EUCAST technical note on posaconazole

The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST-AFST) has determined breakpoints for posaconazole for Candida spp. This Technical Note is based on the EUCAST posaconazole rationale document (available on the EUCAST website: http://www.eucast.org). Species-specific breakpoints for C. albicans, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis are S: MIC ≤0.06 mg/L, R: MIC >0.06 mg/L. There are insufficient data to set breakpoints for C. glabrata and C. krusei as well as non-species-related breakpoints. The breakpoints are based upon pharmacokinetic data, epidemiological cut-off values and clinical experience. Breakpoints will be reviewed regularly.     

EUCAST Technical Note on Aspergillus and amphotericin B,itraconazole, and posaconazole

The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST-AFST) has determined breakpoints for amphotericin B, itraconazole and posaconazole for Aspergillus species. This Technical Note is based on the EUCAST amphotericin B, itraconazole and posaconazole rationale documents (available on the EUCAST website: http://www.eucast.org/antifungal_susceptibility_testing_afst/rationale_documents_for_antifungals/). The amphotericin B and itraconazole breakpoints are based on epidemiological cut-off values and clinical experience. The posaconazole breakpoints are also based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. Breakpoints will be reviewed regularly or when new data emerge.     

EUCAST technical note on anidulafungin

The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing-Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing has determined breakpoints for anidulafungin for Candida spp. This Technical Note is based on the EUCAST anidulafungin rationale document (available at: http://www.eucast.org). Species-specific breakpoints for C. albicans are S ≤0.03 mg/L and R >0.03 mg/L and for C. glabrata, C. tropicalis and C. krusei S ≤0.06 mg/L and R >0.06 mg/L. C. parapsilosis was not regarded a good target for anidulafungin. There are insufficient data to set breakpoints for other species. The breakpoints are based upon pharmacokinetic data, epidemiological cut-off values and clinical experience. Breakpoints will be reviewed regularly.     

EUCAST Technical Note on Voriconazole and Aspergillus spp.

The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST-AFST) has determined breakpoints for voriconazole against Aspergillus spp. This Technical Note is based on the EUCAST rationale document for voriconazole (available on the EUCAST website: http://www.eucast.org). Voriconazole breakpoints are based on epidemiological cut-off values, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data and clinical experience. Breakpoints will be reviewed regularly or when new data emerge.     

Multicentre testing of the EUCAST broth microdilution reference method for MIC determination on Mycobacterium tuberculosis

ObjectivesThe first objective of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) subcommittee for antimycobacterial susceptibility testing (AMST), launched in 2016, was to set a reference method for determining the MICs of antituberculous agents, since many protocols are used worldwide and a consensus one is needed for the determination of microbiological breakpoints.MethodsDuring 2017 and 2018, MIC determination protocols were evaluated prospectively in a multicentre study within the four AMST laboratories. MIC results were obtained for isoniazid, levofloxacin and amikacin on the reference strain Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv ATCC 27294. Broth microdilution (BMD) in Middlebrook 7H9 and solid medium dilution (SMD) in Middlebrook 7H10 were performed using two inoculum concentrations. MICs were interpreted with regard to visual and 99% inhibition after 7, 14 or 21 days of incubation for BMD and 21 days for SMD.ResultsFollowing the EUCAST reference protocol, intra- and inter-assay agreements were within ±1 MIC dilution for >95% of the observations for the three drugs in both methods. MIC values, presented as MIC mode (range) for BMD and SMD respectively, were: 0.03 (0.015–0.06) mg/L and 0.12 (0.06–0.25) mg/L for isoniazid, 0.25 mg/L (0.25–0.5) and 0.5 mg/L (0.12–0.5) for levofloxacin, and 0.5 mg/L (0.5–1.0) and 0.5 mg/L (0.5–1.0) for amikacin.ConclusionsBoth SMD and BMD were reproducible and eligible as a reference method for MIC determination of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). BMD was finally selected as the EUCAST reference method. From now on it will be used to set epidemiological cut-off values and clinical breakpoints of new and old antituberculous agents.     

Development of the EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method and its implementation in routine microbiology laboratories

With the support of ESCMID and European countries, EUCAST has developed a disk diffusion test with zone diameter breakpoints correlated with the EUCAST clinical MIC breakpoints. The development of the EUCAST disk diffusion method and quality control criteria are described, together with guidance on quality control and implementation of the method in clinical microbiology laboratories. The method includes the use of Mueller–Hinton agar without supplements for non-fastidious organisms and with 5% mechanically defibrinated horse blood and 20 mg/L β-NAD for fastidious organisms, a standardized inoculum resulting in confluent growth, an incubation time of 16–20 h, a reading guide on how to read zone diameters on individual species-agent combinations and zone diameter breakpoints calibrated to the EUCAST clinical MIC breakpoints. EUCAST recommendations are described in detail and updated regularly on the EUCAST website (http://www.eucast.org).     

Harmonization of antimicrobial breakpoints in Europe — Can it be achieved?

The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) isconvened by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and supported by representatives of almost all European countries. It is financed by ESCMID, the European Union, and the national breakpoint committees of France, Germany, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. The Committee has recently published harmonized European breakpoints for aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, glycopeptides, and linezolid and is currently addressing aztreonam, carbapenems and cephalosporins. EUCAST has recognized the inconsistencies between clinical breakpoints primarily aimed at predicting better (susceptible) versus worse (resistant) outcome and epidemiological cutoff values for early detection of antimicrobial resistance development. EUCAST clinical breakpoints are based primarily on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships but do take into account other factors, such as differences in dosing regimens, toxicology, resistance mechanisms, clinical outcome data, and wild-type MIC distributions. EUCAST has devised a system for collecting MIC distributions of wild-type bacteria and for setting epidemiological cutoff values. The output of EUCAST is freely available via the EUCAST website ().     

Area of technical uncertainty for susceptibility testing of amoxicillin/clavulanate against Escherichia coli: analysis of automated system,Etest and disk diffusion methods compared to the broth microdilution reference

ObjectivesThe European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recently warned about an area of technical uncertainty (ATU) of amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMX/C) disk susceptibility testing against members of the Enterobacterales. Thus, we aimed to compare the reliability of three routine methods and to evaluate the impact of the ATU.Methods286 Escherichia coli strains (including 159 AMX-resistant strains) were categorized for the two EUCAST AMX/C breakpoints by disk diffusion (Bio-Rad), the Phoenix automated system (Becton Dickinson) and the Etest (AES) compared to the broth microdilution reference method.ResultsBy microdilution, 84.2% of strains were AMX/C-susceptible using the urinary breakpoint (MIC ≤32 mg/L) and 62.2% using the systemic breakpoint (MIC ≤8 mg/L), with 63.6% of MICs between 4 and 16 mg/L. For the systemic breakpoint, category agreement (CA) and very major error (VME) were unacceptable for the Etest (71.7% and 27.3%), disk (73.1% and 23.4% at 19-mm cut-off) and to a lesser extent for the Phoenix system (83.6% and 10.5%). For disks, an unacceptable VME rate was observed for diameters up to 22 mm, probably due to overcharged disks. For the Etest, VMEs were high at 6 mg/L (46/63) and 8 mg/L (22/29). For the urinary breakpoint, CA was more acceptable for disk (88.9%) and Etest (84.3%) but was unevaluable for Phoenix.ConclusionAMX/C susceptibility testing of E. coli for systemic breakpoint was unreliable with the three routine methods, explained mainly by the high prevalence (~60%) of strains with microdilution MICs around the breakpoint (8 mg/L). Our data confirmed the EUCAST 19–20-mm ATU for disk and suggest introducing ATU for Etest MIC values of 6 and 8 mg/L.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates – the EUCAST broth microdilution reference method for MIC determination

ScopeSeveral methods are used worldwide for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). The variability in the results obtained with these methods hampers setting epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values and clinical breakpoints according to EUCAST guidelines. Methods for susceptibility testing and determination of the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) need to be standardized for MTBC isolates for old and new agents. Our objective was to establish a standardized reference method for MIC determination for MTBC.MethodsThe EUCAST antimycobacterial susceptibility testing subcommittee (AMST) compared protocols of MIC determination with regard to medium, inoculum preparation, antituberculous agent preparation, incubation, reading of the results and interpretation.RecommendationsThe EUCAST reference method of MIC determination for MTBC is the broth microdilution method in Middlebrook 7H9-10% OADC medium. The final inoculum is a 10⁵ CFU/mL suspension, obtained from a 10⁻² dilution of a 0.5 McFarland suspension prepared after vortexing bacterial colonies with glass beads before suspending them in sterile water. The culture is maintained in a U-shaped 96-well polystyrene microtitre sterile plate with a lid incubated at 36° ± 1°C. Reading is done using an inverted mirror as soon as the 1:100 diluted control (i.e. 10³ CFU/mL suspension) shows visual growth. The MIC, expressed in mg/L, is the lowest concentration that inhibits visual growth. Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv ATCC 27294 is used as the reference strain and its targeted MIC values are within the range 0.03–0.12 for isoniazid, 0.12–0.5 for levofloxacin and 0.25–1 mg/L for amikacin.ConclusionsThe EUCAST reference method for MTBC was endorsed by EUCAST after public consultation and will from now on be used to define EUCAST ECOFFs and clinical breakpoints. This reference method is not primarily intended to be used under routine conditions and the AST methods will need to be calibrated against this reference method to be used with EUCAST breakpoints.     

International and multicenter comparison of EUCAST and CLSI M27-A2 broth microdilution methods for testing susceptibilities of Candida spp. to fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole

The aim of this study was to compare MICs of fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole obtained by the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and CLSI (formerly NCCLS) methods in each of six centers for 15 Candida albicans (5 fluconazole-resistant and 4 susceptible-dose-dependent [S-DD] isolates), 10 C. dubliniensis, 7 C. glabrata (2 fluconazole-resistant isolates), 5 C. guilliermondii (2 fluconazole-resistant isolates), 10 C. krusei, 9 C. lusitaniae, 10 C. parapsilosis, and 5 C. tropicalis (1 fluconazole-resistant isolate) isolates. CLSI MICs were obtained visually at 24 and 48 h and spectrophotometric EUCAST MICs at 24 h. The agreement (within a 3-dilution range) between the methods was species, drug, and incubation time dependent and due to lower EUCAST than CLSI MICs: overall, 94 to 95% with fluconazole and voriconazole and 90 to 91% with posaconazole and itraconazole when EUCAST MICs were compared against 24-h CLSI results. The agreement was lower (85 to 94%) against 48-h CLSI endpoints. The overall interlaboratory reproducibility by each method was > or =92%. When the comparison was based on CLSI breakpoint categorization, the agreement was 68 to 76% for three of the four species that included fluconazole-resistant and S-DD isolates; 9% very major discrepancies (< or =8 microg/ml versus > or =64 microg/ml) were observed among fluconazole-resistant isolates and 50% with voriconazole (< or =1 microg/ml versus > or =4 microg/ml). Similar results were observed with itraconazole for seven of the eight species evaluated (28 to 77% categorical agreement). Posaconazole EUCAST MICs were also substantially lower than CLSI MIC modes (0.008 to 1 microg/ml versus 1 to > or =8 microg/ml) for some of these isolates. Therefore, the CLSI breakpoints should not be used to interpret EUCAST MIC data.     

Burkholderia pseudomallei multi-centre study to establish EUCAST MIC and zone diameter distributions and epidemiological cut-off values

ObjectivesMelioidosis, caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, requires intensive antimicrobial treatment. However, standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methodology based on modern principles for determining breakpoints and ascertaining performance of methods are lacking for B. pseudomallei. This study aimed to establish MIC and zone diameter distributions on which to set epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values for B. pseudomallei using standard EUCAST methodology for non-fastidious organisms.MethodsNon-consecutive, non-duplicate clinical B. pseudomallei isolates (9–70 per centre) were tested at eight study centres against eight antimicrobials by broth microdilution (BMD) and the EUCAST disc diffusion method. Isolates without and with suspected resistance mechanisms were deliberately selected. The EUCAST Development Laboratory ensured the quality of study materials, and provided guidance on performance of the tests and interpretation of results. Aggregated results were analysed according to EUCAST recommendations to determine ECOFFs.ResultsMIC and zone diameter distributions were generated using BMD and disc diffusion results obtained for 361 B. pseudomallei isolates. MIC and zone diameter ECOFFs (mg/L; mm) were determined for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (8; 22), ceftazidime (8; 22), imipenem (2; 29), meropenem (2; 26), doxycycline (2; none), tetracycline (8; 23), chloramphenicol (8; 22) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (4; 28).ConclusionsWe have validated the use of standard BMD and disc diffusion methodology for AST of B. pseudomallei. The MIC and zone diameter distributions generated in this study allowed us to establish MIC and zone diameter ECOFFs for the antimicrobials studied. These ECOFFs served as background data for EUCAST to set clinical MIC and zone diameter breakpoints for B. pseudomallei.     

Online-Only Abstract: Population-based burden of bloodstream infections in Finland

Clinical breakpoints are used in clinical microbiology laboratories to categorize microorganisms as clinically susceptible (S), intermediate (I) or resistant (R) dependent on the quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility as indicated by the MIC value determined in a well-defined standard test system. The laboratory report, with the designations of S, I or R for each antimicrobial agent, provides guidance to clinicians with respect to the potential use of agents in the treatment of patients, and clinical breakpoints should therefore distinguish between patients that are likely or unlikely to respond to antimicrobial treatment. In Europe, clinical breakpoints are set by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), following a defined procedure. This includes evaluation of efficacy in experimental settings and clinical studies to derive pharmacodynamic targets such as the fAUC/MIC ratio or %fT > MIC required for efficacy, the pharmacokinetic properties of the agent, Monte Carlo simulations to estimate exposures of the antimicrobial agent in the target patient population and commonly used dosing regimens. The probability of target attainment is subsequently determined for a range of pharmacodynamic targets and the results from the Monte Carlo simulations. The breakpoints derived are subsequently evaluated with respect to the wild-type population of the target microorganisms, specific resistance mechanisms and other relevant data. In this paper, we provide an overview of the EUCAST process and considerations for setting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints. These are the breakpoints that in the EUCAST breakpoint tables are referred to as ‘non-species-related breakpoints'.     

The role of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in setting clinical MIC breakpoints: the EUCAST approach

Clinical breakpoints are used in clinical microbiology laboratories to categorize microorganisms as clinically susceptible (S), intermediate (I) or resistant (R) dependent on the quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility as indicated by the MIC value determined in a well-defined standard test system. The laboratory report, with the designations of S, I or R for each antimicrobial agent, provides guidance to clinicians with respect to the potential use of agents in the treatment of patients, and clinical breakpoints should therefore distinguish between patients that are likely or unlikely to respond to antimicrobial treatment. In Europe, clinical breakpoints are set by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), following a defined procedure. This includes evaluation of efficacy in experimental settings and clinical studies to derive pharmacodynamic targets such as the fAUC/MIC ratio or %fT > MIC required for efficacy, the pharmacokinetic properties of the agent, Monte Carlo simulations to estimate exposures of the antimicrobial agent in the target patient population and commonly used dosing regimens. The probability of target attainment is subsequently determined for a range of pharmacodynamic targets and the results from the Monte Carlo simulations. The breakpoints derived are subsequently evaluated with respect to the wild-type population of the target microorganisms, specific resistance mechanisms and other relevant data. In this paper, we provide an overview of the EUCAST process and considerations for setting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints. These are the breakpoints that in the EUCAST breakpoint tables are referred to as ‘non-species-related breakpoints'.     

Granulomatous encephalitis caused by Bipolaris hawaiiensis

We describe a case of granulomatous encephalitis caused by Bipolaris (Drechslera) hawaiiensis in an immunocompetent patient. An 18-year-old man with a seven-month history of seizures and right leg weakness was found by computed tomographic scan to have a left frontoparietal enhancing lesion. Biopsy of the lesion revealed granulomatous inflammation and numerous septate hyphae. Culture of the biopsy specimen yielded a pure culture of B hawaiiensis in four days. Susceptibility studies revealed the organism to be sensitive to amphotericin B (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] equals 0.25 mg/L) and miconazole lactate (MIC equals 0.064 mg/L), but resistant to flucytosine (MIC greater than 100 mg/L). No synergy was demonstrated with amphotericin B and flucytosine in vitro. The patient was successfully treated with surgery and systemic and intrathecal amphotericin B therapy, and a negative culture was obtained from a repeated brain biopsy six weeks later.     

How to: ECOFFs—the why,the how,and the don'ts of EUCAST epidemiological cutoff values

BackgroundIdentifying the MIC wild-type distribution and its delineation of species targeted for receiving antimicrobial agent breakpoints is an important first step for determining clinical breakpoints. Having the main responsibility in the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) for characterizing the wild-type distributions and setting epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs), we explain the why, the how, and frequent misconceptions of wild-type MIC distributions and ECOFFs.ObjectivesTo clarify how wild-type MIC distributions and ECOFFs for agents and important target organisms are defined and determined and why these are important tools in microbiology, as well as to point to common misunderstandings and inappropriate use.SourcesThe EUCAST database of >40 000 MIC distributions; publications addressing the definition of wild-type MIC distributions, and ECOFFs in bacteria and fungi; and the EUCAST Standard Operating Procedure 10 Documents published by the European Centre for Disease Control and the European Food Safety Agency.ContentThe rationale for defining wild-type distributions and ECOFFs is explained. Setting breakpoints that bisect wild-type MIC distributions leads to poor methodological reproducibility and poor correlation between clinical outcome and susceptibility testing results. The methods applied by EUCAST to select distributions for aggregation and website display are described, highlighting the importance of incorporating data from multiple sources and methods. The methods used by EUCAST to estimate ECOFFs are outlined. Finally, the common misunderstandings of these processes are addressed.ImplicationsThe international community needs to agree on the phenotypic definitions of wild-type distributions. Systematic methods for developing and applying ECOFFs are essential to the conduct of phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing and interpretation, which will remain the dominant laboratory method for the foreseeable future.     

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) Technical Notes on antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The main objectives of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) are to harmonise breakpoints for antimicrobial agents in Europe, and to act as the breakpoint committee for the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) during the registration of new antimicrobial agents. Detailed EUCAST procedures for harmonising and setting breakpoints for antimicrobial agents are available on the EUCAST website. Beginning with the current issue, a series of EUCAST Technical Notes will be published in CMI, based on the rationale documents produced by EUCAST for each of the antimicrobial agents studied, with the aim of highlighting important background information underlying decisions on breakpoints made by EUCAST.     

Antifungal activity of nitroxoline against Candida auris isolates

ObjectivesTo investigate the in vitro activity of nitroxoline against a molecularly characterized collection of clinical Candida auris isolates.MethodsThirty-five clinical isolates of C. auris from diverse sources representing all five different C. auris clades were included in the study. Nitroxoline activity was assessed using broth microdilution. Additionally, susceptibility testing by disc diffusion was assessed on RPMI-1640 and Müller–Hinton agar plates. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of the antifungals fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B and anidulafungin were determined.ResultsNitroxoline MICs ranged from 0.125 to 1 mg/L (MIC_50/90 0.25/0.5 mg/L). Compared with amphotericin B (MIC >1 mg/L in 4/35 isolates), anidulafungin (MIC >0.06 mg/L in 26/35 isolates) and fluconazole (MIC >4 mg/L in 31/35 isolates), in vitro activity of nitroxoline was high. Isolates belonging to clade I had marginally lower nitroxoline MICs (range 0.125–0.5 mg/L, mean MIC 0.375 mg/L) compared with clade III (range 0.5–1 mg/L, mean MIC 0.7 mg/L; p = 0.0094). The correlation of MIC and inhibition zones by disc diffusion was good when using RPMI-agar for disc diffusion, with a Pearson's correlation coefficient of –0.74 (95% CI –0.86 to –0.54).ConclusionsNitroxoline has excellent in vitro activity against C. auris isolates, with MICs of 0.125–1 mg/L (for comparison, the EUCAST breakpoint for uncomplicated urinary tract infection with Escherichia coli is ≤ 16 mg/L). It is an approved, well-tolerated antimicrobial that achieves high urinary concentrations after oral administration and could be a useful treatment option in C. auris candiduria.     

How to: perform antifungal susceptibility testing of microconidia-forming dermatophytes following the new reference EUCAST method E.Def 11.0, exemplified by Trichophyton

BackgroundAntifungal drug resistance in dermatophytes was first reported shortly after the turn of the millennium and has today been reported in Trichophyton and occasionally in Microsporum, but not in Epidermophyton species. Although drug resistance in dermatophytes is not routinely investigated, resistance in Trichophyton spp. is increasingly reported worldwide. The highest rates are observed in India (36% and 68% for terbinafine (MIC ≥4 mg/L) and fluconazole (MICs ≥16 mg/L), respectively), and apparently involve the spread of a unique clade related to the Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale complex.ObjectivesThe European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST-AFST) has released a new method (E.Def 11.0) for antifungal susceptibility testing against microconidia-forming dermatophytes including tentative MIC ranges for quality control strains and tentative breakpoints against Trichophyton rubrum and T. interdigitale. Here, the details of the new procedure E.Def 11.0 are described.SourcesThis technical note is based on the multicentre validation of the EUCAST dermatophyte antifungal susceptibility testing method, the mould testing method (E.Def 9.3.2) and the updated quality control tables for antifungal susceptibility testing document, v 5.0 (available on the EUCAST website).ContentsThe method is based on the EUCAST microdilution method for moulds but significant differences include: (a) an altered test medium selective for dermatophytes; (b) an altered incubation time and temperature; and (c) a different end-point criterion (spectrophotometric determination) of fungal growth. It can easily be implemented in laboratories already performing EUCAST microdilution methods and has been validated for terbinafine, voriconazole, itraconazole and amorolfine against T. rubrum and T. interdigitale.ImplicationsThis standardized procedure with automated end-point reading will allow broader implementation of susceptibility testing of dermatophytes and so facilitate earlier appropriate therapy. This is important, as resistance is rapidly emerging and largely underdiagnosed.     

In vitro antibacterial activity of doripenem against clinical isolates from French teaching hospitals: proposition of zone diameter breakpoints

The aims of the study were to determine the in vitro activity of doripenem, a new carbapenem, against a large number of bacterial pathogens and to propose zone diameter breakpoints for clinical categorization in France according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints. The MICs of doripenem were determined by the broth microdilution method against 1,547 clinical isolates from eight French hospitals. The disk diffusion test was performed (10-??g discs) according to the Comité de l??Antibiogramme de la Société Fran?aise de Microbiologie (CASFM) method. The MIC_50/90 (mg/L) values were as follows: methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (0.03/0.25), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (1/2), methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (MSCoNS) (0.03/0.12), methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCoNS) (2/8), Streptococcus pneumoniae (0.016/0.25), viridans group streptococci (0.016/2), ??-hemolytic streptococci (??0.008/??0.008), Enterococcus faecalis (2/4), Enterococcus faecium (128/>128), Enterobacteriaceae (0.06/0.25), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (0.5/8), Acinetobacter baumannii (0.25/2), Haemophilus influenzae (0.12/0.25), and Moraxella catarrhalis (0.03/0.06). According to the regression curve, the zone diameter breakpoints were 24 and 19?mm for MICs of 1 and 4?mg/L, respectively. This study confirms the potent in vitro activity of doripenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter, Enterobacteriaceae, MSSA, MSCoNS, and respiratory pathogens. According to the EUCAST MIC breakpoints (mg/L) ??1/>4 for Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter, and ??1/>1 for streptococci, pneumococci, and Haemophilus, the zone diameter breakpoints could be (mm) ??24/<19 and ??24/<24, respectively.     

Sequence-based identification,genotyping and EUCAST antifungal susceptibilities of Trichosporon clinical isolates from Greece

Trichosporon yeasts constitute emerging pathogens, implicated in organ-specific and systemic infections. In this first, comprehensive study of Trichosporon clinical isolates in Greece, 42 isolates were identified by sequencing the hypervariable D1/D2 domain of the Large Subunit (LSU) rDNA gene, while Trichosporon asahii were genotyped by sequencing the Intergenic Spacer 1 region, and antifungal susceptibilities were determined by the EDef 7.2 (EUCAST) method, in parallel with the CLSI standard. Trichosporon asahii was the primary species (37 isolates) followed by Trichosporon coremiiforme, Trichosporon dermatis, Trichosporon loubieri and Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans. One strain remained unidentified. Seven T. asahii genotypes were recorded. The major genotypes were: genotypes 4 (29%) and 3 (26%) followed by 1, 5 and 7 (9.5% each). Two novel genotypes were identified designated as 10 and 11. EUCAST MIC ≥2 mg/L was recorded in 58% of the isolates (amphotericin B), 41% (itraconazole), 41% (posaconazole) and 38% (voriconazole). Fluconazole MICs of ≥32 mg/L were recorded in 23.8% of the isolates. Analysis of variance performed on absolute values showed that the amphotericin B, itraconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole MICs of T. asahii were equivalent. Typically higher MIC values were displayed by fluconazole. Antifungal susceptibilities of the seven different genotypes were homogeneous. Agreements between EUCAST and CLSI ranged from 88.1 to 97.62%. Overall, the high MICs recorded among the Trichosporon isolates for all tested drugs justify routine susceptibility testing of clinical isolates.