Motor events underlying gastro-oesophageal reflux in ambulant patients with reflux oesophagitis

Abstract Information on the mechanism of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease is limited largely to studies in resting recumbent subjects. Evidence exists that both posture and physical activity may influence reflux. The aim of this study was to investigate reflux mechanisms in ambulant patients with reflux oesophagitis. Concurrent ambulatory oesophageal manometry and pH monitoring were performed in 11 ambulant patients with erosive oesophagitis. Lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure was monitored with a perfused sleeve sensor. Recordings were made for 90 min before and 180 min after a meal. At set times patients sat in a chair or walked. LOS pressure was ≤2 mmHg at the time of reflux for 98% of reflux episodes. Transient LOS relaxation was the most common pattern overall and the predominant pattern in seven patients, whilst persistently absent basal LOS pressure was the most common pattern in four patients. The pattern of LOS pressure was not altered by the presence of hiatus hernia or by walking. Straining occurred at the onset of 31% of acid reflux episodes but often followed the development of an oesophageal common cavity. The occurrence of straining was not influenced by walking. In ambulant patients with reflux oesophagitis: (1) LOS pressure is almost always absent at the time of reflux, usually because of transient LOS relaxation, (2) persistently absent basal LOS pressure is an important mechanism of reflux in a few patients, (3) straining may help to induce acid reflux in a variable proportion of occasions and may in some instances be a response to gas reflux, and (4) walking does not influence the occurrence of reflux or its mechanisms.     

Mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the lateral decubitus positions

Gastro-oesophageal reflux is more common in the right than in the left lateral position but the reasons why are not well understood. We have therefore studied the mechanisms underlying reflux in the lateral decubitus positions in patients with reflux disease. Fifteen patients with symptomatic reflux and excessive oesophageal acid exposure were studied (nine male, age 25-63 years). Each was intubated with a perfused manometric assembly, incorporating a Dent sleeve, and a pH probe. Following a 30-min basal period, a 400-kCal meal was infused into the stomach and patients were studied for 60 min in each lateral position. Following infusion of the meal, lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure fell and transient LOS relaxation (TLOSR) frequency increased. Acid reflux episodes were more common in the postprandial period (fasting 0 (0-6) h, first postprandial hour 1 (0-9) h, P = 0.0002, second postprandial hour 1 (0-22) h, P = 0.02) and occurred more than twice as often in the right lateral position (right 3 (0-22) h, left 0 (0-10) h, P = 0.01). However, TLOSRs, swallow-related relaxations and low basal LOS pressures were equally common in both lateral positions. In patients with reflux disease, postprandial reflux is twice as common in the right lateral position. This does not relate to differences in gastro-oesophageal junctional pressure, suggesting that other aspects of barrier function or differences in the intragastric distribution of chyme may be important.     

Computer analysis of prolonged lower oesophageal sphincter pressure recordings

The aim of the study was to validate a recently developed computer program for the analysis of prolonged recordings of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure. Thirty 1-hour stretches were selected from sets of 24-h pressure signals recorded from the pharynx, oesophagus, lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) and stomach in 10 ambulant patients with gastrooesophageal reflux disease. Three experienced investigators visually analysed end-expiratory LOS pressures and transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs), using published criteria. A computer program was developed for calculation of an end-expiratory pressure curve and detection of TLOSRs using the same criteria. Although the results showed an maximum deviation from the mean of 11.1% and 14.8% for manually calculated LOS pressures and visually detected TLOSRs, respectively only 62.1% of the detected TLOSRs were detected by all three observers. LOS pressure as measured by the computer closely approximated the mean of the LOS pressures calculated by the three observers. Although the total number of TLOSRs was comparable to that assessed by visual analysis, the computer detected only 46% of the TLOSRs detected by each observer and 56.8% of the TLOSRs detected by all observers. It is concluded that automated calculation of end-expiratory LOS pressure is feasible and yields reliable results, whereas automated detection of TLOSRs could not be satisfactorily accomplished. Our study showed that improvement of computer algorithms for TLOSR detection is desirable. However, the previously described criteria for detection of TLOSRs are insufficiently precise; further refinement of these criteria will be necessary to reduce the large discrepancies between the outcome of detection of TLOSRs by computer and by humans, and to reduce the equally large discrepancies between the results of detection by different human observers.     

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations play an insignificant role in gastro-oesophageal reflux to the proximal oesophagus.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux to the proximal oesophagus may cause atypical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). The motor abnormalities underlying reflux into the proximal oesophagus are still unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse the oesophageal motility during reflux into the proximal oesophagus in a group of healthy subjects and in patients with atypical symptoms of GORD. We concentrated particularly on lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) activity and transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs). Ten patients (7M, 3F, age 25-51 years) with mild oesophagitis (Savary-Miller grade I-II) and 10 healthy subjects (6M, 4F, age 23-54 years) underwent a 24-h dual pH-metric and manometric recording, using an electronic portable device. This recorded distal and proximal oesophageal pH values, oesophageal body and LOS motility. GORD patients had more distal and proximal reflux (DR and PR) compared with healthy controls (DR P < 0.001; PR P < 0.05). TLOSRs were the most frequent event during reflux into the distal oesophagus, whereas TLOSR frequency was much lower during reflux to the proximal oesophagus in GORD patients and in healthy controls (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 vs. distal reflux, respectively). A significant relationship between TLOSRs and distal refluxes was present but no relationship with proximal reflux was detected. We conclude that TLOSRs are much less frequent during reflux to the proximal oesophagus than distal oesophageal reflux in patients with mild GORD suffering from atypical manifestations. The mechanism of acid reflux to the proximal oesophagus is unclear.     

Gastro-oesophageal reflux of liquids and gas during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations

Some transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs) are accompanied by gastro-oesophageal reflux and others are not. We aimed to investigate what factors determine the occurrence and type of reflux during TLOSRs. In 12 healthy subjects prolonged high-resolution manometry was performed. Reflux was detected using pH-impedance monitoring. A total of 219 TLOSRs were detected; no differences were observed between the duration of TLOSRs with liquid-containing reflux (20.2 +/- 1.0 s), gas reflux (17.0 +/- 1.0 s) and no reflux (19.0 +/- 1.0 s). Trans-sphincteric pressure gradient was similar in TLOSRs with liquid reflux (1.6 +/- 0.1 kPa), gas reflux (1.5 +/- 0.1 kPa) and no reflux (1.7 +/- 0.3 kPa). Prevalence, duration and amplitude of oesophageal pre-contractions and sphincteric after-contractions were not different for TLOSRs with and without reflux. The total number of TLOSRs decreased significantly from 8.2 +/- 0.8 in the first to 5.7 +/- 0.5 in the second and 4.4 +/- 0.6 in the third 70-min recording period. The number of TLOSRs accompanied by liquid-containing reflux decreased from 4.7 +/- 0.9 to 3.0 +/- 0.4 to 1.6 +/- 0.4, while the numbers of TLOSRs with gas reflux remained unchanged (2.1 +/- 0.6-2.1 +/- 0.7-2.2 +/- 0.6). Besides, time after the meal, no differences were observed in the characteristics of TLOSRs with and without gastro-oesophageal reflux. We conclude that factors, other than TLOSR characteristics, are important of whether or not a TLOSR is reflux-related.     

Reproducibility of meal-induced transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

AIM: To calculate the number of subjects required in trials investigating drugs reducing the number of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs), the inter- and intra-individual variability of TLOSRs were determined, using meal ingestion as a trigger of TLOSRs and reflux. METHODS: A total of 23 gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) patients with no to grade B oesophagitis and a hiatal hernia < or =3 cm underwent oesophageal manometry and pHmetry 1 h before and 3 h after ingestion of a solid meal on two separate days approximately 4 weeks apart. Reflux episodes and the underlying mechanisms and the number of TLOSRs were evaluated. RESULTS: The number of TLOSRs, reflux episodes and % time with pH < 4 after meal ingestion did not differ significantly between the two sessions. The intra-individual variation of TLOSRs in the 3 h postprandial period (24.4) was smaller compared with the inter-individual variation (47.5). Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations were the predominant cause of reflux accounting for 61 +/- 7 and 70 +/- 5% of the reflux episodes in visits 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data for the first time provide information on the variability of TLOSRs and reflux evoked by meal ingestion, which is of crucial importance for the design and power calculations of future clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of new drugs targeting TLOSRs.     

Comparison of two techniques for lower oesophageal sphincter manometry: sleeve and sphinctometer

We have compared the sphinctometer with the water-perfused sleeve (gold standard) for measurement of lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) characteristics by simultaneous recording. LOS pressure and transient LOS relaxations (TLOSR) measured by sleeve and sphinctometer in 11 healthy volunteers showed identical patterns. However, output of the sphinctometer was significantly (P < 0.01) lower than output of the sleeve. A total of 249 TLOSR were recorded. Of these, 176 TLOSR were identified by both sleeve and sphinctometer, 50 TLOSR were identified by sleeve alone and 23 TLOSR by sphinctometer alone. Due to the lower pressure output of the sphinctometer, 29 LOS relaxations did not reach criteria to qualify as TLOSRs. When TLOSR criteria were adjusted for sphinctometer pressure measurements, the number of TLOSRs identified by both sleeve and sphinctometer increased from 176 to 205. In conclusion, in healthy volunteers the sphinctometer registers TLOSR with results comparable with sleeve recording. However at low LOS pressures, the number of TLOSR is underscored by the sphinctometer.     

Distinct patterns of oesophageal shortening during primary peristalsis, secondary peristalsis and transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation

This study characterized oesophageal shortening during secondary peristalsis and transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR) in an attempt to determine its contribution to the opening mechanism. Eight healthy subjects (four males, 26 +/- 1 years) had metal clips affixed at 0, +3, and +8 cm relative to the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ), defining two distal oesophageal segments. Axial clip movement was assessed with concurrent videofluoroscopy and manometry during primary peristalsis, secondary peristalsis and TLOSR. Clip-defined oesophageal segment length change was measured at 0.5-s intervals. The magnitude of the most distal segment shortening was least with TLOSR, greatest with primary peristalsis and intermediate with secondary peristalsis. Conversely, maximal overall oesophageal shortening during TLOSR, evidenced by SCJ movement, was similar to that during primary peristalsis. In 3/12 TLOSRs, the moment of LOS opening and gas reflux was optimally imaged; SCJ excursion was 0.3 +/- 0.1 cm prior to LOS opening and 1.4 +/- 0.7 cm immediately after gas reflux. The segmental pattern of oesophageal shortening was distinct during primary peristalsis, secondary peristalsis and TLOSR. During TLOSR, significant elevation of the SCJ occurred only after LOS opening, suggesting that this was a consequence of oesophageal distension induced by gas reflux rather than a component of the opening mechanism.     

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation in achalasia: everything but LOS relaxation

Abstract  In conducting clinical high-resolution oesophageal pressure topography (HROPT) studies we observed that after subjects sat upright between series of supine and upright test swallows, they frequently had a transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR). When achalasia patients were studied in the same protocol, they exhibited a similar HROPT event leading to the hypothesis that achalasics had incomplete TLOSRs. We reviewed clinical HROPT studies of 94 consecutive non-achalasics and 25 achalasics. Studies were analyzed for a TLOSR-like event during the study and, when observed, that TLOSR-like event was characterized for the degree and duration of distal oesophageal shortening, the degree of LOS relaxation, associated crural diaphragm (CD) inhibition, oesophageal pressurization and upper oesophageal sphincter (UOS) relaxation. About 64/94 (68%) non-achalasics and 15/24 (63%) of achalasics had a pressure topography event after the posture change characterized by a prolonged period of distal oesophageal shortening and/or LOS relaxation. Events among the non-achalasics and achalasics were similar in terms of magnitude and duration of shortening and all were associated with CD inhibition. Similar proportions had associated non-deglutitive UOS relaxations. The only consistent differences were the absence of associated LOS relaxation and the absence of HROPT evidence of reflux among the achalasics leading us to conclude that their events were incomplete TLOSRs. Achalasic patients exhibit a selective defect in the TLOSR response suggesting preservation of all sensory, central and efferent aspects of the requisite neural substrate with the notable exception of LOS relaxation, a function of inhibitory (nitrergic) myenteric plexus neurons.     

Influence of different intragastric stimuli on triggering of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation in the dog

Gastro-oesophageal reflux in the dog is mainly caused by transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR), the major stimulus for which is distension of the stomach. The possibility that liquid and/or acid sensors in the proximal stomach reduce the incidence and/or shorten the duration of TLOSR was addressed in the present study. Manometric recordings of the pharynx, oesophagus, lower oesophageal sphincter and stomach were made in awake dogs equipped with an oesophagostomy. TLOSRs were induced by insufflation of air or infusion of liquid nutrients with varying pH. Intragastric distension with air provoked TLOSRs with a significantly shorter duration than those seen after distension with liquid (4.3 +/- 0.5 vs 9.6 +/- 0.3 sec; P < 0.05). There were fewer TLOSRs at high intragastric pH (pH 5.0: 3.1 +/- 0.5/90 min) than at low pH (pH 1.5: 5.5 +/- 0.9/90 min, P < 0.05). Successfully propagated peristalsis following a TLOSR was more common after stimulation with liquid than with air. It can be concluded that there are H(+)-sensing mechanisms in the stomach which stimulate triggering of TLOSR. In addition, the reduced duration of TLOSR during air insufflation shows that the physical state of the distending stimulus can affect the patterning of TLOSR.     

Elicitation of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in response to gastric distension and meal ingestion

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of graded gastric barostat distension and meal-induced fundic relaxation on the elicitation of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR). In 15 healthy subjects, stepwise fundic distension and oesophageal manometry were performed simultaneously. Next, the effect of meal ingestion on proximal stomach volume and lower oesophageal sphincter function was studied. During stepwise barostat distension of the proximal stomach, a significant linear correlation between intragastric pressure (r = 0.91; P < 0.01) and the TLOSR rate during inflation and subsequent deflation (r = 0.96; P < 0.01) was found. A similar relationship was found for volume. In addition, after meal ingestion, the TLOSR rate increased significantly from 1.40 +/- 3 to 5.4 +/- 1.5 h-1 (P < 0.01) and 5.2 +/- 1.7 h-1 (P < 0.01), respectively, during the first and second 30-min postprandially. However, at similar calculated intragastric volumes, barostat distension led to a significantly higher TLOSR rate than the meal. Similarly, distension-induced increase in gastric wall tension, estimated from the measured bag pressure and volume using Laplace's law, was associated with significantly higher TLOSR rates (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the rate of TLOSRs in healthy volunteers is directly related to the degree of proximal gastric distension and pressure-controlled barostat distension is a more potent trigger of TLOSRs than a meal. The latter finding suggests that tension receptor activation is an important stimulus for TLOSRs.     

Effect of baclofen on oesophageal motility and transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in GORD patients: a 48-h manometric study

Abstract  Little is known about prolonged effect of baclofen on oesophageal and lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) motility. We aimed at investigating the oesophageal motility in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) patients 24 h before and after the administration of multiple doses of baclofen. Twenty-one GORD patients underwent a 48-h manometry recording the swallows, the oesophageal and the LOS motility. During the second 24-h period, patients received baclofen 10 mg or placebo four times per day in a double-blind randomized fashion. Baclofen increased the LOS basal tone in comparison with baseline ( P  = 0.02), with a concomitant reduction in the number of transient LOS relaxations (TLOSRs) ( P  = 0.01). Moreover, baclofen induced a decrease of the swallows ( P  = 0.02) and of primary oesophageal body waves ( P  = 0.04) with no changes in the amplitude. Multiple doses of baclofen determine a reduction in the number of TLOSRs and an increase in the LOS tone throughout the 24 h. The concomitant decreased number of swallows and of primary peristalsis could depend on the well-known lower amount of reflux episodes induced by the drug. The potential therapeutic effect of baclofen could be expressed not only postprandially, but also in the fasting state when reflux episodes are present as well.     

Monitoring the lower oesophageal sphincter: sphinctometer or sleeve?

Two methods have been used to study lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) function in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: the sleeve sensor and the sphinctometer. Our aim was to directly compare the sleeve and sphinctometer in vivo. Ten asymptomatic volunteers were intubated with a perfused assembly incorporating a sleeve sensor, a solid-state assembly incorporating a sphinctometer and a pH probe. LOS function was recorded pre- and post-prandially. During basal periods sleeve and sphinctometer readings correlated well both within and between subjects (r2 = 0.89 (P < 0.0001)). However, the sphinctometer relaxed less during swallows (median 42 (interquartile range 27-55)% vs 73 (62-81)% (P < 0.001)), transient LOS relaxations (TLOSR) (50 (40-70)% vs 94 (88-100)% (P < 0.001)) and reflux episodes (67 (59-75)% vs 97 (91-100)% (P = 0.02)). Using criteria derived from 10 dry swallows, the expected relaxation of the sphinctometer during TLOSR was defined. The sphinctometer had an overall sensitivity ranging from 43 to 71% for the detection of TLOSR with 11-22 false positive relaxations, depending on the criteria employed. Sensitivity was particularly poor in those with low basal LOS pressure. The sphinctometer has a lower capacity to register LOS relaxations than the sleeve sensor, which limits its value in studying the pathophysiology of reflux disease.     

The lower oesophageal sphincter

Abstract  The lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) is a specialized segment of the circular muscle layer of the distal oesophagus, accounting for approximately 90% of the basal pressure at the oesophago-gastric junction. Together with the crural diaphragm, it functions as an antireflux barrier protecting the oesophagus from the caustic gastric content. During swallowing or belching, the LOS muscle must relax briefly in order to allow passage of food or intragastric air. These swallow-induced and prolonged transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs) respectively result from activation of the inhibitory motor innervation of the sphincter. Both in man and animals, the main neurotransmitter released by the inhibitory neurones is nitric oxide. The two typical examples of dysfunction of the LOS are achalasia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Achalasia is characterized by reduction or even absence of the inhibitory innervation to the LOS, leading to impaired LOS relaxation with dysphagia and stasis of food in the oesophagus. On the contrary, GORD results from failure of the antireflux barrier, with increased exposure of the oesophagus to gastric acid. This leads to symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation, and in more severe cases to oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus and even carcinoma. To date, TLOSRs are recognized as the main underlying mechanism, and may represent an important target for treatment. More insight in the pathogenesis of both diseases will undoubtedly lead to new treatments in the near future.     

The effect of glucagon-induced gastric relaxation on TLOSR frequency

This study aimed to determine the effect of glucagon-induced gastric relaxation on the frequency of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs). Eight normal subjects (four male, age 18-52 y) were studied after a 6-h fast using a combined manometric barostat assembly. The recording was divided into two 1-h sessions: (1) a baseline period with the barostat set at minimal distending pressure (MDP) + 2 mmHg and (2) a period with continuous glucagon or placebo infusion with barostat set at MDP + 2 mmHg. Patients were studied on two different days and randomly received glucagon (4.8 microg kg(-1) bolus followed by 9.6 microg kg(-1) h(-1) infusion) on 1 day and placebo (saline) on another. Lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure, frequency of TLOSRs, and barostat bag volumes were determined for both placebo and glucagon infusion. Glucagon induced significant fundal relaxation compared with placebo (P < 0.05) and significantly decreased baseline LEOS pressure (P < 0.05). The frequency of TLOSRs was not altered by glucagon infusion compared with placebo. Despite causing substantial proximal stomach relaxation, glucagon did not increase TLOSR frequency. This suggests that the relevant gastric mechanoreceptors responsible for triggering TLOSRs do not respond to passive elongation.     

Increased swallowing frequency in GORD is likely to be caused by perception of reflux episodes

Abstract  Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) swallow air more frequently and have more gas-containing reflux episodes than healthy controls. One explanation for this phenomenon may be that GORD patients primarily swallow more frequently and, as a consequence, have more swallow- or transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation-associated reflux episodes. Another explanation may be that GORD patients swallow more often in response to perception of reflux episodes. The aim of this study was to differentiate between these two possible mechanisms. In 34 patients with typical reflux symptoms oesophageal 24-h pH-impedance monitoring was performed twice, once off and once on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The number of reflux episodes and number of swallows and air swallows was evaluated. The symptom association probability (SAP) was used to distinguish patients with a good relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes (SAP+) from those who had not (SAP−). In both the SAP+ ( n  = 21) as SAP− patients ( n  = 13), the acid exposure time decreased during PPI therapy. In the SAP+ patients, the number of swallows decreased on PPI (829 ± 85 off vs 701 ± 79 on PPI, P  < 0.05), whereas in the SAP− patients, the incidence of swallows (802 ± 93 off vs 814 ± 69 on PPI, P  = NS) was not influenced by the PPI therapy. PPI therapy reduces the number of swallows in patients with a positive SAP, but not in those with a negative SAP. This finding supports the hypothesis that the increased incidence of swallows in GORD is brought about by responses to perceived reflux events.     

Regional oesophageal sensitivity to acid and weakly acidic reflux in patients with non-erosive reflux disease

Abstract  The mechanisms underlying symptoms in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) remain to be elucidated. Non-erosive reflux disease patients appear to be more sensitive to intraluminal stimula than erosive patients, the proximal oesophagus being the most sensitive. In order to assess regional oesophageal changes in reflux acidity and sensitivity to reflux, according either to the acidity or the composition of the refluxate, combined multiple pH and multiple pH-impedance (pH-MII) was performed in 16 NERD patients. According to multiple pH-metry, 29% and 12% of reflux events reached the middle and proximal oesophagus respectively, and 35% and 19% according to conventional pH-MII ( P  < 0.05). The per-individual analysis confirmed the difference between the two techniques. According to combined distal and proximal pH-MII, approximately 30% of distal acid reflux became weakly acidic at the proximal oesophagus. In all patients, the frequency of symptomatic refluxes, both acid and weakly acidic, was significantly higher at the proximal, compared with distal oesophagus (25 ± 8% vs 11 ± 2% for acid reflux and 27 ± 8% vs 8 ± 2% for weakly acidic reflux; P  < 0.05). Compared with multiple pH-metry, pH-MII shows a higher sensitivity in the detection of proximal reflux. As approximately 30% of acid reflux becomes weakly acidic along the oesophageal body, to better characterize proximal reflux, in clinical practice, combined proximal pH-impedance monitoring should be used. In NERD patients, the proximal oesophagus seems to be more sensitive to both acid and weakly acidic reflux.     

Mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in the ferret

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) relaxation is the major mechanism of gastro-oesophageal reflux in humans – an event unassociated with swallowing. Mechanisms involved in triggering transient LOS relaxation are poorly understood, and their further study requires a small animal model. In this study we aimed to establish methods for prolonged ambulant oesophageal manometry in ferrets, and to determine motor events associated with reflux episodes and their triggering by different gastric nutrient loads. Forty-two studies were performed on nine ferrets with chronic cervical oesophagostomies, through which a manometric assembly was introduced and secured to a collar, which incorporated a microphone for detection of swallows. The assembly included a gastric feeding channel, one gastric and four oesophageal manometric sideholes, a 2.5-cm-long LOS sleeve sensor, and an oesophageal pH electrode. Intragastric infusions were given over 2 min, the first after a 30-min control recording period, and in 29/42 studies, a second infusion was given 60 min later. Infusions were either 25 mL 10% dextrose solution, pH 3.5 (22 studies), 25 mL triglyceride emulsion (Intralipid) pH 3.5 (11 studies), or 25 mL air (nine studies). Episodes of oesophageal acidification were absent before gastric infusions. After infusion, 2.1 ± 0.2 episodes occurred over the first 30 min. After glucose infusion, 15/18 acidification episodes (83%) occurred during transient LOS relaxation, and 3/18 (17%) occurred after gradual (< 1 mmHg sec⁻¹) downward drifts in basal LOSP to < 2 mmHg. After lipid infusion two acidification episodes occurred, both during transient LOS relaxation. Mean duration of transient LOS relaxation was 8.0 ± 0.4 sec. All infusions increased occurrence of transient LOS relaxation to a similar extent, each of which ended with primary peristalsis. We conclude that gastric infusion of glucose, lipid and gas are all effective in provoking gastro-oesophageal reflux in ferrets. Reflux occurs through similar mechanisms to those seen in humans, i.e. increased triggering of transient LOS relaxation. The conscious ferret is therefore an appropriate model for future studies of manipulation of mechanisms giving rise to gastro-oesophageal reflux.     

Correlation between gastric pH and gastro-oesophageal reflux contents: ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring results

Gastro-oesophageal reflux events should be related to gastric contents. The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between gastric pH and the nature of reflux events. Ambulatory oesophageal pH-impedance and gastric pH monitoring was performed in 41 patients [29 off and 12 on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy] and 12 controls. The mean gastric pH was measured within 2 min around the reflux episodes, 10 cm below the cardia. Acid reflux events occurred more frequently at gastric pH <4 (89%) than non-acid reflux events (63%, P < 0.0001). Acid reflux events extended more frequently 15 cm above the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS; 34%) than non-acid reflux episodes (24%, P = 0.005). Gastric pH was significantly lower during interprandial reflux events than during postprandial ones in the three groups (P < 0.001). A positive correlation was found between gastric pH and the nadir oesophageal pH during reflux events in the three groups: this correlation was more significant in patients on PPI therapy. We conclude that most acid and non-acid reflux episodes occur at acid gastric pH, as measured 10 cm below the LOS. This measure does not appear a good predictor of the pH of reflux events.     

Postprandial gastric antral contractions in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a scintigraphic study

Abstract  Disturbed gastric contractility has been found in manometric studies in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), but the pathophysiological role of this abnormality is unclear. We aimed at assessing postprandial gastric antral contractions and its relationships with gastric emptying and gastro-oesophageal reflux in GORD patients. Fasted GORD patients ( n  = 13) and healthy volunteers ( n  = 13) ingested a liquid meal labelled with 72 MBq of ^99mTechnetium-phytate. Gastric images were acquired every 10 min for 2 h, for measuring gastric emptying half time. Dynamic antral scintigraphy (one frame per second), performed for 4 min at 30-min intervals, allowed estimation of both mean dominant frequency and amplitude of antral contractions. In GORD patients ( n  = 10), acidic reflux episodes occurring 2 h after the ingestion of the same test meal were determined by ambulatory 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring. Gastric emptying was similar in GORD patients and controls (median; range: 82 min; 58–126 vs 80 min; 44–122 min; P  = 0.38). Frequency of antral contractions was also similar in both groups (3.1 cpm; 2.8–3.6 vs 3.2 cpm; 2.4–3.8 cpm; P  = 0.15). In GORD patients, amplitude of antral contractions was significantly higher than in controls (32.7%; 17–44% vs 23.3%; 16–43%; P  = 0.01), and correlated positively with gastric emptying time ( R _s = 0.58; P  = 0.03) and inversely with the number of reflux episodes ( R _s = −0.68; P  = 0.02). Increased amplitude of postprandial gastric antral contractions in GORD may comprise a compensatory mechanism against delayed gastric emptying and a defensive factor against acidic gastro-oesophageal reflux.