrombophilia and venous thromboembolism among women taking oral contraceptives. However, further studies are required to establish with greater confidence the associations of these, and other, thrombophilias with venous thromboembolism among hormone users.     

Inherited thrombophilia as a risk factor for the development of ischemic stroke in young adults

INTRODUCTION: Several recent studies have analyzed a possible effect of thrombophilia risk factors such as factor V Leiden, the prothrombin variant (allele 20210 A), and homozygosity for thermolabile methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR-T) on the development of ischemic stroke (IS). In the present study, we determined the role of these prothrombotic polymorphisms in the early onset of arterial IS or cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in a group of young Brazilian adults of Caucasian and African descent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 167 survivors of IS (153 patients with arterial IS and 14 cases of CVT; 66 men: 101 women; 124 of Caucasian and 43 of African origin; median age: 32.6 years; range: 15 to 45 years) and compared the prevalence of inherited thrombophilia risk factors with a control group of 225 sex and age matched individuals of the same ethnic background. To determine the interaction with atherogenic risk factors, the following diagnoses were considered: hypertension, hyperlipoproteinemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking status and use of oral contraceptives. RESULTS: In the arterial IS group, no significant variation was found between patients and controls of Caucasian origin regarding the prevalence of factor V Leiden (P = 0.92), the prothrombin variant (P = 0.13) or homozygosity for MTHFR-T (P = 0.61). Among Brazilians of African descent, 10.3% were homozygous for MTHFR-T, which was significantly elevated, odds ratio of 5.9 (95% CI: 0.88 to 49.15). In the CVT group, two Caucasian patients (20%) were heterozygous for the prothrombin variant, odds ratio of 9.7 (95% CI: 0.95 to 89.71) and one patient was carrier of factor V Leiden (P = 0.49). No prothrombotic polymorphism was identified in patients with CVT of African descent. All women in the CVT group were in use of oral contraceptives or in the post-partum state. DISCUSSION: Inherited thrombophilia risk factors were not found to increase the risk of arterial IS among young patients of Caucasian descent. However, a potential role of homozygosity for MTHFR-T was observed in a small group of patients of African origin. The analysis of patients with CVT revealed an increased risk due to the prothrombin gene variant or oral contraceptive use. Further studies including all incoming patients with IS are necessary to evaluate the impact of inherited thrombophilia risk factors on early mortality.     

Venous thromboembolism in carriers of the Factor V Leiden mutation and in patients without known thrombophilic risk factor; prediction of recurrence and APC-PCI complex concentration and/or soluble thrombomodulin antigen and activity

BACKGROUND: The complex between activated protein C (APC) and the protein C inhibitor (PCI) is a sensitive indicator of the degree of activation of blood coagulation and higher concentrations have been measured in carriers of the FV Leiden mutation who were in the recovery phase after treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to correlate the APC-PCI complex concentration to thrombomodulin activity and antigen concentration in the same group of patients. We also add a prospective clinical follow-up of the VTE recurrence after 1 year to investigate if the markers can predict the risk for a new VTE. PATIENTS/METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 50 patients with the FV Leiden mutation and 132 without any known risk factor for thrombophilia after finished treatment. RESULTS: The APC-PCI complex, s-TM activity and the quotient (s-TM activity)/(s-TM antigen) were higher in VTE patients with FV Leiden. In total, there were 19 VTE recurrences (10%) after 1 year. The OR for recurrence was 1.9 (95% CI 0.68-5.0) in all VTE patients with elevated APC-PCI complex (above 75th percentile) and 3.6 (95% CI 1.1-12) in VTE patients without any known risk factor for thrombophilia and with elevated s-TM activity. CONCLUSION: The APC-PCI complex concentration, s-TM activity and the quotient (s-TM activity)/(s-TM antigen) were higher in VTE patients with FV Leiden. The s-TM activity showed higher OR for recurrence of VTE in patients without known thrombophilic risk factor. Both methods could be sensitive markers of increased risk for venous thrombosis.