The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke

Purpose: Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke have received some attention recently, mostly using classical approaches, but there is still an absence of investigation from a modern psychometric perspective. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the WHODAS-II in stroke, using modern psychometric analysis. Methods: A total of 188 community-dwelling poststroke patients were recruited. Internal construct validity was assessed by Rasch analysis, reliability by internal consistency and person separation index (PSI), and external construct validity by associations with Functional Independence Measure (FIM^?). Results: Rasch analysis indicated that total score (based upon 32 items, omitting the work-related items) was satisfactory, after adjustment for local dependency. The proposed “activities” and “participation” components also satisfied Rasch model expectations. An existing short form was problematic due to inclusion of a work-related item, but an alternative 10-item version was acceptable. Cronbach’s α for the WHODAS-II, its domains and components varied between 0.83 and 0.99 and PSI between 0.70 and 0.95. External construct validity was confirmed by expected correlations with FIM^?. Conclusions: WHODAS-II provides a reliable and valid instrument for measuring disability and components of “activities” and “participation” in stroke survivors. Various combinations of the item set may provide a range of scales to suit most research needs.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• The impact of stroke on patients’ functioning in terms of activities and participation is important in the postacute and long-term rehabilitation phase.

• The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) was developed specifically to measure activities and participation.

• Psychometric properties of the WHODAS-II in stroke have received some attention recently, mostly using classical approaches.

• This study has tested the reliability and validity of the WHODAS-II in stroke, using modern psychometric analysis and it has been found that WHODAS-II provides a reliable and valid instrument for measuring functioning and components of “activities” and “participation” in stroke survivors.

     

The psychometric properties of the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire in seven musculoskeletal conditions

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to psychometrically test the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire in seven musculoskeletal conditions.

Materials and methods: One thousand and two hundred people with ankylosing spondylitis; osteoarthritis; systemic lupus erythematosus; systemic sclerosis; chronic pain; chronic upper limb disorders; or Primary Sjögren’s syndrome completed the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire, Health Assessment Questionnaire and Short-Form Health Survey v2. We examined internal construct validity using Rasch analysis, internal consistency, concurrent validity with the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Short-Form Health Survey v2. Participants repeated the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire to assess test–retest reliability.

Results: The 12 domains satisfied Rasch model expectations for fit, local dependency, unidimensionality and invariance by age and gender, in each musculoskeletal condition. Internal consistency was consistent with individual use (Cronbach’s α?>?0.90); concurrent validity was strong (Health Assessment Questionnaire:?r_s?=?0.60–0.92; Short-Form Health Survey v2 Physical Function:?r_s?=??0.61 to ?0.91) and test–retest reliability excellent (Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient(2,1)?=?0.77–0.96).

Conclusion: The Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire satisfied Rasch model requirements for construct validity and has good reliability and validity in each MSC. The Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire can be used as a measure of everyday activity in practice and research with people with musculoskeletal conditions.

• Implications for rehabilitation

• The Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire evaluates users’ ability to perform common daily activities (in 12 domains) that were identified as problematic by people with seven musculoskeletal conditions (i.e., osteoarthritis, systemic lupus, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic pain, chronic upper limb conditions, systemic sclerosis, Sjogren’s syndrome).

• Most patients considered the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire was the right length and would be helpful for discussing everyday problems with an occupational therapist.

• The 12 domains have good reliability and validity and can be combined into two components: Self-Care and Mobility.

• The Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire is suitable for use both in clinical practice and research and a User Manual is available for therapists and researchers.

     

The effect of rater training on scoring performance and scale-specific expertise amongst occupational therapists participating in a multicentre study: a single-group pre–post-test study

Purpose: In order to enhance the quality of the data collected in a multicentre validation study of a revised Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment (MISA), the authors developed a rater training programme. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the training on scoring performance and scale-specific expertise amongst raters. Method: During 2 days of rater training, 81 occupational therapists (OTs) were qualified to observe and score dysphagic clients’ mealtime performance according to the criteria of 36 MISA-items. The training effects were evaluated pre- to post-training using percentage exact agreement (PA) of scored MISA items of a case-vignette and a Likert scale self-report of scale-specific expertise. Results: PA increased significantly from pre- to post-training (Z = ?4.404, p < 0.001), although items for which the case-vignette reflected deficient mealtime performance appeared most difficult to score. The OTs scale-specific expertise improved significantly (knowledge: Z = ?7.857, p < 0.001 and confidence: Z = ?7.838, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Rater training improved OTs scoring performance when using the Danish MISA as well as their perceived scale-specific expertise. Future rater training should emphasis the items identified as those most difficult to score. Additionally, further studies addressing different training approaches and durations are warranted.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• When occupational therapists (OTs) use the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment (MISA) they observe, interpret and record occupational performance of dysphagic clients participating in a meal. This is a highly complex task, which might introduce unwanted variability in measurement scores.

• A 2-day rater training programme was developed and this builds on the findings of several studies. These suggest that combinations of different training methods tend to yield the most effective results.

• Participation in the newly developed training programme on how to administer the MISA significantly reduces unwanted variability in measurement scores and improves OTs’ competency.

• The training programme could be used in undergraduate and postgraduate dysphagia education initiatives to help OTs understanding of the content and the scoring criteria for each aspect of occupational performance during a meal, thus developing observation skills as well as recognizing and avoiding the most common errors in measurement scores.

     

Reliability and responsiveness of measures of pain in people with osteoarthritis of the knee: a psychometric evaluation

Purpose: To examine the fit between data from the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) and the Rasch model, and to explore the reliability and internal responsiveness of measures of pain in people with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: Participants with knee osteoarthritis completed the SF-MPQ-2, Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain questionnaire (ICOAP) and painDETECT. Participants were sent the same questionnaires 3 and 6 months later. Results: Fit to the Rasch model was not achieved for the SF-MPQ-2 Total scale. The Continuous subscale yielded adequate fit statistics after splitting item 10 on uniform DIF for gender, and removing item 9. The Intermittent subscale fit the Rasch model after rescoring items. The Neuropathic subscale had relatively good fit to the model. Test–retest reliability was satisfactory for most scales using both original and Rasch scoring ranging from fair to substantial. Effect sizes ranged from 0.13 to 1.79 indicating good internal responsiveness for most scales. Conclusions: These findings support the use of ICOAP subscales as reliable and responsive measure of pain in people with knee osteoarthritis. The MPQ-SF-2 subscales found to be acceptable alternatives.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The McGill Pain Questionnaire short version 2 is not a unidimensional scale in people with knee osteoarthritis, whereas three of the subscales are unidimensional.

• The McGill Pain Questionnaire short version 2 Affective subscale does not have good measurement properties for people with knee osteoarthritis.

• The McGill Pain Questionnaire short version 2 and the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain scales can be used to assess change over time.

• The painDETECT performs better as a screening measure than as an outcome measure.

     

Measurement properties of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool: a systematic review

Purpose: To systematically review research investigating measurement properties of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART), formerly the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool (HART). Data sources: Seven databases were searched using (i) HART or PC-PART terms and (ii) known authors. Reference list searches, citation searches and author contact were secondary search methods. Study selection: Searches retrieved 492 articles. Those investigating at least one HART or PC-PART measurement property were selected. Three articles met review criteria. Secondary searching produced four additional studies. Data extraction: Two reviewers independently critiqued each article, using published quality criteria for (i) study methods and (ii) each measurement property. Results: There was positive evidence supporting content validity of the PC-PART in adult in-patient and community based, sub/acute health settings. Clinical utility was largely supported. There was inconclusive evidence for inter-rater reliability, construct validity and responsiveness. Conclusions: The PC-PART shows promise as a clinically relevant and useful assessment to aid decision making about admission or discharge from health care settings. Further research is needed to establish the PC-PART’s place in clinical practice across a range of patient groups and settings using sound methods to investigate structural validity, reliability, criterion validity, construct validity, clinical utility and responsiveness.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• The PC-PART was designed to assess patients’ participation restrictions in necessary Personal and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (PADL and IADL) for community living.

• The assessment may aid rehabilitation team decision making about priorities for intervention and readiness for discharge.

• Although there is strong evidence to support content validity, further testing of the PC-PART’s measurement properties is warranted to strengthen evidence to support its use.

     

Rasch validation of the Arabic version of the lower extremity functional scale

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the internal construct validity of the Arabic version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (20-item Arabic LEFS) using Rasch analysis.

Methods: Patients (n?=?170) with lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction were recruited. Rasch analysis of 20-item Arabic LEFS was performed. Once the initial Rasch analysis indicated that the 20-item Arabic LEFS did not fit the Rasch model, follow-up analyses were conducted to improve the fit of the scale to the Rasch measurement model. These modifications included removing misfitting individuals, changing item scoring structure, removing misfitting items, addressing bias caused by response dependency between items and differential item functioning (DIF).

Results: Initial analysis indicated deviation of the 20-item Arabic LEFS from the Rasch model. Disordered thresholds in eight items and response dependency between six items were detected with the scale as a whole did not meet the requirement of unidimensionality. Refinements led to a 15-item Arabic LEFS that demonstrated excellent internal consistency (person separation index [PSI]?=?0.92) and satisfied all the requirement of the Rasch model.

Conclusion: Rasch analysis did not support the 20-item Arabic LEFS as a unidimensional measure of lower extremity function. The refined 15-item Arabic LEFS met all the requirement of the Rasch model and hence is a valid objective measure of lower extremity function. The Rasch-validated 15-item Arabic LEFS needs to be further tested in an independent sample to confirm its fit to the Rasch measurement model.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The validity of the 20-item Arabic Lower Extremity Functional Scale to measure lower extremity function is not supported.

• The 15-item Arabic version of the LEFS is a valid measure of lower extremity function and can be used to quantify lower extremity function in patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

     

The Pediatric Version of the Eating Assessment Tool: a caregiver administered dyphagia-specific outcome instrument for children

Purpose: To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Pediatric version of the caregiver administered Eating Assessment Tool.

Methods: The study included developmental phase and reported content, criterion validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool. Literature review and the original Eating Assessment Tool were used for line-item generation. Expert consensus assessed the items for content validity over two Delphi rounds. Fifty-one healthy children to obtain normative data and 138 children with cerebral palsy to evaluate test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and criterion validity were included. The Penetration-Aspiration Scale was used to assess criterion validity.

Results: All items were found to be necessary. Content validity index was 0.91. The mean score of Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool for healthy children and children with cerebral palsy was 0.26?±?1.83 and 19.5?±?11, respectively. The internal consistency was high with Cronbach’s alpha =0.87 for test and retest. An excellent correlation between the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool and Penetration-Aspiration score for liquid and pudding swallowing was found (p?r?=?0.77; p?r?=?0.83, respectively). A score >4 demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.3% and specificity of 98.8% to predict penetration/aspiration.

Conclusions: The Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool was shown to be a valid and reliable tool to determine penetration/aspiration risk in children.

• Implications for rehabilitation

• The pediatric eating assessment tool: a new dyphagia-specific outcome survey for children.

• The Pediatric Version of the Eating Assessment Tool is a dysphagia specific, parent report outcome instrument to determine penetration/aspiration risk in children.

• The Pediatric Version of the Eating Assessment Tool has good internal consistency, test–retest reliability and criterion-based validity.

• The Pediatric Version of the Eating Assessment Tool may be utilized as a clinical instrument to assess the need for further instrumental evaluation of swallowing function in children.

     

Development and validation of the Diabetes Knowledge Assessment Test for use in medical rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate the Diabetes Knowledge Assessment Test (DKAT), an assessment designed to measure diabetes knowledge of medical rehabilitation patients with or without diabetes. Methods: Content validity methods were used to develop the DKAT, which was administered to rehabilitation patients to examine psychometric properties. Results: Subjects were 75 inpatients (56% with diabetes; 45% male), and 75 outpatients (49% with diabetes; 69% male). The initial DKAT consisted of 49 items, which was reduced to 32 items based on psychometric criteria. Point-biserial item discrimination indices ranged from 0.26 to 0.61. Item difficulty indices ranged from 27 to 96%. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.82. Known groups construct validity comparisons revealed that patients with diabetes obtained significantly higher DKAT scores than patients without diabetes (p?=?0.01), supporting construct validity. Scores did not differ significantly by gender, educational attainment, age, or outpatient versus inpatient (all p?>?0.05), further supporting construct validity. Confirmatory factor analysis identified two factors: “Complications” and “Risks-Symptoms-Management”. Conclusions: Findings support claims that DKAT scores are valid and reliable for diabetes knowledge assessment across a range of rehabilitation conditions. It is appropriate for use with persons with or without diabetes engaging in rehabilitation services as an inpatient or outpatient.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Medical rehabilitation patients represent an important population in which to assess core diabetes knowledge due to the extremely high prevalence of diabetes.

• We were unable to identify instruments with validity evidence aimed at assessing diabetes knowledge in rehabilitation populations, therefore undertook development of the DKAT.

• The DKAT represents a psychometrically promising assessment that can inform individuals at risk with the signs and symptoms of diabetes, as well as behavioral actions to reduce risk.

• The DKAT can also be used to identify those with a diagnosis of diabetes in need of formal diabetes education.

     

The Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment scale: a psychometric analysis from a large multicentre neurorehabilitation dataset

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the internal reliability, construct and concurrent validity and responsiveness of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) scale. Method: A cohort of 2505 neurorehabilitation patients submitted to the UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative database. Cronbach’s coefficient-α was used to assess internal reliability and factor analysis (FA) to assess construct validity. We compared NPTDA scores at admission and discharge to determine responsiveness. Results: Coefficient-α for the whole scale was 0.74. The exploratory FA resulted in a four-factor model (Physical, Psychosocial, Discharge planning and Activities) that accounted for 43% of variance. This model was further supported by the confirmatory FA. The final model had a good fit: root-mean-square error of approximation of 0.069, comparative fit index/Tucker–Lewis index of 0.739/0.701 and the goodness of fit index of 0.909. The NPTDA scores at admission and discharge were significantly different for each of the factors. Expected correlations were seen between the admission scores for the NPTDA, the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale (r?=?0.30, p?<?0.01) and the Functional Independence Measure (r?=??0.25, p?<?0.01). Conclusions: The scale demonstrated acceptable internal reliability and good construct and concurrent validity. NPTDA may be used to describe and quantify changes in therapy inputs in the course of a rehabilitation programme.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) is designed as a measure therapy intervention, which reflects both quantitative and qualitative aspects of the inputs provided (including staff time and the different types of intervention) during inpatient rehabilitation.

• The scale demonstrated acceptable internal reliability and good construct and concurrent validity.

• NPTDA is responsive to change in the therapy inputs provided during neurorehabilitation between admission and discharge.

     

Validity,reliability and ease of use of the disabilities of arm,shoulder and hand questionnaire in adults following stroke

Purpose: The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a patient reported outcome measure for evaluating upper limb function in people with musculoskeletal conditions. While the DASH has good psychometric properties when used with people with musculoskeletal conditions, it has not been tested with adults after stroke.

Methods: Data for n?=?61 adults following stroke (aged 32–93 years, 44% male) were analyzed to test validity and reliability of the DASH for use with a stroke population. Data included demographic and clinical attributes, DASH scores (baseline and four weeks later) and Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) measures.

Results: Internal consistency was good (Cronbach alpha 0.92, SEM 6.65). Factor analysis and Rasch modeling suggested that the questionnaire comprised three subscales: pain, impact and function. Concurrent validity between the DASH and PRWE (Spearman’s Rho r_s?=_?0.41) was moderate. The scale was perceived by clinicians to be useful, quick and simple to administer. The DASH had low four-week test-retest reliability (ICC 0.56 [95% Cl 0.05–0.79]).

Conclusions: The DASH is considered to have acceptable validity when used with adults following stroke. Test–retest reliability was low but further research is needed to establish whether this is a result of condition-related change or the stability of the measure.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The DASH questionnaire examines upper limb function in task performance and appears to be a useful tool, which is simple to administer in the clinical setting with adults following stroke.

• Upper limb function post stroke can be meaningfully assessed using the DASH as it has good internal consistency and moderate concurrent validity.

• Rasch analysis and factor analysis suggests that the tool appears to consist of three subscales: pain, impact and function. The total score of the DASH may be less meaningful than the totals of these subscales.

• The test–retest reliability of the DASH requires further research; over a four-week period DASH stability was poor in a group of people with moderate to severe upper limb impairment.

     

Quality of life for post-polio syndrome: a patient derived,Rasch standard scale

Objective: To design a disease-specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire for people with post-polio syndrome (PPS).

Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 45 people with PPS to identify themes and derive potential items reflecting impact upon QoL. After cognitive debriefing, these were made into a questionnaire pack along with comparative questionnaires and posted to 319 patients. The 271 (85%) returned questionnaires were subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Rasch analysis.

Results: A 25 item scale, the post-polio quality of life scale (PP-QoL), showed good fit to the Rasch model (conditional chi-square p?=?0.156), unidimensionality (% t-tests 2.0: CI 0.7–3.8), and Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87. With the latent estimate transformed to a 0–100 scale, the mean score was 56.9 (SD 18.5) with only 3.3% of respondents at the floor or ceiling of the scale. Test–retest reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2.1) of 0.916, and correlation of 0.85.

Conclusion: The disease-specific PP-QoL demonstrated excellent reliability, appropriate concurrent validity, and satisfied the standards of the Rasch model. It enables examination of the impact of health status upon perceived QoL, and the impact of rehabilitation interventions. The scale is freely available for academic or not-for-profit users to improve research in this neglected, disabling condition.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• In post-polio syndrome (PPS), existing work examines aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), such as activity limitations.

• A disease-specific QoL measure would enable researchers to model the impact of health status, such as fatigue or mobility restrictions, upon QoL in PPS.

• The post-polio quality of life scale (PP-QoL) is based on the patients’ lived experience, meets Rasch standards and is free for use for academic and not-for-profit researchers.

• The raw score is reliable for individual use in clinical settings, and interval scale transformation is available for parametric applications and the calculation of change scores.

     

The Trunk Impairment Scale – modified to ordinal scales in the Norwegian version

Purpose: To translate the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), a measure of trunk control in patients after stroke, into Norwegian (TIS-NV), and to explore its construct validity, internal consistency, intertester and test–retest reliability. Method: TIS was translated according to international guidelines. The validity study was performed on data from 201 patients with acute stroke. Fifty patients with stroke and acquired brain injury were recruited to examine intertester and test–retest reliability. Construct validity was analyzed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory, internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha test, and intertester and test–retest reliability with kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient tests.Results: The back-translated version of TIS-NV was validated by the original developer. The subscale Static sitting balance was removed. By combining items from the subscales Dynamic sitting balance and Coordination, six ordinal superitems (testlets) were constructed. The TIS-NV was renamed the modified TIS-NV (TIS-modNV). After modifications the TIS-modNV fitted well to a locally dependent unidimensional item response theory model. It demonstrated good construct validity, excellent internal consistency, and high intertester and test–retest reliability for the total score.Conclusions: This study supports that the TIS-modNV is a valid and reliable scale for use in clinical practice and research.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• Trunk control is an essential part of balance and postural control, thereby an important prerequisite for daily activities and function

• Impairments of trunk control is a common problem in stroke

• The TIS-modNV is a valid and reliable measure to evaluate impairments in trunk control

• The TIS-modNV containing ordinal superitems is recommended for use in clinical practice and research

     

Translation,cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire

Purpose: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) questionnaire and verify the psychometric properties of the Brazilian–Portuguese version of this instrument.

Methods: Analysis of validity was carried out by applying the Rasch model and evaluating correlations with the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Function (PF) subscale. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were analyzed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC_2,1) and Cronbach’s alpha tests, respectively.

Results: Ninety subjects with various foot and ankle musculoskeletal disorders (age 37.05 SD 10.49 years) were included. The ICC_2,1 was 0.88 and 0.82 with Cronbach’s alphas of 0.93 and 0.90 for the “Activities of Daily Living” (ADL) and “Sports” subscales, respectively. Correlations with the SF-36 PF were 0.78 (p?95: 0.62–0.87) and 0.65 (p?95: 0.45–0.79) for the ADL and Sports subscales, respectively. Item reliability indices in Rasch analysis were 0.91 (ADL) and 0.84 (Sports). Three items from the ADL subscale (14.2%) did not match the expectations of the model. All items from the Sports subscale fit the model.

Conclusions: There is evidence of validity and reliability of the FAAM-Brazil. Rasch analysis indicated that three items of the ADL subscale did not fit the model in the sample studied.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Self-report questionnaires are commonly used in both clinical practice and research because of their ability to efficiently collect information. If the instrument is created properly, the information collected can be used to interpret the effect of clinical conditions on physical function.

• The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is an evaluative instrument that assesses functional limitations for those with foot- and ankle-related disorders. It was translated into four languages and has evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness.

• Evidence of validity and reliability is provided for the FAAM-Brazil when applied to subjects with a wide range of foot and ankle musculoskeletal disorders.

     

Validity of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) for measuring the mobility of patients with hip fracture during rehabilitation

Purpose: Many patients suffer long term loss of mobility after hip fracture but there is no gold standard method for measuring mobility in this group. We aimed to validate a new mobility outcome measure, the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) in a hip fracture population during inpatient rehabilitation. Method: The DEMMI was compared with the existing measures of activity limitation: 6 minute walk test, 6 metre walk test and Barthel Index on 109 consecutive patients admitted to rehabilitation after surgery for hip fracture. Patients were assessed by a physiotherapist at admission and discharge. Scale width, validity, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), responsiveness, and unidimensionality were investigated. Results: Evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity were obtained for the DEMMI. Responsiveness was similar across instruments and the MCIDs were consistent with previous reports. A floor effect was identified for the 6 metre walk test and 6 minute walk test at hospital admission. Rasch analysis identified that the DEMMI maintains its unidimensional properties in this population. Conclusions: The DEMMI has a broader scale width than existing measures of activity limitation and provides a unidimensional measure of mobility for hip fracture patients during inpatient rehabilitation.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• Loss of mobility is a common and significant problem following hip fracture.

• The de Morton Mobilitiy Index (DEMMI) is an effective instrument for measuring mobility in patients with hip fracture during rehabilitation

• The DEMMI is unidimensional, has a broader scale width than existing measures and offers an interval scale for measurement of mobility in hip fracture during rehabilitation

     

Psychometric properties of the performing arts module of the Disabilities of the Arm,Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire

Abstract

Background: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) offers an optional performing arts module. The goal was to examine the psychometric properties of this module in musicians.

Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of a biopsychosocial intervention to prevent or reduce playing-related disability in conservatory students. Baseline data were used to examine internal consistency and discriminative validity of the performing arts module of the DASH questionnaire. Construct validity was analyzed by hypotheses testing. The performing arts module outcomes were compared to scores from the general DASH questionnaire, pain disability index, Short-Form 36, playing-related musculoskeletal disorder (PRMD) intensity, and pain intensity.

Results: Questionnaires completed by 130 conservatory students were analyzed, 55% of the population was female. Median age was 20 years (IQR 4). The performing arts module showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.893). Discriminative validity between students with and without PRMDs was good. Three out of six hypotheses were accepted, indicating moderate construct validity.

Conclusions: The performing arts module showed good internal consistency, good discriminative validity and moderate construct validity in a population of conservatory students.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Musicians suffer frequently from musculoskeletal disorders, mostly in the upper extremity.

• The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire is a well-known outcome measure, which also includes a performing arts module.

• This study is the first to explore psychometric properties of the performing arts module.

• The performing arts module of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire showed good internal consistency, good discriminative validity, and moderate construct validity.

     

Further validation of the Multiple Sclerosis Self-Efficacy Scale

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the factorial and construct validity of the Multiple Sclerosis Self-Efficacy (MSSE) Scale in two samples of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Method: Two samples (n's?=?292, 275) of participants with MS were recruited from across the United States. Participants in both studies completed a questionnaire battery that included the MSSE and measures of symptoms, dysfunction, disability, psychosocial aspects, mental/emotional well-being, and quality of life. Factorial validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), whereas construct validity was examined based on bivariate correlations with scores from other measures. Results: The two-factor measurement model provided a poor fit for the 18 items on the MSSE in both the samples. This model provided a good fit for a modified, 10-item scale in both samples. The 10-item version of the MSSE was highly correlated with the original MSSE (r?=?0.97, p?<?0.001) and related constructs (e.g. disability, r?=?0.69, p?<?0.0001). The standardized Cronbach's αs of the two subscales (function and control) of the 10-item version ranged between 0.78 and 0.94 for both samples. Conclusions: Scores from the modified, 10-item version of the MSSE provide a valid and reliable measure of MS-specific self-efficacy among persons with MS.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The importance of self-efficacy in managing the consequences of multiple sclerosis (MS) has increased.

• The Multiple Sclerosis Self-Efficacy (MSSE) Scale was developed and validated for measuring self-efficacy in function maintenance and control over MS from patients' perspectives. In the past almost 20 years, this scale has not undergone additional validation of its factor structure and construct validity in large-scale samples of persons with MS.

• The original two-factor construct did not provide a good fit for the 18 items on the MSSE in two independent samples. We modified the MSSE and found the 10 items fitted by the two-factor construct well with one sample and demonstrated cross-validity of the 10 items in the second sample.

• The 10-item version of the MSSE has good reliability and construct validity in both independent samples. Researchers and clinicians should adopt these 10 items when examining MS self-efficacy of patients.

     

An exploration of the relationship between two measures of children’s participation

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between the Children Participation Questionnaire and the Children’s Assessment of Participation with Hands.

Materials and methods: Two researchers classified the item contents independently using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Child and Youth version as a guide. Parents of 51 children with intellectual and developmental disabilities completed both measures within one month.

Results: The linking results indicated that the two participation measures covered a broad range of life domains, which corresponded well to the conceptually matched Activities and Participation categories/chapters of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Child and Youth version. A significant moderate link (Spearman’s ρ coefficient?=?0.68, p?ρ?=?0.47–0.71, p?Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the content and construct validity of the two children’s participation measures. The findings also offer important insights about the similarities and differences between the two measures. This knowledge will assist clinicians in selecting outcome measures.

• Implications for rehabilitation

• The Children Participation Questionnaire and Children’s Assessment of Participation with Hands demonstrate good content and convergent validity.

• The two measures capture distinctive aspects and/or degrees of children’s participation.

• Clinicians and researchers need to be aware of the similarities and differences between the two measures before selecting outcome measure.

     

Environmental needs and facilitators available for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: adaptation and validation of the European Child Environment Questionnaire (ECEQ) Spanish version

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study is to present the process of translating, adapting and validating the European Child Environment Questionnaire (ECEQ) in the Spanish context. Method: The participants were 200 parents of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP) aged 8–18 years, from seven regions in Spain. The adaptation of the ECEQ original version was carried out through the translation and back translation into Spanish. Construct validity was assessed by Factor analysis, Rasch model, and analysing group differences in need and availability of environmental features (EFs) according to level GMFCS. Results: We obtained a high rate of parental response. The ECEQ Spanish version contains 59 items and we identified four domains: Products and technology – home, school and community – services, systems and policies, support and relations, and Attitudes. Seventeen items were dropped as they did not fit well into plausible domains. Construct validity in terms of distinguishing between groups with expected for both need and availability. Conclusion: The ECEQ Spanish version was more appropriate to assess the needs of and access to EFs in the following domains: Products and technology and services, systems and policies, and it proved less appropriate for the support and relations, and attitudes domains.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Identification of barriers and environmental facilitators are key aspects to ensure the participation of children and adolescents with CP.

• The ECEQ is a useful tool for identifying needs and availability of the environmental features for children and adolescents with CP in Spain.

• This tool contains 59 items that are consistent with ICF framework.

• The Spanish version of ECEQ provides valuable information, which could be helpful to guide public services and organization services in order to optimize participation of children and adolescents with CP.