Quality of life after lung transplantation: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The increase in life expectancy has raised the importance of quality of life after lung transplantation, although this issue has not yet been systematically investigated. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to provide an overview of quality of life in lung transplant patients. METHODS: Between April and July 2001, a set of 4 questionnaires were given to all adult, German-speaking lung transplant recipients (n = 108; response rate 87% [n = 94]): St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), a lung-specific health status instrument; the Short Form-36 (SF-36), a general quality of life measure; the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) and a self-reported questionnaire concerning sexual functioning, physical symptoms, adverse effects of immunosuppression and satisfaction with outcome. RESULTS: With regard to the SGRQ, all lung transplant recipients had significantly better scores, which reflected an enhanced quality of life compared with the reference value for patients with obstructive pulmonary disease (SGRQ: p < 0.001 in all sub-scales). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Mental Component Summary Scale of the SF-36 did not differ significantly compared with published normative data in the healthy population. However, the side effects of immunosuppression proved to be a major factor influencing the quality of life of lung transplant recipients (11% influenced strongly and 24% moderately). Seventy-six percent of lung transplant patients were highly satisfied with the transplant outcome and 92% would opt for the procedure again. Among all lung transplant recipients, those with cystic fibrosis were most satisfied (significantly) with their quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Although lung transplant patients must cope with the side effects of immunosuppression, they report a highly satisfying quality of life with regard to physical and emotional well-being and social and sexual function.     

Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents with Simple Congenital Heart Defects before and after Transcatheter Intervention Therapy: A Single-Center Study

Objective: To explore the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of children and adolescents with simple congenital heart defects before and after the transcatheter intervention.Methods: The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 scale was used to assess the quality of life of 78 children and adolescents before and after the transcatheter intervention and to evaluate the parents’ perception of their children’s quality of life.Results: In all, 76 patients were completed the study. The results showed that the scores of the four dimensions and the total score for the quality of life of the patients significantly improved 1 month after the intervention. At 6 months after treatment, the scores in all dimensions continued to improve. From the parents’ perspective, the scores of the patients in all dimensions improved significantly at 1 month and 6 months after treatment. In terms of the quality of life assessment, the self-assessment results of the patients were more positive than those of their parents.Conclusions: The results showed that the quality of life of children and adolescents with simple congenital heart defects can be positively affected by the transcatheter intervention. Moreover, this improvement is not transient and seems to increase over time.     

Does lung transplantation improve health-related quality of life? The University of Florida experience.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important clinical end-point in evaluating the overall success of lung transplantation. The primary purpose of this study, therefore, was to document the degree of change in HRQoL in a sample of patients evaluated before and after lung transplantation. METHODS: Sixty-six adults who underwent single or bilateral lung transplantation at the University of Florida between March 1994 and May 2001 completed assessments of HRQoL (SF-36 Health Survey, Transplant Symptom Frequency Questionnaire), both before and after transplant. Pre- and post-transplant assessments of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) percent predicted and 6-minute walk test performance were also obtained. RESULTS: HRQoL before transplant was significantly lower than in normative samples of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and adults in the general population. However, repeated measures analyses of co-variance showed significant improvements on 7 of 8 SF-36 sub-scales, as well as the physical component summary and the mental component summary. Improvements in FEV1 percent predicted and 6-minute walk test performance were also found. Patients with longer time since transplantation reported more frequent and problematic symptoms commonly associated with immunosuppression, including depression, headaches and changes in physical appearance, among others. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation appears to yield significant HRQoL benefits for patients. Many patients do, however, experience frequent symptoms associated with immunosuppression that may limit the full benefit of transplantation, and some of these symptoms appear to worsen over time. Future research efforts should focus on the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical interventions designed to optimize HRQoL both before and after lung transplantation.     

Health-Related Quality of Life Before and After a Solid Organ Transplantation (Kidney, Liver, and Lung) of Four Catalonia Hospitals

Introduction and Aims

It has been described that patients who receive a transplant display a better Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). Our objective was to describe the HRQoL before and after a solid organ transplantation, comparing results among various transplantations.

Methods

This HRQoL study using the SF-36 was implemented before as well as at 3 and 12 months posttransplantation. Posttransplantation were compared with pretransplantation scores as well as with the general population.

Results

One hundred sixty-two renal, 159 liver, and 58 lung candidates were included before transplantation, among whom there were 126 renal, 108 liver, and 22 lung recipients. The median age of all transplant recipients was 53 years with 68% men. The various transplant types began with different HRQoL: lung showed the worst, followed by the liver, and then renal. The scores of the SF-36 before and 3 months posttransplantation showed significant improvements, except for “Pair.” At 12 versus 3 months, mental health was somewhat better for renal, and almost all dimensions showed significant improvement for liver and lung patients. All subjects showed clear improvements after transplantation.

Conclusion

All patients showed clear improvements after transplantation when mental health was compared with the general population, particularly lung transplant recipients who expressed the greatest improvement. However, they still showed deficits in physical health.     

Study on health-related quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure before and after transplantation

Our objective was to evaluate health-related quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure on the waiting list for a heart transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed using the EUROQOL-5D questionnaire (EQ-5D) on 38 patients (age: 53 +/- 2 years, 82% men) who were analyzed consecutively during the pretransplant period, as well as at 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation. We excluded pediatric transplants, retransplantations, heart and lung transplantation, and patients scoring below 17 points on the Folstein's Cognitive Mini-Examination. The studied variables included the five dimensions of the EQ-5D test: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain-discomfort, anxiety and depression; a visual analog scale from 0 to 100; and perception of health status. Statistics included analysis of variance and chi-square tests. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: There were significant differences in all tested parameters. The worst values were observed prior to transplantation, with a significant improvement at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with heart failure showed a significant impairment in health-related quality of life before transplantation. The improvement in health-related quality of life was significant and rapidly evident in the posttransplantation period. The most affected dimensions were activities of daily living and pain-discomfort. All dimensions became stable at 3 months, except for anxiety and depression. At 6 to 12 months, a plateau was reached in the feelings of well-being.     

基于手机应用程序的居家用药管理对肺移植受者依从性及生存质量的影响

目的探讨"肺病与移植管理"App结合1日药盒用药法居家用药管理方案对肺移植受者自我管理、用药依从性及生存质量的影响。 方法选取2019年1至6月无锡市人民医院肺移植中心门诊随访的73例肺移植受者进行自我管理、用药依从性及生存质量的问卷调查。成立用药随访管理小组，制订肺移植受者居家用药管理方案。予肺移植受者"肺病与移植管理"APP结合1日药盒用药法居家用药管理方案干预3个月后再次对其进行问卷调查，比较干预前后受者自我管理、自我效能、用药依从性及生存质量差异。采用配对t检验比较"肺病与移植管理"App结合1日药盒用药法居家用药管理方案干预前后肺移植受者自我管理、自我效能、用药依从性和生存质量得分，P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果干预3个月后，受者自我管理、认知性症状管理实践、用药依从性、生存质量及生理方面生存质量得分分别为(37±7)、(16±3)、(7.0±1.0)、(154±26)和(77±14)分，均高于干预前[(33±9)、(13±6)、(6.5±1.1)、(141±30)和(67±17)分]，差异均有统计学意义(t＝-0.609、-3.383、-12.864、-2.818和3.586，P均<0.05)。干预前后受者自我效能、运动锻炼、与医师的沟通、症状管理、疾病共性管理和心理方面生存质量得分差异均无统计学意义(t＝-1.972、-0.609、-1.486、-1.747、-1.746和1.487，P均>0.05)。干预前用药依从性好、中和差受者分别有16、41和16例，干预后分别为27、40和6例。 结论基于移动健康平台制订的居家用药管理方案可提高肺移植受者自我管理、用药依从性及生理方面的生存质量。     

呼吸机依赖患者的肺移植四例

目的探讨呼吸机依赖患者行肺移植手术的可能性。方法对4例呼吸机依赖患者施行了肺移植术，并对患者术前一般情况和术后恢复情况进行分析和比较。结果4例受者分别于术后第22、6、11和6d脱离呼吸机，第71、41、67和35d出院。术后随访，1例单肺移植受者生存25个月后死于慢性排斥反应；其它3例已分别存活13、11和6个月，生活质量明显改善。结论肺移植可有效治疗经选择的呼吸机依赖性肺疾病。     

An economic evaluation of lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained with lung transplantation relative to medical treatment for end-stage lung disease in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Patients on the transplant waiting list were used to represent medical treatment. Four-year national survival data were extrapolated to 15 years by means of parametric techniques. Quality-adjusted life-years were derived by means of utility scores obtained from a cross-section of patients. Resource consumption and costs were based on local and national sources. Costs and benefits were discounted at an annual rate of 6%. RESULTS: Across a 15-year period lung transplantation yielded mean benefits (relative to medical treatment) of 2.1, 3.3, and 3.6 quality-adjusted life-years for single-lung, double-lung, and heart-lung transplantation, respectively. During the same period the mean cost of medical treatment was estimated at $73,564, compared with $176,640, $180,528, and $178,387 for single-lung, double-lung, and heart-lung transplantation, respectively. The costs per quality-adjusted life-year gained were $48,241 for single-lung, $32,803 for double-lung, and $29,285 for heart-lung transplantation. Sensitivity analysis found the principal determinants of cost-effectiveness to be quality of life and maintenance costs after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation results in survival and quality of life gains but remains expensive, with cost-effectiveness limited by substantial mortality and morbidity and high costs. The cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation can be improved with lowered immunosuppression costs and improvements in quality of life after transplantation.     

Health-related quality of life after different types of solid organ transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To describe functional health and health-related quality of life (QOL) before and after transplantation; to compare and contrast outcomes among liver, heart, lung, and kidney transplant patients, and compare these outcomes with selected norms; and to explore whether physiologic performance, demographics, and other clinical variables are predictors of posttransplantation overall subjective QOL. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is increasing demand for outcomes analysis, including health-related QOL, after medical and surgical interventions. Because of the high cost, interest in transplantation outcomes is particularly intense. With technical surgical experience and improved immunosuppression, survival after solid organ transplantation has matured to acceptable levels. More sensitive measures of outcomes are necessary to evaluate further developments in clinical transplantation, including data on objective functional outcome and subjective QOL. METHODS: The Karnofsky Performance Status was assessed objectively for patients before transplantation and up to 4 years after transplantation, and scores were compared by repeated measures analysis of variance. Subjective evaluation of QOL over time was obtained using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS). These data were analyzed using multivariate and univariate analysis of variance. A summary model of health-related QOL was tested by path analysis. RESULTS: Tools were administered to 100 liver, 94 heart, 112 kidney, and 65 lung transplant patients. Mean age at transplantation was 48 years; 36% of recipients were female. The Karnofsky Performance Status before transplantation was 37 +/- 1 for lung, 38 +/- 2 for heart, 53 +/- 3 for liver, and 75 +/- 1 for kidney recipients. After transplantation, the scores improved to 67 +/- 1 at 3 months, 77 +/- 1 at 6 months, 82 +/- 1 at 12 months, 86 +/- 1 at 24 months, 84 +/- 2 at 36 months, and 83 +/- 3 at 48 months. When patients were stratified by initial performance score as disabled or able, both groups merged in terms of performance by 6 months after liver and heart transplantation; kidney transplant patients maintained their stratification 2 years after transplantation. The SF-36 physical and mental component scales improved after transplantation. The PAIS score improved globally. Path analysis demonstrated a direct effect on the posttransplant Karnofsky score by time after transplantation and diabetes, with trends evident for education and preoperative serum creatinine level. Although neither time after transplantation nor diabetes was directly predictive of a composite QOL score that incorporated all 15 subjective domains, recent Karnofsky score and education level were directly predictive of the QOL composite score. CONCLUSIONS: Different types of transplant patients have a different health-related QOL before transplantation. Performance improved after transplantation for all four types of transplants, but the trajectories were not the same. Subjective QOL measured by the SF-36 and the PAIS also improved after transplantation. Path analysis shows the important predictors of health-related QOL. These data provide clearly defined and widely useful QOL outcome benchmarks for different types of solid organ transplants.     

Validation and refinement of the Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients

CONTEXT: The Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients was designed to assess symptoms and activity tolerance in lung transplant recipients during their post-transplant evaluations. The initial psychometric evaluation determined that the questionnaire was clinically useful, reliable, and valid. OBJECTIVE: To report the results of further psychometric analyses in a new, expanded sample of lung transplant recipients and to demonstrate the iterative manner by which instruments are refined and tested. METHODS: Internal consistency, test-retest stability, convergent validity, factorial validity, and group differences attributable to age, gender, and transplant type were determined in a pooled sample of 177 lung transplant recipients. Sensitivity to change over time was measured in a subsample (n = 51) who provided repeated measures data. RESULTS: The Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients and its subscales were internally consistent (Kuder Richardson reliability of 0.73-0.95). Test-retest stability was high (intraclass correlations >0.70). Symptoms showed a significant curvilinear pattern with a tendency to decrease over time before rising again at the 12-month measurement for the total questionnaire (F=6.8, P=.012) and 2 subscales--Respiratory (F=5.6, P=.022) and Activities of Daily Living (F=19.7, P<.001). Convergent construct validity correlations ranged from 0.29 to 0.53 and were consistent with theoretical expectations. Factorial analysis confirmed 3 domains that coincided with the Respiratory, General, and Activities of Daily Living subscales. CONCLUSIONS: The Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients is a reliable and valid measure for assessing physical symptoms and activity intolerance after lung transplantation in individual recipients, recipients in aggregate, and comparison groups, on one occasion and serially over time. These results will guide future refinement and testing of the Questionnaire for Lung Transplant Patients.     

中国肺移植面临的困难及对策

肺移植是治疗多种肺部疾病唯一有效的方法,术后很大程度上能改善患者的生活质量,生存期也得到明显延长。但肺移植与肝肾移植相比,全国除几个大中心以外,大多数中心移植例数较少,手术技术尚不成熟,严重制约了肺移植的发展。经过多年的努力,中国肺移植已经开始起步,且发展迅速,但国内肺移植面临多重困难,亟待制定对策处理。     

Improved lung allograft function after fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease undergoing lung transplantation

OBJECTIVES: Bronchiolitis obliterans is the greatest limitation to the long-term applicability of lung transplantation. Although alloimmune events are important, nonimmune events, such as gastroesophageal reflux, might contribute to lung injury and the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the 396 patients who underwent lung transplantation at the Duke Lung Transplant Program from April 1992 to April 2002. Reflux was assessed for using an ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH probe. RESULTS: Reflux assessment with an esophageal pH probe was obtained in 128 patients after lung transplantation. Abnormal pH study results were present in 93 (73%) patients. Forty-three patients underwent a surgical fundoplication. There was no in-hospital or 30-day mortality in the patients undergoing fundoplication. At the time of fundoplication, 26 patients met the criteria for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. After fundoplication, 16 patients had improved bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome scores, with 13 of these patients no longer meeting the criteria for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. In patients at least 6 months after lung transplantation and 6 months after fundoplication, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved by an average of 24% (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second before fundoplication, 1.87 L; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second after fundoplication, 2.19 L/sec; P <.0002). Overall actuarial survival was significantly better in patients who had either normal pH studies or who had fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is very common after lung transplantation and appears to contribute to mortality and development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Fundoplication in lung transplant recipients with gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with significant improvements in lung function, particularly if performed before the late stages of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.     

Influence of the Psychological State of Relatives on the Quality of Life of Patients at 1 Year After Transplantation

We analyzed the influence of the psychological state of relatives on the quality of life of patients at 1 year after transplantation. We selected 2 groups: 94 transplant patients (47.9% liver, 40.4% kidney, and 11.7% heart) of mean age 49.42 years (SD, 11.21 years) and their close relatives (n = 94). All participants were assessed at 1 year after transplantation, using a Psychological Survey (both groups); the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Quality of Life Questionnaire (transplant patients); and the Leeds Scales for the Self-Assessment of Anxiety and Depression (relatives). The results revealed that transplant patients whose relatives had more symptoms of anxiety and depression at 1 year after transplantation showed a decreased quality of life.     

Perioperative anaesthetic considerations for patients undergoing lung transplantation

Purpose

Five thousand. two hundred and eight lung transplants were performed worldwide before April, 1996. This review will discuss lung transplantation from an historical perspective, its indications, donor and recipient selection criteria, donor lung preparation, surgical considerations, perioperative anaesthetic management, and associated morbidity and mortality.

Source

Recent literature on penoperative anaesthetic management of lung transplantation and experience from international centres including the Toronto Lung Transplant Group and the St. Louis Lung Transplant Group.

Principal findings

Lung transplantation comprises of a family of operations, including single lung transplant, bilateral single lung transplant, lobar transplant and block heart-lung transplant Improved donor lung preservation techniques have increased the duration of cold ischaemic time. The advent of bilateral single lung transplant has decreased the requirement for cardiopulmonary bypass, and airway complications have been reduced by adoption of the telescoping bronchial anastomoses. Advances in perioperative monitoring (including transoesophgeal echocardiography). pulmonary vasodilators (e.g., nitric oxide and prostaglandin E₁), cardiopulmonary bypass and ventilatory management, and a better understanding of the pathophysiological processes during the procedure have improved penoperative anaesthetic management. Also, advances in broad spectrum antibiotics and immunosuppressant drugs have improved the outcome by better management of the complications of infection and rejection.

Conclusion

Lung transplantation improves the quality of life with marginal improvement in life expectancy of the recipients. It is an expensive procedure requinng continued resources for long term management of these patients.     

Lung retransplantation after posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD): a single-center experience and review of literature of PTLD in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Retransplantation in adult lung transplant recipients developing progressive bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome as a consequence of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) therapy has not been reported in the literature. Literature on PTLD after lung transplantation is limited mostly to case reports or small case series, limiting the validity of conclusions. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients at our center. Analysis of pooled data published on lung transplant patients developing PTLD. RESULTS: Two patients who underwent pulmonary retransplants for PTLD have functioning grafts 23 and 36 months postoperatively, with no evidence of PTLD recurrence. Review and analysis of published data and from our center revealed that incidence of PTLD, proportion of patients with thoracic involvement, and proportion of patients who were Epstein-Barr virus seronegative before transplantation decreased continuously as a function of time from transplant. Patients developing PTLD within the first 6 months after transplantation had a clinically distinct pattern of PTLD and a significantly better survival than patients developing PTLD more than 6 months after lung transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Lung retransplantation can be considered after careful selection for lung transplant recipients developing bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome as a consequence of reduced immunosuppression for PTLD. Acquisition of PTLD and pattern of organ involvement is a continuous process as a function of time. Defining "early PTLD" as occurring in the first 6 months more accurately predicts progress and prognosis of this disease than the traditional 1 year definition of early vs late onset PTLD.     

肾移植患者社会支持与生活质量的相关性研究

采用社会支持自评量表（ＰＲＱ－８５）第二部分和肾移植患者生活质量指数自评量表，以随机抽样法对接受明移植３个月以上来门诊复查的患者进行问卷调查。结果：肾移植患者的社会支持与我高，二者之间有非常显著的正性关系（Ｐ〈０．００１）。提示：患者的生活质量在很大程度上取决于社会支持的程度，医务人员在工作中要特别重视其社会属性，尽可能调动社会支持系统从各个维度对患者起作用，以提高其生活质量。     

Lung Transplantation in Children. Specific Aspects

Lung transplantation has become in recent years a therapeutic option for infants with terminal lung disease with similar results to transplantation in adults. In Spain, since 1996 114 children lung transplants have been performed; this corresponds to 3.9% of the total transplant number. The most common indication in children is cystic fibrosis, which represents between 70-80% of the transplants performed in adolescents. In infants common indications are interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension. In most children a sequential double lung transplant is performed, generally with the help of extracorpo-real circulation. Lung transplantation in children presents special challenges in monitoring and follow-up, especially in infants, given the difficulty in assessing lung function and performing transbronchial biopsies.There are some more specific complications in children like postransplant lymphoproliferative syndrome or a greater severity of respiratory virus infections. After lung transplantation children usually experiment a very important improvement in their quality of life. Eighty eight per cent of children have no limitations in their activity after 3 years of transplantation. According to the registry of the International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) survival at 5 years of transplantation is 54% and at 10 years is around 35%.     

Caregivers of lung transplant candidates: do they benefit when the patient is receiving psychological services?

BACKGROUND: We recently demonstrated that a targeted psychological intervention has quality of life, mood, and social intimacy benefits for patients awaiting lung transplantation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the patient's participation in treatment on caregiver functioning. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: Caregivers of patients participating in a randomized clinical trial designed to compare 2 telephone-based psychological interventions completed outcome measures at baseline and at 1 and 3 months after patients completed treatment. Patients were randomized to receive either supportive therapy (emotional and educational support) or quality-of-life therapy (a cognitive-behavioral intervention that provided specific intervention strategies to boost happiness and satisfaction in life domains that compromise overall quality of life). Caregivers did not participate directly in the interventions. Setting and Participants-Participants were 28 caregivers from a large lung transplant center in the southeastern United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of life (Quality of Life Inventory), mood disturbance (Profile of Mood States-Short Form), and social intimacy (Miller Social Intimacy Scale). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers reported higher quality of life and lower mood disturbance scores, and comparable social intimacy scores relative to the patients for whom they were caring. Caregivers whose patients received quality-of-life therapy reported vicarious gains in quality of life, mood disturbance, and social intimacy, relative to those whose patients received support therapy. Finally, the degree of change in patients' quality of life, mood disturbance, and social intimacy contributed significantly to predicting caregivers' functioning at the 3-month follow-up assessment. These findings suggest that telephone-based quality-of-life therapy has beneficial effects that extend beyond patients to their caregivers.