Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotropin in the late follicular phase during ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of exogenous LH in the late follicular phase on ongoing pregnancies and at the different stages of IVF-ET (stimulation, fertilization, and implantation) in patients with low endogenous LH. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with modeling of the different phases of IVF-ET. SETTING: IVF center of the teaching hospital in Bordeaux, France. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing IVF and ICSI treatment. INTERVENTION(S): One group received recombinant FSH alone (FSH group) and the other received recombinant FSH and hMG in the late follicular phase (i.e., when the largest follicle reached 14 mm) (FSH/hMG group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy, number of oocytes, and number of embryos.RESULT(S): The FSH/hMG group had a higher probability of having at least one oocyte (odds ratio [OR] = 2.75 [1.11-6.80]), of having at least one embryo after oocyte retrieval (OR = 2.84 [1.33-6.07]), and of ongoing pregnancy after ET (OR = 2.04 [0.83-5.01]), and globally had a higher probability of ongoing pregnancy (OR = 2.83 [1.19-6.71]). CONCLUSION(S): In ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET, LH supplementation in the late follicular phase of women with low endogenous LH is beneficial for ongoing pregnancy by increasing the rate of success of all stages of the treatment.     

Effectiveness of human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive cycles: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of hMG and recombinant FSH after down-regulation for ovulation stimulation in assisted reproductive cycles. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. SETTING: Infertility centers providing assisted reproductive techniques. PATIENT(S): Two thousand thirty women undergoing IVF or ICSI. INTERVENTIONS: Ovarian hyperstimulation with hMG or recombinant FSH after down-regulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate, gonadotropin dose used, oocytes retrieved, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and multiple pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): Six randomized controlled trials were included. In all trials, the group of women treated with hMG had higher pregnancy rates. Pooling the five trials that used a long GnRH agonist protocol resulted in a higher clinical pregnancy rate for hMG compared with recombinant FSH (relative risk, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.44]). However, there was no evidence of a difference in rates of ongoing pregnancy or live birth per woman between hMG recipients and recombinant FSH recipients (relative risk, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.99 to 1.45]). No differences were found in gonadotropin dose used, oocytes retrieved, miscarriage rate, or multiple pregnancy rate. CONCLUSION(S): Use of hMG resulted in higher clinical pregnancy rates than did use of recombinant FSH in IVF/ICSI cycles after GnRH agonist down-regulation in a long protocol.     

GnRH antagonist in older IVF patients. Retrieval rates and clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the use of a midcycle GnRH antagonist provides better clinical outcomes and lower cancellation rates in in vitro fertilization (IVF). STUDY DESIGN: We examined all patients older than 40 years undergoing IVF-embryo transfer cycles between January 1999 and December 2000. Prior to June 2000, controlled ovarian stimulation in women > or = 40 years was performed with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)/human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) only and no GnRH agonist or antagonist (group I). After June 2000, following the release of Ganirelix in the U.S., all women > or = 40 years were stimulated with FSH/hMG + Ganirelix (group II). Outcomes of IVF cycles prior to Ganirelix were compared to results after its introduction. RESULTS: Cancellation rates were significantly lower in group II (16%) as compared to group I (67%) (P < .05). In patients with oocytes retrieved, group II had a significantly higher number of recovered oocytes (7.7 +/- 0.8 vs. 5.3 +/- 0.7, P < .05). However, the number of embryos transferred, cumulative embryo scores, implantation rates and ongoing pregnancy rates did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: Although our results are preliminary, the addition of GnRH antagonist avoids ovarian suppression at the start of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and prevents the premature LH surge at midcycle. Thus, more patients attempting IVF undergo oocyte retrieval, although clinical outcomes may not necessarily be improved.     

Economic evaluation of highly purified menotropin compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in assisted reproduction

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost of achieving pregnancy with different gonadotropin preparations. DESIGN: Cost-minimization analysis of a prospective randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Twenty-two centers in six countries. PATIENT(S): Women 18 to 36 years of age with infertility for more than 1 year who were undergoing IVF or ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): Highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH. RESULT(S): Mean cost of achieving an ongoing pregnancy.The mean cost per patient treatment cycle was estimated to be pound 2423 with highly purified hMG (95% CI, pound 2356 to pound 2495) and pound 2745 with recombinant FSH (95% CI, pound 2658 to pound 2830). The ongoing pregnancy rate was 22% with highly purified hMG and 19% with recombinant FSH. The cost per ongoing pregnancy was pound 10781 with highly purified hMG (95% CI, pound 9056 to pound 12919) and pound 14284 with recombinant FSH (95% CI, pound 11883 to pound 17891). CONCLUSION(S): Highly purified hMG and recombinant FSH are equally effective, but highly purified hMG is less expensive per cycle. Using highly purified hMG instead of recombinant FSH would translate into a 13% increase in the number of cycles that could be offered.     

A randomized prospective trial comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist/recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) versus GnRH-agonist/rFSH in women pretreated with oral contraceptives before in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of oral contraceptive (OC) pill pretreatment in recombinant FSH/GnRH-antagonist versus recombinant FSH/GnRH-agonist stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients, and to evaluate optimization of retrieval day. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study. SETTING: Private practice and university centers. PATIENT(S): Eighty patients undergoing IVF who met the appropriate inclusion criteria. INTERVENTION(S): Four study centers recruited 80 patients. The OC regimen began on cycle days 2 to 4 and was discontinued on a Sunday after 14 to 28 days. The recombinant FSH regimen was begun on the following Friday. The GnRH-agonist group was treated with a long protocol; the GnRH-antagonist was initiated when the lead follicle reached 12 to 14 mm. When two follicles had reached 16 to 18 mm, hCG was administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measures were the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes, day of the week for oocyte retrieval, and total dose and days of stimulation of recombinant FSH. Secondary efficacy variables included pregnancy and implantation rate; serum E(2) levels on stimulation day 1; serum E(2), P, and LH levels on the day of hCG administration; follicle size on day 6 and day of hCG administration; the total days of GnRH-analogue treatment; total days on OC; total days from end of OC to oocyte retrieval; and the cycle cancellation rate. RESULT(S): Patient outcomes were similar for the days of stimulation, total dose of gonadotropin used, two-pronuclei embryos, pregnancy (44.4% GnRH-antagonist vs. 45.0% GnRH-agonist, P=.86) and implantation rates (22.2% GnRH-antagonist vs. 26.4% GnRH-agonist, P=.71). Oral contraceptive cycle scheduling resulted in 78% and 90% of retrievals performed Monday through Friday for GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist. A one day delay in OC discontinuation and recombinant FSH start would result in over 90% of oocyte retrievals occurring Monday through Friday in both groups. CONCLUSION(S): The OC pretreatment in recombinant FSH/GnRH-antagonist protocols provides a patient-friendly regimen and can be optimized for weekday retrievals. No difference was seen in number of 2PN embryos, cryopreserved embryos, embryos transferred, implantation and pregnancy rates between the two stimulation protocols.     

Comparison of stimulation with clomiphene citrate in combination with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone to stimulation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol: a prospective,randomized study

OBJECTIVE: To compare IVF-ET outcome with a new stimulation protocol using clomiphene citrate (CC) with recombinant FSH and LH to stimulation with the standard long GnRH-a protocol. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Outpatient infertility clinic in Vienna, Austria. PATIENT(S): Two hundred ninety-four infertile women undergoing IVF-ET; 154 IVF cycles stimulated with CC + recombinant FSH + recombinant LH (group A) and 140 cycles with long GnRH-a suppression + recombinant FSH (group B). INTERVENTION(S): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, egg retrieval, and ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cycle parameters (number of oocytes, fertilization, number of embryos) and outcome (pregnancy rate, cancellation rate, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [OHSS]). RESULT(S): Pregnancy rate per ET was 42.9% (implantation rate, 21.3%) in group A and 36.6% (17.4%) in group B. Cancellation rates were similar. The OHSS occurred in four cases (3%) in group A and 12 cases (10%) in group B. CONCLUSION(S): Stimulation with CC + recombinant FSH + recombinant LH leads to comparable pregnancy rates vs. the long protocol. With this new stimulation, less gonadotropins are used and there is less need for monitoring (lower cost for patient and clinic). The risk of OHSS is reduced as well. Therefore, this protocol should be regarded as the first-line treatment.     

Human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in normogonadotropic women down-regulated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist who were undergoing in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical and endocrinological effects of intranasal (IN) vs. subcutaneous (SC) GnRH-a for pituitary down-regulation combined with hMG vs. rFSH. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: University hospital, IVF unit. PATIENT(S): Three hundred seventy-nine normogonadotropic women eligible for IVF or ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): Randomization to intranasal (IN) or SC GnRH-a and to hMG or rFSH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Oocytes retrieved, embryos developed, clinical pregnancy, and delivery rates. Serum hormone concentrations on stimulation days 1 (S1) and 8 (S8), and oocyte pick-up (OPU) day. RESULT(S): After randomization, four groups were formed: IN/hMG (n = 100), IN/FSH (n = 98), SC/hMG (n = 89), and SC/FSH (n = 92). Mean number of oocytes retrieved and of transferable and transferred embryos were similar in the four groups. Clinical pregnancy rate per started cycle was significantly higher in the IN/HMG group than in the SC/FSH group (P<.05) and was intermediate in the two remaining groups. Se-LH on S8 in the two SC groups was significantly lower than in the two IN groups. Se-E2 on S8 in the SC/FSH group was significantly lower than in the other three groups. CONCLUSION(S): The clinical and endocrinological outcome in IVF and ICSI-treated normogonadotropic women is significantly influenced by mode of down-regulation as well as gonadotropin formulation.     

Absence of corpus luteum rescue by chorionic gonadotropin in women immunized with a contraceptive vaccine

OBJECTIVE: To investigate possible differences between using recombinant FSH (rFSH) and hMG for ovarian stimulation in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. DESIGN: Parallel group design. Prospective, randomized clinical study. SETTING: A tertiary care infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): A total of 578 patients of our IVF/ICSI routine were recruited. INTERVENTION(S): Treatment with hMG was used for 282 patients (282 cycles), whereas 296 patients (296 cycles) were treated with rFSH. The number of cycles leading to an embryo transfer were 248 and 259, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary: treatment days, total dose of gonadotropin administered, number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes, and embryo quality. RESULT(S):Of the cycles with embryo transfer, the pregnancy rates were 30.1% and 32.3% in the rFSH and the hMG groups, respectively. This difference is not statistically significant (P=0.798). Treatment with rFSH resulted in a significantly higher number of recovered oocytes compared with the hMG group but was also associated with a higher number of ampoules needed to reach the criterion for hCG administration. No significant differences were found with regard to the number of mature oocytes, the number of treatment days, and the embryo quality. CONCLUSION(S): In terms of the clinical pregnancy rate, no significant differences between the two stimulation regimens can be stated.     

Efficacy of a combined protocol of urinary and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone used for ovarian stimulation of patients undergoing ICSI cycle

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of using both urinary and recombinant FSH in a combined protocol for ovarian stimulation in an IVF treatment program. Method A total of 119 infertile couples undergoing ICSI treatment were randomized prospectively in this study. After a standard down-regulation with GnRH analogue, the patients were randomized in 2 groups 58 received combined urinary and recombinant FSH, starting with uFSH and then rFSH, and 61 controls received only recombinant FSH. Result(s) Pregnancy and implantation rates were significantly higher in the combined uFSH/rFSH group than the control (rFSH) group (43.9% vs 22.1% and 27.5% vs 13.2% respectively). Metaphase II oocyte and grade 1 embryos were significantly higher in favour of combined uFSH/rFSH group than the recombinant FSH group. Conclusion(s) This study shows that using a combination of both urinary and recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation improves oocyte maturity and embryo cleavage, and increases pregnancy and implantation rates.     

IVF-ET周期中GnRH-a、FSH、hMG配伍方案的比较研究

目的:探讨IVF周期中采用不同促排卵方案时,卵泡液及血清中FSH、LH、E2水平的变化及对胚胎发育、受精、妊娠的影响;单用国产hMG促排卵的效果。方法:120例分成4组。测定卵泡液及取卵日血清中FSH、LH、E2水平,比较四种方案的取卵数、受精率、Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级胚胎形成率和每移植周期妊娠率。结果:四种促排卵方案的卵泡液和血清FSH、E2水平没有差别（P>0.05）,不同垂体降调节者,卵泡液和血清LH水平明显升高（P<0.0001）,四种促排卵方案的取卵数、受精率、优质胚胎形成率、移植周期妊娠率经统计学处理均无显著性差异。结论:卵泡液和血清中LH水平升高可能与应用垂体降调节有关,而与选择纯FSH还是hMG促排卵无关。轻度LH升高并不影响卵泡发育、卵子质量和以后的胚胎发育。IVF周期首选垂体降调节加FSH或FSH/hMG促排卵方案,单用hMG促排卵也可以作为选择。     

Follicle-stimulating hormone or human menopausal gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization cycles: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To reanalyze the results of using FSH alone and hMG during IVF treatment, taking into account the different protocols of administration of superactive GnRH agonist analogs. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. SETTING: The London Women's Clinic. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing IVF treatment. INTERVENTION(S): A meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials from 1985 to 1999 of the use of FSH versus hMG for ovarian stimulation during IVF treatment. The common Peto odds ratio was calculated with use of a fixed effect model. The overall log odds ratio was estimated after demonstrating the consistency or homogeneity of the study results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate per cycle of IVF. RESULT(S): The results suggested that in the "long and short GnRH agonists protocol" of IVF, FSH, and hMG were equally effective in achieving ovarian stimulation, and there were no differences in the clinical pregnancy rates per cycle of IVF. However, in protocols where no pituitary desensitization was used, FSH alone was more efficacious. CONCLUSION(S): The optimum choice of gonadotropin preparation for ovarian stimulation during IVF treatment is influenced by the regimen of pituitary desensitization used. The optimum gonadotropin to be used when GnRH antagonists are used has yet to be determined.     

Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone,gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists,and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH, GnRH antagonists, and hCG on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): Fifty-five women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). INTERVENTION(S): [1] Ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH, starting on day 2 of the cycle and GnRH antagonist, starting after a median of 6 days of recombinant FSH stimulation (range, 5-12 days); [2] hCG administration for ovulation induction; and [3] aspirational biopsy of endometrium at oocyte pick-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Endometrial histology at oocyte pick-up by Noyes criteria. RESULT(S): Advancement of endometrial maturation (2.5 +/- 0.1 days) as compared to the expected chronological date was observed in all antagonist cycles at oocyte retrieval. Endometrial advancement at oocyte pick-up increased in line with values of LH at initiation of stimulation and the duration of recombinant FSH treatment before the antagonist was started. CONCLUSION(S): The higher the values of LH at initiation of stimulation and the longer the duration of recombinant FSH treatment before the antagonist is started, the more advanced the endometrial maturation at oocyte pick-up.     

GnRH类似物－Buserelin在体外受精与胚胎移植超排卵（长方案）治疗中的作用

从１９９４年４月至１９９５年７月在体外受精与胚胎移植超排卵中，应用ＧｎＲＨ类似物－Ｂｕｓｅｒｅｌｉｎ及ＦＳＨ／ｈＭＧ长方案治疗９例（Ⅰ组）与单独用ＦＳＨ／ｈＭＧ１２例（Ⅱ组）进行比较。结果：Ⅰ组的ＦＳＨ／ｈＭＧ用量大，用药时间长，其受精率、卵裂率及妊娠数均高于Ⅱ组。卵巢过度刺激综合征（ＯＨＳＳ）发生率明显低于Ⅱ组。本文研究显示了Ｂｕｓｅｒｅｌｉｎ长方案治疗能明显提高体外受精与胚胎移植的效果。     

Effect of highly purified urinary follicle-stimulating hormone on oocyte and embryo quality

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of ovarian stimulation with highly purified urofollitropin on oocyte and embryo quality. DESIGN: Parallel randomized open-label clinical study. SETTING: Assisted reproduction centers. PATIENT(S): Two hundred sixty-seven infertile couples undergoing IVF/ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): All participants underwent standard down-regulation with GnRH analogue. One hundred thirty-three participants received highly purified urinary FSH and 134 controls received recombinant FSH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary end points were number of morphologically mature oocytes retrieved, embryo quality, and pregnancy and implantation rates. Secondary end points were: total number of days of FSH stimulation, total dose of gonadotropin administered, fertilization rate per number of retrieved oocytes, embryo cleavage rate, live birth and miscarriage rates, endometrial thickness and estradiol level on the day of hCG administration, cancellation rate, and incidence of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. RESULT(S): Pregnancy and implantation rates were nonsignificantly higher in the urinary FSH group than the recombinant FSH group (46.5% vs. 36.8% and 22.1% vs. 15.8%, respectively). The grade 1 embryo score was significantly higher in the urinary FSH group than the recombinant FSH (42.1% vs. 33.5%), and the live birth rate was nonsignificantly higher in the former group. CONCLUSION(S): Highly purified urinary FSH is as effective, efficient, and safe for clinical use as recombinant FSH.     

Prolongation of the follicular phase in in vitro fertilization results in a lower ongoing pregnancy rate in cycles stimulated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of altering the timing of hCG administration on ongoing pregnancy rates in patients stimulated with recombinant FSH (rec-FSH) and GnRH antagonists for IVF. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): Four hundred thirteen patients undergoing IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Rec-FSH stimulation starting on day 2 of the cycle combined with daily GnRH antagonist starting on day 6 of stimulation. Patients were randomized to receive 10000 IU of hCG either as soon as at least three follicles were >or=17 mm on ultrasound (early-hCG group, 208 patients) or 2 days later after this criterion was met (late-hCG group, 205 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): Fertilization rates and number and quality of embryos transferred did not differ between the two groups. However, a significantly lower ongoing pregnancy rate was present in the late-hCG as compared with the early-hCG group (25.0% vs. 35.6%, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): Prolongation of the follicular phase in patients stimulated with rec-FSH and GnRH antagonists for IVF does not affect oocyte or embryo quality but is associated with a significantly lower ongoing pregnancy rate.     

A prospective comparative study on IVF outcomes with either purified FSH or human menopausal gonadotrophin in downregulated normogonadotrophic women

OBJECTIVE: In compare the use of purified follicle-stimulating hormone with that of a preparation containing follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in infertile females undergoing IVF. DESIGN: Open-labelled prospective controlled single-center study. SETTING: Nile Badrawy IVF unit. PARTICIPANTS: 153 infertile females undergoing their first cycle of IVF divided into 2 groups. Interventions: Ovarian stimulation was done with either highly purified FSH for group 1 (n = 75) or human menopausal gonadotrophin group 2 (n = 78) after pituitary desensitization commenced in the midluteal phase of the preceding cycle. Monitoring was performed by ultrasound transvaginal oocyte retrieval followed by IVF and transfer of three embryos. OUTCOMES: Number of oocytes >18 mm at day of hCG, fertilization rate, embryo transfer rate, clinical pregnancy rate and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. RESULTS: The response to ovarian hyperstimulation was similar in both groups. The number of follicles >18 mm achieved at day of hCG was 12.3 +/- 0.9 (mean +/- SEM) following stimulation with 38.3 +/- 0.9 ampoules of Fostimon The Menogon-treated group needed 39.1 +/- 0.8 ampoules to produce 11.6 +/- 0.7 follicles. Fertilization rate (2PN/cell) was 58.6 vs. 64.2% in the Fostimon and Menogon group, respectively (p > 0.05). The number of embryos transferred per woman was 3.1 +/- 0.1 in the Fostimon group and 3.6 +/- 0.1 in the Menogon group. The pregnancy rate per woman was 33.3 vs. 25.6% in the Fostimon- and Menogon-treated groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Miscarriage rate was 16 vs 20%, respectively. However, the incidence of multiple pregnancies was significantly higher in the Fostimon-treated group (32%) vs. 10% only in the Menogon-treated group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Purified FSH yields similar clinical outcome to hMG in terms of oocytes retrieved and clinical pregnancies in a standard IVF regimen.     

Minimal stimulation using recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in women of advanced age

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether minimal stimulation with short-term application of low-dose recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) together with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist represents a cost-effective treatment regimen for patients with elevated FSH levels, aged 40 and above. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academically affiliated private in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. PATIENT(S): Eighty-five IVF cycles using minimal ovarian stimulation and 85 cycles with a standard long-stimulation protocol, conducted between January 2000 and January 2002, in women aged 40 and above who had slightly increased FSH levels. INTERVENTION(S): Patients on the long protocol underwent standard cycle monitoring and stimulation. In contrast, women with minimal stimulation had transvaginal sonography initiated on day 8 of the menstrual cycle and at a follicle size of 13 mm. We administered 0.25 mg of GnRH antagonist and 75 IU recombinant FSH daily until ovulation induction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Numbers of oocytes, and rates of cancellation and pregnancy. RESULT(S): Minimal stimulation cycles resulted in a clinical pregnancy rate of 8.2% per started cycle and 10% per embryo transfer (ET), whereas the control group yielded a clinical pregnancy rate of 10.6% per started cycle and of 10.7% per ET (not statistically significant). CONCLUSION(S): In women aged 40 and above with abnormal FSH levels, minimal stimulation protocol achieves similar pregnancy rates to a standard protocol, and thus represents a cost-effective alternative.     

Analysis of the cost effectiveness of recombinant versus urinary follicle-stimulating hormone in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection programs in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost effectiveness of recombinant human FSH (Gonal-F; Serono, Inc., Randolph, MA) and urinary FSH (Fertinex; Serono, Inc.) for ovarian stimulation during IVF with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of infertility. DESIGN: Clinical decision analysis techniques (the Markov model) were used to model the direct medical costs per patient during assisted reproductive technology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical and economic outcomes of two different ovarian stimulation protocols (recombinant human FSH or urinary FSH) during three treatment cycles were considered. RESULT(S): More ongoing pregnancies were achieved, with fewer stimulation cycles, after recombinant human FSH (Gonal-F) than after urinary FSH (Fertinex) (40,665 versus 37,890). In addition, recombinant human FSH was also found to be more cost effective per ongoing pregnancy. From a societal perspective, the mean cost per pregnancy was $40,688 for recombinant human FSH versus $47,096 for urinary FSH. From the insurers' perspective, the mean cost/pregnancy for recombinant human FSH was $28,481 versus $32,967 for urinary FSH. CONCLUSION(S): Recombinant human FSH (Gonal-F) is not only more efficient clinically than urinary FSH (Fertinex), but also more cost effective. This analysis illustrates the point that the economic effectiveness of a drug depends less on its acquisition costs and rather more on the clinical outcomes associated with its use.     

Updated meta-analysis of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus urinary FSH for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacy of recombinant FSH (rFSH) and urinary FSH (uFSH) for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive techniques (ART). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials comparing rFSH and uFSH. SETTING: Infertility centers providing treatment with ART. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing IVF with or without ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): Controlled ovarian stimulation using uFSH or rFSH (follitropin alpha or follitropin beta). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary: rate of clinical pregnancy per cycle. Secondary: rates of spontaneous abortion, multiple pregnancy, and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS); total gonadotropin dose; serum E(2) level and number of follicles at hCG administration; number of oocytes retrieved. RESULT(S): Eighteen trials were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher pregnancy rates with both follitropins compared with uFSH. However, statistical significance was reached only in the follitropin alpha versus uFSH comparison in IVF cycles, with an additional pregnancy for every 19 patients treated. Fewer units of rFSH than uFSH achieved the same E(2) level and oocyte yield. No differences were found between treatments in rates of spontaneous abortion, OHSS, and multiple gestation. CONCLUSION(S): rFSH produced higher pregnancy rates per cycle than uFSH when follitropin alpha was used in IVF, and the total gonadotropin dose required was lower.