Comparison of three different methods to confirm tracheal tube placement in emergency intubation

OBJECTIVES: Verification of endotracheal tube placement is of vital importance, since unrecognized esophageal intubation can be rapidly fatal (death, brain damage).The aim of our study was to compare three different methods for immediate confirmation of tube placement: auscultation, capnometry and capnography in emergency conditions in the prehospital setting. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study in the prehospital setting. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: All adult patients (>18 years) were intubated by an emergency physician in the field. Tube position was initially evaluated by auscultation. Then, capnometry was performed with infrared capnometry and capnography with infrared capnography. The examiners looked for the characteristic CO(2) waveform and value of end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO(2)) in millimeters of mercury. Determination of final tube placement was performed by a second direct visualization with laryngoscope. Data are mean +/- SD and percentages. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Over a 4year period, 345 patients requiring emergency intubation were included. Indications for intubation included cardiac arrest ( n=246; 71%) and non-arrest conditions ( n=99; 29%). In nine (2.7%) patients, esophageal tube placement occurred. The esophageal intubations were followed by successful endotracheal intubations without complications. The capnometry (sensitivity and specificity 100%) and capnography (sensitivity and specificity 100%) were better than auscultation (sensitivity 94% and specificity 83%) in confirming endotracheal tube placement in non-arrest patients ( p<0.05). Capnometry was highly specific (100%) but not sensitive (88%) for correct endotracheal intubation in patients with cardiopulmonary arrest (capnometry versus auscultation and capnometry versus capnography, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Capnography is the most reliable method to confirm endotracheal tube placement in emergency conditions in the prehospital setting.     

Tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) for confirming endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and timeliness of using tracheal ultrasound to examine endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational study, conducted at the emergency department of a national university teaching hospital. Patients received emergency intubation because of impending respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, or severe trauma. The tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) was performed during emergency intubation with the transducer placed transversely at the trachea over the suprasternal notch. Quantitative waveform capnography was used as the criterion standard for confirmation of tracheal intubation. The main outcome was the concordance between the T.R.U.E. and the capnography.

Results

A total of 112 patients were included in the analysis, and 17 (15.2%) had esophageal intubations. The overall accuracy of the T.R.U.E. was 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.7–99.5%). The kappa (κ) value was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.84–1.00), indicating a high degree of agreement between the T.R.U.E. and capnography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the T.R.U.E. were 98.9% (95% CI: 94.3–99.8%), 94.1% (95% CI: 73.0–99.0%), 98.9% (95% CI: 94.3–99.8%) and 94.1% (95% CI: 73.0–99.0%). The median operating time of the T.R.U.E. was 9.0 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.0, 14.0).

Conclusions

The application of the T.R.U.E. to examine endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation is feasible, and can be rapidly performed.     

Transtracheal ultrasonographic confirmation of endotracheal intubation using I-gel and an endotracheal tube introducer

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy of transtracheal ultrasonography in confirming the placement of an endotracheal tube introducer during endotracheal intubation using the I-gel supraglottic airway as a guide.MethodsIn this prospective study, endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube introducer through the I-gel was performed in patients with return of spontaneous circulation after I-gel insertion for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The introducer placement was assessed by the occurrence of hyperechoic artifacts within the trachea or esophagus in transtracheal ultrasonography. Results of ultrasonography were confirmed by waveform capnography in the case of tracheal artifacts and direct visualization by laryngoscopy in the case of esophageal artifacts.ResultsOne hundred and six patients were enrolled in this study. In transtracheal ultrasonography, artifacts of introducer in the trachea and esophagus were observed in 80 (75.5%) and 26 (24.5%) patients, respectively. Transtracheal ultrasonography in identifying the placement of introducers revealed a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 95.4 to 100), specificity of 96.3% (95% CI 81.0 to 99.9), a PPV of 98.7% (95% CI 92.0 to 99.8), and a NPV of 100% (95% CI 94.8 to 99.9).ConclusionTranstracheal ultrasonography is an accurate method for identifying introducer placement during endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube introducer through the I-gel.     

The esophageal detector bulb in the aeromedical setting

To determine the accuracy of the Esophageal Detector Bulb (EDB) in the aeromedical setting, we conducted a prospective, observational study of all intubated patients transported by an aeromedical program over two years. Flight personnel recorded the results of the EDB, clinical examination, pulse oximetry, and capnography (ETCO(2)). Endotracheal tube position was confirmed by prehospital ETCO(2) or by the receiving emergency physician. There were 104 EDB assessments in 53 patients. The EDB correctly identified four of five esophageal intubations and 96 of 99 tracheal intubations. The sensitivity and specificity of the EDB in the detection of an esophageal intubation were 80% (95% CI, 38-96%) and 97% (95% CI, 92-99%), respectively, and the overall accuracy was 96% (95% CI, 90-98%). The EDB augments the ability of an aeromedical crew to determine endotracheal tube position, but its results must be carefully interpreted in the context of other available means of confirmation of endotracheal tube position.     

Evaluation of an electronic esophageal detector device in patients with morbid obesity and pulmonary failure

Objective. Undetected esophageal intubation can result in permanent injury or death. Clinical confirmation of tube location may be misleading. Adjunctive methods should be used to supplement clinical judgment. Unfortunately, end-tidal carbon dioxide may misidentify properly placed tracheal tubes in low perfusion situations, while esophageal detector devices (EDDs) may misidentify properly placed tracheal tubes in situations where little airway dead space exists (morbid obesity, pulmonary failure). This study evaluated a modified EDD (the electronic esophageal detector device, or EEDD) designed to eliminate the problem of misidentified tracheal intubations. Methods. Intubated morbidly obese or pulmonary failure patients were eligible for study entry. All endotracheal tubes (ETTs) were confirmed to be tracheal by waveform capnography and clinical judgment prior to study entry. Following consent, all patients were attached to the EEDD and a “measurement” was made to determine the “location” of their ETTs. Probability of misidentifying a tracheal intubation in these high-risk populations was calculated using a log-normal distribution method. Results. Twenty-seven morbidly obese patients and 37 pulmonary failure patients were entered. The EEDD correctly identified all tracheal intubations in these patients, giving a false-negative rate of zero. The probability of misidentifying a tracheal intubation in the combined group was 0.06%. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that the EEDD reliably identifies tracheal intubations in situations where standard EDDs may fail. However, future studies must determine the reliability of this device for identification of esophageal intubations and the reliability of this device in the less controlled emergency department and prehospital settings. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE 2002;6:59-64     

The sensitivity and specificity of transcricothyroid ultrasonography to confirm endotracheal tube placement in a cadaver model

Confirmation of endotracheal (ET) tube placement is critical when performing emergency airway management. No single confirmation strategy has emerged as ideal in all circumstances. Our objective in this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a novel approach to verify endotracheal intubation using transcricothyroid ultrasonography (US). We performed a prospective, randomized double-blinded trial in a human cadaver model. A 7.5-MHz curvilinear probe was placed longitudinally over the cricothyroid membrane as cadavers were randomly intubated in either the trachea or esophagus in two phases: 1) as the intubation was being performed (dynamic) and, 2) after intubation had been completed (static). Volunteer emergency medicine (EM) residents, blinded to tube placement, assessed for esophageal vs. tracheal ET placement using dynamic and static US views. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting esophageal ET placement with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Seven EM residents made a total of 70 dynamic and 70 static assessments of ET position using transcricothyroid US. Dynamic assessment resulted in 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity for detecting esophageal ET placement. Static assessment resulted in only 51% sensitivity and 91% specificity. This pilot study suggests that dynamic transcricothyroid US is a potentially accurate method of confirming ET placement during the intubation process. Further investigation in live humans is warranted to validate these data.     

Verification of Endotracheal Tube Position by Emergency Nurses Using Ultrasound: A Repeated Measures Cadaver Study

IntroductionEndotracheal intubation is a lifesaving procedure frequently performed in emergency departments. It is associated with some potential risks. Rapid and reliable confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during intubation is critical. Nurses play an important role in the care of patients in various settings. Ultrasound can be performed and interpreted not only by physicians but also by nurses. The aim of this study was to evaluate how well nurses without previous ultrasound experience can determine both esophageal and tracheal localization of endotracheal tubes in cadavers after a short ultrasound training.MethodsThis was a repeated measures study with an educational intervention and no control/contemporaneous comparison group. The study was performed to evaluate the ability of emergency nurses to confirm correct endotracheal tube placement and identify esophageal intubations. A total of 7 emergency nurses were given theoretical education and hands-on training about ultrasound. They diagnosed tracheal or esophageal intubation using ultrasound.ResultsFour cadavers were used 8 times each for the study. A total of 32 intubation procedures were evaluated with ultrasound by each nurse. In the analysis based on 224 responses, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and overall accuracy of ultrasound applied by nurses to detect tracheal intubation were 95.61% (90.06%-98.56%), 97.27% (92.24%-99.43%), 35.06 (11.48-107.10), 0.05 (0.02-0.11), and 96.43% (93.08%-98.45%), respectively. The mean time to evaluate the tube location by ultrasound was 6.57 seconds.DiscussionThe results support that ultrasound can be performed by nurses for the confirmation for esophageal and tracheal intubations quickly and accurately.     

How stylet use can effect confirmation of endotracheal tube position using ultrasound

Introduction

None of the techniques used for confirmation of endotracheal tube (ET) placement are proven reliable 100% of the time. The purpose of our study is to determine whether ultrasound can accurately detect the passage of ET through the trachea and esophagus and to see whether this visualization is augmented with the use of a metal stylet.

Methods

A total of 7 physicians made assessments of ET positions using an ultrasound during their passage through the trachea or esophagus. A total of 40 esophageal and 40 tracheal intubations were performed randomly in a blinded fashion on a fresh, unfrozen human cadaver. Half were performed with a metal stylet and the other half without a stylet.

Results

During transtracheal assessment regardless of stylet use, correct identification of ET position was achieved in 275 of 280 esophageal intubations and 268 of 280 tracheal intubations. The overall sensitivity was 95.7%, and specificity was 98.2%. The presence and the absence of stylet was identified in 109 of 280 and in 155 of 280 attempts, respectively. Correct identification of stylet presence yielded a sensitivity of 38.9% and a specificity of 55.4%.Ultrasound can be used by emergency physicians to accurately detect the passage of ET through the trachea and esophagus; however, stylet use did not augment ET visualization.     

The esophageal detector device: accuracy and reliability in difficult airway settings

INTRODUCTION: The esophageal detector device (EDD) recently has been found to assess endotracheal (ET) tube placement accurately. This study describes the reliability of the EDD in determining the position of the ET tube in clinical airway situations that are difficult. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled laboratory investigation. Two airway managers (an emergency-medicine attending physician and a resident) determined ET-tube placement using the EDD in five swine in respiratory arrest. The ET tube was place in the following clinical airway situations: 1) esophagus; 2) esophagus with 1 liter of air instilled; 3) trachea; 4) trachea with 5 ml/kg water instilled; and 5) right mainstem bronchus. Anatomic location of the tube was verified by thoracotomy of the left side of the chest. RESULTS: There was 100% correlation between the resident and attending physician's use of the EDD. The EDD was 100% accurate in the determining tube placement in the esophagus, in the esophagus with 1 liter of air instilled, in the trachea, and in the right mainstem bronchus. The airway managers were only 80% accurate in detecting tracheal intubations when fluid was present. CONCLUSIONS: The EDD is an accurate and reliable device for detecting ET-tube placement in most clinical situations. Tube placement in fluid-filled trachea, lungs, or both, which occurs in pulmonary edema and drowning, may not be detected using this device.     

Real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of tracheal ultrasonography for assessing endotracheal tube position during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).MethodsWe performed a prospective observational study of patients undergoing emergency intubation during CPR. Real-time tracheal ultrasonography was performed during the intubation with the transducer placed transversely just above the suprasternal notch, to assess for endotracheal tube positioning and exclude esophageal intubation. The position of trachea was identified by a hyperechoic air–mucosa (A–M) interface with posterior reverberation artifact (comet-tail artifact). The endotracheal tube position was defined as endotracheal if single A–M interface with comet-tail artifact was observed. Endotracheal tube position was defined as intraesophageal if a second A–M interface appeared, suggesting a false second airway (double tract sign). The gold standard of correct endotracheal intubation was the combination of clinical auscultation and quantitative waveform capnography. The main outcome was the accuracy of tracheal ultrasonography in assessing endotracheal tube position during CPR.ResultsAmong the 89 patients enrolled, 7 (7.8%) had esophageal intubations. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of tracheal ultrasonography were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.4–100%), 85.7% (95% CI: 42.0–99.2%), 98.8% (95% CI: 92.5–99.0%) and 100% (95% CI: 54.7–100%), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 7.0 (95% CI: 1.1–43.0) and 0.0, respectively.ConclusionsReal-time tracheal ultrasonography is an accurate method for identifying endotracheal tube position during CPR without the need for interruption of chest compression. Tracheal ultrasonography in resuscitation management may serve as a powerful adjunct in trained hands.     

The assessment of three methods to verify tracheal tube placement in the emergency setting

We studied prospectively the reliability of clinical methods, end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO(2)) detection, and the esophageal detector device (EDD) for verifying tracheal intubation in 137 adult patients in the emergency department. Immediately after intubation, the tracheal tube position was tested by the EDD and ETCO(2) monitor, followed by auscultation of the chest. The views obtained at laryngoscopy were classified according to the Cormack grade. Of the 13 esophageal intubations that occurred, one false-positive result occurred in the EDD test and auscultation. In the non-cardiac arrest patients (n=56), auscultation, the ETCO(2), and EDD test correctly identified 89.3, 98.2*, and 94.6%* of tracheal intubations, respectively (*, P<0.05 vs. the cardiac arrest patients). In the cardiac arrest patients (n=81), auscultation, the ETCO(2), and the EDD tests correctly identified 92.6**, 67.9, and 75.3% of tracheal intubations, respectively (**, P<0.05 vs. EDD and ETCO(2)). The frequencies of Cormack grade 1 or 2 were 83.9% in the non-cardiac arrest, and 95.1% in the cardiac arrest patients. In conclusion, the ETCO(2) monitor is the most reliable method for verifying tracheal intubation in non-cardiac arrest patients. During cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, however, negative results by the ETCO(2) or the EDD are not uncommon, and clinical methods are superior to the use of these devices.     

Ultrasound for Intubation Confirmation: A Randomized Controlled Study among Emergency Medicine Residents

Confirmation of endotracheal tube (ETT) placement during intubation is a critical skill for emergency medicine (EM) residents; airway ultrasonography has been suggested as an accessible and accurate method of ETT confirmation. Here, we investigated the accuracy with which EM residents could identify ETT location in cadavers using different ultrasound modes. EM attendings intubated either the trachea or the esophagus of a cadaver, and blinded residents identified ETT position using either B-mode or B-mode plus color Doppler. Residents correctly identified ETT location in 1075 of 1203 trials (89.4%); performance improved with post-graduate year (residents in post-graduate year 3 had 97.8% accurate identifications). There were 556 (91.7%) correct identifications made with B-mode and 519 (86.9%) with B-mode plus color Doppler (p value = 0.007); thus, accuracy did not improve with addition of color Doppler to B-mode. Further research is needed on the efficacy of different ultrasound modes in confirming ETT placement in live intubations.     

Confirmation of Endotracheal Tube Placement after Intubation Using the Ultrasound Sliding Lung Sign

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the ultrasound (US) sliding lung sign as a predictor of endotracheal tube (ETT) placement. Many other tools and examination findings have been used to confirm ETT placement; erroneous placement of the ETT has even been confirmed by US. Methods: This was a laboratory study using fresh, recently dead cadavers. Cadavers were obtained at a medical school anatomy laboratory on the basis of availability during a four‐month period. Subjects who died from significant trauma or after thoracic surgery were excluded. A numerical randomization tool was used to direct where the tube would be placed on intubation. Laryngoscopy was performed, and the ETT was placed in the esophagus, in the trachea, or in the right main stem (RMS) bronchus. Placement was confirmed by direct laryngoscopic visualization of ETT passage through vocal cords or with fiber optic visualization, as needed. US images of the sliding lung sign, sliding of visceral and parietal pleura past each other, were taken on both sides of the chest at the mid axillary line during ventilation with an ambu bag. Two board‐certified emergency physicians with hospital credentialing in emergency US used a 4‐2 MHz micro‐convex transducer on a Sonosite 180 Plus for imaging. The sonologists were blinded to the location of the endotracheal tube and imaged and recorded their results individually. A positive sliding lung sign was taken to signify lung expansion with ventilation in a hemithorax. Endotracheal versus esophageal ETT placement, as well as tracheal versus RMS, was determined on the basis of sliding lung findings on both sides of the chest. Interpreter agreement, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios (LHR) were calculated for tracheal (including RMS) versus esophageal, as well as main trachea versus RMS intubation. Results: Nine cadavers yielded 68 intubations. For esophageal versus tracheal (including RMS) intubation, sonologist 1 (S1) had a sensitivity of 95.4% (95% CI = 84.2% to 99.4%), a specificity of 100% (95% CI = 86.3% to 100%), an NPV of 92.6% (95% CI = 75.7% to 99.1%), and a PPV of 100% (95% CI = 91.4% to 100%) with an LHR of 0.05 (95% CI = 0.01 to 0.2) for a negative test. Sonologist 2 (S2) had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI = 91.8% to 100%), a specificity of 100% (95% CI = 86.3% to 100%), an NPV of 100% (95% CI = 86.3% to 100%), and a PPV of 100% (95% CI = 91.8% to 100%); agreement was 97% (κ= 0.94; 95% CI = 0.7 to 1.2). In RMS versus tracheal, S1 had a sensitivity of 69.2% (95% CI = 48.2% to 85.7%), a specificity of 93.3% (95% CI = 68.1% to 99.8%), a PPV of 94.7% (95% CI = 73.9% to 99.9%), and an NPV of 63.6% (95% CI = 40.7% to 82.8%) with an LHR for a positive test of 10.4 (95% CI = 2.2 to 59.1) and of 0.4 (95% CI = 0.2 to 0.6) for negative test. S2 had a sensitivity of 78.6% (95% CI = 59.1% to 91.7%), a specificity of 100% (95% CI = 78.2% to 100%), a PPV of 100% (95% CI = 84.6% to 100%), NPV of 71.4% (95% CI = 47.8% to 88.7%), with an LHR for a negative test of 0.2 (95% CI = 0.1 to 0.4); agreement was 85.9% (κ= 0.6; 95% CI = 0.4 to 0.9). Conclusions: These results show that US imaging of the sliding lung sign in a cadaver model is an accurate method for confirmation of ETT placement. Further, the technique may have some utility in differentiating RMS bronchus from main tracheal intubations.     

Ultrasonographic lung sliding sign in confirming proper endotracheal intubation during emergency intubation

Aim of study

Unrecognized one-lung intubations (also known as main-stem intubation) can lead to hypoventilation, atelectasis, barotrauma, and even patient death. Many traditional methods can be employed to detect one-lung intubation; however, each of these methods has limitations and is not consistently reliable in emergency settings. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and timeliness of ultrasound to confirm proper endotracheal intubation.

Methods

This was a prospective, single-center, observational study conducted at the emergency department of a national university teaching hospital. Patients received emergency tracheal intubation because of respiratory failure or cardiac arrest. After intubation, bedside ultrasound was performed with a transducer placed on the chest bilaterally at the mid-axillary line, to identify lung sliding over the lungs bilaterally during ventilation. Chest radiography was used as the criterion standard for confirmation of endotracheal tube position.

Results

One hundred and fifteen patients needing tracheal intubation were included, and nine (7.8%) had one-lung intubations. The overall accuracy of ultrasound to confirm proper endotracheal intubation was 88.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81.6–93.3%). The positive predictive value was 94.7% (95% CI: 87.1–97.9%) in the non-cardiac-arrest group and 100% (95% CI: 87.1–100.0%) in the cardiac-arrest group. The median operating time of ultrasound was 88 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 55.0, 193.0), and of chest radiography was 1349 s (IQR: 879.0, 2221.0) post intubation.

Conclusions

In this study, the positive predictive value of bilateral lung sliding in confirming proper endotracheal intubation was high, especially among patients with cardiac arrest. Considerable time advantage of ultrasound over chest radiography was demonstrated.     

Teaching basic EMTs endotracheal intubation: can basic EMTs discriminate between endotracheal and esophageal intubation?

HYPOTHESIS: Advanced airway intervention techniques are being considered for use by basic emergency medical technicians (EMTs). It was hypothesized that basic EMTs would be able to discriminate reliably between intratracheal and esophageal endotracheal tube placement in a mannequin model. DESIGN: An airway mannequin with a closed chest cavity was intubated randomly either esophageally or tracheally, and the cuff was inflated. A stethoscope, bag ventilator, and laryngoscope were available next to the mannequin. Placement was assessed by auscultation or direct visualization at the discretion of the EMT. A blinded investigator graded the student. SETTING: A classroom in a large, urban medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects were basic EMTs who volunteered to take part after the conclusion of a six-hour endotracheal intubation training course. RESULTS: Thirty-three subjects were tested. Seventeen of 18 (94%) tracheal intubations and 11 of 15 (73%) esophageal intubations were identified correctly. Only 72% of the students listened to the epigastrium, 81% listened to the lungs, and 85% attempted ventilation. The 10 students who visualized the cords discovered all five esophageal intubations. The 23 students who did not visualize the cords missed four and found six esophageal intubations. CONCLUSION: Basic EMTs had difficulty assessing endotracheal tube placement in a mannequin model. The 27% miss rate for identifying esophageal intubations suggests that basic EMTs will require additional training for safe field use of any airway that requires assessment of tube placement.     

Availability and use of capnography for in-hospital cardiac arrests in the United Kingdom

BackgroundAirway complications occur more frequently outside the operating theatre and in emergency situations. Capnography remains the gold standard for confirming correct endotracheal tube placement, retaining high sensitivity and specificity in cardiac arrest. The 2010 European Resuscitation Council guidelines for adult advanced life support recommended waveform capnography in this setting. We investigated current UK practice relating to the availability and use of this technology during cardiac arrest.MethodsBetween June and November 2014, a study was conducted of all UK acute hospitals with both a level three adult intensive care unit (ICU) and an emergency department (ED). A telephone questionnaire was administered examining intubation practice and utilisation of capnography within the ED, ICU and general wards.ResultsTwo hundred and eleven hospitals met the inclusion criteria. The response rate was 100%. Arrests were mainly attended by anaesthesia (48%) and ICU physicians (38%) of registrar grade (56%). The ability to measure end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO₂) was available in all but 4 EDs; most used in waveform devices. Most ICUs were similar. However, in 67% of hospitals surveyed, it was not possible to measure ETCO₂ in general wards. Where available, 87% used capnography to confirm ETT placement with less than 50% using ETCO₂ to determine CPR effectiveness and 8% to prognosticate.ConclusionsWe believe this is the first study of its kind to fully investigate the availability and use of capnography during cardiac arrest throughout the hospital. Whilst equipment provision appears adequate in critical care areas, it is insufficient in general wards.     

A review of detection techniques for oesophageal intubation

Inadvertent intubation of the oesophagus is an occasional complication of endotracheal intubation and can be fatal if unrecognised. Visualising the endotracheal tube pass between the vocal cords and capnography are established as the gold standard methods of ensuring tracheal placement, but both may be either impossible or impractical in certain emergency intubations. Colourimetric end tidal CO₂ detectors and oesophageal detector devices are alternative techniques. Of these oesophageal detector devices are the more accurate.