Comparative efficacy of eletriptan 40 mg versus sumatriptan 100 mg

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the efficacy advantage of eletriptan 40 mg over sumatriptan 100 mg. Background.-Eletriptan 80 mg has demonstrated significantly greater efficacy when compared to both sumatriptan 50 mg and 100 mg in two studies. Eletriptan 40 mg demonstrated significantly greater efficacy than sumatriptan 100 mg in one previous trial. METHODS: Two thousand one hundred thirteen patients with a diagnosis of migraine according to International Headache Society criteria were randomized using a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design, and treated for a single migraine attack with either eletriptan 40 mg, sumatriptan 100 mg, or placebo. The primary endpoint was 2-hour headache response. Secondary endpoints included headache response rates at 1 hour, pain-free rates, absence of associated symptoms, functional response at 1 and 2 hours, and sustained headache response. RESULTS: Headache response rates at 2 hours postdose were significantly higher for eletriptan 40 mg (67%) than for sumatriptan 100 mg (59%; P <.001) and placebo (26%; P <.0001). Eletriptan 40 mg consistently showed significant (P <.01) efficacy over sumatriptan 100 mg across secondary clinical outcomes, including 1-hour headache response; 2-hour pain-free response; absence of nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia; functional improvement; use of rescue medication; treatment acceptability; and sustained headache response (P <.05). Overall, treatment-related adverse events were low, nausea being the only adverse event with an incidence of 2% or higher (4.9% with eletriptan, 4.2% sumatriptan, 2.8% placebo). CONCLUSION: This trial confirmed that eletriptan 40 mg offers superior efficacy in treating migraine pain and associated symptoms and in restoring patient functioning when compared with sumatriptan 100 mg.     

Tolerability and safety of eletriptan in the treatment of migraine: a comprehensive review

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive review of the tolerability and safety of eletriptan. Background.-Eletriptan is a potent and selective 5-HT1B/1D agonist that has demonstrated significant efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine in doses of 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg. DESIGN: This review reports the tolerability and safety of eletriptan across a broad spectrum of preclinical studies and clinical trials that collectively included treatment of more than 11 000 subjects and more than 74 000 migraine attacks. RESULTS: In clinical trials, eletriptan was well tolerated and safe across its dosing range of 20 mg to 80 mg. The adverse event profile of eletriptan 20 mg was similar to placebo, while the most commonly used dose, eletriptan 40 mg, has an adverse event profile that is only marginally higher than placebo. Eletriptan was safe and well tolerated regardless of age or gender, and for both short- and long-term treatment. Eletriptan is metabolized primarily by the CYP3A4 enzyme. Coadministration of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors was not associated with clinically meaningful change in eletriptan tolerability or safety in the population included in these clinical trials. The margin of cardiovascular safety for eletriptan was also confirmed by a well-controlled clinical study in which intravenous eletriptan in excess of an 80-mg dose was rapidly infused in patients undergoing coronary angiography; nonetheless, it is recommended that eletriptan not be coadministered with a limited list of 7 potent CYP3A4 inhibitors; in addition, the triptan class in general (including eletriptan) is contraindicated in patients with symptoms or findings consistent with ischemic heart disease or other significant underlying cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive review found that eletriptan is safe and well tolerated, and that relatively large changes in dose and plasma concentration result in minimal changes in tolerability.     

Effectiveness of eletriptan in acute migraine: primary care for Excedrin nonresponders

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of eletriptan as a treatment for acute migraine in patients who were poor responders to Excedrin and had not yet been exposed to a triptan. BACKGROUND: Self-medication with over-the-counter drugs, such as Excedrin, is the most common treatment for migraine. Guidelines, however, recommend that triptans be used as first-line treatment of moderate to severe migraine--the severity affecting approximately 80% of migraineurs. Since over-the-counter medications, such as Excedrin, continue to be used in many patients, it is important that clinicians have information on the efficacy of triptans as first-line treatment and on treatment of migraineurs who have shown poor response to over-the-counter medications. METHODS: One hundred ten patients meeting criteria for migraine who were poor responders to Excedrin received open-label treatment with a 40-mg dose of eletriptan for one migraine attack. Efficacy assessments were made at 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours postdose and consisted of headache and pain-free response rates, absence of associated symptoms, and functional response. RESULTS: At 1 hour, the headache response rate was 44%; at 2 hours, 81%. The pain-free response rate at 1 hour was 14% and at 2 hours, 48%. At 2 hours, relief of baseline-associated symptoms ranged from 74% to 80%. Functional response was achieved by 82% of patients by 2 hours, and 68% of patients achieved relief of migraine that was sustained across 24 hours with no need for a second dose of eletriptan or for rescue medication. Eletriptan was well tolerated with adverse events being transient and mild to moderate in intensity. CONCLUSION: Previous studies have established the efficacy of eletriptan as a first-line treatment for migraine. The results of this open-label trial demonstrate that the 40-mg dose of eletriptan had a high degree of efficacy and tolerability among patients who were poor responders to Excedrin.     

Low migraine headache recurrence with naratriptan: clinical parameters related to recurrence

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical parameters that may affect the incidence of headache recurrence or the time to headache recurrence, or both, in migraineurs treated with naratriptan, 2.5-mg tablets. BACKGROUND: The incidence of headache recurrence within 24 hours of treatment with naratriptan, 2.5-mg tablets (17%-28%), is lower than that reported for other currently available selective serotonin agonists. Identifying clinical parameters that influence headache recurrence may further reduce the incidence of headache recurrence or prolong the time to recurrence, or both, for naratriptan-treated patients. METHODS: We examined the effects of three clinical parameters (predose pain severity, headache duration prior to treatment, and relief status 4 hours post dose) on the incidence of and time to headache recurrence across four placebo-controlled naratriptan clinical trials. The impact of these parameters on headache recurrence was examined individually and in combination. RESULTS: Predose pain severity had no effect on the incidence of headache recurrence (overall 23%; moderate 22%, severe 23%). The median time to recurrence was longer for patients with moderate pain before treatment compared with patients with severe pain before treatment (14.5 hours versus 9.3 hours, respectively). Overall time to headache recurrence was 11.8 hours. Patients with headache recurrence reported a longer time until they treated the headache compared with patients without headache recurrence (median, 145 minutes versus 97.5 minutes). Patients who treated headache pain within 3 hours of onset had a lower incidence of headache recurrence (20%) than patients who treated their headache more than 3 hours after onset (28%). Patients with no pain 4 hours post dose had a lower incidence of and a longer time to headache recurrence compared with patients with mild pain 4 hours post dose (17% versus 32%; median, 17.8 hours versus 8.1 hours, respectively). The interaction of all three clinical parameters was significant in predicting headache recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of headache recurrence is low after naratriptan, 2.5 mg, compared with other currently available selective serotonin agonists. Predose pain severity, time to treatment, and 4-hour relief status appear related to the incidence of or time to headache recurrence, or both. Treating less severe migraine attacks, treating earlier within an attack, and obtaining complete relief post dose may enhance the low incidence of headache recurrence and achieve longer times to recurrence with naratriptan, 2.5 mg.     

Comparative efficacy of eletriptan and zolmitriptan in the acute treatment of migraine

Eletriptan 40 mg and 80 mg have shown greater efficacy in acute migraine than oral sumatriptan 100 mg and naratriptan 2.5 mg. This study continues the systematic series of active comparator trials in the eletriptan clinical development programme. In a multicentre double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-groups trial, 1587 outpatients with migraine by IHS criteria were randomised in a 3: 3 : 3: 1 ratio to eletriptan 80 mg, eletriptan 40 mg, zolmitriptan 2.5 mg or placebo. Of these, 1312 treated a single migraine attack and recorded baseline and outcome data to be included in the intention-to-treat population. The primary analysis was between eletriptan 80 mg and zolmitriptan. For the primary efficacy end-point of 2-h headache response, rates were 74% on eletriptan 80 mg, 64% on eletriptan 40 mg, 60% on zolmitriptan (P < 0.0001 vs. eletriptan 80 mg) and 22% on placebo (P < 0.0001 vs. all active treatments). Eletriptan 80 mg was superior to zolmitriptan on all secondary end-points at 1, 2 and 24 h, in most cases with statistical significance. Eletriptan 40 mg had similar efficacy to zolmitriptan 2.5 mg in earlier end-points, and significantly (P < 0.05) lower recurrence rate and need for rescue medication over 24 h. All treatments were well tolerated; 30-42% of patients on active treatments and 40% on placebo reported all-causality adverse events that were mostly mild and transient. On patients' global ratings of treatment, both eletriptan doses scored significantly better than zolmitriptan.     

Efficacy of eletriptan in migraineurs with persistent poor response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs continue to be one of the most widely used therapies for migraine, but their efficacy in treating moderate to severe migraine headache has not been well documented. In contrast, the efficacy of triptans in this group of patients is well documented, although no systematic research is available that evaluates the effectiveness of switching to a triptan in patients who respond poorly to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. METHODS: One hundred thirteen patients who met International Headache Society criteria for migraine and who did not experience satisfactory response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, received open-label treatment with a 40-mg dose of eletriptan for one migraine attack. Efficacy assessments were made at 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours postdose and consisted of headache and pain-free response rates, absence of associated symptoms, and functional response. Global ratings of treatment effectiveness and preference were obtained at 24 hours. RESULTS: The pain-free response rate at 2 hours postdose was 25% and at 4 hours postdose, 55%; the headache response rate at 2 hours was 66% and at 4 hours, 87%. At 2 hours postdose, relief of baseline associated symptoms was achieved by 41% of patients with nausea compared to 82% of patients at 4 hours; for patients with phonophobia, 67% were relieved at 2 hours and 93% at 4 hours, and for patients with photophobia, 70% were relieved at 2 hours and 91% at 4 hours. Functional response was achieved by 70% of patients by 2 hours postdose. The high level of acute response was maintained over 24 hours, with only 24% of patients experiencing a headache recurrence and only 10% using rescue medication. At 24 hours postdose, 74% of patients rated eletriptan as preferable to any previous treatment for migraine. The most frequent reasons cited for this treatment preference were faster headache improvement (83%) and functional response (78%). Overall, eletriptan was well tolerated; most adverse events were transient and mild to moderate in severity. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Results of this open-label trial found the 40-mg dose of eletriptan to have a high degree of efficacy and tolerability among patients who responded poorly to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.     

Rizatriptan efficacy in ICHD-II pure menstrual migraine and menstrually related migraine

Objective.— To examine the efficacy of rizatriptan for the treatment of pure menstrual migraine (PMM). Background.— In 2004, the International Headache Society proposed new research criteria for menstrual migraine (International Classification of Headache Disorders [ICHD‐II]). Two subtypes were defined: PMM, in which attacks occur exclusively with menstruation, and menstrually related migraine (MRM), in which attacks may also occur at other times of the cycle. Methods.— The 2 protocols (MM1 and MM2) were identical randomized, double‐blind studies. Adult patients with ICHD‐II menstrual migraine were assigned to either rizatriptan 10‐mg tablet or placebo (2:1). Patients were to treat a single menstrual migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity. This prospectively planned substudy pooled data from patients with a diagnosis of PMM from both studies. The primary substudy endpoint was 2‐hour pain relief. Efficacy data were summarized for patients with a diagnosis of MRM. Results.— Of 707 (MM1: 357, MM2: 350) patients treated in the study, 146 patients (MM1: 81, MM2: 65) had a diagnosis of PMM. The percentage of patients reporting 2‐hour pain relief was significantly greater for rizatriptan than for placebo for both PMM (73% vs 50%, P = .006) and MRM subgroups (71% vs 52%, P < .001). Most other efficacy endpoints favored rizatriptan compared with placebo in patients with either PMM or MRM. Conclusion.— Rizatriptan 10 mg was superior to placebo for the treatment of PMM, as measured by 2‐hour pain relief. Rizatriptan was also effective for the treatment of MRM and for relief of migraine‐associated symptoms for both headache subtypes.     

Cost considerations of acute migraine treatment

OBJECTIVE: To provide medication price data and cost-reducing strategies for the acute treatment of migraine. METHODS: Retail prices for common acute care medications were found at http://www.drugstore.com. Cost-reduction tactics were obtained from literature searches and clinical experience. RESULTS: Several strategies can reduce cost without sacrificing treatment outcome. In mild to moderate migraine, low-priced nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be used as first-line medications due to their proven efficacy and favorable tolerability. For patients with more severe migraine, implementing a stratified care approach-using migraine-specific medications early in acute treatment-is cost-effective for most patients. Stratified care not only improves outcome and decreases disability, but also reduces cost. Pill splitting and early administration of triptans within an attack enhance their value. Supplying rescue medications, such as opioids, sedatives, and phenothiazines, can prevent emergency department visits. Minimizing multiple dosing of triptans and reducing utilization of expensive health care resources are key factors in reducing the cost of effective migraine treatment. An important affordability factor for patients with co-payments is the number of triptan pills per package. Sumatriptan, naratriptan, and frovatriptan each contain 9 tablets per package, while most other triptan packages contain 6. Current triptan retail prices (per unit) include: Amerge 1 and 2.5 mg, 17.78 dollars; Axert 6.25 and 12.5 mg, 16.31 dollars; Frova 2.5 mg, 13.89 dollars; Imitrex 50 mg, 14.96 dollars; Imitrex 100 mg, 14.41 dollars; Imitrex Nasal Spray 20 mg, 21.61 dollars; Imitrex SQ 6 mg, 50.26 dollars; Maxalt 5 and 10 mg, 15 dollars; Maxalt-MLT 5 and 10 mg, 15 dollars; Relpax 40 mg, 13.58 dollars; Zomig 2.5 mg, 13.67 dollars; Zomig 5 mg, 15.89 dollars; Zomig-ZMT 2.5 mg, 13.67 dollars; and Zomig-ZMT 5 mg, 15.89 dollars. CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners can optimize the use of health care dollars without compromising quality of care through awareness of cost-saving treatment strategies, as well as price variations among medications.     

Naratriptan in the prophylaxis of transformed migraine

We report three patients with transformed migraine, previously refractory to a wide variety of traditional preventive pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. Naratriptan 2.5 mg given each morning, with a second tablet allowed for breakthrough headache, at least 4 hours later, demonstrated a remarkable reduction in frequency and intensity of daily headache. In addition, a subjective improvement in quality of life and restoration of functioning including a decrease in missed workdays was noted. All three patients had previously experienced good responses to sumatriptan or zolmitriptan, but were limited in frequency of use by the authors. The patients were not experiencing rebound phenomena at the onset of treatment with naratriptan. Clinical responses were noted within 3 to 7 days of initiation of treatment. Traditional risk factor analysis and screening were performed. Naratriptan was extremely well tolerated, with no cardiovascular adverse events reported or observed. Possible mechanisms of action are discussed.     

Naratriptan in the preventive treatment of refractory chronic migraine: a review of 27 cases

OBJECTIVE: To review the efficacy of naratriptan as preventive treatment in 27 patients with chronic migraine refractory to other commonly used preventive therapies. BACKGROUND: The treatment of chronic migraine often poses a major challenge to the clinician. Even when given expert care, patients with chronic migraine may continue to have daily or near-daily headaches. METHODS: Clinical records and headache calendars were reviewed of 27 patients fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: (1) aged 18 to 65 years; (2) diagnosis of chronic migraine (formerly transformed migraine), according to the criteria proposed by Silberstein et al; (3) previous failure of at least 4 preventive medications prescribed as part of a management program that included nonpharmacological measures, preventive medication, acute care medication, and detoxification from overused medication; and (4) have used daily naratriptan for no less than 2 consecutive months. The dose of naratriptan prescribed was 2.5 mg twice daily. We considered the following outcomes: (1) frequency of headache, (2) intensity of pain, (3) number of days per month with severe headache, (4) headache index (frequency times intensity), and (5) proportion of patients who reverted to an episodic pattern of pain after 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in the frequency of headache days 2 months (15.3 days versus 24.1 days at baseline, P<.001), 6 months (9.1 days, P<.001), and 1 year (7.3 days, P<.001) after daily treatment with naratriptan was initiated. There was also a statistically significant reduction in the number of days per month of severe pain at 1 month (5.6 days versus 12.5 days at baseline, P<.01), 2 months (5.7 days, P<.01), 6 months (2.8 days, P<.01), and 1 year (2.6 days, P<.01). Similarly, there was a statistically significant reduction in the headache index at 2 months (33 versus 56.4 at baseline, P<.001), 6 months (19.5, P<.001), and 1 year (17.2, P<.001). Of the 20 patients who continued to use naratriptan daily for at least 6 months, 13 (65%) reverted to an episodic pattern of pain (migraine). At 1 year, 11 (55%) still continued to experience episodic headache, 1 (5%) relapsed to chronic migraine, and 2 (10%) were lost to follow-up. No patients had intolerability to naratriptan during the treatment period, and no one stopped treatment due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Naratriptan may have a role in the preventive treatment of intractable chronic migraine. Prospective, controlled studies should be considered.     

Naratriptan in the preventive treatment of refractory transformed migraine: a prospective pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily naratriptan in the preventive treatment of transformed migraine (TM) refractory to previous first line therapies. BACKGROUND: Limited evidence suggests that the triptans can be used in the preventive treatment of refractory headaches. DESIGN/METHODS: We included subjects from 18 to 65 years old, with TM, with or without medication overuse (Silberstein and Lipton, 1996). All participants had previously failed at least two preventive medications. Concomitant, preventive medications were allowed if on a stable dose. After the baseline period, all patients received naratriptan 2.5 mg bid. The treatment phase lasted 3 months. The primary endpoint was change in headache frequency per month. Safety assessment included monthly ECGs, complete ophthalmologic exam, and monthly blood tests. Statistical analyses were performed using the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. We also conducted per-protocol (PP) analyses. RESULTS: Our ITT population consisted of 30 subjects (79% female, mean age of 46.5 years). Mean headache frequency per month at baseline was 27.1 days and a significant reduction of headache frequency was obtained in 1 month (20.4, P < .001), 2 months (18.9, P < .001), and 3 months (19.0, P < .001). HIT scores were 64.3 at baseline, 57.4 after 1 month (P < .001), 55.7 after 2 months (P < .01), and 60 at 3 months (P < .05). The mean number of days using rescue medication was reduced from 17.7 at baseline, to 9.7 at 3 months (P < .001). Our PP population consisted of 22 subjects, and 54% had fewer than 15 headaches per month at the end of the study (converted to an episodic pattern). No serious adverse events were reported. No significant changes were observed in blood pressure or in heart rate. ECGs and ophthalmologic exam were unchanged from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Daily use of naratriptan provided good preventive efficacy in an important subset of subjects with TM refractory to other preventive treatments. (2) The tolerability of this treatment was excellent. (3) Over a short period of time (3 months), no serious adverse events were reported, nor significant changes were found in the ECG or ophthalmologic evaluation.     

Tolerability and efficacy of naratriptan tablets with long-term treatment (6 months)

This open-label study was conducted to examine the long-term tolerability and efficacy of the novel 5HT₁ agonist naratriptan tablets 2.5 mg used to treat all migraine attacks for 6 months. Patients could reduce the dose to 1 mg in the event of intolerable adverse events. The results demonstrate that the majority (median 83%) of attacks treated with naratriptan tablets 2.5 mg were not associated with an adverse event. Among attacks treated with naratriptan tablets 2.5 mg (+optional 2.5 mg for headache recurrence), the most frequently reported adverse event was nausea (4% of attacks after a single naratriptan dose). Both the overall incidence of adverse events and the incidences of specific adverse events were no higher during months 4–6 of treatment compared with months 1–3. Only 5 of 414 patients elected to reduce their naratriptan dose to 1 mg. Headache relief 4 h postdose was reported in a mean of 68% of 6770 moderate or severe migraine attacks treated with naratriptan tablets 2.5 mg. The median number of naratriptan tablets used per attack was 1.0 (mean 1.25); patients treated only a median 7% of attacks (mean 13%) with a 2nd naratriptan tablet for headache recurrence. Patients rated naratriptan tablets as good or excellent in 61% of 7566 treated attacks. In summary, the data from this study demonstrate that naratriptan tablets 2.5 mg were very well tolerated and effective for the acute treatment of migraine for 6 months in a situation closely resembling actual clinical use.     

Tolerability and efficacy of naratriptan tablets in the acute treatment of migraine attacks for 1 year. Naratriptan Long-Term Study Group

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: This open-label study was conducted to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of the 5HT1 agonist naratriptan with repeated use in the acute treatment of migraine attacks for 1 year. Four hundred and seventeen (417) migraine patients treated 15,301 migraine attacks over the course of the study. RESULTS: The results show that 84% of attacks treated with a single 2.5 mg dose of naratriptan were not associated with the occurrence of an adverse event. The percentage of attacks associated with an adverse event did not increase with number of doses used to treat a given attack (1 vs. 2) or duration of use (0-6 months vs. > 6-12 months). The only adverse events experienced in > 2% of attacks throughout the 1-year study were nausea (3% of attacks), hyposalivation (2% of attacks), and drowsiness/sleepiness (2% of attacks). Headache relief 4 h post-dose was reported in a median 70% of moderate or severe attacks and a median 86% of mild attacks treated with naratriptan tablets 2.5 mg. The percentages of patients reporting headache relief did not diminish as a function of increased duration of treatment (0-6 months vs. > 6-12 months) or frequency of use (for > 36 vs. < 36 attacks). The mean number of tablets taken per attack was 1.2. A second naratriptan 2.5 mg tablet was taken for headache recurrence in a mean 16% (median 8%) of attacks. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that naratriptan tablets 2.5 mg taken for acute migraine attacks over a 1-year period are well-tolerated and effective.     

Treatment of migraine in Canada with naratriptan: a cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of naratriptan for the treatment of migraine in Canada. BACKGROUND: The substantial disability brought on by migraine, coupled with the high prevalence of this disorder, leads to substantial costs. Naratriptan is a newly developed triptan shown to be effective in the treatment of migraine. METHODS: Monte Carlo modeling techniques were used to simulate the experience of Canadian migraineurs over the course of 1 year. Data from a multinational study comparing oral naratriptan 2.5 mg to customary therapies were used in the cost-effectiveness analysis. RESULTS: Naratriptan leads to an annual reduction in symptom duration of 225 hours compared to customary therapy not including other triptans. Reductions in lost productivity yield savings of Can $390 (1998 Canadian dollars) relative to customary therapy, which exceed the increase in drug costs resulting in overall savings of Can $109 per year. CONCLUSIONS: The use of naratriptan in the treatment of migraine is an economically attractive option, leading to savings in overall costs. Increases in drug costs seem acceptable in light of reductions in symptom duration.     

Dihydroergotamine nasal spray in the treatment of acute migraine

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dihydroergotamine (DHE) nasal spray in patients suffering from common or classical migraine. METHODS: In a double-blind parallel-group study, 52 outpatients with migraine were randomly allocated to DHE nasal spray or to placebo. Two puffs, one in each nostril, was taken as an initial dose (resulting in either 0.5 or 1 mg of DHE), followed by another puff (0.5 mg) after 30 and 60 minutes, if necessary, achieving a maximum dose of 2 mg for patients of the DHE 1-mg group or of 1.5 mg for patients of the 0.5-mg group. Four consecutive attacks were thus treated. The efficacy analysis was done for observed cases. The main outcome measure was reduction of the severity of the attacks. RESULTS: No differences were observed in the migraine characteristics or the number of treatments of the patients from the different groups. Dihydroergotamine 1 mg tended to provide better relief than 0.5 mg, although the effect was not statistically significant. Patients taking DHE used less rescue medications, with a dose-dependent effect. Side effects were reported by four patients receiving DHE but not placebo. The tolerability of the drug was assessed as good by 94% of the patients. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that DHE nasal spray is well tolerated and has dose-dependent efficacy in migraine.     

Sumatriptan-naproxen migraine efficacy in allodynic patients: early intervention

Objective.— This study evaluated the effectiveness of a single fixed‐dose tablet of sumatriptan 85 mg/naproxen sodium 500 mg (sumatriptan–naproxen) using a very early treatment paradigm in migraine patients whose attacks were historically accompanied by cutaneous allodynia. Background.— Evidence suggests that allodynic migraineurs may demonstrate a better response when treated prior to developing central sensitization, and that these patients are treated more effectively with a compound of sumatriptan and naproxen sodium than either drug alone. This study targeted patients who have accompanying allodynia using a very early treatment paradigm where treatment was initiated while symptoms were still mild. Methods.— This was an open‐label prospective, outpatient study of adult migraineurs who had screened positive for cutaneous allodynia and typically experienced moderate to severe pain preceded by an identifiable mild pain phase. Patients were treated with sumatriptan–naproxen using a very early intervention paradigm in 4 test migraines over 12 weeks where dosage occurred within 30 minutes of symptom onset. Data from diaries and questionnaires were used to evaluate the primary endpoints of sustained pain‐free response at 24 hours post dose (using no second dose of study drug and no other rescue drugs), and overall satisfaction with sumatriptan–naproxen. Results.— Forty allodynic migraineurs enrolled in this study and reported a total of 160 migraines. Of these migraines, 78 (49%) achieved sustained pain‐free at 24 hours and 94 (59%) were reported as pain‐free at 2 hours. The number of patients who rated their Overall Satisfaction following treatment with sumatriptan–naproxen as “Satisfied” (satisfied or very satisfied) was 32 (80%) after the first migraine and 25 (63%) after 3 or more migraines. Conclusions.— In this open‐label study, allodynic patients reported that their migraine attacks responded well and they achieved a high degree of satisfaction following treatment with a fixed‐dose tablet of sumatriptan 85 mg/naproxen sodium 500 mg administered in a very early treatment paradigm.     

Factors associated with triptan use in episodic migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study

Background.— Though triptans are considered the standard of acute therapy for migraine attacks with headache‐related disability, they are used by the minority of potentially eligible persons. Understanding the socio‐demographic and headache features that predict triptan use may help to clarify barriers to optimal treatment. Objective.— To assess the sociodemographic and headache features associated with triptan use in a US population sample of persons with episodic migraine. Methods.— The American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study (AMPP) is a longitudinal study conducted in a representative sample of US headache sufferers. Episodic migraineurs (n = 11,388) who provided treatment data in 2005 were included in the current analyses. We assessed factors associated with triptan use through univariate and multivariate analyses. Multivariate analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic factors, headache‐related disability, cutaneous allodynia, depression, and preventive headache medication use. Results.— Among persons with episodic migraine, 18.31% reported current use of triptans for acute headache treatment. In univariate analyses, triptan use was most common in midlife (ages 30‐59), among females, and was more common in Caucasians than in African Americans. Triptan use increased with headache frequency, headache‐related disability and allodynia, but decreased among persons with depression. In multivariate analyses, female gender, Caucasian race, age 40‐49, higher levels of education (college or higher), annual household income of ≥$40,000, having health insurance, the presence of cutaneous allodynia, greater headache‐related disability, and preventive medication use for migraine were significantly associated with triptan use. Conclusions.— Less than 1 in 5 persons with migraine in the United States who were respondents to this survey used triptans for acute headache treatment over the course of a year. Several markers of severe headache, including disability and allodynia, were associated with increased triptan use. Groups less likely to get triptans included males, African Americans, older adults, and the uninsured. Predictors of use provide insight into groups with unmet treatment needs.