Airway inflammation, airway responsiveness and cough before and after inhaled budesonide in patients with eosinophilic bronchitis.

Eosinophilic bronchitis is a common cause of chronic cough, characterized by sputum eosinophilia similar to that seen in asthma, but unlike asthma the patients have no objective evidence of variable airflow obstruction or airway hyperresponsiveness. The reason for the different functional associations is unclear. The authors have tested the hypothesis that in eosinophilic bronchitis the inflammation is mainly localized in the upper airway. In an open study the authors measured the lower (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20)) and upper (PC25 MIF50) airway responsiveness to histamine, lower and upper airway inflammation using induced sputum and nasal lavage, in II patients with eosinophilic bronchitis. The authors assessed changes in these measures and in cough reflex sensitivity to capsaicin and cough severity after 400 microg of inhaled budesonide for 4 weeks. A nasal eosinophilia was present in only three patients with one having upper airway hyperresponsiveness. Following treatment with inhaled corticosteroids the geometric mean sputum eosinophil count decreased from 12.8% to 2.9% (mean difference 4.4-fold, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.14-10.02), the mean +/- sem cough visual analogue score on a 100 mm scale decreased from 27.2 +/- 6.6 mm to 12.6 +/- 5.7 mm (mean difference 14.6, 95% CI 9.1-20.1) and the cough sensitivity assessed as the capsaicin concentration required to cause two coughs (C2) and five coughs (C5) improved (C2 mean difference 0.75 doubling concentrations, 95% CI 0.36-1.1; C5 mean difference 1.3 doubling concentration, 95% CI 0.6-2.1). There was a significant positive correlation between the fold change in sputum eosinophil count and doubling dose change in C5 after inhaled budesonide (r=0.61). It is concluded that upper airway inflammation is not prominent in eosinophilic bronchitis and that inhaled budesonide improves the sputum eosinophilia, cough severity and sensitivity suggesting a causal link between the inflammation and cough.     

Leukotriene modifier vs inhaled corticosteroid in mild-to-moderate asthma: clinical and anti-inflammatory effects

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Evidence for the anti-inflammatory activity of leukotriene receptor antagonists in humans is somewhat limited. There are also no data comparing the anti-inflammatory effects of leukotriene receptor antagonists with those of inhaled corticosteroids. This study was designed to assess the clinical efficacy and anti-inflammatory effects of leukotriene receptor antagonist plus low-dose inhaled corticosteroids compared to those of a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with newly diagnosed asthma were recruited. They were randomly assigned to groups that received, for a 6-week period, either (1) budesonide, 600 microg bid (1,200 microg/d) or (2) budesonide, 200 microg (400 microg/d), and zafirlukast, 20 mg bid. The variables of asthma control were recorded daily. Sputum induction and methacholine provocation tests were performed. RESULTS: The results indicated that the administration of a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus zafirlukast was as effective as that of a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid regarding clinical improvement and anti-inflammatory effects (ie, eosinophil percentage, and eosinophilic cationic protein [ECP] and cysteinyl leukotriene C4 levels in induced sputum). Nineteen (group 1, 8 patients; group 2, 11 patients) of 49 patients (38.8%) had returned to normal airway responsiveness after treatment. Among these patients, 16 patients (84.2%) had normal ECP levels and 10 patients (52.6%) had normal percentages of eosinophils. ECP level, but not the eosinophil percentage, was significantly associated with symptom scores. The peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) showed a significant correlation with the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) instead of with symptom scores. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a leukotriene modifier to treatment with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids is equivalent to treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids in patients with newly diagnosed mild-to-moderate asthma. In addition to symptoms and PEFR, the monitoring of ECP and PC20 may be of great value in achieving optimal control of asthma.     

A dose-dependent effect of the novel inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide on airway responsiveness to adenosine-5'-monophosphate in asthmatic patients.

Inhaled corticosteroids decrease airway responsiveness in asthma partly through suppression of airway inflammation. We have previously demonstrated that inhaled budesonide reduced airway responsiveness to the mast cell stimulus adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) to a threefold greater extent than to methacholine and sodium metabisulfite, suggesting that AMP responsiveness may be a more sensitive marker of airway inflammation and steroid action in order to assess a dose-response relationship. To investigate this, we studied the effects of three doses of the novel corticosteroid ciclesonide (50 micrograms, 200 micrograms, and 800 micrograms) inhaled as a dry powder twice daily on airway responsiveness to AMP and inflammatory parameters in induced sputum. In a three-parallel-dose group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study, with a washout period of 3 to 8 wk, a total of 29 patients with mild to moderate allergic asthma underwent AMP challenge and sputum induction before and after 14 d of treatment with ciclesonide or matched placebo. Compared with placebo, ciclesonide 100 micrograms, 400 micrograms, and 1,600 micrograms daily reduced airway responsiveness to AMP by 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1 to 3.4, not significant [NS]), 2.0 (95% CI, 0.4 to 3.6, p < 0.05), and 3.4 (95% CI, 2.3 to 4. 4, p < 0.05) doubling doses, respectively, and this reduction in airway responsiveness was dose-dependent (p = 0.039). A significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum was observed after 400 micrograms and 1,600 micrograms daily ciclesonide (p < 0. 05), but this was not dose-dependent. Sputum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) was significantly reduced after 400 micrograms daily ciclesonide only (p < 0.05). Thus, in patients with mild to moderate asthma, assessment of airway responsiveness to AMP, rather than inflammatory parameters in induced sputum, represents a sensitive method to evaluate a dose-response relationship of an inhaled corticosteroid and may have applications in evaluating other novel inhaled corticosteroids.     

Montelukast reduces airway eosinophilic inflammation in asthma: a randomized, controlled trial.

Leukotrienes are pro-inflammatory mediators which may contribute to tissue, sputum, and blood eosinophilia seen in allergic and inflammatory diseases, including asthma. Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene1 (CysLT1) receptor antagonist which improves asthma control; the aim of this study was to investigate its effect on induced sputum eosinophils. Montelukast 10 mg (n=19) or placebo (n=21) were administered orally once in the evening for 4 weeks to 40 chronic adult asthmatic patients, aged 19-64 yrs, in a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study. Patients were included if, at prestudy, they had >5% sputum eosinophils, symptomatic asthma with a forced expiratory volume in one second > or =65% of the predicted value and were being treated only with "as needed" inhaled beta2-agonists. In addition to sputum eosinophils, blood eosinophils and clinical endpoints were also assessed. Four weeks of montelukast treatment decreased sputum eosinophils from 7.5% to 3.9% (3.6% decrease, 95% confidence interval (CI) -16.6-0.4). In contrast, placebo treatment was associated with an increase in sputum eosinophils from 14.5% to 17.9% (3.4% increase, 95% CI -3.5-9.8). The least squares mean difference between groups (-11.3%, 95% CI -21.1-(-1.4)) was significant (p=0.026). Compared with placebo, montelukast significantly reduced blood eosinophils (p=0.009), asthma symptoms (p=0.001) and beta2-agonist use (p<0.001) while significantly increasing morning peak expiratory flow (p=0.001). Montelukast was generally well tolerated in this study, with a safety profile similar to the placebo. These results demonstrate that montelukast decreases airway eosinophilic inflammation in addition to improving clinical parameters. Its efficacy in the treatment of chronic asthma may be due, in part, to the effect on airway inflammation.     

Anti-inflammatory effects of combined budesonide/formoterol in COPD exacerbations

Systemic corticosteroids and additional short-acting beta2-agonists are commonly used in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this double-blind study, the combination of a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid with a rapid-onset long-acting beta2-agonist was evaluated in the treatment of out-patient COPD exacerbations. The primary aim was to compare 14-day treatment effects of budesonide/formoterol to placebo on sputum eosinophils and, secondarily, on other indices of inflammation, forced expiratory flow in one second (FEV(1)), symptoms, health status, and adverse events. Forty-five patients not using steroids (37 male, 21/24 current/ex smoker, median packyears 38, age 65 years, FEV(1) 61% predicted), experiencing a COPD exacerbation, were treated at home with budesonide/formoterol (320/9 microg 4 times daily), prednisolone (30 mg daily), or placebo for 14 days. Sputum eosinophils were significantly reduced by budesonide/formoterol (-57%) compared to placebo (+24%) (p = 0.01). Budesonide/formoterol reduced total symptom scores significantly (p = 0.01) compared to placebo. The increase in FEV(1) by 2 weeks of treatment with budesonide/formoterol (125 ml) was not significantly different from that of placebo (43 ml) (p = 0.07). Budesonide/ formoterol treatment did not suppress morning serum cortisol compared to placebo (-16%; p = 0.50). In conclusion, budesonide/formoterol reduces sputum eosinophils and improves symptoms in the treatment of out-patient COPD exacerbations.     

Dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids under concomitant medication with montelukast in patients with asthma.

The present study aimed at comparing the effects of a dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids on lung function, indirect measures of airway inflammation and clinical scores during treatment with a leucotriene receptor antagonist. In 50 patients (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 94% predicted), steroid doses (800 microg beclomethasone dipropionate) were first reduced to 50% and then to 25%, for 6 weeks each. One group received a placebo and the other group received montelukast (10 mg). The first reduction did not cause significant effects. During the second, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow decreased in both groups (p<0.001). Daytime symptoms were not altered with placebo but were reduced by montelukast (p<0.05). Night-time symptoms were slightly elevated with placebo (p<0.05) but not montelukast, as well as the use of supplemental salbutamol. Changes in provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), sputum eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide were mostly nonsignificant for both placebo and montelukast. These data demonstrate that a 75% reduction in the dose of steroid given to patients with asthma led to a deterioration in lung function not prevented by montelukast, whereas changes in clinical state seemed to favour montelukast treatment. It therefore appears that potential effects of montelukast, in the presence of low-dose steroids, could not be attributed to single indices of lung function or airway inflammation.     

Effects of adding a leukotriene antagonist or a long-acting beta(2)-agonist in asthmatic patients with the glycine-16 beta(2)-adrenoceptor genotype

PURPOSE: In the United Kingdom, about 40% of patients with asthma are homozygous for the glycine-16 beta(2)-adrenoceptor polymorphism, which predisposes them to agonist-induced down-regulation and desensitization of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor. We assessed the effects of adding treatment with either a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (inhaled formoterol, 12 microg twice daily) or a leukotriene receptor antagonist (oral zafirlukast, 20 mg twice daily) to inhaled corticosteroid therapy in patients with this genotype.SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 24 patients with mild to moderate asthma who were being treated with inhaled corticosteroids. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments (placebo, zafirlukast, or formoterol in addition to inhaled corticosteroids) for 1 week each in a crossover fashion, separated by a 1-week placebo run-in and washout period. Measurements of bronchoprotection (measured as the provocative dose of methacholine that produced a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)]), exhaled nitric oxide (a surrogate marker of airway inflammation), and symptoms were made before each treatment and 12 hours after the last dose of each treatment.RESULTS: Both formoterol and zafirlukast were equally effective in maintaining asthma control compared with placebo: the geometric mean-fold difference in the methacholine provocative dose was 1.5-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1- to 2.2-fold) for zafirlukast and 1.9-fold (95% CI: 1.2- to 2.9-fold) for formoterol. As compared with placebo, zafirlukast caused a significant suppression in exhaled nitric oxide (1.7-fold difference in geometric mean values, 95% CI: 1.1- to 2.6-fold) but formoterol did not (1.2-fold difference, 95% CI: 0.8- to 1.9-fold). Diary cards showed significant (P <0.05) improvements in the peak flow with formoterol (morning and evening) and zafirlukast (evening) as compared with placebo.CONCLUSIONS: Formoterol and zafirlukast maintained asthma control in patients who might be genetically predisposed to fare worse with long-acting beta(2)-agonists. The reduction in exhaled nitric oxide with zafirlukast suggests that it may have anti-inflammatory effects in addition to those seen with inhaled corticosteroids.     

A bolus of inhaled budesonide rapidly reverses airway subsensitivity and beta2-adrenoceptor down-regulation after regular inhaled formoterol

BACKGROUND: Subsensitivity of airway beta2-adrenoceptors develops readily in asthmatics receiving regular long-acting beta2-agonists. This subsensitivity may be rapidly reversed by using systemic corticosteroids. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the same acute facilitatory effects occur when using a bolus dose of inhaled corticosteroid. METHODS: Ten subjects with stable mild-to-moderate asthma, with a mean age of 27 years, mean (+/- SD) FEV1 of 2.95 L (0.94 L), 81% (15%) of predicted, all receiving inhaled corticosteroids, reactive to adenosine monophosphate (AMP) with a provocative concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) < 200 mg/mL, were recruited into a randomized double-blind crossover study. The subjects received two separate 1-week treatment periods with formoterol dry powder, 24 microg bid, with an initial 1-week run-in and a 1-week washout period between the treatments. A single dose of placebo or budesonide turbuhaler, 1,600 microg, was taken in conjunction with the last dose of both treatment periods. AMP challenge was performed 2 h after the first and last dose of formoterol. Blood for lymphocyte beta2-adrenoceptor density (Bmax) was also measured before and after treatment with formoterol. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the geometric mean PC20 after the first dose of formoterol comparing the two treatment periods: 362 mg/mL vs 391 mg/mL. The PC20 after the last dose of formoterol was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in conjunction with budesonide than with placebo: 427 mg/mL vs 99 mg/mL, amounting to a 4.3-fold difference (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 16.6). For comparison within each treatment period, there was significant subsensitivity (p < 0.05) between the first and last dose of formoterol when the latter was given with placebo: 391 mg/mL vs 99 mg/mL, a 3.9-fold fall (95% CI, 1.0 to 15.2), but not when the latter was given with budesonide: 362 mg/mL vs 427 mg/mL, a 1.2-fold rise (95% CI, 0.5 to 2.8). Lymphocyte 02-adrenoceptor density (geometric mean Bmax: fmol/10(6) cells) also showed significant down-regulation (p < 0.05) by formoterol given with placebo: preformoterol 2.53 vs postformoterol 1.91, but not by formoterol given with budesonide: preformoterol 2.43 vs postformoterol 2.67. The Bmax was significantly higher (p < 0.05) with formoterol + budesonide as compared to formoterol + placebo, amounting to a 1.40-fold difference (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.80). CONCLUSION: We have shown that a bolus dose of inhaled budesonide rapidly reverses subsensitivity to AMP bronchoprotection and associated beta2-adrenoceptor down-regulation in asthmatics taking regular formoterol. Further studies are indicated to assess whether high-dose inhaled corticosteroids should be administered as soon as possible along with beta2-agonists during an acute episode of bronchoconstriction.     

Acute anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled budesonide in asthma: a randomized controlled trial

Corticosteroids can have acute effects on airway function and methacholine airway responsiveness in asthma as early as 6 h after dosing, suggesting there may be an acute anti-inflammatory effect of inhaled corticosteroid in asthma. This study aimed to determine the effects of a single dose of inhaled budesonide on sputum eosinophils and mast cells in adults with asthma, and to examine whether the mechanism of clearance of eosinophils was by apoptosis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted. At the screening visit, adults with stable asthma (n = 41) ceased inhaled corticosteroid therapy for 4 d and those with significant sputum eosinophilia (> or = 7%) were randomized (n = 26) to a single dose of budesonide 2,400 microg or placebo via Turbuhaler, on two separate study days. Symptoms and lung function were followed for 6 h, then sputum was induced and airway responsiveness to hypertonic saline determined. Sputum eosinophils (mean, SE) were significantly lower 6 h after budesonide (25%, 4.5), compared with placebo (37%, 6.2, p < 0.05). There was a 2.2-fold (95% CI 1.45 to 3.33) improvement in airway responsiveness with budesonide. No significant difference was seen on mast cells, apoptotic eosinophils, symptoms, or lung function. In conclusion, a single dose of inhaled corticosteroids has beneficial effects on airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness as early as 6 h after dosing. This may be clinically useful as therapy during mild exacerbations of asthma.     

Failure of montelukast to reduce sputum eosinophilia in high-dose corticosteroid-dependent asthma.

Sputum eosinophilia is a sensitive predictor of benefit from corticosteroid treatment. Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene antagonist, which also reduces sputum and blood eosinophils. The present study examined the possibility that montelukast has an added eosinophil-lowering effect in subjects with asthma who are corticosteroid responsive but relatively corticosteroid resistant. A total of 14 clinically stable adults with asthma requiring minimum treatment with a high-dose inhaled steroid or prednisone, with baseline sputum eosinophilia (> or =5%), were randomised to receive 4 weeks of 10 mg montelukast or placebo daily in a double-blind crossover trial. The primary outcome was the effect of treatment on the percentage of sputum eosinophils. Secondary outcomes were changes in the blood eosinophil count, symptoms, forced expiratory volume in one second, peak expiratory flow and the need for salbutamol. The median (interquartile range, i.e. 75th-25th centile) for sputum eosinophils at baseline was 15.7% (22). The effect of adding montelukast was not significantly different from that of placebo, sputum eosinophils being 9.3% (18.9) after montelukast and 11.3% (22.8) after placebo. No difference was detected on secondary outcomes. No crossover interactions were observed. In conclusion, the addition of montelukast to existing high-dose corticosteroid therapy in subjects with asthma with elevated sputum eosinophils does not provide additional attenuation of airway eosinophilia.     

Effects of terbutaline and budesonide on sputum cells and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthma

Previous studies have shown that the regular administration of short acting beta-agonists can be associated with adverse effects on airway caliber and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and that this may occur through a proinflammatory mechanism. The aim was to explore possible adverse effects of high-dose beta-agonist therapy and to assess any adverse interaction with corticosteroids. We undertook a randomized, crossover study to investigate the effects of 6 wk of treatment with regular terbutaline (1 mg four times a day), regular budesonide (400 microg twice a day), combined treatment, and placebo in subjects with mild to moderate asthma. Major endpoints were PD(15) saline, PD(20) methacholine, and induced sputum differential cell counts. Thirty-four subjects were randomized and 28 completed the study. PD(15) saline decreased on terbutaline alone compared with placebo treatment and on combined treatment compared with budesonide alone (mean fold decrease of 0.57 [95% CI = 0.36, 0.90] and 0.65 [95% CI = 0.43, 0.97], respectively). PD(20) methacholine was not affected by the use of terbutaline either alone or in combination with budesonide. The percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum increased during terbutaline treatment alone compared with placebo (median 8.3% versus 4.4%, p = 0.049). The addition of terbutaline to budesonide did not affect the percentage of eosinophils compared with budesonide treatment alone. These findings support the hypothesis that short-acting beta-agonists have a permissive effect on airway inflammation and that when used in high dose there may be an unfavorable interaction with inhaled corticosteroids.     

Effects of budesonide/formoterol combination therapy versus budesonide alone on airway dimensions in asthma

Background and objective: Combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long‐acting β₂‐agonists results in improved asthma symptom control compared with the use of inhaled corticosteroids alone. However, the effects of combination therapy on structural changes and inflammation of the airways are still unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of budesonide/formoterol with those of budesonide alone on airway dimensions and inflammation in individuals with asthma. Methods: Fifty asthmatic patients were randomized to treatment with budesonide/formoterol (200/6 µg, two inhalations bd) or budesonide (200 µg, two inhalations bd) for 24 weeks. Airway dimensions were assessed using a validated computed tomography technique, and airway wall area (WA) corrected for body surface area (BSA), percentage WA (WA%), wall thickness/Ösquare root BSA, and luminal area (Ai)/BSA at the right apical segmental bronchus, were measured. The percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum, pulmonary function, and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaires (AQLQ) were also evaluated. Results: There were significantly greater decreases in WA/BSA (P < 0.05), WA% (P < 0.001) and wall thickness/square root BSA (P < 0.05), and increases in Ai/BSA (P < 0.05), in subjects treated with budesonide/formoterol compared with those treated with budesonide. The reduction in sputum eosinophils and increase in per cent of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁%) were greater for subjects treated with budesonide/formoterol compared with those treated with budesonide alone. In the budesonide/formoterol group, the changes in WA% were significantly correlated with changes in sputum eosinophils and FEV_1% (r = 0.84 and r = 0.64, respectively). There were improvements in the AQLQ scores after treatment with budesonide/formoterol. Conclusions: Budesonide/formoterol combination therapy is more effective than budesonide alone for reducing airway wall thickness and inflammation in individuals with asthma.     

Efficacy and safety of formoterol Turbuhaler when added to inhaled corticosteroid treatment in children with asthma

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted in 302 children aged 6-11 years with asthma not optimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone. Patients continued with their existing dose of inhaled corticosteroids and in addition received placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg or formoterol 9 microg b.i.d., for 12 weeks (all delivered via Turbuhaler). Terbutaline was available as reliever medication. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF); secondary efficacy variables included forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), serial PEF measured over 12 hr, evening PEF, asthma symptom score, and quality of life. Compared with placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg and 9 microg improved morning PEF by 8 l/min (P = 0.035) and 11 l/min (P = 0.0045), respectively. Evening PEF and FEV(1) were also significantly increased compared with placebo, with no statistically significant difference between formoterol doses. Lung-function improvements compared with placebo were greater in the middle of the day. Twelve-hour average serial PEF after 3 months increased by 24 l/min (95% CI, 9, 39 l/min) in the formoterol 9-microg group, and by 14 l/min (95% CI, 0, 29 l/min) in the formoterol 4.5-microg group. The incidence of severe exacerbations in both formoterol groups was numerically lower than in the placebo group, indicating that formoterol may have the potential to improve exacerbation control in children. Both formoterol doses were well-tolerated, and tolerance to the drug's bronchodilator effect was not observed. Formoterol provided sustained improvements in lung function and was well-tolerated in children with asthma suboptimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone.     

Effects of montelukast and budesonide on airway responses and airway inflammation in asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids are effective antiinflammatory therapy for asthma; however, they do not completely abolish allergen-induced airway inflammation. Leukotriene modifiers attenuate both early and late allergen responses and have antiinflammatory properties. We reasoned that treatment with budesonide and montelukast in combination might provide greater antiinflammatory effects than either drug alone, and the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of treatment with budesonide and montelukast, alone or in combination, on outcome variables after allergen inhalation. Ten subjects with asthma with dual responses after allergen inhalation were included in this randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Outcomes included early and late asthmatic responses, and changes in airway responsiveness and sputum eosinophilia, measured before and after challenge. Treatment with montelukast attenuated the maximal early asthmatic response compared with placebo (p < 0.001) and budesonide (p = 0.002). Both budesonide and montelukast, alone and in combination, attenuated the maximal late asthmatic response compared with placebo (p < 0.01). Budesonide and montelukast, alone and in combination, afforded protection against allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (p < 0.05), although the treatment effect of budesonide was greater than that of montelukast (p < 0.05). Treatment with budesonide and montelukast, alone and in combination, also attenuated allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia. Thus, montelukast and budesonide attenuated allergen-induced asthmatic responses, airway hyperresponsiveness, and sputum eosinophilia, although combination treatment did not provide greater antiinflammatory effects than either drug alone.     

Eosinophilic bronchitis is an important cause of chronic cough.

Eosinophilic bronchitis presents with chronic cough and sputum eosinophilia, but without the abnormalities of airway function seen in asthma. It is important to know how commonly eosinophilic bronchitis causes cough, since in contrast to cough in patients without sputum eosinophilia, the cough responds to inhaled corticosteroids. We investigated patients referred over a 2-yr period with chronic cough, using a well-established protocol with the addition of induced sputum in selected cases. Eosinophilic bronchitis was diagnosed if patients had no symptoms suggesting variable airflow obstruction, and had normal spirometric values, normal peak expiratory flow variability, no airway hyperresponsiveness (provocative concentration of methacholine producing a 20% decrease in FEV(1) ([PC(20)] > 8 mg/ml), and sputum eosinophilia (> 3%). Ninety-one patients with chronic cough were identified among 856 referrals. The primary diagnosis was eosinophilic bronchitis in 12 patients, rhinitis in 20, asthma in 16, post-viral-infection status in 12, and gastroesophageal reflux in seven. In a further 18 patients a diagnosis was established. The cause of chronic cough remained unexplained in six patients. In all 12 patients with eosinophilic bronchitis, the cough improved after treatment with inhaled budesonide 400 micrograms twice daily, and in eight of these patients who had a follow-up sputum analysis, the eosinophil count decreased significantly, from 16.8% to 1.6%. We conclude that eosinophilic bronchitis is a common cause of chronic cough, and that sputum induction is important in the investigation of cough.     

Double-blind, randomised, controlled trial assessing controller medications in asthma

BACKGROUND: The motive behind conducting this study was to determine if better control of asthma can be achieved by adding a second controller medication and to assess its use to reduce the dose of inhaled steroids. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to determine whether either oral sustained-release theophylline or montelukast added to inhaled steroids improved clinical symptoms and pulmonary function test parameters when compared to high-dose steroids alone. METHODS: Ninety patients with incompletely controlled asthma were allocated, in a randomised, double-blind fashion, to one of three treatment groups: group A: double dose of inhaled budesonide (400 microg b.i.d.), group B: 400 mg oral sustained-release theophylline plus budesonide (200 microg b.i.d.) and group C: 10 mg montelukast plus budesonide (200 microg b.i.d.). The primary endpoints were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). RESULTS: All three groups had improved FEV(1) and PEFR at 8 weeks (p < 0.001). Group C increased their PEFR by 18.7 l/min (95% confidence interval, CI, 12.4-25.1) more than group A and by 19.8 l/min (95% CI 13.4-26.1) more than group B (both p = 0.001). Similarly, group C had a 114 ml (95% CI 45-183 ml) greater improvement in FEV(1) than group A and a 95 ml (95% CI 26-164 ml) greater improvement than group B (both p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of montelukast to budesonide is safe and results in greater improvement in pulmonary function test parameters than high-dose budesonide treatment or addition of theophylline.     

Dose-response evaluation of the therapeutic index for inhaled budesonide in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma

PURPOSE: Inhaled corticosteroids have beneficial effects on pulmonary function and inflammation in patients with asthma, but they also cause systemic adverse effects, such as adrenal suppression. We evaluated the therapeutic index of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients by comparing their dose-response effects on lung function, surrogate markers of airway inflammation, and tests of adrenal function. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: After a 10-day placebo run-in, we evaluated the effects of 200 microg, 400 microg, and 800 microg of inhaled budesonide, each dose given twice daily sequentially for 3 weeks in 26 patients, aged 35 +/- 12 years (mean +/- SD), with mild-to-moderate asthma. Measurements were made of bronchial reactivity, exhaled nitric oxide (a marker of airway inflammation), spirometry, serum eosinophilic cationic protein concentration, and 10-hour overnight urinary cortisol excretion. Plasma cortisol levels were measured at 8 AM and after stimulation with human corticotropin releasing factor. RESULTS: For measurements of pulmonary function and exhaled nitric oxide, there was a plateau in the mean response to budesonide between 400 microg (low dose) and 800 microg (medium dose) per day, whereas for eosinophilic cationic protein and bronchial challenge, maximal benefits occurred between 800 and 1,600 microg (high dose) per day. Effects on plasma cortisol levels showed maximal suppression at 1,600 microg of budesonide per day. The proportion of patients with an optimal therapeutic index, in terms of a good airway response (fourfold decrease in bronchial hyperreactivity) and minimal systemic response (overnight urinary cortisol greater than 20 nmol), was similar at low-dose (46%) and at high-dose (52%) budesonide. The proportion of patients with a suboptimal therapeutic index, a good airway response with a marked systemic response (overnight urinary cortisol greater than 20 nmol), increased from 4% at low dose to 38% at high dose. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma, there were dose-related effects of budesonide on surrogate markers of inflammation (bronchial hyperreactivity and serum eosinophilic cationic protein), although higher doses were associated with adrenal suppression and a decrease in the therapeutic index.     

福莫特罗、孟鲁司特和溴醋茶碱治疗支气管哮喘的疗效比较

目的 比较福莫特罗、孟鲁司特和溴醋茶碱联合应用布地奈德治疗支气管哮喘(简称哮喘)的疗效.方法 利用观察、前瞻、对比研究方法,选取2014年5月至2015年2月于延安市人民医院诊断为哮喘患者78例,随机分成3组,分别接受福莫特罗(6 μg/喷)+布地奈德(100 μg/喷)联合吸入剂(2次/d,每次2喷)、口服孟鲁司特(10 mg,1次/d)+布地奈德(100μg/喷,2次/d,每次2喷)和口服溴醋茶碱(100mg,2次/d)+布地奈德(100 μg/喷,2次/d,每次2喷).患者在治疗后随访4周,记录治疗前后的肺量测定值包括FEV1和最大呼气流速(PEFR).利用哮喘生命质量问卷(AQLQ)方法评估患者治疗前后的生命质量情况.结果 与基线期相比,在接受4周药物治疗后3组患者的FEV1、PEFR和生命质量均表现出显著改善.3组每两组间比较结果显示,区域A、C和D无明显差异.但在区域B,福莫特罗组患者与其他2组相比能够更有效地控制哮喘症状(治疗4周后AQLQ评分为0.45±0.02 vs 0.61±0.03,0.83±0.15;t=2.18,2.25;P＜0.05).溴醋茶碱组中3例患者有胃刺激反应,而其他组患者无明显不良反应.结论 福莫特罗、孟鲁司特和溴醋茶碱联合应用布地奈德在治疗哮喘方面疗效类似.     

Low- and high-dose fluticasone propionate in asthma; effects during and after treatment.

The dose dependency of the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on markers of asthmatic airway inflammation have not been well studied. There is a need to study the dose/response effects on this inflammation. In order to determine the dose/response effects of fluticasone propionate (FP), 24 asthmatic subjects were randomized to low- (100 microg x day(-1)) or high-dose (1,000 microg x day(-1)) FP for six weeks followed by placebo for 3 weeks. During treatment, the median increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)was 12% in the high-dose group (p<0.05) and 10% in the low-dose group (p<0.05) (p>0.05 between groups); the median decrease in the percentage of sputum eosinophils was 93% in the high-dose group (p<0.05) and 46% in the low-dose group (p<0.05) (p>0.05 between groups). Symptoms, salbutamol use, morning peak flow, provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), sputum eosinophil cationic protein concentration and tryptase activity improved significantly in both groups (p<0.05), but only the improvement in salbutamol use was greater in the high-dose group (p<0.05). During the run-out, the improvements in FEV1 and PC20 were rapidly reversed in both groups, but the improvements in peak flow and tryptase activity persisted; the improvement in sputum eosinophil concentration persisted only in the high-dose group (p<0.05). It was concluded that dose/response effects for FP are not easily demonstrable because low-dose FP is quite effective. For most outcomes, the effects of high- and low-dose FP are relatively short-lived after treatment is stopped. This finding raises questions about the extent to which inhaled corticosteroids are disease-modifying in asthma.