The Efficacy of Lamotrigine in Children and Adolescents with Refractory Generalized Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study

Summary: Purpose: We report a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of lamotrigine (LTG) as add-on treatment in therapy-resistant, generalized epilepsy in children and adolescents (n = 30).
Methods: Twenty patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Each patient acted as his or her own control. LTG and placebo were randomly added to existing antiepileptic medication (AEDs). The LTG dosage was individualized in an open phase preceding the placebo/treatment phase. Patients who responded to LTG in the open phase went on to the double-blind phase. "Responders" were defined as patients with a >50% seizure reduction or less severe seizures or both, or improved behavior or improved motor skills or both. "Nonresponders" were defined as children who showed no positive effects of LTG with plasma levels of 10 μg/ml or children who had adverse events during the open phase.
Results: There was a clear statistically significant reduction of seizure frequency in LTG compared with placebo treatment. None of the children studied showed abnormal biochemical or hematologic findings, or changes in plasma levels of concomitantly administered AEDs.
Conclusions: LTG is a well-tolerated and effective treatment in children with intractable generalized epilepsies, including those with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The study design allowed a double-blind placebo-controlled assessment of LTG although the participating children used 19 different AED combinations at entry.     

Lamotrigine Therapy for Partial Seizures: A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial

Summary: The efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG), a new antiepileptic drug (AED), were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study of 98 patients with refractory partial seizures. Each treatment period lasted 14 weeks. Most patients were titrated to a LTG maintenance dose of 400 mglday. Seizure frequency with LTG decreased by ≥50%, as compared with placebo, in one fifth of patients. Overall median seizure frequency decreased by 25% with LTG as compared with placebo (p < 0.001). With LTG, the number of seizure days decreased by 18% as compared with placebo (p < 0.01), and investigator global evaluation of overall patient clinical status favored LTG by 2: 1 (p = 0.013). Plasma LTG concentrations appeared to be linearly related to dosage. LTG had no clinically important effects on the plasma concentrations of concomitant AEds. Adverse experiences were generally minor and most frequently were CNS-related (e.g., ataxia, dizziness, diplopia, headache). Most were transient and resolved without discontinuing treatment. Five patients withdrew as a result of adverse experiences while receiving LTG, including 3 patients with rash. One placebo patient was also withdrawn because of rash. The addition of twice-daily LTG to an existing AED regimen was safe, effective, and well tolerated in these medically refractory partial seizure patients.     

Lamotrigine: A Review of Antiepileptic Efficacy

Summary: Lamotrigine (LTG) is a chemically novel anti-epileptic drug (AED) that blocks voltage-sensitive sodium channels, leading to inhibition of neurotransmitter release, principally glutamate. LTG is active in a wide range of pharmacologic models of epilepsy, demonstrating a potency and duration of action generally superior to currently available AEDs. Preliminary evidence of efficacy was provided by single-dose studies showing effects on reducing interictal spike activity and photoconvulsive response. A total of eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trials have established the efficacy of LTG in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Literature reports suggest LTG also is effective in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy, including absence seizures, and in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Other reports suggest that LTG is useful in the pediatric population, and an interim report of an open monotherapy trial suggests that the efficacy of LTG was comparable to that of carbamazepine (CBZ) but the adverse experiences leading to discontinuation were less frequent.     

Cross-reactivity pattern of rash from current aromatic antiepileptic drugs

We have investigated cross-reactivity of rash among the current aromatic antiepileptic drugs, particularly between the new and the traditional compounds. A retrospective survey of medical records concerning all aromatic antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment in consecutive adult patients with epilepsy was performed. Altogether 663 patients were included comprising 2567 exposures to AEDs. Skin reactions occurred in 93 patients and sequential rashes related to aromatic drugs in 17. Phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) caused rashes in the range of 27-35% in patients with a history of another AED-related rash, whereas lamotrigine (LTG) caused another rash in 17%. A history of an AED-related rash was significantly associated with reactions to PHT, CBZ, and OXC (p<0.001). The association was only borderline significant for LTG (p=0.05). Nevertheless, the occurrence was consistently increased in all subgroups with reactions to other AEDs. A CBZ rash was not significantly associated with an LTG reaction, and vice versa, but the number of patients was limited. Less than one third of patients with a CBZ rash also reacted to OXC. No evidence for increased severity of sequential rashes was found. Clinicians should be aware of the cross-reactivity of the aromatic AEDs regarding cutaneous adverse events, as well as their differences in this respect. LTG appears to be involved in cross-reactions less often than CBZ, OXC and PHT.     

Comparative retention rates and long-term tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs.

OBJECTIVE: Retention rates of five new anti-epileptic medications (AEDs) were compared in order to evaluate their long-term tolerability and efficacy. METHOD: We acquired the retention data on levetiracetam (LEV), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), topiramate (TPM), and zonisamide (ZNS) from the electronic database. The data included patient's age, gender, seizure type, current and previous medications, dosage, main reasons for discontinuation, and duration of therapy. The retention rates of these AEDs were evaluated at 4, 12, 24, 52, and 104 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 828 new AED exposures were obtained (LEV=196, LTG=251, OXC=97, TPM=156, ZNS=128) from patients with partial or generalized epilepsy. At 2 years, retention rate was highest with LTG (74.1%), followed by ZNS (60.2%), OXC (58.8%), LEV (53.6%), and TPM (44.2%). When these AEDs were discontinued, it was mainly due to inefficacy (29.5%) and sedating side-effects (20.5%), and commonly within 6 months into therapy. Several important AED specific side-effects leading to discontinuation were identified, including behavioral or irritability from LEV, rash from LTG and OXC, nausea from OXC and ZNS, hyponatremia from OXC, and kidney stones from TPM and ZNS. CONCLUSION: Comparing retention rates of new AEDs can provide useful insight into their tolerability and efficacy. This study showed highest retention rate with LTG, which was significantly different from ZNS (p=0.0025), LEV (p<0.0001), OXC (p=0.0024), and TPM (p<0.0001). Beside ineffectiveness, other leading causes of discontinuation were adverse behavioral effects with LEV, rash with LTG and OXC, and sedation for TPM and ZNS.     

Lamotrigine High-Dose Tolerability and Safety in Patients with Epilepsy: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Eleven-Week Study

Summary: Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the dose tolerability and safety of a chronic ascending twice-daily (b.i.d.) dosage regimen of 700 mg/day larnotrigine (LTG) and to include determination of the LTG pharmacokinetic profile at doses 500 mg/day in patients receiving concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: Twelve adult male epileptic patients treated with enzyme-inducing AEDs received 700 mg/day (b.i.d.) oral LTG (n = 8) or placebo (controls, n = 4). For 3 weeks, as outpatients they had their LTG dosage increased from 100 to 400 mg/day. Then, in a clinical research study unit, patients received regimens of 500, 600, and 700 mg/day for 1 week each. Controls received matching placebo in the same sequence. At study end, dosages were tapered in 2 weeks. Follow-up evaluations were made 7 days later. Results: Five LTG patients tolerated 700 mg/day for 1 week. LTG was reduced to 600 mg/day in a patient with mild diplopia and to 500 mg/day in a patient with mild oscillopsia and diplopia. One patient discontinued 300-mg/day therapy with a moderately intense diffuse papular skin rash, attributed to LTG. Headache, drowsiness, faintness, and diplopia, the common adverse events (AEs), were mild to moderate in intensity and occurred in 50–75% of patients in both groups (except for diplopia, occurring only with LTG). Concomitant AED plasma concentrations were not markedly changed by LTG. LTG pharmacokinetics were linear over the range of 500–700 mg/day. Conclusions: LTG doses 700 mg/day can be tolerated in patients receiving concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs.     

Rash from antiepileptic drugs: influence by gender, age, and learning disability

PURPOSE: Cutaneous adverse reactions from antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are common, but have received little scientific attention from a clinical point of view. We wanted to study the incidence of skin reactions of current AEDs and to explore their relation to clinical parameters such as gender, age, and learning disability. METHODS: Consecutive patients with epilepsy were studied retrospectively. A detailed survey of medical records concerning all treatment with AEDs was performed. RESULTS: A total of 663 patients were included with altogether 2,567 exposures to 15 different AEDs. Skin reactions were found in 14% of the patients and in 5% of the exposures. Ninety-seven percent of the reactions occurred to either carbamazepine (CBZ, 11%), phenytoin (PHT, 8%), lamotrigine (LTG, 8%), oxcarbazepine (8%), or phenobarbital (2%). Skin reactions developed significantly more often in females than in males (19% vs. 8%), and significantly less often in patients with learning disability than in other patients (7% vs. 16%). These differences were significant for CBZ, PHT, and LTG when analyzed separately. Females displayed higher rash frequency during the reproductive years, while men experienced less frequent rash in the same phase of life. CONCLUSIONS: Fertile females have a higher risk for skin reactions compared to males, probably due to hormonal factors. Patients with learning disability appeared to have a lower risk than other patients in this study. Hygiene factors may possibly be underlying.     

Lamictal (Lamotrigine) Monotherapy for Typical Absence Seizures in Children

PURPOSE: To investigate whether lamotrigine (LTG) monotherapy is effective and safe for newly diagnosed typical absence seizures in children and adolescents (aged 3-15 years, n = 45). METHODS: A "responder-enriched" study design was used: open-label dose escalation was followed by placebo-controlled, double-blind testing of LTG. Conventional hyperventilation testing with EEG recording was used to confirm diagnoses and assess treatment success defined as complete freedom from seizures. Ambulatory 24-h EEG recordings provided supporting evidence of effectiveness. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events, vital signs, and physical, neurologic, and laboratory examinations. Plasma samples were taken to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of LTG. RESULTS: During initial open-label dose escalation, 71.4% of patients (intent-to-treat) or 82% (per protocol analysis) became seizure free; individual patients responded at doses ranging from 2 to 15 mg/kg/day (median, 5.0). In the placebo-controlled, double-blind phase of the study, statistically significantly more patients remained seizure free when treated with LTG (62%) than with placebo (21%; p < 0.02; for the intent-to-treat analysis). Mean plasma concentrations of LTG, were linearly related to dose, although there was substantial interindividual variation. No patients were withdrawn from the study for any safety-related reason. CONCLUSIONS: LTG monotherapy is effective for typical absence seizures in children and is generally well tolerated.     

Predictors of Lamotrigine-associated rash

PURPOSE: To determine the predictors of lamotrigine-associated rash (LTG-rash) and the incidence of serious and benign LTG-rash to individualize risk assessment in a given patient. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all 988 outpatients seen at the Columbia Comprehensive Epilepsy Center between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2003, who received LTG. Charts were reviewed for documentation of rash developing from any medication, including antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and non-AEDs, and including remote histories of drug-related rashes. Demographics, medical history, and medication variables were tested as potential predictors of LTG-rash. RESULTS: Fifty-six (5.7%) of 988 patients experienced rash attributed to LTG, and 39 (3.9%) discontinued LTG because of rash. No patients experienced toxic epidermal necrolysis or required hospitalization because of LTG-rash. One case of mild probable Stevens-Johnson syndrome occurred. In multivariate analysis, a history of rash after another AED was the strongest predictor of LTG-rash (13.9% vs. 4.6%; OR = 3.62; p < 0.001), with children younger than 13 years also experiencing significantly more LTG-rash (10.7% vs. 4.3%; OR = 2.77; p < 0.001). In children with a rash attributed to another AED, 18.2% experienced LTG-rash, whereas in adults without a rash from another AED, 3% experienced LTG-rash. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this retrospective analysis, a history of another AED-related rash is the greatest risk factor for developing rash to LTG; age younger than 13 years is also a risk factor. Severe rash is rare when using the currently recommended titration rate.     

Lamotrigine-induced rash--worth a rechallenge

OBJECTIVES: The only serious adverse event associated with lamotrigine (LTG) treatment is a hypersensitivity reaction primarily presenting as a rash. Despite this concern, LTG is an antiepileptic drug (AED) with one of the most favorable efficacy/tolerability ratio compared with the new as well as the old AEDs. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the results of rechallenge with LTG after the initial rash. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 688 patients (350 as monotherapy, and 338 as add-on therapy) with either idiopathic generalized epilepsy or focal epilepsy were treated with LTG. The patients with LTG-induced rash were rechallenged to LTG. The dosage schedule was: 5 mg every day or every second day for 14 days, increased by 5 mg every 14th day to 25 mg a day. After achieving the daily dosage of 25 mg/day, the up-titration was completed following the current guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients developed a rash. The LTG-induced rash occurred in 6%, where 12 (1.8%) developed a rash shown to be coincidentally associated with the initiation of LTG therapy. In their cases LTG was continued with success without intermission. Nineteen (38%) of the initial cohort were rechallenged with LTG, with a success rate of 84%. CONCLUSION: This study is the first one to provide a successful recipe verified in time for the rechallenge with LTG after the initial drug-induced rash. Importantly, the concurrent use of valproate (VPA) was not found in this study to represent an additional risk factor for the occurrence of the rash during rechallenge with LTG. Our results agree with previous findings that women are more likely to develop the rash (P < 0.009).     

Characteristics of patients initiated on the new antiepileptic drugs: a PADS study

Whereas randomized controlled trials remain a standard for evaluating and comparing efficacy and safety of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), postmarketing drug research offers a useful means of comparing efficacy and safety of new AEDs. However, differences in baseline characteristics of patients in different drug groups create the potential for bias in drug comparison studies. In this study, baseline demographic characteristics of 1,386 patients initiating lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), or topiramate (TPM) were compared to identify patient characteristics that may influence AED use in epilepsy patients. Data were collected at 14 epilepsy centers and included medications, seizure types and syndromes, and prior adverse events. There were 402 patients in the LTG group, 725 TPM, and 259 TGB. The groups differed both in their number of concurrent AEDs (p<0.001) and in their number of prior AEDs (p<0.01). There was no difference in proportion with partial versus generalized epilepsy syndromes. The groups differed in the proportions of patients with complex partial seizures (p=0.049), primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (p=0.01), and myoclonic seizures (p=0.03). Baseline behavioral adverse event rate was lowest in patients initiating TPM (p<0.01); LTG patients had the lowest rate of prior AED-related rash (p=0.02). There was no relationship between AED assignment and patient age, age of epilepsy onset, epilepsy duration, institutionalization status, gender, or psychiatric history. Numerous epidemiological differences were identified among patients placed on the new AEDs, including current and prior AED profiles, seizure types, and prior adverse event history. Accounting for these differences is of crucial importance because they may bias conclusions of nonrandomized post-marketing trials comparing the drugs.     

Clinical Pharmacology of Lamotrigine

Summary: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lamotrigine (LTG), a new antiepileptic drug (AED), were studied in healthy volunteers. In an open dose-escalating study, LTG 240 mg produced peak plasma concentrations of around 3 μg/mg with no significant adverse events. Subsequent pharmacokinetic studies revealed complete oral absorption, first-order kinetics with a mean half-life of approximately 1 day, and elimination mainly as a glucuronide in the urine. Early studies in patients with epilepsy revealed more rapid metabolism when given with enzyme-inducing AEDs and delayed metabolism by valproate. A placebo-controlled, double-blind study compared LTG 120 and 240 mg with phenytoin (PHT) 500 and 1,000 mg, and diazepam (DZP) 10 mg. Visual analogue scales showed sedation after PHT 1,000 mg and DZP 10 mg, but not after LTG. Smooth pursuit eye movements and adaptive tracking were impaired by DZP and PHT 1,000 mg. LTG did not affect these variables. A comparison of LTG 150 and 300 mg and carbamazepine (CBZ) 200, 400, and 600 mg demonstrated impairment of smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements by CBZ 600 and 400 mg, but not by LTG. Additionally, CBZ 600 mg impaired adaptive tracking and increased body sway and heart rate. These studies have shown LTG to have desirable and predictable pharmacokinetic properties for an AED. Pharmacodynamic effects were absent, suggesting a high therapeutic index.     

Lamotrigine Monotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Untreated Epilepsy: A Double-Blind Comparison with Phenytoin

PURPOSE: Lamotrigine is an effective add-on therapy against a range of epileptic seizure types. Comparative studies with carbamazepine (CBZ) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy suggest similar efficacy. In this study, lamotrigine (LTG) and phenytoin (PHT) are compared. METHODS: In a double-blind parallel-groups study, 181 patients with newly diagnosed untreated partial seizures or secondarily or primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures were randomised to two treatment groups. One group (n = 86) received LTG titrated over 6 weeks from a starting dose of 100 mg/day. The other (n = 95) received PHT titrated from 200 mg/day. Treatment continued for < or =48 weeks. RESULTS: The percentages of patients remaining on each treatment and seizure free during the last 24 and 40 weeks of the study, and times to first seizure after the first 6 weeks of treatment (dose-titration period), did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. These were measures of efficacy. Time to discontinuation, a composite index of efficacy and safety, likewise did not distinguish between treatments. Adverse events led to discontinuation of 13 (15%) patients from LTG and 18 (19%) from PHT. The adverse-event profile for LTG was dominated by skin rash [discontinuation of 10 (11.6%) patients compared with five (5.3%) from PHT] rather than central nervous system side effects: asthenia, somnolence, and ataxia were each significantly more frequent in the PHT group. The high rate of rash with LTG was probably due to the high starting dose and may be avoidable. A quality-of-life instrument, the SEALS inventory, favoured LTG. Patients taking PHT showed the biochemical changes expected of an enzyme-inducing drug, whereas those taking LTG did not. CONCLUSIONS: LTG and PHT monotherapy were similarly effective against these seizure types in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. LTG was better tolerated, more frequently causing rash, but with a lower incidence of central nervous system side effects.     

Controlled Trial of Lamotrigine (Lamictar) for Refractory Partial Seizures

The antiepileptic effect of lamotrigine (LTG) was assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in 24 adult patients with refractory partial seizures. LTG or placebo was added to existing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The dose of LTG varied from 75 to 400 mg daily. Three patients did not complete the trial. One was withdrawn from the trial with ataxia, tiredness, dyspnea, and diplopia while receiving LTG and died 18 days later of invasive carcinoma involving the liver. A second patient was withdrawn during baseline for contravening admission criteria, and a third received LTG in error during both treatment periods. Twenty-one patients (12 men and 9 women) completed the trial. An analysis of seizure counts in the 12-week treatment period with LTG showed a statistically significant reduction in seizures as compared with placebo for total seizures (p less than 0.002), partial seizures (p less than 0.002), and secondarily generalized seizures (p less than 0.05). The analysis of total seizure days showed a significant reduction during LTG treatment (p less than 0.002). There were no statistically significant changes in plasma concentrations of phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), primidone (PRM), or phenobarbital (PB) between the two treatment periods. The most common adverse events reported during the trial were diplopia, drowsiness, tiredness, ataxia, and headache, but although these were more frequent during LTG treatment, the differences from placebo were not statistically significant. No hematological or biochemical changes were noted.     

Maintenance treatment outcomes in older patients with bipolar I disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and tolerability of mood stabilizers in older adults with bipolar disorder remains understudied. Authors retrospectively examined response to lamotrigine, lithium, and placebo in older (>or=age 55) adults with Bipolar I disorder (DSM-IV) who participated in two mixed-age, maintenance studies examining time to intervention for an emerging mood episode (manic/hypomanic/mixed or depressed) and drug tolerability. METHODS: In all, 588 patients received double-blind lamotrigine (LTG, 100 mg-400 mg/day), lithium (Li, 0.8 mEq/L-1.1 mEq/L), or placebo (PBO); data from 98 older adults (LTG: 33, Li: 34, PBO: 31) were examined. Mean modal total daily doses were LTG 240 mg and Li 750 mg. RESULTS: LTG significantly delayed time to intervention for any mood episode and for a depressive episode, compared with placebo. Li significantly delayed time to intervention for mania/hypomania/mixed compared with placebo. Back pain and headache were the most common adverse events during LTG treatment; rash: LTG, 3%; Li, 6%; and PBO, 0; no serious rash was reported. The most common adverse events (>10%) during lithium treatment were dyspraxia, tremor, xerostomia, headache, infection, amnesia, dizziness, diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine and lithium may be effective and well-tolerated maintenance therapies for older adults with Bipolar I depression.     

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: what can we learn from long‐term studies?

OBJECTIVE: A review of long-term open-label studies was performed with the aim of detecting differences in efficacy and/or tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: From more than 500 open studies conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), pregabalin (PGB), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM) or zonisamide (ZNS), we selected all studies that reported or allowed us to calculate the number of patients who achieved seizure freedom for 6 months and/or the number of patients withdrawing for adverse effects and/or the number or percentage of patients continuing treatment after 1 year. RESULTS: No studies were found in which this information was available for OXC, PGB, TGB or ZNS. The number of patients who achieved seizure freedom for 6 months was reported in four studies each for GBP and TPM, five studies for LTG, and eight studies for LEV. The best efficacy profile using this end point was found for LEV, followed by TPM, LTG, and GBP. Twenty-two studies reported the number of patients withdrawing due to adverse effects. LEV was the best-tolerated AED, a little ahead of LTG, and significantly better than GBP or TPM . TPM was by far the least well-tolerated drug. Information concerning patients continuing treatment after 1 year was reported in two GBP studies, two TPM studies, six LEV studies and five LTG studies. GBP had a very low retention rate (between 20% and 25% of patients continued the drug), while TPM and LTG had a retention rate of 40-60% and LEV had a retention rate of 60-75%. CONCLUSION: One limitation of these rankings is that their statistical value is limited because of the indirect nature of the comparisons. Anyhow, this review covers the main studies published thus far on this subject and provides full updated information on the current literature about these drugs.     

Gabapentin versus lamotrigine monotherapy: a double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy

PURPOSE: This randomised, double-blind study compared the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) gabapentin (GBP) and lamotrigine (LTG) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: Patients with partial seizures with and/or without secondary generalization or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either GBP or LTG. During 2- and 6-week titration periods, respectively, GBP dosage reached 1,800 mg/day, and LTG, 150 mg/day. In the subsequent 24-week maintenance phase, the dose could be adjusted based on seizure control or adverse events between 1,200 and 3,600 mg/day for GBP and 100 and 300 mg/day for LTG. The primary end point was time to exit, a composite of efficacy and tolerability. Evaluable patients were used for the primary efficacy analysis, whereas tolerability was examined on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients was randomized, and 291 (148 GBP, 143 LTG) were included in the evaluable population. Nineteen patients in each group had an exit event. The median time to exit was 69 days for GBP and 48 days for LTG. The hazard ratio was estimated as 1.043 (90% confidence intervals, 0.602-1.809). Overall, 106 (71.6% of the evaluable population) GBP-treated and 96 (67.1%) LTG-treated patients completed the study. Of those, 80 (75.5%) patients taking GBP and 73 (76.0%) taking LTG remained seizure free during the final 12 weeks of treatment. Only 14 (8.9%) GBP-treated patients and 15 (9.9%) LTG-treated patients withdrew because of study drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: GBP and LTG monotherapy were similarly effective and well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.     

Overview of the Clinical Efficacy of Lamotrigine

Summary: Testing the efficacy of lamotrigine (LTG) in epileptic patients has been approached in several ways. The first pilot study examined the effect of a single dose of LTG in patients with frequent interictal spikes, and a reduction in spike frequency was observed. Subsequently, single doses reduced photosensitivity in appropriate patients. Single-blind administration of LTG for 1 week in addition to the patients' regular antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), in patients with refractory seizures, reduced seizures despite the short duration of therapy. This regimen was continued using a placebo-controlled crossover study with 1-week duration of treatment. Efficacy in partial and tonic-clonic seizures was subsequently confirmed in four double-blind crossover studies; a meta-analysis of these four studies showed a 30% reduction in partial seizures despite the intractable nature of the seizures in the patients included. Current studies aim at evaluating the drug as monotherapy and in different seizure types.     

Lamotrigine in Treatment of 120 Children with Epilepsy

Summary: One hundred twenty children aged 10 months to 16 years 9 months were included in three studies with lamotrigine (LTG): a single-blind study (n = 60), a pharmacokinetic study (n = 23), and a compassionate group (n = 37). At 3 months, 11 patients had become seizure-free and 34 had >50% decrease in seizure frequency. The best results involved absence epilepsy, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), and other symptomatic generalized epilepsy. Forty-two patients were followed > 1 year, 22 for a mean of 2.2 years, and there was no significant increase in seizure frequency as compared with 3-month follow-up. Fourteen patients became seizure-free for >6 months; all except 1 had generalized epilepsy. For 12 patients, treatment could be reduced to monotherapy, but for those with valproate (VPA) comedication LTG dosage had to be increased; 25% of patients with VPA monotherapy exhibited skin rash, appearing 3–18 days after starting LTG. For 4 patients, LTG could be reintroduced after VPA was withdrawn. Ten patients had ataxia and/or drowsiness and 2 had vomiting. For all other patients, tolerance was excellent.