Risks of mitral valve replacement and mitral valve replacement with coronary artery bypass

One hundred thirty consecutive patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) or MVR with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cold crystalloid cardioplegic solution were analyzed to determine operative mortality and risk factors. Twenty-eight patients had mitral stenosis (MS), 37 had mitral regurgitation (MR), 37 had mixed MS and MR, 23 had MR with coronary artery disease (CAD), and 5 had MS with CAD. Preoperative pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and cardiac index were not different among groups, but patients with MR and CAD had a significantly higher left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and a significantly lower ejection fraction than other groups. Mortality was 7.1% for patients with MS, 5.4% for MR, 8.1% for mixed MS and MR, 0 for MS with CAD, and 21.7% for MR and CAD. Overall mortality was 9.2%. Eleven patients had emergency operations for cardiogenic shock with a mortality of 45%. Nineteen additional patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class IV had MVR or MVR plus CABG with a mortality of 26%. Sixteen patients required intraaortic balloon pump assistance, and 9 survived. Four patients with MR and CAD required the left ventricular assist device, and 3 survived. Excluding patients who had emergency operations, overall mortality was 5.8%. Excluding patients who had emergency operations and patients in NYHA Functional Class IV, overall mortality was 2%. Factors associated with death were cardiogenic shock, NYHA Class IV, LVEDP greater than 15 mm Hg (16% mortality), and age greater than 60 years (15% mortality).     

冠状动脉旁路移植术后长期随访

目的 总结１９８２年至１９９１年间３８例冠状动脉旁路移植术（ＣＡＢＧ）者的长期随访结果,以探讨术前危险因子对ＣＡＢＧ疗效的影响。方法 ３８例中男３６例,女２例。年龄４１－７３岁,平均５５．４岁,７３．７％病人年龄大于５０岁。有心肌梗死发作史者１５例,有心衰史者２例。ＰＴＣＡ失败后急症手术２例,３支,３支以上冠状动脉病变者１９例。心功能Ⅲ级及以上者３０例。应用Ｓｔａｔｉｓｔｉｃａ软件包中的Ｌｏｇｉｓ     

Limits of arterial myocardial revascularization

A prospective study of myocardial blood perfusion after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was conducted in two groups of patients. In group 1, a two-year assessment by exercise thallium myocardial scintigraphy without medical treatment was performed in 122 patients who consecutively underwent CABG with exclusive use of both internal mammary arteries (IMA) and gastroepiploic artery (GEA). In group 2, myocardial function and perfusion were determined by radionuclide investigations performed before and one year after CABG in 100 patients with preoperative LV dysfunction (defined as LV ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 0.40), comparing results of myocardial revascularization performed with either exclusive arterial grafts (arterial group, 54 patients) or one arterial graft (IMA) associated with a sequential vein graft (vein group, 46 patients). In group 1, 21% of patients presented silent residual electric ischemia during exercise stress testing and 26% had reversible scintigraphic ischemic defect despite complete revascularization, 18% of those in the inferior wall bypassed with GEA and 8% in the anterior wall bypassed with the right IMA. In group 2, the significant preoperative ischemia significantly decreased in both the vein group and the arterial group. LV function was significantly improved in the vein group; in contrast there was no modification of LV function in the arterial group. A multivariate analysis showed that the surgical technique used and the preoperative LVEF were independent prognostic factors of the postoperative myocardial outcome, with a positive impact of the vein use on the postoperative myocardial function recovery. It is important to recognize that arterial grafts have some limitations in the ability to supply blood flow for coronary circulation that may induce postoperatively silent residual myocardial ischemia and a lack of LV function recovery.     

Factors influencing early and late survival in patients with combined mitral valve replacement and myocardial revascularization and in those with isolated replacement

During a 5 1/2-year period, 251 patients underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) at our institution: 76 had combined MVR and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and 175 without major coronary artery disease (CAD) had isolated MVR. In-hospital mortality for MVR + CABG was 13.2% (10/76); it was 8.6% (6/70) when patients with preoperative mechanical support were excluded, 7.9% (5/63) for elective operations, and 8.2% (5/61) for nonischemic mitral disease. Overall, in-hospital mortality for isolated MVR was 6.3% (11/175); it was 4.4% (7/161) excluding patients requiring mechanical support and 3.1% (5/157) for elective operations. Of a host of clinical characteristics in patients with MVR +CABG, few were found to influence in-hospital mortality: age greater than 60 years, degree of incapacitation (New York Heart Association Functional Class IV), previous history of myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure, cardiac enlargement (cardiothoracic index greater than 50%), and ischemic mitral disease (33.3% in-hospital mortality; p less than 0.05). Of the invasive variables, only one influenced in-hospital mortality: wall motion score greater than 10 (31.6% in-hospital mortality; p less than 0.01). Of the operative variables studied, the number of grafts (3 or more: 33.3% in-hospital mortality; p less than 0.05), the need for mechanical support (47.4% in-hospital mortality; p less than 0.0001), and emergency operation (38.5% in-hospital mortality; p less than 0.005) had a significant effect on mortality. The type of mitral lesion, the type of prosthesis, the extent of CAD or the completeness of revascularization, the presence of pulmonary hypertension, and atrial fibrillation appeared to have no influence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular function using retrograde continuous cold blood cardioplegia]

Patients with poor left ventricular function or those requiring urgent surgery may have more extensive ischemic myocardial injury if myocardial preservation is incomplete. We have performed coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) aimed at complete revascularization in such cases using RC-CBCP, which is considered more effective on myocardial preservation during aortic cross-clamping in particular to protect ischemic area distal to severe coronary artery stenosis or obstruction. In the present study, in 25 patients with poor left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEF less than or equal to 0.3) including 10 patients who required urgent surgery, the operative results were evaluated. All the distal and proximal anastomoses of grafts (average 2.5 grafts) were completed during one aortic cross-clamping using RC-CBCP, therefore graft flow was obtained immediately after release of the aortic clamping. Though this method required 142 minutes of a mean aortic cross-clamping time, myocardial protection was considered to be preferable judging from postoperative isoenzymatic evaluation and improved ventricular function. Fifteen patients with elective CABG were all alive and restored to NYHA class I to II. Among 10 patients requiring urgent CABG, 4 patients with acute myocardial infarction died but others were restored to NYHA class I to II. We conclude that it is important to aim at complete coronary revascularization in patients with poor left ventricular function and RC-CBCP achieves more effective myocardial protection during CABG in the patients.     

Complete revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates whether patients with coronary artery disease and severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) benefit from complete revascularization by multivessel coronary artery bypass. METHODS: From April 1994 to May 2002, 42 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at our institution had impaired left ventricular (LV) function [an ejection fraction (EF) of 30% or less]. The average preoperative LVEF was 23.8%. The mean number of grafts was 4.6. Complete revascularization by multivessel bypass grafting was the goal for all patients. RESULTS: Thirty days mortality was 0 and hospital mortality was 2.4%. The mean graft patency rate for 35 (83%) patients at one month was 98.8%. The mean postoperative LVEF improved significantly, from 23.8% to 35.2% (p<0.05), and the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification was improved in most patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival at 5 years was 83.1%, and that of the cardiac event-free rate at 5 years was 77.5%. CONCLUSION: For patients with poor LV function, complete surgical revascularization by multivessel bypass grafting can be performed safely, with satisfactory hospital mortality and long-term results.     

Perioperative myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery disease with and without aorta--coronary artery bypass grafts.

The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) was examined in 148 patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent 226 noncardiac surgical procedures. In 168 operations in 99 patients who had prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) there were no perioperative MI's whereas in the 49 patients who had not undergone prior CABG who underwent 58 noncardiac operations, there were three MI's (5 percent). The lower (p less than 0.02) incidence of perioperative MI in patients with CAD who had had prior CABG suggests a protective effect for subsequent noncardiac operation, which could not be explained by other differences in cardiac status between the groups. All three MI's occurred in patients with three-vessel CAD, evidence that this should be added to prior MI as a significant risk factor. The study indicates also that patients with prior CABG have less risk of MI during and following anesthesia and noncardiac operation than do patients without CABG who have had a previous MI.     

Preoperative C-reactive protein and outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) is a predictor of early and late outcome after coronary angioplasty, but there is scant data on its impact on the outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: The predictive value of preoperative CRP was evaluated in a series of 764 patients who underwent on-pump CABG. RESULTS: During the in-hospital stay, 13 patients (1.7%) died, 45 (4.5%) developed low cardiac output syndrome, and 28 (3.7%) suffered minor or major cerebrovascular complications. Patients with a preoperative serum concentration of CRP>/=1.0 mg/dL had a higher risk of overall postoperative death (5.3% vs 1.1%, p = 0.001), cardiac death (4.4% vs 0.8%, p = 0.002), low cardiac output syndrome (8.8% vs 3.7%, p = 0.01), and any cerebrovascular complication (4.4% vs 3.5%, p = 0.66). Preoperative serum concentration of CRP>/=1.0 mg/dL was significantly more frequent among patients with history of myocardial infarction, diabetes, lower limb ischemia, low left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA class IV, and in those undergoing urgent or emergency operation. At multivariate analysis, preoperative serum concentration of CRP >/= 1.0 mg/dL (p = 0.01, O.R.: 6.97) and left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.01, O.R.: 0.95) were independent predictors of postoperative death. Postoperative mortality rate was 0.3% among patients with preoperative CRP < 1.0 mg/dL and an ejection fraction >/=50%, whereas it was 21.4% among those with a preoperative CRP >/= 1.0 mg/dL and an ejection fraction less than 50% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative serum concentration of CRP in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is an important determinant of postoperative outcome.     

Internal mammary artery graft at reoperation: risks, benefits, and methods of preservation

To determine the effect of a prior internal mammary artery (IMA) graft on coronary artery bypass reoperation (CABR), we reviewed our experience with 410 consecutive patients: 313 received only saphenous vein grafts at initial coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and 97 received at least one IMA graft at CABG. Cardiac catheterization data before CABG were available in 110 patients (56 received only saphenous vein grafts, 54 received at least one IMA graft), allowing comparison of left ventricular function at CABG and CABR. Injury of the IMA graft occurred in 5 patients (1 death), but presence of an IMA graft was not an independent predictor of morbidity or mortality. Overall, the incidences of complications and deaths were higher in patients with saphenous vein grafts than in patients with IMA grafts, though not significantly so. Internal mammary artery grafts better preserved cardiac function: patients with IMA grafts had worse left ventricular function before CABG but better left ventricular function before CABR than patients with saphenous vein grafts. Left ventricular function deterioration from before CABG to before CABR was significantly less in patients with IMA grafts. We conclude that the risk of CABR is not increased by a previously constructed IMA graft and that left ventricular function is better preserved at CABR when an IMA graft was constructed at the initial operation.     

The return of clinically evident ischemia after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Although survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most serious outcome information, the quality of life in living patients is largely determined by the freedom from ischemic events. The return of angina, acute myocardial infarct and sudden death were studied in a large (n = 5880) population of patients undergoing CABG between 1971 and 1987. The freedom from angina pectoris was 95%, 83% and 63% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively, after surgery. Early return of angina was related to both procedure incremental risk factors (incomplete revascularization and non-use of the internal mammary (thoracic) artery (IMA) as a conduit) and patient incremental risk factors (aggressiveness of the atherosclerotic process and severity of preCABG symptoms). Late angina return was related to patient risk factors including coexisting factors (hyperlipidemia and hypertension), preCABG symptom severity and gender (female). The freedom from an acute fatal or non-fatal postCABG myocardial infarct was 99%, 96% and 85% at 1, 5 and 10 years after surgery. The incremental risk factors for early infarction were related to incomplete revascularization, but late infarction was related to lipid levels, coexisting diseases (diabetes, positive family history) and non-use of IMA to LAD. The freedom from sudden death was 99.8%, 99% and 97% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively, after surgery. The incremental risk factors were dominated by the severity of the left ventricular dysfunction. The freedom from any ischemic event (any of the previous three) was 93%, 79% and 54% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively, after surgery. The incremental risk factors included all those cited above for the specific components. Patient-specific predictions validate the influences of these risk factors. They demonstrate that unlike the profound influence of the use of the IMA on survival, there is little benefit of the use of the IMA on return of ischemic events over and above the effect of revascularization per se. The study demonstrates that most patients will experience return of ischemic symptoms within a period of 15-20 years after surgery, but that this is most likely to be return of angina and rarely sudden death.     

Revascularization alone (without mitral valve repair) suffices in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy and mild-to-moderate mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND: Whether or not to perform adjunctive mitral repair in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy with moderately severe mitral regurgitation (MR) remains controversial. METHODS: We examine the clinical and echocardiographic outcome after isolated CABG in 49 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and 1+ to 3+ MR undergoing surgical revascularization. The patients were identified for analysis of mitral valve-related issues from a larger series of 183 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (MUGA ejection fraction < or = 30%) undergoing CABG by a single surgeon from 1986 to 1996. Patient age was 66.3 years (mean, range 45 to 83 years). There were 5 women (10.2%) and 44 men (89.8%). Mean ejection fraction was 22.4% with a range of 10% to 30%. Thirty-four patients had preoperative congestive heart failure (70%) and 12 (25%) had pulmonary edema. Number of grafts was 2.8 (mean, range 1 to 5). The MR was 1+ in 18 patients (37.5%), 2+ in 26 (52%) and 3+ in 5 patients (10.5%). RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 2.0% (1 of 49 patients). Ejection fraction improved from 22.0% to 31.5% (p < 0.05) after CABG. Mean degree of MR improved with CABG alone from 1.73 to 0.54 (p < 0.05) as measured at a mean interval of 36.9 months from CABG. New York Heart-Association congestive heart failure class improved from 3.3 to 1.8 (p < 0.05). Long-term survival was 88%, 65%, and 50% at 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively. No patient required subsequent mitral valve operation or heart transplantation in long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy and mild-to-moderate MR, isolated CABG (without mitral valve, repair) suffices, producing dramatic improvement in ejection fraction, in congestive heart failure, and in degree of MR, with excellent (relative) long-term survival. The improvement in MR likely results from improved left ventricular function and size consequent upon revascularization.     

Revascularization in severe ventricular dysfunction (15% < OR = LVEF < OR = 30%): a comparison of bypass grafting and percutaneous intervention

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the optimal approach to revascularization of patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. METHODS: We conducted a single-center observational study of 117 consecutive patients who had severe LV dysfunction (15% < OR = LV ejection fraction < OR = 30%) and underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG, n = 69) or percutaneous revascularization (n = 48) between 1992 and 1997. RESULTS: The CABG group was younger (62 versus 67 years, p = 0.026), and fewer previous bypasses (7% versus 40%, p < 0.0001) and fewer prior percutaneous revascularizations (16% versus 42%, p = 0.0019) were noted. More vessels were revascularized (3 +/- 0.8 versus 1.5 +/- 0.7, p < 0.0001), and revascularization was more complete by CABG (84% versus 48%, p < 0.0001). Morbidity and mortality at 30 days were similar, and there was no significant difference in 3-year survival (73% versus 67%), although 3-year cardiac event-free survival (52% versus 25%, p = 0.0011) and 3-year target vessel revascularization-free survival (71% versus 41%, p < 0.0001) were significantly better in the CABG group, and LV ejection fraction was significantly improved after CABG. In the subgroup of patients 65 years of age or older and those without proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions, significant benefit of CABG in cardiac event-free and target vessel revascularization-free survival disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: We found that in clinically selected patients with severe ventricular dysfunction, CABG compared with percutaneous revascularization achieves more complete revascularization, improved LV function, fewer cardiac events, and fewer target vessel revascularizations, but does not affect mid-term survival. A prospective controlled trial with defined criteria for treatment assignment is warranted to confirm our results regarding the two revascularization strategies in patients with severe LV dysfunction.     

Concomitant peripheral artery disease and asymptomatic coronary artery disease: a management strategy

The present study examines the use of routine coronary angiography (CAG) before elective peripheral artery disease (PAD) surgery and the early outcome and technical features of simultaneous coronary revascularization and PAD surgery in PAD patients with asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD). We performed preoperative CAG in 82 patients who were undergoing elective peripheral arterial bypass surgery and who had no diagnosis or symptoms of ischemic heart disease. The 82 patients were grouped according to the criteria of <70% stenosis, >70% stenosis, and no coronary stenosis. In patients with >70% coronary artery stenosis, we performed simultaneous peripheral artery bypass surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), while the other patients underwent peripheral artery bypass only. Preoperative coronary angiography revealed CAD in 69.5% (n = 57) of patients. Patients with CAD were more likely to be older, hypertensive, and diabetic than patients without CAD (all p < 0.05). Preoperative electrocardiography showed that only 3/57 (5.3%) patients with CAD had ischemic heart disease. Of the 61 patients who underwent peripheral artery bypass, 27 (47.4%) underwent simultaneous CABG. Of the patients with CAD, 78.9% (45/57) required peripheral artery bypass, whereas 64.0% (16/25) of patients without CAD required peripheral artery bypass (p = 0.11). Comparing simultaneous CABG and peripheral artery bypass in PAD patients with CAD and isolated peripheral artery bypass in PAD patients regardless of CAD, the only significant difference was in operating time (362.00 +/- 79.18 vs. 246.55 +/- 79.15 min, p = 0.00). When compared with PAD patients with CAD who underwent isolated peripheral artery bypass, the results were similar. Two patients who had CAD and underwent isolated peripheral artery bypass died (p = 0.16). Patients with peripheral arterial obstructive disease should be examined for CAD using CAG, regardless of whether they have symptomatic ischemic heart disease, and simultaneous CABG and peripheral artery bypass is safe and feasible.     

Safety and efficacy of internal mammary artery grafts for left main coronary artery disease. A preliminary report

Questions regarding the relative safety and efficacy of internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts versus saphenous vein grafts (SVG) in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) have not been specifically addressed in the literature. To elucidate this point, we analyzed 196 patients with LMCAD who underwent myocardial revascularization between January 1975 and December 1981, 98 by IMA and SVG and 98 by SVG, IMA was used most often to bypass the left anterior descending (LAD). Chi Square and "t" tests were performed on all demographic, cardiac and operative data comparing IMA to SVG. All results were non-significant, indicating that the two groups were comparable. Anginal pattern was progressive or unstable in 93%. IMA was used in 4 patients who were on intra-aortic balloon pump. The mean number bypass grafts per patient was 3.1. Postoperative complications were comparable for both groups, including early and late myocardial infarction. Overall operative mortality was 2.6%. Results of a survival analysis indicated no significant difference in the mortality rates of patients operated on by SVG versus IMA-SVG. Cumulative mortality rates at a mean followup of 20.5 months were 12.2% for SVG and 7.1% for IMA patients. Significant mortality risk factors were ejection fraction less than 55% (p less than 0.05); and perioperative myocardial infarction (p less than 0.001). Twenty-five patients with recurrent chest pain underwent repeat cardiac catheterization. This revealed 10 of 10 patent IMA grafts, 6 of 8 single patent SVG to LAD and 6 of 9 patent sequential vein grafts to the diagonal and LAD arteries.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Global left ventricular impairment and myocardial revascularization: determinants of survival

Of 2,782 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from 1970 through 1979, 196 exhibited severe global impairment of left ventricular (LV) wall motion preoperatively (LV score, greater than or equal to 15; ejection fraction, less than 0.40 in all patients and less than 0.30 in 67%). The initial 89 patients (Group 1) underwent CABG without potassium chloride cardioplegia. The subsequent 107 patients (Group 2) were given potassium chloride cardioplegia intraoperatively. Group B patients received more grafts per patient (3.1 versus 2.5; p less than 0.001) and were completely revascularized more often (72.9% versus 58.4%; p less than 0.05). Operative mortality was lower in Group B (3.7% versus 12.4%; p less than 0.025), and 5-year cumulative survival was better in Group B (88.8% versus 63.9%; p less than 0.0001). Preoperative congestive heart failure resulted in higher operative mortality (14.3% versus 4.5%; p less than 0.05) and lower 5-year survival (65.0% versus 81.8%; p less than 0.02). Complete revascularization led to higher 5-year survival (82.2% versus 66.0%; p less than 0.02) but did not alter operative mortality significantly (6.9% versus 9.1%). Potassium chloride cardioplegia may influence operative survival favorably by reducing perioperative myocardial infarction in patients with severe LV dysfunction. Long-term survival relates to completeness of revascularization and severity of congestive heart failure as variables independent of methods of myocardial protection.     

Coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly

One hundred fifteen patients over 65 years of age were operated on at our institution for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The operative mortality was 5% compared with an overall operative mortality of 2.5% in the last five years for 1,500 persons with CABG. Increased risk factors included qualification for New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV, ejection fraction of less than 35%, diffuse disease requiring more than five grafts, and age over 75 years. At one year after operation, 81% of the patients were clinically improved, and the survival rate was 91%. Patients over 65 years of age in NYHA classes II and III with good left ventricular function requiring four or less bypass grafts appeared to have an excellent prognosis both acutely and during a one-year follow-up period.     

Role of coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass surgery prior to abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy

It is well recognized that patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms have a high incidence of coronary artery disease, and that the major cause of death in patients undergoing aneurysmectomy has been acute myocardial infarction. In order to assess the incidence of significant coronary artery disease, cardiac catheterization was performed on 42 consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Thirty-six patients (85.7%) had significant anatomic coronary artery disease. Interestingly, all 8 patients with ejection fractions of less than 50% had triple vessel disease or left main disease, and 12 of 34 patients with ejection fractions greater than or equal to 50% had triple vessel disease or left main disease. Of the 30 patients who were NYHA Class I or Class II, 14 (46.7%) had triple vessel disease or left main disease. All 20 patients with triple vessel disease or left main disease underwent myocardial revascularization 7 to 10 days prior to abdominal aneurysmectomy. No patients had a perioperative myocardial infarction either following coronary artery bypass surgery or abdominal aortic aneurysm resection, and there were no operative mortalities. Although this was not a randomized study, it would seem from these results that in selected patients, myocardial revascularization prior to abdominal aneurysmectomy can decrease the incidence of acute myocardial infarction and also decrease operative mortality. It is presently recommended that all symptomatic patients, patients with ejection fractions of less than 50%, and asymptomatic patients with ejection fractions of greater than or equal to 50% with positive exercise radionuclide angiography undergo cardiac catheterization prior to aneurysmectomy, and those patients with left main disease or severe coronary artery disease undergo myocardial revascularization prior to aneurysm resection.     

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Heart Transplantation in End-Stage Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparison of Hemodynamic Improvement and Ventricular Function

Heart transplantation has now become an accepted treatment for end-stage coronary heart disease (CAD). However, the limited supply of suitable donor organs imposes constraints upon the decision of whether patients are selected for transplantation or for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). From April 1986 until the end of March 1992, 265 patients with end-stage CAD involving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 10% to 30% and predominant angina pectoris underwent CABG. All patients received an average of 2.9 ± 0.3 venous grafts. Intraaortic balloon pumps were implanted in 30 patients (11.3%) who began to develop low cardiac output syndrome intraoperatively. The actuarial survival rate was 87.8% after 2 years and 86.9% after 3 years. LVEF was measured in 35 patients via left heart catheterization 12 months after their operations and was found to have increased from a mean of 23.8% to 38.1%. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure had decreased from 16.2 mmHg to an average of 12.1 mmHg. Swan-Ganz catheterization was performed on 120 patients 6 months postoperatively. The pulmonary wedge pressure had reduced significantly from 18.1 mmHg to a mean of 12.7 mmHg (p < 0.01). From 1990 until the end of March 1992, 55 patients with CAD and predominant heart failure received transplants. Their 2-year survival rate was 66.3%. Mean LVEF was 55.6% postoperatively. We conclude that CABG is adequate for patients who have end-stage CAD and angina pectoris symptoms, and that it significantly improves hemodynamic functions. Patients suffering predominantly from heart failure (NYHA Class IV) can be transplanted and subsequently regain normal heart function. (J Card Surg 1994;9:77–84)     

The results of radial artery Y-graft for complete arterial revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Harvesting of multiple arterial grafts is commonly associated with prolonged operating times and increased trauma in complete arterial coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Using sequential grafting techniques, CABG is possible with only two arterial grafts in multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). However, sequential grafting may not be convenient for all circumstances and sometimes surgical technique may be challenging. We present our experience in the use of radial artery (RA) Y-graft on a routine basis. METHODS: Between January 1996 and November 2001, 127 patients (aged 63+/-8 years) with the diagnosis of multi-vessel disease underwent complete arterial revascularization using left internal mammarian artery (LIMA) and RA. Left ventricular ejection fraction ranged from 23 to 65% (mean 51+/-11%). Triple-vessel disease was present in 73.2% of patients. We used the division technique of RA during harvesting and formation of one or more composite Y-grafts of the RA itself to allow end-side rather than sequential anastomoses without any significant decrease the usable conduit length. The results of this technique were compared with the data of patients (n=109) who underwent completely arterial CABG with the use of the multiple arterial grafts in the same period. RESULTS: LIMA was anastomosed to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) system in all patients. Two to four (mean 2.8+/-0.6) anastomoses were performed with RA Y-graft per patient. Proximal end of the radial graft was anastomosed to LIMA (60.6%) or aorta (39.4%). Mean operating time was 185 (45 min; bypass time, 68+/-23 min; and cross-clamp time, 49+/-17 min). Perioperative intraaortic balloon pump was necessary in five patients (3.9%). There was no operative mortality or morbidity. During the follow-up period of 2-30 months, none of the patients had any complication. Postoperative coronary angiography in 54 patients (42.5%) documented excellent early patency rates (LIMA 100%, and RA 98.1%). CONCLUSIONS: We believe that keeping our technique in their armamentarium will be useful for cardiac surgeons as an alternative method during complete arterial revascularization. This approach allows for complete arterial revascularization in multi-vessel CAD using only single IMA and RA grafts with excellent early results.     

Pleural and pulmonary complications after bilateral internal mammary artery grafting.

The long-term patency of internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts in coronary bypass surgery is superior to that of saphenous vein grafts. To investigate if bilateral IMA grafting increases the complication rate, especially pleural problems, 100 patients with bilateral and 100 with unilateral IMA grafts were retrospectively studied. Preoperatively the groups did not differ in age, previous myocardial infarction, ejection fraction, NYHA classification or previous respiratory disease, but the coronary artery status was poorer in the bilateral IMA group. Postoperative pleural drainage was greater after bilateral IMA grafting (1074 vs. 497 ml, p less than 0.0001). Reoperation was required for bleeding in 10% of the patients with unilateral, and 20% of those with bilateral IMA grafting (p less than 0.05), and more blood was transfused in the latter group (5.9 vs. 4.7 units, p less than 0.01). Pleural effusion at discharge from hospital or 3 months postoperatively, pain in the sternotomy wound, pain on breathing and postoperative use of nitroglycerin did not differ significantly between the groups. Bilateral IMA grafting thus led to more bleeding and reoperations than single IMA grafting, but did not cause excessive pulmonary complications.