Triple-contrast helical CT in penetrating torso trauma: a prospective study to determine peritoneal violation and the need for laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective study was performed to determine the usefulness of triple-contrast helical CT in predicting peritoneal violation and the need for laparotomy in the treatment of penetrating torso trauma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Triple-contrast helical CT scans were obtained in 104 hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating injuries to the torso (thoracoabdominal region including tangential wounds to the anterior abdomen, flank, back, and pelvis) over a 17-month period. The study group included 54 patients with gunshot wounds and 50 with stab wounds. No patient had a radiographic or clinical indication for immediate laparotomy. A positive finding on CT was defined as evidence of peritoneal violation or injury to the retroperitoneal colon, major vessel, or urinary tract. Patients with a positive CT, except patients with isolated liver injury or free fluid, underwent laparotomy. Patients with a negative finding on CT were initially observed. RESULTS: CT studies were positive in 35 (34%) of 104 patients and negative in 69 (66%) of 104 of patients. Laparotomy was performed in 21 (60%) of 35 patients with positive CT; 19 (86%) of 22 were therapeutic, two (9%) were nontherapeutic, and one (5%) was negative (no injury was found). Nine patients with isolated hepatic injuries were successfully treated without laparotomy. Among patients with a negative CT, 67 (97%) of 69 were treated nonoperatively with success. CT had 100% (19/19) sensitivity, 96% (69/72) specificity, 100% (69/69) negative predictive value, and 97% (101/104) accuracy in predicting the need for laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Triple-contrast helical CT can accurately predict the need for laparotomy and exclude peritoneal violation in penetrating torso trauma including tangential abdominal wounds.     

Helical computed tomography characteristics of splenic and hepatic trauma in children subjected to nonoperative treatment

The purpose of this study was to present the radiological characteristics of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in the follow-up of splenic and hepatic injury in children. Children (n=24) less than 13 years old who had suffered blunt abdominal trauma and were diagnosed with splenic and hepatic injury by CT scan prospectively were enlisted in the study. The CT was performed immediately after the injury was suspected, and 7 and 60 days after the trauma. The clinical course of the patients was observed (red blood transfusion requirement, associated abdominal injuries, and hospital stay). The splenic and hepatic injuries varied from grade II to grade IV of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. The CT showed a reduction in the volume of the injury 60 days after the trauma. In this article the radiological findings will be shown and correlated with the clinical course of the patients. This study shows that CT is advantageous for detecting and grading splenic and hepatic injuries. These injuries can be managed nonoperatively in hospitals where CT is available for the evaluation of pediatric patients. Electronic Publication     

CT detection of serious internal and skeletal injuries in patients with pelvic fractures

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage of patients with known pelvic fractures who have additional findings of intraabdominal injury, as diagnosed at abdominal computed tomography (CT), and to determine if patients with specific types or patterns of fractures are more likely to have additional injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the medical records of 200 consecutive patients (125 women, 75 men; age range, 4-86 years) who had been admitted to a level 1 trauma center with osseous pelvic injury secondary to blunt trauma and who had undergone abdominal CT examinations. Abdominal CT findings in these patients were classified as negative, positive, or minimal and correlated with mechanism of pelvic fracture. RESULTS: Sixty-five (32%) of the 200 patients had negative CT findings, 43 (22%) had findings attributable to the trauma but required no follow-up, and 92 (46%) had positive findings that required nonsurgical management or exploratory laparotomy. Additional pelvic fractures were identified in 63 (32%) patients. The highest prevalence of additional injuries was in patients with Malgaigne fractures (four of 15, 27%) or bilateral pubic rami fractures (six of 18, 33%). CONCLUSION: CT examinations revealed that 135 (68%) of 200 patients with pelvic fractures secondary to blunt trauma had concomitant internal or skeletal injuries and that 92 (46%) patients had injuries severe enough to require nonsurgical management or exploratory laparotomy. Patients with bilateral pubic rami fractures or Malgaigne fractures were particularly prone to additional injuries; therefore, abdominal CT examinations are recommended in these patients.     

Visceral injury without hemoperitoneum: A limitation of screening abdominal sonography for trauma

Abdominal sonography for the detection of hemoperitoneum has become increasingly popular as a screening test for visceral injury after blunt trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency, severity, and clinical significance (outcome) of abdominal organ injuries that occur without hemoperitoneum on the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma patients.During a 12-month period, 3392 blunt trauma patients were admitted to our center. Sonographic studies were performed as an initial screening evaluation to determine the presence of hemoperitoneum in 772 (22.7%) of these patients. Abdominal visceral injuries were verified by computed tomography (CT) or surgery in 196 (5.8%) of all blunt trauma admissions. Sonography, CT, and operative findings were reviewed to determine the presence or absence of hemoperitoneum in patients with abdominal injury. Patients with abdominal visceral injury without hemoperitoneum were further analyzed to identify the type of injury and the management required.A total of 246 abdominal injuries were identified in 196 patients. Fifty (26%) patients with abdominal visceral injuries diagnosed by admission CT scan had no evidence of hemoperitoneum. Admission sonography performed in 15 (30%) of these 50 patients also showed no evidence of hemoperitoneum. Visceral injuries detected by CT in the patients without hemoperitoneum included 22 of 100 splenic injuries (22%), 18 of 91 hepatic injuries (20%), 12 of 26 renal injuries (46%), and 1 of 9 mesenteric injuries (11%). Surgery was required to manage injuries in 10 of these patients.Up to 26% of blunt trauma patients with abdominal visceral injuries do not have associated hemoperitoneum identified on admission abdominal CT or sonography. Dependence on hemoperitoneum as the sole criterion of abdominal visceral injury after blunt trauma will result in falsely negative examinations and will miss potentially significant injuries.     

Traumatic pneumoperitoneum. Implications of computed tomography diagnosis

Pneumoperitoneum detected on plain radiographs following blunt abdominal trauma is nearly pathognomonic of bowel perforation and usually mandates exploratory laparotomy. To determine the significance of computed tomography (CT)-detected pneumoperitoneum, we reviewed the clinical records and imaging studies of all trauma patients in our hospital over a seven-year period whose abdominal CT scans showed free intraperitoneal gas. Patients who had penetrating injuries or peritoneal lavage prior to CT were excluded. Of the 18 patients who met these inclusion criteria, surgically confirmed bowel injury was found in only four (22%). In the remaining 14 patients, no evidence of gastrointestinal perforation was found by exploratory laparotomy (2 patients), diagnostic peritoneal lavage (4 patients), GI studies and clinical follow-up (6 patients), or clinical follow-up alone (5 patients). Seven patients had a pneumothorax as a possible cause for pneumoperitoneum. Two additional patients were on mechanical ventilation. Unlike pneumoperitoneum seen on plain film, CT-detected pneumoperitoneum is not pathognomonic of bowel perforation. While laparotomy is not mandatory in the non-surgically explored patient, close clinical observation is essential, and additional diagnostic tests such as peritoneal lavage or radiographic contrast studies can be beneficial to confirm the absence of intestinal injury.     

CT在闭合性肝损伤诊断和治疗中的应用价值

目的　评价CT在闭合性肝外伤诊断和治疗中的应用价值。方法　回顾性分析 2 2例闭合性肝损伤患者的CT和临床资料 ,观察CT对闭合性肝损伤诊断的敏感性和特异性 ,并将肝损伤CT表现与手术、临床治疗结果进行对照。结果　 2 2例闭合性肝损伤者 ,CT明确诊断 2 1例 ,1例发现腹腔积液。CT诊断的特异性为 95 .5 % ( 2 1/2 2 )。CT分级 :I级 1例 ,II级 10例 ,III级 8例 ,IV级 2例。 8例行非手术治疗 (II级 3例 ,III级 5例 ) ,成功 7例 ,1例因迟发性肝破裂而非手术疗法失败。 1例复查CT发现肝上胆汁聚积 ,经穿刺引流治愈。 14例行剖腹探查术 ,4例术中发现肝脏仍有活动性出血。结论　CT扫描能明确肝损伤的诊断 ,界定损伤类型及严重程度 ,指导合理地选择手术或非手术疗法 ,并能监测康复过程中并发症的发生     

Hepatic and splenic injury in children: role of CT in the decision for laparotomy

Clinical and radiographic records of 274 children who were examined with abdominal computed tomography (CT) after blunt abdominal trauma were retrospectively evaluated to test the hypothesis that CT can assist in decisions to perform laparotomy in children with hepatic or splenic injury. CT demonstrated parenchymal injuries in 36 patients (13%) or 20 livers and 21 spleens. Injury to these organs was categorized as minor (39%), moderate (39%), and severe (21%) according to an assessment of the percentage of parenchymal involvement. Hemoperitoneum was detected in 27 of 36 patients (75%). One of 13 (4.7%) with a moderate to large splenic injury underwent splenorrhaphy because of persistent bleeding. One of 12 (5%) with a moderate to large hepatic injury required late operative intervention due to a large necrotic segment. Both children had a large amount of peritoneal fluid. Two of 16 patients (13%) with moderate to large hemoperitoneum required surgery for liver or splenic injury. The decision for laparotomy should not be based on the extent of injury as shown at CT but on the physiologic condition of the child.     

Hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injuries: a potential limitation of screening abdominal US for trauma.

PURPOSE: To determine, at screening ultrasonography, the prevalence, severity, and clinical outcome of clinically important abdominal visceral injuries, without associated hemoperitoneum, that result from blunt abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) was performed at admission in 466 patients with visceral injury. A retrospective review was performed of findings from surgery and contrast material-enhanced spiral and conventional CT performed to verify abdominal visceral injuries in 467 (4%) of 11,188 patients with blunt trauma. These patients were admitted to a level 1 trauma center over 33 months to determine the presence of hemoperitoneum and to identify the grade of injury. Medical records of patients with abdominal visceral injury without hemoperitoneum were reviewed for the management required and for results of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST). RESULTS: A total of 575 abdominal visceral injuries were identified at CT and/or surgery. Findings of CT at admission (n = 156) and of surgery (n = 1) revealed no evidence of hemoperitoneum in 157 (34%) patients with abdominal visceral injury; 26 (17%) of whom also had negative FAST studies. Abdominal visceral injuries diagnosed in patients without hemoperitoneum included 57 (27%) of 210 splenic injuries, 71 (34%) of 206 hepatic injuries, 30 (48%) of 63 renal injuries, four (11%) of 35 mesenteric injuries, and two (29%) of seven pancreatic injuries. Surgical and/or angiographic intervention was required in 26 (17%) patients without hemoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: Reliance on the presence of hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injury limits the value of FAST as a screening diagnostic modality for patients who sustain blunt abdominal trauma.     

CT detection of hepatic and splenic injuries: usefulness of liver window settings

OBJECTIVE. This study was designed to assess the usefulness of liver window settings when performing abdominal CT for the detection and characterization of hepatic and splenic injuries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively evaluated helical abdominal CT scans for hepatic and splenic injuries in 300 consecutive patients with blunt abdominal trauma over a 4-month period. There were 204 males and 96 females with a mean age of 34 years (age range, 1-87 years). For each patient, initial CT diagnosis of hepatic or splenic injury was made from images obtained with standard abdominal window settings. CT scans were then immediately reinterpreted using additional images obtained at narrow window width (liver windows). Changes in conspicuity and characterization of injury were recorded. All CT examinations were performed with helical 7-mm collimation at a pitch of 1.5 after oral ingestion of diluted barium and during bolus IV administration of 125 mL of ioversol at a rate of 2-3 mL/sec. RESULTS. We detected hepatic or splenic injuries in 34 patients (11.3%). There were 19 hepatic injuries and 18 splenic injuries. Three patients had injuries to both liver and spleen. Conspicuity of hepatic or splenic injuries was mildly increased (+1 H) on liver windows in 16 patients, whereas the injury was equally conspicuous on both liver window and standard window images in 19 cases. In no case did review of the liver windows result in a change in grade of injury or reveal an injury that was not seen on standard abdominal window images. The total increased cost for printing liver windows was $5748. CONCLUSION. Routine use of liver window settings for abdominal CT in trauma patients has little clinical usefulness and is not cost-effective.     

实验兔钝性肝损伤的CT动态增强表现

目的 探讨CT动态增强扫描在兔钝性肝损伤(rabbit hepatic injury,BHI)模型中的诊断价值.方法 新西兰大白兔40只,采用钢球自由落体对剑突直接撞击,建立兔BHI模型.采用美国通用(GE)公司Hispeed双螺旋CT机行肝脏平扫及增强,注射对比剂开始后8～10 s、35～40 s、120～150 s分别为肝动脉期、门脉期及平衡期.观察增强前后损伤的位置、范围、边界、肝包膜撕裂、有无活动性出血、主要肝静脉有无受累及腹腔积血的CT特征,并与大体解剖情况对比.结果 动态增强扫描显示率明显高于平扫,单一撕裂13只,多发性撕裂伤18只,肝包膜下血肿7处,肝实质内血肿9处,肝包膜裂口17只25处,活动性出血9处,主要肝静脉损伤5处;与大体解剖符合情况分别为13/13(只),18/18(只),7/9(处),9/9(处),25/30(处),9/5(处),5/4(处).按Moore分级,CT/剖腹探查结果分别为:Ⅰ级5/4只,Ⅱ级15/13只,Ⅲ级9/11只,Ⅳ级6/6只,Ⅴ级1/2只,Ⅵ级0只.结论 动态CT增强扫描尤其静脉期和平衡期对明确有无肝脏损伤及判断损伤程度具有重要的价值.     

Liver trauma due to penetrating lesions: miscellanea, personal case series, clinical and CT findings

PURPOSE: Penetrating liver wounds are related to many causes and rank second after blunt abdominal and liver trauma. We will report the clinical and radiological findings of our personal series of patients with penetrating trauma, especially by firearms and stab and cut wounds. We will also try to define the diagnostic workup of these traumas, which is especially based on CT signs of liver damage and associated changes and which is of basic importance for following treatment, both surgical or conservative. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the last seven years we retrospectively reviewed 31 cases of penetrating liver trauma. The patients were 19 men and 12 women, ranging in age 18 to 73 (mean 42), with penetrating liver injuries from firearms (16 patients) and stab (9 cases) wounds; 6 patients had injuries from different causes. Abdominal CT was carried out in emergency with the CT Angiography (CTA) technique in all patients. In the patients with suspected chest and abdomen involvement CT was performed from the mid-chest for accurate assessment of diaphragm and lung bases and to exclude associated pleuropulmonary damage. RESULTS: Penetrating liver wounds were caused by firearms in 70% of cases, by stabbing in 12% and, in the extant 18%, by other causes such as home accidents, road and work traumas, and liver biopsy. In our series, the liver was most frequently involved, especially by firearms wounds; in our 16 cases the most frequent injuries were hemorrhagic tears. We found bullets in the liver in 6 cases. In one case of home accident the patient wounded himself while slicing bread with a long knife, which cut into the anterior abdominal wall and tore the anterior liver capsule, as seen at CTA. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating wounds to liver and abdomen are less frequent than those to the chest. In the past decade the use of CT has changed the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to such injuries completely, decreasing the resort to explorative laparotomy and hepatorrhaphy. Indeed, CT provides a clear picture of the extent and severity of damage, which permits to choose a conservative treatment in case of intraparenchymal hematomas and lacerocontusive foci without hemoperitoneum, which can be followed-up with physical and CT examinations. Moreover, Helical CT could provide the early diagnosis of active bleeding in the peritoneum and of focal bleeding in the liver, thus permitting prompt hepatorrhaphy or targeted hepatectomy. A diaphragm injury suspected at CT should always prompt the surgeon to intervention, especially when hemothorax, lung base pneumothorax, large liver hematoma or tear of the liver dome are associated. Finally, subdiaphragmatic free gas indicates gut perforation associated with liver damage, in which case surgery is necessary too.     

Computed tomography in hepatic trauma

Twenty-five patients with hepatic injury from blunt upper abdominal trauma were examined by computed tomography (CT). The spectrum of CT findings was recorded, and the size of the hepatic laceration and the associated hemoperitoneum were correlated with the mode of therapy used in each case (operative vs. nonoperative). While the need for surgery correlated roughly with the size of the hepatic laceration, the size of the associated hemoperitoneum was an important modifying factor. Fifteen patients with hepatic lacerations but little or no hemoperitoneum were managed nonoperatively. CT seems to have significant advantages over hepatic scintigraphy, angiography, and diagnostic peritoneal lavage. By combining information on the clinical state of the patient and CT findings, therapy of hepatic injury can be individualized and the incidence of nontherapeutic laparotomies decreased.     

Bowel and mesenteric injury following blunt abdominal trauma: evaluation with CT

Computed tomography (CT) used in cases of blunt abdominal trauma has been found sensitive in detection of bowel and mesenteric injuries and discrimination of operable from nonoperable candidates. In 51 patients with suspected bowel or mesenteric injury following blunt abdominal trauma, CT correctly depicted bowel hematoma or mesenteric injury in 17 of 19 nonoperable patients (89%) and severe injuries in one patient who died preoperatively. In 26 of 28 patients who underwent therapeutic laparotomy (93%), initial CT enabled identification of surgically confirmed injuries. In two cases, initial scan misinterpretation delayed diagnosis of serious bowel injuries. The correct interpretation was rendered preoperatively and at blind retrospective review. CT findings that correlated with bowel or mesenteric injury requiring surgery were free peritoneal fluid (27 of 28, 96%), mesenteric infiltration (24 of 28, 86%), thick-walled bowel (17 of 28, 61%), associated abdominal injuries (12 of 28, 43%), and free air (nine of 28, 32%). In nonoperable cases, CT scans demonstrated bowel thickening (84%) but less frequently peritoneal fluid (21%), mesenteric infiltration (26%), or associated injuries (5%). In three of four patients who underwent nontherapeutic laparotomy, preoperative CT correctly imaged the limited abdominal injuries.     

Injury patterns in peacekeeping missions: the Kosovo experience

Proper medical deployment planning requires projecting injuries. For this reason, the injury patterns and mechanism of injury were reviewed for an 18-month period in Kosovo, and injury rates and mechanisms were extracted for review. Overall, there were 404 trauma patients treated during the study period. Isolated head and neck injuries accounted for 29.5% (119) of injuries, chest wounds 5.7% (23), abdominal wounds 4.5% (18), and extremities 33.4% (135). Multiply injured patients accounted for the remaining 27.0% (109). When subdivided by mechanism, penetrating injury made up 36.9% (149), whereas blunt trauma accounted for 63.1% (255). Motor vehicle accidents made up the majority of blunt trauma (72.2%). Of penetrating injuries, gunshot wounds accounted for 55%, blast wounds 38%, and stabbings 6.7%. The data clearly demonstrate that humanitarian and peacekeeping missions require preparation for a wide variety of mechanisms of injury beyond the typical penetrating trauma of combat situations.     

Penetrating renal trauma: CT evaluation

Mandatory surgical exploration of penetrating renal injuries has been advocated for adequate assessment and repair of renal and retroperitoneal injuries. We evaluated 27 consecutive patients with deep stab wounds of the flank and back who were thought to be at risk for renal injury. Twenty-two patients were studied by CT, 11 by excretory urography, and three by angiography. No correlation was found between the presence and amount of hematuria and the extent of renal injury. Excretory urography was also of little use; the extent of renal parenchymal injury was underestimated, overestimated, or indeterminate in many cases. Computed tomography gave an accurate assessment of the extent of parenchymal damage, perirenal hemorrhage, extravasation of urine, and extrarenal injuries. Angiography was rarely required to better define renal vascular injuries. Only seven patients required surgical repair; the 20 patients managed nonoperatively included seven patients with renal lacerations considered minor by CT evaluation. We conclude that most patients with penetrating trauma do not require surgical exploration. The combination of clinical and CT criteria allows confident management in almost all cases. Computed tomography should be the primary diagnostic study in patients with penetrating back or flank trauma judged to be at risk for renal or other retroperitoneal injury.     

Evaluation of abdominal trauma by computed tomography

Computed tomography (CT) was used in the evaluation of 100 patients suffering abdominal trauma. The type of trauma was blunt in 78 patients, penetrating in eight, and iatrogenic in 14. Forty per cent of cases had normal CT scans, while 60% showed substantial abdominal or retroperitoneal injuries. Surgery, clinical follow-up, and repeated radiologic examinations confirmed the accuracy of CT, and there were no cases in which medical or surgical management was inappropriately guided by CT. A wide variety of injuries was detected, including 19 splenic, eight hepatic, six pancreatic, 13 renal, 13 retroperitoneal or abdominal wall, and one intraperitoneal. CT has major advantages over plain radiography, radionuclide imaging, and angiography in assessment of trauma-induced injuries.     

Posterior abdominal stab wounds: role of CT evaluation

Stab wounds to the back present a diagnostic problem, since missed occult abdominal injuries can lead to serious morbidity. In a prospective study of 205 patients, the authors evaluated the usefulness of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in assessment of low-velocity penetrating injury to the back. CT results were classified into three groups. Category 1 included injuries limited to superficial subcutaneous tissue (n = 174); category 2, injuries to the retroperitoneal compartment (n = 18); and category 3, injuries within the peritoneal cavity (n = 13). Fifty patients underwent surgery, including 30 with category 1 injuries, nine with category 2 injuries, and eleven with category 3 injuries. CT categorization of injury, compared with surgical findings in these 50 patients, had a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 93%. The CT interpretation was considered correct if it demonstrated peritoneal penetration or retroperitoneal injury potentially requiring surgery. The remaining 155 patients were managed nonoperatively, and none had late complications. Abdominal CT is a reliable diagnostic tool in the evaluation of penetrating injury to the back.     

CT in hepatic injuries

Twenty-one patients with hepatic injuries from blunt abdominal trauma were examined by Computed Tomography (CT). CT findings were correlated with those of plain X-ray films (5), radionuclide scanning (5), US (8), angiography (2), and with the findings of laparoscopy (2), exploratory laparotomy (6), and autopsy (2). CT well defines entity and severity of hepatic injuries, easily distinguishing minor from major ones. Moreover CT, by allowing the measurement of attenuation values, allows the various components of traumatic lesions (blood, clots, necrosis) to be recognized. CT is also useful in monitoring the healing patterns and in following the patients for late complications--e.g., abscess and biloma. After comparing it with other radiological investigation techniques, the authors emphasize the role of CT in defining both type and severity of liver injuries and in helping choose the better therapeutic approach (surgical or conservative). Thanks to its short execution time, to its reproducibility and to its allowing the contemporaneous evaluation of intra- and retroperitoneal organs. CT has become the radiological technique of choice in the patients with liver injuries.     

Gallbladder blunt trauma: comparison between radiologic and anatomo-surgical findings

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and the possible role of ultrasonography (US) and Computed Tomography (CT) in a small group of patients who had a blunt abdominal trauma involving the gallbladder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the US and CT findings of five patients with surgically confirmed post-traumatic gallbladder injury. The whole series consisted of 196 consecutive patients submitted to laparotomy for blunt abdominal trauma in the past 7 years. The following US and CT findings were considered at least suggestive of a possible post-traumatic gallbladder injury: pericholecystic fluid collection, ill-defined wall margin, collapsed lumen, high intraluminal density. RESULTS: At surgery, the following findings were observed: gallbladder hematoma (1 case), acute colecystitis (1 cases), gallbladder tear (3 cases), gallbladder tear associated with post-traumatic hepatic injuries (2 cases), duodenal tear (2 cases), hemoperitoneum alone (2 cases), hemoperitoneum associated with choleperitoneum (1 case), choleperitoneum alone (1 case). The US and CT findings were pericholecystic fluid collections (4 cases), ill-defined gallbladder wall margins (3 cases), collapsed lumen with intraluminal high density (1 case) and free intraperitoneal fluid collections (4 cases). They were suggestive of a possible post-traumatic gallbladder injury in all the five patients. CONCLUSIONS: The radiologic findings of our five patients were suggestive of a gallbladder damage but did not permit to distinguish minor from major injuries, the latter requiring surgical treatment. US proves to be a useful screening tool which can also help timing surgery in these patients. CT confirmed the US suspicions and also permitted accurate assessment of associated post-traumatic injuries to the liver and duodenum. Nevertheless, the clinical presentation was the most important factor as to the therapeutic management of these blunt abdominal trauma patients.     

Combined head and abdominal computed tomography for blunt trauma: which patients with minor head trauma benefit most?

The widespread availability of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis and management of blunt trauma has created the possibility of overuse without clear indications. Some clinicians believe that patients with head injury, intoxication, and/or distracting injury have an unreliable abdominal examination and should undergo combined head and abdomen CT. The objective of this study was to evaluate which patients with minor head trauma benefit most from combined head and abdomen CT. Consecutive blunt trauma patients, with a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of 14 or 15, who underwent concomitant head and abdomen CT upon admission to a level I trauma center over a 2-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, physical exam, hospital course, and radiological and laboratory findings were recorded. Patients were divided into four subgroups based upon the presence or absence of intracranial and/or intraabdominal injury detected by CT. Among the 1,478 blunt head trauma patients, only 18 (1%) patients had both head and abdominal injuries detected by combined CT. One-hundred twelve (8%) patients had only head injuries, and 131 (9%) had only intraabdominal injuries detected. Patients with a GCS of 14 were more likely to have isolated head injury [odds ratio (OR) 3.1, P=0.001], while those with loss of consciousness were more likely to have combined head and intraabdominal injury (OR 6.8, P=0.03) or isolated head injury (OR 1.7, P=0.02). Abdominal tenderness was associated with increased risk of isolated intraabdominal injury (OR 1.8, P=0.0015). Hematuria was associated with increased risk of combined head and intraabdominal injury (OR 8.3, P=0.0004) or isolated intraabdominal injury (OR 7.9, P=0.0001). Patients with loss of consciousness and/or GCS of 14 frequently undergo head CT. The addition of an abdomen CT scan in this patient population should be based on objective clinical criteria such as presence of abdominal tenderness and/or hematuria.This work was presented at the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, San Francisco, May 20, 2006.