Correlation of abnormal response of left ventricular ejection fraction after exercise and left ventricular cavity-to-myocardium count ratio of technetium-99m-tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography in patients with coronary artery disease

The aim of this study was to assess the value of the left ventricular cavity-to-myocardium count ratio (C/M ratio) of technetium-99m (Tc-99m) tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to identify abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) responses after exercise in patients with coronary artery diseases (CAD). We studied 50 patients with recent CAD undergoing rest and exercise first-pass ventriculography to calculate LVEF and rest and exercise Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT to calculate left ventricular C/M ratios. Group A, consisting of 25 CAD patients with normal responses (increased LVEF> or =5% after exercise), had significantly higher rest and exercise C/M ratios than those of the group B, consisting of 25 CAD patients with abnormal responses (increased LVEF <5% after exercise) after exercise. However, the C/M ratios between exercise and rest did not differ significantly between groups A and B. In addition, there was significant correlation between LVEF and C/M ratios in all of the patients. C/M ratios of Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT are useful parameters for identifying patients with abnormal LVEF responses among patients with CAD.     

Reproducibility of the angiographic left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease

Quantitative analysis of the single and repeated cine left ventriculogram was performed in 20 patients with coronary artery disease to determine both the intrinsic variance of individual beats separated by different time intervals and variance between analyses of different observers. In addition, ventriculograms obtained from left ventricular injections of contrast medium prior to coronary arteriography were compared to ventriculograms obtained from either left ventricular or pulmonary artery injections after arteriography. The time period between studies varied from 30 minutes to 90 minutes to four days. Analysis of the same ventriculogram by different observers resulted in an average difference in ejection fraction of 0.05 (pNS). The average difference in ejection fraction was 0.02 between two early beats of the same ventriculogram (pNS). The average difference between sequential ventriculograms was 0.07 (pNS), but individual variations greater than 0.10 were not uncommon, particularly between studies done before and after arteriography, or several days apart. Patients exhibiting wide variance in ejection fractions between two studies either had wide variance in other hemodynamic measurements or degree of asynergy, or both. This study provides a frame of reference for analysis of sequential ventriculograms in patients with coronary artery disease, especially in evaluating changes in the state of the disease or the effects of therapy. It is especially important that: (1) standard hemodynamic measurements be made before ventriculography, (2) the same radiographic techniques repeated whenever possible, and (3) the same person analyze the two ventriculograms.     

Predictors of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

BACKGROUND: The frequency and determinants of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and reduced left ventricular (LV) function have not been thoroughly investigated. METHODS: The study population consists of 80 consecutive patients, invasively evaluated at our centre. Entry criteria were: LV ejection fraction < 45%; angiographic evidence of obstructive CAD; disease history of more than 3 months' duration. Exclusion criteria were: recent myocardial infarction and unstable angina. All patients underwent cardiac catheterization with coronary, LV and RV angiography. RV dysfunction was defined as a RV ejection fraction < 35%, which corresponds to the mean-three standard deviations of controls. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (81%) had multi-vessel disease and 57 (71%) had a previous myocardial infarction. Mean LV ejection fraction was 31 +/- 8%. Mean RV ejection fraction was 46 +/- 11%. Right ventricular dysfunction was present in 14 patients (18%). An occluded proximal right coronary artery was associated with significantly lower RV ejection fraction (38 +/- 12% versus 47 +/- 10%; P = 0.009) but not LV ejection fraction (30 +/- 8% versus 32 +/- 9%; P = 0.444). However, at multivariate analysis, only pulmonary hypertension was an independent significant predictor of RV dysfunction (P < 0.001; OR: 1.13; CI: 1.06 -1.22). CONCLUSION: Right ventricular dysfunction in patients with chronic ischaemic LV dysfunction is detected in less than 20% of cases. Proximal right coronary artery occlusion is associated with a reduced RV ejection fraction. However, the role of right coronary artery disease is overwhelmed by the haemodynamic burden of pulmonary hypertension, which represents the only independent predictor of RV dysfunction in our population.     

Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction is present in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or with congestive heart failure. HYPOTHESIS: This study was performed to evaluate the impact of systolic heart function on endothelial function in patients with CAD. METHODS: The study population consisted of 283 consecutive patients (mean age 59 years, 176 men) undergoing coronary angiography. Endothelial function was assessed by measuring flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. RESULTS: Patients (n = 236) with an ejection fraction (EF) > or = 55% on routine echocardiogram were younger (mean age 58 vs. 62 years), showed a lower prevalence of diabetes (15 vs. 38%) and myocardial infarction (13 vs. 66%), and showed a higher FMD (4.8 +/- 2.4 vs. 4.0 +/- 2.0%, p < 0.05) than patients (n = 47) with an EF < 55%. The correlation coefficient between FMD/endothelial function and EF/systolic heart function was 0.149 (p < 0.02) in the overall study population. Multivariate analysis showed that of age, gender, frequency of diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, and CAD extent, EF was the only significant independent parameter correlating with FMD in patients with CAD. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the other tested risk factors, EF surprisingly was the only significant independent parameter correlating with endothelial function in patients with CAD. Our results support the view that endothelial function is an independent prognostic factor in patients with CAD.     

Noninvasive prediction of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with coronary artery disease and preserved ejection fraction

Background

The aim of this study was to compare 3 different available methods for estimating left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) noninvasively in patients with coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (EF).

Methods

We used 3 equations for noninvasive estimation of LVEDP: The equation of Mulvagh et al., LVEDP₁ = 46 − 0.22 (IVRT) − 0.10 (AFF) − 0.03 (DT) − (2 ÷ E/A) + 0.05 MAR; the equation of Stork et al., LVEDP₂ = 1.06 + 15.15 × Ai/Ei; and the equation of Abd-El-Aziz, LVEDP₃ = [0.54 (MABP) × (1 − EF)] − 2.23. (Abbreviations: A, A-wave velocity; AFF, atrial filling fraction; Ai, time velocity integral of A wave; DT, deceleration time; E, E-wave velocity; Ei, time velocity integral of E wave; IVRT, isovolumic relaxation time; MABP, mean arterial blood pressure; MAR, time from termination of mitral flow to the electrocardiographic R wave; Ti, time velocity integral of total wave.)

Results

LVEDP measured by catheterization was correlated with LVEDP₁ (r = 0.52, P < 0.001), LVEDP₂ (r = 0.31, P < 0.05), and LVEDP₃ (r = 0.81, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The equation described by Abd-El-Aziz, LVEDP = [0.54 MABP × (1 − EF)] − 2.23, appears to be the most accurate, reliable, and easily applied method for estimating LVEDP noninvasively in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and an LVEDP < 20 mm Hg.     

The impact of coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction on the prognosis of patients with peripheral artery disease

The impact of the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the prognosis of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) has not been systematically studied. We retrospectively analysed 622 patients with PAD (intermittent claudication (IC): n = 446; critical limb ischaemia (CLI): n = 176). The association of SYNTAX score and LVEF with mortality was analysed using the Cox proportional hazard model. In patients with IC, a high SYNTAX score was significantly associated with mortality, whereas reduced LVEF was significantly associated with mortality in patients with CLI. The prognostic impact of CAD and LVEF appears different between patients with IC and CLI.     

Exercise echocardiography: detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal left ventricular wall motion at rest

Most studies investigating the ability of exercise two-dimensional echocardiography to identify patients with coronary artery disease have included patients with left ventricular wall motion abnormalities at rest. This has the effect of increasing sensitivity because patients with only abnormalities at rest are detected. To determine the diagnostic utility of exercise echocardiography in patients with normal wall motion at rest, 64 patients were studied with exercise echocardiography in conjunction with routine treadmill exercise testing before coronary cineangiography. All 24 patients who had no angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease had a negative exercise echocardiogram (100% specificity). Nine of 40 patients with coronary artery disease (defined as greater than or equal to 50% narrowing of at least one major vessel) also had a negative exercise echocardiogram (78% sensitivity). Of the nine patients with a false negative exercise echocardiographic study, six had single vessel disease. Among 25 patients with single vessel disease, exercise echocardiography was significantly more sensitive (p = 0.01) than treadmill exercise testing alone (76 versus 36%, respectively). Among 15 patients with multivessel disease, the two tests demonstrated similar sensitivity (80%). In conclusion, exercise echocardiography is highly specific and moderately sensitive for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with normal wall motion at rest. Although exercise echocardiography is significantly more sensitive than treadmill exercise electrocardiographic testing alone in patients with single vessel disease, the two tests are similar in their ability to detect coronary artery disease in patients with multivessel disease and normal wall motion at rest.     

Effects of anger on left ventricular ejection fraction in coronary artery disease.

This study examined the comparative potency of several psychological stressors and exercise in eliciting myocardial ischemia as measured by left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) changes using radionuclide ventriculography. Twenty-seven subjects underwent both exercise (bicycle) and psychological stressors (mental arithmetic, recall of an incident that elicited anger, giving a short speech defending oneself against a charge of shoplifting) during which EF, blood pressure, heart rate and ST segment were measured. Eighteen subjects had 1-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD), defined by greater than 50% diameter stenosis in 1 artery as assessed by arteriography. Nine subjects served as healthy control subjects. Anger recall reduced EF more than exercise and the other psychological stressors (overall F [3.51] = 2.87, p = .05). Respective changes in EF for the CAD patients were -5% during anger recall, +2% during exercise, 0% during mental arithmetic and 0% during the speech stressor. More patients with CAD had significant reduction in EF (greater than or equal to 7%) during anger (7 of 18) than during exercise (4 of 18). The difference in EF change between patients with CAD and healthy control subjects was significant for both anger (t25 = 2.23, p = 0.04) and exercise (t25 = 2.63, p = 0.01) stressors. In this group of patients with CAD, anger appeared to be a particularly potent psychological stressor.     

右冠状动脉狭窄程度对左冠状动脉狭窄患者左室射血分数的影响

目的研究右冠状动脉不同程度狭窄对左冠状动脉狭窄患者左室射血分数（LVEF）的影响。方法根据左冠状动脉病变部位不同,将1 000例左冠状动脉狭窄患者分为左前降支（LAD）狭窄,左回旋支（LCX）狭窄,左主干（LM）狭窄,左前降支+左回旋支（LAD+LCX）狭窄4个系列。每个系列再根据右冠状动脉（RCA）病变程度不同分为RCA正常组（直径狭窄<50%）、RCA非闭塞组（99%>直径狭窄≥50%）和RCA闭塞组（直径狭窄≥99%）,比较分析3组间LVEF的差异。结果在LAD,LCX,LM,LAD+LCX狭窄时,与RCA正常组LVEF相比,RCA非闭塞组LVEF分别下降0.9%,0.3%,3.4%和2.8%;RCA闭塞组LVEF分别下降10.9%,3.7%,6.5%和5.2%。LAD狭窄时,RCA非闭塞组和RCA闭塞组之间LVEF有统计学差异（P<0.01）。结论右冠状动脉病变可在左冠状动脉狭窄的基础上使左室射血分数进一步下降;当左冠状动脉狭窄为闭塞性病变时,影响更为明显。     

Effect of exercise on left ventricular ejection fraction in men with coronary artery disease.

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured at rest and during supine bicycle exercise in 31 men with arteriographically defined coronary disease and in 15 normal men. LVEF was calculated from a left ventricular time vs activity curve (collimated scintillation probe, 99m Technetium) as the fracitonal fall in count-rate divided by the background-corrected left ventricular end-diastolic count-rate. In normal men LVEF at rest averaged .59 +/- .06 (+/-SD) and during exercise was .72 +/- .08. LVEF did not increase with exercise in men with coronary disease (.55 +/- .03 to .57 +/- .03; N = 31; AVE +/-SEM; NS). In 17 men with coronary disease who had ST segment depression with exercise, LVEF either decreased or was unaltered in all (55 +/- .04 to .49 +/- .03; P less than 0.05); whereas in 14 without ST depression, LVEF increased in 10 (71 per cent) and was unaltered in 4 (29 per cent) (.54 +/- .04 to .66 +/- .04; P less than 0.01). Results suggest that LVEF during exercise normally increases, but in men with coronary disease LVEF either fails to increase or actually decreases. In addition there appears to be a relationship between ST segment changes during exercise and ejection fraction.     

Comparison of rest thallium-201 imaging and rest technetium-99m sestamibi imaging for assessment of myocardial viability in patients with coronary artery disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction

Objectives. We prospectively compared myocardial uptake of thallium-201 (²⁰¹Tl) at rest with rest technetium-99m (^99mTc) sestamibi uptake in the same patients, using quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

Background. Because of only slightly delayed redistribution, ^99mTc-sestamibi uptake at rest may be less than ²⁰¹Tl uptake, thereby underestimating the extent of viability.

Methods. Twenty patients (2.25 stenoses per patient) with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33 ± 2% underwent early and 3-h delayed rest ²⁰¹Tl SPECT, rest ^99mTc-sestamibi SPECT and two-dimensional echocardiography.

Results. The 280 scan segments were classified as either a normal, mild reduction in viability, defined as delayed ²⁰¹Tl uptake ≤75% and ≥5%, or a severe reduction in viability, defined as delayed ²⁰¹Tl uptake <50%. Mild and severe defects were further classified as fixed or having rest ²⁰¹Tl redistribution. Comparisons by patients were made using repeated measures analysis of variance and Dunnett's multiple comparisons test to compare ^99mTc-sestamibi with initial rest ²⁰¹Tl and delayed ²⁰¹Tl uptake. Twenty patients had at least one mild fixed defect (95 total segments). The average percent uptake in these defects for initial ²⁰¹Tl, delayed ²⁰¹Tl and ^99mTc-sestamibi was 62.5 ± 2.7%, 63.1 ± 7.1% and 67.3 ± 9.7%, respectively (p = NS). Twelve patients (27 segments) had mild redistribution defects on serial rest ²⁰¹Tl imaging. The average percent uptake was 61.6 ± 5.2% for initial ²⁰¹Tl, 67.0 ± 9.1% for delayed ²⁰¹Tl and 67.7 ± 12.4% for ^99mTc-sestamibi defects. Technetium-99m sestamibi uptake was not significantly different than that for delayed ²⁰¹Tl but was significantly greater than initial ²⁰¹Tl uptake. Seventeen patients (52 segments) had severe fixed ²⁰¹Tl defects. The average percent uptake was 38.9 ± 7.3% for initial ²⁰¹Tl, 38.3 ± 12.2% for delayed ²⁰¹Tl and 42.7 ± 14.2% for ^99mTc-sestamibi defects in these patients (p = NS). Ten patients (19 segments) had severe redistribution defects on rest ²⁰¹Tl imaging. The average percent uptake was 37.0 ± 8.5% for initial ²⁰¹Tl, 42.9 ± 8.6% for delayed ²⁰¹Tl and 44.5 ± 11.3% for ^99mTc-sestamibi defects. As was seen for mild ²⁰¹Tl redistribution defects, ^99mTc-sestamibi uptake was significantly higher than initial ²⁰¹Tl uptake, but not significantly different than delayed ²⁰¹Tl uptake in these severe defects.

Conclusions. Technetium-99m sestamibi uptake after injection at rest is comparable to ²⁰¹Tl uptake after injection at rest in patients with severe coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction, suggesting comparable worth for viability assessment.     

Early and subtle abnormalities of left ventricular function in clinically stable coronary artery disease patients with normal ejection fraction

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that, in the initial phase of ischemic cardiomyopathy, the earliest alterations of left ventricular function are detected during the relaxation phase. The aim of this study was to look for precocious abnormalities in the early stage of ischemic cardiomyopathy in both left ventricular systolic and diastolic phases. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using simultaneous left ventricular catheterization and echo-Doppler techniques, we studied both systolic and diastolic function in 44 (37 males and 7 females, mean age 55.7+/-8) normotensive, clinically stable, coronary artery disease patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction in comparison to 9 age- and sex-matched normal control subjects (7 males and 2 females, mean age 54.7+/-9). Mean values of E deceleration time, tau, left ventricular end-diastolic volume and pressure, and end-systolic volume and lowest diastolic pressure were significantly higher (from P<.05 to P<.01), whereas mean dP/dt/P values significantly lower (P<.05) in coronary artery disease patients than in controls. A strict relationship (P<.001) between dP/dt/P and tau, left ventricular lowest and end-diastolic pressure was found in all subjects studied. CONCLUSION: Early and subtle abnormalities in parameters of both systolic and diastolic function can be found in the majority of coronary artery disease patients with normal ejection fraction.     

Outcome of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction less than50% undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

正Objective To investigate the in-hospital and longterm outcomes of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)50%undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods From January to December 2013,10 445 consecutive patients who underwent PCI in Fuwai Hospital and the LVEF value was available were prospectively included.The patients were     

冠心病患者握力肺功能六分钟步行试验左心室射血分数的相关性研究

目的探讨冠心病患者握力、功能肺活量(FVC)、第一秒用力呼吸量(FEV1)、呼气峰流速(PEF)、6 min步行距离(6MWD)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)的相关性.方法回顾性收集2017年1月至2018年12月北京医院心内科住院的冠心病患者35例,年龄(70.4±10.6)岁,根据年龄分为非老年组(<65岁)8例,老年组(≥65岁)27例.人院后完成双手握力、6MWT和超声心动及简易肺功能FVC、FEV1和PEF检测.出院3个月后门诊复查上述指标,对两次结果进行比较,分析FVC、FEV1、PEF、6MWD、握力、LVEF的一致性和相关性.结果患者人院和出院后3个月FVC、FEV1、PEF、6MWD、左手握力、右手握力和LVEF比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05).Pearson二变量相关分析结果显示,FVC、FEV1、PEF、左手握力和右手握力间两两相关(均P<0.01).6MWD与LVEF无相关性(P>0.05).LVEF与FVC和FEV1相关(均P     

Two-dimensional echocardiographic estimation of right ventricular ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease

Two-dimensional echocardiographic determination of right ventricular ejection fraction was compared with right ventricular ejection fraction obtained by first pass radionuclide angiography in 39 patients with coronary artery disease. Apical four chamber and two chamber right ventricular views were obtained in 34 (87%) of the 39 patients, while a subcostal four chamber view was obtained in 31 patients (80%). Right ventricular ejection fraction by two-dimensional echocardiography was calculated by the biplane area-length and Simpson's rule methods using two paired orthogonal views and utilizing a computerized light-pen method for tracing the right ventricular endocardium. A good correlation (r = 0.74 to 0.78) was found between radionuclide angiographic and two-dimensional echocardiographic right ventricular ejection fraction for each method used. Patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction had the lowest right ventricular ejection fraction by radionuclide angiography and two-dimensional echocardiography (p less than 0.05 compared with patients with right coronary artery obstruction and no infarction). There were no differences in right ventricular ejection fraction between patients with acute and old inferior myocardial infarction by both techniques. No correlation was found between left and right ventricular ejection fraction by radionuclide angiography (r = 0.16). It is concluded that 1) right ventricular ejection fraction by two-dimensional echocardiography correlates well with radionuclide angiographic measurements and can reliably evaluate right ventricular function in coronary artery disease, 2) patients with inferior myocardial infarction have reduced right ventricular ejection fraction, and 3) changes in left ventricular ejection fraction do not directly influence right ventricular function.     

Comparison of two different methods for the evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease

The evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may be troublesome in difficult clinical settings in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to compare 2 simple geometrical and nongeometrical methods of LVEF evaluation that could overcome the typical technical limitations of ultrasound examination. The authors studied 26 patients with proven CAD (63+/-10 years) who underwent left ventricular (LV) catheterization and coronary angiography during the hospital stay. A complete 2D-Doppler echocardiography was performed and LVEF was evaluated with the formula by Wyatt (W-LVEF), which relates the left ventricle to a biplane ellipsoidal figure, and by the myocardial performance index (MPI) formula (MPI-LVEF), MPI being an index of systodiastolic function. Mean MPI-LVEF was 41+/-8% and was significantly lower with respect to contrast angiography (52+/-14%, p = 0.0003) and to W-LVEF (49+/-13%, p = 0.0009). There was no statistically significant correlation between MPI-LVEF and geometric (either angiographic or ultrasound) LVEF. Bland-Altman analysis showed lack of agreement between MPI-LVEF and any other method evaluated in the study. MPI-LVEF may not be reliable and accurate for the evaluation of systolic function in patients with CAD. Nonetheless, the evaluation of global LV function by means of MPI may represent a valuable and affordable alternative to expensive and time-consuming methods, especially in the presence of difficult technical settings.