Traditional thoughts on the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome

The pathogenesis of symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is multifactorial and varies from patient to patient. Disturbances of motor function in the small intestine and colon and smooth-muscle dysfunction in other gut and extraintestinal regions are prominent. Abnormalities of sensory function in visceral and somatic structures are detected in most patients with IBS, which may relate to peripheral sensitization or altered central nervous system processing of afferent information. Contributions from psychosocial disturbances are observed in patients from tertiary centers and primary practice. Proof of causation of symptom genesis for most of these factors is limited.     

Current insights into the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome

Recent reports have emphasized the possible role of mucosal immune activation and inflammation in neuropathic changes in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, novel findings using functional brain imaging techniques have underlined the importance of altered perception of visceral stimuli to symptom generation in IBS. These new developments have rekindled an old debate on peripheral versus central mechanisms in the pathophysiology of IBS. In this review we discuss the latest findings in light of these two concepts. In addition, we provide evidence for the hypothesis that, in the absence of alterations in endogenous pain modulation systems and changes in visceral perception, chronic inflammatory mucosal changes in the gut are not a plausible mechanism to explain the presence of chronic abdominal pain, a cardinal IBS symptom.     

Recent developments in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome(IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder, the pathophysiology of which is not completely known, although it has been shown that genetic/social learning factors, diet, intestinal microbiota, intestinal low-grade inflammation, and abnormal gastrointestinal endocrine cells play a major role. Studies of familial aggregation and on twins have confirmed the heritability of IBS. However, the proposed IBS risk genes are thus far nonvalidated hits rather than true predisposing factors. There is no convincing evidence that IBS patients suffer from food allergy/intolerance, with the effect exerted by diet seemingly caused by intake of poorly absorbed carbohydrates and fiber. Obesity is a possible comorbidity of IBS. Differences in the microbiota between IBS patients and healthy controls have been reported, but the association between IBS symptoms and specific bacterial species is uncertain. Low-grade inflammation appears to play a role in the pathophysiology of a major subset of IBS, namely postinfectious IBS. The density of intestinal endocrine cells is reduced in patients with IBS, possibly as a result of genetic factors, diet, intestinal microbiota, and low-grade inflammation interfering with the regulatory signals controlling the intestinal stem-cell clonogenic and differentiation activities. Furthermore, there is speculation that this decreased number of endocrine cells is responsible for the visceral hypersensitivity, disturbed gastrointestinal motility, and abnormal gut secretion seen in IBS patients.     

Intestinal microbiota in pathophysiology and management of irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional bowel disorder without any structural or metabolic abnormalities that sufficiently explain the symptoms, which include abdominal pain and discomfort, and bowel habit changes such as diarrhea and constipation. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial: visceral hypersensitivity, dysmotility, psychosocial factors, genetic or environmental factors, dysregulation of the brain-gut axis, and altered intestinal microbiota have all been proposed as possible causes. The human intestinal microbiota are composed of more than 1000 different bacterial species and 10¹⁴ cells, and are essential for the development, function, and homeostasis of the intestine, and for individual health. The putative mechanisms that explain the role of microbiota in the development of IBS include altered composition or metabolic activity of the microbiota, mucosal immune activation and inflammation, increased intestinal permeability and impaired mucosal barrier function, sensory-motor disturbances provoked by the microbiota, and a disturbed gut-microbiota-brain axis. Therefore, modulation of the intestinal microbiota through dietary changes, and use of antibiotics, probiotics, and anti-inflammatory agents has been suggested as strategies for managing IBS symptoms. This review summarizes and discusses the accumulating evidence that intestinal microbiota play a role in the pathophysiology and management of IBS.     

Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome]

According to Rome II criteria, irritable bowel syndrome is defined as a group of functional bowel disorders in which abdominal discomfort or pain is associated with defecation or change in bowel habit and is associated with features of disordered defecation. A diagnosis is based on identifying the consistent symptoms with the exclusion of other organic or functional disorders having similar clinical presentations in a cost-effective manner. A physical examination should be performed on the first visit and on subsequent visits as needed. Two algorithms for the evaluation of patients seen in primary care settings and two other algorithms for patients presenting to gastroenterologists are presented. In general, if Rome II criteria are fulfilled, alarm features are not present, and screening studies from the referring physician are negative, further testing is not needed. Screening studies are recommended when certain historical information is present. In many cases, the therapeutic trial can be undertaken before further diagnostic studies are done and will depend on the symptom subtype and its severity. It needs to be emphasized that patients presenting with typical symptoms and no alarm signs are rarely found to have another diagnosis, supporting the benefit of ongoing care and symptomatic management rather than continued diagnostic evaluation. If initial treatment fails, or certain clinical features emerge requiring further evaluation, studies may be performed by gastroenterologists in specialty centers.     

Management of irritable bowel syndrome]

Management of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is based on the positive diagnosis of the symptom complex, limited exclusion of underlying organic disease and institution of a therapeutic trial. As a general approach, physician should establish an effective therapeutic relationship by providing clearly understood explanation to patients of the causes and implications of their symptoms, supported by reassurance and appropriate therapy. Treatment of IBS needs to be individualized, focusing on patients' predominant symptoms. In diarrhea- predominant IBS, loperamide and some antispasmodic agents are efficacious. In constipation-predominant IBS, fiber and bulk laxatives are used empirically, but their efficacy is variable and may aggravate bloating. The 5-HT4 receptor agonist, tegaserod is efficacious in female patients with IBS and constipation. In patients with IBS and abdominal pain, antispasmodics and antidepressants can be used but there is weak evidence of potential benefit. New novel pharmacological agents are being carefully appraised as potential drugs for the future.     

肠黏膜低度炎症与肠易激综合征

肠易激综合征(IBS)是一种常见的胃肠功能性疾病,但其发病机制仍未明确,可能与胃肠道动力异常、内脏高敏感性、肠道过度产气、肠道微生态环境改变及心理精神因素等有关。近年来研究认为肠道黏膜的低度炎症与IBS的发病关系密切,这一观点可能为IBS发病机制及治疗提供新的依据。     

The irritable bowel syndrome

The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a familiar problem in the clinic, but as a disease entity it remains ill defined. Much confusion has arisen in the past, because of the inappropriate inclusion within the category of IBS of almost any patient with unexplained abdominal discomfort. Recent work has established that IBS patients can be positively identified by a cluster of specific symptoms. With the use of these criteria, it seems likely that IBS patients suffer from a diffuse motor abnormality of the gut associated with visceral hypersensitivity; although there is no associated psychopathology, a central nervous system component to the disorder is possible. Better insight into IBS promises more effective management.     

Is irritable bowel syndrome an organic disorder?

Irritable bowel syndrome(IBS)is a common gastrointestinal disorder that is generally considered to be functional because there appears to be no associated anatomical defect.Stress and psychological factors are thought to play an important role in IBS.The gut neuroendocrine system(NES),which regulates all functions of the gastrointestinal tract,consists of endocrine cells that are scattered among the epithelial cells of the mucosa,and the enteric nervous system.Although it is capable of operating independently from the centra nervous system(CNS),the gut NES is connected to and modulated by the CNS.This review presents evidence for the presence of an anatomical defect in IBS patients,namely in the gastrointestinal endocrine cells.These cells have specialized microvilli that project into the lumen and function as sensors for the luminal content and respond to luminal stimuli by releasing hormones into the lamina propria,which starts a chain reaction that progresses throughout the entire NES.The changes in the gastrointestinal endocrine cells observed in IBS patients are highly consistent with the other abnormalities reported in IBS patients,such as visceral hypersensitivity,dysmotility,and abnormal secretion.     

Definition and epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome]

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by abdominal discomfort, bloating and disturbed defecation in the absence of any identifiable physical, radiologic or laboratory abnormalities indicative of organic gastrointestinal disease. Diagnosis is based on the identification of symptoms according to Manning, Rome I and Rome II criteria and exclusion of alarm indicators. Approximately, 10-20% of the general population has IBS, and it affects female more often than male for unexplained pathophysiologic reasons. In Korea, it has been reported that the prevalence of IBS is 2.2-6.6% by Rome II criteria and 22.3% by Manning criteria. The health care-seeking population was only 28.6% of community population. Although most patients do not seek medical help, the disease accounts for huge costs for both patients and health-care systems and worsens patients' quality of life significantly.     

Convergence of neuro-endocrine-immune pathways in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome

Disordered signalling between the brain and the gut are generally accepted to underlie the functional bowel disorder, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, partly due to the lack of disease-defining biomarkers, understanding the aetiology of this complex and multifactorial disease remains elusive. This common gastrointestinal disorder is characterised by alterations in bowel habit such as diarrhoea and/or constipation, bloating and abdominal pain, and symptom exacerbation has been linked with periods of stress, both psychosocial and infection-related. Indeed, a high level of comorbidity exists between IBS and stress-related mood disorders such as anxiety and depression. Moreover, studies have observed alterations in autonomic output and neuro-endocrine signalling in IBS patients. Accumulating evidence indicates that a maladaptive stress response, probably mediated by the stress hormone, corticotropin-releasing factor contributes to the initiation, persistence and severity of symptom flares. Other risk factors for developing IBS include a positive family history, childhood trauma, dietary factors and prior gastrointestinal infection. An emerging role has been attributed to the importance of immune factors in the pathophysiology of IBS with evidence of altered cytokine profiles and increased levels of mucosal immune cells. These factors have also been shown to have direct effects on neural signalling. This review discusses how pathological changes in neural, immune and endocrine pathways, and communication between these systems, contribute to symptom flares in IBS.     

Role of visceral sensitivity in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome

Visceral hypersensitivity has been recognised as a characteristic of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It may be involved in the pathogenesis of abdominal pain/discomfort, and seems to result from the sensitisation of nerve afferent pathways originating from the gastrointestinal tract. From a clinical point of view, hypersensitivity, although frequent, is not a constant finding among patients with IBS and cannot therefore be considered as a diagnostic marker of the condition. The advances made in understanding visceral hypersensitivity in patients with IBS are reviewed: the factors that influence abdominal distension are defined and different therapeutic perspectives are examined.     

New insights into the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome.

The pathogenesis and pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome is complex and still incompletely known. Potential pathogenetic factors include genes, infectious events, psychological symptoms and other loosely defined environmental factors. Both alterations at the central and peripheral level are thought to contribute to the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, including psychosocial factors, abnormal gastrointestinal motility and secretion, and visceral hypersensitivity. Today irritable bowel syndrome is viewed upon as a disorder of dysregulation of the so-called brain-gut axis, involving abnormal function in the enteric, autonomic and/or central nervous systems, with peripheral abnormalities probably dominating in some patients and disturbed central processing of signals from the periphery in others. Lines of evidence also suggest that inflammation within the gastrointestinal tract may be of great importance in at least subgroups of irritable bowel syndrome patients. To conclude, a complex picture of the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome is emerging, with interactions between several different alterations resulting in the divergent symptom pattern in these patients.     

The functional-organic dichotomy: postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease-irritable bowel syndrome

Gastroenterologists often encounter situations when the clinical and pathophysiological features that typically distinguish functional from organic disorders overlap. This "blurring of boundaries" can occur with post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS), a subset of IBS and a newly described entity IBD-IBS. The key associating features include pain and usually diarrheal symptoms that are disproportionate to the observed pathology, microscopic inflammation, and often a co-association with psychological distress. A previous initiating gastrointestinal infection is required for PI-IBS and assumed for IBD-IBS. Using this perspective we discuss the clinical and pathophysiological features of PI-IBS and IBD-IBS and the growing evidence for the overlapping features of these two disorders in terms of alteration of gut flora, immune dysregulation, and role of stress. A unifying model of PI-IBS and IBD-IBS is proposed that may have important clinical and research implications. It obligates us to reframe our understanding of illness and disease from the dualistic biomedical model into a more integrated biopsychosocial (BPS) perspective.     

Therapeutic strategies for functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome based on pathophysiology

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are common and distressing. They are so named because a defined pathophysiology in terms of structural or biochemical pathways is lacking. Traditionally FGIDs have been conceptualized as brain–gut disorders, with subgroups of patients demonstrating visceral hypersensitivity and motility abnormalities as well as psychological distress. However, it is becoming apparent that there are certain structural or biochemical gut alterations among subsets with the common FGIDs, most notably functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). For example, a sodium channel mutation has been identified in IBS that may account for 2 % of cases, and subtle intestinal inflammation has been observed in both IBS and FD. Other research has implicated early life events and stress, autoimmune disorders and atopy and infections, the gut microbiome and disordered mucosal immune activation in patients with IBS or FD. Understanding the origin of symptoms in FGIDs will allow therapy to be targeted at the pathophysiological changes, not at merely alleviating symptoms, and holds hope for eventual cure in some cases. For example, there are promising developments in manipulating the microbiome through diet, prebiotics and antibiotics in IBS, and testing and treating patients for Helicobacter pylori infection remains a mainstay of therapy in patients with dyspepsia and this infection. Locally acting drugs such as linaclotide have been an advance in treating the symptoms of constipation-predominant IBS, but do not alter the natural history of the disease. A role for a holistic approach to patients with FGIDs is warranted, as brain-to-gut and gut-to-brain pathways appear to be activated.     

The possible role of gastrointestinal endocrine cells in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome

Introduction: The etiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is unknown, but several factors appear to play a role in its pathophysiology, including abnormalities of the gastrointestinal endocrine cells. The present review illuminates the possible role of gastrointestinal hormones in the pathophysiology of IBS and the possibility of utilizing the current knowledge in treating the disease.

Areas covered: Research into the intestinal endocrine cells and their possible role in the pathophysiology of IBS is discussed. Furthermore, the mechanisms underlying the abnormalities in the gastrointestinal endocrine cells in IBS patients are revealed.

Expert commentary: The abnormalities observed in the gastrointestinal endocrine cells in IBS patients explains their visceral hypersensitivity, gastrointestinal dysmotility, and abnormal intestinal secretion, as well as the interchangeability of symptoms over time. Clarifying the role of the intestinal stem cells in the pathophysiology of IBS may lead to new treatment methods for IBS.