Dynamic exercise therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of dynamic exercise therapy in improving joint mobility, muscle strength, aerobic capacity and daily functioning in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In addition, possible unwanted effects such as an increase in pain, disease activity and radiological progression were studied. A computer-aided search of the MEDLINE, Embase and SCISEARCH databases was performed to identify controlled trials on the effect of exercise therapy. Randomized trials were selected on the effect of dynamic exercise therapy in RA patients with an exercise programme fulfilling the following criteria: (a) intensity level such that heart rates exceeded 60% of maximal heart rate during at least 20 min; (b) exercise frequency > or = 2 a week; and (c) duration of intervention > or = 6 weeks. Two blinded reviewers independently selected eligible studies, rated the methodological quality and extracted data. Six out of 30 identified controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Four of the six included studies fulfilled > or = 7/10 methodological criteria. Because of heterogeneity in outcome measures, data could not be pooled. The results suggest that dynamic exercise therapy is effective in increasing aerobic capacity and muscle strength. No detrimental effects on disease activity and pain were observed. The effects of dynamic exercise therapy on functional ability and radiological progression are unclear. It is concluded that dynamic exercise therapy has a positive effect on physical capacity. Research on the long-term effect of dynamic exercise therapy on radiological progression and functional ability is needed.      

Combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

It has become clear that early suppression of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity is important in preventing progressive joint destruction and functional decline. To achieve this goal, many rheumatologists today advocate a more aggressive approach, using combinations of classic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-often including methotrexate-or new drugs. During the last 2 years, the combination of methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and prednisolone has been demonstrated to be more beneficial than monotherapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, the superior efficacy of the combination of new tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking agents plus methotrexate to methotrexate alone in patients with chronic disease is very promising. Most studies of combination therapy focus on the efficacy of a combination compared with monotherapy, rather than on the efficacy of a treatment strategy. Although these studies of combination therapy provide useful information about the possible synergistic action of combinations of drugs, many questions remain unanswered, and studies evaluating different treatment strategies are needed before a new approach can be suggested.     

Combination therapy for rheumatoid arthritis

What can be expected from combination therapy? What is the goal of combination therapy? What criteria allow drug selection? Is combination therapy regularly used for controlling rheumatoid arthritis? What combination therapies have been assessed with clinical trials? What is the contribution of prolonged combination therapy? Conclusion     

Tai chi for rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review

The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate data from controlled clinical trials testing the effectiveness of tai chi for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Systematic searches were conducted on Medline, Pubmed, AMED, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1, the UK National Research Register and ClinicalTrials.gov, Korean medical databases, Qigong and Energy Medicine Database and Chinese databases up to January 2007. Hand-searches included conference proceedings and our own files. There were no restrictions regarding the language of publication. All controlled trials of tai chi for patients with RA were considered for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad score. The searches identified 45 potentially relevant studies. Two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and three non-randomized controlled clinical trials (CCTs) met all inclusion criteria. The included RCTs reported some positive findings for tai chi on disability index, quality of life, depression and mood for RA patients. Two RCTs assessed pain outcomes and did not demonstrate effectiveness on pain reduction compared with education plus stretching exercise and usual activity control. The extent of heterogeneity in these RCTs prevented a meaningful meta-analysis. Currently there are few trials testing the effectiveness of tai chi in the management of RA. The studies that are available are of low methodological quality. Collectively this evidence is not convincing enough to suggest that tai chi is an effective treatment for RA. The value of tai chi for this indication therefore remains unproven.     

Acupuncture for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the available evidence, from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), of acupuncture for treating patients with RA. Systematic searches were conducted on 17 databases up to April 2008 without the language restriction. All RCTs of acupuncture, with or without electrical stimulation or moxibustion, for patients with RA were considered for inclusion. A total of 236 potentially relevant studies were identified and eight RCTs were included. Four RCTs compared the effects of manual or electro-acupuncture with penetrating or non-penetrating sham acupuncture and failed to show specific effects of acupuncture on pain [n = 88; weighted mean differences (WMD), 10 cm VAS -0.46; 95% CI -1.70, 0.77; P = 0.46; heterogeneity: tau(2) = 0.19; chi(2) = 2.38; P = 0.30; I (2) = 16%] or other outcome measures. One RCT compared manual acupuncture with indomethacin and suggested favourable effects of acupuncture in terms of total response rate. Three RCTs tested acupuncture combined with moxibustion, vs conventional drugs and failed to show that acupuncture plus moxibustion was superior to conventional drugs in terms of response rate (n = 345; RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.99, 1.28; P = 0.08; heterogeneity: tau(2) = 0.00; chi(2) = 1.34; P = 0.51; I(2) = 0%), pain reduction (n = 105; WMD, 10 cm VAS 1.53; 95% CI -0.57, 3.63; P = 0.15; heterogeneity: tau(2) = 1.18; chi(2) = 1.81; P = 0.18; I(2) = 45%) or joint swelling index (n = 105; WMD, 10 cm VAS 0.25; 95% CI -1.31, 1.82; P = 0.75; heterogeneity: tau(2) = 0.18;chi(2) = 1.14; P = 0.28; I(2) = 13%). In conclusion, penetrating or non-penetrating sham-controlled RCTs failed to show specific effects of acupuncture for pain control in patients with RA. More rigorous research seems to be warranted.     

Economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the state of knowledge with regard to the economic impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to highlight any weaknesses in the work conducted to date, so as to inform future RA cost-of-illness studies. METHODS: Four computerized literature databases were searched to identify all the literature relevant to this review. Seven elements indicating a quality cost-of-illness study were established and used to appraise the literature identified critically. Where possible, costs reported by the different studies were converted to 1996 US dollars using the consumer price index for medical care. RESULTS: Total average medical costs were reported to range from US$5720 (UK pound3575) to US$5822 (UK pound3638). Medication constituted between 8 and 24% of total medical costs, physician visits between 8 and 21%, and in-patient stays between 17 and 88%. The average number of days absent from work due to a person's RA was reported to range from 2.7 to 30 days/year. CONCLUSION: The economic impact of RA in terms of cost was reported to be substantial by all studies reviewed. However, methodological problems meant that discrepancies in the average (per person) annual cost of RA existed across studies.     

Ayurvedic medicine for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of Ayurvedic medicine for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Computerized literature searches for all RCTs of Ayurvedic medicine for RA in the following databases: Medline (March 1969 to March 2003), Embase (February 1985 to February 2003), AMED (March 1980 to March 2003), Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (October 1997 to March 2003), and the abstract service of Central Council for Research in Ayurveda and Siddha (CCRAS; 1976 to March 2003). Hand searches were performed in 1 Sri Lankan and 3 Indian journals and the authors' personal files. Key data of included studies were extracted and reviewed. The methodological quality of all studies was evaluated with the Jadad scale. RESULTS: Seven studies met our inclusion criteria. Trials tested either Ayurvedic medicine against placebo or other Ayurvedic medicines. In general, patient and physician global assessments on the severity of pain, and morning stiffness were used as endpoints. Of 3 placebo-controlled RCTs, 1 high-quality trial did not show benefit of the active treatment against placebo, while another incompletely reported study indicated beneficial effects of an Ayurvedic medicine. A further incompletely reported study showed no significant difference. The remaining 4 trials were difficult to interpret because they tested an Ayurvedic medicine against other Ayurvedic medicines whose effects were not proven. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of RCTs of Ayurvedic medicines for RA. The existing RCTs fail to show convincingly that such treatments are effective therapeutic options for RA.     

Psychosocial interventions as adjunct therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

Aim: To identify the psychological interventions for which there is consistent, high quality evidence of efficacy in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Method: A computer‐aided search and manual screening of identified papers was conducted. Randomised controlled trials published in English in peer‐reviewed journals, assessing the use of psychological interventions in adult patients with RA were included. Results: Thirty‐four papers published between 1981 and 2009 encompassing 31 studies with 2021 patients were included. There is consistent supportive evidence for the efficacy of disclosure therapy (four studies) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with maintenance therapy (five studies). There is supportive evidence for improvement with CBT of greater than 6 weeks duration (six studies) in the short‐term but conflicting evidence for its long‐term efficacy. There is some evidence for improvement with biofeedback‐based interventions (two studies). There is conflicting evidence for the benefits of counselling (three studies), psychotherapy (two studies) mindfulness and meditation (two studies), and CBT of less than 6 weeks duration (six studies). There is limited evidence regarding relaxation therapy (two studies). Methodological limitations of the reviewed literature included failure of allocation concealment, blinding and conduction of intention‐to‐treat analysis, as well as the heterogeneity and choice of outcome measures. Conclusions: This review shows consistent supportive evidence for the use of disclosure therapy, and CBT with maintenance therapy as adjunct therapies in patients with RA. It also highlights methodological limitations in the current literature and the need for future research in this area.     

Biological therapy in rheumatoid vasculitis: a systematic review

Clinical Rheumatology - Rheumatoid vasculitis (RV) is one of the most severe extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis, with significant morbidity and mortality, requiring aggressive...     

Interventions for foot disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review medical and surgical foot intervention studies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), focusing on clinical efficacy, study quality, and risk of harm. METHODS: We searched appropriate databases using a combination of the terms "rheumatoid arthritis" and "foot" against terms indicating treatment; we also hand-searched references. We selected articles in English (1968-2003) comprising randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), prospective observational studies, and large retrospective observational surgical studies (> 50 cases). RCT quality was examined using Jadad scoring; other designs were assessed qualitatively. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 33 of 894 identified studies, comprising 5 RCTs and 1 CCT (all nonsurgical), 15 prospective observational studies (8 nonsurgical, 7 surgical), and 12 large retrospective studies (all surgical). Functional, custom-designed and semirigid orthoses and extra-depth shoes were effective in single RCTs of variable quality; no comparative studies have been conducted. This finding was supported by a CCT and prospective observational studies. There was no evidence of harm. There were no controlled trials of surgery. Prospective observational studies suggest that forefoot arthroplasty and first metatarsophalangeal joint implants, but not plantar callous debridement, are effective. Comparative retrospective analyses suggest that some procedure variants may be better, and surgery may relieve pain better than orthoses. Infection was the main risk. CONCLUSION: RCT evidence shows that orthoses and special shoes are likely to be beneficial in patients with RA. The only evidence of benefit from surgery comes from observational studies, because no RCTs have been conducted. Further RCT evidence is needed, although well-designed observational studies may be helpful.     

Toll-like receptor polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

The aim of this study was to determine whether toll-like receptor (TLR) polymorphisms confer susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and influence the clinical characteristics of RA. The authors conducted a systematic review on associations between TLR polymorphisms and RA susceptibility and clinical findings. Meta-analysis was performed if at least three comparisons of an issue were available. A total of 14 studies were included in this systematic review, which included European and Asian studies. Meta-analysis of five European studies showed no association between the TLR4 Asp299Gly (rs4986790) polymorphism and RA (OR for the minor allele = 0.907, 95 % CI = 0.755–1.088, p = 0.291). Furthermore, none of these studies found any association between the polymorphism and clinical characteristics. A significant difference between TLR9 rs187084 allele frequencies in RA patients and controls was found in one Turkish study (p = 0.003), and a moderate association between RF positivity and TLR8 rs5741883 was found in an European study (p = 0.001). The numbers of guanine–thymine [(GT)_n] repeats in intron II of the TLR2 gene were found a significantly higher S-allele frequency in Korean patients with RA than in controls (30.3 vs. 23.0 %, p = 0.03). This meta-analysis shows lack of an association between the TLR4 Asp299Gly polymorphism and RA. However, our finding suggests the possibility that TLR polymorphisms are associated with the development and clinical characteristics of RA. Because of a paucity of data of the TLR polymorphisms, case–control studies are required to determine whether TLR2, 4, 8, 9 polymorphisms contribute to RA susceptibility or severity in more than 2,000 patients and controls.     

Custom foot orthoses for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review

Objective

To identify and critically appraise the evidence for the effectiveness of custom orthoses for the foot and ankle in rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods

Studies were identified in appropriate electronic databases (from 1950 to March 2011). The search term “rheumatoid arthritis” with “foot” and “ankle” and related terms were used in conjunction with “orthoses” and synonyms. Included studies were quantitative longitudinal studies and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case–control trials, cohort studies, and case series studies. All outcome measures were investigated. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria with additional criteria for sample population representativeness, quality of statistical analysis, and compliant intervention use and presence of cointerventions. Meta‐analyses were conducted for outcome domains with multiple RCTs. Qualitative data synthesis was conducted for the remaining outcome domains. Levels of evidence were then assigned to each outcome measure.

Results

The inclusion criteria were met by 17 studies. Two studies had high quality for internal validity and 3 studies had high quality for external validity. No study had high quality for both internal and external validity. Six outcome domains were identified. There was weak evidence for custom orthoses reducing pain and forefoot plantar pressures. Evidence was inconclusive for foot function, walking speed, gait parameters, and reducing hallux abductovalgus angle progression.

Conclusion

Custom orthoses may be beneficial in reducing pain and elevated forefoot plantar pressures in the rheumatoid foot and ankle. However, more definitive research is needed in this area.     

Predictors for remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A systematic review

Objective

To summarize the potential predictors of remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

We performed a systematic review of prognostic studies that identified the predictors of remission in RA patients. Studies were identified in Medline, EMBase, and the Cochrane Registry, and by hand search. We included only studies performing multivariate analysis.

Results

A total of 18 studies from 2,062 citations were included. The following variables were found to be the independent predictors of RA remission: male sex; young age; late‐onset RA; short disease duration; nonsmoker; low baseline disease activity; mild functional impairment; low baseline radiographic damage; absence of rheumatoid factor and anti–citrullinated peptide; low serum level of acute‐phase reactant, interleukin‐2, and RANKL at baseline; MTHFR 677T alleles and 1298C alleles in the methotrexate (MTX)–treated patients; magnetization transfer ratio 2756A allele ± either the SLC 19A180A allele or the TYMS 3R‐del6 haplotype in the MTX plus sulfasalazine combination–treated patients; early treatment with nonbiologic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) combinations; the use of anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF); the concurrent use of DMARDs in anti‐TNF–treated patients; and moderate or good response to treatments at the first 6 months. The magnitude of the association in the individual predictor was diverse among the studies depending on the patient characteristics, the study characteristics, and the variables used to adjust for in the models.

Conclusion

A number of independent predictors of remission, i.e., baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics and genetic markers, were summarized. The predictive value of prognostic factors recently identified needs to be confirmed.