Analysis of the bleeding pattern in assisted reproduction cycles with luteal phase supplementation using vaginal micronized progesterone

This study was designed to determine the effects of a vaginal micronized progesterone preparation on bleeding patterns and pregnancy outcomes after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). The study population consisted of 149 consecutive women who had undergone IVF-ICSI using 'long-protocol' stimulation with buserelin-human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). A retrospective chart analysis of computerized medical records was undertaken. Vaginal progesterone (200 mg three times daily) was begun the day before oocyte retrieval and continued for a minimum of 16-19 days following human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Occurrence of bleeding following HCG injection, pregnancy rate and outcomes, and serum concentrations of oestradiol were measured. Women undergoing IVF and embryo transfer with ICSI and using vaginal progesterone for luteal support had normal luteal phase lengths (day of HCG minus day of onset of bleeding). In the absence of pregnancy, bleeding occurred after 19.2 +/- 3.9 days (mean +/- SD). Out of the pregnant group only three women bled within 19 days of HCG administration: two had biochemical pregnancies which spontaneously vanished and one evolved to term. The results reflect the normal bleeding pattern to be expected when vaginal progesterone is used for luteal support in IVF and embryo transfer, an approach whose efficacy has been amply proven. No shortened luteal phases were observed using vaginally administered progesterone.     

Timing luteal phase support in GnRH agonist down-regulated IVF/embryo transfer cycles

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of three different times of onset of luteal phase support on ongoing pregnancy rate in infertile patients undergoing treatment with GnRH down-regulated IVF and embryo transfer (IVF/ET). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive eligible patients planned to undergo their first IVF treatment cycle were randomly allocated to receive vaginal progesterone as luteal support at three different time points, that is, after HCG administration for final oocyte maturation (HCG group), at the day of oocyte retrieval (OR group) or at the day of ET (ET group). The primary endpoint of this study was ongoing pregnancy rate. RESULTS: A total of 385 women were randomized, 130 were allocated to the HCG group, 128 to the OR group and 127 to the ET group. An ongoing pregnancy rate of 20.8% was found in the HCG group versus 22.7 and 23.6% in the OR group and ET group, respectively. The mean number and quality of the retrieved oocytes and the transferred embryos did not differ. CONCLUSION: Based on this data, an 18% difference in ongoing pregnancy rate between the three different times of onset of luteal phase support in GnRH agonist down-regulated IVF/ET cycles can be refuted. Smaller clinically meaningful differences may be present.     

Endocrinology: Progesterone alone versus progesterone combined with HCG as luteal support in GnRHa/HMG induced IVF cycles: a randomized clinical trial

Two different regimens of luteal support in gonadotrophin hormone-releasinghormone (GnRH) analoguefhuman menopausal gonadotrophin (GnRHa/HMG)-inducedin-vitro fertilization cycles (IVF) were compared in a randomizedclinical trial. After embryo transfer, either vaginal progesteronealone was administered (n=89, P group), or a combination ofvaginal progesterone and human chorionic gonadotrophin (n=87,P/HCG group). The primary aim of this study was to assess theeffect of the different regimens of luteal support on the pregnancyrate. The secondary aim was to compare oestradiol and progesteroneconcentrations in the luteal phase between the two groups, andassess their effect on the pregnancy rate. A clinical pregnancyrate of 15% was found in the P/HCG group in comparison with26% in the P group (odds ratio 0.49; 99% confidence interval:0.18–1.3). The luteal serum oestradiol and progesteronevalues in the P/HCG group were significantly higher when comparedwith the P group on the 6th, 9th and 12th day after oocyte retrieval(Wilcoxon P<0.001). In accordance with the high oestradiolconcentrations, more cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome(OHSS) were found in the P/HCG group. Oestradiol values on the9th day after oocyte retrieval, presumably the day of implantation,appeared to be higher in women who did not become clinicallypregnant. We conclude that vaginal progesterone alone providessufficient luteal support in GnRHa/HMG induced IVF cycles. Thecombination of vaginal progesterone and HCG as luteal supportleads to significant high luteal oestradiol and progesteroneconcentrations. But a high concentration of oestradiol seemsto have a deleterious effect on the implantation process, resultingin a low pregnancy rate.     

The effect of luteal support with human chorionic gonadotrophin or progesterone on the daily progesterone profile after different types of ovarian stimulation.

Attempts have been made to increase the low pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles by luteal phase support with progesterone or human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). Previously, this practice has been inconsistent and the results unclear. The detailed effect of support on the progesterone profile in the luteal phase was assessed by daily salivary progesterone measurements in non-conception IVF cycles. The comparison of HCG and progesterone support in two different stimulation protocols showed that the profile of luteal progesterone concentrations was similar in control cycles and those supported with a vaginal progesterone suppository, showing an early decrease by the fourth luteal day. In cycles supported with multiple doses of HCG, the progesterone profile was normal but slightly increased up to the 9th luteal day subsequently falling to basal levels by the fourteenth luteal day.     

The benefits of mid-luteal addition of human chorionic gonadotrophin in in-vitro fertilization using a down-regulation protocol and luteal support with progesterone

Luteal support is essential in in-vitro fertilization (IVF)when long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)is used. Because progesterone lacks luteotrophic stimulation,it seems to be the drug of choice in cases with an increasedrisk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The aim ofthis study was to assess the beneficial effect of the mid-lutealaddition of human choriomc gonadotrophin (HCG) in IVF, usinga down-regulation protocol and luteal support with progesterone,in a prospective randomized study. The study included 170 IVFcycles down-regulated with long-acting GnRHa which were supportedwith 50 mg/day progesterone i.m. during the luteal phase. Patientswere evaluated in the mid-luteal period. Those without clinicalsigns of OHSS, oestradiol concentrations <1000 pg/ml andprogesterone concentrations <50 mg/ml were randomly allocatedto either the addition of 2500 IU HCG (HCG+ group) or no HCG(HCG– group). End luteal phase progesterone concentrationsamong non-pregnant patients were used to assess the contributionof exogenous progesterone and to categorize pregnancies accordingto their corpus luteum function. Similar low OHSS (2.7 and 1.8%)and pregnancy (30 and 29%) rates were observed in the HCG+ andHCG– groups respectively. Of the 26 pregnancies in theHCG+ cases, there was only one case with reduced corpus luteumfunction, compared with 12 of the 25 pregnancies among HCG–patients. Cases with reduced corpus luteum function requiredcontinuous progesterone support and presented lower HCG concentrationsand a higher rate of adverse pregnancy outcome. We concludethat mid-luteal HCG addition does not affect pregnancy rate,but in fact helps to preserve corpus luteum function and avoidsthe need for further supplementation during early pregnancy.     

The luteal phase after in-vitro fertilization and related procedures

To evaluate any beneficial effect of progesterone supplemen–tationduring the luteal phase of GIFT or IVF cycles stimulated byclomiphene citrate and HMG, two random prospective studies wereperformed. In the first study, a group of patients receiveda luteal phase supplement of 50 mg natural progesterone i.m.daily from the day of oocyte retrieval onwards. Initial resultson 168 patients indicated that the pregnancy rate was similarin patients with or without progesterone supplements. No differenceswere found between the two groups in an analysis of pregnantand failed cycles. In a second study two different protocolsof luteal phase sup–plementation after Buserelin–HMGstimulation were com–pared: natural progesterone in combinationwith oestradiol valerate (50 patients) or HCG supplements (41patients). A 32% pregnancy rate per cycle was encountered inboth groups. Endometrial biopsies, taken during the luteal phasefrom patients who did not undergo embryo replacement, revealedretarded endometrial development in most of the biopsies.     

Profound LH suppression after GnRH antagonist administration is associated with a significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rate in IVF

BACKGROUND: The significance of suppressed LH levels in GnRH antagonist cycles for IVF outcome is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the association between LH levels and ongoing pregnancy achievement after GnRH antagonist initiation in IVF cycles. METHODS: Ovarian stimulation with a fixed dose of 200 IU recombinant FSH and daily GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) 0.25 mg from day 6 of stimulation was initiated in 116 women. Patients were not pretreated with an oral contraceptive. Induction of final oocyte maturation was performed with HCG 10,000 IU as soon as three follicles of > or =17 mm were present in ultrasound, and was followed by oocyte pick-up, conventional IVF or ICSI, and embryo transfer. The luteal phase was supplemented with vaginal progesterone. RESULTS: A significant decrease of both ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate was present across groups of patients with increasing LH levels. The highest implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate was present in those patients with LH levels on day 8 of stimulation < or =0.5 IU/l. CONCLUSIONS: Profound suppression of LH on day 8 of stimulation is associated with a significantly higher chance of achieving an ongoing pregnancy. More studies are necessary to evaluate this phenomenon further.     

A prospective randomized study on oestradiol valerate supplementation in addition to intravaginal micronized progesterone in buserelin and HMG induced superovulation

A prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate theuse of adding oestradiol valerate 6 mg per os daily to intravaginalmicronized progesterone (600 mg daily) as luteal supplements.The study comprised 378 infertile women superovulated with agonadotrophin releasing-hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausalgonadotrophins (HMG) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or zygoteintra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT). The clinical pregnancy ratewas similar (29%) whether or not oestradiol valerate was addedto intravaginal progesterone. Eighteen out of twenty-two endometrialbiopsies were in phase, and morphological evaluations of thetwo luteal supplementation groups were not different. Serumhormone profiles in singleton pregnancies showed a similar dayof appearance of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) in bothprotocols but significantly lower oestradiol concentrationsarose in the group without oestradiol valerate. In 32% of thesingleton pregnancies, the first appearance of HCG occurredlater than day 12 after HCG injection; in those ongoing pregnancies,corpus luteum rescue—as measured by significantly lowerserum oestradiol and progesterone concentrations—was compromised.This study provided no evidence of any benefit of routinelysupplementing GnRHa/HMG cycles with oestradiol valerate in additionto intravaginal micronized progesterone.     

In-vitro fertilization and the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Eight patients who developed severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were identified among 1302 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) over a 1 year period (prevalence of 0.6%); 63% had ultrasonically diagnosed polycystic ovaries (PCO) and 75% were undergoing their first attempt at IVF. Pretreatment with a superactive luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue significantly increased the prevalence of severe OHSS (1.1% versus 0.2%, P less than 0.05) compared with ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). The mean serum oestradiol concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration was 8200 +/- 2300 pmol/l. A mean of 19.6 +/- 6.8 follicles had been aspirated and 13.1 +/- 7.7 oocytes recovered at transvaginal ultrasound-directed oocyte recovery. All patients had an embryo transfer and luteal support in the form of HCG. The clinical pregnancy rate was 88%, multiple pregnancy rate 71% and implantation rate 63.5 +/- 41.3%. In a group of seven patients who were hospitalized for moderate OHSS during the same period, peak oestradiol levels were significantly lower than in those with severe OHSS (P less than 0.05). Of the group with moderate OHSS, 57% had PCO, the clinical pregnancy rate was 100% and multiple pregnancy rate 43%. Patients with ultrasound-diagnosed PCO have an increased risk of developing OHSS and the dose of HMG administered to them should be minimized. In patients at risk of developing OHSS, progesterone instead of HCG should be used for luteal support. Transfer of a maximum of two embryos or freezing all embryos for transfer in a subsequent cycle may reduce the likelihood of multiple pregnancy.     

Endocrinology: Human chorionic gonadotrophin is a better luteal support than progesterone in ultrashort gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist/menotrophin in-vitro fertilization cycles

In an attempt to determine the best luteal support in in-vitrofertilization (IVF) cycles treated with gonadotrophin-releasinghormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)by the ultrashort protocol, 60 patients were prospectively randomizedfor either i.m. progesterone or human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) luteal support. The two groups did not differ in the meannumber of oocytes retrieved and embryos replaced, nor in themean age of the patients and the amount of HMG used. HCG maintainedhigher levels of oestradiol and progesterone during the lutealphase. Conception rate was significantly higher in the HCG group.We conclude that HCG is superior to i.m. progesterone as lutealsupport in IVF cycles in which GnRHa is used in the ultrashortprotocol.     

Endocrinology: Pre-ovulatory progesterone growth rate in patients treated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and outcome of in-vitro fertilization

The present study was undertaken to assess whether the increasein serum progesterone concentration following the administrationof human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) may have predictive valueon the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) success rate. Progesteroneconcentration on the day of HCG administration and the increasein progesterone concentration on the following day were evaluatedin 140 consecutive patients undergoing IVF with embryo transfer.Stimulation protocol in all study patients entailed intranasaladministration of short-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormoneagonist (GnRHa) buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin.A pregnancy rate of 37.2% was achieved when at least three embryoswere transferred. The only significant difference between conceptionand non-conception cycles was found in serum progesterone concentrationsafter HCG administration (P < 0.01), whereas the mean progesteroneconcentration on the day of HCG did not differ. No differencein other hormonal or cycle parameters was observed. The increasein progesterone concentration was significantly greater in thegroup of patients who achieved pregnancy than in the group whodid not (2.2 ± 0.2 versus 1.6 ± 0.1 ng/ml, respectively;P < 0.01). A critical breakpoint in serum progesterone wasarbitrarily determined at 1 ng/ml. An increase in progesteroneconcentration 1 ng/ml when three or more embryos were transferredwas associated with a positive predictive value for pregnancyof 40.4% (sensitivity of 94.7%), whereas a negative predictivevalue of 86.7% was obtained when this value was <1 ng/ml.These findings indicate that an adequate rise in serum progesteronefollowing HCG administration provides useful information aboutthe possible outcome of the treated cycle.     

Luteal support with micronized progesterone following in-vitro fertilization using a down-regulation protocol with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist: a comparative study between vaginal and oral administration.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of micronized progesterone administered as luteal support following ovulation induction for in-vitro fertilization (IVF)- embryo transfer in cycles using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, either orally (200 mgx4/day) or vaginally (100 mgx2/day) and to characterize the luteal phase hormonal profile during such treatments. A total of 64 high responder patients requiring intracytoplasmic sperm injection due to male factor infertility were prospectively randomized into two treatment groups. Patients treated orally or vaginally were comparable in age (31.9 +/- 6.1 versus 30.6 +/- 5.2; mean +/- SD), number of oocytes retrieved (17 +/- 8.2 versus 18 +/- 7.0), and number of embryos transferred (3.1 +/- 1.2 versus 2.7 +/- 0.9) per cycle. Following low dose vaginal treatment, a significantly higher implantation rate (30.7 versus 10.7%, P < 0.01), but similar clinical pregnancy rate (47.0 versus 33.3%) and ongoing pregnancy rate (41.1 versus 20.0%) was observed, compared with oral treatment. In conception cycles, luteal serum progesterone and oestrogen concentrations did not differ between the treatment groups. In non-conception cycles, late luteal progesterone concentrations were significantly lower following vaginal treatment. As low dose micronized progesterone administered vaginally is simple, easy and well tolerated, it could be recommended as the method of choice for luteal support, especially for high responder patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.     

A prospective randomized trial of human chorionic gonadotrophin or dydrogesterone support following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

A randomized, prospective blind study was carried out to investigate the need for luteal phase support in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). One-hundred-and-fifty-six patients undergoing IVF in cycles stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) stimulated IVF, were divided into three different groups for luteal phase treatment. Fifty-four patients received dydrogesterone three times daily (TID) beginning on the day of embryo transfer (ET). Fifty-one patients received HCG on days 3, 6 and 10 following ET. Fifty-one patients received placebo p.o. TID beginning on the day of ET. There was no difference between the groups in pregnancy rate, rate of spontaneous abortion, proportion of normally developing fetuses or rate of chemical pregnancy. The data indicate that supplementation of the luteal phase may not improve the success rates of IVF-ET cycles.     

A prospective randomized comparison of intramuscular or intravaginal natural progesterone as a luteal phase and early pregnancy supplement.

A luteal phase defect has been demonstrated in cycles stimulated using a protocol including a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa). We have conducted a randomized prospective study of luteal and early pregnancy supplementation in 262 women selected for in-vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) or zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT). Either intramuscular progesterone in oil (50 mg/day) or intravaginal micronized progesterone (600 mg/day) was used as luteal supplement. In association with oestradiol valerate, progesterone administration was initiated from the day before oocyte retrieval until the 12th week of pregnancy. The implantation rate just failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) in favour of the group receiving intravaginal progesterone. In the latter group, we observed a higher clinical pregnancy rate (33.6 versus 26.7%, not significant). Despite lower plasma progesterone levels, a lower first trimester abortion rate (P less than 0.05) was found in the intravaginally treated group. Intravaginal micronized progesterone was well tolerated by all patients and appeared more effective than intramuscular progesterone in improving the implantation rate, and in decreasing the incidence of abortions in stimulated cycles including GnRHa.     

The effect of adding oral oestradiol to progesterone as luteal phase support in ART cycles – a randomized controlled study

Introduction

Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles is still controversial. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of adding oral oestradiol to progesterone during ART cycles.

Material and methods

In this prospective case control study, infertile women under 35 years old who were candidates for IVF/ICSI cycles in Royan Institute were enrolled. A long gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol was used for ovarian stimulation. Patients were randomly divided into two groups for luteal phase support: the control group received vaginal administration of progesterone supplementation alone starting on the day after oocyte retrieval and continued until the tenth week if the chemical pregnancy test was positive. In the oestradiol group, 2 mg of oestradiol valerate was initiated orally with progesterone. The control group received a placebo instead of oestradiol.

Results

Ninety-eight women were studied as oestradiol (N = 47) and control groups (N= 51). There were no significant differences in the mean number of retrieved oocytes, number of transferred embryos, or chemical and clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups. Although the serum progesterone concentration was higher in the oestradiol group in comparison to the control group on day 7, 10 and 12 after embryo transfer, these differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

The results suggested that adding oral oestradiol to vaginal progesterone supplementation does not improve the chemical and clinical pregnancy rates of IVF/ICSI cycles.     

The effect of HCG supplementation after combined GnRH agonist/HMG treatment in an IVF programme

The necessity of luteal-phase supplementation in an IVF programme is of continuing interest. After ovarian stimulation with clomiphene and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), the beneficial effect of supporting the luteal phase has never been scientifically demonstrated. After ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonist/HMG, the luteal phase seems to be inadequate, but in a previous study we did not find evidence to support the need for oral progesterone supplementation. To evaluate the beneficial effect of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) supplementation, we performed a multicentre, double-blind, randomized study with HCG (193 transfers) against placebo (194 transfers). The ongoing pregnancy rate per transfer cycle was significantly better with HCG (18.7 versus 9.3). This is the first truly objective (randomized) study demonstrating the beneficial effect of supporting the luteal phase in an IVF programme.     

Ratio of oestradiol concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration to mid-luteal oestradiol concentration is predictive of in-vitro fertilization outcome.

The role of luteal oestradiol for successful implantation in humans seems to be permissive rather than obligatory. Few studies have attempted to clarify the role of early luteal oestradiol in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome, whether peri-implantation oestradiol is predictive of successful IVF outcome. We retrospectively analysed 106 women undergoing 106 IVF/embryo transfer cycles. Only the first treatment cycle per patient was analysed. Peak oestradiol denoted the concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Mid-luteal oestradiol was obtained 3 days after embryo transfer (8 days after HCG administration). A total of 44 pregnancies were noted (41.51%). There were no differences in age, cycle day 3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), peak oestradiol, number of retrieved oocytes, number of embryo transfers, and mid-luteal oestradiol between pregnant and non-pregnant women. However, the ratio of day of HCG oestradiol to mid-luteal oestradiol was highly predictive of successful outcome: the ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate (sacs with fetal heart beat/embryo transfer) were 15.8 and 5.7% respectively if the above ratio exceeded 5.0 (n = 19), compared to 42.1 and 16.3%, and 53.3 and 26. 5% if the ratio was between 0.4 and 2.5 (n = 57), and between 2.5 and 5.0 (n = 30) respectively. Our study suggests that the magnitude of decline in oestradiol concentrations after oocyte retrieval may be important in predicting IVF success. We postulate that endometrial integrity may become compromised when a dramatic drop in oestradiol occurs by the mid-luteal period. Whether these women benefit from oestradiol supplementation after oocyte retrieval remains to be investigated.     

Comparison of luteal phase profile in gonadotrophin stimulated cycles with or without a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to explore luteal phase hormone profiles in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles with or without gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist therapy during intrauterine insemination (IUI). Forty-one infertile couples were recruited in this randomized clinical study. METHODS: The 19 patients included in group A were treated for 21 cycles with recombinant FSH 150 IU/day starting from day 3 of the cycle and with the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix at the dose of 0.25 mg/day starting from the day in which a follicle with a mean diameter of > or =14 mm was seen at ultrasound scan. Cetrorelix was administered until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. The 22 patients included in group B were administered recombinant FSH alone at the same dosage for 27 cycles. RESULTS: The two treatment groups showed a similar increase in progesterone concentration during the luteal phase. In the mid-luteal phase (day 6 after HCG), oestradiol concentrations in group B were significantly higher compared with group A (P < 0.05) but the oestradiol:progesterone ratio was similar in the two groups. Serum LH was completely suppressed during the follicular phase only in group A, concomitantly with GnRH antagonist administration. A total of six pregnancies, all ongoing, were achieved (14.3% per patient and 12.2% per cycle), equally distributed in group A and in group B. CONCLUSION: GnRH antagonists can be safely administered in gonadotrophin-stimulated IUI cycles without luteal phase supplementation because no deleterious effects of GnRH antagonist administration were noted on luteal progesterone concentration or on the duration of the luteal phase.     

Luteal phase and clinical outcome after human menopausal gonadotrophin/gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist treatment for ovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

The luteal phase hormonal profile and the clinical outcome of 69 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) after ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) and the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist Cetrorelix were analysed. Twenty-four patients received Cetrorelix 0.5 mg (group I) while in 45 patients Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was administered (group II). Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was used as luteal support. Nine clinical pregnancies were obtained in group I (37.5%) and 12 in group II (26. 6%). These results were not significantly different. Serum progesterone and oestradiol concentrations did not differ between the two groups either in pregnant or non-pregnant patients. An expected decrease of the same hormones was observed 8 days after the pre-ovulatory HCG injection in non-pregnant women. With regard to serum luteinizing hormone concentrations, a decrease was observed 2 days after the pre-ovulatory HCG injection and was maintained at almost undetectable levels throughout the entire luteal phase in both conception and non-conception cycles of group I and group II. This study demonstrates that different doses of GnRH antagonist do not have any impact on the luteal phase of IVF/ICSI cycles when hormonal support is given.     

The luteal phase and early pregnancy after combined GnRH-agonist/HMG treatment for superovulation in IVF or GIFT

Endometrial biopsies showing inadequate development were observedafter ovarian stimulation with the GnRH agonist Buserelin andHMG for IVF or GIFT when luteal supplementation was omitted.Ninety-one patients were randomly allocated to two luteal supplementationregimens: in 41 women HCG and In 50 women progesterone and oestradiolvalerate. The pregnancy rate was similar for both supplementationregimens. In pregnant patients treated with a combination ofthe GnRH agonist and HMG a delay of implantation of 1.3 dayswas observed compared to pregnancies after domiphew citrate-HMGsthulation. This delay was not due to slower preimplantationembryo development after GnRH agonist-HMG treatment. Temporarilydefective function of the corpus luteum was evidenced by measuringserum progesterone, 17-oestradiol and 17-hydroxyprogesteronein the patients receiving progesterone and oestradiol valerate.This inadequate corpus luteum function could be related to theprolonged blockage of pituitary gonadotrophic function afterarrest of the GnRH agonist.