Validation of the German version of the Brief Pain Inventory.

The Brief Pain Inventory is a comprehensive instrument for pain assessment and has been validated in several languages. A validated German version was not available until now. From March to May 1995 all outpatients of the pain clinic of the Department of Anesthesiology completed a questionnaire with the German versions of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire. The BPI was repeated after the consultation. The physician assessed the performance status score of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). The questionnaire was completed by 151 patients. Forty-two patients were excluded from evaluation for methodological reasons, so 109 patients were evaluated. As in the original version of the BPI, factor analysis showed a common factor for pain intensity and a second factor for pain-related interference with function. The comparative fit index of 0.86 confirmed this model. Responses before and after consultation correlated closely for the sum scores of the pain intensity items (Perarson correlation r = 0.976) as well as for the interference with function items (r = 0.974). Pain intensity in the BPI correlated with bodily pain in the SF-36 (r = 0.585). Sum scores of the pain interference items were higher in patients with deteriorated ECOG performance status, whereas sum scores of the intensity items were not changed. Validity and reliability of the German BPI were comparable to the original version. The BPI may be advantageous for palliative care patients, as it places only a small burden on the patient and offers easy criteria for evaluation. However, further research is needed to differentiate the impact of pain-related and disease-related interference with function on the BPI, and to find an algorithm for the evaluation of the BPI when values are missing.     

Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain.

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI; Cleeland and associates) has been used primarily to assess patients with cancer-related pain. Although it has been validated in many languages and is widely used, there has not yet been research published to validate its use for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain as the primary presenting problem. This study was designed to fill this gap by examining the psychometric properties of the BPI in 440 patients with chronic intractable pain referred to a chronic pain clinic at a metropolitan tertiary-care teaching hospital. Results indicated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach alpha coefficients were.85 for the intensity items and.88 for the interference items). A factor analysis resulted in 2 distinct and independent factors, supporting the validity of the 2-factor structure of the BPI. Zero-order correlations indicated that the association with a measure of disability (the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ]) was significantly higher for BPI interference (r = 0.57) than for BPI intensity (r = 0.40, t = 5.71, P <.01) and that the correlation with BPI interference was not more than 0.80, supporting the conclusion that these scales assess related, but also distinct, dimensions. Finally, the finding that both BPI scales showed statistically significant improvement with treatment confirms the responsivity of BPI in detecting and reflecting improvement in pain over time. PERSPECTIVE: This paper validated the psychometric properties of a pain Assessment instrument (The Brief Pain Inventory) originally developed to assess cancer pain and extended its use for the chronic nonmalignant pain population. This provides an important and widely used diagnostic tool for the clinician treating chronic pain.     

Pain in ambulatory HIV‐positive South Africans

We investigated the prevalence and intensity of pain, factors associated with having pain, and analgesic medications employed in a population consisting predominantly of Black African and female human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐positive individuals attending outpatient clinics in a rural (n = 125; 79% female; 100% Black African) and a metropolitan (n = 396; 75% female; 94% Black African) area of South Africa. Pain intensity, interference and treatment were assessed using the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire. Seventy‐two percent of rural participants and 56% of metropolitan participants had pain at the time of the interview, and this pain was moderate to severe in intensity in 60% of rural participants and 59% of metropolitan participants. Forty‐six percent of rural participants and 61% of metropolitan participants had multiple pain sites. The most common pain sites in rural participants were the abdomen (30%), chest (26%), head (19%) and genitals (15%), while in the metropolitan cohort the head (39%), feet (33%), chest (30%) and abdomen (20%) were the most common sites. In the rural cohort, antiretroviral therapy was independently associated with reduced risk of pain, while in the metropolitan cohort increasing age was weakly, but independently associated with having pain. Pharmacological management of pain was poor, with 29% of rural participants and 55% of metropolitan participants with pain not receiving any treatment. Of those receiving treatment, no participants were receiving strong opioids, and only 3% of metropolitan participants were receiving a weak opioid. Thus, HIV‐related pain is common and is poorly treated in both the rural and metropolitan setting in South Africa.     

The dimensionality of pain: palliative care and chronic pain patients differ in their reports of pain intensity and pain interference

The accurate, precise, and consistent assessment of pain is of particular importance in palliative care. The European Palliative Care Research Collaborative is developing a computer-based pain assessment instrument and has been evaluating the content and dimensionality of existing pain questionnaires. The most important dimensions of pain are intensity and interference. However, since pain interference is a consequence of and largely reflects pain intensity, we postulated that it might either provide information to enhance the evaluation of intensity, or that an overall summary measure of pain severity could be constructed by combining the 2 dimensions. Cancer patients in palliative care (n=395) and chronic pain patients (n=168) completed questionnaires that included 23 pain items culled from existing questionnaires. Psychometric analyses confirmed the existence of 2 main dimensions, intensity and interference, and also guided identification of items that contributed most strongly to these dimensions. However, there was strong evidence that the relationship between the intensity and the interference items differs markedly in palliative care patients compared to chronic pain patients. As hypothesized, there was strong correlation between intensity and interference, lending support to the possibility that, for some purposes, these dimensions may be combined to provide a higher-level summary measure of patients' pain experience. We conclude that these dimensions should be kept distinct when assessing patients in general, although for a single type of patient (such as palliative care patients), it may be possible to regard intensity and interference as contributing to an overall measure of pain severity.     

Developing a translation of the McGill pain questionnaire for cross-cultural comparison: an example from Norway

The ability to measure pain across diverse cultures is important for understanding the universal aspects of pain and expediting nursing intervention The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) is the most valid and reliable single multidimensional pain instrument available for measuring pain Although it has been translated in several languages, most efforts, including two Norwegian translations, have resulted in a variety of new versions, all lacking sufficient faithfulness to the original MPQ to allow qualitative or quantitative cross-cultural comparisons There is a need for direct translations that maintain the original denotation, connotation and numerical value of the MPQ and thus provide a base for future cross-cultural studies of pain This paper reports on the development and initial testing of a direct translation of the McGill Pain Questionnaire into Norwegian (NMPQ) The translation process involved three phases translation, back-translation and consensual In order to evaluate its performance and validity, the NMPQ was administered to a group of adult surgical patients at two different points in time during the postoperative period The NMPQ was examined for its feasibility, its sensitivity in detecting decreases in intensity of pain postoperatively and for construct validity A visual analogue scale was used to check for converging validity, and Spielberger's state anxiety scale was used to assess discriminate validity The initial testing of the NMPQ with adult surgical patients suggests that the NMPQ is culturally acceptable, relevant, sensitive to fluctuations in pain and numerically consistent with the original MPQ The moderate levels of validity attained lend considerable assurance to the instrument's readiness for use in cross-cultural studies of pain     

The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with spinal cord injury.

The current study compared the psychometric properties of 2 commonly used measures of pain-related interference, the Graded Chronic Pain (GCP) Disability scale and 3 modified versions of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference scale. Participants were 127 persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) who reported pain on a survey. The results suggest that the GCP Disability scale and 3 versions of the BPI Interference scale are reliable and valid measures of pain-related interference in persons with SCI and pain. All 4 measures evidenced excellent internal consistency. The composite scores and individual items of the GCP Disability scale and each version of the BPI Interference scale were significantly related to average pain intensity during the past week and a global measure of psychological functioning. Finally, as pain intensity ratings increased (from mild to moderate to severe), so did the composite and item-level ratings of interference for each version of the BPI Interference scale and GCP Disability scale. Strengths and weaknesses of each measure for use with persons with disability and pain are discussed. PERSPECTIVE: The GCP Disability scale and 3 versions of the BPI Interference scale (modified for use in persons with disabilities) appear to be reliable and valid measures of pain-related interference in persons with SCI. Future research should examine their psychometric properties in other disability populations.     

Prevalence and Correlates of Low Pain Interference Among Patients With High Pain Intensity Who Are Prescribed Long-Term Opioid Therapy

The pain experience may vary greatly among individuals reporting equally high levels of pain. We sought to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with pain interference in patients with high pain intensity. Among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain who were prescribed long-term opioid therapy and who were recruited from 2 health care systems, we identified a subset who reported high pain intensity (n?=?189). All individuals completed self-report assessments of clinical and demographic factors. Analyses examined characteristics associated with pain interference. Within this group of patients with high reported pain intensity, 16.4% (n?=?31) had low pain interference, 39.2% (n?=?74) had moderate pain interference, and 44.4% (n?=?84) had high pain interference. In bivariate analyses, patients with lower pain interference had fewer symptoms of depression and anxiety, less pain catastrophizing, a better quality of life, and greater self-efficacy for managing pain. In multivariate analyses, variables most strongly associated with low pain interference, relative to high interference, were depression severity (odds ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.82-0.99) and pain self-efficacy (odds ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.12). Study results suggest that chronic pain treatments that address symptoms of depression and enhance pain self-efficacy may be prioritized, particularly among patients who are prescribed long-term opioid therapy.Perspective: This article describes the prevalence and correlates of pain interference categories (low, medium, and high) among patients with high pain intensity who are prescribed long-term opioid therapy. Findings reveal that 16.4% of participants with high pain intensity had low impairment. Multivariate analyses indicate that variables significantly associated with low pain interference were lower depression scores and greater pain self-efficacy.     

Race and socioeconomic differences in post-settlement outcomes for African American and Caucasian Workers' Compensation claimants with low back injuries

The purpose of this study was to predict post-settlement pain intensity, psychological distress, disability, and financial struggle among African American (n=580) and non-Hispanic Caucasian (n=892) Workers' Compensation claimants with single incident low back injury. The study was a population-based telephone survey conducted in three population centers in Missouri. Post-settlement outcomes were predicted from claimant demographics (race, age, gender); socioeconomic status (SES); diagnosis and legal representation; and Workers' Compensation resolution variables (treatment costs, temporary disability status, disability rating, settlement costs). Simultaneous-entry, hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses indicated that African American race and lower SES predicted higher levels of post-settlement pain intensity, psychological distress (general mental health, pain-related catastrophizing), disability (pain-related role interference), and financial struggle, independent of age, gender, diagnosis, legal representation, and Workers' Compensation resolution variables. The results suggest that African American race and lower SES-relative to Caucasian race and higher SES-are risk factors for poor outcomes after occupational low back injury. Mechanisms to explain these associations are discussed, including patient-level, provider-level, legal, and Workers' Compensation system-level factors.     

Translation and Validation of Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) in English and Korean

Purpose: To describe the translation and validation of the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) Use Questionnaire.
Methods: The NIC Use Questionnaire was translatpd to Kurmri using back-translation and three criteria to test the semantic, content, and technical equivalence of the original and translated versions.
Findings: Three factors made translation difficult including structural differences in the two languages, long modifier phrases in English, and nonequivalent words in Korean.
Conclusions: This translation facilitates communication among nurses. The findings suggest a method for similar validation in other languages.     

Validation of the English and translated Chinese version of the Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool for cancer caregivers (CNAT-C)

Abstract

The 41-item Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool for Cancer Caregivers (CNAT-C) is an English language survey for needs assessment developed and validated in South Korean cancer caregivers. The objective of this study was to validate both the English and a translated Chinese version of the CNAT-C in cancer caregivers in Singapore.

This was a cross-sectional survey where cancer caregivers completed the CNAT-C and World Health Organisation Quality-of-life BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) in English or Chinese. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure internal consistency. Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients between CNAT-C scores and WHOQOL-BREF domains. For known groups validity, independent samples t-test was used to compare CNAT-C scores based on Karnofsky performance status.

There were 161 cancer caregivers – 80 answered the English version and 81 answered the Chinese version. For the English version, 33.8% were male and the mean age was 46.9 years. For the Chinese version, 27.2% were male and the mean age was 52.6 years. The total CNAT-C score and most domain scores showed good internal consistency, low to moderate convergent validity with WHOQOL-BREF domains and good known groups validity with performance status in both the English and Chinese versions. Domain 1 (health and psychological problems) in the Chinese version did not show convergent validity although there was evidence of known groups validity. Domain 5 (religious/spiritual support) also did not show validity in our study sample.

In summary, there was low to moderate convergent validity with the WHOQOL-BREF for both the English and translated Chinese versions. However, both language versions of CNAT-C showed good internal consistency and good known groups validity according to performance status, and both language versions of the CNAT-C can be used to assess the level of unmet needs for cancer caregivers in the Singapore context.     

Reliability study in five languages of the translation of the pain behavioural scale Doloplus®

Non-verbal pain assessment scales are useful tools for pain evaluation in persons with communication disorders and moderate–severe dementia. The Doloplus^® was one of the first scales to be developed and validated as a pain assessment tool in older adults with dementia. This study aims at evaluating the translation of the Doloplus^® scale in five languages, as regards test–retest and inter-rater reliability. Results show that both tests are good or excellent for the English, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish versions and moderate for the Dutch version. These results bring a unique opportunity to include the translated Doloplus^® scale in daily assessment of elderly persons with communication disorders, and future studies should focus on enriching the validation of the scale in each language.     

Development of a self-reporting questionnaire, BURMIG, to evaluate the burden of migraine

We developed a 77-item self-reporting questionnaire to assess the burden of migraine (BURMIG), including headache characteristics, migraine associated disability, comorbidities, management, and the consequences on the patients' lives. We translated BURMIG into four languages (French, Portuguese, German and English) and tested it in 130 headache patients (20 pain clinic, 17 primary care and 93 general public) in Luxembourg. We performed a linguistic and a face-content validation and tested the questionnaire for its comprehensiveness, internal consistency and for its retest-reliability at an interval of 1 month (completion rates were 79.6 and 76.4%, for test and retest, respectively). Retest-reliability for the different parts of the questionnaire varied between 0.6 and 1.0 (Kappa coefficient), with an intracorrelation coefficient of 0.7-1.0. The internal consistency was between 0.74 and 0.91 (Cronbach's alpha). The questionnaire BURMIG is suitable to evaluate the burden of migraine and can be used in English, German, French and Portuguese.     

Lidocaine patch treatment in patients with low back pain: results of an open-label, nonrandomized pilot study

This prospective, 6-week, multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized pilot study was designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of a lidocaine patch 5% in patients with low back pain (LBP). Patients with moderate to severe LBP, defined as acute/subacute (< 3 months, n = 21), short-term chronic (3-12 months, n = 33), or long-term chronic (> 12 months, n = 77), were recruited from 5 clinics; participants applied < or = 4 patches (560 cm total) once daily to area of maximal LBP as add-on treatment through week 2, with the option to taper concomitant analgesics during weeks 3-6. Scores on Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were obtained at weeks 2 and 6. Safety analyses included reports of adverse events (AEs) and skin sensitivity to pinprick/light touch. Significant improvements in average daily pain intensity on the BPI were noted at weeks 2 and 6 (P < or = 0.001). Significant improvements in pain interference with quality of life (QOL) were noted for all BPI measures of QOL at weeks 2 and 6 for the acute/subacute (P < or = 0.007) and long-term chronic LBP groups (P < 0.0001) and for 5 of 7 BPI measures for the short-term chronic LBP group (P < or = 0.042). Fifty-eight percent of patients reported being "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with treatment. The lidocaine patch was well tolerated. Most common AEs were dizziness and rash (n = 5, 3.8%), and most AEs (80%) were mild to moderate in intensity. Significant improvement in pain intensity and QOL in this cohort of LBP patients was noted during treatment with the lidocaine patch 5%. Controlled clinical trials are warranted.     

An English and Spanish Pediatric Asthma Symptom Scale

BACKGROUND: Pediatric asthma survey measures have not been adequately tested in non-English-speaking populations. OBJECTIVES: To test the reliability and validity of an English and Spanish symptom scale to measure asthma control in children. SUBJECTS: Parents (54% Spanish-speaking; 61% not high school graduates) of 234 children seen in the emergency department for an asthma exacerbation. MEASURES: Parent report of frequency and perceived severity of child asthma symptoms during the beginning and after resolution of the exacerbation. RESULTS: An 8-item scale composed of reports of cough, wheezing, shortness of breath, asthma attacks, chest pain, night symptoms, and overall perceived severity had very good psychometric properties in both English and Spanish. The reliability (Cronbach's alpha) of the scale ranged from 0.81 to 0.87 for both languages and time frames. In both languages, the validity of the scale was supported by responsiveness to changes in clinical status (lower symptom score after resolution of the exacerbation, P < 0.001) and by moderate to strong correlations (P < 0.001) with other asthma morbidity measures (parent report of child bother: r = 0.59-0.65; school days lost: r = 0.38-0.67; and activity days lost: r = 0.41-0.59). There were no statistically significant differences in the reliability or construct validity of the summary symptom scale by language, although Spanish speakers reported a lower frequency of some symptoms than did English speakers. CONCLUSIONS: A reliable and valid 8-item scale can be used to measure control of asthma symptoms in Spanish-speaking populations of low literacy. Additional research to evaluate language equivalency of asthma measures is necessary.     

Abdominal surgery, pain and anxiety: preoperative nursing intervention

AIM: This paper reports a study examining the effects of preoperative nursing intervention for pain on abdominal surgery preoperative anxiety and attitude to pain, and postoperative pain. METHOD: In a randomized controlled study conducted between January and August 2001, patients undergoing abdominal surgery in a medical center in southern Taiwan were randomly assigned to an experimental (n = 32) or control group (n = 30). The experimental group received routine care and preoperative nursing intervention for pain, while the control group received routine care only. A structured questionnaire including an anxiety scale, pain attitude scale, and Brief Pain Inventory was used to assess the results. RESULTS: Participants in the experimental group experienced a significant decrease in preoperative anxiety and a significant improvement in preoperative pain attitude. They also had statistically significantly lower postoperative pain intensity for 4 hours after surgery and lower highest pain intensity within the first 24 hours after surgery. Perceived pain interference during position changes, deep breathing/coughing, and moments of emotion in the experimental group was statistically significantly lower than that of the control group in the same situations. The experimental group also started out-of-bed activities 1.5 days earlier. CONCLUSION: Preoperative nursing intervention for pain has positive effects for patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The intervention used in this study could serve as a guide for nurses to improve the pain care of these patients.     

Psychometric evaluation of the Spanish and English versions of the spiritual coping strategies scale

The Spiritual Coping Strategies (SCS) Scale measures how frequently religious and nonreligious (spiritual) coping strategies are used to cope with a stressful experience. This study's purpose is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly translated Spanish version of the SCS. A total of 51 bilingual adults completed the SCS in Spanish and English, with 25 completing them again 2-3 weeks later. Internal consistency reliability for the Spanish (r = 0.83) and English (r = 0.82) versions of the SCS in the total sample were good. Test-retest reliability was .84 for the Spanish and .80 for the English version. Spanish and English responses to the SCS items and the resulting score for the subscales and the total scale were not significantly different. Scores on the English and Spanish versions were correlated as expected with time since the stressful event and happiness with family and with spouse or partner, supporting the validity of the Spanish SCS. Study findings support the reliability and validity of the newly translated Spanish SCS.     

Validation of the Malay Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire to measure cancer pain

The original version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) was translated into a Malay version by the standard procedure and was then evaluated for its psychometric properties. Of 119 eligible patients, a total of 113 (95%) agreed to participate in this study. Ages ranged from 18 to 76 years and interviews were conducted between August, 2004 and November, 2004. The pain intensity items demonstrated high loading with one factor, whereas the pain interference items were loaded on another factor. Two factors explained 62% of the variance. Compared to the Karnofsky Performance Scale, the pain intensity scales had a moderate negative (Pearson's) correlation (-0.520, P < 0.001) and the pain interference scales had a high negative correlation (-0.732, P < 0.001), showing good concurrent validity. The coefficient alpha of both subscales demonstrated good internal consistency of the items. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the test-retest stability was 0.61 for the pain intensity scale and 0.88 for the pain interference scale. The Malay version of the BPI is a reliable and valid instrument for cancer pain assessment and is comparable with the original version of the BPI in terms of structure and psychometric properties.