Systematic Review of Instrumented Measures of Skeletal Muscle Mechanical Properties: Evidence for the Application of Shear Wave Elastography with Children

The aim of this review was to identify instrumented devices that quantify skeletal muscle mechanical properties and to evaluate their potential clinical utility and clinimetric evidence with respect to children. Four databases were searched to identify articles reporting original clinimetric data for devices measuring muscle stiffness or elastic modulus, along a muscle's main fibre direction. Clinimetric evidence was rated using the Consensus-Based Standard for the Selection of Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Sixty-five articles provided clinimetric data for two devices meeting our criteria: the Aixplorer and the Acuson. Both are shear wave elastography devices that determine the shear modulus of muscle tissue. The Aixplorer had strong construct validity and reliability, and the Acuson, moderate construct validity and reliability. Both devices have sound clinical utility with non-invasive application at various joint positions and data acquisition in real time, minimizing fatigue. Further research is warranted to evaluate utility for children with specific disorders of abnormal muscle structure or function.     

Psychometric properties of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists: a systematic review

ObjectiveEvidence suggests that care providers' attitudes influence their perception of patient characteristics and the way they manage their cases. Attitudes and beliefs of care providers can be measured with the Pain Attitude and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT). This study evaluates the measurement properties of the PABS-PT.MethodsDatabases (PubMed-Medline, Embase, Cinahl and Pedro) were searched for studies on the development or evaluation of measurement properties of the PABS-PT. Methodological quality was assessed and rated using the COSMIN checklist and scoring system.ResultsOf the 139 identified publications, 10 met the selection criteria. Most of the included studies had fair to excellent methodological quality scores. Positive results were found for internal consistency, construct validity, reliability and responsiveness. No psychometric data were found for the content validity and interpretability of the PABS-PT.ConclusionThe PABS-PT is still in a developmental stage. Results for the psychometric properties are promising, but content validity and interpretability need more study. The relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes, and their influence on test scores, remains unclear.     

A NOVEL TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINING SCAPULOHUMERAL TRANSLATION: A CASE-CONTROL AND INTER-RATER RELIABILITY STUDY

Background:

Alterations in scapular and glenohumeral kinematics in patients with shoulder dysfunction have been recognized by this studies authors'' and described in multiple other studies available in the literature. A reliability study was developed to assess a new technique for measuring scapulohumeral kinematics. Previous scapular position measuring techniques may require expensive equipment which decreases clinical utility. Other techniques require identification of multiple anatomic landmarks that may decrease accuracy, precision, and reliability.

Methods:

A sample of asymptomatic controls and symptomatic study subjects were recruited. Each subject had markers placed on each acromion and stood at a standardized distance in front of a light. The shadow projected from the acromial marker onto a standardized, data collection board was measured during the resting, flexion, and scaption positions for bilateral shoulders. The horizontal and vertical translations of the shadows were measured compared to the resting point for both flexion and scaption.

Results:

The scapula translated superiorly and medially during both flexion and scaption movements in all subjects and controls. There was good inter-rater reliability for measuring scapular translation with scaption (ICC= 0.81) and moderate reliability for measuring scapular translation with flexion (ICC = 0.62). There was increased superior and medial scapular translation in the subjects with flexion (p= 0.004 and p=0.002) and scaption (p= 0.01 and p=0.007) in the symptomatic shoulder compared to the asymptomatic shoulder. Superior scapular translation with flexion (p=0.0003) and scaption (p=0.006) and medial scapular translation with flexion (p<0.0001) and scaption (p<0.0001) was greater in the symptomatic subjects compared to controls.

Conclusions:

The scapula translates both superiorly and medially with flexion and scaption in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. After shoulder surgery, patients have increased superior and medial translation of the scapula compared to 1) their asymptomatic shoulder and 2) an asymptomatic control group. The current technique has good inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.81) when measuring scaption and moderate reliability when measuring flexion (ICC=0.62).

Level of Evidence:

III Diagnostic Case-Control Study     

A systematic review of healthcare professionals' core competency instruments

While technical and profession‐specific competencies are paramount in the delivery of healthcare services, the cross‐cutting core competencies of healthcare professionals play an important role in healthcare transformation, innovation, and the integration of roles. This systematic review describes the characteristics and psychometric properties of existing instruments for assessing healthcare professionals' core competencies in clinical settings. It was guided by the JBI methodology and used the COSMIN checklist (Mokkink et al., User manual, 2018, 78, 1) to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. A database search (CINAHL, Scopus, and PubMed) and additional manual search were undertaken for peer‐reviewed papers with abstracts, published in English between 2008 and 2019. The search identified nine studies that were included in the synthesis demonstrating core competencies in professionalism, ethical and legal issues, research and evidence‐based practice, personal and professional development, teamwork and collaboration, leadership and management, and patient‐centered care. Few instruments addressed competencies in quality improvement, safety, communication, or health information technology. The findings demonstrate the reviewed tools' validity and reliability and pave the way for a comprehensive evaluation and assessment of core competencies into clinical practice.     

Reliability,validity, and responsiveness of the Persian version of Shoulder Activity Scale in a group of patients with shoulder disorders

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this methodological study was to cross-culturally translate the Shoulder Activity Scale (SAS) into the Persian and determine its clinimetric properties including reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with shoulder disorders. Method: Persian version of the SAS was obtained after standard forward-backward translation. Three questionnaires were completed by the respondents: SAS, shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), and Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). The patients completed the SAS, 1 week after the first visit to evaluate the test–retest reliability. Construct validity was evaluated by examining the associations between the scores on the SAS and the scores obtained from the SPADI, SF-36, and age of the patients. To assess responsiveness, data were collected in the first visit and then again after 4 weeks physiotherapy intervention. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed using Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. To evaluate construct validity, Spearman’s rank correlation was used. The ability of the SAS to detect changes was evaluated by the receiver-operating characteristics method. Results: No problem or language difficulties were reported during translation process. Test–retest reliability of the SAS was excellent with an ICC of 0.98. Also, the marginal Cronbach’s alpha level of 0.64 was obtained. The correlation between the SAS and the SPADI was low, proving divergent validity, whereas the correlations between the SAS and the SF-36/age were moderate proving convergent validity. A marginally acceptable responsiveness was achieved for the Persian SAS. Conclusions: The study provides some evidences to support the test–retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness of the Persian version of the SAS in patients with shoulder disorders. Therefore, it seems that this instrument is a useful measure of shoulder activity level in research setting and clinical practice.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The shoulder activity scale (SAS) is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of shoulder activity level in Persian-speaking patients with different shoulder disorders.

• The results on clinimetric properties of the Persian SAS are comparable with its original, English version.

• Persian version of the SAS can be used in “clinical” and “research” settings of patients with shoulder disorders.

     

Quality Assessment of Neonatal Pain Scales Translated and Validated to Brazilian Portuguese: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties

ObjectivesThe objective of this systematic review was to identify and describe the psychometric properties of neonatal pain scales that were translated into Brazilian Portuguese and to verify the methodological quality of these translation, transcultural adaptations and validation.DesignThe present study is a systematic review. A systematic search in the literature included studies of development, validation, and transcultural adaptation of neonatal pain scales to Brazilian Portuguese. The instruments must have been developed for health care professionals to evaluate neonatal pain and stress in full-term and preterm newborns.Data SourcesThe search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Scielo databases following The PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses).Review /Analysis MethodsA total of 1,479 publications were identified and 5 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, with 4 instruments evaluated. For the methodological quality analysis of the measurement properties of the instruments the Consensus-based Standards for Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias checklist was used. The psychometric properties verified were internal consistency, content validity, reliability, and construct validity.ResultsThree instruments reviewed were inadequate and one was doubtful.ConclusionsThe neonatal pain scales wich were cross culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese were shown to be of low methodological quality based on COSMIM checklist. Caution should be considered for clinical decisions about pain management judgment coming from these instruments.     

中文版高血压患者服药依从性量表测量学特性的系统评价

目的 系统评价中文版高血压患者服药依从性量表的测量学特性及研究的方法学质量,为医护人员选择高质量的量表提供循证依据。方法 系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网、维普数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库中与高血压患者服药依从性量表测量学特性评价相关的研究,检索时限为建库至2022年2月3日。按照健康测量工具遴选标准（consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments,COSMIN）要求,由2名研究者独立进行文献筛选和资料提取,采用COSMIN偏倚风险清单及质量标准评定量表测量学特性并形成最终推荐意见。结果 共纳入10项研究,涉及9个中文版高血压患者服药依从性量表,均未报告跨文化效度、测量误差、假设检验、反应度。因内容效度均为不充分或不确定,证据质量为中等或以下,最终9个量表均为B级推荐。结论 与其他8个量表相比,服药依从性自我效能量表修订版的测量学特性评价最为均衡,具有较好的信效度,但该量表的其他测量学特性仍有待验证。     

Seeing the gaps: a systematic review of visual perception tools for children with hemiplegia

Purpose.?Visual perception difficulties are common in children with cerebral palsy – hemiplegia, however it is not known which assessment tool is the best for this population. This systematic review evaluates the clinimetric properties of visual perception assessments for children with hemiplegia.

Method.?Databases were searched for assessments that: (i) measured visual perception; (ii) were reported in studies with children with hemiplegia and (iii) had clinimetric data available to assessors.

Results.?Three assessments met criteria: the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills (TVPS), Motor-Free Visual Perceptual Test (MVPT) and Developmental Test of Visual Perception (DTVP). Factor analysis has been completed for the TVPS and DTVP, with both assessments and especially the TVPS, demonstrating some subtests that do not load significantly for the first factor of motor-free visual perception. All three assessments demonstrate variable construct and criterion validity with other clinical assessments. The DTVP, MVPT and TVPS demonstrate high test-retest reliability for total scores, but individual TVPS subtests are less reliable.

Conclusions.?The MVPT and DTVP show the best clinimetric data, however, less research has been completed on these tests than the TVPS. Further research is required to confirm the validity and reliability of the MVPT and DTVP for children with hemiplegia.     

Methodological quality of studies on the measurement properties of neck pain and disability questionnaires: a systematic review

Objective

The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the methodological quality of studies on the measurement properties of neck pain and disability questionnaires and to describe how well various aspects of the design and statistical analyses of studies on measurement properties are performed.

Methods

A systematic review was performed of published studies on the measurement properties of neck pain and disability questionnaires. Two reviewers independently rated the quality of the studies using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. This checklist was developed in an international Delphi consensus study.

Results

A total of 47 articles were included on the measurement properties of 8 different questionnaires. The methodological quality of the included studies was adequate on some aspects (often, adequate statistical analyses are used for assessing reliability, measurement error, and construct validity) but can be improved on other aspects. The most important methodological aspects that need to be improved are as follows: assessing unidimensionality in internal consistency analysis, stable patients and similar test conditions in studies on reliability and measurement error, and more emphasis on the relevance and comprehensiveness of the items in content validity studies. Furthermore, it is recommended that studies on construct validity and responsiveness should be based on predefined hypotheses and that better statistical methods should be used in responsiveness studies.

Conclusion

Considering the importance of adequate measurement properties, it is concluded that, in the field of measuring neck pain and disability, there is room for improvement in the methodological quality of studies measurement properties.     

Walking tests for stroke survivors: a systematic review of their measurement properties

Purpose: To provide an overview of walking tests including their measurement properties that have been used in stroke survivors. Method: Electronic databases were searched using specific search strategies. Retrieved studies were selected by using specified inclusion criteria. A modified consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist was applied for methodological quality assessment of the included studies. A quality assessment for statistical outcomes was used to assess measurement properties of the walking tests. Tests that were included were categorized according to the framework of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Results: Thirty-two studies, evaluating 23 walking tests, were included. The tests assessed walking using the outcome measures of walking speed, walking distance, functional ambulation and walking on different surfaces. The methodological design and statistical methods of most studies evaluating reliability and criterion validity were sufficient, and found the outcome measures to be reliable and valid. However, data on measurement error, minimal important difference and minimal important change were lacking and responsiveness was correctly evaluated in one study only. Conclusions: Many walking tests have been clinimetrically evaluated in stroke survivors. Most walking tests were found to be reliable and valid.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• Many tests assessing walking in stroke survivors are available in the literature. The Six Minute Walk Test, Ten Metre Comfortable Walk Test, Ten Metre Fast Walk Test, Functional Ambulation Categories and Six Metre Walk Test on parquet and carpet have been most frequently clinimetrically evaluated. These tests amongst others, have been shown to be valid, reliable and feasible for stroke survivors.

• With the wide variety of walking tests, it is important to choose an appropriate walking test suiting the specific aim of the clinician or researcher.

     

THE ROLE OF THE SCAPULA

Previously, the scapular musculature was often neglected in designing a rehabilitation protocol for the shoulder. In the past two decades a significant amount of research has been performed in order to help identify the role of the scapula in upper extremity function. Weakness of the scapular stabilizers and resultant altered biomechanics could result in: 1) abnormal stresses to the anterior capsular structures of the shoulder, 2) increased possibility of rotator cuff compression, and 3) decreased shoulder complex neuromuscular performance. This clinical commentary presents facts about the anatomy and biomechanics of the scapula and surrounding musculature, and describes the pathomechanics of scapular dysfunction. The focus is upon the assessment of dysfunction and retraining of the scapular musculature.

Level of Evidence:

5     

VALIDATION OF A NEW METHOD FOR ASSESSING SCAPULAR ANTERIOR‐POSTERIOR TILT

Background:

Electromagnetic tracking systems have enabled some investigators and clinicians to measure tri‐planar scapular motion; yet, they are not practical and affordable options for all clinicians. Currently, the ability to affordably quantify scapular motion is limited to monitoring only the motion of scapular upward rotation, with use of a digital inclinometer.

Hypothesis/Purpose:

The objective of this study was to determine the criterion‐related validity of a modified digital inclinometer when used to measure the motion of scapular anterior‐posterior (AP) tilt.

Materials & Methods:

Thirteen volunteers, free from any history of shoulder injury, reported for a single testing session. Each subject underwent a brief shoulder and posture examination in order to confirm the absence of pathology. Subjects actively performed clinically relevant amounts of humeral elevation in the scapular plane while in a seated position. An electromagnetic tracking system (Ascension Technology, Burlington, VT) and a modified inclinometer (Pro 360, Baseline®, Fabrication Enterprises, White Plains, NY) were used to acquire scapular AP tilt over the same shoulder motions. Criterion‐related validity was determined using Pearson Product Moment correlations.

Results:

Correlation analyses revealed significant moderate to good associations (r = 0.63 to 0.86, p < 0.01) between scapular AP tilt measures obtained with a digital inclinometer and an electromagnetic tracking system.

Conclusions

A modified digital inclinometer is a moderately valid device to use for the quantification of scapular AP tilt. Further study is warranted to establish reliability and to validate use of the device in patients with shoulder injury or pathology. The modified inclinometer expands the clinician''s ability to quantify scapular kinematic motion during the clinical evaluation and rehabilitation process.

Level of Evidence:

Level 3     

Validity and reliability of a novel measure of activity performance and participation

Purpose: To develop and evaluate an innovative clinician-rated measure, which produces global numerical ratings of activity performance and participation. Method: Repeated measures study with 48 community-dwelling participants investigating clinical sensibility, comprehensiveness, practicality, inter-rater reliability, responsiveness, sensitivity and concurrent validity with Barthel Index. Results: Important clinimetric characteristics including comprehensiveness and ease of use were rated >8/10 by clinicians. Inter-rater reliability was excellent on the summary scores (intraclass correlation of 0.95–0.98). There was good evidence that the new outcome measure distinguished between known high and low functional scoring groups, including both responsiveness to change and sensitivity at the same time point in numerous tests. Concurrent validity with the Barthel Index was fair to high (Spearman Rank Order Correlation 0.32–0.85, p?>?0.05). The new measure’s summary scores were nearly twice as responsive to change compared with the Barthel Index. Other more detailed data could also be generated by the new measure. Conclusions: The Activity Performance Measure is an innovative outcome instrument that showed good clinimetric qualities in this initial study. Some of the results were strong, given the sample size, and further trial and evaluation is appropriate.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• The Activity Performance Measure is an innovative outcome measure covering activity performance and participation.

• In an initial evaluation, it showed good clinimetric qualities including responsiveness to change, sensitivity, practicality, clinical sensibility, item coverage, inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity with the Barthel Index.

• Further trial and evaluation is appropriate.

     

Self-management: a systematic review of outcome measures adopted in self-management interventions for stroke

Purpose: To systematically review the psychometric properties of outcome measures used in stroke self-management interventions (SMIs) to (1) inform researchers, clinicians and commissioners about the properties of the measures in use and (2) make recommendations for the future development of self-management measurement in stroke. Methods: Electronic databases, government websites, generic internet search engines and hand searches of reference lists. Abstracts were selected against inclusion criteria and retrieved for appraisal and systematically scored, using the COSMIN checklist. Results: Thirteen studies of stroke self-management originating from six countries were identified. Forty-three different measures (mean 5.08/study, SD 2.19) were adopted to evaluate self-SMIs. No studies measured self-management as a discreet concept. Six (46%) studies included untested measures. Eleven (85%) studies included at least one measure without reported reliability and validity in stroke populations. Conclusions: The use of outcome measures which are related, indirect or proxy indicators of self-management and that have questionable reliability and validity, contributes to an inability to sensitively evaluate the effectiveness of stroke self-SMIs. Further enquiry into how the concept of self-management in stroke operates, would help to clarify the nature and range of specific self-management activities to be targeted and aid the selection of existing appropriate measures or the development of new measures.

Implications for Rehabilitation

• The evaluation of complex interventions such as self-management interventions is aided by clear outcome expectations and valid and reliable measurement.

• This review demonstrates a lack of outcome measures that specifically measure self-management of stroke. A minority of outcome measures that were used as proxy indicators for SM fulfill some of the criteria for quality outlined in the COSMIN checklist.

• Clinicians should select measures which appropriately reflect expected outcomes, giving due consideration to the theoretical underpinnings of the intervention. Further work is required to establish which measures currently in use, if any, accurately reflect stoke self-management.

• In the meantime, researchers should seek to develop psychometrically sound measures of stroke self-management to assist effective evaluation of such interventions in stroke.

     

Turkish validity and reliability study of “Nursing Students' perceptions of Clinical Stressors Scale”

BackgroundClinical education is a significant part of nursing education, but students frequently perceive it as stressful. There is no valid and reliable scale to determine the clinical stressor perceptions of nursing students in Turkey.ObjectiveThe study aims to adapt the “Nursing Students' Clinical Stressor Perceptions Scale” (NSPCSS) into Turkish and perform its validity and reliability study for nursing students.MethodThe research was conducted in a methodological design between 30 September 2021 and 1 November 2021. The sample consisted of 304 nursing students.Results“The Cronbach's alpha” reliability coefficient of the NSPCSS is 0.912. The retest coefficient is 0.90 and the item correlation values are between 0.404 and 0.689.ConclusionThe study has shown that the NSPCSS-TR is a valid and reliable assessment tool to evaluate clinical stressors in nursing students.     

The Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM): An assessment of validity,reliability, and responsiveness

Background

In response for the need of a freely available, stand‐alone, validated outcome measure for use within musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy practice, sensitive enough to measure clinical effectiveness, we developed an MSK patient reported outcome measure.

Objectives

This study examined the validity and reliability of the newly developed Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM) within physiotherapy outpatient settings.

Methods

Two hundred twenty‐four patients attending physiotherapy outpatient departments in South East England with an MSK condition participated in this study. The BmPROM was assessed for user friendliness (rated feedback, N = 224), reliability (internal consistency and test–retest reliability, n = 42), validity (internal and external construct validity, N = 224), and responsiveness (internal, n = 25).

Results

Exploratory factor analysis indicated that a two‐factor model provides a good fit to the data. Factors were representative of “Functionality” and “Wellbeing”. Correlations observed between the BmPROM and SF‐36 domains provided evidence of convergent validity. Reliability results indicated that both subscales were internally consistent with alphas above the acceptable limits for both “Functionality” (α = .85, 95% CI [.81, .88]) and ‘Wellbeing’ (α = .80, 95% CI [.75, .84]). Test–retest analyses (n = 42) demonstrated a high degree of reliability between “Functionality” (ICC = .84; 95% CI [.72, .91]) and “Wellbeing” scores (ICC = .84; 95% CI [.72, .91]). Further examination of test–retest reliability through the Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that the difference between “Functionality” and “Wellbeing” test scores did not vary as a function of absolute test score. Large treatment effect sizes were found for both subscales (Functionality d = 1.10; Wellbeing 1.03).

Conclusion

The BmPROM is a reliable and valid outcome measure for use in evaluating physiotherapy treatment of MSK conditions.     

Instrumented Measurement of Spinal Stiffness: A Systematic Literature Review of Reliability

Objective

The purpose of this review was to critically appraise the quality of studies evaluating the reliability of spinal stiffness assessment devices.

Development of an Evidence-Based Pediatric Preoperative Risk Assessment Checklist

PurposeTo describe how a pediatric preoperative risk assessment (PPRA) checklist was developed to inform perianesthesia nurses of potential postanesthesia care unit (PACU) respiratory complications.DesignEvidence-based practice approach.MethodsA systematic search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane Library databases for this project. In addition, an integrative review process was conducted to develop an assessment checklist of evidence-based pediatric preoperative risk factor criteria associated with PACU respiratory complications. Evidence-based review focused on summarizing and appraising current research for quality levels for each of the individual pediatric preoperative risk factor that comprised the assessment checklist.FindingsEleven risk categories were established: Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, gender, general anesthesia, airway comorbidities, syndromes/congenital anomalies, pulmonary comorbidities, African American ethnicity, obesity, neurologic comorbidities, and cardiac comorbidities. Multidisciplinary experts came to consensus on content and face validity as well as reliability of the PPRA checklist.ConclusionsThe PPRA checklist presents a rapid way to communicate through handoff the preoperative “big picture” to interpret children's acuity and comprehensive risk for significant pediatric respiratory adverse events in the PACU.     

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Evaluating Cancer Symptoms: A Systematic Review

ObjectivesThis systematic review aims to evaluate the psychometric properties and the methodologic quality of studies describing smartphone-, tablet- or computer-based questionnaires for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) evaluating symptoms in oncology and hematology patients.Data SourcesA literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Cinahl, Cuiden, Lilacs, and PsycINFO. Criteria for inclusion were (i) primary studies evaluating scales for symptoms assessment, (ii) developed in adult population (>18 years) with an oncology or hematology malignancy diagnosis, (iii) validations tested via phone or computer, and (iv) describing at least one psychometric property. The exclusion criteria were (i) tools diagnosing any type of cancer and (ii) case series, surveys, and audits. The outcome variables were internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, content validity, structural validity, hypothesis testing, cross-cultural validity, and responsiveness. For the evaluation of the quality of methodology, the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used.ConclusionThe present study gathered five tools in 12 articles to evaluate cancer symptoms through smartphone, tablet, or computer format. Although four were generic, one was specific for breast cancer. Although none of the tools had been fully validated, some of the items of the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) were successfully tested for content, reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness.Implications for Nursing PracticeOur results can guide professionals choosing symptoms assessment instruments when performing telepractice, and they raise awareness of using with precaution scales not intended for remote use.