Association between background parenchymal enhancement and tumor response in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PurposeTo analyze the relationships between background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of the contralateral healthy breast and tumor response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in women with breast cancer.Materials and methodsA total of 228 women (mean age, 47.6 years ± 10 [SD]; range: 24–74 years) with invasive breast cancer who underwent NAC were included. All patients underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after NAC and 127 patients underwent MRI before, during (after the 4th cycle of NAC) and after NAC. Quantitative semi-automated analysis of BPE of the contralateral healthy breast was performed. Enhancement level on baseline MRI (baseline BPE) and MRI after chemotherapy (final BPE), change in enhancement rate between baseline MRI and final MRI (total BPE change) and between baseline MRI and midline MRI (early BPE change) were recorded. Associations between BPE and tumor response, menopausal status, tumor phenotype, NAC type and tumor stage at diagnosis were searched for. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer cells in the breast and ipsilateral lymph nodes.ResultsNo differences were found in baseline BPE, final BPE, early and total BPE changes between pCR and non-pCR groups. Early BPE change was higher in non-pCR group in patients with stages 3 and 4 breast cancers (P = 0.019) and in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients (P = 0.020).ConclusionEarly reduction of BPE in the contralateral breast during NAC may be an early predictor of loss of tumor response, showing potential as an imaging biomarker of treatment response, especially in women with stages 3 or 4 breast cancers and in HER2 – negative breast cancers.     

Prophylactic breast irradiation reduces background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on MRI: A secondary analysis

PurposeWe recently showed that prophylactic breast irradiation (PBI) reduces the risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers undergoing treatment for early breast cancer. It has been suggested that Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE) may be a biomarker for increased risk of breast cancer.MethodsFor participants in the trial we reviewed the MRI prior to enrollment and following radiation treatment and scored the contralateral breast for BPE and density.ResultsSignificant reduction of BPE was more commonly noted following PBI (p = 0.011) compared to the control group.ConclusionReduction of BPE by PBI may contribute to its prophylactic effect.     

Association between contralateral background parenchymal enhancement on MRI and outcome in patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate whether background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of the contralateral breast on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).Materials and methodsA total of 228 women (47.6 years ± 10 [SD]; range: 24–74 years) with invasive breast cancer who underwent NAC between 2005 and 2013 were included. All included patients underwent breast MRI before and after NAC. Quantitative semiautomated analysis of BPE of the contralateral healthy breast was performed. The enhancement level on baseline MRI (baseline BPE) and on MRI after chemotherapy (final BPE) and the change in enhancement rate between baseline MRI and final MRI were recorded. Cox regression was used to test associations between BPE variables, patient and tumor characteristics, overall survival (OS) and disease–free survival (DFS). Subgroup analyses based on menopausal status and immunohistochemical subtypes were performed.ResultsMedian follow-up was 92 months. Multivariable analysis revealed that Ki-67 level (P = 0.026) and receipt of mastectomy (P = 0.015) were independent variables associated with OS while Ki-67 level (P = 0.010) and post-NAC pathological node categorization (P = 0.027) were independent variables associated with DFS. BPE was not associated with OS (P = 0.500, 0.546 and 0.712 for baseline BPE, final BPE and BPE change, respectively) or with DFS (P = 0.568, 0.412 and 0.327, respectively).ConclusionBPE of the contralateral breast on MRI may have limited prognostic value in patients with breast cancer treated with NAC.     

Impact of Tamoxifen on Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue,Background Parenchymal Enhancement,and Cysts on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of tamoxifen treatment on amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT), background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and cysts on breast MRI. Retrospective search identified 96 women with breast cancer who had a breast MRI both before and during adjuvant tamoxifen therapy between 2002 and 2008. After exclusion of all irradiated breasts, 88 women were eligible. Two readers blinded to tamoxifen treatment status independently rated level of BPE, amount of FGT, and cysts using a 4‐point categorical scale: BPE––Minimal, Mild, Moderate, Marked; FGT––Fatty, Scattered, Heterogeneously Dense (HD), Dense; Cysts––Minimal, Mild, Moderate, Marked. A consensus interpretation was reached in cases of disagreement. During tamoxifen, there was a significant shift from higher to lower degree BPE, cysts, and FGT compared with before tamoxifen. BPE, cysts and FGT decreased in 68% (60/88), 38% (33/88), and 40% (35/88) of women during tamoxifen (p < 0.001 for all measures). After the exclusion of all cases with minimal BPE, cysts, or FGT on the pre‐tamoxifen MRI, the percentage of women demonstrating a decrease in these factors increased to 81% (60/74), 77% (33/43), and 41% (35/86), respectively. Exclusion of patients treated with chemotherapy did not substantially change these results. The percentage of women with decreases in FGT and cysts increased with greater duration on tamoxifen, whereas decreases in BPE were detected early in treatment (<90 days) and did not change substantially with longer duration on tamoxifen. A significant association exists between treatment with tamoxifen and decreases in BPE, cysts, and FGT on breast MRI.     

Factors associated with breast MRI use among women with a family history of breast cancer

Although annual breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for women at high risk for breast cancer as an adjunct to screening mammography, breast MRI use remains low. We examined factors associated with breast MRI use in a cohort of women with a family history of breast cancer but no personal cancer history. Study participants came from the Sister Study cohort, a nationwide, prospective study of women with at least 1 sister who had been diagnosed with breast cancer but who themselves had not ever had breast cancer (n = 17 894). Participants were surveyed on breast cancer beliefs, cancer worry, breast MRI use, provider communication, and genetic counseling and testing. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with having a breast MRI overall and for those at high risk. Breast MRI was reported by 16.1% and was more common among younger women and those with higher incomes. After adjustment for demographics, ever use of breast MRI was associated with actual and perceived risk. Odds ratios (OR) were 12.29 (95% CI, 8.85‐17.06), 2.48 (95% CI, 2.27‐2.71), and 2.50 (95% CI, 2.09‐2.99) for positive BRCA1/2 test, lifetime breast cancer risk ≥ 20%, and being told by a health care provider of higher risk, respectively. Women who believed they had much higher risk than others or had higher level of worry were twice as likely to have had breast MRI; OR = 2.23 (95% CI, 1.82‐2.75) and OR = 1.76 (95% CI, 1.52‐2.04). Patterns were similar among women at high risk. Breast cancer risk, provider communication, and personal beliefs were determinants of breast MRI use. To support shared decisions about the use of breast MRI, women could benefit from improved understanding of the chances of getting breast cancer and increased quality of provider communications.     

In Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer,Screening MRI of the Contralateral Breast Detects Mammographically Occult Cancer,Even in Elderly Women: The Mayo Clinic in Florida Experience

Abstract: The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer is somewhat controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of synchronous, occult contralateral breast cancer detected by MRI but not by mammography or clinical breast examination in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, including those aged 70 years or older at our institution. MRI results for women with newly diagnosed breast cancer who underwent bilateral breast MRI after negative mammography and clinical examination between February 2003 and November 2007 at Mayo Clinic in Florida were reviewed. The prevalence of pathologically confirmed contralateral carcinoma diagnosed solely by MRI was determined and analyzed in the context of age, family history, menopausal status, breast density, and primary‐tumor characteristics. Logistic regression was used to explore the association between contralateral carcinoma and potential patient risk factors. A total of 425 women were evaluated, of whom 129 (30%) were aged 70 years or older. A contralateral biopsy was recommended and performed solely on the basis of MRI in 72 of the 425 women (17%). Sixteen of these 72 women (22%) had pathologically confirmed carcinoma, including seven in the older subgroup. The prevalence of clinically and mammographically occult contralateral carcinoma detected by MRI was 3.8% (16/425) overall and 5.4% (7/129) in the group of older women. When potential risk factors for contralateral breast cancer were evaluated, postmenopausal status was the only significant predictor of contralateral cancer detected by MRI (p = 0.016). We concluded that contralateral breast screening with MRI should be considered in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, even those aged 70 years or older at diagnosis.     

Women's acceptance of MRI in breast cancer surveillance because of a familial or genetic predisposition

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breasts is a promising screening modality for early detection in women at increased breast cancer risk. We investigated the subjective experiences with MRI and the preferences for MRI, mammography or clinical breast examination in 178 high-risk women adhering to a breast cancer surveillance programme. MRI was reported to cause limited discomfort. About 44% preferred MRI as a screening test (mammography: 14%). MRI provided the most reassurance of breast cancer being absent in case of a favourable test result. MRI seems to be acceptable as a screening test for women at increased breast cancer risk and is preferred by them over mammography.     

Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is highly sensitive for cancer. However, MRI frequently detects additional lesions that mandate further evaluation. The intent of this study was to assess the ability of targeted ultrasound to identify additional lesions detected on MRI in patients undergoing evaluation for breast cancer. METHODS: Between January 1, 1999, and July 15, 2004, 270 women underwent breast MRI at Grant Medical Center. MRI was obtained in 191 women during evaluation for documented or suspected breast cancer. Fifty-two patients had additional suspicious lesions on MRI, prompting targeted ultrasound; these patients constituted our study population. RESULTS: Seventy-five additional suspicious lesions were detected on breast MRI in 52 women. Two women underwent mastectomy without targeted ultrasound. Targeted ultrasound identified 65 of the remaining 73 lesions (89%). Eight lesions (11%) were not visible on targeted ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Targeted ultrasound can be a reliable method to correlate MRI abnormalities in breast cancer patients.     

The Role of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment and Surgical Treatment of Interval and Screen‐Detected Breast Cancer in Older Women

We describe the relationship between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the utilization of additional imaging, biopsy, and primary surgical treatment for subgroups of women with interval versus screen‐detected breast cancer. We determined the proportion of women receiving additional breast imaging or biopsy and type of primary surgical treatment, stratified by use of preoperative MRI, separately for both groups. Using Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) data, we identified a cohort of women age 66 and older with an interval or screen‐detected breast cancer diagnosis between 2005 and 2010. Using logistic regression, we explored associations between primary surgical treatment type and preoperative MRI use for interval and screen‐detected cancers. There were 204 women with an interval cancer and 1,254 with a screen‐detected cancer. The interval cancer group was more likely to receive preoperative MRI (21% versus 13%). In both groups, women receiving MRI were more likely to receive additional imaging and/or biopsy. Receipt of MRI was not associated with increased odds of mastectomy (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.67–1.50), while interval cancer diagnosis was associated with significantly higher odds of mastectomy (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.11–2.42). Older women with interval cancer were more likely than women with a screen‐detected cancer to have preoperative MRI, however, those with an interval cancer had 64% higher odds of mastectomy regardless of receipt of MRI. Given women with interval cancer are reported to have a worse prognosis, more research is needed to understand effectiveness of imaging modalities and treatment consequences within this group.     

Appraisal Era for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Aims: To determine the impact of preoperative use of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in therapeutic surgical approach in women with breast cancer.

Materials and Methods: Preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast was performed in 105 patients with suspected breast carcinomas. MRI findings were correlated with mammography (MMG) and ultrasonography (US). Results: Histopathologic analysis revealed 144 breast carcinomas. The results of the MRI lead to a change in 17.1% of the planned surgical procedure. MRI imaging alone revealed 16 multifocal or multicentric tumors and four contralateral carcinomas.

Conclusion: Breast MRI could be recommended as a pre-surgical diagnostic procedure in patients allocated to breast conservation surgery. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to determine if preoperative breast MRI leads to a decrease in tumor recurrence and in overall survival.     

Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women

BACKGROUND: Screening mammography has led to earlier diagnosis of breast cancer; however, the increased tissue density of young women can complicate mammographic interpretation. We hypothesized that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has value in detection of mammographically occult breast cancers, particularly in premenopausal women for whom the sensitivity of mammography is compromised. METHODS: Data were available for 89 women with biopsy-proven breast cancer who had undergone both mammography and breast MRI. Variables evaluated included menopausal status and radiographic findings. Data were analyzed using Fisher's Exact test; P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 89 women in our study, 69 were perimenopausal or postmenopausal and 20 were premenopausal at the time of diagnosis. The malignant lesion was identified on mammography and MRI for a majority of patients. One third of premenopausal women had negative mammography but positive MRI findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a role for breast MRI in supplementing conventional mammography for early detection of breast cancer in premenopausal women.     

Detected, yet not Diagnosed - Breast Cancer Screening with MRI Mammography in High-Risk Women

BACKGROUND: MRI has been demonstrated to be the most sensitive imaging method for detecting breast cancer in women at high risk, allowing depiction of cancers that are occult on mammography, ultrasound and clinical breast examination. This high sensitivity is tempered by imperfect specificity due to overlap in the features of benign and malignant lesions. CASE: We present the case of a young BRCA2 mutation carrier whose breast cancer could have been diagnosed 2 years earlier; this is a rare case of a false-negative finding in MRI. DISCUSSION: We discuss morphological, physiological and psychological reasons for underestimation of MRI sets, especially in young women. CONCLUSION: We conclude that double reading in MR screening for breast cancer in high-risk women, as conducted for mammography screening, could be considered.     

Screening Magnetic Resonance Imaging Recommendations and Outcomes in Patients at High Risk for Breast Cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening recommendations and the subsequent outcomes in women with increased risk for breast cancer evaluated by oncology subspecialists at an academic center. Patients evaluated between 1/1/2007 and 3/1/2011 under diagnosis codes for family history of breast or ovarian cancer, genetic syndromes, lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical hyperplasia were included. Patients with a history of breast cancer were excluded. Retrospective review of prospectively acquired demographics, lifetime risk of breast cancer, and screening recommendations were obtained from the medical record. Retrospective review of the results of prospectively interpreted breast imaging examinations and image‐guided biopsies were analyzed. 282 women were included. The majority of patients were premenopausal with a median age of 43. Most (69%) were referred due to a family history of breast or ovarian cancers. MRI was recommended for 84% of patients based on a documented lifetime risk >20%. Most women referred for MRI screening (88%) were compliant with this recommendation. A total of 299 breast MRI examinations were performed in 146 patients. Biopsy was performed for 32 (11%) exams and 10 cancers were detected for a positive predictive value (PPV) of 31% (based on biopsy performed) and an overall per exam cancer yield of 3.3%. Three cancers were detected in patients who did not undergo screening MRI. The 13 cancers were Stage 0–II; all patients were without evidence of disease with a median follow‐up of 22 months. In a cohort of women seen by breast subspecialty providers, screening breast MRI was recommended according to guidelines, and used primarily in premenopausal women with a family history or genetic predisposition to breast cancer. Adherence to MRI screening recommendations was high and cancer yield from breast MRI was similar to that in clinical trials.     

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Facilitates Breast Conservation for Occult Breast Cancer

Introduction: Occult primary breast cancer, i.e., isolated axillary adenocarcinoma without detectable tumor in the breast by either physical exam or mammography, represents up to 1% of operable breast cancer. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is generally the accepted treatment for this condition although tumor is identified in only two-thirds of mastectomy specimens. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can identify occult breast carcinoma and may direct therapy. This study examined the ability of breast MRI to detect occult breast cancer and to facilitate breast conservation therapy.Methods: Forty women with biopsy-proven metastatic adenocarcinoma to an axillary lymph node and no evidence of primary cancer were studied. All patients had a physical examination, mammography, and MRI of the breast. Using a dedicated breast coil, MRI imaging was performed with and without gadolinium enhancement. Positive MRI scans were compared with histopathologic findings at the time of operation (n 5 21).Results: MRI identified the primary breast lesion in 28 of 40 women (70%). Of these 28 patients, 11 had MRM, 11 had lumpectomy/axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)/radiotherapy (XRT), 2 had ALND/XRT alone, and 4 had no local treatment secondary to stage IV disease. Two women initially treated with lumpectomy/ALND subsequently had mastectomy for positive margins. Of the women with positive MRI who had breast surgery, 21 of 22 (95%) had tumor within the surgical specimen. Twelve women had negative MRI of the breast. Five of these 12 underwent MRM, of whom 4 had no tumor in the mastectomy specimen. The remaining 7 patients had ALND and whole breast radiation (ALND/XRT) (n 5 5), or were observed (n 5 2). Overall, 18 of 34 women surgically treated had MRM, while 16 (47%) preserved their breast. Tumor yield for patients having breast surgery was 81%.Conclusions: MRI of the breast can identify occult breast cancer in many patients and may facilitate breast conservation in select women. Negative breast MRI predicts low tumor yield at mastectomy.     

Biomarkers Predictive of Short-Interval Breast Cancer Development in High-Risk Women

Abstract: Biomarkers highly predictive of short-term risk of breast cancer are needed to identify women most likely to benefit from prophylactic measures or chemopreventive agents. We have utilized random fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of breast ductal tissue because FNA is minimally traumatic, allowing aspiration to easily be repeated at follow-up intervals of months to years. We performed breast FNA on 213 women at high risk and 30 women at low risk for breast cancer. High-risk women were those with a first-degree relative with breast cancer, prior breast biopsy indicating atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma in situ, a history of prior breast cancer, or some multiple of these factors. Aspirates were analyzed for cytologic changes and biomarker abnormalities of DNA aneu-ploidy and overexpression of estrogen receptor (ER), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), p53 , and HER-2Ineu.
Cytologic evidence of hyperplasia with or without atypia as well as individual or multiple biomarker abnormalities were more frequent in the high-risk than the low-risk group. At a median follow-up of 32 months, five women have been diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (2) or invasive cancer (3). By multivariate analysis, development of cancer, detection of cancer, or both was primarily predicted by atypical hyperplasia and secondarily by Gail risk at 10 years, menopausal status, and p53 overexpression. The combination of atypical hyperplasia and multiple biomarker abnormalities (restricted to the three-marker set of ploidy, p53 , and EGFR) was observed in four of the five cases of cancer. Cytology and biomarker expression in cells obtained from random FNA sampling of breast tissue are being explored as risk predictors as well as surrogate response biomarkers for phase II cancer chemoprevention trials.     

Breast-specific gamma imaging with 99mTc-Sestamibi and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer--a comparative study

The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) using a high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with indeterminate breast findings. Twenty-three women with an indeterminate breast finding that required BSGI and MRI as deemed necessary by the interpreting radiologist or referring physician were included. MRI was performed on a GE 1.5T scanner and BSGI was performed on a Dilon high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera. All imaging findings were correlated with pathologic diagnosis. Thirty-three indeterminate lesions were evaluated in the study. There were a total of nine pathologically confirmed cancers. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity of cancer detection between BSGI and MRI. BSGI demonstrated a greater specificity than MRI, 71% and 25%, respectively. BSGI has equal sensitivity and greater specificity than MRI for the detection of breast cancer.     

Factors Associated with Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use among Medicare Beneficiaries with Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer

Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use among Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer has substantially increased from 2005 to 2009. We sought to identify factors associated with preoperative breast MRI use among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or stage I–III invasive breast cancer (IBC). Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare data from 2005 to 2009 we identified women ages 66 and older with DCIS or stage I–III IBC who underwent breast‐conserving surgery or mastectomy. We compared preoperative breast MRI use by patient, tumor and hospital characteristics stratified by DCIS and IBC using multivariable logistic regression. From 2005 to 2009, preoperative breast MRI use increased from 5.9% to 22.4% of women diagnosed with DCIS and 7.0% to 24.3% of women diagnosed with IBC. Preoperative breast MRI use was more common among women who were younger, married, lived in higher median income zip codes and had no comorbidities. Among women with IBC, those with lobular disease, smaller tumors (<1 cm) and those with estrogen receptor negative tumors were more likely to receive preoperative breast MRI. Women with DCIS were more likely to receive preoperative MRI if tumors were larger (>2 cm). The likelihood of receiving preoperative breast MRI is similar for women diagnosed with DCIS and IBC. Use of MRI is more common in women with IBC for tumors that are lobular and smaller while for DCIS MRI is used for evaluation of larger lesions.     

Management of women at high risk for breast cancer: new imaging beyond mammography

The management of women with an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer is a difficult task. This is especially true for women with a documented mutation in a breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA), and also for those who tested negative for a mutation, but have a family history that is suggestive of familial breast cancer. Primary prevention by prophylactic mastectomy has been shown to reduce breast cancer incidence in these women, but this intervention is still not considered a "first-line" option in the majority of guidelines. Instead, secondary prevention (intensified surveillance) is recommended. However, due to the early onset of familial breast cancer, screening must start at a substantially younger age than in women at average risk. This, together with the fact that familial breast cancers may differ from sporadic cancers in many aspects, will have a significant impact on the design and on the success rates of surveillance protocols. This article describes the different management options that exist for women at increased genetic risk and provides a survey of the current evidence regarding mammographic and non-mammographic imaging techniques. The conclusion is that mammographic screening, with or without concomitant ultrasound and clinical breast examination, is probably not sufficient to ensure an early diagnosis of familial breast cancer. If MRI is integrated in surveillance programs, early diagnosis seems to be possible. Still, the efficacy of screening even with MRI is unclear in terms of morbidity and mortality, and this lack of evidence must be communicated to women at high genetic risk.     

Variability of Preoperative Breast MRI Utilization among Older Women with Newly Diagnosed Early‐stage Breast Cancer

While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used following breast cancer diagnosis, routine use of breast MRI for preoperative evaluation remains contentious. We identified factors associated with preoperative breast MRI utilization and investigated the variation among physicians. We used the surveillance, epidemiology, and end Results (SEER)‐Medicare linked database to analyze the preoperative breast MRI utilization among patients with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer diagnosed between 2002 and 2007. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to identify patient‐ and physician‐level predictors of preoperative MRI utilization. Of 56,743 women with early‐stage breast cancer who were treated with surgery and evaluated by a preoperative mammogram and/or ultrasound during the study period, 8.7% (n = 4,913) received preoperative breast MRI. While patient and tumor characteristics did predict preoperative breast MRI utilization, they explained only 15.4% of the variation in utilization rates. Differences in preoperative breast MRI utilization across physicians were large, after controlling patient‐level factors and physicians' volumes. Accounting for clustering of patients within individual physicians (n = 3,144), the multilevel logistic regression models explained 36.4% of variation. The median odds ratio of 3.2, corresponding with the median value of the relative odds of receiving preoperative breast MRI between two randomly chosen physicians, indicated a large individual physician effect. Our study found that preoperative breast MRI has been adopted rapidly and variably. Although patient characteristics were associated with preoperative breast MRI utilization, physician practice was a major determinant of whether women received preoperative breast MRI. Future studies should evaluate whether routine use of preoperative breast MRI in newly diagnosed early‐stage breast cancer improves clinical outcomes.     

Practicalities of developing a breast magnetic resonance imaging screening service for women at high risk for breast cancer

Background: Demand for screening breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women with a hereditary predisposition to breast cancer has increased since the introduction of a medicare item number. To aid future service planning, we examined the practicalities of establishing and running a breast MRI screening programme for high risk women and to describe the early outcomes of our screening programme. Methods: We undertook a retrospective audit of prospectively collected data. Women <50 years of age with an inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation were invited to undergo annual breast screening with MRI in addition to mammography and clinical breast examination. We assessed process times for booking, performing and reporting MRIs; MRI findings and ease of interpretation; patient recall rate; MRI cancer detection rate; and patient satisfaction via questionnaire. Results: From 2006 to 2009, 82 women completed a round one screening MRI and 45, 21 and one women completed second, third and fourth round annual MRI studies, respectively. Median MRI process times were: booking 20 min; attendance in radiology department 90 min; imaging duration 45 min; reporting by one radiologist 30 min. Of the 82 round one studies, 23 (28%) were reported as ≥Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System three requiring further investigation. Of the round two and three studies completed, 13/45 (28%) and 2/21 (9%) have been recalled, respectively. Seven malignancies were detected. Questionnaires revealed women were satisfied with the service. Conclusions: Significant time, staff and equipment is required to run an effective breast MRI screening programme and this must be considered by future service providers.