Widwest association of anatomists

We describe a method for cleanly separating; the cell layers at the bone-marrow interface, which reveals that the myeloid tissue is invested by an epithelial-like layer of specialized squamous cells we call the marrow sac. The scanning electron microscope showed that the sac was fenestrated and that some of its cells pass as perivascular elements with the marrow capillaries that penetrate the bony cortex. The transmission electron microscope (TEM) showed that the cells comprising the marrow sac are less than 0.1 μm thick, overlap at their margins without specialized cell junctions, and are more electron dense than the reticular or fibroblastic cells of the marrow stroma. The fenestrations in the sac were intercellular and were usually occupied by cells having an ultrastructure compatible with an osteoprogenitor cell (OPC) lineage. The observation of a close proximity between the cells of the marrow sac and the osteogenic cells that line the endosteal surfaces of bone suggest that the sac cells, along with the OPCs of the superficial marrow stroma, should be included in any morphological or functional definition of an endosteum.     

American association of anatomists. Pages 1A–50A

Abstracts of papers presented at the 93rd meeting of the American Association of Anatomists a t Omaha under the sponsorship of the University of Nebraska School of Medicine, April 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and May 1, 1980. The abstracts are listed in alphabetical sequence by senior author as follows: scientific papers from platform, poster presentation, or motion picture demonstration; special sessions on history and stereoprojection; and papers by title. Names of authors who are guests of the Association are marked with an asterisk. In addition, the letter “G” following the number of the paper and the term “sponsored by” is used to denote a graduate student presentation by an individual in hislher terminal year of graduate study, sponsored by hislher major professor.     

Fate of abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the American association of clinical anatomists

A recent study examined the rate of full‐length research paper publication following abstract presentation at the British association of clinical anatomists (BACA) annual meetings. The accepted standard for research dissemination is peer‐reviewed publication following presentation at a national or international meeting. The study objectives were quantitative assessment of the abstracts presented at the American Association of Clinical Anatomists' (AACA) annual meetings with regards to the rate of subsequent full‐length publication and comparison to BACA publication rates. All abstracts presented at the AACA annual meetings between 2003 and 2010 were analysed. MEDLINE was searched to identify peer‐reviewed publications arising from each presented abstract. In total, 1,120 abstracts were presented with 22.9% (n = 257) subsequently published as full‐length research papers. The mean number of abstracts presented each year was 140.0 ± 35.9. The median time to publication was 16 months. Chi‐squared analysis showed the publication rate of abstracts presented at AACA (22.9%) was not statistically significantly different to BACA (20.4%) (P = 0.09). A total of 11.3% (n = 29) of the articles were published as full‐length research articles before presentation as an abstract at an AACA meeting compared to 5.4% of abstracts presented at a BACA meeting. These rates are lower but comparable to those of surgical specialty meetings. Further work should try to identify any concerning reasons for the reduced rate of abstract publication in anatomical research. Clin. Anat. 30:140–144, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.