Disseminated tuberculosis mimicking abdominal metastatic carcinoma: A case report

Rationale:Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) has long been a diagnostic challenge for clinicians, often requiring extensive workup and invasive procedures, with the risk of significant complications. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a minimally invasive and highly accurate diagnostic modality for the evaluation of mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenopathy and masses. Several reports on the utility of EUS-FNA as a favorable method for diagnosing extrapulmonary TB have been published.Patient concerns:A 54-year-old man complained of intermittent melena.Diagnoses:18 fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography revealed suspected carcinoma metastasis. EUS-FNA did not reveal any evidence of malignancy.Interventions and outcomes:Laparoscopy was performed, and frozen section pathology during surgery showed granulomas with focal necrosis. Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction was positive, but acid-fast bacilli staining was negative. Anti-TB treatment was initiated, and the patient was advised to visit the local TB dispensary regularly.Lessons:The presence of atypical inflammation of inadequate material or non-representative samples of extra-pulmonary TB was observed on EUS-FNA cytology. Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction and acid fast bacilli should be performed to diagnose TB because of its higher sensitivity.     

细胞块结合免疫组化在内镜超声引导下穿刺诊断胰腺实性占位中的应用价值

目的探讨超声内镜引导下细针穿刺（EUS—FNA）物行不同细胞学检查方法对胰腺占位性病变的诊断价值。方法前瞻性研究广西医科大学第一附属医院2012年3月至2013年6月收治的胰腺实性占位性病变72例,均行超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检取材,分别行常规涂片、液基涂片及细胞块结合免疫组化检查。结果72例患者中,最终确诊胰腺肿瘤61例,包括胰腺癌55例、胰腺假乳头状瘤2例、胰腺内分泌肿瘤4例;良性病变11例,包括慢性胰腺炎4例、胰腺结核2例、胰腺炎4例、黏液性囊腺瘤1例。常规涂片、液基涂片和细胞块结合免疫组化对胰腺肿瘤的诊断敏感度分别为68．9％（42／61）、75．4％（46／61）和90．2％（55／61）,特异度均为100．0％,准确率分别为73．6％（53／72）、79．2％（57／72）和91．7％（66／72）,细胞块结合免疫组化诊断准确率高于常规涂片细胞学及液基细胞学（P均〈0．05）。术后患者均无出血、感染、急性胰腺炎等并发症。结论EUS—FNA是一种安全有效的诊断胰腺占位病变的方法,具有高敏感度和特异度。EUS—FNA细胞块结合免疫组化有助于胰腺实性占位病变的定性诊断和组织学分型诊断,对治疗方案的选择有较大的临床应用价值。     

Clinical Impact of Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Management of Rectal Carcinoma

PURPOSE: There is scant data about the clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in rectal carcinoma. This study was designed to determine the impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration on the staging and management of rectal carcinoma and to compare the staging accuracy of computed tomography scan, endoscopic ultrasound, and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. METHODS: The records of 60 consecutive patients diagnosed with rectal carcinoma referred for endoscopic ultrasound staging were reviewed. Computed tomography scans, endoscopic ultrasound imaging, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration staging, surgical pathology, and subsequent treatment were compared. RESULTS: Of 48 patients who underwent computed tomography scan imaging, the additional information provided by endoscopic ultrasound changed management in 38 percent of patients. Sixteen patients identified as having nonjuxtatumoral lymph nodes underwent fine-needle aspiration and the additional information obtained changed therapy in three (19 percent) of these patients. All five cases of recurrent rectal carcinoma were correctly diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration. Tumor staging accuracy was 45 percent (computed tomography) and 89 percent (endoscopic ultrasound; P < 0.0001); nodal staging accuracy was 68 percent (computed tomography), 85 percent (endoscopic ultrasound), and 92 percent (endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration; P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasound imaging was better than computed tomography scanning at overall tumor staging, whereas endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration demonstrated a trend toward more accurate nodal staging. Preoperative staging with endoscopic ultrasound resulted in a change of management in 38 percent of patients. The addition of fine-needle aspiration changed the management in 19 percent of those who underwent nonjuxtatumoral lymph node sampling. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration accurately diagnosed 100 percent of those with recurrent rectal carcinoma. Clearly, endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration are important for the staging and management of rectal carcinoma and for detecting disease recurrence.Presented at the EUS 13th International Symposium on Endoscopic Ultrasound, New York, New York, October 4 to 6, 2002     

Percutaneous sonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of colonoscopic biopsy-negative colonic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative tissue diagnosis with colonoscopy is not always possible in patients with colonic lesions. OBJECTIVE: To study the usefulness and efficacy of percutaneous ultrasound-guided aspiration biopsy of colonic lesions. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with colonic lesions in whom colonoscopic brush cytology and biopsy were either negative or the lesion was not accessible on colonoscopy on two attempts, underwent percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. The results were compared with surgical findings. RESULTS: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma in 40 patients; one had lymphoma, 2 had tuberculosis, 2 had abscess and 5 patients had negative aspiration. Forty-eight patients (excluding 2 with tuberculosis) underwent laparotomy and the diagnoses on aspiration biopsy were confirmed. Of the 5 negative aspirations, 3 had adenocarcinoma, one had tuberculosis and one intussusception. Thus, we had sensitivity of 91.8%, specificity of 100%, predictive value of positive results 100%, predictive value of negative results 20%, and percentage of false negative results 8.1%. Two patients developed complications--hemorrhage into the peritoneum and sepsis due to perforation at the site of aspiration; both survived after surgery. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous ultrasound-guided aspiration biopsy may be attempted for diagnosis of colonic lesions in situations where it may be the only means of obtaining a cytological diagnosis before surgery.     

The accuracy of EUS-FNA in assessing mediastinal lymphadenopathy and staging patients with NSCLC.

Optimal management of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) depends on tissue diagnosis and accurate staging. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is minimally invasive and provides cytological confirmation of malignant mediastinal disease. The aim was to assess the accuracy of EUS-FNA in cases of enlarged mediastinal lymphadenopathy (LN) of unknown aetiology and in the staging of NSCLC. A total of 52 consecutive patients with stage I-IIIb NSCLC or enlarged mediastinal LN of unknown aetiology underwent EUS-FNA. Negative results were confirmed with a surgical procedure: mediastinoscopy, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or lobectomy with systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection. In total, 34 patients had EUS-FNA performed for diagnosis, whilst the remaining 18 had EUS-FNA for staging. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (95% confidence interval) were 93% (77-99), 100% (78-100), 100% (87-100), 88% (63-99) and 95% (84-99), respectively. When EUS-FNA was used in patients with NSCLC, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 92% (73-99), 100% (69-100), 100% (85-100), 83% (51-98) and 94% (80-99), respectively. For mediastinal LN of unknown aetiology, no malignant disease was missed. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration is an accurate tool for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in nonsmall cell lung cancer and in the diagnosis of unexplained mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration is a minimally invasive procedure that can be used as an adjunct or alternative to mediastinoscopy.     

Advances in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration has evolved to become an indispensable tool for tissue acquisition in patients with gastrointestinal tumors. The technique is useful for sampling of both luminal and extraluminal lesions adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract. A major limitation however has been the inability to procure tissue for histologic analysis. Recently, core biopsy needles have been developed to procure histology-grade material that facilitates both a reliable diagnosis and the ability to conduct molecular profiling for deliverance of personalized anticancer therapy. This review provides a perspective on technical issues that are key for best practices in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.     

Ultrasound-guided aspiration biopsy of small peripheral pulmonary nodules.

We compared the diagnostic yields of ultrasound-guided aspiration biopsy, sputum cytology, and fiberoptic bronchoscopy with biopsy in 30 patients with peripheral pulmonary nodules smaller than 3.0 cm in diameter. Among them, there were 4 minute nodules with diameter less than 1.0 cm, 12 between 1.1 to 2.0 cm, and 14 between 2.1 to 3.0 cm. The final diagnoses in these 30 patients, as confirmed by histologic findings, microbiology, and clinical follow-up, revealed 24 malignant lesions and 6 benign. All of these 30 nodules received ultrasound-guided transthoracic fine-needle aspiration biopsy, and confirmative diagnoses were obtained in 27 (90 percent). Twenty-two (92 percent) of 24 patients with malignant nodules had positive cytology for malignancy and 5 (83 percent) of 6 patients with benign lesions had diagnosis made by cytologic and microbiologic examinations. One patient developed asymptomatic pneumothorax after needle aspiration. The size of the lesions did not affect the diagnostic yield and complication rate. None of the lesions was diagnosed by sputum cytology (0 of 19; 0 percent). Two patients had diagnoses obtained by fiberoptic bronchoscopy with biopsy (2 of 10; 20 percent). We conclude that ultrasound-guided aspiration biopsy is a useful and safe method for diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules, even when the size of the nodule is less than 3 cm in diameter. The diagnostic yield far exceeds that which can be obtained by sputum cytology and fiberoptic bronchoscopy with biopsy.     

A comparison of the accuracy of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion

Background: The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate echo features of lymph nodes during endoscopic ultrasound and assess the utility of these echo features and endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration in predicting malignant lymph node invasion. Methods: Thirty-five lymph nodes in 25 patients with lung, esophageal, and pancreatic cancer were evaluated by endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopic ultrasound examinations were performed with a radial scanning echoendoscope. Confirmation of benign lymph nodes was obtained by surgical resection while malignant lymph nodes were confirmed by real-time endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration with a linear array echoendoscope. Results: Nineteen benign lymph nodes and 16 malignant lymph nodes in the mediastinum, celiac axis, and the peripancreatic area were included in the study. The following echo features were compared between benign and malignant lymph nodes: size greater than 1 cm, hypoechoic, distinct margins, and round shape. No single feature independently predicted malignant invasion. When all four of the above features were present in the same lymph node, the accuracy for predicting malignant invasion was 80%. However, all four features of malignant involvement were present in only 25% (4 of 16) of malignant lymph nodes. Our study also suggests that the above echo features may be a less reliable predictor of malignant invasion in pulmonary malignancies when compared to gastrointestinal cancers. Endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes in 22 patients revealed malignant lymph node invasion in 16 and benign cells in 6 patients. Conclusion: Endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle aspiration is an important adjunct for accurate lymph node assessment for malignancy. (Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:474-9.)     

Relationship of Pancreatic Mass Size and Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration

Background  

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is central to discerning the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors through tissue acquisition. Test performance is affected by a number of factors including location of mass within the pancreas, presence of onsite cytology technologist, and number of passes with the needle. The influence of tumor size has not been well studied.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

The objective of the current study was to assess the yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis in a large patient group. Bronchoscopy with transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) is nondiagnostic in 30% of patients with suspected sarcoidosis and has a risk of pneumothorax and haemoptysis. In order to obtain a diagnosis, mediastinoscopy is often performed as the next diagnostic procedure. EUS-FNA provides a nonsurgical alternative for the demonstration of noncaseating granulomas by aspirating mediastinal lymph nodes from the oesophagus. In total, 51 patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I and II underwent EUS-FNA. Thirty-six patients (71%) previously underwent a nondiagnostic bronchoscopy. All patients were clinically followed (median 18 months) and surgical-pathological verification occurred in those patients with EUS aspirates that contained unrepresentative material. EUS-FNA demonstrated noncaseating granulomas without necrosis in 41 of 50 patients (82%) with the final diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Specific ultrasound features of clustered, well-demarcated iso-echoic lymph nodes were observed in 64% of patients with sarcoidosis. No complications occurred. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration has a high yield in diagnosing sarcoidosis and qualifies as the next diagnostic step after a nondiagnostic bronchoscopy. The current authors expect that endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration will reduce the number of mediastinoscopies for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis dramatically.     

Comparative study of diagnostic value of cytologic sampling by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration and that by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography for the management of pancreatic mass without biliary stricture

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) can now provide a cytopathological diagnosis of underlying pancreatic malignancy with higher success rates than endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). To determine the significance of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic mass without biliary stricture, the value of cytopathological diagnosis obtained by EUS-FNA was retrospectively compared with that by ERP, and the complications associated with these procedures evaluated. METHODS: Eighty-three patients who were suspected to have a pancreatic mass (excluding a cystic mass), without biliary stricture on conventional ultrasound and/or computed tomography were enrolled. The EUS-FNA biopsy was performed in 53 patients and cytology utilizing ERP was performed in 30 patients. RESULTS: The sampling rate of adequate specimen was 100% in both groups. In the EUS-FNA group, the overall results for the available samples were sensitivity 92.9% and accuracy 94.3%. In contrast, in the ERCP group, the overall results were sensitivity 33.3% and accuracy 46.7%. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.01). With regard to complications, there was a significant difference (P < 0.01) in the frequency of post-procedure pancreatitis between the EUS-FNA group and ERP group (0%, 0/53 vs 33.3%, 10/30, respectively). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration is safer and more accurate for the cytopathological diagnosis of suspected pancreatic masses without a biliary stricture as compared with cytology during ERP. Endoscopic ultrasonography with FNA should be considered a preferred test (prior to attempting endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) when a cytological diagnosis of a pancreatic mass is required, especially when there is no biliary obstruction, or when emergent decompression of an obstructed biliary tree is not considered clinically necessary due to lack of signs and symptoms of cholangitis.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy: diagnostic yield, pitfalls, quality management part 1: optimizing specimen collection and diagnostic efficiency

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsies have proven to be of significant value in the diagnostic evaluation of benign and malignant diseases, as well as in the staging of malignant tumours of the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs. The high prognostic and therapeutic relevance of the resulting cytopathological diagnoses necessitates a shared responsibility of endosonographer and cytopathologist. Quality control programs are required. The diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsies depends on the location, size and characteristics of target tissues, and technical factors (i. e., type of needle used, biopsy technique, and material processing). Other weighing factors include training, expertise and interaction of the endosonographer with cytopathologists. On-site cytological evaluation, which has proven to be successful in optimising the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy, is notably practiced in Northern American and French academic institutions. It seems to be a sensible alternative to collect specimens for histological and immunohistochemical investigations in addition to the cytological smears in consideration of the economic and structural terms in the German health-care system. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration succeeds in harvesting core biopsies in 3 out of 4 cases with 22-gauge needles. Therefore the use of 19-gauge needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration or trucut biopsy may be necessary only in selected cases.     

Adrenocortical Carcinoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a very poor prognosis. A 77-year-old man underwent imaging studies due to poorly controlled hypertension, which revealed a mass measuring 43 mm in diameter near the left adrenal gland. There were no findings indicative of pheochromocytoma. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed for the preoperative pathological evaluation, and the findings indicated a possibility of ACC. Based on these results, curative surgery was performed. If the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is excluded, then EUS-FNA for adrenal lesions is relatively safe. It can also be used for the preoperative diagnosis of ACC.     

High Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Malignant Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Digestive Diseases and Sciences - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is increasingly being used for diagnosing lymphadenopathy. We aim to systematically review the...     

Diagnosis by endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of tuberculous lymphadenitis involving the peripancreatic lymph nodes： A case report

Pancreatic tuberculosis is an extremely rare form of extrapulmonary disease. The diagnosis preoperatively is difficult because clinical, laboratory and radiologic findings are nonspecific. Published data indicate that these lesions mimic cystic neoplasms of the pancreas and the confirmation of clinical suspicion could only be obtained by an open surgical biopsy. Recently, fine needle aspiration cytology has been shown to be a safe, reliable and cost-effective alternative. We report a new case of a peripancreatic tuberculosis in a 52 year old woman and review the relevant literature, paying special attention to the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound guided-fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis.     

Overlooked risk for needle tract seeding following endoscopic ultrasound-guided minimally invasive tissue acquisition

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided minimally invasive tissue acquisition can be performed by two approaches as follows: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fineneedle aspiration(EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy(EUS-FNB). These have been evolved into leading approaches and widely used for the histological diagnosis of tumors in the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs. However, the role of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB in disease diagnosis and evaluation remains controversial. Although the incidence of surgery-associated complications remains low, the consequences of needle tract seeding can be serious or even life-threatening. Recently, increasing case reports of needle tract seeding are emerging, especially caused by EUS-FNA. This complication needs serious consideration. In the present work, we integrated these case reports and the related literature, and summarized the relevant cases and technical characteristics of needle tract seeding caused by EUS-FNA and EUSFNB. Collectively, our findings provided valuable insights into the prevention and reduction of such serious complication.     

Rare pancreatic neoplasms: the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration—a large single center study

Background  Tumors other than ductal adenocarcinomas constitute 10%–15% of all pancreatic tumors. We describe the performance and pitfalls of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of these rare pancreatic tumors and their characteristic cytopathological features. Methods  The records of 455 pancreatic fine-needle aspiration procedures done between March 1997 and August 2006 at Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan, were reviewed. Besides cytology, aspirated material was routinely submitted in formalin for cell-block analysis. The reference standard for final diagnosis was surgical pathology from resected specimens. Results  Twenty-eight rare (nonductal adenocarcinomas) pancreatic tumors were identified. Overall, EUS-FNA with the results of cytology, cell-block processing, and immunohistochemistry could correctly diagnose the type of neoplasm in 19 (67.9%) cases. EUS-FNA could distinguish benign from malignant rare tumors with a sensitivity of 69.2%, a specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 79.0%, and accuracy of 85.7%. None of three malignant pancreatic endocrine neoplasms could be diagnosed as malignant. An adequate core tissue sample could be obtained in 21 cases (75.0%) and provide a histopathological diagnosis in 19 (67.9%) cases. EUS-FNA could change the presumptive diagnosis in 11 (39.3%) cases. Specific immunochemical studies were useful adjuncts to the diagnosis. No major or minor complication was noted in any patient. Conclusions  Pancreatic neoplasms other than ductal adenocarcinomas have diverse imaging and histopathological features. EUS-FNA is accurate and safe for their identification.     

EUS-FNA for suspected malignant biliary strictures after negative endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy

Background

Endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy are widely used for the pathological diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures (MBS). However, the sensitivity of these methods remains insufficient, and it can be difficult to confirm the diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and the impact of this technique on clinical management in patients with suspected MBS where endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy yielded negative results.

Methods

This study included 225 consecutive patients with suspected MBS, who underwent endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy at our institutions. Negative results were obtained for these pathological tests in 75 patients, and EUS-FNA was performed in 22 of these patients. We retrospectively compared the EUS-FNA results with the final diagnosis and examined the influence of the EUS-FNA diagnosis on treatment selection.

Results

FNA specimens were successfully obtained in all patients, and the pathological results confirmed malignancy in 16 cases and predicted that the other 6 cases were benign. Of the 6 cases that were suspected to be benign, 3 patients were diagnosed with xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis by surgical pathology, and the remaining 3 patients were diagnosed with benign diseases at a follow-up after 12?C18?months. Thus, the EUS-FNA-based diagnosis was proven correct for all the patients. In addition, the treatment strategy was altered as a result of the EUS-FNA results in the above 6 patients (27%).

Conclusions

EUS-FNA is a sensitive and safe diagnostic modality for patients with suspected MBS and can be an additional option in cases where endoscopic brush cytology and biopsy have produced negative results.     

Diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA-based cytology distinguishing malignant and benign IPMNs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesDifferential diagnosis of malignant and benign intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) is essential to determine the optimal treatment. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is currently used to diagnose pancreatic cystic lesions worldwide, but few studies have focused on the diagnostic yield to distinguish malignant and benign IPMNs. Therefore, we aim to systematically review the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA-based cytology to distinguish malignant and benign IPMNs.MethodsRelevant studies with a reference standard of definitive surgical histology which published between 2002 and 2012 were identified via MEDLINE and SCOPUS. Malignant IPMNs included invasive adenocarcinoma, carcinoma in situ, and high-grade dysplasia.ResultsFour studies with 96 patients were included in this meta-analysis. For diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA-based cytology distinguishing malignant and benign IPMNs, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 64.8% (95% CI, 0.44–0.82) and 90.6% (95% CI, 0.81–0.96), respectively. Similarly, the positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 6.35 (95% CI, 2.95–13.68) and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.14–1.34), respectively. Malignant IPMNs were observed in 20.8% (20/96) of patients in EUS-FNA studies.ConclusionsEUS-FNA-based cytology has good specificity but poor sensitivity in differentiating benign from malignant IPMNs. Newer techniques or markers are needed to improve diagnostic yield.     

All necrotizing nodes are not tuberculosis – A report of two cases

IntroductionKikuchi-Fujimoto disease is a benign and self-limiting systemic disorder of unknown aetiology characterised by fever, superficial lymphadenopathy and leukopenia. In highly endemic & low-resource country like India, it is frequently misdiagnosed as tuberculosis.Case reportBoth the cases were diagnosed as necrotizing lymphadenitis by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Tuberculin skin prick test (TST) was positive for one case and negative for the other case. Cartridge based nucleic acid amplification test (CBNAAT) from lymph node aspirate was negative for mycobacterium tuberculosis in both the cases, later on histopathology of lymph node showed diagnosis of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease.ConclusionKikuchi Fujimoto is a self-limiting disease systemic disease of unknown aetiology. A definite diagnosis can be established by incisional/excisional biopsy of the lymph node. When dealing with cases of tubercular lymphadenitis, Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease should be kept as differential diagnosis.