Evaluation of Body Mass Index and Survival of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Propensity-Matched Analysis: An Observational Case-Control Study

The effect of pretreatment body mass index on survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma remains contradictory.All patients (N = 1778) underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Body mass index was categorized as underweight (<18.5 kg/m²), normal weight (18.5–22.9 kg/m²), overweight (22.9–27.5 kg/m²), and obesity (≥27.5 kg/m²). Propensity score matching method was used to identify patients with balanced characteristics and treatment regimen. Disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse–free survival were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression.Following propensity matching, 115 (underweight vs normal), 399 (overweight vs normal), and 93 (obese vs normal) pairs of patients were selected, respectively. In univariate analysis, underweight patients had inferior DSS/OS (P = 0.042) and DMFS (P = 0.025) while both overweight and obese patients showed similar survival across all the endpoints (P ≥ 0.098) to those with normal weight. In multivariate analysis, underweight remained predictive of poor DSS/OS (P = 0.044) and DMFS (P = 0.040), whereas overweight (P ≥ 0.124) or obesity (P ≥ 0.179) was not associated with any type of survival.Underweight increased the risk of death and distant metastasis, whereas overweight or obese did not affect the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This provides support for early nutritional intervention during the long waiting time before treatment.     

Body mass index,cardiac surgery and clinical outcome. A single-center experience with 9125 patients

Background and AimThere is evidence for a J-shaped association between Body Mass Index (BMI) and all-cause mortality in general populations. In cardiac surgical patients, the effect of BMI on mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) is not completely clear.Methods and ResultsWe investigated the effect of BMI on MACCE (primary endpoint), as well as intensive care unit (ICU)-related outcomes and mid-term mortality in 9125 consecutive patients who were operated on at our institution between July 2009 and July 2012. Of the study cohort, 3.0% were underweight (BMI < 20 kg/m²), 28.0% had a normal BMI (20–24.99 kg/m²), 43.1% were overweight (BMI 25–29.99 kg/m²), 19.3% were obese (BMI 30–34.99 kg/m²), and 6.6% were severely obese (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²). Compared with overweight patients (lowest incidence of MACCE), the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio of MACCE in severely obese patients was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.03–1.87). Underweight and severely obese patients had the longest risk-adjusted duration of mechanical ventilator support and ICU stay (P-values 0.004–0.001). The red blood cell concentrates requirement was highest in underweight patients (P < 0.001). Compared with normal and overweight patients, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio of 2-year mortality was higher in underweight patients (1.72 [95% CI: 1.26–2.36] and =2.07 [95% CI: 1.51–2.83], respectively), but did not differ significantly in severely obese patients.ConclusionData demonstrate that both severe obesity and underweight are independent risk factors for operative complications in cardiac surgical patients. With respect to mid-term survival, special attention should be paid to underweight patients scheduled for cardiac surgery.     

Body mass index and mortality in patients with severe coronary artery diseases: A cohort study from China

Background and aimsIt is still controversial whether obesity and overweight increase the risk of mortality for patients with coronary artery disease. The current study aimed to investigate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and mortality in patients with triple-vessel disease (TVD).Methods and resultsFrom April 2004 to February 2011, 8943 patients with angiographically confirmed TVD were consecutively enrolled. Patients were divided into five groups according to BMI: underweight (<18.5 kg/m²), normal weight (18.5–23.9 kg/m²), overweight: (24–27.9 kg/m²), mild obesity (28–31.9 kg/m²), and severe obesity (≥32 kg/m²). The primary end point was all-cause death. Subgroup analysis was performed for treatment strategies: revascularization and medical treatment alone. During a median follow-up of 7.5 years, lower risks of mortality were observed in patients with overweight (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.97) and mild obesity (adjusted HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–1.00) compared to those with normal weight. Polynomial Cox regression suggested a U-shape association between BMI and adjusted mortality risk. In the revascularization subgroup, there was a significantly higher mortality risk in patients with severe obesity (adjusted HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03–2.40) than in those with normal weight. While in the medical treatment subgroup, mortality risk decreased as BMI increased, with the lowest risk being observed in patients with severe obesity.ConclusionThere is a U-shape relationship between BMI and all-cause death in patients with TVD, with increased risks among both underweight and severely obese patients. This relationship may be influenced by treatment strategies.     

Does body mass index impact the number of LNs harvested and influence long-term survival rate in patients with stage III colon cancer?

Background

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether different body mass index (BMI) values affect lymph node (LN) retrieval and whether such variations influence long?Cterm survival in Asian patients.

Method

From January 1995 to July 2003, 645 stage III colon cancer patients were enrolled in our study. Patients were stratified into four groups: Obese (BMI ?R 27 kg/m²), overweight (24 ?? BMI < 27 kg/m²), normal (18.5 ?? BMI < 24 kg/m²), and underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m²).

Results

Mean BMI in the cohort was 23.3?kg/m². Mean number of LNs harvested was 23.1, 19.5, 19.8 and 28.1 in the normal, overweight, obese and underweight groups, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean number of LNs harvested when comparing the overweight and underweight groups to the normal group (p?=?0.013 and p?=?0.04, respectively). Females were overrepresented in the underweight group (p?=?0.011), and patients who had proximal colon cancers were more frequently underweight (p?=?0.018). The mean number of LNs harvested varied by cases of right hemicolectomy (p?=?0.009) and proximal cancer location (p?=?0.009) for different BMI groups. Multivariate analysis showed that underweight, proximal colon cancer, well- or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma and stage IIIC cancer were significant variables for adequate LN recovery. BMI was not significantly associated with relapse-free survival (p?=?0.523) or overall survival (p?=?0.127).

Conclusion

BMI is associated with LN harvest but is not an independent variable in stage III colon cancer survival.     

Impact of body mass index on survival of esophageal squamous carcinoma patients in southern China

Background

Although high body mass index (BMI) increases risk for developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), the prognostic influence of BMI is unknown in esophageal squamous carcinoma.

Methods

BMI was calculated using measured height and weight at the first diagnosis and categorized as overweight (25 to 29.9 kg/m²), normal (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m²) or underweight (<18.5 kg/m²). Survival was compared by using the log-rank test on the Kaplan-Meier life table. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate whether BMI was an independent prognostic factor for disease-specific survival (DSS).

Results

Among 1,176 esophageal squamous carcinoma patients, 146 (12.4%) were categorized as overweight, and 277 (23.6%) underweight. More patients in the underweight group had anemia (P=0.001), weight loss (P=0.035) and R1 resection (P<0.001). Less patients in the underweight group received adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.01). Patients in the overweight group had a higher incidence rate of high blood pressure (P<0.001), diabetes (P<0.001) and coronary artery diseases (P<0.001). Moreover, more patients in the overweight group had a lower TNM stage (P=0.003). In the univariated analysis, high BMI was significantly associated with better DSS (P=0.013).

Conclusions

After adjusting for covariates enrolled for study, high BMI was an independent prognostic factor in weight loss esophageal squamous carcinoma patients.     

Influence of Body Mass Index on the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in the United States, 2008–2017

BackgroundThere are limited data on influence of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS).MethodsAdult AMI-CS admissions from 2008 to 2017 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample and stratified by BMI into underweight (<19.9 kg/m²), normal-BMI (19.9–24.9 kg/m²) and overweight/obese (>24.9 kg/m²). Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, invasive cardiac procedures use, hospitalization costs, and discharge disposition.ResultsOf 339,364 AMI-CS admissions, underweight and overweight/obese constitute 2356 (0.7%) and 46,675 (13.8%), respectively. In 2017, compared to 2008, there was an increase in underweight (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.40 [95% confidence interval {CI} 4.91–8.31]; p < 0.001) and overweight/obese admissions (aOR 2.93 [95% CI 2.78–3.10]; p < 0.001). Underweight admissions were on average older, female, with non-ST-segment-elevation AMI-CS, and higher comorbidity. Compared to normal and overweight/obese admissions, underweight admissions had lower rates of coronary angiography (57% vs 72% vs 78%), percutaneous coronary intervention (40% vs 54% vs 54%), and mechanical circulatory support (28% vs 46% vs 49%) (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was lower in underweight (32.9% vs 34.1%, aOR 0.64 [95% CI 0.57–0.71], p < 0.001) and overweight/obese (27.6% vs 38.4%, aOR 0.89 [95% CI 0.87–0.92], p < 0.001) admissions. Higher hospitalization costs were seen in overweight/obese admissions while underweight admissions were discharged more often to skilled nursing facilities.ConclusionUnderweight patients received less frequent cardiac procedures and were discharged more often to skilled nursing facilities. Underweight and overweight/obese AMI-CS admissions had lower in-hospital mortality compared to normal BMI.     

Overweight and obesity as protective factors against mortality in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

BackgroundPrevious studies have reported inconsistent results on the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients. Additionally, research on ICD patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is lacking.HypothesisThis study aimed to investigate the impact of BMI on mortality and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in NICM patients with an ICD.MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed the data from the Study of Home Monitoring System Safety and Efficacy in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device‐implanted patients (SUMMIT) in China. Four hundred and eighty NICM patients with an ICD having BMI data were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: underweight and normal range group (BMI < 24 kg/m²), overweight and obese group (BMI≥24 kg/m²). The primary endpoint was all‐cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was the first occurrence of VAs requiring appropriate ICD therapy or shock.ResultsDuring a median follow‐up of 61 (1‐95) months, 70 patients (14.6%) died, 173 patients (36%) experienced VAs requiring appropriate ICD therapy, and 112 patients (23.3%) were treated with ICD shock. Multivariate Cox regression modeling indicated a decreased mortality risk in the overweight and obese group compared with the underweight and normal range group (hazard ratio = 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.26‐0.77, P = .003). However, the risk of VAs was similar in both groups in univariate and multivariate Cox models.ConclusionsCompared with underweight and normal weight, overweight and obesity are protective against mortality but have only a neutral impact on VAs risk in NICM patients with an ICD.     

Association Between Body Mass and Mortality in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

A total of 959 Taiwanese patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis—102 underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m²), 492 normal weight (BMI 18.5–22.9 kg/m²), 187 overweight (BMI 23.0–24.9 kg/m²), and 178 obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) were recruited into this three-year, multicenter longitudinal study. It was found initially that the underweight group had more females, longer hemodialysis durations, less use of a biocompatible membrane (BCM) dialyzer, higher erythropoietin doses and Kt/V_urea, and lower white blood cell counts, hemoglobin, serum creatinine and phosphate, and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) than other groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, a χ²-test demonstrated that underweight patients had poorer nutrition (P = 0.023), but less systemic inflammation (P < 0.001) than other groups. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis established that age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hemodialysis duration, use of BCM dialyzer, Kt/V_urea, creatinine, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and hsCRP were significant risk factors associated with BMI (P < 0.001–0.002). After three years, 149 (15.5%) patients had died, including 22 of 102 (21.6%) underweight patients, 64 of 492 (13.0%) normal weight patients, 38 of 187 (20.3%) overweight patients, and 25 of 178 (15.5%) obese patients. The primary causes of mortality were cardiovascular (52.3%) and infection (39.6%). A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, diabetes mellitus, BMI, albumin, hsCRP, and cardiothoracic ratio were significant risk factors associated with all-cause mortality over three years (P < 0.001–0.022). Finally, Kaplan–Meier analysis confirmed that underweight patients suffer higher mortality than other groups (Log rank, P = 0.0392); therefore, the data have demonstrated a survival disadvantage of low BMI in Taiwanese patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.     

Associations between body mass index and mortality in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients

Introduction and objectivesThe association between the level of body mass index (BMI) and the mortality of patients with critical liver disease remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between BMI and hospital mortality of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).MethodsClinical data from 146 ACLF patients were collected and analyzed. BMI was categorized into three groups: lower BMI (<18.5 kg/m²), normal BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m²), and overweight (25.0–32.0 kg/m²). BMI and laboratory parameters were measured one day before, or on the day of the start of the treatment. Values of BMI and laboratory parameters were compared between survivors and non-survivors, and then hospital mortality rates were compared among patients with different BMI levels.ResultsThe prognosis of ACLF patients was significantly correlated with international normalized ratio (INR), albumin and BMI. The ACLF patients with low albumin level and high INR values tend to have a high mortality rate. Also, survival time was significantly shorter in the ACLF patients with lower BMI, while patients with normal and overweight values had longer survival time.ConclusionsA graded association between BMI and hospital mortality with a strong significant trend was found in ACLF patients in China.     

The association between body mass index and in-hospital outcome among patients with acute myocardial infarction—Insights from China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) registry

BackgroundThe relationship between body mass index (BMI) and in-hospital mortality risk among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial.Methods and ResultsWe included 35,964 patients diagnosed with AMI in China Acute Myocardial Infarction registry between January 2013 and December 2016. Patients were categorized into 4 groups according to BMI level: BMI <18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25–30, and ≥30 kg/m² for underweight, normal, overweight, and obese groups, respectively. Clinical data were extracted for each patient, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between BMI level and in-hospital mortality. Compared with normal-weight patients, obese patients were younger, more often current smokers, and more likely to have hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. Multivariable regression analysis results demonstrated that compared with normal group, underweight group had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–1.69; p = 0.016), while overweight group (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77–0.97; p = 0.011) and obese group (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46–0.91; p = 0.013) had lower mortality. All subgroups showed a trend toward lower in-hospital mortality risk as BMI increased.ConclusionsOur study provided robust evidence supporting “obesity paradox” in a contemporary large-scale cohort of patients with AMI and demonstrated that increased BMI was independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality.     

Does “Obesity Paradox” Apply for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement?

BackgroundData is controversial regarding the existence of an “obesity paradox” in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). We sought to investigate the prognostic value of the body mass index (BMI) on outcomes following TAVR.MethodsThis is an observational, single-center study involving all patients who underwent TAVR from 2009 to 2019. BMI was calculated in all patients before TAVR. The cohort was subdivided into four groups: underweight (<20 kg/m²), normal weight (≥20 to <25 kg/m²), overweight (≥25 to <30 kg/m²) and obese (≥30 kg/m²). The main endpoint was all-cause 30-day and one-year mortality.ResultsA total of 412 patients (mean age 79.6 ± 7.8 years, mean STS score 5.3 ± 3.6) were included. Patients were grouped as follows: underweight (n = 35, 8.5%), normal weight (n = 121, 29.4%), overweight (n = 140, 34%) and obese (n = 116, 28.1%). Obese patients were younger, included more females and had lower STS score than the rest of the cohort whereas underweight patients were older, had higher STS score, more chronic kidney disease, more left ventricular dysfunction and more often underwent non-transfemoral TAVR. BMI predicted 30-day survival (AUC:0.692 [95%CI 0.522–0.862]; p = 0.030) with an optimal cut-off of 24.4 (sensitivity = 66.6%, specificity = 63.6%). On multivariate analysis, higher BMI trended toward lower 30-day mortality (HR = 0.87 [95%CI 0.75–1.01]; p = 0.071).Thirty-day mortality was higher in the underweight group (8.3%) in comparison with other BMI subgroups (normal weight 2.5%, overweight 1.4%, obese 0.9%; p = 0.045). However, no significant difference was found after adjustment of confounders (all p = NS). BMI did not predict one-year mortality. No significant difference in one-year survival was observed between the four BMI subgroups (log rank p = 0.925).ConclusionBMI could represent an interesting prognostic tool for short-term mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. BMI < 20 kg/m² was associated with higher 30-day mortality. Symptoms improved similarly in obese patients compared to lower BMI patients. For 30-day survivors, no evidence of the existence of an obesity paradox was observed in this cohort.     

Risk of hospitalization associated with body mass index and weight changes among prevalent haemodialysis patients

The impact of body mass index (BMI) and body weight on hospitalization rates in haemodialysis patients is unknown.This study hypothesizes that being either underweight or obese is associated with a higher hospitalization rate.Observational study of 6296 European haemodialysis patients with prospective data collection and follow-up every six months for three years (COSMOS study). The risk of being hospitalized was estimated by a time-dependent Cox regression model and the annual risk (incidence rate ratios, IRR) by Poisson regression. We considered weight loss, weight gain and stable weight. Weight change analyses were also performed after patient stratification according to their baseline BMI.A total of 3096 patients were hospitalized at least once with 9731 hospitalizations in total. The hospitalization incidence (fully adjusted IRR 1.28, 95% CI [1.18–1.39]) was higher among underweight patients (BMI <20 kg/m²) than patients of normal weight (BMI 20–25 kg/m²), while the incidence of overweight (0.88 [0.83–0.93]) and obese patients (≥30 kg/m², 0.85 [0.79–0.92]) was lower. Weight gain was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization. Conversely, weight loss was associated with a higher hospitalization rate, particularly in underweight patients (IRR 2.85 [2.33–3.47]).Underweight haemodialysis patients were at increased risk of hospitalization, while overweight and obese patients were less likely to be hospitalized. Short-term weight loss in underweight individuals was associated with a strikingly high hospitalization rate.     

Sex difference of mortality by age and body mass index in gastric cancer

Mortality difference by age, sex, body mass index (BMI) in gastric cancer (GC) has been controversial. We evaluated sex-specific mortality by age and BMI. A total of 5961 patients diagnosed with GC from 2005 to 2013 in a single tertiary center were included and were followed until December 2017. The plot in goodness-of-fit-test by sex was crossed, so we performed sex-specific analysis. Overall mortality was lower in women than in men (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.72). Favor outcomes in women compared to men were observed among patients older than 60 yr (aHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.56–0.74), a BMI less than 25 kg/m² (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.61–0.79), and stage I (aHR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.38–0.56). In sex-specific analysis, mortality increased in age older than 60 yr in men, whereas it increased in both extreme ages (<40 yr and ≥ 70 yr) in women. Mortality by BMI was lowest at BMI of 25–29.9 kg/m² and gradually increased according to decrease of BMI in men; aHR, 1.24 (23–24.9 kg/m²), 1.44 (18.5–22.9 kg/m²), and 2.54 (BMI<18.5 kg/m²). However, mortality decreased in patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² (aHR, 0.46) in women. The sex discrepancies in GC mortality by age and BMI suggest the need for sex-specific approaches to prognostic prediction.     

The impact of underweight and obesity on outcomes in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis on the obesity paradox

Although obesity is associated with the development and progression of atrial fibrillation (AF), an obesity paradox may be present, illustrated by seemingly protective effects of obesity on AF‐related outcomes. Body mass index (BMI) has an impact on outcomes in AF patients using oral anticoagulants. After searching Medline and Embase, meta‐analysis of results of four randomized and five observational studies demonstrated significantly lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.80, 95%CI [0.73–0.87]; RR 0.63, 95%CI [0.57–0.70]; and RR 0.42, 95%CI [0.31–0.57], respectively) and all‐cause mortality (RR 0.73, 95%CI [0.64–0.83]; RR 0.61, 95%CI [0.52–0.71]; and RR 0.56, 95%CI [0.47–0.66], respectively) in overweight, obese and morbidly obese anticoagulated AF patients (BMI 25 to <30, ≥30 and ≥40 kg/m², respectively) compared to normal BMI anticoagulated AF patients (BMI 18.5 to <25 kg/m²). In contrast, thromboembolic (RR 1.92, 95%CI [1.28–2.90]) and mortality (RR 3.57, 95%CI [2.50–5.11]) risks were significantly increased in underweight anticoagulated AF patients (BMI <18.5 kg/m²). In overweight and obese anticoagulated AF patients, the risks of major bleeding (RR 0.86, 95%CI [0.76–0.99]; and RR 0.88, 95%CI [0.79–0.98], respectively) and intracranial bleeding (RR 0.75, 95%CI [0.58–0.97]; and RR 0.57, 95%CI [0.40–0.80], respectively) were also significantly lower compared to normal BMI patients, while similar risks were observed in underweight and morbidly obese patients. This meta‐analysis demonstrated lower thromboembolic and mortality risks with increasing BMI. However, as this paradox was driven by results from randomized studies, while observational studies rendered more conflicting results, these seemingly protective effects should still be interpreted with caution.     

Impact of body mass index for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy

AIM: To evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on short and long term results after pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD).METHODS: A consecutive series of PDs performed at the Karolinska University Hospital from 2004 till 2010 were retrieved from our prospective database. The patients were divided by BMI into overweight/obese (O; BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) and controls (C; BMI < 25 kg/m²). Demographics, peri-operative data, morbidity, mortality, pancreatic fistula (PF) rate, length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, histology, and survival were analyzed. An additional sub analysis of survival was performed in patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and divided in underweight, normal-weight, overweight and obese.RESULTS: A total of 367 PDs were included (O = 141/C = 226). No differences were found between O and C regarding demographics, peri-operative data, costs, morbidity or mortality. O was associated with higher intra-operative blood loss (1392 ± 115 mL vs 1121 ± 83 mL; P = 0.01), rate of PF (20% vs 9.5%; P = 0.006) and marginally longer LOS (18 ± 0.9 d vs 15 ± 1.1 d; P = 0.05). An increasing risk for PF was observed with increasing BMI. The 1, 3 and 5 years survival rate was similar in O and C in PDAC (68.7%, 26.4% and 8.8% vs 66.1%, 30.9% and 17.9% respectively; P = 0.9). When the survival was analyzed using 4 different categories of BMI (underweight, normal, overweight and obese), a trend was seen toward a difference in survival, with a worse prognosis for the underweight and obese patients compared to normal weight and overweight patients.CONCLUSION: Overweight increases the risk for intra-operative bleeding and PF, but do not otherwise alter short or long term outcome after PD for pancreatic cancer.     

Impact of obesity as a mortality predictor in high-risk patients with myocardial infarction or chronic heart failure: a pooled analysis of five registries

AIMS: To explore the influence of obesity on prognosis in high-risk patients with myocardial infarction (MI) or heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Individual data of 21 570 consecutively hospitalized patients from five Danish registries were pooled together. After a follow-up of 10.4 years, all-cause mortality using multivariate model and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Compared with normal weight [body mass index (BMI) 18.5-24.9 kg/m2], obesity class II (BMI >or= 35 kg/m2) was associated with increased risk of death in patients with MI but not HF [HR = 1.23 (1.06-1.44), P = 0.006 and HR = 1.13 (0.95-1.36), P = 0.95] (P-value for interaction = 0.004). Obesity class I (BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2) was not associated with increased risk of death in MI or HF [HR = 0.99 (0.92-1.08) and 1.00 (0.90-1.11), P > 0.1]. Pre-obesity (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) was associated with decreased death risk in MI but not HF [HR = 0.91 (0.87-0.96), P = 0.0006 and 1.04 (0.97-1.12), P = 0.34] (P-value for interaction = 0.007). Underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) patients were in increased death risk regardless of MI or HF [HR = 1.54 (1.35-1.75) and 1.37 (1.18-1.59), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: In patients with MI but not HF, the relationship between BMI and mortality is U-shaped with highest mortality in underweight and obese class II, but lowest in the other BMI classes.     

Obesity and autologous stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia

In the bone marrow transplant setting, several authors hypothesized that severely overweight patients are at increased risk of transplant-related toxicity, but different definitions of obesity, different body weight groupings and heterogeneous samples of patients were analyzed. To overcome these limitations, we retrospectively considered a homogeneous group of 54 patients (median age 36.5 years), with a diagnosis of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), autografted in first complete remission (CR) with the Bu-Cy2 conditioning regimen, dosed on actual body weight. Patients were classified into three groups (obese, non-obese, underweight) using body mass index (BMI = kg/m(2)); for each group we analyzed transplant-related toxicity and mortality, overall survival and disease-free survival (OS/DFS). In spite of the relatively small number of patients, in our results high BMI appears a predictive factor for an increase of treatment-related toxicity and mortality. Moreover, 30 (55%) patients are currently alive in continuous CR, and after a median follow-up of 76.5 months (range 14-137) statistically significant differences in OS and DFS were detected between obese and non-obese groups (P = 0.012 and 0.021, respectively). Our study suggests that obesity may represent an independent risk factor for autograft in AML and further investigations are warranted.     

Underweight status at diagnosis is associated with poorer outcomes in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective study of JALSG AML 201

Recent studies have described various impacts of obesity and being overweight on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) outcomes in adult patients, but little is known about the impact of being underweight. We compared the outcomes of underweight patients to those of normal weight and overweight patients. Adult patients with AML who registered in the JALSG AML201 study (n = 1057) were classified into three groups: underweight (body mass index [BMI] < 18.5, n = 92), normal weight (BMI 18.5–25, n = 746), and overweight (BMI ≥ 25, n = 219). With the exception of age and male/female ratio, patient characteristics were comparable among the three groups. Rates of complete remission following induction chemotherapy were similar among the three groups (p = 0.68). We observed a significant difference in overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) between underweight and normal weight patients (3-year OS 34.8 vs. 47.7%, p = 0.01; DFS 28.6 vs. 39.8%, p = 0.02; 1-year NRM 6.2 vs. 2.6%, p = 0.05), but not between underweight and overweight patients. In multivariate analysis, underweight was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS (p < 0.01), DFS (p = 0.01), and NRM (p = 0.04). During the first induction chemotherapy, the incidences of documented infection (DI) and severe adverse events (AEs) were higher in underweight patients than those in normal weight patients (DI 16 vs. 8.1%, p = 0.04; AE 36 vs. 24%, p = 0.05). In conclusion, underweight was an independent adverse prognostic factor for survival in adult AML patients.     

The influence of underweight and dietary support on well-being in lung transplant candidates

BACKGROUND: Quality of life has been found to be a significant predictor of survival in lung transplantation candidates. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between underweight, dietary support and well-being. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire for perceived well-being was administered to underweight (n=42) and normal-weight (n=29) candidates for lung transplantation before and after dietary intervention in which the underweight patients received dietary support for weight gain. RESULTS: Underweight compared with normal-weight, independent of lung function, was associated with low well-being in several of the measured dimensions. Improvements were observed after dietary intervention compared with baseline in the underweight patients, for scores in the dimension of tiredness 29.2 (4.2) vs. 26.2 (6.0), P<0.01; general satisfaction 4.7 (1.5) vs. 4.0 (1.4), P=0.01; social life 16.7 (3.9) vs. 15.0 (4.4), P=0.02) (mean (sd) before and after dietary intervention respectively), but not in the normal-weight patients. The underweight patients achieved the goal for energy intake and protein intake and experienced a significant weight gain. Regression analyses showed that none of the well-being improvements was associated with weight gain or change in body composition. However, an association between less tiredness and an increase in protein intake was indicated (b=-0.305, P=0.055). CONCLUSION: Underweight compared with normal-weight was associated with more impaired quality of life in candidates for lung transplantation and some benefit from dietary support in terms of well-being was indicated.     

Overweight is associated with better one-year survival in elderly patients after cardiac surgery: a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-III database

BackgroundThe relationship of body mass index (BMI) to short- and long-term outcomes after cardiac surgery remains controversial, and the dose-response relationship between BMI and mortality in patients receiving cardiac surgery is unclear. Furthermore, the influence of age, concomitant disease, and types of surgery on the prognostic role of BMI has yet to be determined.MethodsA retrospective cohort study with 6,473 adult patients receiving cardiac surgery was conducted using the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to assess the association of BMI with 1-year and in-hospital mortality. Restricted cubic regression splines were used to evaluate the effect of BMI as a continuous variable and to determine appropriate cut points. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age, hypertension and types of surgery.ResultsThe baseline characteristics of patients differed between BMI categories. On multivariable analysis, overweight patients (BMI 25–30 kg/m²) had a lower 1-year mortality [hazard ratio (HR) =0.660, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.516–0.843, P=0.001] when compared with normal weight patients (BMI 18.5–25 kg/m²). For patients with BMI <30 kg/m², each 1 kg/m² BMI increase was independently associated with a significant decrease in the 1-year mortality risk (HR =0.936, 95% CI: 0.899–0.975, P=0.002), while in patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m², an increase in BMI did not increase the 1-year mortality risk (HR =1.032, 95% CI: 0.998–1.067, P=0.064). Subgroup analyses suggested the protective effect of overweight on post-cardiac surgery survival was confined to patients with advanced age (>60 years), hypertension and those undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).ConclusionsOverweight was associated with better 1-year survival in patients after cardiac surgery when compared to normal weight. The protective effect of overweight on post-cardiac surgery survival was confined to elderly patients (>60 years).