Elective intraaortic balloon counterpulsation for high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass operations

BACKGROUND: Dislocations of the heart required for exposure and construction of distal anastomoses often produce hemodynamic instability when performing coronary artery revascularization without using cardiopulmonary perfusion (OPCAB). We report our early experience with elective intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) to enable and facilitate selected high-risk patients to undergo OPCAB. METHODS: Sixteen high-risk patients undergoing multivessel OPCAB using elective IABP are reported. The patients were believed to be at increased risk because of the presence of severe proximal multivessel coronary artery obstruction, ventricular dysfunction, recent acute myocardial infarction, cardiomegaly-cardiomyopathy, and documented cerebral vascular disease. The presence of significant comorbid disease also made the avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass desirable, if at all possible, in all patients. RESULTS: The IABP appeared to facilitate the intraoperative management of our series of patients. This was evidenced by improved hemodynamic stability and virtual elimination of the need for inotropic support during the dislocations of the heart needed for exposure and construction of distal anastomoses. There were no complications related to use of IABP. There was one death. CONCLUSIONS: We believe this strategy to use IABP selectively can allow surgeons to safely extend the benefits of OPCAB procedures to high-risk patients and avoid dangerous hemodynamic instability that otherwise, often occurs.     

Aggressive preoperative use of intraaortic balloon pump in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: The use of the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting has been traditionally associated with a high complication rate and adverse outcomes. However, recent reports show that many of these catastrophic outcomes can be avoided by preoperatively placing the IABP in high-risk patients. To further validate these reports, we defined a set of liberal criteria for preoperative IABP insertion and applied them to a series of elderly patients (70 years or older) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Two hundred six consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were retrospectively reviewed. A rapid recovery protocol emphasizing reduced cardiopulmonary bypass time, an anesthetic protocol for early extubation, perioperative administration of corticosteroids and thyroid hormone, and aggressive diuresis was applied to all patients. Patients who required an urgent operation because of failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, a critical left main stenosis (70% or greater), pronounced left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction 40% or less), or unstable angina refractory to medical therapy or who required an emergency reoperation received preoperative IABP support. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate for the entire group was 4.4%. There were 97 patients (47%) who received a preoperative IABP (group II) in comparison with 109 patients (53%) who did not fulfill the preoperative insertion criteria (group I). Patients in group II had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean, 46% versus 59%, p<0.001) and a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (35% versus 17%, p<0.01) and acute myocardial infarction (37% versus 17%, p<0.01) than patients in group I. The average postoperative hospital length of stay for patients in group II was slightly longer than for those in group I (9.0+/-10.5 versus 6.0+/-3.7 days, p<0.01). However, there were no statistically significant differences in complication or mortality rates between the two groups. Only 2 patients (2.2%) had complications related to IABP insertion. Lower extremity ischemia occurred in both patients, and both were treated successfully with thromboembolectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Liberal preoperative insertion of the IABP can be performed safely in high-risk elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, with results comparable to those in lower risk patients.     

A multicenter comparison of intraaortic balloon pump utilization in isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery

BACKGROUND: Single-center studies suggest substantial variation in intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) utilization. Our purpose is to examine IABP utilization over time and across medical centers. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort of 29,961 consecutive patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery, between 1995 and 2000, at 10 centers (eight in northern New England and two in Canada). RESULTS: A total of 2,678 (8.9%) patients received an IABP. The rate of preoperative IABP insertion was 6.3%, and that of intra- or postoperative insertion was 2.6%. During the 6 years, IABP use increased from 7.0% to 10.3% (p(trend) <0.001). Preoperative IABP insertion increased from 5.4% to 7.8% (p(trend) < 0.001). There was no significant increase in intra-/postoperative IABP insertion 1.7% to 3.4% (p(trend) = 0.34). Adjustment for changes in patient and disease characteristics did not substantially alter these results. The rate of IABP use varied substantially by center, from 5.9% to 16.4% (p < 0.001). Adjustment for patient and disease characteristics resulted in variation from 4.8% to 12.8% across the 10 centers (p < 0.001). The adjusted rates of preoperative IABP insertion varied from 3.6% to 13.7% (p < 0.001), and the rates of intra-/postoperative IABP insertion ranged from 1.0% to 5.2% (p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between the rates of preoperative and intra-/postoperative IABP use (r(s) = 0.085, p = 0.815). CONCLUSIONS: During the 6 years, there was a 47% increase in the rate of IABP utilization. Even after adjustment, there was almost threefold variation in IABP use across centers. This variation likely reflects lack of consensus on the appropriate use of the IABP in CABG patients.     

Usefulness of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND: In off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) surgery, the most critical complication is hemodynamic deterioration, which can occur during displacement of the heart to expose the target vessels. Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy improves cardiac performance and facilitates access to the target coronary artery while maintaining hemodynamic stability, especially in high-risk patients. METHODS: One hundred thirty-three consecutive patients who underwent OPCABG through sternotomy between April 2000 and July 2003 were studied. We compared the clinical results of 32 patients who underwent preoperative IABP placement (group 1) with those of 101 patients who did not have IABP placement (group 2). Of the 32 patients satisfying the insertion criteria, 15 had critical left main artery disease, 20 had unstable angina, 5 had acute myocardial infarction, and 5 had left ventricular dysfunction. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the average number of distal anastomoses performed between group 1 and group 2 (3.1 +/- 0.8 versus 3.3 +/- 0.9, p = not significant). The complete revascularization rate was 95% in both group. There was no conversion to on-pump surgery in either group. There was no operative death in group 1 and only 1 death in group 2. In group 1, the number of patients who required prolonged ventilatory support (longer than 48 hours) was higher (3 versus 1, p = 0.036), and there was a higher incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (1 versus 0, p = 0.074). There were no IABP-related complications in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative IABP therapy for high-risk coronary patients is very effective in preventing hemodynamic instability and providing surgical results comparable with those in moderate- to lower-risk patients.     

Elective intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

The beneficial effects of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) in CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have been reported. However, the benefits of insertion of IABP electively in high-risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) have not been established. Six hundred and twenty-five patients who underwent OPCAB form the study group. High-risk patients fulfilling two or more of the following: left main stem stenosis >70%, unstable angina, and poor left ventricular function, who had elective insertion of IABP preoperatively by the open technique (group I; n = 20) were compared with a similar high-risk group that did not (group II; n = 25). There were no significant differences in risk factors between the two groups (Euroscore 5.68). The mean number of grafts was similar. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in the need for inotropes, duration of ventilation, arrhythmias, cerebrovascular, gastrointestinal, and infective complications (p = NS). There were no IABP-related complications. Acute renal failure requiring hemofiltration was higher in group II (n = 5; p < 0.05). Four patients (16%) in group II required postoperative IABP. Although intensive care stay was longer in group I (27.6 +/- 15.3 vs. 18.6 +/- 9.1 hours; p < 0.05), patients in group I were discharged earlier from hospital. There was no difference in mortality between the two groups (n = 1 in each group). In high-risk patients undergoing OPCAB, routine preoperative insertion of IABP electively reduces the incidence of acute renal failure. In addition it avoids the need for emergency insertion postoperatively and may result in earlier discharge.     

主动脉内球囊反搏在小儿中的应用

主动脉内球囊反搏(intraaortic balloon pump，IABP)已广泛应用于成年人心源性休克和围手术期低心排血量综合征的治疗，并取得良好的治疗效果，但在小儿中的应用仍较局限。现就有关IABP在小儿中的应用进行综述，着重分析IABP的适应证和影响在小儿中应用的技术困难和其他因素，介绍小儿IABP应用的技术要点，可能的并发症和治疗效果。在无体外膜式氧合器(ECMO)和左心辅助设备的情况下，小儿心脏直视手术后如不能脱离体外循环机或发生严重低心排血量综合征等，应用IABP治疗可收到较好的效果。     

Axillary artery insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump

We describe a technique for insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump through the axillary artery. This approach is useful in patients requiring intraaortic balloon pump support before cardiac transplantation in that it dramatically increases patient mobility while awaiting a donor heart.     

主动脉内球囊反搏在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用

目的　为提高冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CABG)的手术疗效 ,总结 CABG围手术期主动脉内球囊反搏 (I-ABP)应用的临床经验。　方法　回顾性分析 4 6例 CABG围手术期行 IABP患者的临床资料及 IABP放置的原因、时间和预后。　结果　 34例康复出院 ,住院死亡 12例 ,主要死亡原因 :低心排血量综合征、肺部感染、多器官功能衰竭等。平均 IABP辅助时间 2 8.6± 18.2小时。IABP能使平均动脉压升高 ,心排血量增加 ,有助于心脏功能差的患者脱离体外循环和改善心脏不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术 (OPCAB)中心脏对稳定器压迫的耐受性。　结论　 IABP是一种简单有效的循环辅助手段 ,心功能差的高危 CABG患者应及时放置 IABP。放置 IABP前应查明下肢血管情况 ,避免血管损伤。     

主动脉内球囊反搏在高危冠状动脉旁路移植手术中的预防性应用

目的 探讨主动脉内球囊反搏(LABP)在高危冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)围术期预防性应用的效果.方法 41例高危CABG病人围术期应用IABP辅助,其中20例为预防性应用(Y组),21例为CABG围术期发生严重低心排被迫应用(B组).术前两组性别、年龄、体表面积、心功能、射血分数、病变程度基本一致,仅冠心病合并室壁瘤情况,Y组显著高于B组(70%对38.1%P=0.04).结果 Y组与B组生存率为95.0%对85.7%(P=0.31),IABP应用时间为(72.5±28.91)h对(97.47±47.70)h,(P=0.02),术中严重低血压或心律失常发生率5%对66.7%(P<0.0001).术后呼吸机应用时间(22.0±1.6)h对(39.6±2.1)h(P=0.0015)、ICU停留时间(58.0±1.5)h对(98.5±1.9)h(P=0.003).结论 IABP的预防性应用为高危CABG病人提供了安全保障,术中严重低血压或心律失常发生率低,病情恢复快.     

The effect and role of the intraaortic balloon pumping in off-pump coronary artery bypass

Eighty consecutive patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) were studied. They were divided into group I (n = 10) which received preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP), and group II (n = 70) which did not receive IABP. The indications for preoperative IABP were severe left main coronary artery disease in 7 patients, severe 3 vessel disease in 3 patients, unstable angina in 5 patients, acute myocardial infarction in 3 patients. There was no operative mortality in both groups. The average number of distal anastomosis 2.7/patients in group I and 3.3/patients in group II. There was no differences in ventilator support time, length of stay in the intensive care unit and morbidity between 2 groups. The average postoperative IABP support time was 5.4 hours. There was no IABP-related complication in group I. IABP was very effective to perform OPCAB surgery safety. Preoperative IABP may be effective modality to support OPCAB surgery not only in emergent case but also in elective case.     

Evaluation of preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping for high risk off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

We evaluated the effect of preoperative intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) support in high risk patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Between November 1999 and December 2010, 65 high-risk patients underwent OPCAB with the support of IABP inserted preoperatively. High risks were considered as (1) left main coronary artery stem stenosis > or = 75%, (2) unstable angina requiring intravenous nitrates and heparin, (3) preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 30%, (4) bilateral carotid artery stenosis > or = 75%. There were no hospital deaths or cerebrovascular complications. During operations, hemodynamics was stable with the support of low dose catecholamines, and no patient needed conversion to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. All patients were able to be weaned from IABP within 3 days (mean 5.7 hours) after the operation and were extubated within 4 days (mean 11.5 hours) after the operation. One patient had a peripheral embolism which might be related to insertion of IABP (1.5%). Preoperative IABP in high-risk patients undergoing OPCAB was considered to be useful and safe.     

Is use of the intraaortic balloon pump in octogenarians justified?

Increasing numbers of octogenarians are seen in the operating room or critical care unit with circumstances for which intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) assistance is appropriate, but it has been suggested that the complication rate for IABP use in octogenarians is excessive. From 1980 to 1990, 25 octogenarians needed an IABP in our institution, as an adjunct to operation in 20 patients (1 had repair of a ventricular rupture and 19 underwent coronary grafting); 5 patients did not have operation. The indications for IABP use were unstable angina, 12 (48%); cardiogenic shock, 10 (40%); and difficulty weaning off cardiopulmonary bypass, 3 (12%)--these 3 were the only ones who had insertion through a femoral cut-down. No serious insertion difficulties were noticed with the percutaneous route in the other 22 patients. Without operation, 4 of 5 patients died in the hospital (80%), and the 5th died 2 years 8 months after discharge. After operation, there were two hospital deaths (10%) and two late deaths, neither from cardiac causes. A fatal outcome occurred in 6 of 9 patients with cardiogenic shock. Intraaortic balloon pump-related complications were rare, minor, and unrelated to IABP assistance duration, which ranged from 24 to 146 hours (mean, 49.9 hours). No long-term vascular complications resulted. Hospital stay averaged 22.2 days. At follow-up from 9 to 81 months (mean, 51.8 months), of the 16 survivors, 12 (75%) were in New York Heart Association class I/II and 2 each were in classes III and IV.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

冠状动脉旁路移植术应用主动脉球囊反搏的预后分析

目的 对冠状动脉旁路移植术应用主动脉球囊反搏的预后进行分析,评估应用效果.方法 回顾性分析2001年12月-2011年12月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院收治的82例冠心病患者在冠状动脉旁路移植术后应用主动脉球囊反搏的情况,结合术前左心室射血分数,分析术后早期并发症、病死率、左心室射血分数等相关结果.结果 术后早期死亡14例.43例应用主动脉球囊反搏辅助且无严重并发症(恶性心律失常、肾功能不全),术前平均左心室射血分数为(46.0±1.8)％,术后早期为(50.0±2.7)％(P＜0.05);术前平均左心室舒张末径(66.0±4.1) mm,术后早期为(53.0±2.8) mm (P＜0.05).25例应用主动脉球囊反搏出现了严重并发症.结论合理应用主动脉球囊反搏能够降低术后早期病死率,术后呼吸道感染、肾功能不全为主要并发症.冠状动脉旁路移植术术后积极应用主动脉球囊反搏能降低早期病死率及改善心功能.     

New method for accurate ECG trigger of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND: Retractions of the heart required for exposure and construction of distal anastomoses often decrease R-wave amplitude of ECG and interfere with intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) trigger during off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). Missing R wave trigger results in asynchronous work of IABP and probably produces hemodynamic instability. We report our early experience with a new interface BPI 202 (Osypka Medical, Inc., USA) for sensing accurate ECG trigger for IABP during OPCAB procedure. CASES: Six high-risk patients undergoing multivessel OPCAB using BPI 202 are described. RESULTS: With the new interface BPI 202, simulated R wave signal could be processed from an external dual chamber pacemaker sensing surface R wave. The simulated R wave was successfully used for controlling IABP and secured a synchronous work between the heart and IABP during heart retraction maneuver. BPI 202, an interface for IABP appeared to facilitate the intraoperative management of our series of patients. CONCLUSIONS: We believe BPI 202 can produce a synchronous work of IABP during OPCAB procedures to high-risk patients and avoid dangerous hemodynamic instability.     

Ambulatory intraaortic balloon pump use as bridge to heart transplant

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates a modification of an ambulatory intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) technique used in patients with heart failure of ischemic origin for bridge to transplant. METHODS: In this retrospective review we evaluated the ability to place the ambulatory IABP, any complications, time on device, and success in bridging to transplant on the ambulatory IABP device. In addition, the cost as compared to current ventricular assist devices was determined. RESULTS: Between July 2000 and November 2001, 4 patients have been managed with ambulatory IABP in our combined University of Wisconsin and William S. Middleton Veterans Administration programs. All 4 patients had ischemia as their mode of heart failure, and each had a relative contraindication to standard ventricular assist device use. All 4 patients had ambulatory IABPs successfully placed through the left axillary artery without complication, and were able to ambulate early after ambulatory IABP placement, and increased their rehabilitation status before transplantation. Ambulatory IABP support ranged from 12 to 70 days. All 4 patients have been successfully transplanted and discharged from the hospital. Use of the ambulatory IABP support, even with multiple replacements, translated to 10- to 50-fold savings for each of the reported patients versus standard ventricular assist device use. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of our initial experience, we believe that ambulatory IABP is an excellent mode of support in selected patients, and is cost-effective, as compared to conventional ventricular assist device therapy.     

Effect of preoperative aspirin use in off-pump coronary artery bypass operations

BACKGROUND: The effect of preoperative aspirin use until the day of operation on mortality rate and bleeding risks in patients who had on-pump coronary artery bypass operation has been well documented. However, the effect of aspirin use in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass operation (OPCAB) with regard to postoperative blood loss and morbidity has not been studied. We aimed to determine the effects of continuing aspirin therapy preoperatively. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 340 patients who had first-time OPCAB between January 1998 and September 2001. A propensity score for receiving aspirin until the day of operation was constructed from core patient characteristics. All aspirin users (n = 170) were matched with unique 170 nonaspirin users by identical propensity score. The primary outcome measures were in-hospital mortality rate and hemorrhage-related outcomes (postoperative blood loss in the intensive care unit, reexploration for bleeding, and blood product requirements). Secondary outcome measures were stroke, myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal bleeding, and sternal wound infections. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient characteristics between aspirin users and nonaspirin users. The average postoperative blood loss (845 mL versus 775 mL; p = 0.157) and the rate of reexploration for bleeding (3.5% versus 3.5%; p > 0.99) were similar in aspirin users and nonaspirin users. We found no significant difference between blood product requirements for the two groups. Similarly, we found no significant difference in the incidence of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative aspirin did not increase bleeding-related complications, mortality rate, or other morbidities in patients who had off-pump coronary artery operation.     

Economic impact of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy in high-risk coronary patients

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy in high-risk coronary patients has been demonstrated earlier. METHODS: This study investigates the economic aspect by a detailed cost analysis of pooled information from two previously published randomized studies and 144 consecutive low-risk coronary artery bypass graft operations. Costs for patients receiving preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy before aortic cross-clamping (n = 62) were compared to those in a control group (n = 50). Detailed cost analysis was based on data provided by the hospital finance department. RESULTS: The total hospital costs were as follows: low-risk coronary artery bypass graft operations cost 35,335+/-1,694 Swiss francs ($23,400+/-$1,121); high-risk coronary artery bypass graft without preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy cost 65,892+/-31,719 Swiss francs ($43,637+/-$21,006); and high risk coronary artery bypass graft with preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy cost 41,948+/-10,379 Swiss francs ($27,780+/-$6,874) (p = 0.0015). There were no significant differences in average cost among the preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy in high risk coronary patients is significantly cost-beneficial, With an average saving of 24,000 Swiss francs ($16,000) on the total hospital cost, a 36% cost reduction.     

术前置入主动脉内球囊反搏对高危冠状动脉旁路移植术患者预后的影响

目的比较高危冠心病患者术前预防性置入主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)和被动紧急置入IABP对临床预后的影响. 方法 35例接受冠状动脉旁路移植手术同时需接受IABP置入的患者,根据置入的时机不同分为两组.术前置入组 接受术前预防性置入IABP;对照组术中或术后接受紧急置入IABP.比较两组围术期死亡率、心肌梗死发生率、术后心功能不全和需要正性肌力药物辅助的程度、IABP使用的时间、术后呼吸机辅助时间和重症监护治疗病房(ICU)停留时间. 结果术前置入组围手术期死亡率和心肌梗死发生率分别为11.1%和0%,较对照组低(65.4%,50%;P＝0.007,0.013);两组呼吸机辅助通气时间、IABP使用时间、术后需正性肌力药物辅助时间以及术后平均住ICU时间差别均有显著性意义(P＜0.05). 结论术前预防性置入IABP能降低围术期死亡率、心肌梗死发生率,减少对正性肌力药物的需要量和缩短住ICU时间.