Effects of slow-release nifedipine on nighttime blood pressure

With the advent of long-acting or slow-release antihypertensive drugs, we should be aware of a fall in nighttime blood pressure (BP) as well as daytime blood pressure. In the present study, casual BPs at the physician's office as well as ambulatory BP was recorded every hour throughout 24 hours with a noninvasive automated BP monitoring device in 24 essential hypertensives treated with slow-release nifedipine. Administration of slow-release nifedipine (20-40 mg, b.i.d.) decreased not only casual BPs but also ambulatory mean BP during the whole day or daytime (6 am to 10 pm). Slow-release nifedipine at 10 mg in the morning did not affect casual BPs at the office. However, mean BP obtained by ambulatory BP monitoring during the daytime was significantly attenuated. In addition, a profound fall in mean BP amounting to more than 20 mmHg during the night in some of the patients was observed during treatment with slow-release nifedipine not only at 20-40 mg (b.i.d.) but also at 10 mg once a day. These results suggest that we have to take into consideration the possibility that long-acting hypotensive agents may cause a great fall in nighttime BP during sleep, especially in the elderly.     

Comparison of labetalol versus enalapril as monotherapy in elderly patients with hypertension: results of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

PURPOSE: This study compared the safety and efficacy of labetalol and enalapril as antihypertensive therapy for elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, parallel controlled trial was conducted. After completing a 4-week placebo phase, 79 elderly (65 years or older) patients with an average standing diastolic blood pressure (BP) 95 mm Hg or above and 114 mm Hg or less were randomized to receive a 12-week course of either labetalol or enalapril in an open-label design. The patients' BP and heart rate were evaluated biweekly by trained observers unaware of the treatment status, and drug dosage was titrated (up to 400 mg twice a day of labetalol or 40 mg daily of enalapril) to achieve a standing diastolic BP of less than 90 mm Hg and a decrease of 10 mm Hg from baseline. Patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at the end of the placebo phase and again after 8 weeks of active treatment. RESULTS: The treatment groups were comparable in their reduction of supine diastolic BP, with no significant differences between the two treatments. Labetalol demonstrated a significantly greater reduction (p less than 0.05) in standing diastolic BP at the end of the titration period compared to enalapril, but this difference was not significant by the end of the study period. Based on 24-hour ABPM readings, labetalol reduced mean 24-hour diastolic BP (p less than 0.05) and mean heart rate (p less than 0.05) more than enalapril. The labetalol-treated patients were significantly less often above their diastolic BP goal throughout the 24-hour ABPM period (p less than 0.01). The two treatments were equally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that labetalol and enalapril are equally effective in lowering supine diastolic BP in the elderly, but labetalol is more effective in lowering ambulatory BP and heart rate throughout the day.     

Effects of long-acting nifedipine on casual office blood pressure measurements, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure profiles, exercise parameters and left ventricular mass and function in black patients with mild to moderate systemic hypertension.

Thirty-nine black patients with mild to moderate hypertension were treated for 1 year with various long-acting preparations of nifedipine, during which time serial changes in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP), exercise performance, left ventricular (LV) mass index and LV systolic function were evaluated. Mean 24-hour ambulatory BP decreased from 156 +/- 15/99 +/- 8 to 125 +/- 10/79 +/- 6 mm Hg at 1 year (p less than 0.0001). LV mass index decreased from 130 +/- 40 to 114 +/- 39 g/m2 at 6 weeks (p less than 0.005) and to 95 +/- 32 at 1 year (p less than 0.0001). There was a significant reduction in septal and posterior wall thickness from 11.0 +/- 2.0 to 9.3 +/- 2.0 mm (p less than 0.0001) and from 10.9 +/- 2.0 to 9.3 +/- 2.0 mm (p less than 0.005), respectively. Cardiac index and fractional shortening changed insignificantly from 2.9 +/- 0.7 to 2.9 +/- 0.6 liters/min/m2, and from 35 +/- 5 to 36 +/- 6%, respectively. At 1 year, using a modified Bruce protocol, exercise time increased from 691 +/- 138 to 845 +/- 183 seconds (p less than 0.05); peak exercise and 1 minute post-effort systolic BP decreased from 240 +/- 26 to 200 +/- 21 mm Hg and from 221 +/- 27 to 169 +/- 32 mm Hg (p less than 0.05), respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Influence of the arterial blood pressure and nonhemodynamic factors on left ventricular hypertrophy in moderate essential hypertension.

In a group of 36 untreated patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (office systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BPs) 160 +/- 3.4 and 102 +/- 1.5 mm Hg, respectively), a 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring and determination of left ventricular (LV) mass index according to the formula of Devereux were performed. After an overnight fast, blood samples were taken for the determination of serum aldosterone, plasma renin activity and serum parathyroid hormone. Urinary catecholamines were sampled for 24 hours. LV mass index (143.7 +/- 8 g/m2) did not correlate significantly either with office systolic or diastolic BP. The correlation of LV mass index with mean 24-hour systolic BP (145 +/- 3 mm Hg) was statistically significant: r = 0.395, p = 0.026. However, the best correlation was obtained with mean 24-hour diastolic BP (90 +/- 3 mm Hg) with r = 0.500 (p = 0.004). Urinary catecholamines were not correlated with LV mass index. LV mass index correlated significantly with plasma renin activity (r = 0.346, p = 0.050), and aldosterone (r = 0.559, p = 0.001). There was a very significant correlation between LV mass index and parathyroid hormone (r = 0.719, p = 0.00001) even after adjustment for mean 24-hour systolic and diastolic BPs. These results clearly demonstrate that ambulatory BP determinants but not office BP parameters are well correlated with LV hypertrophy in essential hypertension. Nonhemodynamic factors are important determinants of LV mass as well. Besides the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, parathyroid hormone appears to play an important role in cardiac hypertrophy.     

Effects of age and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure on rapid left ventricular filling

To determine the associations of age, blood pressure (BP) and cardiac structure with left ventricular (LV) diastolic performance, 47 subjects (21 normotensives and 26 age-matched, previously untreated hypertensives) were studied by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, radionuclide ventriculography and sector-guided M-mode echocardiography. Normotension was defined as an awake ambulatory BP less than 130/80 mm Hg and hypertension as an awake ambulatory BP greater than 135/85 mm Hg. Univariate analyses revealed strong negative correlations of LV filling rate with age (r = -0.67, p less than 0.001), 24-hour systolic or diastolic BP (r = -0.59 for systolic BP and -0.57 for diastolic BP, p less than 0.001 for both) and a modest positive correlation with LV ejection fraction (r = 0.42, p less than 0.05). After multivariate analysis, significant dependencies of both the left atrial index and LV mass index on ambulatory BP were found, which negated the significance of the relation of these 2 cardiac structural variables with LV filling rate. The final regression equation predicted LV filling rate from age, BP and LV ejection fraction. Age was the most important single correlate of LV filling, as evidenced by the 14 of 16 subjects (88%) over the age of 53 years (8 hypertensives, 6 normotensives) who had reduced LV filling rates compared with only 9 of the remaining 31 subjects (29%, all hypertensives) under the age of 53 years with reduced LV filling rates. These data demonstrate that LV filling rate is more dependent upon age and BP than left atrial or LV size.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The irrelevance of the clinical arterial pressure with respect to outpatient pressure in defining the risk of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential arterial hypertension]

To investigate whether the level of clinical blood pressure (BP) may serve to stratify the risk of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in essential hypertension regardless of the level of ambulatory BP, we performed 24-hour noninvasive ambulatory BP monitoring and echocardiography in 115 consecutive hypertensive patients who had never been treated before and in 92 normotensive subjects. Hypertensive patients were grouped according to the difference between the observed clinical BP and the predicted value of clinical BP, defined by regressing the observed clinical BP on the 24-hour average of the ambulatory BP: "low" clinical BP group (clinical systolic BP less than = 10 mmHg, diastolic BP less than = 6 mmHg than predicted values), "high" clinical BP group (systolic greater than = 10 mmHg, diastolic greater than = 6 mmHg than predicted values), "intermediate" clinical BP group (values within the above mentioned limits). Ambulatory BP did not show any statistically significant differences between the three groups. LV mass index was higher in hypertensive patients in each of the three groups (including the "low" clinical BP group) as compared with the normotensive group (all p less than 0.01), but did not show any statistically significant difference among the three groups of hypertensive patients, either defined by systolic BP or by diastolic BP. Other indexes of LV anatomy (relative wall thickness, cross-sectional area) showed a similar pattern.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive heart transplant recipients treated with enalapril, furosemide, and verapamil.

BACKGROUND. This prospective study was designed to examine whether left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy of the denervated transplanted heart may be reversed by medical therapy and, if so, to investigate the time course of this process and its effect on exercise capacity, myocardial function, and cardiac hemodynamics. METHODS AND RESULTS. Ten hypertensive heart transplant recipients with LV hypertrophy were evaluated before therapy with enalapril plus furosemide alone or combined with verapamil, at initial blood pressure (BP) control and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, using 24-hour noninvasive ambulatory BP monitoring, M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography, and supine bicycle ergometry. Average 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP declined from 158 +/- 10 and 104 +/- 7 mm Hg to 129 +/- 9 and 84 +/- 10 mm Hg at initial BP control (p less than 0.005 and p less than 0.025, respectively) and total peripheral resistance from 1,687 +/- 177 to 1,376 +/- 122 dyne.sec.cm-5 (p less than 0.025), remaining normal thereafter. Exercise capacity remained unchanged during the study. LV mass, mass-to-volume ratio, and end-diastolic septal plus posterior wall thickness decreased progressively from 211 +/- 30 g, 2.49 +/- 0.62 g/ml, and 25.7 +/- 2.6 mm to 184 +/- 26 g, 2.22 +/- 0.46 g/ml, and 22.5 +/- 1.9 mm after 3 months (all p less than 0.025) and to 174 +/- 25 g, 2.07 +/- 0.38 g/ml, and 21.5 +/- 1.5 mm after 6 months (all p less than 0.005), remaining unaltered at 9 and 12 months. A correlation was found between the decrease in average 24-hour mean BP and LV mass after 3 months of antihypertensive therapy (r = 0.71, p less than 0.05). Systolic meridional wall stress, LV end-diastolic and stroke volume, ejection fraction, and cardiac output remained unchanged throughout the observation period. CONCLUSIONS. The results indicate that regression of LV hypertrophy is induced by effective antihypertensive therapy in the denervated transplanted heart. The extent of decrease in average 24-hour BP appears to be the main determinant for the extent of reduction in LV mass. LV afterload as characterized by systolic meridional wall stress, LV size and pump function, and physical exercise capacity of the transplant patients are not influenced by the therapeutic regimen chosen in this study.     

Effect of Hypotensive Drugs on the Circadian Blood Pressure Pattern in Essential Hypertension: a Comparative Study

To compare the effect of four drug groups on the ambulatorycircadian blood pressure (BP) pattern, amiloride hydrochlorothiazide,atenolol, nifedipine, and perindopril (5/50 mg/d, 100 mg/d, 40mg/d, and 4 mg/d respectively, for 14 days) were alternated in eachof 20 essential hypertension patients. Diuretics induced the largest (P<0.05) drop in mean 24-hour systolic BP (–12 mmHg, P < 0.001).Atenolol reduced only its standard deviation, and nifedipine reduced onlythe mean daytime systolic BP (P < 0.05). The mean 24-hour diastolic BPwas equally reduced by all drugs except nifedipine, which only reduced (P< 0.05) the mean daytime value. The mean 24-hour heart rate wasdecreased by atenolol (P < 0.001), increased by diuretics (P <0.05), and unchanged with perindopril, while nifedipine increased (P < 0.05) only its night-time value. In conclusion, diuretics were the strongest agents in reducing systolic BP, atenolol the only agent thatreduced variability, perindopril the only agent that did not affect theheart rate, and nifedipine reduced only daytime BP values.     

Effect of Low-Dose Manidipine on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Very Elderly Hypertensives

Summary. To evaluate the effect of manidipine 10 mg on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in very elderly hypertensive patients, 54 patients aged 76–89 years (mean age 81.8 years) with systolic blood pressure (SBP) >160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 mmHg were studied. After a 4-week placebo washout period, patients were randomized to receive manidipine 10 mg or placebo, both administered once daily for 8 weeks. Patients were checked after the initial run-in placebo phase and every 4 weeks thereafter. At each visit casual BP and HR were measured. At the end of the placebo period and after 8 weeks of active treatment, noninvasive 24-hour ambulate blood pressure measurement ABPM was performed. Manidipine significantly lowered casual sitting and standing SBP (P <0.001) and DBP (P <0.001) at the trough level. ABPM showed a significant decrease in 24-hour SBP and DBP values (P < 0,001), daytime SBP and DBP (P <0.001), and night-time SBP (P <0.001) and DBP (P <0.005). In addition, ABPM confirmed a consistent antihypertensive activity throughout the 24-hour dosing interval, without effect on the circadian BP profile. The trough/peak ratio was 0.67 for SBP and 0.59 DBP. No statistically significant change in HR was observed. The treatment was well tolerated, and there were no serious side effects. In conclusion, in very elderly hypertensive patients, once-daily administration of manidipine 10 mg was well tolerated and effective in reducing casual as well ambulatory BP.     

Effects of losartan and benazepril on abnormal circadian blood pressure rhythm and target organ damage in SHRSP

The effects of chronic treatment with losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, and benazepril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, on target-organ damage and abnormal circadian blood pressure (BP) rhythm were compared in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP). Losartan and benazepril were given by intraperitoneal infusion for 3 weeks after 17 weeks of age to minimize any influence of their different pharmacokinetic properties. BP was continuously monitored by telemetrical method before treatment and at the end of the observation period. The left ventricular (LV) weight, 24-hour urinary albumin excretion (UalbV) and morphological changes in the kidney were observed. Losartan and benazepril (1, 3 and 10 mg/day) reduced BP and LV weight in a dose-dependent manner with good correlation between the effects. Losartan significantly improved UalbV in a dose-dependent manner, whereas benazepril was effective at only 10 mg/day. Renal morphological analysis showed that reduction of glomerulosclerosis and collagen fiber thickness was related to the effect on UalbV, but not to the antihypertensive effects. Losartan improved the shifted circadian BP rhythm towards the active phase in a dose-dependent manner, whereas the improvement caused by 1 and 3 mg/day of benazepril was less effective than the same dosage of losartan. These results suggest that both losartan and benazepril can reduce cardiac hypertrophy showing good correlation with their antihypertensive effects, but losartan, especially at a low dose, alleviates renal damage more effectively than benazepril, with its effect correlating well with improvement of the abnormal circadian BP rhythm in SHRSP. Thus, the protective effect against hypertensive target organ damage of the AT1 receptor antagonist seems to be more effective than that of ACE inhibitor.     

Sustained-released verapamil and ambulatory recording of blood pressure in mild to moderate essential hypertension]

An open study in 25 patients evaluated the efficacy and safety of Isoptine S.R., in some cases associated with Aldactazine in mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a placebo period of 2 weeks, the patients received sustained release verapamil (240 mg/24 hours) in a single morning dose for 6 months. An increase in the dosage (360 mg/24 hours in two subdoses) could be made during the first month of treatment if the diastolic blood pressure remained greater than or equal to 95 mmHg. If the diastolic blood pressure persisted at these levels at the second monthly assessment, a tablet of Aldactazine was associated. The blood pressure was evaluated by means of conventional clinical determinations and 24-hour ambulatory recordings carried out at the time of inclusion and then after 3 and 6 months of treatment. From the first month of treatment, the casual blood pressure determinations in the supine and standing position fell highly significantly (p less than 0.0001), resulting in a mean reduction of 22.3 mmHg in the systolic blood pressure (-12.6%) and of 17.4 mmHg in the diastolic blood pressure (-17%). The ambulatory recordings of blood pressure also showed a significant reduction in the mean systolic blood pressure over 24 hours (p less than 0.05 at the 3rd month of treatment), in the mean diastolic blood pressure over 24 hours (p less than 0.01) and the mean pressure (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The impact of one or two missed doses on the duration of action of combined perindopril and indapamide

To evaluate the persistence of the antihypertensive effect of perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg once daily for up to 72 h using the 'missed-dose' technique. Hypertensive patients were initially treated with perindopril 2 mg+indapamide 0.625 mg once daily. After 4 weeks, the 135 of 216 patients who still had a diastolic BP> or =85 mm Hg went on to receive perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg daily for a further 8 weeks. During either week 9 or 11, placebo was substituted for perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg on either one or two consecutive days to simulate BP changes, which might occur after one or two missed doses. A 24-h ambulatory BP recording was performed at baseline, after 9 or 11 weeks of perindopril+indapamide therapy and during the simulated missed doses, 24- 48 and 48-72 h after the administration of perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg. Significant (P<0.001) reductions in mean (+/-s.d.) 24-h ambulatory BP (mm Hg) during the first 24 h after perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg therapy versus baseline were noted for patients later randomized to the one missed dose (-15.9+/-10.5/-9.4+/-7.6) or two missed dose (-17.4+/-8.7/-10.3+/-5.1) sub-groups. A significant reduction in BP (P<0.001 versus baseline) was still present on the days when placebo was substituted for perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg with decreases in mean 24-h ambulatory BP from 24 to 48 h and 48 to 72 h after dosing being -11.9+/-10.1/-6.9+/-6.2 and -10.6+/-9.9/-5.8+/-5.7, respectively. Use of the 'missed-dose' technique has demonstrated a prolonged antihypertensive effect for perindopril 4 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg for up to 72 h, supporting the use of this combination as therapy for hypertension.     

Monitoring 24-hour blood pressure in a drug trial. Evaluation of a noninvasive device

To test the usefulness of noninvasive ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure recording, the Del Mar Avionics system was used in a double-blind clinical trial in which 31 hypertensive patients were randomly allocated to receive placebo or pafenolol (25 mg or 50 mg), a novel, long-acting, highly selective beta-blocker, once daily. The results of 24-hour blood pressure and heart rate recording after 4 weeks of treatment were compared with a previous 24-hour recording performed after a 4-week placebo run-in period using the 3-hour mean of recordings performed every 7.5 minutes both day and night. Furthermore, 24-hour means were analyzed in each patient before and after 4 weeks. The system was easy to use and, judging from two placebo periods in the same patients, the reproducibility was good. The 24-hour blood pressure and heart rate recordings showed a clear dose-response relationship for pafenolol that could not be detected by ordinary casual readings. A daily dose of 25 mg of pafenolol significantly reduced blood pressure during the 9 hours after tablet intake (p less than 0.01), while 50 mg per day of pafenolol resulted in a significant reduction throughout the 24-hour period (p less than 0.01). The same pattern was seen for heart rate, which indicates a greater degree of beta-blockade during treatment with the higher dose. These results indicate that the tested noninvasive equipment is a useful tool for monitoring ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure. It gives important information impossible to obtain from single casual readings. This noninvasive method should be further evaluated to define its place in clinical work and as a research tool.     

EFFECTS OF LOSARTAN AND BENAZEPRILON ABNORMAL CIRCADIAN BLOODPRESSURE RHYTHM AND TARGETORGAN DAMAGE IN SHRSP

The effects of chronic treatment with losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 (AT₁) receptor antagonist, and benazepril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, on target-organ damage and abnormal circadian blood pressure (BP) rhythm were compared in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP). Losartan and benazepril were given by intraperitoneal infusion for 3 weeks after 17 weeks of age to minimize any influence of their different pharmacokinetic properties. BP was continuously monitored by telemetrical method before treatment and at the end of the observation period. The left ventricular (LV) weight, 24-hour urinary albumin excretion (UalbV) and morphological changes in the kidney were observed. Losartan and benazepril (1, 3 and 10?mg/day) reduced BP and LV weight in a dose-dependent manner with good correlation between the effects. Losartan significantly improved UalbV in a dose-dependent manner, whereas benazepril was effective at only 10?mg/day. Renal morphological analysis showed that reduction of glomerulosclerosis and collagen fiber thickness was related to the effect on UalbV, but not to the antihypertensive effects. Losartan improved the shifted circadian BP rhythm towards the active phase in a dose-dependent manner, whereas the improvement caused by 1 and 3?mg/day of benazepril was less effective than the same dosage of losartan. These results suggest that both losartan and benazepril can reduce cardiac hypertrophy showing good correlation with their antihypertensive effects, but losartan, especially at a low dose, alleviates renal damage more effectively than benazepril, with its effect correlating well with improvement of the abnormal circadian BP rhythm in SHRSP. Thus, the protective effect against hypertensive target organ damage of the AT₁ receptor antagonist seems to be more effective than that of ACE inhibitor.     

Comparison of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide for systemic hypertension

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy with associated LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction is frequently found in patients with systemic hypertension, and is multifactorial in origin. Although a reduction in blood pressure (BP) often results in regression of hypertrophy, the pharmacologic profiles of the antihypertensive agents used may determine the probability of such regression despite similar levels of BP reduction. Thiazide diuretic drugs may actually result in increased LV hypertrophy; calcium channel antagonists may cause regression or no change. The effects of treatment with nitrendipine (20 mg/day) or hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg/day) were compared in an 8-week, double-blind study of 18 hypertensive subjects aged 50 years or older. BP was significantly reduced (p less than 0.05) by both nitrendipine (from 161 +/- 29/102 +/- 4 to 145 +/- 24/92 +/- 7 mm Hg; mean +/- standard deviation) and hydrochlorothiazide (from 162 +/- 15/105 +/- 6 to 143 +/- 20/95 +/- 7 mm Hg). Plasma norepinephrine increased in the nitrendipine group, from 202 +/- 110 to 332 +/- 220 pg/ml at 8 weeks of therapy and in the hydrochlorothiazide group, from 147 +/- 130 to 313 +/- 277. Plasma renin activity changed from 3.2 +/- 2.4 to 3.5 +/- 2.1 during nitrendipine treatment, but from 2.1 +/- 2.1 to 10.5 +/- 10.8 ng angiotensin l/ml/90 min (p less than 0.05) during treatment with hydrochlorothiazide. Left ventricular mass index did not change significantly with either therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparative Efficacies of a Calcium Antagonist and an Alpha1 Blocker in Elderly Hypertensive Patients with Stroke

We compared the effects of nilvadipine, a calcium antagonist, and terazosin, an alphal blocker, on the hemodynamics and quality of life (QOL) in 12 elderly hypertensive patients with stroke. Following a washout period of 2 weeks, nilvadipine or terazosin was administered for 2 weeks in a randomized crossover manner. At the end of control and treatment periods, we measured the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and postural change of BP, and interviewed QOL. Terazosin treatment did not show consistent decrease of casual BP, but was associated with a transient decrease of systolic BP and an increase of pulse rate after standing, and enhanced postprandial decrease in BP. Nilvadipine decreased casual BP in a dose-dependent manner, but showed neither postural nor postprandial change of BP. There was no difference in QOL scores with either treatment. Results suggest that nilvadipine is preferable to terazosin for the treatment of elderly hypertensive patients with stroke.     

Relation between extent of left ventricular hypertrophy and occurrence of ventricular tachycardia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

This study was undertaken to determine whether the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) is related to the magnitude and extent of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. Extent of LV hypertrophy was assessed using 2-dimensional echocardiography in 30 patients with HC in whom VT had been documented on 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring, and the extent of LV hypertrophy in these patients was compared with that of a control group of 61 patients with HC who had normal ambulatory ECG recordings. Severe LV hypertrophy, involving at least 3 of the 4 LV segments, occurred significantly more often in patients with documented VT (16 of 30, 53%) than in those with normal ambulatory ECG findings (13 of 61, 21%; p less than 0.002). Conversely, mild LV hypertrophy, involving only 1 LV segment, occurred significantly less often in patients with VT (5 of 30, 17%) than in the control subjects (32 of 61, 52%; p less than 0.001). Moderate LV hypertrophy, involving 2 of the 4 LV segments, occurred about as frequently in patients with VT (9 of 30, 30%) as in patients with normal ambulatory ECG findings (16 of 61, 26%; p greater than 0.05). In addition, the LV wall thickness index, a quantitative measure of overall extent of LV hypertrophy, was also significantly higher (thereby indicating a greater magnitude of hypertrophy) in patients with documented VT (72 +/- 17 mm) than in those with normal ambulatory ECG recordings (61 +/- 14 mm; p less than 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Nurse-recorded and ambulatory blood pressure predicts treatment-induced reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy equally well in hypertension: results from the Swedish irbesartan left ventricular hypertrophy investigation versus atenolol (SILVHIA) study

OBJECTIVE : To compare the relationships of treatment-induced reductions of left ventricular hypertrophy to the changes in clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP). DESIGN : Double-blind and randomized treatment with irbesartan or atenolol for 48 weeks. PATIENTS : Patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (n = 66) with a seated diastolic BP 90-115 mmHg (average of three measurements one minute apart by nurses). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES : Registrations of echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) mass. Clinic and ambulatory BP. RESULTS : In the total material, nurse-measured BP was reduced by 23 +/- 15/16 +/- 7.7 mmHg and 24-h ambulatory BP fell 20 +/- 15/14 +/- 8.5 mmHg by treatment. The correlation between the change in nurse-measured BP and LV mass index (LVMI) induced by treatment was r = 0.35, P = 0.004 for systolic BP and r = 0.26, P = 0.03 for diastolic BP. Corresponding values for 24-h ambulatory BP were r = 0.29, P = 0.02 and r = 0.35, P = 0.004, respectively, with similar correlations for day- and night-time ambulatory BP. The nurse-recorded BP was slightly higher than ambulatory BP (systolic clinic - systolic 24-h ambulatory BP = 5 mmHg). Using 130/80 mmHg as a cut-off value for normal 24-h ambulatory BP, eight subjects had normal diastolic or systolic ambulatory BP, or both. Interestingly, these patients also experienced LVMI regression following treatment (low/normal ABP, -13 +/- 21 g/m2; remaining patients, -18 +/- 22 g/m2, P > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS : In patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, ambulatory BP is not superior to carefully standardized nurse-recorded seated BP in terms of associations with treatment-induced changes in LV mass.     

Ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure monitoring in patients with resistant hypertension

The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of 24-hour blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) monitoring in patients with "resistant" hypertension. 30 patients (44.1 +/- 9.9 years) with diastolic BP 100 mm Hg or more in spite of treatment with three or more antihypertensive drugs were studied. Ambulatory recording of BP and HR was performed by means of Del Mar Avionics monitoring system 9000. Mean recording time was 21.5 hours and mean number of measurements during one recording--56.7. Mean ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP values were significantly lower than mean value of three casual measurements (146.0 +/- 24.6 vs 171.5 +/- 21.2 mm Hg for systolic and 97.2 +/- 11.3 vs 110.4 +/- 7.5 mm Hg for diastolic BP p less than 0.01) In 14 (46.6%) systolic BP and in 10 patients (33.3%) diastolic BP were normal. The patients with normal and abnormal ambulatory BP recordings did not differ in regard to age and mean clinic BP levels. However, patients with abnormal ambulatory BP recordings were more often overweight and showed a greater frequency of left ventricular hypertrophy and family history of hypertension and its complications. The results of the study show that ambulatory BP monitoring may be of value in assessing the response to antihypertensive treatment in patients with so called resistant hypertension as judged on the basis of clinic pressure.     

Effect of nifedipine on total ischemic activity and circadian distribution of myocardial ischemic episodes in angina pectoris

A randomized, double-blind, crossover study was conducted in 10 patients to assess the effect of nifedipine versus placebo on total ischemic activity and circadian distribution of ischemic episodes. After baseline exercise treadmill testing and 48-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic ST-segment monitoring, patients received either nifedipine (mean dose, 80 mg/day) or placebo administered 4 times per day, with the initial dose taken immediately upon arising in the morning. Patients were maintained on a stable dose of each study drug for 7 days, after which they underwent repeat exercise treadmill testing and 48-hour ambulatory electrocardiography. During exercise treadmill testing, greater exercise duration was achieved by patients receiving nifedipine than by those receiving placebo (421 +/- 121 vs 353 +/- 155 seconds, respectively; p less than 0.05). Time to greater than or equal to 1 mm ST depression was significantly greater with nifedipine (282 +/- 146 seconds) than at baseline (130 +/- 72 seconds, p less than 0.003) and with placebo (150 +/- 98 seconds, p less than 0.0005). During ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, nifedipine reduced both the total number of ischemic episodes (18 vs 54 at baseline and 63 with placebo; p less than 0.02 for both) and the total duration of ischemia (260 vs 874 at baseline and 927 minutes with placebo; p less than 0.02 for both). The surge of ischemia between 06:00 and 12:00 noted at baseline and during placebo therapy was nearly abolished during nifedipine treatment. Nifedipine at this dosage, administered in this manner, is effective in reducing total ischemic activity and may prevent morning surges of ischemic episodes.