Should axillary ultrasound be used in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ?

BackgroundWe evaluated the usefulness of axillary ultrasound (US) in patients with core biopsy–proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).MethodsPreoperative axillary US, fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and sentinel lymph node (SLN) data from women with DCIS were reviewed.ResultsEighty-two women with DCIS underwent axillary US. In 16 women (19.5%) US was abnormal; however, FNA was negative in all cases. Sixty-one women (74%) underwent SLN surgery; 2 were positive for macrometastasis (3%) and 1 had isolated tumor cells. None of them had an abnormal US. Axillary US did not change the management in any of the cases.ConclusionsAxillary US and FNA did not change the management in any of the 82 cases. In women with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, positive nodes are uncommon and unlikely to be detected by axillary US. Routine preoperative axillary US is not recommended for pure DCIS on core biopsy.     

Intradermal Isotope Injection: A Highly Accurate Method of Lymphatic Mapping in Breast Carcinoma

Background: The combined approach of radioactive tracer and blue-dye mapping of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) has evolved into a safe and effective alternative to routine axillary node dissection in specific patient populations with breast carcinoma. The optimal route of injection for the isotope has not been clearly defined. To assess the intradermal route of isotope injection, we prospectively evaluated 100 patients with biopsy-proven invasive breast carcinoma with SLN biopsy followed by planned axillary node dissection.Methods:All patients were given an intradermal injection of Tc-99m sulfur colloid and an intraparenchymal injection of blue dye. All patients underwent a complete axillary node dissection. Each sentinel node was serially sectioned and examined by immunohistochemistry.Results: Sentinel nodes were successfully identified in 99% of cases. Forty-six patients had axillary metastases; of these, four had falsely negative sentinel nodes (false-negative rate, 9%). The false-negative rate was 0 of 24 (0%) for T1 tumors, 2 of 18 (11%) for T2 tumors, and 2 of 4 (50%) for T3 tumors. Three of four patients with false negatives had palpable, clinically suspicious axillary nodes found intraoperatively. If these cases are excluded, the accuracy of the procedure was 100% for T1 and T2 tumors. Of the 42 positive axillae identified by SLNB (true positives), 40 were localized using the intradermal injection of radioisotope; in 13 of these cases, this was the only method that identified the true-positive node.Conclusion: These data demonstrate that intradermal injection of radioactive tracer is an effective method of localizing the SLN in cases involving small breast cancers. Further investigation is warranted before this technique is adopted for use in larger breast cancers. Intraoperative examination and biopsy of any suspicious nonsentinel nodes are critical.Presented at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 16–19, 2000.     

Unfiltered Sulfur Colloid and Sentinel Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer: Technical and Kinetic Considerations

Background: There are few clinical data on technical limitations and radiocolloid kinetics related to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer.Methods: In 70 clinical node-negative patients, unfiltered^99mTc sulfur-colloid was injected peritumorally and cutaneous hot spots were mapped with a gamma probe. SLN biopsy was performed followed by axillary lymph node dissection. Missed radioactive nodes (nodes not under hot spots) were removed from axillary lymph node dissection specimens and submitted separately.Results: At least one hot spot was mapped in 69 patients (98%) and SLNs were retrieved in 62 (89%). No radiolabeled nodes were found in five (7%) and only nodes not under hot spots were retrieved in three patients (4%). Residual nodes not under hot spots were retrieved in 17 patients (24%) in whom at least one SLN specimen had been found. Diffuse radioactivity around the radiocolloid injection site impeded identification of all radiolabeled nodes during SLN biopsy, and was responsible for one of two false negatives (20 node-positive patients; false-negative rate 10%). Hot spot radioactivity, number of radiolabeled nodes, and nodal radioactivity did not change with time interval from radiocolloid injection to surgery (0.75–6.25 hours).Conclusions: Although SLN localization rate is high, intraparenchymal injection may predispose to failure of radiocolloid migration, failure to identify SLNs because of high radiation background, and false-negative outcomes. Alternative routes of radiocolloid administration should be explored.     

Surgical management of the axilla: do intramammary nodes matter?

Background

The therapeutic significance of intramammary lymph nodes is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to identify the appropriate surgical management of the axilla in intramammary node-positive patients undergoing sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy.

Methods

A retrospective review of consecutive patients staged between September 1996 and December 2004 was performed. Intramammary node identification and pathologic findings were compared with the status of axilla.

Results

Among 7,140 patients, intramammary nodes were identified in 151 (2%). Positive intramammary nodes were identified in 36 patients (24%). Axillary disease was identified in 61% of intramammary node-positive patients. No additional axillary disease was identified when axillary lymph node dissection was performed in intramammary node-positive patients with negative axillary SLN biopsy results.

Conclusions

The results suggest that completion axillary lymph node dissection may be based on the status of axillary SLN biopsies in clinically node negative patients when intramammary lymph node metastases are identified in the breast specimens.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: How Many Radioactive Nodes Should be Removed?

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become a standard method of staging patients with cutaneous melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy usually is performed by intradermal injection of a vital blue dye (isosulfan blue) plus radioactive colloid (technetium sulfur colloid) around the site of the tumor. Intraoperative gamma probe detection has been shown to improve the rate of SLN identification compared to the use of blue dye alone. However, multiple sentinel nodes often are detected using the gamma probe. It is not clear whether these additional lymph nodes represent true sentinel nodes, or second-echelon lymph nodes that have received radiocolloid particles that have passed through the true sentinel node. This analysis was performed to determine the frequency with which these less radioactive lymph nodes contain metastatic disease when the most radioactive, or hottest, node does not.Materials and Methods: In the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial, 1184 patients with cutaneous melanoma of Breslow thickness 1.0 mm or more had sentinel lymph nodes identified. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed by injection of technetium sulfur colloid plus isosulfan blue dye in 99% of cases. Intraoperative determination of the degree of radioactivity of sentinel nodes (ex vivo) was measured, as well as the degree of blue dye staining.Results:Sentinel nodes were identified in 1373 nodal basins in 1184 patients. A total of 288 of 1184 patients (24.3%) were found to have sentinel node metastases detected by histology or immunohistochemistry. Nodal metastases were detected in 306 nodal basins in these 288 patients. There were 175 nodal basins from 170 patients in which at least one positive sentinel node was found and more than one sentinel node was harvested. Blue dye staining was found in 86.3% of the histologically positive sentinel nodes and 66.4% of the negative sentinel nodes. In 40 of 306 positive nodal basins (13.1%), the most radioactive sentinel node was negative for tumor when another, less radioactive, sentinel node was positive for tumor. In 20 of 40 cases inding a positive sentinel node other than the hottest node.Conclusions: If only the most radioactive sentinel node in each basin had been removed, 13.1% of the nodal basins with positive sentinel nodes would have been missed. It is recommended that all blue lymph nodes and all nodes that measure 10% or higher of the ex vivo radioactive count of the hottest sentinel node should be harvested for optimal detection of nodal metastases.Preliminary findings presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Orlando, Florida, March 4–7, 1999.     

Lymphatic tumor burden negatively impacts the ability to detect the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the preferred method of nodal breast cancer staging. Techniques of SLN biopsy rely on transport of interstitial molecules through mammary lymphatics. Lymphatic flow may be disrupted by tumor emboli. Increased lymphatic tumor burden may be responsible for failure to identify the sentinel lymph node in patients with breast cancer. A prospective database of 110 patients who had SLN biopsy between January 2001 and December 2002 was analyzed. The number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes was used as a measure of lymphatic tumor burden. SLN was found in 94 per cent of cases. It was not found in seven patients; five of them had extensive axillary metastases (71%) compared to 23 per cent when SLN was found (P = 0.001). The average number of metastatic lymph nodes was larger when SLN was not found compared to when SLN was found (12.8 vs. 3.9, respectively, P = 0.002). Increasing numbers of metastatic nodes correlated with decreasing success in SLN biopsy (P = 0.075). The incidence of axillary metastases is higher in patients in whom the sentinel node is not found. High lymphatic tumor burden may have a causative role in SLN biopsy technical failure. Axillary dissection should be performed if SLN is not found, regardless of the tumor size or histology.     

Selective Extirpation of Tattooed Lymph Node in Combination with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Management of Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

IntroductionAxillary dissection has little diagnostic and therapeutic benefit in node-positive breast cancer patients in whom axillary disease has been completely eradicated after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ypN0). We sought to assess the efficacy of an algorithm used for the identification of the ypN0 patient consisting of intraoperative evaluation of sentinel and tattooed (initially positive) lymph nodes.MethodsIncluded were T1 and T2 breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive axillary lymph nodes marked with carbon who were referred for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by a surgery. Axillary dissection was performed only in the patients with residual axillary disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on ultrasound or with metastases described in the sentinel or tattooed lymph nodes either intraoperatively or in the final histology.ResultsOut of 62 initially included node-positive patients, 15 (24%) were spared axillary dissection. The detection rate of tattooed lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 81%. The ypN0 patients were identified with 91% sensitivity and 38% specificity using ultrasound and intraoperative assessment of both sentinel and tattooed lymph node according to the final histology.Discussion/ConclusionLymph node marking with carbon dye is a useful and cost-effective method, which can be successfully implemented in order to reduce the number of patients undergoing axillary dissection. Low specificity of the presented algorithm was caused mostly by the overestimation of residual axillary disease on ultrasound.     

Subsequent axillary surgery after sentinel lymph node biopsy: Results from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit 2006–2010

ObjectivesTo use data from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit (BQA) to examine the patterns of completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in women treated for early breast cancer in Australia and New Zealand and to compare it to the Australian and New Zealand guidelines in cases of both positive and negative SLN results.Materials and methodsPatients were sub grouped as having primary tumours ≤3 cm and >3 cm and further analysed according to year of surgery, SLN status and final nodal status where cALND was recorded. Multivariate analysis was performed examining tumour size, grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), HER2 and oestrogen receptor status, patient age and number of positive sentinel nodes as predictors for subsequent axillary surgery.Results14879 patients were identified from 2006 to 2010. 79.8% of patients with a positive SLN result underwent cALND. Age >70 years and a greater number of involved SLN predicted no cALND among SLN positive patients. 10.3% of patients who had a negative SLN result underwent cALND. Younger age, higher grade, lymphovascular invasion and tumour size >3 cm predicted cALND among SLN negative patients.ConclusionsAccording to the BQA from 2006 to 2010 the Australian and New Zealand guideline recommendations for SLN positive patients to have cALND and SLN negative patients not to have cALND were adhered to in 79.8% and 89.7% of cases respectively.     

A positive intramammary lymph node does not mandate a complete axillary node dissection

BackgroundWe hypothesized that even in the face of a positive intramammary lymph node (IMLN) a negative axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) reliably stages the axilla and complete axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) can be avoided.MethodsA literature search identified 386 publications that included IMLNs and SLN biopsies. Patients with a positive IMLN and negative axillary SLN who underwent a CALND were included. A review of our database was also performed.ResultsTwenty-one cases in the literature met our criteria. A review of our database resulted in 2 additional cases. Twenty-three patients were identified who had a positive IMLN, negative axillary SLN biopsy, and underwent a CALND. In all cases, the CALND was negative.ConclusionsAn axillary SLN biopsy accurately represents the disease status of the axilla in cases with a positive IMLN. CALND can be avoided in the setting of a positive IMLN and a negative axillary SLN biopsy.     

Feasibility and oncological safety of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients with a local recurrence

ObjectivesTo investigate the role and feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with a local recurrence and no clinically positive axillary lymph nodes.Materials and MethodsA total of 71 patients underwent SLNB for breast cancer recurrence. At first surgery, they had received SLNB (46.5%), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (36.6%) or no axillary surgery (16.9%).ResultsLymphatic migration was successful in 53 out of 71 patients (74.6%) and was significantly higher in patients with previous SLNB or no axillary surgery than in those with previous ALND (87.9% vs. 53.8%; p = 0.009). Aberrant lymphatic migration pathways were observed in 7 patients (13.2%). The surgical SLNB was successfully performed in 51 patients (71.8%). In 46 patients (90.2%) the SLN was histologically negative, in 3 patients (5.9%) micrometastastatic and in 2 patients (3.9%) macrometastatic. The 2 patients with a macrometastates in SLN underwent ALND, In 4 out of the 18 patients with failure of tracer migration ALND, performed as surgeon’s choice, did not find any metastatic node. After a median follow-up period of 39 months (range: 2–182 months), no axillary recurrence has been diagnosed.ConclusionA SLNB in patients with locally recurrent breast cancer, no previous ALND and negative axillary lymph nodes is technically feasible and impacts on the ALND rate. In patients who at primary surgery received ALND, migration rate is significantly lower, aberrant migration is frequent and no clinically useful information has been obtained.     

The effect of lymphatic tumor burden on sentinel lymph node biopsy results

Increasing tumor burden in the axilla, as determined by the number of positive lymph nodes, adversely affects sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and false-negative rates. The University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study is a prospective, multi-institutional study. All enrolled patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by complete level I/II axillary dissection. Participating surgeons represent a variety of practice settings, mostly community-based private practice. A total of 229 surgeons enrolled 2206 patients between August 1997 and November 2000. SLN biopsy was performed using blue dye injection alone, radioactive colloid alone, or a combination of the two agents. Two key parameters used to measure SLN biopsy success are the SLN identification rate and SLN false-negative rate. The overall SLN identification and false-negative rates were 92.5% and 8.0%, respectively. With increasing numbers of positive axillary nodes, there was a decreased sentinel node identification rate. There was no difference in the false-negative rate with increasing axillary tumor burden. Increased tumor burden in the axilla (as determined by the mean number of positive nodes) is associated with failure to identify a SLN in some cases, but is not an explanation for false-negative results. Standard axillary dissection should be performed when a SLN cannot be identified.     

Ultrasonographically guided injection improves localization of the radiolabeled sentinel lymph node in breast cancer

Background: Several reports have demonstrated the accurate prediction of axillary nodal status (ANS) with radiolocalization and selective resection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in breast cancer. To date, no technique has proven to be superior in localizing the SLN. Methods: 1.0 mCi of clear unfiltered^99mtechnetium sulfur colloid was injected under ultraso-nographic (US) guidance around the perimeter of the breast lesion (palpable and nonpalpable) or previous biopsy site. Resection of the radiolocalized nodes was performed, followed by complete axillary lymph node dissection (AXLND). Results: Forty-two breast cancer patients underwent SLN biopsy after US-guided radiopharmaceutical injection. The SLN was localized in 41 patients (98%). The type of previously performed diagnostic biopsy did not influence the ability to localize the sentinel lymph node. Pathology revealed nodal metastasis in 7 of the 41 evaluable patients (17%). ANS was accurately predicted in 40 of 41 patients (98%). Conclusions: Early experience with radiologicalization and selective resection of SLN in breast cancer remains promising. Use of US-guided injection facilitates localization of the SLN, perhaps as a result of more accurate placement of the radionuclide marker. Use of this technique allowed for effective management of patients regardless of tumor size or the extent of prior biopsy, thereby expanding the potential number of eligible patients for SLN biopsy. The opinions and assertions herein are the private ones of the authors and are not to be construed as official policy or reflecting the views of the Department of Defense. Support for this work provided by the National Cancer Institute (grant U01 CA65121 — 02).     

SPECT/CT scans allow precise anatomical location of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer and redefine lymphatic drainage from the breast to the axilla

BackgroundHistorical studies of lymphatic drainage of the breast have suggested that the lymphatic drainage of the breast was to lymph nodes lying in the antero-pectoral group of nodes in the axilla just lateral to the pectoral muscles. The purpose of this study was to confirm this is not correct.MethodsThe hybrid imaging method of SPECT/CT allows the exact anatomical position of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in the axilla to be documented during pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy (LS) in patients with breast cancer. We have done this in a series of 741 patients. The Level I axillary nodes were defined as anterior, mid or posterior. This was related to the anatomical location of the primary cancer in the breast.ResultsA SLN was found in the axilla in 97.8% of our patients. Just under 50% of SLNs located in the axilla were not in the anterior group and lay in the mid or posterior group of Level I axillary nodes. There was a SLN in a single node field in 460 patients (63%), two node fields in 261(36%), three node fields in 6 and four node fields in 1 patient.ConclusionAxillary lymphatic drainage from the breast is not exclusively to the anterior (or antero-pectoral) group of Level I nodes.SynopsisSPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphy shows that the breast does not always drain to the anterior group of Level I lymph nodes in the axilla but may drain to the mid axilla and/or posterior group in about 50% of patients with breast cancer regardless of the location of the cancer in the breast. These data redefine lymph drainage from the breast to axillary lymph nodes.     

Role of Combined Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Node Sampling in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer

Axillary lymph node status is a prognostic marker in breast cancer management, and axillary surgery plays an important role in staging and local control. This study aims to assess whether a combination of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using patent blue dye and axillary node sampling (ANS) offers equivalent identification rate to dual tracer technique. Furthermore, we aim to investigate whether there are any potential benefits to this combined technique. Retrospective study of 230 clinically node-negative patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for single T1–T3 tumours between 2006 and 2011. Axillae were staged using a combined blue dye SLNB/ANS technique. SLNs were localized in 226/230 (identification rate 98.3 %). Three of one hundred ninety-two patients with a negative SLN were found to have positive ANS nodes and 1/4 failed SLNB patients had positive ANS nodes. Thirty-four of two hundred twenty-six patients had SLN metastases and 11/34 (32.4 %) also had a positive non-sentinel lymph node on ANS. Twenty-one of twenty-four (87.5 %) node-positive T1 tumours had single node involvement. Nine of thirty-eight node-positive patients progressed to completion axillary clearance (cALND), and the rest were treated with axillary radiotherapy. Axillary recurrence was nil at median 5 year follow-up. Complementing SLNB with axillary node sampling (ANS) decreases the unavoidable false-negative rate associated with SLNB. Appropriate operator experience and technique can result in an SLN localization rate of 98 %, rivalling a dual tracer technique. The additional insight offered by ANS into the status of non-sentinel nodes has potential applications in an era of less frequent cALND.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Is It Indicated in Patients With High-Risk Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ and Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ With Microinvasion?

Background: Axillary lymph node status is the strongest prognostic indicator of survival for women with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of sentinel node metastases in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) and DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM).Methods: From November 1997 to November 1999, all patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy for high-risk DCIS (n = 76) or DCISM (n = 31) were enrolled prospectively in our database. Patients with DCIS were considered high risk and were selected for sentinel lymph node biopsy if there was concern that an invasive component would be identified in the specimen obtained during the definitive surgery. Patients underwent intraoperative mapping that used both blue dye and radionuclide. Excised sentinel nodes were serially sectioned and were examined by hematoxylin and eosin and by immunohistochemistry.Results: Of 76 patients with high-risk DCIS, 9 (12%) had positive sentinel nodes; 7 of 9 patients were positive for micrometastases only. Of 31 patients with DCISM, 3 (10%) had positive sentinel nodes; 2 of 3 were positive for micrometastases only. Six of nine patients with DCIS and three of three with DCISM and positive sentinel nodes had completion axillary dissection; one patient with DCIS had an additional positive node detected by conventional histological analysis.Conclusions: This study documents a high incidence of lymph node micrometastases as detected by sentinel node biopsy in patients with high-risk DCIS and DCISM. Although the biological significance of breast cancer micrometastases remains unclear at this time, these findings suggest that sentinel node biopsy should be considered in patients with high-risk DCIS and DCISM.     

Frequency of sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with favorable breast cancer histologic subtypes

BACKGROUND: The need for axillary nodal staging in favorable histologic subtypes of breast cancer is controversial. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage T1-2, N0 breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective, multi-institutional study. All patients underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy followed by completion level I/II axillary dissection. RESULTS: SLN were identified in 3,106 of 3,324 patients (93%). Axillary metastases were found in 35% and 40% of patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma and infiltrating lobular carcinoma, respectively. Among tumor subtypes, positive nodes were found in 17% of patients with pure tubular carcinoma, 7% of patients with papillary cancer, 6% of patients with colloid (mucinous) carcinoma, 21% of patients with medullary carcinoma, and 8% of patients with DCIS with microinvasion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with favorable breast cancer subtypes have a significant rate of axillary nodal metastasis. Axillary nodal staging remains important in such patients; SLN biopsy is an ideal method to obtain this staging information.     

Feasibility of axillary ultrasound in the quality assessment of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of high-resolution axillary ultrasound (AU) in detecting the rate of recurrence after a negative sentinel node (SN) biopsy in patients with breast cancer and without additional axillary dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The operating oncologic surgeon performed 196 consequent sentinel node biopsies during surgery of breast cancer. The sentinel nodes were identified by using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative gamma probe and Patent Blue dye. A routine postoperative follow-up of the patients were performed every 3rd month including clinical examinations, blood chemistry and mammography. After 31 months (range 14-49 months), a high-resolution AU was performed for 107 patients with a negative sentinel node during surgery and without axillary dissection, to visualize any abnormal lymph nodes in the axilla. If necessary, large core biopsies were undertaken to obtain histology of abnormal axillary nodes. RESULTS: The SNs were visualized during preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in 167/196 (85%) and found during the surgery in 163/167 (98%) of patients. The mean number of removed SN were 1.7+/-0.8. The SN metastasis were found in 29% (56/196) of patients. During the follow-up, abnormal nodes were identified during AU in only 4/107 patients. Core biopsies confirmed benign histology in three patients and one case of lymphoma was detected. CONCLUSIONS: There were no axillary recurrences of breast cancer after a negative SN biopsy during the 2.6 year follow-up. Axillary ultrasound is a useful tool in the quality control of patients with negative SN biopsy and without diagnostic axillary dissection.     

Estadificación ganglionar tras terapia sistémica primaria en mujeres con cáncer de mama y afectación ganglionar al diagnóstico

ObjectiveThe main objective of this study is to analyze the efficacy of combined axillary marking (lymph node clipping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)) for axillary staging in patients with primary systemic treatment (PST) and pathologically confirmed node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis. The secondary objective is to determine the impact of lymph node marking in the suppression of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in the study group.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study in which lymph node staging was performed using wire localization of positive lymph nodes and a SLNB with dual tracer. All patients who presented no metastatic involvement of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) or clip/wire-marked lymph node were spared an ALND. The multidisciplinary committee agreed on axillary treatment for patients with lymph node involvement.ResultsEighty one patients met the inclusion criteria. We identified and extirpated the clip/wire-marked node in 80 of 81 patients (98.8%), with SLNB performed successfully in 88,9% of patients. The SLN and wire-marked node matched in 78.9% of patients; 76.2% of patients did not undergo ALND.ConclusionsThe combined axillary marking (clip and SLNB) in patients with metastatic lymph node at diagnosis and PST offers a high identification rate (98.8%%) and a high correlation between the wire-marked lymph node and the SLN (78.9%%). This procedure has enabled the suppression of ALND in 76.2% of patients.     

Patterns of Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is gaining acceptance as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and pattern of disease recurrence after SLNB.Methods: Two-hundred twenty-two consecutive patients undergoing SLNB from April 6, 1998, to October 27, 1999, and who were 24 months out from their procedure were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Retrospective chart review and data analysis were performed to identify variables predictive of recurrence.Results: The median patient follow-up was 32 months (range, 24–43 months). A total of 159 patients (72%) were sentinel lymph node (SLN) negative and had no further axillary treatment. Five of these patients (3.1%) developed a recurrence (one local and four distant), with no isolated regional (axillary) recurrences. Sixty-three patients (28%) were SLN positive and underwent a subsequent axillary lymph node dissection. Six of these patients (9.5%) developed a recurrence (three local, one regional, and two distant). Pathologic tumor size (P < .001), lymphovascular invasion (P = .018), and a positive SLN (P = .048) were all statistically significantly associated with disease recurrence.Conclusions:With a minimum follow-up of 24 months, patients with a negative SLN and no subsequent axillary treatment demonstrate a low frequency of disease recurrence. This supports the use of SLNB as the sole axillary staging procedure in SLN-negative patients.     

Morbidity in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Node Metastases Undergoing Delayed Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) Compared with Immediate ALND

Background Patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases need delayed completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if intraoperative assessment of SLN is not employed. This study was designed to compare morbidity in patients undergoing complete ALND in the first (and only) operation versus those undergoing the two-step procedure (SLN biopsy followed by delayed completion ALND). Methods Secondary analysis of the Axillary Lymphatic Mapping Against Nodal Axillary Clearance (ALMANAC) randomized trial compared 83 patients with SLN metastases who proceeded to delayed completion ALND (two-step ALND) with 96 node-positive patients who underwent ALND as the only axillary procedure (one-step ALND). Outcome variables were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results The 83 SLN-positive patients undergoing completion ALND were younger (p = 0.038) compared with the one-step ALND group. There was no difference in lymphedema, sensory loss, intercostobrachial (ICB) nerve division rates, impairment of shoulder movement, infection rate, or time to resumption of normal day-to-day activities after surgery between the two groups. Median axillary operative time for completion ALND in the two-step group was significantly higher than one-step ALND (33 min vs. 25 min, p = 0.004). The median hospital stay for the second surgery in the two-step group was similar to one-step ALND (6 days). The total median hospital stay (first and second surgery) was significantly higher for the two-stage procedure (10 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). Conclusion A two-stage axillary node dissection procedure in patients with SLN metastases has similar arm morbidity to one-stage ALND. The second surgery is associated with increased axillary operative time and total hospital stay.