首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
summary.  Retreatment of relapser patients with chronic hepatitis C with the standard dose of interferon (IFN) of 3 million units (MU) thrice weekly (tiw) plus ribavirin for 24 weeks achieves a sustained response in 30 and 73% of patients with genotype 1 and 2 or 3, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IFN α -2b induction therapy, followed by prolonged treatment with a high dose of IFN α -2b plus ribavirin in relapser patients. A total of 119 patients were randomized to receive IFN α -2b 5 MU daily (Group A: 59 patients) or IFN α -2b 5 MU tiw (Group B: 60 patients) for 4 weeks followed by IFN (5 MU tiw) and ribavirin (1000–1200 mg/day) for 48 weeks in both groups. The primary end point was hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA clearance at week 24 after the end of treatment. A sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 68 and 60% of Group A and B patients, respectively ( P  = 0.37). Logistic regression analysis identified genotype 2 or 3 as the only independent factor associated with response, whereas induction regimen and baseline viraemia levels did not affect the response. The overall SVR was 53 and 72% in patients with genotype 1 or 4 and 2 or 3, respectively. In conclusion, induction IFN therapy does not enhance the SVR to a 48-week combination therapy. Our study suggests that relapsed patients with genotype 1 or 4 may achieve significant response rates of approximately 50%, if retreated with 5 MU tiw IFN plus ribavirin for 48 weeks.  相似文献   

2.
Ribavirin plus interferon-alpha (IFN alpha) combination has led to a marked advance in the treatment of IFN alpha-naive or relapser patients with chronic hepatitis C but was shown to be only marginally effective in IFN alpha-nonresponders. We therefore conducted a pilot study to see whether an intensified treatment protocol might be more effective in inducing a virological response in patients who had not responded virologically to previous IFN alpha monotherapy. 14 nonresponder patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C were included in the study. Patients received 9 MU IFN alpha-2a daily for one week followed by 9 MU IFN alpha every second day for further 5 weeks. With the beginning of the seventh week, patients were treated with 6 MU IFN alpha thrice in week (tiw) for a period of 6 weeks (until week 12). IFN alpha was continued up to 48 weeks at a dose of 3 MU IFN alpha tiw. Ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) and amantadine sulphate (200 mg/day) was given orally for 48 weeks. One patient discontinued therapy after first IFN alpha injection and one other patient after 12 weeks of therapy because of side effects. The remaining 12 patients completed treatment according to the protocol. An initial virological response at week 24 was achieved in 2 of the 14 patients (14%) and both patients remained HCV RNA negative at the end of treatment. However, both patients relapsed 4 weeks after completion of therapy, and therefore none of the patients achieved a virological sustained response. Viral dynamics studies showed a marked decline in hepatitis C viremia during the first 6 weeks of high-dose IFN alpha. After IFN alpha dose reduction, however, viremia stabilized or increased in most patients. These data indicate, that even triple therapy with high-dose IFN alpha plus ribavirin and amantadine fails to improve significantly the response rates in IFN alpha-nonresponders.  相似文献   

3.
4.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C 1- the efficacy and safety of one month interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) induction regimen; 2- the potential virological benefit of a secondary adjunction of ribavirin among HCV RNA negative patients after 20 weeks of IFN therapy, with or without an initial 4-week IFN induction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 151 naive HCV-RNA positive patients presenting with biopsy- proven chronic hepatitis C and elevated ALT were randomised in a 2: 1 ratio in two arms: IFN-alpha 3 MU thrice a week (tiw) for 24 weeks (non-induced patients); IFN-alpha 6 MU daily for two weeks, then 3 MU daily for two weeks then 3 MU tiw for 20 weeks (induced patients). At week 24, HCV-RNA negative patients were randomised to receive in addition or not ribavirin 1-1.2 g daily for 24 additional weeks. Induction efficacy was assessed on the early viral response (EVR) defined as undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 then week 20. Ribavirin efficacy was assessed on the proportion of maintained complete response until the end of follow-up, 24 weeks after discontinuation of treatment. Data were analysed on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Efficacy of IFN-alpha induction: 104 patients were randomised to the non-induction group, 47 to the induction group. Gender, age, genotype distribution and HCV viral load at baseline did not differ significantly between the two groups. There was one treatment discontinuation because of adverse events in induced patients versus four in non-induced patients (P > 0.05). The 4 week EVR was significantly greater in induced patients in patients with HCV genotype 1, 4 or 5 (47% vs 12%, P=0.0002) only. There was no impact of induction in patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3. Efficacy of ribavirin: at week 24, 28 and 26 HCV-RNA negative patients were randomised to addition of ribavirin or not, respectively. Patients randomised to secondary additive ribavirin were more often HCV-RNA negative at the end of follow-up than patients treated with IFN-alpha alone: 18/28 (64%) vs 10/26 (39%); P=0.06. Among patients randomised to bitherapy, the relapse rate was significantly lower in patients with genotype 2 or 3 (0/12 vs 6/13, P=0.01) and not in those with genotype 1, 4 or 5 (5/11 vs 3/6, P=0.99). CONCLUSION: A 4 week IFN-alpha induction significantly increases the EVR rate in patients with HCV genotype 1, 4 or 5. Late secondary adjunction of ribavirin to IFN-alpha for 6 months in HCV-RNA negative patients after 6 months of IFN-alpha significantly decreases the relapse rate in patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3, but not in patients with genotypes 1, 4 or 5.  相似文献   

5.
Summary.  Chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1 infection, liver cirrhosis, high viral load, or those who have not responded to anti-viral treatment in the past have limited chances of clearing the virus, even with pegylated interferon–ribavirin therapy. In this study we treated such patients with a treatment schedule that combines high dose induction Interferon (IFN), prolonged daily IFN and ribavirin treatment. Twenty-four consecutive patients were included in this study with either genotype 1 infection, cirrhosis, previous non-response to IFN or a combination of these poor-response characteristics. Patients were treated with 10 million units (MU) of IFN daily for 4 weeks followed by 5 MU/day until week 24, 3 MU/day until week 52 and 3 MU thrice weekly until week 76 in combination with 1–1.2 g ribavirin daily. HCV RNA levels were assessed weekly until week 4 and at least once every 3 months thereafter, by a validated assay with a detection limit below 500 copies/mL. Both intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis showed a high sustained virological response (ITT 67%, PP 80%). A virological response occurred rapidly (before 8 weeks of treatment) in all patients with a sustained response. Relapse after stopping therapy was observed in only 5%. Side-effects were observed frequently, and six patients had to be hospitalized. With this new treatment regimen that combines induction- and prolonged daily interferon treatment with ribavirin it seems possible to eliminate hepatitis C virus in the majority of patients that have an a priori limited chance of sustained response. Further clinical evaluation of intensive interferon and ribavirin combination therapy (now also including PEG-interferon) is recommended in centres that can provide close patient monitoring and experienced hepatological support.  相似文献   

6.
BACKGROUND: [corrected] Studies on hepatitis C virus kinetics showed that serum levels of interferon fall 48 h after drug administration, when viral load is increasing again. Previously to the availability of pegylated interferon, daily induction therapy with standard interferon was under evaluation. AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of interferon alpha daily induction regimen in combination with ribavirin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized trial including 93 patients with chronic hepatitis C was carried out. On satisfying all eligibility criteria, patients were randomly allocated to two different treatment groups: 44 individuals in treatment arm A: IFN 3 MU thrice weekly + ribavirin 1.0-1.2 g daily for 48 weeks (IFN TIW) and 49 individuals in treatment arm B: IFN 3 MU daily + ribavirin 1.0-1.2 g daily for 12 weeks followed by IFN 3 MU thrice weekly + ribavirin 1.0-1.2 g daily, until completion of 48 weeks of therapy (IFN QD). HCV genotyping was obtained in 85 subjects. A negative HCV-RNA 6 months after cessation of therapy was considered a sustained virological response RESULTS: Eighty three patients completed treatment, five dropped out (one from IFN TIW and four from IFN QD) and in five patients therapy was discontinued due to medical request (two from IFN TIW and three from IFN QD). There was no statistically significant difference between groups with respect to therapy interruption. The frequency of cirrhosis was 29%, similar in both groups. In the "intention to treat" analysis the overall sustained virological response was 39.8%. There was no significant difference in sustained virological response rate between both treatment strategies (36.4% IFN TIW vs 42.9% IFN QD). In the 83 patients who finished the trial, sustained virological response was 44.6%. Among subjects with HCV genotype-1, the sustained virological response was 42% (40.9% IFN TIW vs 42.9% IFN QD) and among patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3, the sustained virological response was 55.6% (50% IFN TIW vs 63.6% IFN QD) CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy had an overall sustained virological response rate of 39.8% ("intention to treat analysis"). There was no difference with respect to sustained virological response rates between patients who used daily induction schedule compared to standard regimen. Adverse events, even more frequent in the daily induction group, did not interfere with the treatment strategies.  相似文献   

7.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Efficacy and safety of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha)/ribavirin retreatment with or without amantadine sulphate were evaluated in non-responders with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: Two hundred twenty five consecutive non-responders to previous antiviral treatment(s) with IFN-alpha alone or in combination with ribavirin or amantadine were treated with IFN-alpha 2b 5 MU daily for 4 weeks, 5 MU tiw for 20 weeks, followed by 3 MU tiw for additional 24 weeks combined with ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/d. One hundred fifteen of 225 patients were randomized to receive amantadine sulphate 100 mg bid for 48 weeks. Treatment was discontinued in patients with detectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA at treatment week 24. RESULTS: An overall sustained virologic response with undectable serum HCV-RNA levels was observed in 49/225 patients (22%). Patients infected with HCV-genotype non-1 (P<0.001), low viremia (P=0.011) and only one previous antiviral treatment (P=0.032) were more likely to respond to antiviral retreatment. There was a trend towards higher sustained virologic response rates in patients receiving triple retreatment compared with those treated with IFN-alpha/ribavirin alone (25 versus 18%, P=0.172). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of amantadine was well tolerated and led to an improvement of sustained virologic responses compared with retreatment with IFN-alpha/ribavirin alone, in particular in patients with low baseline viremia.  相似文献   

8.
Background Efficacy and safety of interferon induction therapy alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine were evaluated in chronic hepatitis C patients who were nonresponders to primary antiviral treatment. Methods The study was designed to have 225 HCV nonresponder patients, but at an interim analysis the response rate difference between groups was lower than expected and the enrollment was stopped when 75 patients had been randomized to receive interferon-α2a (group A, n = 26), interferon-α2a plus 15 mg/kg per day of ribavirin (group B, n = 24), or interferon-α2a plus ribavirin plus 200 mg/day of amantadine hydrochloride (group C, n = 25). Treatment duration was 48 weeks. The dose of interferon was 6 MU/day for 4 weeks followed by 3 MU/day for the remaining 44 weeks. Results On intention-to-treat, the sustained virological response at 24 weeks of follow-up was 11.5% in group A, 12.5% in group B, and 12% in group C. Therapy was discontinued because of adverse effects in three patients in group A (11.5%), three in group B (12.5%), and two in group C (8%). Conclusions Nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C may achieve a sustained virological response rate of approximately 12% if retreated with interferon induction treatment followed by administration of a daily dose. The addition of ribavirin or amantadine did not seem to improve the response rates.  相似文献   

9.
BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) Interferon-alpha (IFN) treatment for 12-18 months is more effective than 6 months in inducing a sustained virological response. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, 88 patients with chronic HCV were enrolled (47 treated with IFN-alpha2b and 41 constituted an untreated control group). Treatment consisted of 5 million units (MU) IFN thrice a week (tiw) for 8 weeks and subsequently 2.5 MU IFN tiw for 16 weeks ('standard treatment'). After week 24 ('long-term treatment'), in virological non-responders treatment was continued using 5 MU IFN tiw for up to week 156, whereas in virological responders IFN was discontinued. In case of a virological relapse, treatment with 5 MU IFN tiw was restarted and continued up to week 156. RESULTS: Sustained virological response rate was 6/47 (13%) after standard treatment and increased to 19/47 (40%) after long-term treatment (McNemar paired test; P = 0.002). Of the 18 patients with a breakthrough or relapse during or after standard treatment, 14 (78%) became sustained virological responders upon long-term treatment. Of the 4 patients who did not have a sustained virological response after long-term treatment, 3 did not receive complete treatment due to side effects and/or non-compliance. In patients who failed to respond to standard treatment, no virological response was observed during long-term treatment. In the control group, no spontaneous clearance of HCV was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term IFN (re)treatment enhanced the virological sustained response rate significantly and was particularly effective in patients with a breakthrough or relapse following standard treatment.  相似文献   

10.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon alpha-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.METHODS: A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon alpha-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon alpha-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).RESULTS: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.  相似文献   

11.
Summary. A randomized trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of daily (QD) or thrice weekly (TIW) administration of interferon- α (IFN) in high doses in combination with ribavirin (1.0–1.2 g/day) in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) who were nonresponders to previous IFN monotherapy. Interferon was administered as 10 MU IFN (QD or TIW) for 4 weeks, followed by 5 MU IFN (QD or TIW) for 20 weeks, and then by 3 MU IFN (QD or TIW) for 24 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated in 142 patients who received at least one dose of medication. One-fourth of the patients achieved SVR, 26% of those treated with IFN QD and 25% of those treated with IFN TIW ( P  = 0.85). For genotype 1 patients, SVR rates were 32.4 and 15.8% for IFN QD and IFN TIW, respectively, whereas for genotype non-1 patients the corresponding SVR rates were 20.6 and 36.4%, respectively (test of homogeneity: P  = 0.031). This finding was further confirmed by multivariate logistic regression analysis where a statistically significant interaction ( P  = 0.012) was found between treatment and HCV genotype indicating that the IFN QD regimen was superior to IFN TIW among genotype 1 patients whereas, among genotype non-1 patients, the two treatments were similar (odds ratio of SVR in IFN QD vs IFN TIW: 3.33 among genotype 1 patients, 95% CI: 1.00–11.14). In conclusion, re-treatment of patients not responding to previous IFN monotherapy with a combination of high daily dose of IFN with ribavirin may be beneficial for genotype 1 infected patients.  相似文献   

12.
Abstract: Background: Combination therapy with interferon alpha (IFNα) plus ribavirin has been shown to improve the sustained response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C but there is little information regarding the lengths of time for this therapeutic regimen. In this study we therefore tried to evaluate whether the analysis of different virological parameters could provide new clues with respect to the early determination of the efficacy of this form of combination therapy. Furthermore, we also examined whether short‐term induction combination therapy followed by IFNα alone is more effective than monotherapy in mounting an initial as well as a sustained virological response. Methods: 185 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C (mean age 42 years (range 19–65 years); 110 males, 75 females) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive, over the first 12 weeks, either interferon alpha 2a 6 million units (MU) three times weekly plus ribavirin 14 mg/kg per day (n=93) or the same dose of IFNα alone (n=92). Patients with a virological response (serum HCV RNA undetectable) after 12 weeks were subsequently treated with 3 MU IFNα alone thrice weekly for a further 40 weeks. Otherwise, treatment was discontinued. After the end of treatment, patients were followed up for 24 weeks. Results: Patient characteristics at baseline were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. An initial virological response at week 12 was seen in 61 (66%) patients receiving IFNα plus ribavirin and in 44 (48%) being treated with IFNα alone (p=0.015) and this improvement in the response rate was mainly restricted to HCV genotype 1‐infected patients (58% vs. 38%). In contrast, end‐of‐treatment (week 52) and sustained virological response rates were similar in both groups (37% vs. 29% and 26% vs. 17% [p=0.1], respectively). Interestingly, patients with HCV genotype 3, however, clearly benefited from short‐term combination therapy. Thus, sustained virological response rates in these patients significantly increased from 25% (IFNα monotherapy) to 59% (combination therapy) (p=0.05). Conclusions: Short‐term combined therapy for 12 weeks is more effective than the monotherapy with respect to the induction of an initial virological response but this effect applies only to genotype 1‐infected patients. However, there is no significant difference between both therapeutic schedules with regard to the induction of sustained response. Although HCV genotype 3‐infected patients seem to benefit from this short‐term combined therapy, prolonged combined therapy may be necessary in HCV genotype 1‐infected patients.  相似文献   

13.
Background/Aims: We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon α-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon α-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.Methods: A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon α-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon α-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).Results: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.Conclusions: In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.  相似文献   

14.
Aims: To compare twice-daily interferon (IFN)-beta administration and once-daily IFN-alpha-2b administration as induction therapy in ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C with a high viral load of genotype-1b hepatitis C virus (HCV). Methods: Sixty-one chronic hepatitis patients with a high viral load of genotype-1b HCV were randomly divided into three groups: group A was given IFN-beta 6 MU induction therapy twice daily for 2 weeks; group B was given IFN-alpha-2b 6 MU induction therapy once daily for 2 weeks; and group C was given no induction therapy. All three groups were then given IFN-alpha-2b 6 MU 3 days/week for the rest of the 24-week study period. Ribavirin was given for the entire 24-week study period. Results: Although the cumulative HCV-RNA negative rates tended to be higher in group A than in group B, the differencewas not significant. The HCV-RNA negative rate at week 2 was significantly higher in groups A and B than in group C (P < 0.05). The sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 16% overall, 21% for groups A and B, and 5% for group C; the SVR rate of groups A plus B tended to be higher than that of group C (P = 0.093). Conclusions: There was no difference between the effects of the two induction therapies; potent induction therapy does achieve higher early viral clearance but not a higher SVR rate.  相似文献   

15.
Aims: We previously reported the potential effect of combination therapy of an initial high‐dose interferon (IFN) and amantadine on the eradication of HCV‐RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The additive effects of amantadine on interferon and ribavirin combination therapy remain controversial. In this study we investigated the efficacy of initial high‐dose IFN with ribavirin and amantadine on the virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C with a high viral load of genotype 1b. Methods: Twenty‐two patients with high viral loads of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients were administered IFN‐beta for four weeks and then IFN‐alpha2b for 22 weeks with daily oral administration of ribavirin and amantadine. Results: A sustained virological response (SVR) was shown in 31.8% (seven of 22 patients). With the naïve patients, the SVR rate was 21.4% (three of 14 patients). In patients who could not eradicate HCV‐RNA by previous IFN monotherapy, the SVR rate was 50% (four of eight patients). Conclusion: Triple therapy with an initial high dose of IFN with ribavirin and amantadine may be effective, especially for chronic hepatitis C IFN‐retreatment patients with a high viral load of genotype 1b.  相似文献   

16.
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA titer and HCV genotype are two major determinants of the outcome of interferon (IFN) monotherapy. To clarify the usefulness of combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin in Japanese hepatitis C patients, we treated patients with a relatively high dose of IFN in combination with ribavirin for 24 weeks and examined the effects in relation to the viral parameters. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-five patients were enrolled in the study. The patients received either 6 or 10 million units (MU) of interferon alpha-2b every day for 2 weeks and then three times a week for 22 weeks with a daily dose of either 600 or 800 mg of ribavirin. The treatment response and safety of this treatment were examined. RESULTS: The sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 26.8% in genotype 1 and 76.5% in genotype 2 (P < 0.001), and 36.1% with the 6 MU group and 45.8% with the 10 MU group (P = 0.09). Multivariate analysis indicated that SVR was associated with genotype 2, HCV RNA <500 kilointernational unit/ml (kIU/ml), and HCV RNA undetectability at week 8 of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our current study showed that a 24-week course of IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy was effective with respect to virologic response in Japanese hepatitis C patients, particularly in patients with HCV genotype 2.  相似文献   

17.
Objectives: To elucidate the efficacy of interferon (IFN)‐beta induction therapy followed by pegylated IFN alpha and ribavirin for chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Methods: Patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1, high titer were enrolled. Twice daily bolus injections of 3 million units IFN‐beta were administered for 14 days. Thereafter, weekly injection of pegylated IFN alpha 2b and daily intake of ribavirin were followed. Therapy duration was adjusted according to the response to the therapy. When time to an undetectable HCV‐RNA was 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, total duration of therapy was 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 weeks, respectively. Patients who failed to achieve an undetectable HCV‐RNA within 12 weeks discontinued therapy on 12 week. Results: Among the 101 patients treated, 56 (55.4%) achieved sustained virological response (SVR). SVR rate for each treatment duration was 10/10 for 12 weeks, 12/14 for 24 weeks, 18/19 for 36 weeks, 15/26 for 48 weeks, 1/4 for 60 weeks and 0/28 for patients who discontinued therapy at 12 weeks. Mean time to an undetectable HCV‐RNA was 35.5 ± 2.7 days. Mean therapy duration was 27.3 ± 1.4 weeks. Using a cut off value of 21.5 fmol/L of HCV core‐antigen in the first week, SVR could be predicted by sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.78. Conclusion: IFN‐beta induction therapy resulted in acceptable SVR rates despite short therapy duration. Steep reduction of HCV by IFN‐beta enables us to predict SVR in the first week of therapy.  相似文献   

18.
Aim:  Nearly 20% of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with genotype 2 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are not curable, even by interferon (IFN)–ribavirin combination therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate the factors that determine the efficacy of combination therapy in patients with genotype 2 HCV infection.
Methods:  Fifty patients with CHC who underwent a treatment of 6 MU IFN α-2b with ribavirin for 24 weeks were retrospectively analyzed.
Results:  All the patients showed no serum HCV-RNA within 12 weeks after starting the therapy. Forty-one of the 50 patients (82%) achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). The age, sex, genotype (2a vs. 2b) and grade/stage of the liver by histopathology and pretreatment viral load werenot different between the sustained responders and relapsers. Univariate analysis showed that an earlier viral clearance from blood and a larger number of amino acid substitutions in the interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR) were predictors of SVR. Multivariate analysis showed that a large number of amino acid substitutions in the ISDR was a predictor of SVR.
Conclusion:  The characterization of the amino acid sequences of ISDR may be helpful for predicting a relapse after combination therapy in patients with genotype 2 HCV infection.  相似文献   

19.
In primary interferon-α (IFN-α) nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C, retreatment with IFN-α has only limited efficacy with sustained response rates below 10%. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to compare the efficacy and safety of IFN-α alone or in combination with amantadine sulphate in nonresponders to previous IFN-α monotherapy. Fifty-five IFN-α nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C (mean age: 46.6 years) received IFN-α 6 MIU thrice weekly for 24 weeks followed by 3 MIU thrice weekly for additional 24 weeks. Amantadine sulphate ( n =26) or a matched placebo ( n =29) was given orally twice daily for 48 weeks. Because of a low initial response rate at week 12 (13/55 patients) and a high breakthrough rate (8/13 patients) after IFN-α dose reduction in week 24, a virological end-of-treatment response with undetectable serum HCV-RNA (< 1000 copies/mL) was achieved in only five patients (IFN-α/amantadine sulphate, one patient; IFN-α/placebo, four patients). After 24 weeks follow-up a sustained virological response was observed in only two patients receiving IFN-α and placebo. Health-related quality-of-life analysis showed a substantial improvement of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) scale concerning the subscales fatigue ( P  < 0.05) and vigor ( P  < 0.05) in patients receiving combined IFN-α/amantadine sulphate treatment compared with those treated with IFN-α alone. IFN-α/amantadine sulphate combination therapy was well tolerated without any serious adverse events. In conclusion, retreatment with IFN-α and amantadine sulphate does not increase the low sustained virological response rates of IFN-α therapy in primary IFN-α nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C, but may lead to a sustained improvement of health-related quality-of-life.  相似文献   

20.
AIM: This study was to investigate the immunomodulatory effects of ribavirin combined with interferon (IFN)-alpha 2b (R+IFN) compared with consensus IFN monotherapy (IFN-Con) in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four adult patients with biopsy-proven CHC, who were infected with HCV genotype 2a or 2b, were studied. A 24-week regimen of IFN-alpha 2b (6MU daily for 2 weeks followed by 6MU tiw for 22 weeks) and ribavirin (600-800mg/day for 24 weeks) was given to 17 patients. The other 17 patients were treated with a 24-week regimen of IFN-Con (18MU daily for 2 weeks followed by 18MU tiw for 22 weeks). Flow cytometric determination of cytoplasmic IFN-gamma and IL-4 expression in peripheral blood CD4+ T cells was performed, and the percentage of IFN-gamma+ and IL-4- (Th1), IFN-gamma- and IL-4+ (Th2) cells were calculated before and 3, 7, 14, and 28 days after the start of therapy. RESULTS: In the R+IFN group, the percentage of Th1 cell peaked on day 3, and then decreased to near baseline by day 14, while the percentage of Th2 cell did not change. In the IFN-Con group, the percentage of Th1 cell peaked on day 14 and the percentage of Th2 cell peaked on day 3, and then decreased to near baseline by day 14. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ribavirin induces an early immune response by peripheral blood CD4+ T cells in CHC patients.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号