Urban–rural differences in breast cancer incidence in Egypt (1999–2006)

ObjectiveTo describe urban–rural differences in breast cancer incidence in Gharbiah, Egypt and to investigate if these differences could be explained by known risk factors of breast cancer.MethodsWe used data from the population-based cancer registry of Gharbiah, Egypt to assess breast cancer incidence from 1999 through 2006. The Egyptian census provided data on district-specific population, age, and urban–rural classification. Incidence patterns of breast cancer by district and age-specific urban–rural differences were analyzed.ResultsOverall, incidence rate of breast cancer was three to four times higher in urban areas than in rural areas (60.9/10⁵-year for urban areas versus 17.8/10⁵-year for rural areas; IRR = 3.73, 95% CI = 3.30, 4.22). Urban areas had consistently higher incidence of breast cancer across all age-groups for all years. Higher incidence of breast cancer was also seen in the more developed districts of Tanta and El-Mehalla.ConclusionsHigher incidence of breast cancer in urban and more developed populations might be related to higher exposure to xenoestrogens, as well as other endocrine disruptors and genotoxic substances.     

Breast cancer screening using synthesized two-dimensional mammography: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the screening performance of synthesized mammography (SM) plus digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with digital mammography (DM) plus DBT or DM alone.MethodsMedline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2021. Eligible population-based studies on breast cancer screening comparing SM/DBT with DM/DBT or DM in asymptomatic women were included. A random-effect model was used in this meta-analysis. Data were summarized as risk differences (RDs), with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsThirteen studies involving 1,370,670 participants were included. Compared with DM/DBT, screening using SM/DBT had similar breast cancer detection rate (CDR) (RD = −0.1/1000 screens, 95 % CI = −0.4 to 0.2, p = 0.557, I² = 0 %), but lower recall rate (RD = −0.56 %, 95 % CI = −1.03 to −0.08, p = 0.022, I² = 90 %) and lower biopsy rate (RD = −0.33 %, 95 % CI = −0.56 to −0.10, p = 0.005, I² = 78 %). Compared with DM, SM/DBT improved CDR (RD = 2.0/1000 screens, 95 % CI = 1.4 to 2.6, p < 0.001, I² = 63 %) and reduced recall rate (RD = −0.95 %, 95 % CI = −1.91 to −0.002, p = 0.049, I² = 99 %). However, SM/DBT and DM had similar interval cancer rate (ICR) (RD = 0.1/1000 screens, 95 % CI = −0.6 to 0.8, p = 0.836, I² = 71 %) and biopsy rate (RD = −0.05 %, 95 % CI = −0.35 to 0.24, p = 0.727, I² = 93 %).ConclusionsScreening using SM/DBT has similar breast cancer detection but reduces recall and biopsy when compared with DM/DBT. SM/DBT improves CDR when compared with DM, but they have little difference in ICR. SM/DBT could replace DM/DBT in breast cancer screening to reduce radiation dose.     

Risk factors for breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis differ from those for invasive recurrence

BackgroundBreast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ is rare, making it difficult to predict which patients are at risk and to identify whether risk factors for this outcome are the same as those for invasive recurrence. We aimed to identify whether risk factors for invasive recurrences are similar to those for breast cancer death after a diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ.MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was queried for female patients diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ. Cumulative incidence was estimated by treatment group using competing risks. Competing risks regression was then performed for the development of in-breast invasive recurrence with competing risks of breast and non–breast cancer death. Competing risks regression was then again performed for development of breast cancer mortality with the competing risk of non–breast cancer death.ResultsA total of 29,515 patients were identified. Of them, 164 patients suffered breast cancer mortality without an intervening invasive recurrence, and 44 suffered breast cancer mortality after an invasive in-breast recurrence. On competing risks analysis for invasive in-breast recurrence, significant factors included lesion size >5 cm (hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.24–2.04, P < .001), diffuse disease (hazard ratio = 0.0005, 95% confidence interval 0.0003–0.0007, P < .001), other race (hazard ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.10–1.52, P = .002), Black race (hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.46, P = .04), age at diagnosis (hazard ratio = 0.99, confidence interval 0.98–1.00, P = .02), low-grade disease (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.96, P = .02), lumpectomy with radiation (hazard ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.77, P < .001), and mastectomy (hazard ratio = 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.30–0.44, P < .001). Significant factors for breast cancer mortality included age at diagnosis (hazard ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.05, P < .001), Black race (hazard ratio = 2.88, 95% confidence interval 2.08–3.99, P < .001), diffuse disease (hazard ratio = 6.02, 95% confidence interval 1.39–26.07, P = .02), lumpectomy with radiation (hazard ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.36–0.72, P < .001), and mastectomy (hazard ratio = 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.50–0.92, P = .02).ConclusionOur results suggested that risk factors for in-breast invasive recurrence after a diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ differ from risk factors for breast cancer mortality and development of metastatic recurrence. In-breast invasive recurrence is not the only consideration for breast cancer specific mortality in ductal carcinoma in situ patients.     

Smoking and survival of breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis of cohort studies

ObjectivesPublished articles reported controversial results about the association of breast cancer survival with smoking. Hence, a meta-analysis was performed to investigate this association.MethodsA comprehensive search was performed to identify relevant cohort studies (up to May 31st, 2016). In the current smoking and former smoking v. never smoking analyses, the fixed- or random-effect model was selected based on the heterogeneity test among studies. And the heterogeneity was measured using Q test and I² statistic. Publication bias was estimated using Egger's regression asymmetry test.ResultsThirteen articles with 44 studies were included. Compared with never smokers, current smokers have a higher breast cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality, with pooled hazard ratio (HR) (HR = 1.30 95%CI: 1.16–1.45; I² = 52.4%) and (HR = 1.59, 95%CI: 1.41–1.78; I² = 87.1%), respectively. While former smokers tend to have a moderately increased all-cause mortality (HR = 1.10, 95%CI: 1.07–1.12; I² = 0.0%), but there was no significant association between former smoking and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.90–1.02; I² = 0.0%).ConclusionThe present evidence indicates that current smoking leads to higher breast cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality than never smoking in breast cancer patients. However former smoking just causes a mild increase in all-cause morality, but not breast cancer-specific mortality.     

Prognostic value of geriatric assessment in older patients with advanced breast cancer receiving chemotherapy

IntroductionThe prognostic value of geriatric assessment in older patients with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy is largely unknown.MethodsFifty-five patients with advanced breast cancer aged 70 years or older were assessed by Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE), Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Levels of albumin, hemoglobin, creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase were measured. Patients completing at least four cycles of chemotherapy were reassessed by GFI and MMSE and mortality was evaluated using Cox regression analysis.ResultsThe mean age was 76 year (SD 4.8). Inferior MNA and GFI scores were associated with increased hazard ratios for mortality: 3.05 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44–6.45; p = 0.004) and 3.40 (95% CI: 1.62–7.10; p = 0.001), respectively. Physical aspects of frailty worsened during the course of chemotherapy. Laboratory values were not associated with assessment scores nor were they predictive for mortality.ConclusionsMalnutrition and frailty, rather than cognitive impairment and laboratory values, were associated with an increased mortality risk in these elderly breast cancer patients with advanced breast cancer.     

Changing pattern in the clinical presentation of breast cancer in the absence of a screening program over a period of thirty-three years in Iran

ObjectiveTo survey the proportion of stages at the presentation of the disease without a screening program, among a population of breast cancer patients that is as a representative sample of the country in a distinct period.Materials and methodsThe population of the current study is found among the female breast cancer patients who were referred to oncology centers in northeastern Iran over a thirty-three-year period from 1980 to 2012.ResultsFour thousand patients were divided into three time periods consisting of 521 cases from 1980 to 1990, 1178 cases from 1991 to 2001, and 2302 cases from 2002 to 2012. While there was no difference in the proportions of T1 and T3 tumors, T2 tumors showed an increase (P = 0.001) and T4 tumors a decrease (P = 0.000) during these periods. There was no change in the proportion of stage I, however the proportion of stage II had risen (P = 0.000), while that of stage III (P = 0.002), and stage IV (P = 0.000) had fallen. The study's urban and rural populations experienced a similar trend in this respect, with the exception that the rural population exhibited more striking changes during the study's recent years.ConclusionAfter a thirty-three-year follow up on breast cancer in northeastern Iran, it is obvious that this disease is now presented in its earlier stages even in the absence of a screening program. In spite of this, the proportion of T1 disease and those tumors are discovered by a screening program has not significantly changed.     

Variation in the management of early breast cancer in rural and metropolitan centres: Implications for the organisation of rural cancer services

The study examines the management and outcomes of women with early invasive breast cancer treated in rural and metropolitan centres over a nine-year observation period. A prospective audit of the treatment and outcomes of 2081 women with early breast cancer who underwent potentially curative surgery between 1997 and 2006 in metropolitan Canberra or in the surrounding rural region was completed. Overall, there was good agreement between published guidelines and the treatment received by the women in the study. However, women treated in rural centres were less likely to receive postoperative radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery, or to undergo axillary lymph node surgery or sentinel lymph node biopsy compared with women treated in metropolitan centres. Surgery in a rural centre was associated with increased breast cancer recurrence (HR = 1.54, p < 0.001) and increased breast cancer mortality (HR = 1.84, p < 0.001), after adjustment for age and tumour characteristics. Non-cancer related mortality was increased in women treated in rural centres compared with women travelling to a metropolitan centre for surgery (HR = 2.08; p = 0.005). There were differences in both the care provided and treatment outcomes between women treated in rural centres and women treated in metropolitan centres. However, the increased non-cancer related mortality in women treated in rural centres suggests an increased medical comorbidity in this group. Initiatives supporting rural-based surgeons to adopt new procedures such as sentinel node biopsy may help to optimise rural breast cancer treatment.     

A prospective cohort study of the safety of breast cancer surgery during COVID-19 pandemic in the West of Scotland

IntroductionIn order to minimise the risk of breast cancer patients for COVID-19 infection related morbidity and mortality prioritisation of care has utmost importance since the onset of the pandemic. However, COVID-19 related risk in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery has not been studied yet. We evaluated the safety of breast cancer surgery during COVID-19 pandemic in the West of Scotland region.MethodsA prospective cohort study of patients having breast cancer surgery was carried out in a geographical region during the first eight weeks of the hospital lockdown and outcomes were compared to the regional cancer registry data of pre-COVID-19 patients of the same units (n = 1415).Results188 operations were carried out in 179 patients. Tumour size was significantly larger in patients undergoing surgery during hospital lockdown than before (cT3-4: 16.8% vs. 7.4%; p < 0.001; pT2 – pT4: 45.5% vs. 35.6%; p = 0.002). ER negative and HER-2 positive rate was significantly higher during lockdown (ER negative: 41.3% vs. 17%, p < 0.001; HER-2 positive: 23.4% vs. 14.8%; p = 0.004). While breast conservation rate was lower during lockdown (58.6% vs. 65%; p < 0.001), level II oncoplastic conservation was significantly higher in order to reduce mastectomy rate (22.8% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.001). No immediate reconstruction was offered during lockdown. 51.2% had co-morbidity, and 7.8% developed postoperative complications in lockdown. There was no peri-operative COVID-19 infection related morbidity or mortality.Conclusionbreast cancer can be safely provided during COVID-19 pandemic in selected patients.     

A Population-Based Cohort Study on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Latin America: Methods and Preliminary Results. The PLATINO Study Phase II

BackgroundThe PLATINO baseline study, conducted from 2003 to 2005 in five Latin American cities (São Paulo, Mexico City, Montevideo, Santiago, Caracas), showed a high prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Methods/designA follow-up study was conducted in three out of the five centers (Montevideo, Santiago, and São Paulo) after a period of 5, 6 and 9 years, respectively, aimed at verifying the stability of the COPD diagnosis over time, the evolution of the disease in terms of survival, morbidity and respiratory function, and the analyses of inflammatory and genetic biomarkers in the blood. Some questions were added to the original questionnaire and death certificates were obtained from the national official registries.ResultsThe fieldwork has been concluded in the three centers. From the original samples in the PLATINO study phase i, we were able to locate and interview 85.6% of patients in Montevideo, 84.7% in Santiago and 77.7% in São Paulo. Individuals who could not be located had higher education levels in Brazil, and were more likely to be current smokers in Santiago and São Paulo than in Montevideo. The overall quality of spirometries was ≥80% according to American Thoracic Society criteria. The number of deaths was 71 (Montevideo), 95 (Santiago) and 135 (São Paulo), with death certificates obtained from the national mortality registries for 76.1%, 88.3% and 91.8% of cases in Montevideo, Santiago and São Paulo, respectively.ConclusionsThis study shows that it is possible to perform population-based longitudinal studies in Latin American with high follow-up rates and high-quality spirometry data. The adequacy of national mortality registries varies among centers in Latin America.     

Clinicopathologic characteristics of breast cancer in BRCA-carriers and non-carriers in women 35 years of age or less

PurposeBreast cancer diagnosed in women 35 years of age or less accounts for <2% of all breast cancer cases. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of early onset breast cancer are not well defined in BRCA mutation carriers and non-carriers.Methods194 women diagnosed with breast cancer at 35 years of age or less who had BRCA1/2 mutation testing were included in the study. Logistic regression models were fit to determine the associations between clinical variables and BRCA status.ResultsThirty-two (17%) and 12 (6%) patients had BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively. BRCA1-carriers had a higher likelihood of a positive family history (FH) of breast and/or ovarian cancer (P = 0.001), or first-degree relatives diagnosed with breast cancer at <50 years old (P = 0.001) compared to non-carriers. BRCA2-carriers were more likely to have a FH of male breast cancer compared to noncarriers (P = 0.02). Among BRCA2-carriers, the age at first full-term pregnancy was younger in ER-negative cases compared with ERpositive cases (19.5 vs. 28.5 years old; P = 0.01). BRCA1-carriers with a later age at menarche were more likely to have a later stage at diagnosis (P = 0.04). Non-carriers with a lower BMI were more likely to have lymph node involvement (P = 0.03).ConclusionsSeveral associations were identified between reproductive risk factors or BMI and disease characteristics. Further characterization may result in a better understanding of the trends in young onset breast cancer in BRCA-carriers and non-carriers.     

Should women with early breast cancer under 40 years of age have a routine 21-gene recurrence score testing: A SEER database study

PurposeTo investigate the effect of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) on chemotherapy-decision making and prognosis in breast cancer patients aged <40 years.MethodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, we included patients aged <40 years with tumor size ≤5 cm, node negative, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer between 2004 and 2015. Correlations among the 21-gene RS, chemotherapy decision-making and prognosis were analyzed.ResultsWe included 2721 patients in this study. According to TAILORx cutoffs, 352 (12.9%), 1814 (66.7%), and 555 (20.4%) patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cohorts, respectively. The 21-gene RS categories were associated with the probability of receiving chemotherapy, with 7.1%, 33.4%, and 77.1% of patients in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk cohorts treated with chemotherapy, respectively (P < 0.001). Those in the intermediate-risk cohort were significantly less likely to receive chemotherapy over time (P = 0.008), and the trends of chemotherapy receipt were stable in the low-risk and high-risk cohorts over time. Multivariate analysis showed that the 21-gene RS was an independent prognostic indicator for breast cancer specific survival. In the stratified analysis, the receipt of chemotherapy was associated with better breast cancer specific survival in the high-risk cohort (P = 0.028), but not in the intermediate-risk cohort (P = 0.223).Conclusions21-gene RS has clinical implications for young breast cancer patients with respect to optimizing chemotherapy-decisions. Despite increasing rates of chemotherapy receipt in young patients, more studies are needed to determine the definitive effect of chemotherapy in young patients with three RS categories.     

Twenty-year outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: The Leipzig experience

ObjectiveMinimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery involving left anterior descending coronary artery grafting with the left internal thoracic artery through a left anterior small thoracotomy is being routinely performed in some specified centers for patients with isolated complex left anterior descending coronary artery disease, but very few reports regarding long-term outcomes exist in literature. Our study was aimed at assessing and analyzing the early and long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients who underwent MIDCAB procedures and identifying the effects of changing trends in patient characteristics on early mortality.MethodsA total of 2667 patients, who underwent MIDCAB procedures between 1996 and 2018, were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the year of surgery: group A, 1996-2003 (n = 1333); group B, 2004-2010 (n = 627) and group C, 2011-2018 (n = 707). Groupwise characteristics and early postoperative outcomes were compared. Long-term survival for all patients was analyzed and predictors for late mortality were identified using Cox proportional hazards methods.ResultsThe mean age was 64.5 ± 10.9 years and 691 (25.9%) patients were female. Group C patients (log EuroSCORE I = 4.9 ± 6.9) were older with more cardiac risk factors and comorbidities than groups A (log EuroSCORE I = 3.1 ± 4.5) and B (log EuroSCORE I = 3.5 ± 4.7). Overall and groupwise in-hospital mortality was 0.9%, 1.0%, 0.6%, and 1.0% (P = .7), respectively. Overall 10-, 15-, and 20-year survival estimates for all patients were 77.7 ± 0.9%, 66.1 ± 1.2%, and 55.6 ± 1.6%, respectively.ConclusionsMIDCAB can be safely performed with very good early and long-term outcomes. In-hospital mortality remained constant over the 22-year period of the study despite worsening demographic profile of patients.     

Breast cancer diagnosis and mortality by tumor stage and migration background in a nationwide cohort study in Sweden

IntroductionSurvival in breast cancer patients has steadily increased over the years, but with considerable disparities between individuals with different migration background and social position. We explored differences in diagnosis and all-cause mortality in breast cancer patients by stage of disease at the time of diagnosis and by country of birth, while considering the effect of comorbidity, regional and socio-demographic factors.MethodsWe used Swedish national registers to follow a cohort of 35,268 patients (4232 foreign-born) with breast cancer between 2004 and 2009 in Sweden. We estimated relative risk ratio (RRR) for diagnosis, hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality and relative excess rate (RER) for breast cancer mortality using multinomial logistic regression models, multivariable Cox proportional hazard, and Poisson regression, respectively.ResultsWe observed 4178 deaths due to any causes. Among them 418 women were born abroad. Foreign-born patients were on average 3 years younger at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and had higher risk of stage II tumors compared with Sweden-born women (RRR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.00–1.19). Risk of dying was 20% higher in foreign-born compared with Sweden-born breast cancer patients, if the tumor was diagnosed at stages III-IV after adjustment for age at diagnosis, education, county of residence and Charlson's comorbidity index (HR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.95–1.51 and RER = 1.21, 95% CI 0.95–1.55).ConclusionsThe worse prognosis in foreign-born patients with advanced tumors compared with Sweden-born patients is not explained by educational level or comorbidity. The reasons behind the observed disparities should be further studied.     

A high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio are associated with a worse outcome in inflammatory breast cancer

IntroductionInflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an uncommon, but aggressive form of breast cancer that accounts for a disproportionally high fraction of breast cancer related mortality. The aim of this study was to explore the peripheral immune response and the prognostic value of blood-based biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), in a large IBC cohort.Patients & methodsWe retrospectively identified 127 IBC patients and collected lab results from in-hospital medical records. The differential count of leukocytes was determined at the moment of diagnosis, before any therapeutic intervention. A cohort of early stage (n = 108), locally advanced (n = 74) and metastatic breast cancer patients (n = 41) served as a control population.ResultsThe NLR was significantly higher in IBC compared to an early stage breast cancer cohort, but no difference between IBC patients and locally advanced breast cancer patients was noted. In the metastatic setting, there was also no significant difference between IBC and nIBC. However, a high NLR (>4.0) remained a significant predictor of worse outcome in IBC patients (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24–1.00; P = .05) and a lower platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (≤210) correlated with a better disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28–0.93; P = .03).ConclusionPatients with a high NLR (>4.0) have a worse overall prognosis in IBC, while the PLR correlated with relapse free survival (RFS). Since NLR and PLR were not specifically associated with IBC disease, they can be seen as markers of more extensive disease.     

Uptake of bilateral-risk-reducing-mastectomy: Prospective analysis of 7195 women at high-risk of breast cancer

BackgroundBilateral-Risk-Reducing-Mastectomy-(BRRM) is well described in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers. However, little is known about the relative uptake, time trends or factors influencing uptake in those at increased breast cancer risk not known to be carriers. The aim of this study is to assess these factors in both groups.MethodsBRRM uptake was assessed from entry to the Manchester Family History Clinic or from date of personal BRCA1/2 test. Follow up was censored at BRRM, breast cancer diagnosis, death or January 01, 2020. Cumulative incidence and cause specific and competing risk regression analyses were used to assess the significance of factors associated with BRRM.ResultsOf 7195 women at ≥25% lifetime breast cancer risk followed for up to 32 years, 451 (6.2%) underwent pre-symptomatic BRRM. Of those eligible in different risk groups the 20-year uptake of BRRM was 47.7%-(95%CI = 42.4–53.2%) in 479 BRCA1/2 carriers; 9.0% (95%CI = 7.26–11.24%) in 1261 women at ≥40% lifetime risk (non-BRCA), 4.8%-(95%CI = 3.98–5.73%) in 3561 women at 30–39% risk and 2.9%-(95%CI = 2.09–4.09%) in 1783 women at 25–29% lifetime risk. In cause-specific Cox regression analysis death of a sister with breast cancer<50 (OR = 2.4; 95%CI = 1.7–3.4), mother<60 (OR = 1.9; 95%CI = 1.5–2.3), having children (OR = 1.4; 95%CI = 1.1–1.8), breast biopsy (OR = 1.4; 95%CI = 1.0–1.8) were all independently associated with BRRM uptake, while being older at assessment was less likely to be associated with BRRM (>50; OR = 0.26,95%CI = 0.17–0.41). Uptake continued to rise to 20 years from initial risk assessment.ConclusionWe have identified several additional factors that correlate with BRRM uptake and demonstrate continued increases over time. These factors will help to tailor counselling and support for women.     

Neuropathic pain after breast cancer treatment and its impact on sleep quality one year after cancer diagnosis

ObjectivesData regarding the impact of breast cancer treatment-related neuropathic pain (NP) on sleep quality are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to assess the impact of breast cancer treatment-related NP on patients' sleep quality, during the first year after cancer diagnosis.Materials and methodsA total of 501 breast cancer patients were followed prospectively. Incident NP was identified through systematic evaluations after treatments and one year after enrolment. NP severity was quantified using the Brief Pain Inventory severity subscale and sleep quality was evaluated through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), at baseline and after one year. Adjusted regression coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were used to quantify the relation between NP and the variation in the PSQI z-scores.ResultsThe occurrence of NP was associated with a deterioration in sleep quality during the first year of follow-up, more pronounced among those with good sleep quality (PSQI≤5) than those with poor sleep quality at baseline (PSQI>5) (β = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.11 to 0.77 versus β = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.08 to 0.59). These differences were accentuated when only the cases of NP with greater severity were considered (β = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.37 to 1.35 versus β = 0.31, 95%CI: −0.08 to 0.64). Within the PSQI components, daytime dysfunction and sleep duration were the most impaired by NP.ConclusionOur findings highlight the importance of the promotion of sleep hygiene among breast cancer patients diagnosed with NP, especially among those with good sleep quality before treatments.     

Does a dedicated program for young breast cancer patients affect the likelihood of fertility preservation discussion and referral?

PurposeTo assess whether a dedicated program for young breast cancer patients, including a nurse navigator, improves the frequency of: a) fertility discussion documentation and b) fertility preservation (FP) referrals.MethodsA retrospective chart review and prospective survey were undertaken of breast cancer patients diagnosed at age 40 or younger between 2011 and 2013 who received adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy at two academic cancer centers in Toronto, Canada. The Odette Cancer Centre (OCC) has a dedicated program for young breast cancer patients while Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) does not. Patient demographics, tumor pathology, treatment and fertility discussion documentation prior to systemic chemotherapy administration were extracted from patient records. Prospective surveys were administered to the same cohort to corroborate data collected.ResultsEighty-one patient charts were reviewed at both OCC and PM. Forty-seven and 49 at OCC and PM returned surveys for a response rate of 58% and 60% respectively. Chart reviews demonstrated no difference in the frequency of fertility discussion documentation (78% versus 75% for OCC and PM, p = 0.71); however, surveys demonstrated higher rates of recall of fertility discussion at OCC (96% versus 80%, p = 0.02). A greater proportion of women were offered FP referrals at OCC, as observed in chart reviews (56% versus 41%, p = 0.09), and surveys (73% versus 51%, p = 0.04). Time to initiation of chemotherapy did not differ between women who underwent FP and those who did not.ConclusionA dedicated program for young breast cancer patients is associated with a higher frequency of FP referrals without delaying systemic therapy.     

Breast cancer survivorship care during the COVID-19 pandemic within an urban New York Hospital System

PurposeTo examine clinicodemographic determinants associated with breast cancer survivorship follow-up during COVID-19.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, population-based cohort study including early stage (Stage I-II) breast cancer patients who underwent resection between 2006 and 2018 in a New York City hospital system. The primary outcome was oncologic follow-up prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary analyses compared differences in follow-up by COVID-19 case rates stratified by ZIP code.ResultsA total of 2942 patients with early-stage breast cancer were available for analysis. 1588 (54%) of patients had attended follow-up in the year prior to the COVID-19 period but failed to continue to follow-up during the pandemic, either in-person or via telemedicine. 1242 (42%) patients attended a follow-up appointment during the COVID-19 pandemic.Compared with patients who did not present for follow-up during COVID-19, patients who continued their oncologic follow-up during the pandemic were younger (p = 0.049) more likely to have received adjuvant radiation therapy (p = 0.025), and have lower household income (p = 0.031) on multivariate modeling. When patients who live in Bronx, New York, were stratified by ZIP code, there was a modest negative association (r = −0.56) between COVID-19 cases and proportion of patients who continued to follow-up during the COVID-19 period.ConclusionWe observed a dramatic disruption in routine breast cancer follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic. Providers and health systems should emphasize reintegrating patients who missed appointments during COVID-19 back into regular surveillance programs to avoid significant morbidity and mortality from missed breast cancer recurrences.