Age at onset for familial epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE--To provide age-specific risks for ovarian cancer for relatives of ovarian cancer case patients. To characterize the age at onset for ovarian cancer for women with a single relative vs several relatives affected with ovarian cancer. DESIGN--Three previous studies were reexamined. The cumulative probability of ovarian cancer in first-degree relatives of women with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer and matched control subjects who participated in the Cancer and Steroid Hormone (CASH) Study was determined. The age of onset of ovarian cancer in women with and without relatives with ovarian cancer in a Washington, DC, case-control study was contrasted with that of women with at least two first-degree relatives studied at the National Cancer Institute (NCI). RESULTS--The CASH Study data showed that first-degree relatives of women with ovarian cancer had an increased risk for ovarian cancer, especially at older ages, when compared with relatives of control subjects. However, the median age at onset was the same among women in the Washington, DC, study with and without an affected relative. Among the women with an extensive family history of ovarian cancer studied at the NCI, the age at onset was considerably younger (47 years) than is typical for this disease (59 years). Of these, 17% had been diagnosed as having primary ovarian cancer by age 40 years. CONCLUSIONS--Women who have one first-degree relative affected by ovarian cancer are at greater risk for ovarian cancer but not at an age earlier than the general population. The small proportion of women who have several affected relatives are, however, at a greater risk of early onset of ovarian cancer. Prophylactic oophorectomy may be reasonable for these women.     

The risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women who have used estrogen replacement therapy

We studied the association between estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and the risk of breast cancer as part of the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study. All subjects in the analysis were postmenopausal women enrolled from eight geographic areas. Women 25 to 54 years old with newly diagnosed breast cancer were identified through population-based tumor registries and diagnosed between Dec 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 1982. Controls were selected from the same eight geographic areas by the random digit dialing of residential telephone numbers. Analyses included 1369 cases and 1645 controls. Among women with bilateral oophorectomy, the relative risk of breast cancer for women who had ever used ERT was 1.3, compared with women who had never used ERT. Among women who had undergone hysterectomy but who still had at least one ovary, the relative risk was 1.1; among women who reported a natural menopause, the relative risk was 0.8. Overall, the risk of breast cancer did not appear to increase appreciably with increasing ERT duration or latency, even for durations and latencies of 20 years or longer.     

Risk of breast cancer with oral contraceptive use in women with a family history of breast cancer

CONTEXT: Oral contraceptive (OC) use is weakly associated with breast cancer risk in the general population, but the association among women with a familial predisposition to breast cancer is less clear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the association between OC use and risk of breast cancer is influenced by family history of the disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: Historical cohort study of 426 families of breast cancer probands diagnosed between 1944 and 1952 at the Tumor Clinic of the University of Minnesota Hospital. Follow-up data on families were collected by telephone interview between 1991 and 1996. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 394 sisters and daughters of the probands, 3002 granddaughters and nieces, and 2754 women who married into the families. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relative risk (RR) of breast cancer associated with history of OC use by relationship to proband. RESULTS: After accounting for age and birth cohort, ever having used OCs was associated with significantly increased risk of breast cancer among sisters and daughters of the probands (RR, 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-6.7), but not among granddaughters and nieces of the probands (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-2.0) or among marry-ins (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-1.9). Results were essentially unchanged after adjustment for parity, age at first birth, age at menarche, age at menopause, oophorectomy, smoking, and education. The elevated risk among women with a first-degree family history of breast cancer was most evident for OC use during or prior to 1975, when formulations were likely to contain higher dosages of estrogen and progestins (RR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5-7.2). A small number of breast cancer cases (n = 2) limited the statistical power to detect risk among women with a first-degree relative with breast cancer and OC use after 1975. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that women who have ever used earlier formulations of OCs and who also have a first-degree relative with breast cancer may be at particularly high risk for breast cancer. Further studies of women with a strong family history who have used more recent lower-dosage formulations of OCs are needed to determine how women with a familial predisposition to breast cancer should be advised regarding OC use today. JAMA. 2000;284:1791-1798.     

Reproductive events and family history as risk factors for breast cancer in northern Alberta.

Reproductive events and family history as risk factors for breast cancer in northern Alberta were investigated with the use of data from a computerized population-based registry. Women aged 30 to 79 years attending diagnostic breast clinics at the Cross Cancer Institute from 1971 through 1975 constituted the two study groups; 1232 women had diagnosed breast cancer (malignant disease group) and 602 women were clinically free of all types of breast disease (control group). An increased relative risk of breast cancer was found in women with a family history of breast cancer, those who gave birth to their first term infant at age 30 years or older, those in whom more than 15 years elapsed between menarche and that birth, and those with a late natural menopause. There was a decreased risk, relative to nulliparity, in the postmenopausal women who first gave birth to a term infant 5 years or less after menarche. Artificial menopause (bilateral oophorectomy), parity and age at menarche had no apparent effect on the risk. The pattern of risk factors in northern Alberta differed from that reported for other geographic areas, including other provinces of Canada, thus emphasizing the need for local studies in the planning of screening programs.     

BRCA1 Mutations and Breast Cancer in the General Population: Analyses in Women Before Age 35 Years and in Women Before Age 45 Years With First-Degree Family History

Context.— Studies of high-risk families with multiple early-onset cases of breast cancer have been useful for assessing the type and spectrum of germline mutations on the BRCA1 gene, but do not provide guidance to women with modest family history profiles. Thus, studies of women from the general population are needed to determine the BRCA1 mutation frequency in women perceived to be at high risk, and to develop profiles of those most likely to be carriers. Objective.— To characterize frequency and spectrum of germline BRCA1 mutations in 2 categories of women identified via population-based studies hypothesized to be at increased risk of carrying such mutations: those diagnosed as having breast cancer before age 35 years and those diagnosed before age 45 years who have first-degree breast cancer family history. Design.— Study subjects were drawn from 2 population-based case-control studies of breast cancer in young women on the basis of their family history or their age of diagnosis. Cases were younger than 35 years or were younger than 45 years with first-degree family history at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and were ascertained via a population-based cancer registry, and controls (women without breast cancer) were identified via random-digit dialing. Setting.— Three counties in western Washington State. Main Outcome Measure.— BRCA1 germline mutations in study subjects identified in DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis using primer pairs that span the BRCA1 coding region and intron-exon boundaries. Results.— Of 193 women diagnosed as having breast cancer before age 35 years, none of whom were selected on the basis of family history status, 12 (6.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2%-10.6%) had germline BRCA1 mutations. In 208 women diagnosed before age 45 years who had first-degree breast cancer family history, 15 (7.2%, 95% CI, 4.1%-11.6%) had germline mutations in BRCA1. In both groups, there were variations in mutation frequency noted by age and by family history. Mutation frequency decreased with increasing age of diagnosis. Higher proportions of mutations were seen in cases with at least 1 relative diagnosed as having breast cancer before age 45 years, in cases with greater numbers of affected relatives, and those with ovarian cancer family history. Mutation frequency did not vary by bilateral breast cancer family history. No frameshift or nonsense mutations were observed in 71 control women with a first-degree family history, although missense changes of unknown significance were seen in cases and controls. Conclusions.— Women with BRCA1 germline mutations lacked a common family history profile. Also, a large proportion of the women with a first-degree breast cancer family history and women diagnosed as having breast cancer before age 35 years did not carry germline BRCA1 mutations. Hence, while early-onset disease and a strong breast cancer family history may be useful guidelines for checking BRCA1 status, these findings on women drawn from the general population suggest that it may be difficult to develop BRCA1 mutation screening criteria among women with modest family history profiles.      

A meta-analysis of the effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the risk of breast cancer

To quantify the effect of estrogen replacement therapy on breast cancer risk, we combined dose-response slopes of the relative risk of breast cancer against the duration of estrogen use across 16 studies. Using this summary dose-response slope, we calculated the proportional increase in risk of breast cancer for each year of estrogen use. For women who experienced any type of menopause, risk did not appear to increase until after at least 5 years of estrogen use. After 15 years of estrogen use, we found a 30% increase in the risk of breast cancer (relative risk, 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 1.6). The increase in risk was largely due to results of studies that included premenopausal women or women using estradiol (with or without progestin), studies for which the estimated relative risk was 2.2 (CI, 1.4 to 3.4) after 15 years. Among women with a family history of breast cancer, those who had ever used estrogen replacement had a significantly higher risk (3.4; CI, 2.0 to 6.0) than those who had not (1.5; CI, 1.2 to 1.7).     

Oral contraceptive agents and breast cancer: a population-based case-control study

In this population-based case-control study that was conducted in Adelaide, South Australia, and which involved 395 case subjects and 386 control subjects who were aged 20 years to 69 years, the adjusted relative risk of breast cancer for women who had ever used oral contraceptive agents was 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.60). Relative risks that were associated with use of oral contraceptive agents for one month to 18 months and for 19 months or more before a first pregnancy were 1.09 (95% CI, 0.45-2.62) and 1.67 (95% CI, 0.63-4.42), respectively, but the trend was not statistically significant. Relatively-little variation in risk was found in association with the total duration of the use of oral contraceptive agents and with years since the first and the last use of oral contraceptive agents. When the risk of breast cancer in association with the use of oral contraceptive agents was examined across levels of risk factors of breast cancer (history of benign breast disease, family history of breast cancer and parity), the only relative risk which deviated markedly from unity was that which was associated with use of oral contraceptive agents in women with a history of benign breast disease; however, the relative risk of 1.77 (95% CI, 0.35-8.97) was not statistically significant. In conclusion, the results of this study support those of the majority of previous studies in showing no overall relationship between the use of oral contraceptive agents and the risk of breast cancer.     

2016~2020年北京某地区5879名女性乳腺癌筛查结果分析

目的 探讨近年来适龄健康女性乳腺疾病的发病情况、影响因素及适合我国国情的乳腺癌筛查方法。方法 选择2016～2020年北京某地区5879名女性作为筛查对象,外科临床检查配合专业的彩色B超和乳腺钼靶,并对筛查结果进行统计学分析。结果 5879名女性中,47.28%的女性患有各种乳腺疾病,术后病理证实5例乳腺癌,检出率0.085%。月经初潮时间早、绝经时间晚、乳腺癌家族史等高危因素均会增加乳腺疾病的发病率,且乳腺癌的发病趋于年轻化。结论 针对个体的不同,给予不同的筛查手段,可大规模节约人员和经济成本,使我国适龄女性能更好地从乳腺癌筛查中获益。     

BRCAl基因突变与年轻患者乳腺癌发生的相关性分析

目的 筛查年轻乳腺癌BRCAl基因的突变位点及SNP携带情况,探讨BRCAl基因突变与年轻乳腺癌发生的关系.方法 来自我院2004年1月-2006年8月收集的乳腺癌组织共30例,其中5例有至少1个一级亲属患乳腺癌,发病年龄≤35岁.由乳腺癌组织提取基因组DNA,对BRCAl基因第2、11C、11F、11L、11I、16、20外显子的编码序列进行PCR扩增.扩增产物进行DNA直接测序证实,利用DNA Star-MagAlign软件进行序列比较.结果 BRCAl基因中共发现14个序列变异,有3个移码突变(cDNA2639、2640delTA、3343delG及3398delT)和11个点突变(cDNA 2570 C>T、cDNA2620 A>T、1473A>G、1561C>T、1594G>A、2206A>G、2227T>C、2659C>A、2806T>C、3307A>G、3375G>A),其中3个乳腺癌家族史阳性.突变率为10%(3/30).第16及20外显子未发现突变.结论 BRCAl突变主要位于第11号外显子上,乳腺癌家族史阳性的年轻乳腺癌突变率高,3个移码突变可能与年轻乳腺癌发生相关.     

女性乳腺癌危险因素BRCA1基因突变的观察

目的检测有危险因素者BRCA1第11外显子的突变率。方法38例有危险因素者,年龄29-71岁,有乳腺癌及卵巢癌家族史18例,其中3例本人患乳腺癌;有其他恶性肿瘤家族史者17例;有良性病变者8例,其中1例本人患宫颈癌。25例无危险因素者为对照组。受检者抽取外周血进行DNA提取,经PCR扩增后测序,与NCBI基因库比对。结果1例乳腺良性病变伴宫颈癌者检出4个碱基的缺失突变。危险因素组与对照组另检出6个相同位点的突变,其中5个位点在危险因素组和对照组突变率分别为65.8%和36.0%,两组间存在显著差异（P〈0.05）。结论发生于性器官的恶性肿瘤可能有共同的突变位点,危险因素组突变率显著高于对照组,提示家族性乳腺癌可能与更常见的、低外显率基因变异的综合作用有关。     

Breast cancer in relation to early use of oral contraceptives. No evidence of a latent effect

A long-term effect of oral contraceptives (OCs) on breast cancer risk has been suggested as an explanation for some studies' failure to detect an association between OCs and breast cancer. To address this latency hypothesis, we analyzed data on 4714 case subjects and 4540 control subjects from the population-based Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study. No support was evident for a latent effect of OCs on breast cancer risk through age 54 years: among parous women who had cumulated more than six years of OC use before their first term pregnancy, the risk of breast cancer, relative to nonusers before first term pregnancy, was 0.6 at zero to four years after first term pregnancy (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.2 to 1.8), 0.7 at five to nine years (95% Cl, 0.3 to 1.7), and 1.1 at ten to 14 years (95% Cl, 0.3 to 3.9). Among nulliparous women with more than six years of OC use in total, the relative risk of breast cancer, by interval from last use of OCs, was 1.3 at zero to four years (95% Cl, 0.8 to 2.0), 1.1 at five to nine years (95% Cl, 0.5 to 2.0), and 0.6 at ten to 14 years (95% Cl, 0.1 to 3.7).     

Familial colorectal cancer and the screening of family members

A case-control study was undertaken of the family histories of colorectal cancer in 128 patients with colorectal cancers and those of 61 patients with colorectal adenomas and matched surgical control patients who were attending a regional surgical service in Western Australia. One family with multiple polyposis of the colon was excluded from the study. A history of colorectal cancer in one or more first-degree relatives was associated with a relative risk of colorectal cancer of 2.5 (95% confidence interval, 0.8 to 8.0), of adenoma of 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 8.0) and of any colorectal neoplasm of 2.3 (95% confidence interval, 0.9 to 5.6). Four patients with colorectal cancer and one patient with colorectal adenoma had more than one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer, whereas no control subject gave this history. The five families that were represented by these cases each showed some other features of non-polyposis familial colorectal cancer. It was estimated that familial factors could explain 60% of colorectal cancer in persons with a family history of the disease in a first-degree relative and 5% of colorectal cancer in the population as a whole. Haemoccult II tests were posted to 629 living first-degree relatives of the patients with colorectal cancers and adenomas; 44% of these relatives returned the completed tests. Four relatives with positive results of tests both before and after dietary restriction were investigated; all four subjects had colorectal adenomas. In addition, one subject had a short segment of ulcerative colitis. A further mailing of Haemoccult II tests one year later gave a 39% response rate; no further cases of colorectal neoplasia were found. One relative developed carcinoma of the caecum 10 months after a negative result in the first round of Haemoccult screening. Persons with two or more first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer, with or without other features of non-polyposis familial colorectal cancer, are at a high risk of the development of colorectal cancer. The comparatively-poor response to an offer of Haemoccult II testing and its known insensitivity and lack of specificity suggest that it is not a satisfactory method of screening these high-risk subjects.     

Management of cardiac arrest.

A review of the histories of 1059 patients with breast problems seen consecutively in office consultation revealed an incidence of breast cancer of 13%. Patients over 50 years of age or whose mother or sister had had breast cancer had a substantially greater likelihood of having breast cancer. The finding of the problem on routine examination, a family history of breast cancer in a relative other than the mother or a sister, or prominent breast pain or nipple discharge made the diagnosis of cancer less likely. Menstrual status, a history of previous benign disease, nulliparity, current hormone therapy and duration of symptoms did not help identify the patient likely to have breast cancer. Much time could be saved for both doctor and patient in taking the history from patients with breast disorders. Only the patient's age and the history of the mother and sisters with regard to breast cancer will help identify the "high-risk" patient. Other historical findings are either valueless or should be used to reassure these usually anxious women.     

女性乳腺癌个体危险度评估

目的：建立女性乳腺癌个体危险度评估模型,预测个体乳腺癌发生风险。方法：查阅2009-2011年发表的有关我国女性乳腺癌危险因素的系统评价或大样本的重大项目研究报道,筛选阳性结果变量为研究指标,最终纳入观察的指标包括初潮年龄、初产年龄、流产次数、是否哺乳喂养、绝经年龄、主动/被动吸烟、良性乳腺疾病史、肿瘤家族史、是否服用...     

Risk of breast cancer in women with history of benign disease of the breast

A consecutive series of 791 women who had attended diagnostic breast clinics during 1967-70 and been found to be free of malignant disease were later traced to determine their subsequent incidence of breast cancer. Of the 770 (97%) successfully traced, 22 had developed breast cancer. Based on data from the Welsh Cancer Registry only eight cases of breast cancer had been expected, so that the excess risk for the group was 2.7. The increased risk occurred in all age groups and in women deemed "essentially normal" as well as in those who had had a pathological abnormality. The risk was increased when epithelial hyperplasia was present. No excess mortality from breast cancer was apparent, but follow up was short. More breast symptoms were experienced and more biopsies performed than expected in this group of women. Women with a past history of benign breast disease have a slightly increased risk of breast cancer. Selective screening of these women, however, may be uneconomic and a cause of groundless anxiety.     

Oral contraceptives and breast cancer. A prospective cohort study

In 1976, information on oral contraceptive (OC) use as well as numerous risk factors for breast cancer was provided by 121,964 married female registered nurses aged 30 to 55 years. Ninety-two percent of women in the cohort completed follow-up questionnaires, and vital records were systematically searched to ascertain deaths among nonrespondents. After four years of follow-up, 592 incident cases of breast cancer were identified. Compared with never users, the age-adjusted relative risk (RR) of breast cancer, regardless of menopausal status, among all women who had ever used OCs was 1.0. Among premenopausal women compared with those who had never used OCs, the RR of breast cancer was 1.5 for current use of OCs in 1976 and 1.0 for past use. Among postmenopausal women, the RR for past use of OCs was 1.0. These estimates were essentially unaltered after controlling for other known risk factors for breast cancer in multiple logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, there was no modification of these effects by family history of breast cancer, age at first use, timing of the first birth, or other breast cancer risk factors. Data on past use of OCs provide substantial reassuring evidence that there is no large excess risk of breast cancer within a few years of cessation of pill use. The observed moderate elevation of breast cancer risk with current use was of borderline statistical significance. However, the observation was based on 29 cases and may reflect the effect of sampling variability, as most other studies have not observed a relationship between current use of OCs and breast cancer in women of this age.     

Oral contraceptives and breast cancer: a national study

In a population based case-control study 433 New Zealand women aged 25-54 with newly diagnosed breast cancer were compared with 897 women selected at random from the electoral rolls. The relative risk of breast cancer in women who had ever used oral contraceptives was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.25). The relative risk in women aged 25-34 at diagnosis was estimated to be 2.2 (95% confidence interval 0.47 to 9.9) and in older women less than 1. Analyses of risk by duration of use of oral contraceptives, age at first use, and time since first use showed no adverse effect of the pill. In particular, there was no increased risk in women who had used oral contraceptives before the age of 25 or before their first pregnancy, even for prolonged periods. Given the high prevalence of use in New Zealand, this study provides strong evidence against the hypothesis that use of oral contraceptives at young ages increases the risk of breast cancer.     

Prospective study of relative weight, height, and risk of breast cancer

We examined relative weight and height in relation to subsequent breast cancer risk among 115,534 women 30 to 55 years of age and free from cancer in 1976. By 1984, six hundred fifty-eight premenopausal and 420 postmenopausal breast cancers were documented during 734,716 person-years. Among premenopausal women, risk of breast cancer decreased significantly with increasing relative weight (relative risk for the highest category was 0.6). A similar inverse association was seen for recalled relative weight at 18 years of age. Postmenopausal breast cancer was not associated with relative weight, either recent or at age 18. Height was not associated with breast cancer risk among premenopausal women and only weakly related among postmenopausal women. These data suggest that obesity among premenopausal and early postmenopausal women does not increase breast cancer risk substantially.     

Hereditary aspects of prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To review current literature on the hereditary aspects of prostate cancer and to evaluate the importance of family history in history taking and screening for prostate cancer. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE was searched for articles in English or French published between Jan. 1, 1956, and Oct. 31, 1994, with the use of MeSH headings "prostatic neoplasms," "genetics" and "chromosomes." Additional references were selected from the bibliographies of articles found during the search. STUDY SELECTION: Case-control studies involving the incidence of prostate cancer and relative risk (RR) of such cancer in the families of men with this disease, compared with a control group, were included. Only studies in which prostate cancer was diagnosed on the basis of histologic tests were included. Animal investigations were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Ten case-control studies were evaluated critically in terms of design, case and control groups, the size of the samples and statistical results. The incidence of prostate cancer in the families of cases, compared with that in the families of controls, and differences in RR were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The lifetime risk of prostate cancer is 9.5% and of death from prostate cancer is 2.9% for a man 50 years of age. For first-degree male relatives of men with prostate cancer, the calculated RR ranges from 1.7 to 8.73. "Hereditary" prostate cancer is a term applied to a specific subset of patients with prostate cancer. This form of prostate cancer is transmitted by a rare, autosomal, dominant allele with high penetrance; it accounts for an estimated 43% of early-onset disease (affecting men less than 55 years of age) but only 9% of all prostate cancer in men up to 85 years of age. A greater number of affected family members and early onset among family members are the most significant predictors of risk. CONCLUSIONS: Recent confirmation of the familial clustering and Mendelian inheritance patterns of some prostate cancer has important implications. It increases the potential for directed research into the causes of prostate cancer and for refinements in the current screening practices to detect this common disease. Manoeuvres to detect prostate cancer should be started earlier among men with one or more first-degree relatives with the disease than among other men.     

Breast cancer risk profile used in detecting preclinical disease

Previous studies have identified certain risk factors in breast cancer. Different predictive profiles have been developed to identify women in high risk groups. If the patient's history matches the predictive profile, the patient can be monitored closely. A typical high risk may be Caucasian, aged 35-65 years, have had an early menarche, and have fibrocytsic breasts or sclerosing adenosis. A family history of breast cancer is also importnat. A woman who is childless or who was over age 35 when her 1st child was born is also at high risk. A hypothyroid state, Blood Type A, and a higher socioeconomic class add to the average risk. Mammograms of 11,382 asymptomatic women have shown 4.1/1000 having malignant breast lesions. Thermography and xerography have also been of value. Serum measurements of LDH, uric acid, and protein have helped in predictions. If cancer can be diagnosed before it reaches the clinically palpable size of 1 cm, the prognosis is excellent. Therefore, preclinical detection of a malignant lesion is important.