In vitro antibacterial effects of the dentin primer of Clearfil Protect Bond.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial effects of the dentin primer of a commercially available self-etching adhesive system, Clearfil Protect Bond, which contains antibacterial monomer 12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB). METHODS: Inhibitory effects against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus casei, or Actinomyces naeslundii were examined by an agar-disc diffusion method using the Clearfil Protect Bond primer containing 5% MDPB and an acidic adhesion-promoting monomer MDP, the primer only with MDP, and the primer with 1% cetylpyridinium chloride. The minimum inhibitory/bactericidal concentrations (MIC/MBC) of each primer for the three bacterial species were determined by serial microdilution assays. For testing the bactericidal effects seen in dentin, the primer was applied to demineralized dentin blocks in which S. mutans had been impregnated, and numbers of viable bacteria were counted. RESULTS: For all three bacteria, the sizes of the inhibition zones produced by Clearfil Protect Bond primer were significantly greater than for the other primers (p<0.05, ANOVA and Scheffe's F-test). The MIC/MBC values of Clearfil Protect Bond primer were less than those of the primer without MDPB, and comparable to those of the primer containing cetylpyridinium chloride. No bacterial recovery was obtained after application of Clearfil Protect Bond primer to the bacteria-impregnated dentin, although the primer without MDPB showed some bactericidal effect. SIGNIFICANCE: Clearfil Protect Bond primer has strong antibacterial activity based upon MDPB against S. mutans, L. casei and A. naeslundii, and the capability to disinfect cavities containing residual bacteria.     

pH changes of self-etching primers mixed with powdered dentine

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the pH changes of self-etching primers mixed with dentine powder. METHODS: Four self-etching primer adhesive systems were used: Clearfil SE Bond, Imperva Fluoro Bond, Mac Bond II, and Unifil Bond. Dentine discs obtained from extracted bovine incisors were milled and pulverized into a fine powder. The dentine powder was then mixed with solutions of self-etching primers diluted with distilled water. The pH changes of the primer-dentine powder mixtures were measured by a solid-state pH sensor connected to a pH meter at time points 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180, 300, and 600 s after the start of mixing. Data were analyzed by the Tukey HSD test and the Dunnett test at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The baseline pH values of the self-etching primers ranged from 1.83 to 2.34, with Mac Bond II exhibiting a significantly lower value than the other three products. After mixing with the dentine powder, the pH values significantly increased, ranging from 6.95 to 7.37 at 600 s after mixing; there were no significant differences in these values among the self-etching primers used. An insoluble precipitate was formed in the case of Clearfil SE Bond, indicating a chemical reaction between the functional monomer and the dentine powder. CONCLUSIONS: The dentine has a strong buffering capacity against the acidity of self-etching primers.     

Bonding of acid-etch and self-etch adhesives to human fluorosed dentine

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our laboratory study was to determine the bonding efficacy of two-step self-etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond), all-in-one adhesive (Clearfil Tri S Bond) and acid-etching system (Single Bond) to human fluorosed dentine. METHODS: Forty-eight human molars were grouped according to modified Thylstrup-Fejerskov index (TFI) into normal (N, TFI 0), mild fluorosis (ML, TFI 1-3) and moderate fluorosis (MD, TFI 4-6). Superficial dentine was exposed and ground with 600-grit silicon carbide paper. Teeth of each group were randomly divided into three sub-groups. Each sub-group was treated with one of the three bonding systems. A resin composite was built up on the bonded surfaces and stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24h. They were serially sectioned in buccal-lingual direction into 0.7-1.0mm thick slabs. Slices were trimmed for microtensile bond test and stressed in tension at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA (p=0.05). The adhesive/dentine interfaces of the bonded specimens were examined by a FE-SEM. RESULTS: Significantly higher microtensile bond strength (microTBS) was found with Clearfil SE Bond to mild fluorosed dentine than did Single Bond and Clearfil Tri S Bond. Lower microTBS were found for Single Bond (not significant) and Clearfil Tri S Bond than Clearfil SE Bond with moderately fluorosed dentine. Thickness of the hybrid layer produced by Clearfil SE Bond in mild and moderately fluorosed groups was less than with normal dentine. CONCLUSION: Two-step self-etching system, Clearfil SE Bond, showed a higher bonding performance to fluorosed dentine than Single Bond and Tri S Bond.     

ElectroBond application may improve wetting characteristics of etched dentine

Objective

To assess the efficacy of an electrically assisted application technique on dentine wettability (water contact angle measurements) and to determine the promoted surface roughness of dentine after applying 37% phosphoric acid etching, a self-etching primer or a self-etching adhesive system.

Methods

Wettability was assessed on 30 caries-free extracted human third molars. Specimens were sectioned parallel to the occlusal surface to expose moderately deep dentine and ground flat (water-wet 180-grit SiC) to provide uniform flat surfaces. 37% H₃PO₄, Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB) primer or Prompt-L-Pop (PLP) adhesive system were applied on dentine surfaces. In half of the specimens, the electric impulse-assisted application technique/ElectroBond-assisted application was followed. Contact angle measurements were performed to assess wettability using the Axisymmetric Drop Shape Analysis technique. Additional surfaces were conditioned for atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis. Two-way ANOVA, Student's t and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were performed (P < 0.05).

Results

PLP-treated dentine showed the highest intertubular roughness and the lowest dentine wettability. ElectroBond application reduced water contact angles when dentine was treated with H₃PO₄ or Clearfil SE Bond primer, but not when dentine was treated with PLP.

Conclusions

The use of electric current improved wettability of dentine surface following application of phosphoric acid and a mild self-etch primer, but not self-etch adhesive.     

Detection of acid diffusion through bovine dentine after adhesive application

AIM: Acidic diffusion through bovine dentine was investigated by measuring pH changes on dentine surfaces after applying three adhesive systems. METHODOLOGY: Coronal incisor bovine dentine discs, 0.5 mm thick, were prepared from dentine close to the pulp chamber. A single-bottle adhesive system-Single Bond, a self-etching primer system-Clearfil SE Bond and an 'all-in-one' adhesive system-AQ Bond were used. The labial dentine surfaces were conditioned as follows: Single Bond groups: (SB-1) 35% phosphoric acid etchant was applied and left in place; (SB-2) the etchant was applied for 15 s and rinsed off for 10 s; (SB-3) application of adhesive agent and light curing following step SB-2; Clearfil SE Bond groups: (SE-1) SE primer was applied for 20 s and dried; (SE-2) application of adhesive agent and light curing following step SE-1; AQ Bond groups: (AQ-1) AQ Bond adhesive was applied for 20 s and dried, applied for additional 5 s and dried again; (AQ-2) light curing following step AQ-1. The pH change on the pulpal dentine surface was measured using a pH-imaging microscope. RESULTS: All the Single Bond groups revealed a lower pH on the pulpal surface (pH 6.25, 6.59 and 6.64 for SB-1, SB-2 and SB-3, respectively) compared with intact dentine. Clearfil SE Bond and AQ Bond groups showed no significant deference in pH value from intact dentine. CONCLUSIONS: Acid diffusion from phosphoric acid etching was observed when placed on 0.5 mm-thick dentine discs; however, there was only limited evidence of acid diffusion from SE primer and AQ Bond.     

Morphological categorization of acid-base resistant zones with self-etching primer adhesive systems

This study investigated the influence of the composition of self-etching primer adhesive systems on the morphology of acid-base resistant zones (ABRZs). One-step self-etching primer systems (Clearfil Tri-S Bond, G-Bond, and One-Up Bond F Plus) and two-step self-etching primer systems (Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, UniFil Bond, and Mac Bond II) were used in this study. Each adhesive was applied on prepared dentin disk surfaces, and a resin composite was placed between two dentin disks. All resin-bonded specimens were subjected to acid-base challenge. Observation under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) revealed the creation of an ABRZ adjacent to the hybrid layer for all the self-etch primer adhesive systems, even when non-fluoride releasing adhesives were used. The presence of fluoride in two-step self-etching adhesive significantly increased the thickness of ABRZ created. Results suggested that an ABRZ was created with the use of self-etching primer adhesive systems, but its morphology differed between one-and two-step self-etching primer adhesive systems and was influenced by fluoride release activity.     

Antibacterial properties of self-etching dental adhesive systems

BACKGROUND: Dental adhesives with antibacterial properties may reduce recurrent or secondary caries. The authors conducted a study to examine the immediate and long-lasting antibacterial properties of four self-etching adhesive systems. METHODS: The authors used the agar diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT) to measure the antibacterial properties of AdheSe (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany), Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan) and Xeno III (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) on Streptoccocus mutans after aging samples in phosphate-buffered saline for one, two, seven and 14 days. RESULTS: Only Clearfil Protect Bond showed an inhibition halo in the ADT. In the DCT, fresh samples of all of the tested materials exhibited potent antibacterial properties, which were maintained by AdheSe for one day and Clearfil Protect Bond for seven days. None of the adhesive systems exhibited any antibacterial properties after 14 days. CONCLUSIONS: All of the tested adhesives had an immediate bactericidal effect on S. mutans. None, however, had long-lasting antibacterial properties. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The application of self-etching adhesive materials could contribute to the immediate elimination of residual bacteria. The likelihood of developing secondary caries as a consequence of bacterial microleakage may not be affected by the use of the adhesive systems tested in this study.     

Antimicrobial properties of self-etching primer-bonding systems

Self-etching primers are now considered the new generation of dentin bonding systems that modify and incorporate the bacteria-containing smear layer into their bonding mechanism. The antibacterial effects of the self-etching primers Clearfil SE Bond, Mac Bond, Imperva FL Bond, One-Up BondF and Prompt L-Pop were evaluated using the bacteria Streptococcus mutans ATCC25175, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Peptostreptococcus prevotii, Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus catenaforme, Lactobacillus jensenii, Actinomyces odontolyticus, Porphyromonas endodontalis, Clostridium ramosum, Prevotella oris, Prevotella denticola and Fusobacterium nucleatum, with a disk diffusion method. A single-bottle total-etch dentin adhesive (Excite) was used for comparisons and chlorhexidine (0.2%) was used as the positive control. After incubation, zones of inhibited bacterial growth were observed. One-Up BondF, Prompt L-Pop and Excite showed growth inhibition for all bacterial strains. The bonding agents of Clearfil SE Bond, Mac Bond and Imperva FL Bond were unable to inhibit the growth of Lactobacillus jensenii and Actinomyces odontolyticus, while the primers of these systems produced inhibition halos to all tested microorganisms greater than that of chlorhexidine.     

Penetration of an antibacterial dentine-bonding system into demineralized human root dentine in vitro

In this study, the penetration of three proprietary dentine-bonding agents (Prime & Bond 2.1, Single Bond, Liner Bond 2) and experimental dentine-bonding systems incorporating an antibacterial monomer, 12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB), into artificial root caries lesions was evaluated, and the bactericidal activity of each material against Streptococcus mutans or Lactobacillus casei impregnated into demineralized dentine blocks was assessed. All of the commercial dentine-bonding agents were capable of penetrating into the artificial carious lesions to more than 150 microm. The depth of penetration of the experimental systems, which were based on Liner Bond 2, was not significantly different from that of their parent product. Liner Bond 2 primer exhibited the greatest bactericidal effects among the three proprietary dentine-bonding agents tested. Bactericidal activities of experimental primers containing MDPB were greater than those of any other products, and the application of 4% MDPB-containing primer resulted in complete killing of bacteria in demineralized dentine. The results indicate that the penetration of dentine-bonding agents into extensively demineralized root dentine is possible in vitro, and the experimental dentine-bonding systems containing the antibacterial monomer MDPB are capable of killing bacteria within demineralized dentine. This could be of benefit when managing root caries lesions.     

Antibacterial activities of MDPB and fluoride in dentin bonding agents

The aim of this study was to compare in vitro antibacterial activity of MDPB containing bonding system ABF with activities of three Fluoride containing bonding systems (Fuji Bond LC (FBLC), Prime&Bond NT (PBNT), and FluoroBond (FLB). Two bacterial strains were tested: Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus. The study was performed on Muller Hinton Agar by Agar Well Technique. The bacterial agar was evenly distributed over the surface of petri dishes. Standard wells were punched into the agar. The test materials were placed in the wells of Muller Hinton agar plates, inoculated with Streptococcus mutans NCTC10449 and Lactobacillus acidophilus. The diameters of inhibition zones produced around the materials were measured after 24 h of incubation at 37 +/- 1 degrees C. For statistical analysis, Duncan's multiple range test was used. The primers of bonding agents were highly effective against to Streptococcus mutans. The MDPB containing primer of ABF Bond produced the greatest inhibition zones against to Lactobacillus acidophilus. It was followed by FLB primer. Lactobacillus acidophilus was resistant to FBLC primer and bonding, ABF, PBNT and FLB bonding agents. The results of this study indicated that, incorporation of MDPB in primer of self-etch system increased its antibacterial activity especially against to Lactobacillus acidophilus. However, all bonding systems except for bonding agent of ABF showed some antibacterial activity against to Streptococcus mutans.     

Effect of two-step adhesive systems on inhibition of secondary caries around fluoride-releasing resin composite restorations in root dentine

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of two-step adhesive systems on secondary caries inhibition around fluoride-releasing materials in vitro. METHODS: Two self-etching primer systems, Clearfil SE Bond (SE) and UniFil Bond (UB), and two one-bottle systems with a total-etch wet-bonding technique, Single Bond (SB) and One-Step (OS), were used prior to placement of resin composites either with (Reactmer) or without (Z100) fluoride release. Class V cavities prepared in extracted human premolars were restored with various combinations of materials: Reactmer/SE, Reactmer/UB, Reactmer/SB, Reactmer/OS, Z100/SE, Z100/UB, Z100/SB and Z100/OS. After storage for 14 days, the restored teeth were incubated in bacterial medium containing sucrose with Streptoccus mutans for 2 weeks. Water sorption and desorption of the adhesives and fluoride release from the resins either coated with adhesive or uncoated were also determined. RESULTS: The one-bottle groups showed higher water sorption and desorption than the self-etching primer groups. Although fluoride release from the Reactmer specimens was suppressed by the adhesive coating, the one-bottle groups allowed significantly higher fluoride release than the self-etching primer groups. On microradiographs, the radio-opaque layers adjacent to the Reactmer restorations were thick and clear, while the layers adjacent to the Z100 restorations were thin and unclear. For the Reactmer restorations, the radio-opaque layers associated with the one-bottle groups were significantly thicker than for the self-etching primer groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that the use of one-bottle wet-bonding systems for bonding of fluoride-releasing resin composites to dentine may contribute to inhibit secondary caries compared to self-etching primer systems.     

Physiochemical interactions at the interfaces between self-etch adhesive systems and dentine

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to provide direct and comprehensive information regarding morphology, quality and chemistry of the interfaces between three self-etching primers/adhesives and dentine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The occlusal one-third of the crown was removed from 18 unerupted human third molars. The prepared dentine surfaces were randomly selected for treatment with one of three commercial self-etching bonding agents according to manufacturers' instructions. One two-step self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) and two one-step self-etching adhesives (One-Up Bond F and Prompt L-Pop) were selected. Five-micron-thick sections of adhesive/dentine interface specimens were cut and stained with Goldner's trichrome for light microscopy. Companion slabs were analysed with micro-Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: It was shown that the difference in aggressiveness of these three contemporary self-etching systems produced different thickness of hybrid layer. Staining technique showed a distinct coloured line/zone at the adhesive/dentine interfaces for all three bonding systems. The width of this line varied, and was approximately 1, 1-2, 2-3 microm for Clearfil SE Bond, One-Up Bond F and Prompt L-Pop, respectively. The colour differences in the stained interface sections, which is reflected by the extent to which the adhesive encapsulates the demineralised dentine matrix, indicated that collagen fibrils at the interfaces were not totally encased in all three self-etching adhesives. Raman results showed that Prompt L-Pop is the most aggressive systems in this study. It almost totally demineralised the 2-microm deep subsurface dentine, while Clearfil SE is mild, only partially demineralised the first micron deep dentine. CONCLUSIONS: The complementary techniques, i.e. SEM, staining and micro-Raman spectroscopy, hold considerable promise for comprehensive physicochemical characterisation of self-etching adhesive/dentine interfaces. In comparison with two-step self-etching system, the aggressive one-step system produces more complex interfaces.     

Antibacterial activity of different generation dentin-bonding systems.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the antibacterial activities of different generation dentin-bonding systems. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The antibacterial activities of dentin-bonding systems Optibond FL Primer, Single Bond, Clearfil SE Bond Primer, and Prompt-L-Pop were evaluated against Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus salivarius, Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Cervitec (1% chlorhexidine varnish) was also examined as a positive control material. Disk diffusion tests with filter paper disks (n = 10) containing a drop of each material (20 microL) were used. After incubation at 37 degrees C for 48 hours, the growth inhibition zones were measured in millimeters. RESULTS: Of all the materials tested, Optibond FL Primer, Clearfil SE Bond Primer, and Prompt-LPop showed larger growth inhibition zones than the control material for all bacterial strains. No antibacterial effect was noted for Single Bond. The results indicated that Optibond FL Primer had the strongest effect against the S mutans and L casei, and Clearfil SE Bond Primer produced the largest inhibition zone for S salivarius and L acidophilus among the test materials. CONCLUSION: The antibacterial effects observed for the tested different generation dentin-bonding systems may be related to the acidic nature of the materials.     

Regional bond strength of four self-etching primer/adhesive systems to root canal dentin

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the regional bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to root canal dentin using four self-etching primer/adhesive systems. Post spaces were prepared in extracted premolars, and their root canal dentin was treated with one of the following self-etching primer/adhesive systems: ED Primer II and Clearfil Photobond, photo-cure/dual-cure systems of Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, or Clearfil SE Bond. Post spaces were filled with the dual-cure resin core material, and microtensile bond strength (microTBS) at the coronal and apical regions was measured after 24-hour storage. There were no regional differences in microTBS of the photo-cure and dual-cure systems of Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, while microTBS at the coronal region of Photobond and SE Bond groups were higher than those at the apical region. At the apical region, photo-cured Clearfil Liner Bond 2V exhibited significantly higher bond strength than those of the other systems.     

Influence of water-storage time on the sorption and solubility behavior of current adhesives and primer/adhesive mixtures

This study evaluated the effects of water-storage on the water sorption and solubility behavior of five commercially available dental adhesive systems and two primer/adhesive mixtures. The adhesives comprised three different approaches to bonding to hard tooth tissues: a one-step self-etching adhesive (One-up Bond F), two two-step self-etching primers (Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil Protect Bond) and two etch-and-rinse systems: a water/ethanol-based (Single Bond) and an acetone-based filled adhesive (Prime&Bond NT). The bonding agents and primers of the two-step self-etching systems were mixed in a 1:1 volume ratio. Water sorption and solubility values were determined after 1, 7, 30, 90 and 180 days. The results showed that, except for SB, all adhesives presented increased water sorption with increased storage time. The one-step self-etching adhesive and self-etching primer/adhesive mixtures presented the highest water sorption and solubility values. Equilibrium in the water sorption values was observed for all adhesives after 90 days of water-storage. However, solubility values continued to increase for some materials until 180 days. The sorption and solubility behavior of the materials tested seem to be related to hydrophilicity of the adhesive resin solution and might influence the long-term performance of resin-based composite restorations.     

Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding

Human enamel, with its prismatic, rod-like apatitic morphology, is an anisotropic material. Because of this structural anisotropy, variation in enamel bonding sites might influence the bonding ability of current adhesive systems. This study investigated the effects of regional enamel and the direction of enamel sectioning on the bonding ability of two commercially available resin adhesives: a self-etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond) and a one-bottle adhesive system intended for use with a total-etch wet bonding technique (Single Bond). Two regions of enamel, cuspal and mid-coronal enamel, were chosen, then sectioned in three different directions, horizontally, axially and tangentially. Slices of the sectioned enamel were then bonded with each adhesive system and submitted to a micro-shear bond test. The results of a micro-shear bond testing showed that the bonding of a one-bottle adhesive system (Single Bond) to enamel was high at the surface perpendicular to the enamel prisms (40 MPa to 51 MPa) and low at the surface parallel to the enamel prisms (24 MPa to 27 MPa). In the case of a self-etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond), 35 MPa to 45 MPa bond strengths were obtained from all surfaces. The bond strengths of the two adhesive systems were significantly influenced by the anisotropic structure of enamel (p < 0.05). However, the effect of a self-etching primer system was less influenced by the orientation of the prismatic structure of enamel than that of a one-bottle adhesive system (p < 0.05). SEM and CLSM microphotographs showed that the self-etching primer effectively modified the smear layer without being excessively destructive to the enamel.     

Influence of enamel wetness on resin composite restorations using various dentine bonding agents: part I-effects on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of enamel wetness on marginal quality and enamel microcrack formation using various dentine bonding adhesives; and to determine the changes of marginal quality and enamel microcracks over time. METHODS: Forty extracted molars were each prepared with a cylindrical cavity and divided into five groups. Groups 1-4 were acid-etched and treated separately with either an ethanol-based adhesive (Single Bond) or an acetone-based adhesive (Prime&Bond NT) on either dry or wet enamel. Teeth in Group 5 were treated with a self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond). Epoxy replicas of different stages were taken after cavity preparation, after restoration, after 24 h storage, and after thermocycling test. These replicas were examined under a scanning electron microscope for their restorative marginal quality and enamel microcrack. Quantitative measurement was performed to measure the length ratio of different margin patterns, and enamel microcracks. RESULTS: There was no difference in the marginal quality when ethanol-base adhesive was applied on dry or wet dentin. The group using acetone-based adhesive on the dry enamel presented higher intact margin ratio than the group on wet enamel did only after restoration. Using self-etching primer led to higher open margin ratio at all stages. Enamel microcracks were found in all five groups and were higher in groups using acetone-based adhesives. CONCLUSION: Enamel wetness did not show a significantly adverse effect on the marginal quality of the restorations using either acetone- or ethanol-based adhesive. Using self-etching adhesive may lead to high incidence of margin deterioration.     

Micro-tensile bond strengths of bonding agents to pulpal floor dentine

AIM: The purpose of this study was to characterize the dentine surface of the pulpal floor and to determine the micro-tensile bond strengths of two dentine adhesive systems used in conjunction with a resin composite core material to pulpal floor dentine. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-six extracted human molars were cut horizontally with a slow-speed diamond saw to expose the pulp chamber and the pulp tissue was removed. Eight teeth were used to investigate characteristics of untreated and etched dentine surfaces of the pulpal floor using SEM. Twenty-eight teeth were randomly allocated to two groups, each of 14 teeth. In group 1, a 'one-bottle' system (Prime & Bond NT) was used as dentine bonding agent and in group 2, a self-etching-priming system (Clearfil SE Bond) was applied. Pulp chambers of both groups were then filled with resin composite core buildup (FluoroCore) and kept moist in tap water at 37 degrees C for 24 h. Samples were prepared for micro-tensile bond testing by sectioning each tooth vertically in the mid-pulpal floor region and shaped to an hour-glass form of 1 +/- 0.2 mm(2) area at the bonded interface. Micro-tensile bond strengths were determined using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm min-1. Fractured surfaces were examined by SEM. RESULTS: The intact pulpal floor showed numerous calcospherites with variable tubule density and few accessory canals. Etching the pulpal floor with 34% phosphoric acid gel resulted in an irregular surface with patent dentinal tubules and the dome-shaped calcospherites mostly lost. With self-etching primer, the superficial dentine surface was less demineralized and little peritubular dentine matrix was removed. Mean bond strength for the self-etching-priming (Clearfil SE Bond) specimens was significantly greater than for 'one-bottle' (Prime & Bond NT) specimens (P< 0.05, Student's t-test). The fracture mode of Clearfil SE Bond specimens was mostly partial cohesive failure within dentine, whilst Prime & Bond NT specimens mostly showed partial cohesive failure in bonding resin/composite. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an irregular surface morphology and absence of a smear layer, bonding to pulpal floor dentine was weaker than previously reported for cut coronal dentine. The self-etching-priming system bonded more strongly than the 'one-bottle' system.     

一步法自酸蚀粘接剂微拉伸粘接强度的研究

目的评价一步法白酸蚀粘接剂的牙本质微拉伸粘接强度，观察并分析样本断裂类型。方法选择新拔除的人无龋下颌第三磨牙12颗，分别用3种一步法、1种两步法的白酸蚀粘接剂进行牙本质粘接。用微拉伸测力仪测试粘接强度，并用体视显微镜和扫描电镜观察样本断裂类型。结果3种一步法白酸蚀粘接剂的微拉伸强度分别为：材料A（Adper Prompt）（23．36±2．55）MPa；材料B（Clearfil S^3 Bond）（30．46±3．82）MPa；材料C（Xenon Ⅲ）（34．59±3．46）MPa；1种两步法自酸蚀粘接剂材料D（Clearfil SE Bond）的微拉伸粘接强度为（45．06±5．29）MPa。材料D微拉伸粘接强度最高，与其他3组相比，差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。样本断裂均发生于粘接界面，未观察到复合树脂或牙本质内聚破坏。结论一步法白酸蚀粘接剂的牙本质粘接强度低于两步法白酸蚀粘接剂，但多数仍可满足临床对树脂粘接强度的要求。     

Influence of enamel wetness on composite restorations using various dentine bonding agents: part II-effects on shear bond strength

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the bond strength and fracture characteristics of various dentine bonding agents (DBAs) on wet or dry enamel. METHODS: Forty molar halves with enamel flattened were divided into 5 groups. Groups 1-4, teeth were acid-etched and treated separately with either an ethanol-based adhesive (Single Bond) or an acetone-based adhesive (Prime & Bond NT) on dry or wet enamel. Group 5 was treated with a self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond). The treated enamel surfaces were bonded with Z 250 composite with metal rings. The composite-ring assemblies were subjected to shear bond test until failure. Failure patterns on the debonded surfaces were inspected under a scanning electron microscope. The bonded enamel thickness was measured on sectioned specimens to investigate their statistical evidence. Results of open margin and enamel microcrack ratios from Part I of this study were compared with these fracture characteristics. Data was analyzed statistically. RESULTS: There was no difference in the bond strength between paired groups using the same DBA on wet or dry enamel. The teeth restored with self-etching adhesive exhibited lower bond strength and higher adhesive-enamel failure rate than the other groups. No correlation between enamel thickness, microcrack, bond strength, and failure patterns was revealed. CONCLUSION: The self-etching adhesive had a lower enamel bond strength than the other bonding systems. The difference in the failure patterns of groups with ethanol- and acetone-based DBAs on wet or dry enamel was indistinct. The frequently observed enamel microcrack cannot be directly correlated with the bond strength of bonding systems.