Is there a role for reactive oxygen species in arterial medial elastocalcinosis?

Isolated systolic hypertension results from a gradual stiffening of large arteries, to which medial elastocalcinosis (calcification of elastic lamellae) contributes. There is compelling evidence that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are associated with several disease processes affecting the cardiovascular system, including hypertension. The present study was designed to investigate whether the inhibition of ROS production by alpha-lipoic acid can prevent vascular calcification. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with warfarin (20 mg/kg/day) and vitamin K (15 mg/kg/day) (WVK) for 4 weeks to induce large artery calcification. Subgroups received either a normal diet or a diet supplemented with lipoic acid (1000 mg/kg/day). The WVK treatment produced a small elevation of aortic superoxide levels that did not reach statistical significance. Alpha-lipoic acid reduced the elevation below baseline levels. In rats treated with alpha-lipoic acid, the WVK-induced elevation of pulse wave velocity (an index of arterial stiffness), left ventricular hypertrophy, and aortic, femoral and carotid elastocalcinosis were not prevented. Although a contribution of oxidative stress has been suggested in the aging cardiovascular system, this alteration does not appear to contribute to the calcification process and the subsequent stiffening of large arteries in the animal model tested.     

Is there a role for antibiotics in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Despite many advances in the understanding and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, its pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. An infectious aetiology of rheumatoid arthritis has long been postulated but, even though many continue to believe that there is a 'triggering agent for rheumatoid arthritis', none has been identified. Currently, both sulfasalazine and minocycline have been shown to be effective treatments for rheumatoid arthritis and are being used increasingly. In the case of minocycline, it appears that its ability to inhibit metalloproteases is an important characteristic that may account for some or part of its action against rheumatoid arthritis. Whether the antibacterial effects of these drugs or others are important in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis continues to be investigated.     

Is there a role for inhaled corticosteroids and macrolide therapy in bronchiectasis?

Bronchiectasis is characterised by permanent dilatation of the bronchi that arises from chronic inflammation predominantly caused by bacterial infection. This condition remains a major cause of excess respiratory morbidity and treatment is generally only partly successful. There is an urgent need for improved anti-inflammatory medication to treat bronchiectasis. Two potentially useful therapies are inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and macrolides. The clinical trials that have been performed in bronchiectasis with these two medications can be considered to be preliminary data. This article reviews the anti-inflammatory properties, clinical efficacy and adverse effects of ICS and macrolides.ICS have a large number of potent anti-inflammatory properties. ICS remain the first-line treatment in asthma, reduce exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and may improve lung function and symptoms in cystic fibrosis (CF). Four small clinical trials have assessed the effect of high-dose ICS on bronchiectasis. The main reported effect of these trials was a reduction in sputum volume and this may be a marker of decreased airway inflammation. Other possible benefits included decreased cough and sputum inflammatory cells/biomarkers. ICS have a relatively high prevalence of local adverse effects, and may be associated with ocular complications and osteoporosis. These adverse effects can be minimised by prescribing low doses of the medication.Macrolides have both antibacterial and immunomodulatory properties. Macrolides have less marked immunosuppressive properties than corticosteroids, and effects include decreasing mucous production, inhibiting virulence factors and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, decreasing leukocyte numbers and altering inflammatory mediator release. Macrolides have been shown to be extremely effective in the treatment of diffuse panbronchiolitis, improve lung function and symptoms in asthma and CF, and reduce nasal polyps and secretions in sinusitis. Five small clinical trials have assessed the effect of macrolides on bronchiectasis. Reported benefits include reduced sputum volume, improved lung function and better symptom control. Macrolides are generally well tolerated, although they do have a number of drug interactions. There are concerns about the development of resistance, especially to non-tuberculous mycobacteria, with prolonged macrolide use.The evidence available suggests that both medications have a role in the management of bronchiectasis. More definitive trials of ICS and macrolides in bronchiectasis will clarify the likely benefit of these therapies.     

Is there a role for therapeutic drug monitoring with codeine?

Codeine is an old and commonly used analgesic agent for mild to moderate pain. It is the prototypical "prodrug" in that its analgesic effect is almost wholly dependent on its biotransformation to morphine, a process that is mediated by the polymorphic cytochrome P450 2D6 enzyme. As such, interindividual variability in codeine metabolism and response is a clinical reality, and there has been much progress in characterizing the genetic causes of this variability in diverse populations. Yet despite the potential for both life-threatening adverse reactions and lack of therapeutic effect, codeine is not commonly indicated for therapeutic drug monitoring. This review will discuss the relative role of pharmacogenetics and therapeutic drug monitoring in predicting and/or maintaining adequate and safe analgesia with codeine. The review will end on a discussion of how the marriage of these 2 fields may provide new insights into the mechanisms of codeine-induced toxicity and analgesia.     

Is there a growing role for endocrine therapy in the treatment of breast cancer?

Novel biochemical findings on the molecular mechanisms of estrogen actions may help us to understand some of the unexplained observations seen in breast cancer treatment and suggest new therapeutic opportunities. Thus, apart from the challenge of improving the clinical treatment of patients with advanced disease, results from trials in this setting may reveal new therapeutic principles that may be evaluated in the adjuvant setting. The role of endocrine therapy in metastatic as well as early breast cancer is increasing, and the possibility of improving cure rates for breast cancer by implementing therapy with novel aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting is exciting. While the results from prevention trials are most interesting, suggesting the possibility of reducing breast cancer incidence in high-risk groups, more data are needed before we can decide whether such interventions are warranted in women at high risk of developing breast cancer.     

Is there a role for oral blockade of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors in coronary and cerebrovascular disease?

The success of intravenous platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockers as potent antithrombotic therapies has ignited interest in the research and development of oral agents with the intention of extending the initial clinical benefits proven with intravenous GP IIb/IIIa blockers to long-term care with the use of oral agents. Nonetheless, results of the recently published Blockade of the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor to Avoid Vascular Occlusion (BRAVO) trial support the disappointing results of the earlier published studies, which revealed that the use of oral GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors was associated with an unacceptable increased mortality. Further research to elucidate the mechanism of this increased fatality risk is warranted before any further clinical studies with the oral GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors can be ethically justified.     

NGF and heart: Is there a role in heart disease?

The review emphasizes the role of NGF, the most representative member of the neurotrophins family, in cardiac physiopathology with a particular focus on healing and sprouting processes occurring after tissue damage. Cardiac and circulating NGF levels dramatically increase following myocardial injury (MI). A very early rise of this neurotrophin is indeed observed soon after MI (hours). Such a rise may lead to sympathetic nerve sprouting which may underlie the later genesis of arrhythmias but may also favor the healing process. At later times (months after), when heart failure develops, the opposite is detected and NGF tissue levels are below the normal range, an event that may in turn participate to defective innervation and cardiac failure. Through a careful analysis of preclinical and clinical studies, this review proposes that time is the key variable when studying these opposite changes in NGF expression observed following MI and attempting to interpret and correlate them with cardiac physiopathology. The examination of the results leads to the speculation that NGF modulation may be a pharmacological target for interventions in specific stages of heart dysfunction following MI.     

Is there a future for prenyltransferase inhibitors in cancer therapy?

1. Download : Download high-res image (124KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights? N-Ras and K-Ras resistant to FTIs as a consequence of alternative geranylgeranylation. ? Minimal clinical activity of FTIs in phase I–III trials. ? RASGRP1/APTX-gene expression as predictor of response to tipifarnib in AML.     

Is there a role for charcoal in palliative diarrhea management?

Objective: Symptomatic therapy is an intervention centered entirely on symptom management and pain relief. The utilization of charcoal in diarrhea management is a pertinent example of this type of medical care. Diarrhea is an ailment defined as an escalation in the frequency of bowel movements, unformed stool, abdominal discomfort, and pain. These symptoms can be extremely debilitating for patients, and effectuate frustration as well as severely dampening mood and overall well-being. This narrative review aims to explore the use of charcoal in diarrhea management and its possible benefits in alleviating discomfort associated with these symptoms.

Methods: The authors used PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar searches on recent literature available on the role of activated charcoal in diarrhea management.

Results: It was found that the main precursors of diarrhea include drugs and bacterial infection. Activated charcoal has a firm history in its ability to attract and expel ingested toxins from the gastrointestinal tract. It acts to prevent system absorption of these adverse entities, adsorbing them on the surface of its particles, making it a suitable diarrheal treatment.

Conclusions: Diarrhea can present itself alongside a multitude of treatments and conditions, such as chemotherapy, primary malignancy, intestinal, colorectal and pancreatic cancer, bacterial infection, and irritable bowel syndrome, making activated charcoal a potential therapy in these conditions. In comparison, with other common anti-diarrheal treatments, activated charcoal has exceptionally few side-effects. Overall, further research is necessary in order to wholly determine the effectiveness of charcoal in the management of diarrhea.     

Is there a future for cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease?

Several epidemiological studies have indicated that the long-term use of NSAIDs, most of which are cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors, may reduce the risk of Alzheimer's disease. For this reason, anti-inflammatory COX-inhibiting NSAIDs have received increased attention in experimental and therapeutic trials for Alzheimer's disease. However, several recent efforts attempting to demonstrate a therapeutic effect of NSAIDs in Alzheimer's disease have largely failed. Clinicians and scientists currently believe that this lack of success may be attributable to two key problems: (i) clinical trials of NSAIDs have been conducted in patients with late-stage Alzheimer's disease, wherein advanced neurodegeneration may be refractory to anti-inflammatory drug treatment; and (ii) it is not known which of the large family of NSAIDs (i.e. COX-1, COX-2 or mixed inhibitors) is most efficacious in preventing Alzheimer's disease.The wide list of putative functions for COX in the brain, and the significant functional heterogeneity of NSAIDs, which appear to influence the beta-amyloid (Abeta) neuropathology associated with Alzheimer's disease via both COX-dependent and COX-independent pathways, complicate the interpretation of the mechanisms through which COX-inhibiting NSAIDs may beneficially influence Alzheimer's disease. As discussed in this review, for patients at high risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (e.g. those with mild cognitive impairment), preventative treatment with COX-inhibiting NSAIDs may ultimately represent a viable strategy in the management of clinical Alzheimer's disease. However, the recent evidence showing an increased risk of major cardiovascular events among patients treated with certain COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors leaves many questions unanswered. We suggest that further investigation into the physiological role(s) of COXs in normal health and in disease conditions, and the identification of safer and better tolerated COX inhibitors, will provide renewed impetus to the application of anti-inflammatory strategies for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer's disease.