The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity,reliability, and responsiveness

Background

In response for the need of a freely available, stand‐alone, validated outcome measure for use within musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy practice, sensitive enough to measure clinical effectiveness, we developed an MSK patient reported outcome measure.

Objectives

This study examined the validity and reliability of the newly developed Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM) within physiotherapy outpatient settings.

Methods

Two hundred twenty‐four patients attending physiotherapy outpatient departments in South East England with an MSK condition participated in this study. The BmPROM was assessed for user friendliness (rated feedback, N = 224), reliability (internal consistency and test–retest reliability, n = 42), validity (internal and external construct validity, N = 224), and responsiveness (internal, n = 25).

Results

Exploratory factor analysis indicated that a two‐factor model provides a good fit to the data. Factors were representative of “Functionality” and “Wellbeing”. Correlations observed between the BmPROM and SF‐36 domains provided evidence of convergent validity. Reliability results indicated that both subscales were internally consistent with alphas above the acceptable limits for both “Functionality” (α = .85, 95% CI [.81, .88]) and ‘Wellbeing’ (α = .80, 95% CI [.75, .84]). Test–retest analyses (n = 42) demonstrated a high degree of reliability between “Functionality” (ICC = .84; 95% CI [.72, .91]) and “Wellbeing” scores (ICC = .84; 95% CI [.72, .91]). Further examination of test–retest reliability through the Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that the difference between “Functionality” and “Wellbeing” test scores did not vary as a function of absolute test score. Large treatment effect sizes were found for both subscales (Functionality d = 1.10; Wellbeing 1.03).

Conclusion

The BmPROM is a reliable and valid outcome measure for use in evaluating physiotherapy treatment of MSK conditions.     

Rehabilitation Practitioners' Prioritized Care Processes in Hip Fracture Post-Acute Care

Aims: Occupational and physical therapy in post-acute care (PAC) has reached the point where quality indicators for hip fracture are needed. This study characterizes the practitioners' prioritized hip fracture rehabilitation practices, which can guide future quality improvement initiatives. Methods: Ninety-two practitioners participating in a parent mixed methods study were asked to rank a series of evidence-based best practices across five clinical domains (assessment, intervention, discharge planning, caregiver training, and patient education). Results: Prioritized practices reflected patient–practitioner collaboration, facilitating an effective discharge, and preventing adverse events. The highest endorsed care processes include: developing meaningful goals with patient input (84%) in assessment, using assistive devices in intervention (75%) and patient education (65%), engaging the patient and caregiver (50%) in discharge planning, and fall prevention (60%) in caregiver education. Conclusions: Practitioners identified key care priorities. This study lays the foundation for future work evaluating the extent to which these practices are delivered in PAC.     

High Frequency: Treatment Priority Nursing Diagnoses in Critical Care

The purpose of this study was to identify high frequency-treatment priority nursing diagnoses in critical care nursing using survey research methods. Through a mailed survey the prevalence of 135 nursing diagnoses from the NANDA Diagnostic Taxonomy and other diagnoses was rated by a national, random sample of 678 critical care nurses. Six important diagnostic areas were: sleep-rest, activity, nutritional-metabolic, cognitive-perceptual, self-perception (mood state), and health management (risk) patterns. Twenty diagnoses were rated as nearly always or frequently present in their practice by 70% or more of the nurses. Findings can be used to focus clinical studies of the highly prevalent diagnoses.     

Introducing Critical Care Outreach: a ward-randomised trial of phased introduction in a general hospital

Objective The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of introducing a critical care outreach service on in-hospital mortality and length of stay in a general acute hospital.Design A pragmatic ward-randomised trial design was used, with intervention introduced to all wards in sequence. No blinding was possible.Setting Sixteen adult wards in an 800-bed general hospital in the north of England.Patients and participants All admissions to the 16 surgical, medical and elderly care wards during 32-week study period were included (7450 patients in total, of whom 2903 were eligible for the primary comparison).Interventions Essential elements of the Critical Care Outreach service introduced during the study were a nurse-led team of nurses and doctors experienced in critical care, a 24-h service, emphasis on education, support and practical help for ward staff.Measurements and results The main outcome measures were in-hospital mortality and length of stay. Outreach intervention reduced in-hospital mortality compared with control (two-level odds ratio: 0.52 (95% CI 0.32–0.85). A possible increased length of stay associated with outreach was not fully supported by confirmatory and sensitivity analyses.Conclusions The study suggests outreach reduces mortality in general hospital wards. It may also increase length of stay, but our findings on this are equivocal.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at An editorial regarding this article can be found in the same issue ()     

Rehabilitation content and clinical stroke subtype: a small observational study

Purpose. The Oxford classification categorises stroke according to clinical features. Differences in terms of mortality, institutionalisation, recurrence and achievement of mobility milestones have been demonstrated across clinical subtypes. This study aimed to describe differences in content of occupational therapy and physiotherapy activities, according to clinical stroke subtype.

Method. This retrospective study forms part of a larger research project (n = 419). Ten patients from each of five clinical subtypes were randomly selected and therapy content was recoded from the medical notes using a coding tool.

Results. The content of therapy sessions varied across subtypes, for both occupational therapy and physiotherapy sessions. Kruskal–Wallis analysis showed significant difference between subtypes for passive movements and transfers (p < 0.05) and standing balance, walking and stairs (p < 0.01). Similarly, significant differences between subtypes were seen in personal activities of daily living and the assessment or treatment of mood/cognitive problems (p < 0.05).

Conclusions. The results show differences in the content of occupational and physiotherapy sessions across clinical stroke subtypes. Findings from this study could be used to help workforce planning and inform future studies with a larger sample.     

Functional independence measure scores predict level of long-term care required by patients after stroke: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Purpose: To examine whether Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores on admission can predict the future care levels of patients after acute stroke. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we enrolled post-acute stroke patients and assessed stroke subtypes, self-care abilities using FIM scores, and discharge destination. Patients’ care levels were assessed according to the Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) system (0–5: slight impairment to bedridden), the national insurance plan for care in Japan, at discharge. We divided patients into two groups according to LTCI care levels (0–2 versus 3–5) to compare their clinical characteristics using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The trial was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000012653). Results: Of the 1261 patients (47% female, mean age 75 years), 492 (39%) fulfilled LTCI care levels 0–2. FIM scores on admission were significantly correlated with LTCI care levels (p?<?0.001). On multivariate analysis, age and FIM scores on admission were found to be independent predictors of LTCI care levels 0–2. Conclusions: FIM scores on admission after stroke can independently predict later care requirements. Early prediction of LTCI care levels may contribute to the early supported discharge and improve the efficiency of healthcare planning.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• There is a clear relationship between Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and the care levels certified by the Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) system, a national healthcare and insurance system in Japan.

• FIM scores on admission can predict future LTCI care levels required for patients after acute stroke.

• Early prediction of LTCI care levels may contribute to early supported discharge, improve the efficiency of stroke management and assist healthcare planning.

     

The Critical Care Research Network: a partnership in community-based research and research transfer

The objectives of this study were to present a short history of the Critical Care Research Network (CCR‐Net), describe its approach to health services research and to summarize completed and current research projects. In doing this, we explored the question is this research network accomplishing its goals? We reviewed the medical literature to identify studies on similar types of Networks and also the evidence supporting the methodology used by CCR‐Net to conduct research using MEDLINE, HEALTHSTAR, CINAHL and the keywords network and health care or healthcare, benchmarking and health care or healthcare, and research transfer or research utilization. We also reviewed the bibliographies of retrieved articles and our personal files. In addition, we summarized the results of studies conducted by CCR‐Net and outlined those currently in progress. A review of the literature identified studies on two similar networks that appeared to be succeeding. In addition, the literature was also supportive of the general process used by CCR‐Net, although the level of evidence varied. Finally, the studies conducted to date within CCR‐Net follow the suggested methodology. At the time of this preliminary communication CCR‐Net appears to have adopted a valid approach to health services research within the area of Critical Care Medicine. Further direct evidence is required and appropriate studies are planned.     

Critical Care in the Emergency Department A Physiologic Assessment and Outcome Evaluation

OBJECTIVES: The changing landscape of health care in this country has seen an increase in the delivery of care to critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED). However, methodologies to assess care and outcomes similar to those used in the intensive care unit (ICU) are currently lacking in this setting. This study examined the impact of ED intervention on morbidity and mortality using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), and the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS). METHODS: This was a prospective, observational cohort study over a three-month period. Critically ill adult patients presenting to a large urban ED and requiring ICU admission were enrolled. APACHE II, SAPS II, and MODS scores and predicted mortality were obtained at ED admission, ED discharge, and 24, 48, and 72 hours in the ICU. In-hospital mortality was recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients aged 64 +/- 18 years were enrolled during the study period, with a 30.9% in-hospital mortality. The ED length of stay was 5.9 +/- 2.7 hours and the hospital length of stay was 12.2 +/- 16.6 days. Nine (11.1%) patients initially accepted for ICU admission were later admitted to the general ward after ED intervention. Septic shock was the predominant admitting diagnosis. At ED admission, there was a significantly higher APACHE II score in nonsurvivors (23.0 +/- 6.0) vs survivors (19.8 +/- 6.5, p = 0.04), while there was no significant difference in SAPS II or MODS scores. The APACHE II, SAPS II, and MODS scores were significantly lower in survivors than nonsurvivors throughout the hospital stay (p 相似文献