Rapid atrial pacing: a useful technique during slow pathway ablation

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is the treatment of choice for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with a success rate of 95-98%. The appearance of junctional rhythm during radiofrequency (RF) application to the slow pathway has been consistently reported as a marker for the successful ablation of AVNRT. Ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction during junctional rhythm has been used by many as a surrogate marker of antegrade atrioventricular nodal (AVN) function. However, VA conduction may not be an accurate or consistent marker for antegrade AVN function and reliance on this marker may leave some patients at risk for antegrade AVN injury. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe a technique to ensure normal antegrade AVN function during junctional rhythm at the time of RF catheter ablation of the slow pathway. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients less than 21 years old who underwent RF ablation for AVNRT at our institution from January 2002 to July 2005. During RF applications, immediately after junctional rhythm was demonstrated, RAP was performed to ensure normal antegrade AVN function. Postablation testing was performed to assess AVN function and tachycardia inducibility. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients underwent RF ablation of AVNRT during the study period. The mean age +/- SD was 14 +/- 3 years (range: 5-20 years). The weight was 53 +/- 15 Kg (range: 19-89 Kg). The preablation Wenckebach cycle length was 397 +/- 99 msec (range: 260-700 msec). Fifty-four patients had inducible typical AVNRT, and four patients had atypical tachycardia. The mean tachycardia cycle length +/- SD was 323 +/- 62 msec (range: 200-500 msec). Patients underwent of 8 +/- 7 total RF applications (median: 7; range 1 to 34), for a total duration of 123 +/- 118 seconds (median: 78 sec, range: 20-473 sec). Junctional tachycardia was observed in 52 of 54 patients. RAP was initiated during junctional rhythm in all patients. No patient developed any degree of transient or permanent AVN block. Following ablation, the Wenckebach cycle length decreased to 364 +/- 65 msec (P < 0.01). Acutely successful RF catheter ablation was obtained in 56 of 58 patients (96%). CONCLUSION: Rapid atrial pacing during radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway is a safe alternative approach to ensure normal AVN function.     

Clinical, Electrophysiological Characteristics, and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Tachycardia Near the Apex of Koch's Triangle

Atrial tachycardia, with its focus near the apex of Koch's triangle, may carry a potential risk of atrioventricular block during radiofrequency catheter ablation. The efficacy and safety of this procedure have never been addressed. The characteristics and catheter ablation results are reported for six patients with atrial tachycardia near the apex of Koch's triangle. All six patients were female aged 49.6 ± 9.3 years (range 39–63). Organic heart disease was present in 3 (50%) of the 6 patients. The P wave in surface ECG had a mean axis of − 28° (range − 90°–+ 30°) in the frontal plane. The catheter ablation was guided by activation sequence mapping. The energy was titrated from low power level. Atrial overdrive pacing was used to monitor the atrioventricular conduction should accelerated functional rhythm occur. At the final successful ablation site, the local atrial activation was 41.8 ± 9.1 ms before the P wave and His-bundle potential was present in 5 of the 6 patients. All patients had their atrial tachycardia eliminated without recurrence or heart block during a follow-up period of 17.7 ± 8.5 months (range 6–30). In conclusion, atrial tachycardia near the apex of Koch's triangle has distinct clinical and electrophysiological features, Radiofrequency catheter ablation can be performed effectively. However, extreme care must be taken to prevent inadvertent atrioventricular block. Titrated energy application and continuous monitoring of atrioventricular conduction are mandatory.     

Coexistence of a permanent form of a junctional reciprocating tachycardia and coronary sinus aneurysm: A case report

A 58‐year‐old man with a long R‐P' narrow QRS tachycardia underwent an electrophysiological study. The tachycardia was diagnosed as a permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia (PJRT), and the earliest atrial activation site during tachycardia was coronary sinus (CS) ostium. Radiofrequency ablation at the site was initially not successful because the tip impedance and temperature were unstable. After changing of the ablation catheter to that with contact force sensor, the accessory pathway was immediately ablated and the PJRT was no longer induced. A retrograde CS angiogram revealed a fusiform aneurysm, which was located at the earliest activation site during the tachycardia.     

Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy in Three Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Tachycardia

Radiofrequency ablation therapy was performed in three patients with paroxysmal atrial tachycardia. There were two females and one male, aged 80, 63, and 75 years, respectiveiy. All three patients had induction of sustained atrial tachycardia. The tachycardia could be terminated by overdrive atrial pacing or atrial premature stimulation; it could also be terminated by intravenous bolus of adenosine triphosphate. In all three patients, there was no fragmented atrial electrograms recorded within the right atrium, and there was no ventriculo-atrial conduction during ventricular pacing. Tiie earliest atrial activation during tachycardia in these three patients was registered, respectively, at a site slightly posterior and inferior to the His-bundle recording site, at the anterior-superior border of Koch's triangle slightly posterior to the His-bundle recording site, and at the mid-lateral aspect of the right atrium over the crista terminalis at the junction of right atrial appendage and sinus venarum. Radiofrequency current was deiivered to the site of the earliest atrial activation during tachycardia through a 4-mm tip electrode catheter. It resulted in termination of tachycardia and ablation of the tachycardia focus. FoIIow-up observation over a period of 16, 15, and 4 months, respectively, in these three patients showed no recurrence of tachycardia. A repeat eiectrophysiological study was performed 52 and 63 days after ablation in two patients and revealed no induction of atrial tachycardia.     

Reproducible induction of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with adenosine triphosphate

A 29-year-old woman was referred for electrophysiological testing and radiofrequency ablation because of repeated episodes of palpitation of a 8-year duration. The 12-lead ECG during palpitations showed narrow QRS tachycardia at a rate of 160 beats/min. Dual AVN physiology according to electrophysiological criteria was not shown by single atrial extrastimulation and the tachycardia could not be induced. Slow/fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) was induced once by double atrial extrastimuli, but it was not reproducible. However, intravenous bolus injection of adenosine triphosphate (12.5 mg) during sinus rhythm led to reproducible initiation of slow/fast AVNRT.     

Delayed Termination of Re-Entrant Atrioventricular Nodal Tachycardia

Termination of atriovontricular nodal (A VN) re-entrant tachycardia by one or two induced premature beats generally occurs within one tachycardia cycle from the last premature beat. Two cases are described in which programmed stimulation during sustained re-entrant AVN tachycardia caused delayed termination in the second or third tachycardia cycle following the extrastimuli. The site of block was the antegrade pathway in one case and the retrograde pathway in the other. The most likely mechanism was induced second degree block in one limb of the tachycardia circuit. Delayed termination provided evidence for concealed penetration of the tachycardia circuit in one case. We conclude that delayed termination of tachycardia is not an indicator of the underlying mechanism of tachycardia. Delayed termination may reveal concealed penetration of the tachycardia circuit. Lastly, in unusual cases programmed stimulation may fail to cause immediate termination of re-entrant tachycardia but may perturb the tachycardia circuit enough to cause termination in subsequent tachycardia cycles.     

Successful radiofrequency ablation of a slow atrioventricular nodal pathway on the left posterior atrial septum

RF catheter ablation is highly effective in eliminating atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia by targeting the slow pathway in the posteroinferior part of Koch's triangle in the right atrium. We report here a patient in whom "slow-fast" atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was eliminated only by ablation of the slow pathway in the left atrial posteroseptal region at the level of the mitral annulus after unsuccessful attempts at the traditional site on the right side.     

Electrophysiological Significance of QRS Alternans in Narrow QRS Tachycardia

To investigate the electrophysiological significance of QRS alternans during narrow QRS tachycardia, transesophageal atrial pacing and recording was performed in 24 patients with a history of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Standard electrocardiograms showed ventricular preexcitation in 15 patients and normal QRS pattern in nine patients. The ventriculoatrial interval during tachycardia, as defined by means of transesophageal electrogram, allowed tentative diagnosis of the tachycardia mechanism. A 12-lead ECG was recorded either during spontaneous or induced tachycardia, as well as during transesophageal atrial pacing at increasing rates. Electrical alternans occurred spontaneously in eight patients (33%, group A): five with accessory pathway reentry (mean VA: 136 +/- 43 msec), and three with AV nodal reentry (mean VA: 48.3 +/- 12 msec). Tachycardia rate ranged between 170 and 230 beats/min (mean 200.7 +/- 16). In two patients, alternation of the QRS occurred only in the presence of a heart rate exceeding 180 and 190 beats/min, respectively. The amplitude of QRS remained stable during tachycardia in 16 patients (67%, group B): 14 had accessory pathway reentry (mean VA: 137.5 +/- 32 msec), and two had AV nodal reentry (mean VA: 45 +/- 7 msec). In this group, the tachycardia rate ranged from 150 to 210 beats/min (mean 175 +/- 12). Incremental transesophageal atrial pacing up to rates equal to that of tachycardia was performed in five patients from group A and in five patients from group B. Electrical alternans could not be induced in both groups with pacing at progressively increasing rates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The electrophysiological characteristics in patients with ventricular stimulation inducible fast-slow form atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can usually be induced by atrial stimulation. However, it seldom may be induced with only ventricular stimulation, especially the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the specific electrophysiological characteristics in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. METHODS: The total population consisted of 1,497 patients associated with AVNRT, and 106 (8.4%) of them had the fast-slow form of AVNRT and 1,373 (91.7%) the slow-fast form of AVNRT. In patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT, the AVNRT could be induced with only ventricular stimulation in 16 patients, Group 1; with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation in 90 patients, Group 2; and with only atrial stimulation in 13 patients, Group 3. We also divided these patients with slow-fast form AVNRT (n = 1,373) into two groups: those that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation (Group 4; n = 45, 3%) and those that could be induced by atrial stimulation only or by both atrial and ventricular stimulation (n = 1.328, 97%). RESULTS: Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of an antegrade dual AVN physiology (0% vs 71.1% and 92%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of multiple form AVNRT (31% vs 69% and 85%, P = 0.009), and a more significant retrograde functional refractory period (FRP) difference (99 +/- 102 vs 30 +/- 57 ms, P < 0.001) than those that could be induced with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The occurrence of tachycardia stimulated with only ventricular stimulation was more frequently demonstrated in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT (15% vs 3%, P < 0.001). Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a higher incidence of retrograde dual AVN physiology (75% vs 4%, P < 0.001), a longer pacing cycle length of retrograde 1:1 fast and slow pathway conduction (475 +/- 63 ms vs 366 +/- 64 ms, P < 0.001; 449 +/- 138 ms vs 370 +/- 85 ms, P = 0.009), a longer retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (360 +/- 124 ms vs 285 +/- 62 ms, P = 0.003), and a longer retrograde FRP of the fast and slow pathway (428 +/- 85 ms vs 362 +/- 47 ms, P < 0.001 and 522 +/- 106 vs 456 +/- 97 ms, P = 0.026) than those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a different incidence of the antegrade and retrograde dual AVN physiology and the specific electrophysiological characteristics. The mechanism of the AVNRT stimulated only with ventricular stimulation was supposed to be different in patients with the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AVNRT.     

The effects of atrial fibrillation on coronary blood flow and performance of ischaemic myocardium in dogs with coronary artery stenosis

1. Atrial fibrillation may impair coronary blood flow by tachycardia and reflex vasoconstriction. It has not been documented, however, whether in the presence of coronary stenosis atrial fibrillation exceeds the effects of rhythmic atrial tachycardia. 2. The effects of experimentally induced atrial fibrillation compared with atrial tachycardia, therefore, were tested in 22 anaesthetized dogs. Stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery was induced to reduce coronary blood flow by about 40%. 3. In the presence of coronary stenosis, atrial fibrillation (ventricular rate: 234 +/- 21 beats/min) reduced coronary blood flow from 58 +/- 7 to 44 +/- 8 ml min-1 100 g-1 (P less than 0.001, mean +/- SEM) and subendocardial segment shortening (ultrasonic crystals) from 12 +/- 2 to 4 +/- 2% (P less than 0.0025), and resulted in a lactate production of 30 +/- 11% (P less than 0.005 vs sinus rhythm). 4. Atrial tachycardia (heart rate: 216 +/- 21 beats/min, NS vs atrial fibrillation) did not significantly change coronary blood flow and reduced segment shortening to 7 +/- 3% (P less than 0.05 vs atrial fibrillation). Significant lactate production did not occur. 5. Since mean arterial pressure fell from 100 +/- 4 mmHg at sinus rhythm to 89 +/- 3 mmHg (P less than 0.01) during atrial fibrillation but not during atrial tachycardia, it was held constant in 13 dogs by a pressurized blood reservoir. Coronary blood flow, however, fell from 43 +/- 6 to 36 +/- 5 ml min-1 100 g-1 (P less than 0.0025). 6. Thus atrial fibrillation may reduce coronary blood flow and induce myocardial ischaemia in the presence of coronary stenosis in excess of atrial tachycardia.     

Electrophysiological characteristics of junctional rhythm during ablation of the slow pathway in different types of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Junctional rhythm (JR) is commonly observed during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, the atrial activation pattern and conduction time from the His-bundle region to the atria recorded during JR in different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia have not been fully defined. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included; 27 patients with slow-fast, 11 patients with slow-intermediate, and 7 patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The atrial activation pattern and HA interval (from the His-bundle potential to the atrial recording of the high right atrial catheter) during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (HA(SVT)) and JR (HA(JR)) were analyzed. RESULTS: In all patients with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence recorded during JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway, and transient retrograde conduction block during JR was found in 1 (4%) patient. The HA(JR) was significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (57 +/- 24 vs 68 +/- 21 ms, P < 0.01). In patients with slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence of the JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway in 5 (45%), and to that of the retrograde intermediate pathway in 6 (55%) patients. Transient retrograde conduction block during JR was noted in 1 (9%) patient. The HA(JR) was also significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (145 +/- 27 vs 168 +/- 29 ms, P = 0.014). In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, retrograde conduction with block during JR was noted in 7 (100%) patients. The incidence of retrograde conduction block during JR was higher in fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia than slow-fast (7/7 vs 1/11, P < 0.01) and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (7/7 vs 1/27, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with slow-fast and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the JR during ablation of the slow pathway conducted to the atria through the fast or intermediate pathway. In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, there was no retrograde conduction during JR. These findings suggested there were different characteristics of the JR during slow-pathway ablation of different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Radiofrequency ablation of probable atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children with documented supraventricular tachycardia without inducible tachycardia

The reproducible induction of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) during electrophysiological study is critical for the diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), and for determining a therapeutic endpoint for catheter ablation. In the sedated state, there are patients with reentry SVT due to AVNRT who are not inducible at electrophysiological study. This article reports on the empiric slow pathway modification for AVNRT in six pediatric patients (age 6-17, mean 13.3 years) with documented, recurrent, paroxysmal SVT in the setting of a structurally normal heart who were not inducible at electrophysiological study. Atrial and ventricular burst and extrastimulus pacing at multiple drive cycle lengths were performed in the baseline state, during an isuprel infusion, and during isuprel elimination. Single AV nodal (AVN) echo beats were present in all patients, while classic dual AVN physiology was present in three of six patients. Radiofrequency energy was administered in the right posteroseptal AV groove resulting in accelerated junctional rhythm in five of six patients. Postablation testing demonstrated the elimination of echo beats in four patients, while dual AVN physiology and echo beats persisted in two patients. At follow-up (22-49 months, mean 29.5 months), all patients are asymptomatic without recurrence of SVT and are not taking any antiarrhythmic medication. In selected patients, empiric slow pathway modification may be offered as a potential cure in children with recurrent paroxysmal SVT who are not inducible at electrophysiological study. Elimination of slow pathway conduction may serve as a surrogate endpoint, though is not necessary for long-term success.     

Prospective evaluation of catheter ablation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and multiple inappropriate ICD therapies due to atrial fibrillation and type I atrial flutter

The high incidence of inappropriate therapies due to drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia remains a major unsolved problem of the ICD. Most of the inappropriate therapies for supraventricular tachycardia are caused by AF and type I atrial flutter with rapid ventricular response. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the usefulness of AVN modulation or ablation for rapid AF and ablation of the tricuspid annulus-inferior vena cava (TA-IVC) isthmus for type I atrial flutter in ICD patients with frequent inappropriate ICD interventions. Eighteen consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Twelve patients received a mean of 34 +/- 36 antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and 41 +/- 32 shock therapies for rapid AF during 49 +/- 39 months, and 6 patients a mean of 111 +/- 200 ATP and 11 +/- 8 shock therapies for type I atrial flutter during 52 +/- 37 months preceding ablation procedure. Modification of the AVN was successful in 10 (83%) of 12 AF patients, in 2 (17%) patients ablation of the AVN was performed. A complete TA-IVC isthmus block was achieved in 5 (83%) of 6 atrial flutter patients. Three (25%) AF patients had 11 +/- 24 recurrences of ATP and 0.4 +/- 1.1 shock therapies for rapid AF during 15 +/- 7 months. None of the atrial flutter patients had recurrences of inappropriate therapies for type I atrial flutter during 14 +/- 8 months, but two (33%) patients had inappropriate ICD therapies for type II atrial flutter or rapid AF. There was an overall mean incidence of 18 +/- 22 inappropriate ICD therapies per 6 months before and 4 +/- 9 per 6 months after the ablation procedure (P < 0.05). In conclusion, radiofrequency catheter modification or ablation of the AVN for rapid AF and ablation for atrial flutter type I are demonstrated to be highly effective in the majority of ICD patients with drug refractory multiple inappropriate ICD therapies.     

Effects of a blocked atrial beat on the atrioventricular nodal recovery property in patients with dual nodal pathways

Dual AVN physiology can be demonstrated by a variety of maneuvers. To determine whether AVN recovery times following a blocked extrastimulus facilitate or obscure detection of dual AVN physiology, 11 patients (9-17 years) were studied with dual AVN pathways by using single and double atrial extrastimuli. With a single atrial extrastimuli, the premature atrial stimulus (A2) was coupled to basic atrial beats (A1). The fast and slow AVN recovery curves were constructed with plots of the nodal conduction time against the recovery time (A1A2,A2H2). With double atrial extrastimuli, a fixed blocked A2 beat (A2B) was followed by a scanning atrial beat (A3). The nodal recovery property post-A2B was studied by plots of A2BA3,A3H3. In all patients the recovery curve of the fast pathway post-A2B had a leftward shift when compared to that of the pre-A2B curve (i.e., the AH was shortened at the same recovery time). The window of slow pathway conduction post-A2B disappeared totally in five patients and decreased significantly in six patients (post-A2B: 26 +/- 42 ms; pre-A2B: 80 +/- 65 ms, P < 0.05). In the six patients that still had slow pathway conduction post-A2B, the slow pathway effective refractory period post-A2B was significantly less than that of pre-A2B (215 +/- 38 vs 268 +/- 16 ms, P < 0.05). The fast pathway effective refractory period post-A2B was also diminished significantly (235 +/- 62 vs 357 +/- 76 ms, P < 0.0001). The authors conclude that blocked atrial beats decrease the visibility of the slow pathway conduction.     

Intrahisian conduction disease and junctional ectopic tachycardia

Junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET) is an uncommon arrhythmia that mainly affects pediatric patients. However, its clinical presentation may rarely occur in adulthood. Owing to its incessant nature, limited responsiveness to antiarrhythmic agents and poor prognosis, catheter ablation of the junctional focus is often required, even though this may be accompanied by the occurrence of complete atrioventricular block. We report the case of a 68-year-old man with episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia and repetitive JET whose initiation was often anticipated by a sudden intrahisian conduction delay in the immediately preceding sinus beats.     

Successful Radiofrequency Energy Ablation of Automatic Junctional Tachycardia Preserving Normal Atrioventricular Nodal Conduction

Automatic junctional tachycardia is frequently refractory to medical management and difficult to treat with nonpharmacoJogical methods. A 12-year-old female with symptomatic, refractory automatic junctional tachycardia is reported. Earliest atrial activation during supraventricular tachycardia was in the posterior portion of the intraatrial septum. The patient underwent electrophysiological study and successful radiofrequency current ahiation of the ectopic automatic focus within the atrioventricuiar junction. Normal atrioventricular junctional conduction was maintained, and at 7-month foJlow-up the patient has been free of tachycardia.     

Recurrent syncope triggered by inappropriate sinus tachycardia

A 25-year-old woman with daily episodes of syncope and several related traumatic injuries was referred for electrophysiological study. Structural heart disease was excluded. Electrophysiological study revealed inappropriate sinus tachycardia with heart rates up to 190 beats/min. A sinus node modulation was performed. However, 5 days later the patient again developed syncope during sinus tachycardia at rates of 140 beats/min with systolic blood pressure of 60 mmHg. The patient subsequently underwent AVN ablation and implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker. The patient has remained asymptomatic during a 12-month follow-up. This article reports on the first case of a moderate sinus tachycardia in a structurally normal heart as an underlying mechanism of recurrent episodes of syncope. While moderate supraventricular tachycardia in a structurally normal heart alone is unlikely to explain the severe symptoms, additional sympathovagal or humoral mechanisms induced by sinus tachycardia may contribute to syncopal events in this patient.     

Incessant Ventricular Tachycardia with a Right Bundle-Branch Block Pattern and Left Axis Deviation Abolished by Catheter Manipulation

A 22-year-old man underwent electrophysiological evaluation for incessant wide QRS complex tachycardia with a pattern of right bundle-branch block and left axis deviation. The right and left ventricles were enlarged and hypokinetic consistent with dilated cardiomyopathy. Ventricular tachycardia was diagnosed by demonstrating capture and fusion beats, atrioventricular dissociation, and His potential activation that began after the onset of each QRS complex. Atrial extrastimuli and rapid atrial pacing failed to terminate the tachycardia and, although ventricular stimulation was successful, the tachycardia spontaneously restarted after one or two sinus beats. The tachycardia was unexpectedly abolished during catheter manipulation in the left ventricle and has not recurred during three-years of follow-up. The picture of a cardiomyopathy resolved. The ease with which the tachycardia was abolished by catheter manipulation implicate a therapeutic potential for catheter ablation of this type of tachycardia.     

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Concealed Atrio-His Bypass Tract Involved in Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia

In a patient with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and without any evidence for preexcitation syndrome or dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways, the tachycardia reentry circuit consisted of the AV node as an antegrade limb of the circuit and a concealed atrio-His bypass tract located in the posterior septum as a retrograde limb. During the tachycardia, the atrial potentials in the septal region and coronary sinus were inscribed in the QRS complex, and the earliest atrial activation site was located in the posterior septum. Ventricular extrastimulation at critically short intervals reproducibly demonstrated a ventriculo-His-atrial activation sequence with the same earliest retrograde atrial activation site as that during the tachycardia. Radiofrequency energy (20 W) was applied to this earliest activation site during ventricular pacing, which resulted in complete ventriculo-atrial block within 2 seconds after energy application. The antegrade AV conduction property was not affected and the tachycardia was no longer induced. The patient has been free from tachycardia attack for a follow-up period of 8 months. Therefore, radiofrequency catheter ablation for an atrio-His bypass tract is feasible without inducing any AV conduction disturbance.     

Comparison of Isoproterenol and Exercise Tests in Asymptomatic Subjects with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

In order to evaluate the effects of increases of sympathetic tone in ventricular response during atrial fibrillation and in the relationship between the accessory pathway effective refractory period (ERP) and ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation, 20 male subjects, aged 19 +/- 6 years, were studied electrophysiologically in basal conditions, after isoproterenol infusion (2-4 micrograms/min) and during submaximal bicycle exercise test, at a constant workload equal to that which increases the sinus rate to the same extent (140 beats/min) induced by isoproterenol infusion. Accessory pathway ERP was evaluated at the same driven rate (150 beats/min) in both instances. In the control study as during both tests atrial fibrillation paroxysms were induced by burst stimulation. In control conditions the rate increase from 100 to 150 beats/min induced a reduction of accessory pathway ERP from 266 +/- 27 msec to 244 +/- 22 msec (P less than 0.005). At the same driven rate of 150 beats/min, isoproterenol infusion and exercise test induced a more marked shortening of accessory pathway ERP to 211 +/- 28 msec (P less than 0.005) and to 214 +/- 29 msec (P less than 0.005), respectively. Atrial fibrillation paroxysms lasting more than 10 seconds were induced in 20/20 cases in the control study, in 15/20 during isoproterenol infusion and in 13/19 cases during exercise test. The shortest cycle length during atrial fibrillation was reduced from a basal value of 253 +/- 72 msec to 204 +/- 27 msec (P less than 0.05) during isoproterenol infusion and to 236 +/- 32 msec (NS) during exercise test.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)