首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
目的探讨急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠脉介入治疗(PCI)预后的性别差异.方法比较2004年11月~ 2005年6月间行PCI治疗的ACS患者(女性61例,男性113例)的临床及冠脉病变特点、即刻手术成功率、住院期间及3个月主要心脏不良事件(MACE)发生率.结果女性组合并高龄、高血压病的比例高于男性组,而主动吸烟、外周血管疾病发生率较低 (均P<0.01).冠脉造影显示,女性组冠脉病变累及前降支者较男性多(50.6% vs 36.1%,P<0.05),其他病变两组间未见显著性差异.女性组PCI即刻成功率为93.7%,与男性组(94.1%)无统计学差异(P>0.05).住院期间MACE发生率两组无显著性差异(11.4% vs 8.8%,P>0.05);3个月时MACE发生率女性组高于男性组(39.8% vs 21.0%,P<0.05);经多元回归分析校正年龄等因素后,性别不是预测ACS患者PCI治疗临床预后的独立危险因素(P=0.32).结论 ACS患者临床和冠脉病变特征存在性别差异,但性别不是影响ACS患者介入治疗后短期预后的独立危险因素.  相似文献   

2.
俞燕  章秀清  王卫忠 《现代实用医学》2013,25(5):512-513,599
目的探讨急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠脉介入治疗术(PCI)前后血浆心型脂肪酸结合蛋白(H-FABP)水平及对术后心肌损伤和预后的预测价值。方法留取169例ACS患者胸痛症状发作6~10 h的PCI术前血标本,酶联免疫法测定H-FABP,入选患者按H-FABP(<11.82 g/L和≥11.82 g/L)浓度进行分组。记录Gensini冠脉病变评分,并观察ACS患者PCI术后30 d心源性死亡和主要心脏不良事件(MACE)发生率。结果 H-FABP水平与冠脉病变支数和Gensini冠脉病变评分均呈正相关(=0.754、0.842,<0.05);2组术后30 d的MACE发生率为11.49%和4.88%(>0.05)。多变量逐步Logistic回归分析表明,H-FABP、UA和左主干病变是ACS患者PCI后30d发生MACE的危险因素(均<0.05)。结论 H-FABP水平变化有助于早期识别PCI术后心肌损伤,PCI术前H-FABP水平升高是ACS患者PCI术后再发MACE的独立危险因素。  相似文献   

3.
女性高危急性冠脉综合征早期PCI预后分析   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
目的:探讨女性高危急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的预后是否与男性有差别。方法:分析24 h内接受PCI治疗的79例女性高危ACS患者冠脉病变及干预情况,记录手术成功率及随访期间终点事件发生率,并与同期133例男性患者作对照。结果:女性患者平均年龄较男性为高(P<0.01),较少吸烟(P<0.01),较多合并糖尿病(P<0.05)和高脂血症(P<0.05),三支病变较少(P<0.05),而手术成功率及(25.3±8.1)个月心血管事件发生率与男性组无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:早期PCI治疗高危ACS其院内疗效与长期预后无性别差异。  相似文献   

4.
急性冠脉综合征患者介入治疗后生存时间的性别差异   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
目的: 比较急性冠脉综合征(ACS)经皮冠脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的特征、处置与死亡率在性别方面的差异.方法: 收集2001-2005年ACS行PCI 142例男性和78例女性患者资料并随访至2006年,比较患者的特征、处置与死亡率在性别方面的差异.结果: 在随访期有17例(11.97%)男性和13例(16.67%)女性患者死亡.单因素分析显示女性有较高的死亡率(风险率1.47,95% CI为1.22~1.73,P<0.01),但经过年龄、肥胖、吸烟、并存疾病、心血管病病史、糖尿病、高血压和情感抑郁等多因素调整后无差异(风险率1.05,95%CI为0.86~1.21,P>0.05).同样PCI后1月内女性有较高的死亡率(风险率1.55,95%CI为1.27~1.86,P<0.01),但经过上述多因素调整后无差异(风险率1.05,95%CI为0.82~1.31,P>0.05).分析男女组别PCI情况,发现两组病变血管、支架数目、支架直径、即刻成功率及术中并发症差异均无显著性( 均P >0. 05).结论: 结果与有关ACS行PCI后女性预后差的报道有所不同.差别的主要原因在于患者的年龄、处置和多因素的影响,提示如果女性患者能及时得到相同的处置则生存率将与男性相同.  相似文献   

5.
目的;探讨性别对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)介入治疗预后的影响。方法:分析比较363例ACS患者(男性244例。女性119例)的临床和冠脉造影病变特征、介入成功率、院内和随访(22±13)个月主要心脏不良事件(MACE)的发生率。结果:男性多支病变的比例较高,侧支循环较多,而女性双支病变的比例较高.钙化病变多。两组介入成功率(91.4% vs 94.1%,P=0.361)。院内MACE(5.7% vs 5.9%,P=0.956)和随访期间MACE(13.3%vs 13.4%,P=0.982)相似。结论本研究中性别不是影响ACS介入治疗近期和远期预后的重要因素。  相似文献   

6.
目的 分析急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术中选择性靶血管内注射小剂量替罗非班和尿激酶对梗死相关血管冠脉血流(TIMI)和近期预后的影响.方法 选择我院2012年1月至2014年10月行STEMI急诊PCI术患者125例,根据PCI术中是否选择性靶冠脉内注射小剂量替罗非班和尿激酶分为A组(非注药组,60例)和B组(注药组,65例).比较两组患者PCI术后梗死相关血管的TIMI分级、出血并发症发生率、1个月时左室射血分数(LVEF)和6个月时主要心血管事件发生率(MACE).结果 B组患者PCI术后TIMI 3级血流获得率明显高于A组(96.9%vs 90.6%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1个月B组患者LVEF高于A组[(56.3±8.6)vs(51.2±8.7)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);6个月后MACE低于A组(3.1%vs 8.3%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);轻中度出血并发症发生率高于A组(9.2%vs 8.4%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 STEMI急诊介入治疗中选择性靶血管内注射小剂量替罗非班和尿激酶明显改善PCI术后的冠脉血流、LVEF及近期临床预后.  相似文献   

7.
目的探讨代谢综合征中各组成部分在早发急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中的性别差异,以及性别和代谢异常因素对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)早发ACS患者长期预后的影响。方法采用前瞻性队列研究。连续纳入2013年1-12月行PCI治疗的ACS患者共6431例,选取≤50岁男性(n=1154,男性组),≤60岁的女性(n=404,女性组)。收集并分析2组的基线资料和5年的随访资料。结果男性组合并代谢综合征的比例高于女性组,其中肥胖(32.2%比23.5%)、高甘油三酯(TG)血症(54.0%比45.0%)和低高密度脂蛋白(HDL-C)血症(73.2%比34.7%)的比例显著高于女性组(P<0.001或P=0.002)。多因素回归分析显示,肥胖(OR=1.650,P<0.001)、高TG血症(OR 1.592,P<0.001)和低HDL-C(OR=1.707,P<0.001)与男性早发ACS呈正相关;而冠心病家族史与女性早发ACS呈正相关(OR=1.535,P=0.003)。5年随访结果显示,2组主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE)的发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素COX回归分析显示,糖尿病(HR=1.851,P=0.006)、低HDL-C血症(HR=2.146,P=0.001)和术前SYNTAX评分(HR=1.030,P=0.001)是男性早发ACS患者发生MACCE的独立危险因素;高TG血症(HR=2.082,P=0.010)是女性患者发生MACCE的独立危险因素。结论早发ACS患者合并代谢综合征存在性别差异,肥胖、高TG血症和低HDL-C等代谢异常与男性早发ACS有关,而冠心病家族史则与女性早发ACS相关。代谢异常是早发ACS患者PCI术后不良事件的预测因素。  相似文献   

8.
目的:探讨N端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)对非肥胖急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)经皮冠脉介入(PCI)术后主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的预测价值。方法 :因ACS行PCI手术的非肥胖患者101例,分为低NT-proBNP水平组(NT-proBNP≤80 pg/ml)31例,高NT-proBNP水平(NT-proBNP>80 pg/ml)组70例,统计并分析患者PCI术后6个月内MACE发生率。结果:高NT-proBNP水平组PCI术后MACE发生率高于低NT-proBNP水平组;NT-proBNP可独立预测非肥胖ACS患者PCI术后MACE发生率、死亡率、和心衰的发生率。结论:血浆NT-proBNP水平可用于评估非肥胖ACS患者冠脉病变的范围PCI术后短期(6个月内)的预后。  相似文献   

9.
目的:探讨入院即刻肌酐水平对急性心梗患者经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗预后的影响。方法:对395例急性心梗并于12h内行PCI治疗患者按照入院即刻肌酐水平分为血肌酐升高组和正常组,比较两组患者短期观察和长期随访结局,并对长期随访不良结局的影响因素进行Logistic回归分析。结果:两组患者住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),血肌酐升高组死亡人数和肌酐值均高于正常组(P<0.05),主要心脏不良事件(MACE)发生率血肌酐升高组高于正常组但两者差异并无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后随访,两组患者死亡人数、MACE发生率和随访期终点肌酐水平差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);将患者死亡和出现MACE作为不良结局分析发现,年龄、糖尿病史、高血压史、陈旧性心梗史、Killip p≥2、血管病变程度≥2、eGFR和入院即刻肌酐水平均为不良结局的影响因素(P<0.05);对影响患者结局的各因素进行逐步Logistic回归分析发现,年龄、陈旧性心梗史、入院即刻肌酐水平和肾小球滤过率为急性心梗患者PCI治疗后出现不良结局的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论:入院即刻肌酐水平与患者长期预后关系更为密切,高肌酐水平者预后不良可能性更大。  相似文献   

10.
目的 探讨急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者预后发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的影响因素。方法 从医院2019年2月至2022年2月收治的急性冠脉综合征患者中选取200例,随访1 a,观察MACE的发生情况,并根据随访结果进行分组,收集并对比两组一般资料[性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、吸烟史、饮酒史、基础合并症(高血压、糖尿病)、心血管病家族史]、临床指标(冠脉病变支数、植入支架数)、心功能指标[左室射血分数(LVEF)]、实验室指标[肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、肌钙蛋白T(cTnT)]。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析冠脉病变支数、LVEF、CK-MB、cTnT预测ACS患者预后发生MACE的价值。采用多因素logistic回归分析明确ACS患者预后发生MACE的危险因素。结果 随访1 a后,MACE组40例(20.00%),未发生MACE组160例(80.00%)。两组性别、年龄、BMI、吸烟史、饮酒史、高血压、糖尿病、心血管病家族史、植入支架数对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),发生MACE组冠脉病变支数1支占比高于未发生MACE组(P<0.05),LVEF...  相似文献   

11.
Background For patients with moderate to high-risk acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who undergo early, invasive treatment strategies, current guidelines recommend the usage of glycoprotein (GP) lib/Ilia inhibitors as an upstream treatment for a coronary care unit or as an downstream provisional treatment for selected patients who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The relative advantage of either strategy is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of upstream tirofiban versus the effects of downstream tirofiban on myocardial damage and 180-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after PCI in high-risk non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) undergoing PCI. Methods From July 2006 to July 2007, 160 high-risk NSTE-ACS undergoing PCI were randomized to receive upstream (within 4-6 hours before coronary angiography) tirofiban or downstream (the guidewire crossing the lesion) tirofiban, to evaluate the extent of myocardial damage after PCI by quantitatively and qualitatively analyzing the value of cardiac troponin I (cTnl) as well as MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB) before and after PCI. The incidences of 24-hour, 3-day, 7-day, 30-day and 180-day MACE after PCI were followed up and the rates of bleeding complications and thrombocytopenia during tirofiban administration were recorded. Results The peak release and cumulative release of cTnl levels within 48 hours after PCI were significantly lower with upstream tirofiban than downstream tirofiban (0.45 vs 0.63 and 0.32 vs 0.43, respectively; P 〈0.05). Post-procedural cTnl elevation within 48 hours was significantly less frequent among patients who received the upstream tirofiban than those who received the downstream tirofiban (66.3% vs 87.5%, P 〈0.05). The peak and cumulative release of CK-MB levels as well as post-procedural CK-MB elevation within 48 hours after PCI were not significantly different between the two groups (16 vs 14,5 vs 3 and 26.3% vs 36.3%, respectively; P 〉0.05). The incidences of 24-hour, 3-day, and 7-day MACE after PCI were the same between the two groups (0 vs 0, 0 vs 0 and 1.25% vs 1.25%, respectively). Although the incidences of 30-day and 180-day MACE after PCI were not statisticially different between the two groups, the incidences were consistently lower with upstream tirofiban (3.75% vs 6.25% and 12.99% vs 16.67%; P 〉0.05). Aging (OR=1.164, P 〈0.001), hypertension (OR=4.165, P=0.037) and type 2 diabetes (OR=13.628, P 〈0.001) were independent risk factors of MACE. The timing of administrating the tirofiban (OR=2.416, P=-0.153) plays an extensive role in the incidence of MACE. The incidences of major and minor bleeding complications as well as mild thrombocytopenia during the administration of tirofiban were similar between the two groups (2.50% vs 1.25%, 1.25% vs 1.25% and 1.25% vs 1.25%, respectively; P 〉0.05). Conclusions Based on the pretreatment with aspirin and clopidogrel, upstream tirofiban was associated with attenuated minor myocardial damage and the tendency of reducing incidences of 180-day MACE after PCI among high-risk NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI. Aging, hypertension and type 2 diabetes were independent risk factors of MACE in high-risk NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI associated with tirofiban.  相似文献   

12.
Background Randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated the superiority of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as opposed to bare-metal stents, in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study aimed to test the hypothesis that clinical benefits of SES treatment were independent of gender in this setting.Methods A total of 2042 patients with STEMI undergoing SES-based primary PCI were prospectively enrolled into Shanghai Acute Coronary Event (SACE) registry (1574 men and 468 women). Baseline demographics, angiographic and PCI features, and in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were analyzed as a function of gender. Results Compared with men, women were older and more frequently had hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia. Use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor (GPI, 65.5% vs. 62.2%, P=0.10) and procedural success rate (95.0% vs. 94.2%, P=0.52) were similar in both genders. In-hospital death and MACE occurred in 3.8% and 7.6%, and 4.5% and 8.1% in the male and female patients, respectively (all P 〉0.05). At 30-day follow-up, survival (94.3% vs. 93.8%, P=0.66) and MACE-free survival (90.2% vs. 89.3%, P=0.52) did not significantly differ between men and women. After adjustment for differences in patient demographics, angiographic and proceduralfeatures, there were no significant difference in either in-hospital (OR=0.77, 95%C/ of 0.48 to 1.22, P=0.30) or 30-day mortality (OR=1.28, 95%C/ of 0.73 to 2.23, P=0.38) between women and men.Conclusion Despite more advanced age and clustering of risk factors in women, female patients with STEMI treated by SES-based primary PCI had similar in-hospital and short-term clinical outcomes as their male counterparts.  相似文献   

13.
Background Patients aged over 85 years have been under-represented in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials despite an increase in referrals for PCI. The long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary stenting in patients aged over 85 years with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain unclear. Moreover it is unknown whether there are differences between bare metal stent (BMS) and drug eluting stent iDES) in this special population.
Methods A total of 80 patients with ACS aged over 85 years undergoing stenting (BMS group n=21 vs DES group n=59) were retrospectively studied. In-hospital, one year and overall clinical follow-up (12-36 months) of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including cardiac deaths, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascutarization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) as well as stroke and other major bleeding were compared between the two groups.
Results In the entire cohort, the procedure success rate was 93.8% with TIMI-3 coronary flow post-PCI in 93.8% of the vessels and the procedure related complication was 17.5%. The incidence of in-hospital MACEs in BMS group was higher (14.3% vs 6.8%, P=0.30). The 1-year incidence of MACEs in DES group was 7.0% while there was no MACE in the BMS group. Clinical follow-up for 12-36 months showed that the overall survival free from MACE was 82.9% and the incidence of MACE in the BMS group was lower (5.3% vs 21.1%, P=0.20). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the creatinine level (OR:. 1.013; 95%CI: 1.006-1.020; P=0.004) and hypertension (OR; 3.201; 95%CI: 1.000-10.663; P=0.04) are two major factors affecting the long-term MACE.
Conclusions Percutaneous coronary stenting in patients aged over 85 years is safe and provides good short and tona-term efficacy. Patients with renal dvsfunction and hvoertension may have a relatively hiah incidence of MACE.  相似文献   

14.
血栓抽吸导管在ACS急诊PCI中的临床应用研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
目的探讨血栓抽吸导管治疗在ACS常规急诊PCI中的临床疗效。方法选择2010年1月-2011年5月我院住院行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗的93例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死和高危、极高危非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合症(ACS)患者,随机分为联用ThrombusterⅡ血栓抽吸导管治疗为A组(51例),同期未应用血栓抽吸导管治疗为B组(42例)。比较两组患者术后心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)血流、校正TIMI帧数(CTFC)、术后心肌呈色分级(BMG)、术后ST段抬高回落幅度及左心室射血分数(LVEF)、住院期间主要心血管不良事件(MACE)有无差异。结果 A组TIMI血流3级、CTFC、BMG、术后ST段抬高回落幅度及LVEF均优于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组患者院内MACE发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论在ACS常规急诊PCI中联用ThrombusterⅡ血栓抽吸导管治疗可显著改善患者TIMI血流、心肌组织水平灌注及术后心功能,但住院期间MACE的发生率无差异。  相似文献   

15.
Background The clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is poorer in women than that in men. This study aimed at comparing the impact of gender difference on the strategy of primary PCI in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Methods Two hundred and fifty-nine patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI within 12 hours of symptom onset were enrolled. The male group consisted of 143 men aged 〉55 years, and a female group included 116 women without age limitation. Procedural success was defined as residual stenosis 〈20% with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 〉2 and without death, emergency bypass surgery or disabling cerebral events during the hospitalization. The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization during follow-up, was recorded.
Results Female patients were more hypertensive and diabetic and with fewer cigarette smokers than male counterparts. The prevalence of angiographic 3-vessel disease was higher in the female group, but the procedural success rate was comparable between the two groups (94.4% vs 92.2%). The occurrence rate of MACE did not differ during the hospitalization (4.2% vs 6.0%, P=0.50), but was significantly higher in the female group during follow-up (mean (16.0±11.2) months) than that in the male group (5.4% vs 0.7%, P=0.02).
Conclusion Despite a similar success rate of primary PCI and in-hospital outcomes in both genders, female patients with acute STEMI still have a worse prognosis during the long-term follow-up.  相似文献   

16.
C反应蛋白对冠状动脉支架置入术后的预测价值   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
目的 :探讨术前血清C反应蛋白 (CRP)水平对冠状动脉支架置入术后主要心血管事件 (MACE)的预测价值。方法 :术前测定 6 5例连续行直接经皮冠状动脉介入干预 (PCI)术患者 [31例稳定型心绞痛 (SAP)和 34例急性冠脉综合征 (ACS) ]血清CRP水平。将患者分为CRP <3.0mg l(30例 )和CRP≥ 3.0 (35例 )两组 ,观察患者临床特征 ,并随访 7.0± 3.5个月主要心血管事件。结果 :术前血清CRP水平在ACS比SAP组高 [(12 .6± 4 .2 )比 (4 .8± 1.2 )mg l,P <0 .0 1];术后随访 7.0± 3.5个月的主要心血管事件发生率CRP高者远高于CRP低者 (2 5 .7%比 10 .0 % ,P <0 .0 1)。结论 :术前血清CRP水平是冠状动脉病变支架置入术后主要心血管事件的预测指标。这提示术后主要心血管事件发生率和支架置入术前炎症细胞活化程度密切相关  相似文献   

17.
目的:探讨对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者采取经皮冠脉介入(PCI)治疗的临床疗效。方法:对我院行PCI治疗的ACS患者130例治疗资料作以回顾分析,并根据其穿刺动脉不同分为经桡动脉组60例(观察组)与经股动脉组70例(对照组),对比观察两组PCI治疗即刻成功率及并发症情况。结果:观察组PCI治疗即刻成功率为95.0%,较对照组95.7%无统计学差异(P〉0.05);严重并发症比较无显著差异(P〉0.05)。观察组平均住院天数较对照组短(P〈0.05)。结论:经桡动脉PCI治疗ACS成功率高,创伤小,患者住院时间短,可作为治疗ACS的常用方法。  相似文献   

18.
目的观察早期使用替罗非班对非ST段抬高的急性冠脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者在冠脉介入治疗(PCI)术后C反应蛋白(CRP)、心肌标志物肌酸激酶同工酶(CKMB)、肌钙蛋白(TnI)及主要心血管不良事件(MACE)、出血事件的影响。方法将入选的择期行PCI的NSTE-ACS患者随机分为早期使用替罗非班组(n=24,PCI术前12~24h)和术中使用替罗非班组(n=23,PCI术开始时)。术前及术后24h查CRP、CKMB、TnI。观察PCI术后3d出血事件。随访30d,记录MACE。结果与术中替罗非班组比较,早期替罗非班组没有降低术后CRP水平,没有影响术后CKMB、TnI水平(均P>0.05),没有减少术后30dMACE,出血事件发生率亦无明显差异。结论对于择期行PCI的NSTE-ACS患者,与术中使用替罗非班比较,早期使用替罗非班没有更多获益。  相似文献   

19.
目的:比较溶栓后即刻经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(即刻PCI)与直接PCI治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)的安全性和疗效。方法:分析接受PCI治疗的连续130例STEMI患者冠脉病变及干预情况,随机分为尿激酶150万单位溶栓后即刻PCI和直接PCI两组,记录术中慢血流无血流、出血并发症、平均住院日、院内死亡率及平均18.1个月随访期间终点事件发生率。结果:两组临床特征及冠状动脉病变相似(P>0.05),即刻PCI组与直接PCI组相比,就诊-球囊时间、术中无血流慢血流、PCI成功率、出血并发症、平均住院日、院内死亡率以及18.1个月心血管事件发生事均无显著差异(P均>0.05)。结论:即刻PCI不增加出血并发症,但近期疗效和远期预后并未发现优于直接PCI。  相似文献   

20.
目的探讨急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时冠状动脉(冠脉)内注射负荷剂量盐酸替罗非班对心肌灌注及心功能的影响。方法选择2007年7月—2008年12月我科确诊STEMI并接受急诊PCI患者70例,随机分为观察组(36例)和对照组(34例)。两组患者均进行PCI,术中观察组患者给予盐酸替罗非班10μg/kg冠脉内注射,对照组给予等量0.9%氯化钠注射液冠脉内注射。比较两组患者PCI术后即刻造影结果,术后7、30、180 d的左室射血分数(EF)、左室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左室收缩末期内径(LVESD)及术后180 d主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率,同时观察住院期间的出血并发症。结果观察组患者术后校正TIMI帧数、术后2 h ST段回落程度、磷酸肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)峰值及峰值时间均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);梗死相关血管无复流发生率及术后180 d MACE(包括死亡、再梗死、再次靶血管重建)发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);与对照组比较,观察组术后7、30、180 d的EF显著增加,LVEDD、LVESD显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组住院期间出血并发症的发生率间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论对于STEMI患者行急诊PCI术中联合冠脉内注射替罗非班治疗可减少无复流、慢血流现象的发生,改善心肌水平再灌注状态和左室功能,同时不增加出血发生率,有利于提高临床预后。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号