Randomized trial of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation

The optimal long-term regimen for immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients is unknown. We conducted a randomized trial involving 150 kidney transplant recipients to compare tacrolimus/sirolimus, tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclosporine/sirolimus. All patients received daclizumab induction and maintenance corticosteroids. Median follow-up was 8 yr post-transplant. Acute rejection (AR) occurred significantly less often among those treated with tacrolimus/MMF (12%) than among those treated with tacrolimus/sirolimus (30%) or cyclosporine/sirolimus (28%). Mean estimated GFR was consistently higher in the tacrolimus/MMF arm, especially after controlling for donor age in a multivariable model during the first 36 mo (P ≤ 0.008). The rate of dying with a functioning graft was significantly higher among those treated with tacrolimus/sirolimus (26%) than among those treated with tacrolimus/MMF (12%) or cyclosporine/sirolimus (4%). We did not observe significant differences in actuarial graft survival at 8 yr post-transplant between the groups. Patient noncompliance seemed responsible for 45% (13/29) of observed graft failures, with 11 of these occurring after 36 mo. Significantly more viral infections, protocol violations, and need for antilipid therapy occurred among patients receiving sirolimus, but we did not observe differences between the groups with regard to infections requiring hospitalization or new-onset diabetes. Taken together, these results suggest that maintenance therapy with tacrolimus/MMF is more favorable than either tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/sirolimus.     

Continued superior outcomes with modification and lengthened follow-up of a steroid-avoidance pilot with extended daclizumab induction in pediatric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids have been invariant transplant immunosuppressives with numerous adverse effects. We previously reported 6-month results in 10 patients using extended daclizumab induction to safely eliminate steroid use in pediatric renal transplantation. This expanded pilot series discusses immunosuppression dosing modification to further minimize drug toxicity without sacrificing regimen efficacy. METHODS: Fifty-seven pediatric renal transplant recipients were enrolled in the pilot steroid-free protocol. Extended daclizumab induction, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were intended maintenance drugs. Fourteen patients were equal to or younger than 5 years, and 43 patients were older than 5 years of age at transplantation. There were seven protocol breaks. Study patients underwent serial protocol transplant biopsies (n=246), and serum daclizumab and mycophenolic acid (MPA) trough levels were evaluated. In this efficacy study, controls were 50 historical-matched steroid-based children receiving tacrolimus with 100% 2-year graft survival and without delayed graft function. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 20 (range, 4.5-41) months with 98% overall graft and patient survival. At 1 year of analysis, steroid-free recipients showed significant improvements for clinical acute rejection (8%), graft function, hypertension, and growth, without increased infectious complications. Leukopenia, anemia, and allograft nephrotoxicity were addressed by solely decreasing MMF and tacrolimus dosing and/or by replacing MMF with sirolimus, without increasing acute rejection. Early daclizumab levels of more than 5 microg/mL were observed for the first time in children of all ages. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric renal transplantation is safe without steroids. Daclizumab first-dose doubling and extended use for 6 months replaces steroids effectively without evidence of overimmunosuppression and may be the pivotal cause for the reduced acute rejection seen in this trial. This pilot study provides preliminary data to test this protocol in a prospective, multicenter randomized study.     

A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 1 year

BACKGROUND: This is the 1-year report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. METHODS: Prior to transplantation, recipients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with either sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 6 months was the primary endpoint of the study. Patient and graft survival, renal function, study drug dosing and discontinuations were evaluated at 1 year. RESULTS: At 1 year, there was no difference in patient survival (95.7% sirolimus vs. 97.2% MMF; P=0.45) or graft survival (90.8% sirolimus vs. 94.3% MMF; P=0.22). Patients without delayed graft function (DGF) receiving MMF had significantly better graft survival (99% vs. 93%; P=0.01). Patients receiving a transplant from a live donor had a trend towards better graft survival with MMF as compared to sirolimus (98% vs. 91%; P=0.07). Patients receiving sirolimus had a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation (26.5% vs. 14.8% MMF; P=0.006). Patients receiving MMF had significantly better renal function as shown by median serum creatinine levels (1.3 mg/dL vs. 1.5 mg/dL; P=0.03) and a trend towards higher calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl), (58.4 ml/min vs. 54.3 ml/min; P=0.06). More patients in the sirolimus group had a serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, (20.4% vs. 11.0%; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus is safe and effective in live and deceased donor kidney transplantation when given in combination with sirolimus or MMF. Patient and graft survival were excellent in both arms. Renal function is superior for patients treated with tacrolimus + MMF combination.     

Steroid withdrawal or steroid avoidance in renal transplant recipients: focus on tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens

Steroid-induced adverse effects after transplantation include cosmetic, metabolic, and cardiovascular complications. Steroid withdrawal or avoidance with cyclosporine-based regimens have been hampered by an unacceptably high rate of acute rejections and increased rates of graft loss. Recently the results of several large, randomized trials of steroid withdrawal/avoidance with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients became available. A review of these trials appeared to be of clinical interest. Data from the THOMAS trial clearly indicate that steroid withdrawal from a regimen of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), steroids after 3 months after transplantation is safe with regard to acute rejection rate and graft survival. If an induction therapy with daclizumab is used in combination with tacrolimus and MMF (CARMEN trial), even steroid avoidance is safe with regard to acute rejection rate and graft survival. Finally, in the ATLAS trial, steroid avoidance with basiliximab in combination with tacrolimus (resulting in tacrolimus monotherapy) or alternatively with tacrolimus and MMF both resulted in similar graft survival, but higher rates of acute rejection. In conclusion, steroid withdrawal is safe from a triple-drug regimen of tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids after 3 months after transplantation, and steroid use may completely be avoided with tacrolimus, and MMF combined with daclizumab induction. Tacrolimus monotherapy may be achieved using basiliximab induction at the price of higher rates of acute rejection, but with unaffected graft survival. Thus tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with or without interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction has made steroid withdrawal or avoidance a realistic option in renal transplantation.     

Calcineurin inhibitor avoidance versus steroid avoidance following kidney transplantation: Postoperative complications

This study compared early postoperative complications in kidney transplant recipients treated with either a sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen or a tacrolimus-based steroid-free regimen. We used a single-center, prospective, sequential but nonrandomized study design. Consecutive recipients of primary cadaveric or non-HLA identical kidney transplant recipients received either a CNI-free regimen, consisting of sirolimus 5 mg daily beginning postoperative day 3, mycophenolate mofetil 1 gm twice a day, and methylprednisolone 500 mg intraoperatively, then prednisone 30 mg daily tapered to 10 mg daily at 3 months, or a prednisone-free regimen, consisting of methylprednisolone 500 mg, 250 mg, and 125 mg from days 0 to 2, then no further steroids, tacrolimus 0.075 mg/kg twice a day, and mycophenolate mofetil 1 g twice a day. All patients received thymoglobulin induction 6 mg/kg total dose. Outcome measures were patient and graft survival, BPAR, surgical and wound complications, viral infections and posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). Both groups had excellent early outcomes with no significant difference in patient or graft survival, early renal function, BPAR, surgical or wound complications, or viral infections between the two groups. Patients in the sirolimus-based CNI-free group had a significantly higher incidence of PTDM and a trend toward more discontinuation due to drug toxicity. Whether either regimen improves long-term outcomes awaits longer follow-up.     

A prospective study of rapid corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: comparison of two maintenance immunosuppression protocols: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus

BACKGROUND: We examined the feasibility of rapid corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation. METHODS: Forty consecutive simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective study in which antithymocyte globulin induction and 6 days of corticosteroids were administered along with tacrolimus and MMF (n=20) or tacrolimus and sirolimus (n=20). Mean+/-SD follow-up for recipients receiving tacrolimus/MMF and tacrolimus/sirolimus were 12.7+/-3.9 and 13.4+/-2.9 months, respectively. Patient and graft survival, and rejection rates were compared to an historical control group (n=86; mean follow-up 41.5+/-15.4 months) of SPK recipients that received induction and tacrolimus, MMF, and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics of recipient and donor variables were similar among all groups. The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the 40 SPK transplant recipients with rapid corticosteroid elimination were 100, 100, and 100%, respectively. In the historical control group the 1-year actual patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 96.5, 93.0, and 91.9%, respectively. The 1-year rejection-free survival rate recipients in the rapid steroid elimination group collectively was 97.5 vs 80.2% in the historical control group (P=0.034). At 6 and 12 months posttransplant the serum creatinine values remained stable in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that chronic corticosteroid exposure is not required in SPK transplant recipients receiving antithymocyte globulin induction and maintenance immuno-suppression consisting of either tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus and sirolimus.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 6 months

BACKGROUND: This is the first report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Results at 6 months of follow-up are presented. METHODS: Before transplantation, patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Patient and graft survival, renal function, and composite endpoints also were evaluated. Safety was assessed by monitoring laboratory parameters and adverse events. RESULTS: By 6 months of follow-up, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was similar in both treatment groups (13.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 11.4% tacrolimus+MMF; P=0.64 log-rank). Patient survival (97.3% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 97.7% tacrolimus+MMF) and graft survival (93.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 95.5% tacrolimus+MMF) were equivalent (P=0.53, overall survival log-rank). There was a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation in patients receiving sirolimus (21.1% vs. 10.8%; P=0.008). Renal function was significantly better in the MMF-treatment group (serum creatinine 1.44+/-0.45 mg/dL vs. 1.77+/-1.42 mg/dL; P=0.018). Hyperlipidemia was significantly more prevalent in the sirolimus-treatment group. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in sirolimus-treated patients. There were significantly more leukopenia and gastrointestinal adverse events in the MMF-treatment group. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 7.6% in the sirolimus group and 7.7% in the MMF group. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus is equally effective in renal transplantation when combined with sirolimus or MMF. The tacrolimus-MMF combination may be superior in terms of improved renal function and improved cardiovascular risk factors including hyperlipidemia and hypertension.     

Kidney transplantation with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression: 5-year results of a randomized prospective trial compared to calcineurin inhibitor drugs

BACKGROUND: We report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized prospective trial in primary adult renal allograft recipients, designed to evaluate calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppression on kidney transplant function. METHODS: Sixty-one patients were randomized to either sirolimus (n=31) or cyclosporine (n=30) after basiliximab induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with steroids. Sirolimus was concentration controlled at 10-12 ng/mL for at least 6 months. RESULTS: After 5 years, sirolimus-MMF-steroids compared to cyclosporine-MMF-steroids provides similar patient survival (87.1 vs. 90%, P=0.681), acute rejection rates (12.9 vs. 23.3%, P=0.22), total cholesterol (209.1 vs. 204.3 mg/dL, P=0.973), urine protein/creatinine ratios (0.398 vs. 0.478 mg/dL, P=0.72), and overall medical and surgical morbidity (P=NS). Although unadjusted patient survival was similar, sirolimus based CNI-free patients had longer death censored graft survival (96.4 vs. 76.7%, P=0.0265), higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the abbreviated Modified Diet in Renal Disease (66.7 vs. 50.7 cc/min, P=0.0075), and fewer graft losses from chronic allograft nephropathy. The Banff chronic scores at two years were strong predictors of 5-year GFR. At 5 years, there were six de novo (three solid organ, three skin) cancers in the CNI group and only two de novo (one skin, one leukemia, no solid organ) cancers in the sirolimus group (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: This study of low to moderate risk patients demonstrates that excellent 5-year kidney transplant outcomes can be achieved without CNI drugs, when therapeutic drug monitoring of sirolimus is employed. The application of CNI drug avoidance protocols to high-risk recipients (retransplants, highly sensitized, etc.), extrarenal allograft recipients, or alternative drug regimens such as steroid or MMF elimination should be subjected to controlled trials.     

Observations regarding the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Balancing the risk of acute rejection (AR) with drug-induced toxicities complicates the selection of the optimal immunosuppressive regimen, especially in the high-risk renal transplant recipient. This study was designed to determine the optimal dosage combinations of tacrolimus and sirolimus in a high-risk cadaveric renal transplant population. METHODS: Primary cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomly assigned to receive either standard tacrolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) plus reduced sirolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) (Group I) or to receive reduced tacrolimus (trough levels of 5-10 ng,mL) plus standard sirolimus (trough levels of 10-15 ng/mL) (Group II). All patients received Thymoglobulin induction and steroids. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (16 in Group I and 23 in Group II) high-risk renal transplant recipients (100% cadaveric donors, 79% African-American recipients, and 59% delayed graft function) are the subjects of this report. At 6 months, the patient survival rate was 94 and 100% and the graft survival rate was 94 and 83% in Groups I and II, respectively. The incidence of biopsy-proven AR was 6 and 5% in Groups I and II, respectively. Eight patients (50%) in Group I required discontinuation of tacrolimus, seven because of biopsy-proven tacrolimus nephrotoxicity and one secondarily to interstitial pneumonitis. Wound complications were the most frequent adverse event reported in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus was associated with a low risk of AR in this cohort of high-risk renal transplant recipients. However, 50% of patients who received standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination had to be discontinued from the regimen because of biopsy-proven nephrotoxicity. These preliminary results provide evidence that sirolimus should not be added to tacrolimus without dosage adjustments. We have discontinued recruitment of patients to the standard tacrolimus and reduced sirolimus combination and we have tightened our criteria for selection of marginal donor kidneys with our high-risk renal transplant recipients.     

Comparison of Sirolimus with Low-Dose Tacrolimus Versus Sirolimus-based Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Regimen in Live Donor Renal Transplantation

Between May 2001 and January 2003, 132 live donor renal allotransplant recipients were included in a prospective, randomized controlled trial where they were divided into two groups. All patients received steroids and basiliximab induction therapy. For maintenance immunosuppression, tacrolimus and sirolimus were used in group A. In group B, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus were utilized. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. One-year patient and graft survival rates were not significantly different between group A (96.9%, 92.3%) and group B (100%, 98.4%), respectively. However, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was less in group B but the difference was not statistically significant (13.5% vs. 18.5% in group A). Statistically significant better renal function was encountered among group B patients at two years post-transplantation as measured by serum creatinine (1.25 vs. 1.43 mg/dl; P = 0.017) and calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (94.9 vs. 79.6 ml/min; P = 0.005). One year protocol biopsies showed insignificant differences relative to chronic allograft damage index (CADI) between either group (Group A: 2.41 vs. Group B: 2.69; P = 0.436). Conclusion: Similar outcome was noted among patients in whom calcineurin inhibitors were not included in their immunosuppressive regimen. The long term impact of this observation on graft survival and function needs longer follow up.     

Outcome of sirolimus‐based immunosuppression,fifteen years post–live‐donor kidney transplantation: Single‐center experience

In a prospective randomized controlled trial, between May 2001 and January 2003, 132 live‐donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive sirolimus primary immunosuppression, either in combination with low dose tacrolimus (Tac group) or in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF group). We have previously reported on 2‐ and 5‐year follow‐up results, with favorable patient and graft outcomes obtained in both groups. In view of recent published reports of increased risk of inferior outcomes among sirolimus‐treated patients, we herein present results of an observational extension of the previously randomized patients 15 years post‐transplantation. Mortality rates were 10.8% and 3% in Tac and MMF groups respectively after mean follow‐up period of 11.2‐11.8 years. Comparable graft survival rates were obtained in both groups ranging from 60% to 62.7%. The (MMF) group continued to have the advantage of remaining on primary plan of immunosuppression (56.7% of patients) as well as to maintain better graft function in terms of serum creatinine level. Herein, we presented longest term published data for sirolimus‐based immunosuppression among live‐donor kidney transplants with favorable outcome in terms of survival and graft function.     

Calcineurin-inhibitor avoidance in elderly renal allograft recipients using ATG and basiliximab combined with mycophenolate mofetil

In old recipients of renal allografts from old donors, benefits of calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) are curtailed by nephrotoxicity. Intending to improve the outcome of these recipients, we analyzed a CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen consisting of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids. Kidney allograft recipients with low immunological risk (panel reactive antibodies <30%) were eligible for this study. Immunosuppression induction included ATG (4 mg/kg, day 0), basiliximab (20 mg, day 0 + 4) and steroids, followed by MMF (TL 2-6 microg/ml) and steroid maintenance treatment. Patient and graft survival rates respectively were 89.3% and 85.4% (12 months), and 86.6% and 76.8% (24 months). Delayed graft function occurred in 44.6%. S-creatinine at 12 months was 1.85 +/- 0.94 mg/dl. Thirty patients (53.6%) showed biopsy-proven rejections (6x Banff 3, 13x Banff 4I and 16x Banff 4II), 77% of which were steroid-sensitive, 23% required antibody treatment. After 12 months, 83% of the patients had an MMF-based immunosuppression, 43% were CNI-free. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections occurred in 28, tissue-invasive disease in three patients. Despite acceptable renal graft survival and function in some of patients with marginal organs, high incidences of rejections and CMV infections suggest the feasibility of CNI-avoidance using an MMF-based protocol only in carefully selected patients.     

Complete Avoidance of Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplantation: A Randomized Trial Comparing Sirolimus and Tacrolimus

Calcineurin inhibitors have decreased acute rejection and improved early renal allograft survival, but their use has been implicated in the development of chronic nephrotoxicity. We performed a prospective, randomized trial in kidney transplantation comparing sirolimus-MMF-prednisone to tacrolimus-MMF-prednisone. Eighty-one patients in the sirolimus group and 84 patients in the tacrolimus group were enrolled (mean follow-up = 33 months; range 13-47 months). At 1 year, patient survival was similar in the groups (98% with sirolimus, 96% with tacrolimus; p = 0.42) as was graft survival (94% sirolimus vs. 92% tacrolimus, p = 0.95). The incidence of clinical acute rejection was 10% in the tacrolimus group and 13% in the sirolimus group (p = 0.58). There was no difference in mean GFR measured by iothalamate clearance between the tacrolimus and sirolimus groups at 1 year (61 +/- 19 mL/min vs. 63 +/- 18 mL/min, p = 0.57) or 2 years (61 +/- 17 mL/min vs. 61 +/- 19 mL/min, p = 0.84). At 1 year, chronicity using the Banff schema showed no difference in interstitial, tubular or glomerular changes, but fewer chronic vascular changes in the sirolimus group. This study shows that a CNI-free regimen using sirolimus-MMF-prednisone produces similar acute rejection rates, graft survival and renal function 1-2 years after transplantation compared to tacrolimus-MMF-prednisone.     

Long-term,prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in de novo kidney transplant recipients: 5-year prospective follow-up of the ADHERE study patients

The objectives of this study were to assess long-term graft survival, patient survival, renal function, and acute rejections in de novo kidney transplant recipients, treated with once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus-based therapy. The study was a 5-year non-interventional prospective follow-up of patients from the ADHERE study, a Phase IV 12-month open-label assessment of patients randomized to receive prolonged-release tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arm 1) or sirolimus (Arm 2). From 838 patients in the randomized study, 587 were included in the long-term follow-up, of whom 510 completed the study at year 5. At 1 year post-transplant, graft and patient survival rates were 93.0% and 97.8%, respectively, and at 5 years were 84.0% and 90.8%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no association between graft loss, initial randomized treatment arm, donor age, donor type, or sex. The 5-year acute rejection-free survival rate was 77.4%, and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection-free survival rate was 86.0%. Renal function remained stable over the follow-up period: mean ± SD eGFR 4-variable modification diet in renal disease formula (MDRD4) was 52.3 ± 21.6 ml/min/1.73 m² at 6 months and 52.5 ± 23.0 ml/min/1.73 m² at 5 years post-transplant. These findings support the role of long-term once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, in combination with sirolimus or MMF, for renal transplant recipients in routine clinical practice.     

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization in the Symphony Study: Observational Results 3 Years after Transplantation

The Symphony study showed that at 1 year posttransplant, a regimen based on daclizumab induction, 2 g mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), low-dose tacrolimus and steroids resulted in better renal function and lower acute rejection and graft loss rates compared with three other regimens: two with low-doses of cyclosporine or sirolimus instead of tacrolimus and one with no induction and standard cyclosporine dosage. This is an observational follow-up for 2 additional years with the same endpoints as the core study. Overall, 958 patients participated in the follow-up. During the study, many patients changed their immunosuppressive regimen (e.g. switched from sirolimus to tacrolimus), but the vast majority (95%) remained on MMF. During the follow-up, renal function remained stable (mean change: −0.6 ml/min), and rates of death, graft loss and acute rejection were low (all about 1% per year). The MMF and low-dose tacrolimus arm continued to have the highest GFR (68.6 ± 23.8 ml/min vs. 65.9 ± 26.2 ml/min in the standard-dose cyclosporine, 64.0 ± 23.1 ml/min in the low-dose cyclosporine and 65.3 ± 26.2 ml/min in the low-dose sirolimus arm), but the difference with the other arms was not significant (p = 0.17 in an overall test and 0.077, 0.039 and 0.11, respectively, in pair-wise tests). The MMF and low-dose tacrolimus arm also had the highest graft survival rate, but with reduced differences between groups over time, and the least acute rejection rate. In the Symphony study, the largest ever prospective study in de novo kidney transplantation, over 3 years, daclizumab induction, MMF, steroids and low-dose tacrolimus proved highly efficacious, without the negative effects on renal function commonly reported for standard CNI regimens.     

Tacrolimus‐ versus sirolimus‐based immunosuppression after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: 5‐year results of a randomized trial

Tacrolimus, the cornerstone immunosuppression after simultaneous pancreas and ‐kidney (SPK) transplantation, may exert nephrotoxic and diabetogenic effects. We therefore prospectively compared in an open‐label, randomized, monocentric, 5‐year follow‐up study, a tacrolimus‐ and a sirolimus‐based immunosuppressive regimen. Randomization using the block method allowing a blind allocation was done at the time of surgery. All patients received anti‐thymocyte globulin and maintenance therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. At month 3, tacrolimus was continued or replaced by sirolimus. The primary endpoint was kidney and pancreas graft survival at 1 and 5 years. Fifty patients were included in the final analysis in each group. At 1 year, differences for kidney and pancreas graft survival between sirolimus and tacrolimus were 0% (90% confidence interval ?4.61% to 4.61%) and 6% (90% confidence interval ?6.32% to 18.32%), respectively. There was no difference in renal and pancreas graft survival at 5 years. Thirty‐four patients (68%) in the sirolimus group vs three (6%) in the tacrolimus group needed definitive withdrawal of the study drug. Despite noninferiority of sirolimus compared to tacrolimus for kidney and pancreas graft survival, the high rate of sirolimus discontinuation does not favor its use as cornerstone therapy after SPK transplantation (NCT00693446).     

A randomized trial of thymoglobulin vs. alemtuzumab (with lower dose maintenance immunosuppression) vs. daclizumab in renal transplantation at 24 months of follow-up

Abstract: Introduction:  A long-term prospective randomized trial evaluating alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, in a predominantly non-Caucasian population has yet to be reported.
Methods:  Ninety deceased donor (DD) first renal transplant recipients were randomized into three different antibody induction groups: group A, thymoglobulin (Thymo); group B, alemtuzumab; group C, daclizumab (Dac). In groups A and C, the target trough levels of tacrolimus were 8–10 ng/mL, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1 g administered twice daily, and maintenance methylprednisolone. In group B, target tacrolimus trough levels were 4–7 ng/mL, 500 mg MMF administered twice-daily, without methylprednisolone. African-Americans and Hispanics comprised more than 50% in each group.
Results:  A minimum follow-up of 27 months showed no overall group differences in patient or graft survival (p   = 0.89 and 0.66), but a trend towards worse death-censored graft survival in group B (p   = 0.05). Acute rejection rates were not significantly different: six (20%), seven (23%), and seven (23%) in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy was higher in group B than in A and C (p   = 0.008). The mean calculated creatinine clearance at 24 months was 81.1 ± 5.5, 64.4 ± 4.5, and 80.7 ± 5.7 in groups A, B, and C, respectively (p   = 0.01 for B vs. average of A and C).
Conclusion:  In this randomized 27-month minimum follow-up trial of predominantly non-Caucasian DD renal transplant recipients with alemtuzumab induction, lower maintenance tacrolimus, MMF, and steroid avoidance appear less effective than either Thymo or Dac with higher maintenance immunosuppression.     

A phase III prospective,randomized study to evaluate concentration-controlled sirolimus (rapamune) with cyclosporine dose minimization or elimination at six months in de novo renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of sirolimus plus steroids as a maintenance regimen with or without small-dose cyclosporine (CsA) adjunctive therapy in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: A total of 133 recipients of kidney allograft transplantations recruited in the United Kingdom and Ireland were enrolled into the study and are presented in this interim analysis. In the first 3 months, all patients received CsA plus sirolimus and small-dose steroids after transplantation. At 3 months, patients were randomized 1:1 to CsA elimination (e)CsA or CsA dose minimization (m)CsA. Dosing of agents was concentration-controlled and open label. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival were 97.7% and 95.5%, respectively (n = 133), whereas the biopsy-proven acute rejection rate in the first 6 months was 19.5% (26 episodes in 133 patients); incidents of acute rejection rates comprised 22 episodes (16.5%) during the first 3 months of the study and four episodes (3%) after randomization. Eighty-seven patients were randomized to receive eCsA or mCsA. At 6 months, creatinine clearance was significantly higher in the eCsA group versus mCsA group, respectively (65 mL/min vs. 57 mL/min; P = 0.027). There was no significant difference in serum cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, or high-density lipoprotein levels between the groups. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that withdrawal of CsA from a small-dose sirolimus maintenance regimen is safe and is associated with an improvement in renal function. The study also suggests that the addition of small-dose CsA to a sirolimus maintenance regimen does not increase immunosuppressive efficacy.     

Alemtuzumab (Campath 1H) induction with tacrolimus monotherapy is safe for high immunological risk renal transplantation

Immunosuppression for immunologically high-risk renal transplant patients usually involves antithymocyte globulin induction with triple drug maintenance therapy. Alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 antibody, has shown promise in tolerogenic induction protocols, requiring minimal maintenance immunosuppression. In this prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, we enrolled 21 high immunological risk patients (i.e., panel reactive antibody>20% or previous transplant). Patients received either single-dose alemtuzumab given before graft reperfusion, with tacrolimus monotherapy, or four doses of Thymoglobulin with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. Median follow-up was 377 days. One patient in the Thymoglobulin group who suffered primary graft nonfunction died. One-year cumulative graft survival was 85.7% for the alemtuzumab group and 87.5% for the Thymoglobulin group. Two alemtuzumab and three Thymoglobulin patients suffered rejection episodes. Infection rates were similar. Early results of this ongoing study indicate that a tolerogenic protocol with alemtuzumab induction and tacrolimus maintenance monotherapy is safe in immunologically high-risk renal transplant patients.     

Maintenance immunosuppression: new agents and persistent dilemmas

Since the approval of cyclosporine in 1983, only 3 drugs, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and sirolimus, have been approved for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients. All 3 agents decrease the incidence of early acute allograft rejection. An increase in intermediate and long-term graft survival has not been shown. However, survival data from these clinical trials should be interpreted with caution because the studies were not designed for this purpose. All 3 drugs have significant, albeit different, safety profiles. It remains to be seen whether, the lower incidence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia seen in tacrolimus-treated patients will reduce the incidence and severity of the cardiovascular disease experienced by renal transplant recipients. Sirolimus causes severe hyperlipidemia, and the long-term consequences both on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and on lipid-associated renal injury have yet to be determined. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil appear to increase graft survival in pancreas-kidney recipients but their efficacy in another high-risk group, African-American recipients, has not yet been clearly shown. However, the trend toward improved graft survival in African-American recipients treated with tacrolimus is encouraging. Steroid-withdrawal remains a goal in the posttransplant period. The available data from steroid-withdrawal and steroid-avoidance clinical trials are mixed. Steroid withdrawal can be achieved in about 50% of patients on a cyclosporine-based immunosuppression regimen. Steroid-withdrawal under coverage of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil or Neoral (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) may be more successful than that achieved in patients receiving Sandimmune (Novartis Pharmaceuticals). Further studies are needed in this area.