Thrombotic microangiopathy following aortic surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest: a single-centre experience of an underestimated cause of acute renal failure

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESAcute kidney injury (AKI) following surgery involving the heart-lung-machine is associated with high mortality and morbidity. In addition to the known mechanisms, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) triggered by the dysregulation of complement activation was recently described as another pathophysiological pathway for AKI following aortic surgery. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse incidence, predictors and outcome in these patients.METHODSBetween January 2018 and September 2019, consecutive patients undergoing aortic surgery requiring hypothermic circulatory arrest were retrospectively reviewed. If suspected, diagnostic algorithm was initiated to identify a TMA and its risk factors, and postoperative outcome parameters were comparably investigated.RESULTSThe incidence of TMA in the analysed cohort (n = 247) was 4.5%. Multivariable logistic regression indicated female gender {odds ratio (OR) 4.905 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.234–19.495], P = 0.024} and aortic valve replacement [OR 8.886 (95% CI 1.030–76.660), P = 0.047] as independent predictors of TMA, while cardiopulmonary bypass, X-clamp and hypothermic circulatory arrest times showed no statistically significance. TMA resulted in postoperative AKI (82%), neurological disorders (73%) and thrombocytopaenia [31 (interquartile range 25–42) G/l], corresponding to the diagnostic criteria. Operative mortality and morbidity were equal to patients without postoperative TMA, despite a higher incidence of re-exploration for bleeding (27 vs 6%; P = 0.027). After 6 months, survival, laboratory parameters and need for dialysis were comparable between the groups.CONCLUSIONSTMA is a potential differential diagnosis for the cause of AKI following aortic surgery regardless of the hypothermic circulatory arrest time. Timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment resulted in a comparable outcome concerning mortality and renal function.     

Extensive calcification of the mitral valve annulus in transcatheter aortic valve implants

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESThis study sought to report the calcification pattern of the mitral valve annulus and its implications for procedural and safety outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.METHODSBetween November 2018 and September 2019, a total of 305 patients had transcatheter aortic valve implants at our institution. The extent of calcification of the mitral valve annulus was analysed, and the impact on safety outcomes was evaluated.RESULTSThe prevalence of mitral annular calcification (MAC) was 43%. Calcification of the mitral valve annulus was either less than or at least one-third of the posterior annulus (34% and 32%), the whole posterior annulus (28%) or the extension to the attachment of the anterior leaflets (7%). Severe circumferential MAC revealed moderate paravalvular leaks in 5/8 (63%) patients and was associated with right branch bundle block [odds ratio (OR) 2.01 (0.39–3.06); P = 0.098] and low cardiac output [OR 3.12 (1.39–7.04); P = 0.033]. Subannular calcification at the anterolateral trigonum represented a risk factor for left ventricular outflow tract injury [OR 3.54 (1.38–8.27); P = 0.001] in balloon-expandable valves, associated with relevant rhythm disorders [OR 2.26 (1.17–5.65); P = 0.014] and female gender (7/8, 88%). The 30-day all-cause mortality in circumferential MAC reaching into the anterior annulus (grade IV) compared to patients with less MAC (grade I–III) was 13% vs 2% with a mean valve size of 24.6 vs 25.7 mm.CONCLUSIONSExtensive MAC was associated with moderate paravalvular leaks, with implications for the prosthesis size and survival in transcatheter aortic valve implants. In severe MAC, we recommend implanting oversized self-expandable prostheses, the goal being to reduce the risk of right branch bundle block and paravalvular leaks.Subj collection122, 125     

Left ventricular assist device implants in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: do we need cardiopulmonary bypass?

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESImplanting a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a patient on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is challenging. The goal of this study was to compare the results of patients from a European registry who had a durable LVAD implanted with or without transition from ECLS to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).METHODSA total of 531 patients on ECLS support who had an LVAD implant between January 2010 and August 2018 were analysed; after 1:1 propensity score matching, we identified and compared 175 patients in each group.RESULTSThe duration of preoperative ECLS was 7 [standard deviation (SD) 6] vs 7 (SD 6) days in patients with or without CPB (P = 0.984). The surgical time was longer in the CPB group [285 (SD 72) vs 209 [SD 75] min; P ≤ 0.001). The postoperative chest tube output was comparable [1513 (SD 1311) vs 1390 (SD 1121) ml; P = 0.3]. However, re-exploration for bleeding was necessary in 41% vs 29% of patients with or without CPB (P = 0.01) and a significantly higher number of packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma [8 (SD 8) vs 6 (SD 4) units; P = 0.001 and 6 (SD 7) vs 5 (SD 5) units; P = 0.03] were administered to patients operated on with CPB. A postoperative mechanical right ventricular support device was necessary in 50% vs 41% of patients (P = 0.08). The stroke rate was not significantly different (P 0.99). No difference in survival was observed.CONCLUSIONSOmitting CPB for an LVAD implant in patients on ECLS is safe and results in shorter operating time, less re-exploration for bleeding and fewer blood products. However, no survival benefit is observed.     

Sex differences in outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESPrevious reports have found females are a higher risk of morbidity and mortality following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Here, we describe the differences in outcomes following isolated CABG between males and females.METHODSFollowing a systematic literature search, studies reporting sex-related outcomes following isolated CABG were pooled in a meta-analysis performed using the generic inverse variance method. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of stroke, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events, and late mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed for studies published before and after the year 2000 and for the type of risk adjustment.RESULTSEighty-four studies were included with a total of 903 346 patients. Females were at higher risk for operative mortality (odds ratio: 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64–1.92, P < 0.001). At subgroup analysis, there was no difference in operative or late mortality between studies published prior and after 2000 or between studies using risk adjustment. Females were at a higher risk of late mortality (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06–1.26, P < 0.001), major adverse cardiac events (IRR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.19–1.66, P < 0.001), myocardial infarction (IRR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.13–1.45, P < 0.001) and stroke (IRR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15–1.51, P > 0.001) but not repeat revascularization (IRR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.76–1.29, P = 0.95). The use of the off-pump technique or multiple arterial grafts was not associated with the primary outcome.CONCLUSIONSFemales undergoing CABG are at higher risk for operative and late mortality as well as postoperative events including major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction and stroke. PROSPERO registrationCRD42020187556     

Women have a higher resection rate for lung cancer and improved survival after surgery

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESSurgery is the standard treatment in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer and select cases of small-cell lung cancer, but gender differences in its use and outcome are poorly known. Gender differences in surgical resection rates and long-term survival after lung cancer surgery were therefore investigated. METHODSIn Finland, 3524 patients underwent resection for primary lung cancer during 2004–2014. Surgical rate and mortality data were retrospectively retrieved from 3 nationwide compulsory registries. Survival was studied by comparing propensity-matched cohorts. Median follow-up was 8.6 years.RESULTSSurgery rate was higher in women (15.9% vs 12.3% in men, P < 0.0001). Overall survival was 85.3% 1 year, 51.4% 5 years, 33.4% 10 years and 24.2% at 14 years from surgery. In matched groups, survival after resection was better in women after 1 year (91.3% vs 83.3%), 5 years (60.2% vs 48.6%), 10 years (43.7% vs 27.9%) and 14 years (29.0% vs 21.1%) after surgery [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66; confidence interval (CI) 0.58–0.75; P < 0.0001]. Of all first-year survivors, 39.1% were alive 10 years and 28.3% 14 years after surgery. Among these matched first-year survivors, women had higher 14-year survival (36.9% vs 25.3%; HR 0.75; CI 0.65–0.87; P = 0.0002).CONCLUSIONSSurgery is performed for lung cancer more often in women. Women have more favourable short- and long-term outcome after lung cancer surgery. Gender discrepancy in survival continues to increase beyond the first year after surgery.     

Impact of dialysis in patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESTo determine the incidence of bioprosthetic structural valve deterioration in dialysis patients undergoing aortic valve replacement compared to that in patients without dialysis.METHODSThis single-centre retrospective observational study included 1159 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement using bioprosthetic valves for aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation at our institution between 2007 and 2017 [patients with dialysis (group D, n = 134, 12%) or without dialysis (group N, n = 1025, 88%)]. To adjust for potential differences between groups in terms of initial preoperative characteristics or selection bias, a propensity score analysis was conducted. The final sample that was used in the comparison included 258 patients, as follows: 129 patients with dialysis (group D) and 129 patients without dialysis (group N). The cumulative incidences of all-cause death, cardiac death and moderate or severe structural valve deterioration were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.RESULTSOperative mortality was significantly higher in group D than group N (9% vs 0%, P = 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that in group D, the incidence was significantly higher for all-cause death (P < 0.001, 50% vs 18% at 5 years), cardiac death (P = 0.001, 18% vs 5% at 5 years) and moderate or severe structural valve deterioration (P < 0.001, 29% vs 5% at 5 years) compared with group N.CONCLUSIONSThe incidence of structural valve deterioration in dialysis patients undergoing aortic valve replacement was higher than that in patients without dialysis. Bioprosthetic valves should be carefully selected in dialysis patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.     

Mid-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with mild left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESLeft ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is common and associated with adverse events in patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the prognosis of mild LVSD has not been clearly described. We aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of patients with mild LVSD following CABG.METHODSThis multicentre cohort study using propensity score matching took place from December 2012 to October 2019 in Jiangsu Province, China, with a mean and maximum follow-up of 3.2 and 7.2 years, respectively. Patients were classified to normal left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥53%) and mild LVSD (left ventricular ejection fraction >40%/<53%). The primary outcomes were death from all causes and death from cardiovascular causes. The secondary outcomes were heart failure, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and a composite of all mentioned outcomes, including death from all causes (major adverse events).RESULTSA total of 581 pairs were formed after matching. In-hospital death (1.5% vs 2.1%, P = 0.51) did not differ between 2 cohorts. Throughout 7 years, mild LVSD was associated with higher rates of death from all causes [hazard ratio (HR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39–0.89; P = 0.012], death from cardiovascular causes (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36–0.90; P = 0.017), heart failure (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37–0.93; P = 0.023) and major adverse events (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49–0.91; P = 0.009). There was no difference in the rates of myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization.CONCLUSIONSMild LVSD was associated with a worse mid-term prognosis in patients following CABG.     

Risk-adjusted analysis of long-term outcomes after on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESRecent data suggested that off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may carry a higher risk for mortality in the long term when compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB). We, therefore, compared long-term survival and morbidity in patients undergoing ONCAB versus OPCAB in a large single-centre cohort.METHODSA total of 8981 patients undergoing isolated elective/urgent coronary artery bypass grafting between January 2009 and December 2019 were analysed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups (OPCAB n = 6649/ONCAB n = 2332). The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included repeat revascularization, stroke and myocardial infarction. To adjust for potential selection bias, 1:1 nearest neighbour propensity score (PS) matching was performed resulting in 1857 matched pairs. Moreover, sensitivity analysis was applied in the entire study cohort using multivariable- and PS-adjusted Cox regression analysis.RESULTSIn the PS-matched cohort, 10-year mortality was similar between study groups [OPCAB 36.4% vs ONCAB 35.8%: hazard ratio (HR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.12; P = 0.84]. While 10-year outcomes of secondary endpoints did not differ significantly, risk of stroke (OPCAB 1.50% vs ONCAB 2.8%: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32–0.83; P = 0.006) and mortality (OPCAB 3.1% vs ONCAB 4.8%: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47–0.91; P = 0.011) at 1 year was lower in the OPCAB group. In the multivariable- and the PS-adjusted model, mortality at 10 years was not significantly different (OPCAB 34.1% vs ONCAB 35.7%: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87–1.08; P = 0.59 and HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90–1.13; P = 0.91, respectively).CONCLUSIONSData do not provide evidence that elective/urgent OPCAB is associated with significantly higher risks of mortality, repeat revascularization, or myocardial infarction during late follow-up when compared to ONCAB. Patients undergoing OPCAB may benefit from reduced risks of stroke and mortality within the first year postoperatively.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival outcomes after complete resection of thymic squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study of 116 patients

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for thymic squamous cell carcinoma after completely resection.METHODSPatients with thymic squamous cell carcinoma treated with complete resection between January 2009 and December 2016 were retrospectively identified. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to summarize the time-to-event variables. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed.RESULTSA total of 116 patients were analysed with 44 patients in the non-ACT group and 72 patients in the ACT group. No significant difference was found in the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (58.1% vs 51%, P = 0.33) or the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (77.7% vs 67.1%, P = 0.26) between the ACT group and the non-ACT group. Masaoka stage was the only independent prognostic factor for both RFS and OS. Subgroup analysis showed significant improvement in 5-year RFS for Masaoka stage II patients (P = 0.035) and 5-year OS (P = 0.036) for Masaoka stage III patients when comparing ACT with non-ACT. No chemotherapy-related death occurred. The most frequent adverse effect higher than grade 3 was neutropenia.CONCLUSIONSFor completely resected thymic squamous cell carcinoma, ACT significantly improved the 5-year RFS in Masaoka stage II patients and the 5-year OS in Masaoka stage III patients.     

Male–female differences in acute thoracic aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESThis study aims to systematically review published literature on male–female differences in presentation, management and outcomes in patients diagnosed with acute thoracic aortic dissection (AD).METHODSA systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between 1 January 1999 and 19 October 2020 investigating mortality and morbidity in adult patients diagnosed with AD. Patient and treatment characteristics were compared with odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences and a meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed for early mortality. Overall survival and reoperation were visualized by pooled Kaplan–Meier curves.RESULTSNine studies investigating type A dissections (AD-A), 1 investigating type B dissections (AD-B) and 3 investigating both AD-A and AD-B were included encompassing 18 659 patients. Males were younger in both AD-A (P < 0.001) and AD-B (P < 0.001), and in AD-A patients males had more distally extended dissections [OR 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46–0.70; P < 0.001]. Longer operation times were observed for males in AD-A (standardized mean difference 0.29, 95% CI 0.17–0.41; P < 0.001) while male patients were less often treated conservatively in AD-B (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.58–0.72; P < 0.001). The pooled early mortality risk ratio for males versus females was 0.94 (95% CI 0.84–1.06, P = 0.308) in AD-A and 0.92 (95% CI 0.83–1.03, P = 0.143) in AD-B. Pooled overall mortality in AD-A showed no male–female difference, whereas male patients had more reinterventions during follow-up.CONCLUSIONSThis systematic review shows male–female differences in AD patient and treatment characteristics, comparable early and overall mortality and inconsistent outcome reporting. As published literature is scarce and heterogeneous, large prospective studies with standardized reporting of male–female characteristics and outcomes are clearly warranted. Improved knowledge of male–female differences in AD will help shape optimal individualized care for both males and females.Clinical registration numberPROSPERO, ID number: CRD42020155926.     

Box lesion or bi-atrial lesion set for atrial fibrillation during thoracoscopic epicardial ablation

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESThoracoscopic epicardial ablation with a limited lesion set led to suboptimal results for advanced paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) or persistent AF. Whether additional right atrial lesions improve the result is unclear.METHODSWe conducted a retrospective study involving 80 consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF, left atrial (LA) dilation (LA diameter >40 mm) and failed prior interventional ablation (40 patients, 50%) who underwent thoracoscopic epicardial ablation with box lesions (36 patients) or bi-atrial (BA) lesion (44 patients) in our institution. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias after the procedures was compared between the box lesion group and BA lesion group.RESULTSBaseline differences included more patients with persistent AF (86.4% vs 47.2%) and larger left atrium [48.00 (44.00–50.75) vs 42.00 (41.25–44.00) mm] in the BA lesion group. There was no difference in procedural complications between the 2 groups. After a mean follow-up of 32 months, the freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs at 6, 12 and 24 months was 77.2%, 77.2% and 77.2% in the BA lesion group and 69.4%, 50.0% and 40.6% in the box lesion group, respectively (P = 0.006). After adjustment for sex, age, body mass index, LA diameter, AF type, history of AF, and previous interventional ablation, BA lesion was an independent predictor of lower atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (hazard ratio 0.447, 95% confidential interval 0.208–0.963; P = 0.040).CONCLUSIONSCompared with the box lesion set, thoracoscopic epicardial ablation with BA lesion sets might provide better freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias for paroxysmal or persistent AF with LA dilation. Randomized control trials are warranted to confirm the benefit of BA lesion sets in these patients.     

In-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing concomitant aortic and mitral valve replacement in Germany

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESTo evaluate in-hospital outcomes of concomitant mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients undergoing conventional aortic valve replacement due to aortic stenosis in a nationwide cohort.METHODSAdministrative data from all patients with aortic stenosis undergoing conventional aortic and concomitant MVR (reason for MVR not specified) between 2017 and 2018 in Germany were analysed.RESULTSA total of 2597 patients with a preoperative logistic EuroScore of 9.81 (standard deviation: 8.56) were identified. In-hospital mortality was 6.8%. An in-hospital stroke occurred in 3.4%, acute kidney injury in 16.3%, prolonged mechanical ventilation of more than 48 h in 16.3%, postoperative delirium in 15.8% and postoperative pacemaker implantation in 7.6% of the patients. Mean hospital stay was 16.5 (standard deviation: 12.1) days. Age [odds ratio (OR): 1.03; P = 0.019], New York Heart Association class III or IV (OR: 1.63; P = 0.012), previous cardiac surgery (OR: 2.85, P = 0.002), peripheral vascular disease (OR: 2.01, P = 0.031), pulmonary hypertension (OR: 1.63, P = 0.042) and impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate <15, OR: 3.58, P = 0.001; glomerular filtration rate <30, OR: 2.51, P = 0.037) were identified as independent predictors for in-hospital mortality.CONCLUSIONSIn this nationwide analysis, concomitant aortic and MVR was associated with acceptable in-hospital mortality, morbidity and length of in-hospital stay. The regression analyses may help to identify high-risk patients and further optimize treatment strategies.     

The influence of preoperative dialysis on survival after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESDialysis is considered a contraindication to continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. We evaluated clinical outcomes and survival in carefully selected, low-risk patients with renal failure who required dialysis before CF-LVAD implantation.METHODSWe extracted medical record data of patients who underwent CF-LVAD placement at our centre between 1 January 2006 and 31 August 2017, with 2 clinical scenarios: those who required long-term (>14 days) dialysis and those who required short-term (≤14 days) dialysis immediately before implantation. Demographic, clinical and intraoperative characteristics and survival outcomes were assessed.RESULTSOf 621 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation during the study period, 31 underwent dialysis beforehand. Of these, 17 required long-term dialysis (13 haemodialysis, 4 peritoneal dialysis), and 14 underwent short-term haemodialysis. Compared with the long-term dialysis patients, the short-term dialysis patients were more likely to be Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1–2 (92.9% vs 70.6%; P < 0.001), to have needed preoperative mechanical circulatory support (78.6% vs 70.6%; P < 0.01) and to have higher in-hospital mortality (85.7% vs 29.4%; P = 0.01). Patients stable on long-term dialysis had acceptable overall survival and markedly better 6-month and 1-year survival than those with short-term dialysis before implantation (64.7% vs 14.3% and 58.8% vs 7.1%, respectively; P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSCarefully selected patients who are stable on long-term dialysis have acceptable survival rates after CF-LVAD implantation. Patients with acute renal failure had much poorer outcomes than those with chronic end-stage renal disease.     

Do in-hospital outcomes of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting vary between male and female octogenarians?

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESFemale gender and advanced age are regarded as independent risk factors for adverse outcomes after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There is paucity of evidence comparing outcomes of CABG between male and female octogenarians. We aimed to analyse in-hospital outcomes of isolated CABG in this cohort.METHODSAll octogenarians that underwent isolated CABG, from January 2000 to October 2017, were included. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cardiac surgery database (PATS; Dendrite Clinical Systems, Oxford, UK) was performed. A propensity score was generated for each patient from a multivariable logistic regression model based on 25 pre-treatment covariates. A total of 156 matching pairs were derived.RESULTSFive hundred and sixty-seven octogenarians underwent isolated CABG. This included 156 females (mean age 82.1 [SD: 0.9]) and 411 males (mean age 82.4 [SD: 2.1 years]). More males were current smokers (P = 0.002) with renal impairment (P = 0.041), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.048), history of cerebrovascular accident (P = 0.039) and peripheral vascular disease (P = 0.027) while more females had New York Heart Association class 4 (P = 0.02), left ventricular ejection fraction 30–49% (P = 0.038) and left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (P = 0.049). On-pump, CABG was performed in 140 males and 52 females (P = 0.921). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality (5.4% vs 6.4%; P = 0.840), stroke (0.9% vs 1.3%; P = 0.689), need for renal replacement therapy (17.0% vs 13.5%; P = 0.732), pulmonary complications (9.5% vs 8.3%; P = 0.746) and sternal wound infection (2.7% vs 2.6%; P = 0.882). The outcomes were comparable for the propensity-matched cohorts.CONCLUSIONSNo gender difference in outcomes was seen in octogenarians undergoing isolated CABG.     

Impact of gender on 10-year outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESOur goal was to evaluate the impact of gender on the 10-year outcome of patients after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) included in the Italian nationwide PRedictIng long-term Outcomes afteR Isolated coronary arTery bypass surgery (PRIORITY) study.METHODSThe PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent CABG and were included in 2 prospective multicentre cohort studies. The primary end point of this analysis was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Baseline differences between the study groups were balanced with propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment. Time to events was analysed using Cox regression and competing risk analysis.RESULTSThe study population comprised 10 989 patients who underwent isolated CABG (women 19.6%). Propensity score matching produced 1898 well-balanced pairs. The hazard of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event was higher in women compared to men [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.23; P = 0.009]. The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event in women was significantly higher at 1 year (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11–1.55; P < 0.001) and after 1 year (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00–1.24; P = 0.05). Mortality at 10 years in the matched groups was comparable (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.93–1.16; P = 0.531). Women have significantly a higher 10-year risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.17–1.68; P = 0.002) and percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.10–1.59; P = 0.003).CONCLUSIONSThe present study documented an excess of non-fatal cardiac events after CABG among women despite comparable 10-year survival with men. These findings suggest that studies investigating measures of tertiary prevention are needed to decrease the risk of adverse cardiovascular events among women.     

Mid-term outcomes of rapid deployment aortic prostheses in patients with small aortic annulus

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESThe Edwards Intuity valve is a rapid deployment aortic prosthesis that favours less invasive approaches. However, evidence about the clinical behaviour of their smaller sizes is scarce. Herein, we studied haemodynamic behaviours and clinical outcomes of small Intuity prostheses (19–21 mm) in comparison to larger Intuity prostheses (>21 mm).METHODSThis is an observational study including patients implanted with an Edwards Intuity rapid deployment aortic prosthesis. Patients with prosthesis sizes 19–21 and >21 mm were included. Baseline and perioperative variables, as well as adverse events during the follow-up were recorded and compared between groups.RESULTSA total of 122 patients (37% female, mean age 75 ± 4.5 years) were included, of whom 54 (45%) were implanted with a small prosthesis and 68 (55%) with a prosthesis >21 mm. There were no significant differences between patients with small Intuity prostheses and patients with larger prostheses regarding in-hospital mortality (2% vs 4%, P = 0.43) or mortality during the follow-up (3.41 vs 2.45 per 100 patients-years; P = 0.58). Survival in the small Intuity valve group was 95% at 1 year and 83% at 6 years, whereas in the larger Intuity valve group was 96% at 1 year and 78% at 6 years. The presence of a small prosthesis did not influence mid-term survival (log-rank P-value = 0.62).CONCLUSIONSThis study showed good clinical performance of Intuity aortic prostheses with appropriate mid-term survival in patients with the small aortic annulus. Thus, the Edwards Intuity rapid deployment aortic prosthesis may be considered as a potential option in patients with the small aortic annulus.     

Fragmented QRS complex may predict long-term mortality after isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESFragmented QRS (fQRS), related to myocardial fibrosis, is an important prognostic marker of cardiovascular events and mortality. Aortic stenosis (AS), the most frequent valvular heart disease in developed countries, causes myocardial fibrosis due to ventricular pressure overload. The current study aimed to investigate whether fQRS is associated with long-term mortality after isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe AS.METHODSA total of 289 patients who underwent SAVR for severe AS between May 2009 and January 2020 with interpretable electrocardiogram were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of fQRS. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used to detect cumulative survival rates. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the predictors of all-cause mortality.RESULTSfQRS occurred in 126 (43.5%) patients. A total of 59 (20.4%) patients died over a follow-up period of 54 ± 32 months. All-cause mortality was higher in the fQRS group (23 [14.1%] vs 36 [28.6], log-rank test P = 0.002) in the long term. The presence of fQRS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.802, confidence interval (CI): 1.035–3.135, P = 0.037], electrocardiographic left ventricular strain (HR: 1.836, CI: 1.036–3.254, P = 0.038) and history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (HR: 3.130, CI: 1.528–6.412, P = 0.002) were independent predictors of all-cause mortality in the multivariable Cox regression model.CONCLUSIONSfQRS is associated with a 1.8-fold increase in long-term mortality in patients undergoing isolated SAVR for severe AS. Detecting fQRS in electrocardiograms may provide prognostic information about the long-term outcomes.     

Low thoracic muscle mass index on computed tomography predicts adverse outcomes following lobectomy via thoracotomy for lung cancer

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESThe aim of this study was to determine whether the preoperative thoracic muscle mass is associated with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lobectomy via thoracotomy for lung cancer.METHODSConsecutive patients undergoing lobectomy were retrospectively reviewed. The thoracic muscle mass index (TMMI) was obtained at the level of the fifth thoracic vertebra on preoperative thoracic computed tomography (CT). Patients were analysed comparatively by being dividing into low and high muscle index groups by the median of sex-specific TMMI. The primary outcomes were the incidence of any or postoperative pulmonary complications. The secondary outcomes were postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of stay (LOS) in the ICU, total hospital LOS, readmission and mortality.RESULTSThe study population consisted of 120 patients (63.6 ± 9.8 years; 74% male). Each groups included 60 patients. Major complications occurred in 28.3% (34/120) and readmission in 18.3% (22/120) of patients. The adjusted multivariable analysis showed that each unit increase in TMMI (cm²/m²) was independently associated with the rates of less any complications [odds ratio (OR) 0.92, P = 0.014], pulmonary complications (OR 0.27, P = 0.019), ICU admission (OR 0.76, P = 0.031), hospitalization for >6 days (OR 0.90, P = 0.008) and readmission (OR 0.93, P = 0.029).CONCLUSIONSLow TMMI obtained from the preoperative thoracic CT is an independent predictor of postoperative adverse outcomes in patients following lobectomy via thoracotomy for lung cancer. TMMI measurements may contribute to the development of preoperative risk stratification studies in the future.     

Comparison of patency of single and sequential radial artery grafting in coronary artery bypass

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESSequential radial artery (RA) grafting has the potential to enhance arterial revascularization compared to single grafting. Sequential RA grafting was performed predominantly with a single side-to-side anastomosis. The study aimed to assess if sequential RA grafting improved long-term graft patency compared to single RA grafting. In addition, the anastomotic patencies of side-to-side and end-to-side anastomoses in sequential RA grafting were assessed.METHODSTwo hundred nineteen patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with skeletonized RA conduits between 2005 and 2016. Of these, 208 patients underwent radiological graft assessment; thus, 125 and 83 patients underwent single and sequential RA grafting, respectively. The graft and anastomotic patency rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.RESULTSThe median follow-up period was 9.1 years, and the radiological assessment lasted 5.1 years. The overall RA graft patency rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 99.4%, 92.7% and 88.1%, respectively. The RA graft patency rate for sequential grafting was similar to that for single grafting (88.7% vs 87.4% at 10 years; P = 0.88). In the stratified analysis of anastomotic patency, the patency rate of side-to-side anastomoses of sequential RA grafting was significantly better than that of end-to-side anastomoses (100% vs 88.7% at 10 years; P = 0.01).CONCLUSIONSThe long-term RA graft patencies of sequential and single grafting were equally high. The anastomotic patency of side-to-side anastomoses of sequential RA grafting was remarkably high. Considering these findings, the RA can be effectively used for multiple arterial coronary revascularizations.     

Analysis of 3-dimensional interventricular septum and abnormal muscle bundles models for septal myectomy

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESWe compared the effectiveness of virtual 3-dimensional (3D) models with 2-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for evaluating the anatomy of the interventricular septum (IVS) and abnormal muscle bundles (AMBs) in planning septal myectomy (SM).METHODSBetween January 2017 and July 2020, 103 consecutive symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy underwent 2D TTE and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in 49 (47.6%) or computed tomography angiography in 54 (52.4%) patients with 3D IVS modelling for SM planning. We evaluated maximal IVS thickness and location, length and thickness of AMBs.RESULTSThe mean maximal IVS thickness by 2D TTE was 7.3 [standard deviation (SD) 4.8] mm less than that based on the 3D model analysis: 21.4 (SD 3.7) vs 28.6 (SD 5.5) mm, respectively (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 6.4–8.2). The planned volume of ideal SM was larger than that of performed SM: 26.2 (18.4–39.4) vs 10.3 (7.4–12.8) cm³, respectively (P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of 2D TTE in diagnosing AMBs were 36.9% and 95%, and those of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiography with 3D modelling were 97.1% and 100% for cardiovascular magnetic resonance and 98% and 100% for computed tomography angiography, respectively. AMBs occurred in 84 (81.6%) patients. No patient required mitral valve replacement. The 30-day mortality was 1 patient. There were 4 late non-cardiac deaths (3.9%) within 18.1 (standard error 1.32) months.CONCLUSIONSAnatomical analysis of the IVS and AMBs based on their virtual 3D models is highly effective for SM planning.