New insights into myosin evolution and classification

Myosins are eukaryotic actin-dependent molecular motors important for a broad range of functions like muscle contraction, vision, hearing, cell motility, and host cell invasion of apicomplexan parasites. Myosin heavy chains consist of distinct head, neck, and tail domains and have previously been categorized into 18 different classes based on phylogenetic analysis of their conserved heads. Here we describe a comprehensive phylogenetic examination of many previously unclassified myosins, with particular emphasis on sequences from apicomplexan and other chromalveolate protists including the model organism Toxoplasma, the malaria parasite Plasmodium, and the ciliate Tetrahymena. Using different phylogenetic inference methods and taking protein domain architectures, specific amino acid polymorphisms, and organismal distribution into account, we demonstrate a hitherto unrecognized common origin for ciliate and apicomplexan class XIV myosins. Our data also suggest common origins for some apicomplexan myosins and class VI, for classes II and XVIII, for classes XII and XV, and for some microsporidian myosins and class V, thereby reconciling evolutionary history and myosin structure in several cases and corroborating the common coevolution of myosin head, neck, and tail domains. Six novel myosin classes are established to accommodate sequences from chordate metazoans (class XIX), insects (class XX), kinetoplastids (class XXI), and apicomplexans and diatom algae (classes XXII, XXIII, and XXIV). These myosin (sub)classes include sequences with protein domains (FYVE, WW, UBA, ATS1-like, and WD40) previously unknown to be associated with myosin motors. Regarding the apicomplexan "myosome," we significantly update class XIV classification, propose a systematic naming convention, and discuss possible functions in these parasites.     

Chimeras of Dictyostelium myosin II head and neck domains with Acanthamoeba or chicken smooth muscle myosin II tail domain have greatly increased and unregulated actin-dependent MgATPase activity

Phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain of Dictyostelium myosin II increases V(max) of its actin-dependent MgATPase activity about 5-fold under normal assay conditions. Under these assay conditions, unphosphorylated chimeric myosins in which the tail domain of the Dictyostelium myosin II heavy chain is replaced by either the tail domain of chicken gizzard smooth muscle or Acanthamoeba myosin II are 20 times more active because of a 10- to 15-fold increase in V(max) and a 2- to 7-fold decrease in apparent K(ATPase) and are only slightly activated by regulatory light chain phosphorylation. Actin-dependent MgATPase activity of the Dictyostelium/Acanthamoeba chimera is not affected by phosphorylation of serine residues in the tail whose phosphorylation completely inactivates wild-type Acanthamoeba myosin II. These results indicate that the actin-dependent MgATPase activity of these myosins involves specific, tightly coupled, interactions between head and tail domains.     

Molecular evolution of the myosin family: relationships derived from comparisons of amino acid sequences.

To examine the evolutionary relationships between members of the myosin family, we have used two different phylogenetic methods, distance matrix and maximum parsimony, to analyze all available myosin head sequences. We find that there are at least three equally divergent classes of myosin, demonstrating that the current classification of myosin into only two classes needs to be reexamined. In the myosin II class, smooth muscle myosin is more closely related to nonmuscle myosin than to striated muscle myosin, implying that smooth muscle and skeletal muscle myosins were independently derived from nonmuscle myosin and suggesting that similarities between these types of muscle are the result of convergent evolution. The grouping of head sequences produced by phylogenetic analysis is consistent with classifications based on enzymology and structural localization and is generally consistent with grouping based on common tail structure elements. This result demonstrates that specific head sequences are tightly coupled to specific tail sequences throughout evolution and challenges the idea that myosin heads are freely interchangeable units whose unique function is determined only by the tail structure to which it is attached.     

The neck region of the myosin motor domain acts as a lever arm to generate movement.

The myosin head consists of a globular catalytic domain that binds actin and hydrolyzes ATP and a neck domain that consists of essential and regulatory light chains bound to a long alpha-helical portion of the heavy chain. The swinging neck-level model assumes that a swinging motion of the neck relative to the catalytic domain is the origin of movement. This model predicts that the step size, and consequently the sliding velocity, are linearly related to the length of the neck. We have tested this point by characterizing a series of mutant Dictyostelium myosins that have different neck lengths. The 2xELCBS mutant has an extra binding site for essential light chain. The delta RLCBS mutant myosin has an internal deletion that removes the regulatory light chain binding site. The delta BLCBS mutant lacks both light chain binding sites. Wild-type myosin and these mutant myosins were subjected to the sliding filament in vitro motility assay. As expected, mutants with shorter necks move slower than wild-type myosin in vitro. Most significantly, a mutant with a longer neck moves faster than the wild type, and the sliding velocities of these myosins are linearly related to the neck length, as predicted by the swinging neck-lever model. A simple extrapolation to zero speed predicts that the fulcrum point is in the vicinity of the SH1-SH2 region in the catalytic domain.     

Conserved protein domains in a myosin heavy chain gene from Dictyostelium discoideum.

The 2116-amino acid myosin heavy chain sequence from Dictyostelium discoideum was determined from DNA sequence analysis of the cloned gene. The gene product can be divided into two distinct regions, a globular head region and a long alpha-helical, rod-like tail. In comparisons with nematode and mammalian muscle myosins, specific areas of the head region are highly conserved. These areas presumably reflect conserved functional and structural domains. Certain features that are present in the head region of nematode and mammalian muscle myosins, and that have been assumed to be important for myosin function, are missing in the Dictyostelium myosin sequence. The protein sequence of the Dictyostelium tail region is very poorly conserved with respect to the other myosins but displays the periodicities similar to those of muscle myosins. These periodicities are believed to play a role in filament formation. The 196-residue repeating unit that determines the 14.3-nm repeat seen in muscle thick filaments, the 28-residue charge repeating unit, and the 1,4 hydrophobic repeat previously described for the nematode myosin are all present in the Dictyostelium myosin rod sequence, suggesting that the filament structures of muscle and Dictyostelium myosins must be similar.     

Isolation of the regulatory domain of scallop myosin: role of the essential light chain in calcium binding.

The regulatory domain of scallop myosin, consisting of a regulatory light chain (R-LC), an essential light chain (E-LC), and a portion of heavy chain, occupies the neck region of myosin. This domain is directly involved in the regulation of molluscan muscle contraction, which is triggered by direct Ca2+ binding to myosin. We have isolated a soluble functional complex (regulatory complex) comprised of R-LC, E-LC, and a 10-kDa heavy chain fragment in a 1:1:1 stoichiometry by clostripain digestion of the myosin head (papain subfragment 1). N termini of the heavy chain fragments were either leucine-812 or valine-817. The isolated complex retained the specific Ca2(+)-binding site and bound Ca2+ with a similar affinity and selectivity as myosin. The individual components of the regulatory complex were isolated after complete denaturation with guanidine hydrochloride. The regulatory complex was reconstituted from isolated light chains and the heavy chain fragment. The renatured complex regained Ca2+ binding quantitatively. To elucidate the function of the E-LC in Ca2+ binding, we constructed hybrid regulatory complexes. The hybrid complexes reconstituted with molluscan E-LC and R-LC regained the specific Ca2(+)-binding site, whereas the hybrid complex formed with rabbit skeletal E-LC [alkali LC 2 (A2-LC)] and scallop R-LC did not. The results demonstrate that E-LCs from myosins regulated by direct Ca2+ binding are required for the specific Ca2+ binding in the molluscan muscle.     

Subdomain organization of the Acanthamoeba myosin IC tail from cryo-electron microscopy

Acanthamoeba myosin IC (AMIC) is a single-headed myosin comprised of one heavy chain (129 kDa) and one light chain (17 kDa). The heavy chain has head, neck (light chain-binding), and tail domains. The tail consists of four subdomains: a basic region (BR) (23 kDa) and two Gly/Pro/Ala-rich (GPA) regions, GPA1 (6 kDa) and GPA2 (15 kDa), flanking an Src homology 3 region (6 kDa). Although the AMIC head is similar in sequence, structure, and function (ATPase motor) to other myosin heads, the organization of the tail has been less clear as has its function beyond an assumed role in binding interaction partners, e.g., the BR has a membrane affinity and the GPA components bind F-actin in an ATP-independent manner. To investigate the spatial arrangement of subdomains in the tail, we have used cryo-electron microscopy and image reconstruction to compare actin filaments decorated with WT AMIC and tail-truncated mutants of various lengths. The BR forms an oval-shaped feature, approximately 40 A long, that diverges obliquely from the head, extending azimuthally around the actin filament and toward its barbed end. GPA2 and GPA1 are located together on the inner (actin-proximal) side of the tail, close enough to act in concert in binding the same or another actin filament. The outer face of the BR is strategically exposed for membrane or vesicle binding.     

The motor domain and the regulatory domain of myosin solely dictate enzymatic activity and phosphorylation-dependent regulation, respectively

While the structures of skeletal and smooth muscle myosins are homologous, they differ functionally from each other in several respects, i.e., motor activities and regulation. To investigate the molecular basis for these differences, we have produced a skeletal/smooth chimeric myosin molecule and analyzed the motor activities and regulation of this myosin. The produced chimeric myosin is composed of the globular motor domain of skeletal muscle myosin (Met¹–Gly⁷⁷³) and the C-terminal long α-helix domain of myosin subfragment 1 as well as myosin subfragment 2 (Gly⁷⁷³–Ser¹¹⁰⁴) and light chains of smooth muscle myosin. Both the actin-activated ATPase activity and the actin-translocating activity of the chimeric myosin were completely regulated by light chain phosphorylation. On the other hand, the maximum actin-activated ATPase activity of the chimeric myosin was the same as skeletal myosin and thus much higher than smooth myosin. These results show that the C-terminal light chain-associated domain of myosin head solely confers regulation by light chain phosphorylation, whereas the motor domain determines the rate of ATP hydrolysis. This is the first report, to our knowledge, that directly determines the function of the two structurally separated domains in myosin head.     

Fractionation and characterization of two molecular variants of myosin from adult human atrium

Monoclonal antibodies (MAb) to myosin heavy chains were prepared from one adult human ventricular myocardium. Several of these MAb reacted by indirect immunofluorescence in a heterogenous way on cryostat transverse sections of fibers from human atrial myocardium, suggesting the presence of different forms of myosin within the human atrium and prompting the further use of the MAb to attempt to fractionate preparations of native atrial myosins. Two molecular variants of human atrial myosins or myosin fragments were thus separated by immunoaffinity chromatography performed with one antiventricular myosin MAb. Seven MAb located at different positions along the myosin heavy chains, as deduced from blotting and immuno-electron microscopy experiments, were used to characterize the structural relationships between the separated human atrial isomyosins and between each of them and the main human ventricular myosin. As deduced from competitive radioimmunoassay measurements, the primary structures of the two atrial myosins differ in at least five antigenic determinants and share at least two of them; similarly located structural differences were observed between one of the atrial myosins and the ventricular myosin. Conversely, the primary structures of the other atrial myosin and of the ventricular myosin differ in at least two antigenic determinants and share at least five of them. Differences in the primary structures of the human cardiac myosins were confirmed by analysis of the peptides produced by limited enzymatic digestion of the heavy chains; a few peptide differences were consistently found. To summarize the two separated forms of atrial myosin have different heavy chains, but they have similar if not identical in vitro ATPase activities and the same light chains. One of the atrial myosins is immunologically close to the ventricular myosin, but they each differ with respect to their heavy chains, light chains, and enzymatic activities.     

Regulation of the filament structure and assembly of Acanthamoeba myosin II by phosphorylation of serines in the heavy-chain nonhelical tailpiece

Significance

Class II myosins are the only members of this superfamily of actin-associated molecular motors that form antiparallel bipolar filaments, which are essential for the biological functions of these myosins. Here we show that the assembly of Acanthamoeba myosin II monomers into minifilaments is modified by phosphorylation of one or more of four serine residues in the 27-residue nonhelical tailpiece at the end of each of the two heavy chains that form the coiled-coil helix characteristic of class II myosins. This regulatory mechanism might be applicable to other class II myosins that have a nonhelical tailpiece.     

The heavy chain of Acanthamoeba myosin IB is a fusion of myosin-like and non-myosin-like sequences.

Acanthamoeba castellanii myosins IA and IB demonstrate the catalytic properties of a myosin and can support analogues of contractile and motile activity in vitro, but their single, low molecular weight heavy chains, roughly globular shapes, and inabilities to self-assemble into filaments make them structurally atypical myosins. We now present the complete amino acid sequence of the 128-kDa myosin IB heavy chain, which we deduced from the nucleotide sequence of the gene and which reveals that the polypeptide is a fusion of myosin-like and non-myosin-like sequences. Specifically, the amino-terminal approximately 76 kDa of amino acid sequence is highly similar to the globular head sequences of conventional myosins. By contrast, the remaining approximately 51 kDa of sequence shows no similarity to any portion of conventional myosin sequences, contains regions that are rich in glycine, proline, and alanine residues, and lacks the distinctive sequence characteristics of an alpha-helical, coiled-coil structure. We conclude, therefore, that the protein is composed of a myosin globular head fused not to the typical coiled-coil rod-like myosin tail structure but rather to an unusual carboxyl-terminal domain. These results support the conclusion that filamentous myosin is not required for force generation and provide a further perspective on the structural requirements for myosin function. Finally, we find a striking conservation of intron/exon structure between this gene and a vertebrate muscle myosin gene. We discuss this observation in relation to the evolutionary origin of the myosin IB gene and the antiquity of myosin gene intron/exon structure.     

From flies' eyes to our ears: mutations in a human class III myosin cause progressive nonsyndromic hearing loss DFNB30

Normal vision in Drosophila requires NINAC, a class III myosin. Class III myosins are hybrid motor-signaling molecules, with an N-terminal kinase domain, highly conserved head and neck domains, and a class III-specific tail domain. In Drosophila rhabdomeres, NINAC interacts with actin filaments and with a PDZ scaffolding protein to organize the phototransduction machinery into a signaling complex. Recessive null mutations in Drosophila NINAC delay termination of the photoreceptor response and lead to progressive retinal degeneration. Here, we show that normal hearing in humans requires myosin IIIA, the human homolog of NINAC. In an extended Israeli family, nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss is caused by three different recessive, loss-of-function mutations in myosin IIIA. Of 18 affected relatives in Family N, 7 are homozygous and 11 are compound heterozygous for pairs of mutant alleles. Expression of mammalian myosin IIIA is highly restricted, with the strongest expression in retina and cochlea. The involvement of homologous class III myosins in both Drosophila vision and human hearing is an evolutionary link between these sensory systems.     

Dictyostelium discoideum contains a gene encoding a myosin I heavy chain.

We have cloned and completely sequenced a gene encoding the heavy chain of Dictyostelium myosin I. Like the myosin I molecules from Acanthamoeba, the Dictyostelium myosin I heavy chain is composed of a globular head domain fused to a 45-kDa glycine-, proline-, and alanine-rich carboxyl-terminal domain, rather than the coiled-coil rod domain of conventional myosins. Comparisons of the Dictyostelium myosin I heavy-chain amino acid sequence with those of the Acanthamoeba myosins I reveal that they are highly similar throughout, including the unconventional carboxyl-terminal domains. The Dictyostelium myosin I gene is expressed in growing cells as a 3600-nucleotide mRNA. Measurements of the steady-state level of this mRNA at different times during starvation-induced aggregation and development are consistent with a role for myosin I in chemotaxis and aggregation. Generation of Dictyostelium cells lacking myosin I by gene disruption and/or antisense RNA production should provide a way to test directly the role of this nonfilamentous myosin in cell motility. These experiments will be simplified by the fact that Southern blot analyses of Dictyostelium genomic DNA are consistent with there being a single myosin I heavy-chain gene.     

Differences among myosins synthesized in non-myogenic cells, presumptive myoblasts, and myoblasts.

Myosins synthesized in non-myogenic cells and replicating presumptive myoblasts differ from those synthesized in postmitotic mononucleated myoblasts and myotubes. Myoblasts and myotubes synthesize the definitive light chains, MLC1 and MLC2. These light chains display different molecular weights in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels from the fibroblast light chains FLC1 and FLC2 synthesized in non-myogenic cells and presumptive myoblasts. There are immunological differences between the myosin heavy chains synthesized in myoblasts and myotubes and those synthesized in non-myogenic cells and presumptive myoblasts. Fluorescein-labeled antibodies against skeletal light meromyosin are bound only along the lateral edges of emerging and definitive A-bands. This antibody to light meromyosin is not bound to the outside of, or the microfilaments subtending, the plasma membrane in non-myogenic cells or in myoblasts or in myotubes. These findings suggest that: (1) non-myogenic cells and replicating presumptive myoblasts synthesize similar myosin heavy and light chains; (2) replicating presumptive myoblasts synthesize a different set of myosins from those synthesized by their postmitotic daughters, the myoblasts; (3) the myosins associated with the plasma membranes of non-myogenic and myogenic cells are products of structural genes distinct from those coding for the myosins for skeletal myofibrils.     

Rod phosphorylation favors folding in a catch muscle myosin.

Myosin from a molluscan catch muscle is unusual in being phosphorylated in the rod by an endogenous heavy chain kinase. The overall structure of the molecule resembles that of other muscle myosins, although the tail is somewhat longer (approximately equal to 1700 A). At low ionic strength the unphosphorylated molecules associate in filaments that display a striking axial repeat of 145 A. Phosphorylation of the rod enhances myosin solubility in the range of NaCl between 0.05 and 0.15 M. Depending on the ionic strength and the counterions present, the soluble species corresponds to an antiparallel folded dimer (15 S) or to a folded monomer (10 S). Unphosphorylated myosin can also be partially solubilized into folded monomers by addition of ATP in 0.15 M NaCl. A similar molecular folding has also been observed in smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosins that depends, however, on the state of phosphorylation of the light chains in the myosin head. We discuss these results in relation to possible mechanisms for control of catch contraction.     

Conservation of the regulated structure of folded myosin 2 in species separated by at least 600 million years of independent evolution

The myosin 2 family of molecular motors includes isoforms regulated in different ways. Vertebrate smooth-muscle myosin is activated by phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain, whereas scallop striated adductor-muscle myosin is activated by direct calcium binding to its essential light chain. The paired heads of inhibited molecules from myosins regulated by phosphorylation have an asymmetric arrangement with motor-motor interactions. It was unknown whether such interactions were a common motif for inactivation used in other forms of myosin-linked regulation. Using electron microscopy and single-particle image processing, we show that indistinguishable structures are indeed found in myosins and heavy meromyosins isolated from scallop striated adductor muscle and turkey gizzard smooth muscle. The similarities extend beyond the shapes of the heads and interactions between them: In both myosins, the tail folds into three segments, apparently at identical sites; all three segments are in close association outside the head region; and two segments are associated in the same way with one head in the asymmetric arrangement. Thus, these organisms, which have different regulatory mechanisms and diverged from a common ancestor >600 Myr ago, have the same quaternary structure. Conservation across such a large evolutionary distance suggests that this conformation is of fundamental functional importance.     

Three-dimensional image reconstruction of dephosphorylated smooth muscle heavy meromyosin reveals asymmetry in the interaction between myosin heads and placement of subfragment 2

Regulation of the actin-activated ATPase of smooth muscle myosin II is known to involve an interaction between the two heads that is controlled by phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain. However, the three-dimensional structure of this inactivated form has been unknown. We have used a lipid monolayer to obtain two-dimensional crystalline arrays of the unphosphorylated inactive form of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin suitable for structural studies by electron cryomicroscopy of unstained, frozen-hydrated specimens. The three-dimensional structure reveals an asymmetric interaction between the two myosin heads. The ATPase activity of one head is sterically "blocked" because part of its actin-binding interface is positioned onto the converter domain of the second head. ATPase activity of the second head, which can bind actin, appears to be inhibited through stabilization of converter domain movements needed to release phosphate and achieve strong actin binding. When the subfragment 2 domain of heavy meromyosin is oriented as it would be in an actomyosin filament lattice, the position of the heads is very different from that needed to bind actin, suggesting an additional contribution to ATPase inhibition in situ.     

Filament structure as an essential factor for regulation of Dictyostelium myosin by regulatory light chain phosphorylation

Phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain (RLC) activates the actin-dependent ATPase activity of Dictyostelium myosin II. To elucidate this regulatory mechanism, we characterized two mutant myosins, MyΔC1225 and MyΔC1528, which are truncated at Ala-1224 and Ser-1527, respectively. These mutant myosins do not contain the C-terminal assembly domain and thus are unable to form filaments. Their activities were only weakly regulated by RLC phosphorylation, suggesting that, unlike smooth muscle myosin, efficient regulation of Dictyostelium myosin II requires filament assembly. Consistent with this hypothesis, wild-type myosin progressively lost the regulation as its concentration in the assay mixture was decreased. Dephosphorylated RLC did not inhibit the activity when the concentration of myosin in the reaction mixture was very low. Furthermore, 3xAsp myosin, which does not assemble efficiently due to point mutations in the tail, also was less well regulated than the wild-type. We conclude that the activity in the monomer state is exempt from inhibition by the dephosphorylated RLC and that the complete regulatory switch is formed only in the filament structure. Interestingly, a chimeric myosin composed of Dictyostelium heavy meromyosin fused to chicken skeletal light meromyosin was not well regulated by RLC phosphorylation. This suggests that, in addition to filament assembly, some specific feature of the filament structure is required for efficient regulation.     

Role of the lever arm in the processive stepping of myosin V

Myosin V is a two-headed molecular motor that binds six light chains per heavy chain, which creates unusually long lever arms. This motor moves processively along its actin track in discrete 36-nm steps. Our model is that one head of the two-headed myosin V tightly binds to actin and swings its long lever arm through a large angle, providing a stroke. We created single-headed constructs with different-size lever arms and show that stroke size is proportional to lever arm length. In a two-headed molecule, the stroke provides the directional bias, after which the unbound head diffuses to find its binding site, 36 nm forward. Our two-headed construct with all six light chains per head reconstitutes the 36-nm processive step seen in tissue-purified myosin V. Two-headed myosin V molecules with only four light chains per head are still processive, but their step size is reduced to 24 nm. A further reduction in the length of the lever arms to one light chain per head results in a motor that is unable to walk processively. This motor produces single small approximately 6-nm strokes, and ATPase and pyrene actin quench measurements show that only one of the heads of this dimer rapidly binds to actin for a given binding event. These data show that for myosin V with its normal proximal tail domain, both heads and a long lever arm are required for large, processive steps.