Axillary Artery Perfusion in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair

Abstract Background: We evaluated our experience with axillary artery perfusion technique in acute type A aortic dissection repair. Methods: Between September 2000 and July 2006, 41 consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection underwent surgical repair. In 35 of 41 patients (85.4%), arterial perfusion was performed through right axillary artery and in the remaining six patients (14.6%), arterial perfusion site was femoral artery. Indication for femoral artery perfusion was cardiac arrest and ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in one and pulslessness of right upper limb in five patients. Mean age was 54.9 ± 15.3 (16 to 90 years) and 28 were male. Unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (perfusate temperature 22 to 25 °C) through axillary artery was performed in all axillary artery perfused patients and in three patients who had femoral artery perfusion. Results: Five patients died postoperatively (hospital mortality 12.2%). All of them had evidence of single or multiple organ malperfusion preoperatively. We did not experience any new transient or permanent neurologic deficit after the procedure in the unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion patients. Complications related to axillary artery cannulation were observed in two patients (5.3%). One patient with femoral artery cannulation experienced femoral arterial thrombosis, postoperatively. Conclusions: Right axillary artery cannulation for repair of acute type A aortic dissection is a simple and safe procedure. In the case of pulslessness of right upper limb, femoral artery is still the choice of cannulation site.     

Advantages of subclavian artery perfusion for repair of acute type A dissection.

OBJECTIVE: Arterial perfusion through the right subclavian artery is proposed to avoid intraoperative malperfusion during repair of acute type A dissection. This study evaluated the clinical and neurological outcome of patients undergoing surgery of acute aortic type A dissection following subclavian arterial cannulation compared to femoral artery approach. METHODS: From 1/97 to 1/03, 122 consecutive patients underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Subclavian cannulation was performed in 62 versus femoral cannulation in 60 patients. Clinical characteristics in both groups were similar. Mean age was 61 years (SD+/-14 years, 72% male) and mean follow-up was 3 years (+/-2 years). Patient outcome was assessed as the prevalence of clinical complications, especially neurological deficits, mortality at 30 days, perioperative morbidity and time of body temperature cooling and analyzed by nominal logistic regression analysis for odds ratio calculation. RESULTS: Arterial subclavian cannulation was successfully performed without any occurrence of malperfusion in all cases. Patients undergoing subclavian cannulation showed an odds ratio of 1.98 (95% CI 1.15-3.51; P=0.0057) for an improved neurological outcome compared to patients undergoing femoral cannulation. Re-exploration rate for postoperative bleeding was significantly reduced in the subclavian group (P<0.0001), as well as occurrence of myocardial infarction (P<0.0001) and duration for body temperature cooling (P=0.004). The 30-day mortality of patients with femoral cannulation was significantly higher compared to patients with subclavian artery cannulation (24 versus 8%; P=0.0179). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial perfusion through the right subclavian artery provides an excellent approach for repair of acute type A dissection with optimized arterial perfusion body perfusion and allows for antegrade cerebral perfusion during circulatory arrest. The technique is safe and results in a significantly improved clinical and especially neurological outcome.     

不同腋动脉插管方法在StanfordA型主动脉夹层手术中的应用

目的比较两种不同右侧腋动脉插管方法对Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者行主动脉弓置换术的安全性和临床效果。方法 2008年7月至2010年7月北京安贞医院对280例Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者采用右侧腋动脉插管建立体外循环(CPB),行全弓置换+降主动脉支架人工血管植入术。根据术中腋动脉插管方式将280例患者分为两组,直接插管组(n=215),年龄(43.1±9.5)岁,行直接腋动脉插管;间接插管组(n=65),年龄(44.7±8.3)岁,腋动脉连接人工血管行间接插管。观察两组患者的安全性,比较相关手术参数、临床结果和术后恢复情况。结果住院死亡10例,其中直接插管组7例(7/215,3.3%),间接插管组3例(3/65,4.6%);所有患者均成功行腋动脉插管;术后25例(25/280,8.9%)出现暂时性神经系统功能障碍,其中直接插管组19例(8.8%),间接插管组6例(9.2%),均经治疗痊愈。间接插管组患者术后腋动脉插管并发症明显少于直接插管组,差异有统计学意义((1例vs.19例,P=0.045)。两组患者体外循环期间最高流量、最高泵压,深低温停循环时间、顺行性脑灌注时间和CPB时间差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论经人工血管右侧腋动脉插管可以降低腋动脉插管相关并发症,安全用于Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者的外科手术治疗。     

Axillary artery cannulation in type a aortic dissection operations.

BACKGROUND: Femoral arteries are the preferred site of peripheral cannulation for arterial inflow in type A aortic dissection operations. The presence of aortoiliac aneurysms, severe peripheral occlusive disease, atherosclerosis of the femoral vessels, and distal extension of the aortic dissection may preclude their utilization. Axillary artery cannulation may represent a valid alternative in these circumstances. METHODS: Between January 15, 1989, and August 20, 1998, in our institution, 22 of 152 operations (14.4%) for acute type A aortic dissection were performed with the use of the axillary artery for the arterial inflow. Axillary artery cannulation was undertaken in the presence of femoral arteries bilaterally compromised by dissection in 12 patients (54.5%), abdominal aorta and peripheral aneurysm in 5 patients (22.7%), severe atherosclerosis of both femoral arteries in 3 patients (13. 6%), and aortoiliac occlusive disease in 2 patients (9.1%). In all patients, distal anastomosis was performed with an open technique after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Retrograde cerebral perfusion was used in 9 patients (40.9%). RESULTS: Axillary artery cannulation was successful in all patients. The left axillary artery was cannulated in 20 patients (90.9%), and the right axillary artery was cannulated in 2 patients (9.1%). Axillary artery cannulation followed an attempt of femoral artery cannulation in 15 patients (68. 2%). All patients survived the operation, and no patient had a cerebrovascular accident. No axillary artery thrombosis, no brachial plexus injury, and no intraoperative malperfusion were recorded in this series. Two patients (9.1%) died in the hospital of complications not related to axillary artery cannulation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type A aortic dissection in whom femoral arteries are acutely or chronically diseased, axillary artery cannulation represents a safe and effective means of providing arterial inflow during cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Cannulation of the innominate artery during surgery of the thoracic aorta: our experience in 55 patients.

BACKGROUND: Alternative cannulation sites such as the right/left axillary artery, the ascending aorta and aortic arch have been recently preferred to the femoral artery to improve neurologic outcome in patients undergoing surgery of the thoracic aorta. In 2004, we started to select the innominate artery as an arterial cannulation site for CPB and antegrade cerebral perfusion institution. Here we present our preliminary experience with 55 patients. METHODS: Between November 2004 and 2006, 55 patients (mean age 60+/-14 years) underwent surgery on the thoracic aorta using the innominate artery as a site for arterial cannulation. Indication for surgery was a degenerative aneurysm in 49 (89.1%), an acute type A dissection in 2 patients (3.6%), a post-dissection aneurysm in 3 (5.4%), a supravalvular aortic stenosis in 1 patient (1.8%). Operative procedure included total arch replacement (n=9), hemiarch replacement (n=6), ascending aorta replacement (n=21), Bentall procedure (n=18) and aortoplasty with patch (n=1). Mean CPB and cross clamp times were 131+/-60 and 95+/-29 min, respectively. Mean cerebral perfusion time was 54+/-26 min. RESULTS: The hospital mortality rate was 3.6%. There were no permanent neurologic dysfunction and one (1.8%) temporary neurological dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our results with the cannulation of the innominate artery were encouraging. This provides the same advantages of the axillary artery cannulation with greater simplicity and avoiding extra surgical incisions which may be site for local complications. It may represent a valid option for CPB and antegrade cerebral perfusion institution in aortic procedures.     

Usefulness of the axillary artery as vascular access for cardiopulmonary bypass

AIM: In this paper we report our clinical experience with extended utilization of axillary artery cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and discuss the indications and the results of the procedure in terms of complications and usefulness. METHODS: Between January 1999 and May 2004, 26 patients underwent right axillary artery cannulation for CPB. Fifteen patients presented acute type A aortic dissection and were operated urgently. Axillary cannulation was also used in 11 elective cases: 3 reoperative coronary surgery, 3 valve redo-operations and 5 cases of aortic valve regurgitation+aneurysm of the ascending aorta. RESULTS: All axillary artery cannulations were successful (21 direct and 5 with a side graft) without neurologic or vascular injuries to the right upper extremities. Hospital mortality was 7.7% and included 2 patients operated in an emergency procedure because of acute type A aortic dissection. In all cases, this cannulation site provided adequate perfusion, with a range of peak flows from 4.1 to 5.7 L/min. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results demonstrate that the right axillary artery may be considered an alternative cannulation site for achieving full CPB and providing antegrade flow, thus avoiding complications related to retrograde flow when femoral artery perfusion is performed. This safe and useful method may be used not only in aortic surgery but in other such complex cardiac procedures as redo-operations.     

Is the axillary artery a suitable cannulation site in aortic surgery?

AIM: The axillary artery is currently gaining interest as an alternative to femoral artery cannulation in aortic surgery. It was the aim of our study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of axillary artery cannulation in a series of patients undergoing surgery of the ascending aorta and/or the aortic arch. METHODS: From 1998 to 2002 cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) perfusion via the axillary artery was intended in 35 patients (28 male), median age 61 (22-77) years. The underlying disease was acute aortic dissection type A in 22/35 (63%), chronic aortic dissection type A in 2/35 (6%), ascending aortic aneurysm in 8/35 (22%), aortic regurgitation after previous ascending aortic replacement in 1/35 (3%), pseudoaneurysm after Bentall operation in 1/35 (3%) and coronary artery disease with severe arteriosclerosis of the aorta in 1/35 (3%). RESULTS: Conversion to femoral artery or ascending aortic cannulation was necessary in 3 patients. In the other cases, adequate CPB flows of 2.4 l/m2/min were achieved. In 1 case local dissection of the axillary artery occurred after emergency cannulation. No postoperative complications related to axillary artery cannulation, such as upper extremity ischemia, brachial plexus injury, or local wound infection occurred. No new postoperative stroke was noted, hospital mortality was 4/35 (11%) patients. CONCLUSION: Axillary artery cannulation is feasible in the majority of cases and seems to be a safe and effective method in surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Several disadvantages of femoral artery cannulation and perfusion can be avoided.     

Axillary artery cannulation for arterial inflow in patients with acute dissection of the ascending aorta.

The axillary artery is an alternative site for arterial cannulation that avoids manipulation of the ascending aorta or aortic arch and provides antegrade blood flow during surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Right axillary artery cannulation has been used in 27 patients for arterial perfusion. There were no complications related to the technique of axillary cannulation. All patients but one awoke neurologically intact from operation and suffered no complications. Hospital mortality occurred in two (7.4%) patients. Axillary cannulation is easy to establish and may safely be used for arterial inflow during surgery for acute type A dissection of the ascending aorta.     

Left axillary artery perfusion in surgery of type A aortic dissection

PURPOSE: A left axillary artery perfusion instead of a femoral perfusion has the benefit of avoiding false lumen perfusion and atheroembolization into the brain, which is caused by retrograde perfusion in type A aortic dissection surgery. We performed type A aortic dissection surgery using the left axillary artery perfusion technique and reviewed this method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2002 to January 2004, 8 patients with a mean age of 70 years (48 to 81), underwent axillary artery cannulation with a side graft technique in type A aortic dissection operations. Six patients had acute type A and 2 had chronic type A dissections. The surgical procedures were ascending aortic replacement in 5, hemiarch replacement in 2, and total arch replacement in 1. RESULTS: In all patients, a cardiopulmonary bypass was established through the left axillary perfusion. There were no operative deaths and no hospital deaths. All patients were able to avoid cerebral vascular accidents. One patient required a femoro-femoro bypass on the 10th postoperative day because of malperfusion of the left leg, which occurred suddenly. Postoperative hemorrhaging requiring resternotomy occurred in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: A left axillary artery perfusion is safe and useful for arterial inflow for type A aortic dissection surgery.     

Postoperative peri-axillary seroma following axillary artery cannulation for surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection

The arterial cannulation site for optimal tissue perfusion and cerebral protection during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection remains controversial. Right axillary artery cannulation confers significant advantages, because it provides antegrade arterial perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass, and allows continuous antegrade cerebral perfusion during hypothermic circulatory arrest, thereby minimizing global cerebral ischemia. However, right axillary artery cannulation has been associated with serious complications, including problems with systemic perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass, problems with postoperative patency of the artery due to stenosis, thrombosis or dissection, and brachial plexus injury. We herein present the case of a 36-year-old Caucasian man with known Marfan syndrome and acute type A aortic dissection, who had direct right axillary artery cannulation for surgery of the ascending aorta. Postoperatively, the patient developed an axillary perigraft seroma. As this complication has, not, to our knowledge, been reported before in cardiothoracic surgery, we describe this unusual complication and discuss conservative and surgical treatment options.     

Detection and monitoring of complications associated with femoral or axillary arterial cannulation for surgical repair of aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES: Femoral arterial perfusion can be associated with complications, and axillary arterial perfusion is not free from risk. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence and complications of femoral versus axillary artery cannulation for surgical repair of aortic dissection and to devise a strategy for early detection and monitoring of complications using transesophageal echocardiography, near-infrared spectroscopy, and orbital Doppler. DESIGN: Retrospective and observational. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-five consecutive patients with aortic dissection who underwent aortic repair between 1995 and 2004. INTERVENTIONS: Aortic surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 44 cases with femoral arterial perfusion, sudden onset of hypotension occurred in 3 cases but was immediately treated based on the TEE diagnosis (collapse of true lumen in the descending aorta). In another case, myocardial ischemia occurred because of occlusion of the coronary artery. These four cases comprised 57.1% of 7 patients with type III dissection with retrograde extension in whom femoral arterial perfusion was used. However, malperfusion was not encountered in 3 cases of the same type of dissection but with axillary arterial perfusion. Axillary artery perfusion (29 cases) led to malperfusion of the right frontal lobe and coronary artery in 1 case each. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible management guided by real-time information is essential. Upon initiating femoral arterial perfusion, malperfusion should first be checked for in the descending aorta and then in the coronary and visceral arteries, especially in cases of type III dissection with retrograde extension. Attention should be paid to cerebral and coronary malperfusion when initiating axillary arterial perfusion.     

Technical problems and complications of axillary artery cannulation.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiopulmonary bypass via the axillary artery is frequently used especially in aortic dissections. With an increased use of this technique problems were recognized too. We describe the technical problems and complications associated with axillary artery cannulation. METHODS: Sixty-five patients underwent cannulation of the axillary artery. The indication for operation was acute aortic dissection type A in 57%, chronic aortic dissection in 8%, aortic aneurysm in 18%, pseudoaneurysm in 3%, and others in 14%. RESULTS: Technical problems and complications occurred in 14%, and in 11% the perfusion had to be switched to either femoral (n=5) or aortic cannulation (n=2). Arterial damage or dissection of the axillary artery or the aorta occurred in 0% of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 9% with direct cannulation (P=n.s.). Cannulation problems or insufficient CPB flow due to a narrow vessel occurred in 0% of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 4% with direct cannulation (P=n.s.). Malperfusion in aortic dissections occurred in 20% of the sidegraft technique, whereas they were found in 0% with direct cannulation (P=0.016). No postoperative complications related to axillary cannulation which were evaluated by clinical examination, such as brachial plexus injury, axillary artery thrombosis or local wound infection were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although axillary artery cannulation is an attractive alternative to femoral cannulation there needs to be an alertness for technical problems. Different complications occur with either direct cannulation or the sidegraft technique and at present it remains the surgeons preference which technique for axillary artery cannulation is used.     

Axillary cerebral perfusion for arch surgery in acute type A dissection under moderate hypothermia

Backgound: Aortic arch surgery is still associated with increased mortality and morbidity especially in acute type A aortic dissection. Adequate brain protection is essential and commonly performed by either antegrade selective perfusion of the brachiocephalic arteries or an interval of profound hypothermic circulatory arrest. We present our experience for open aortic arch repair with continuous antegrade brain perfusion by means of direct cannulation of the right axillary artery, under moderate hypothermia in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Methods: In, 25 consecutive patients (17 men) with a mean age of 62.6 ± 14.8 years, aortic repair extended to the arch, for acute type A aortic dissection, was performed through a midline sternotomy. The right axillary artery was used for arterial systemic and brain perfusion at a rectal temperature of 25–27 °C. Results: Mean duration of CPB and aortic cross-clamping was 241 ± 55 and 155 ± 72 min, respectively. The mean duration of circulatory arrest of the lower body and brain perfusion was 39.7 (range, 24–55 min). All the patients survived the procedure and all but one were discharged from hospital. One patient had left arm paralysis which he recovered the first postoperative month. There were no other transient or permanent neurologic deficits. A CT scan was performed at discharge for routine postoperative evaluation. There were no local neurovascular complications related to the cannulation site except for one local re-exploration for bleeding. Conclusions: The absence of any major permanent neurologic deficit or any visceral damages in our patients suggests that continuous moderate hypothermic cerebral perfusion, with an interval of circulatory arrest of the lower body, is adequate for acute type A aortic dissection surgery, allowing safe open repair of the distal aortic arch.     

Cardiopulmonary bypass via common carotid artery cannulation in redo sternotomy

There are certain situations in redo cardiac surgery in adults where it may not be possible to use alternate arterial cannulation sites like the common femoral artery and axillary artery. We report a case where we established safe cardiopulmonary bypass with common carotid artery cannulation in an adult patient. The patient underwent aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation 8 months after repair of type A aortic dissection plus aortic valve resuspension.     

Femoral cannulation is safe for type A dissection repair

Background

Recently, surgeons have embraced axillary artery cannulation for type A aortic dissection repair out of concern for malperfusion phenomena with traditional femoral artery cannulation. My colleagues and I sought to determine whether these concerns are justified.

Methods

Records of 86 consecutive patients (51 men and 35 women; age, 30 to 86 years; mean, 62 years) undergoing surgical repair for acute type A dissection were reviewed. Cannulation site, specific operative repair, and complications related to cannulation were noted.

Results

Seventy-nine cannulations were performed in the femoral artery (47 left, 23 right, and 9 unspecified), 3 in the axillary artery (1 left and 2 right), and 4 in the ascending aorta or arch. Deep hypothermic arrest was used in 64 operations. Seven involved re-sternotomy. Seventy patients had supracoronary grafts (2 with valve replacement and 10 with valve resuspension), and 16 underwent aortic root replacement. Fourteen patients were in shock from cardiac tamponade. Eighty patients survived the operation, and 71 were hospital survivors. Malperfusion on initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass was noted in 3 patients. In 1, the original cannulation site was the ascending aorta, and the cannula was moved to the femoral artery for correction. In 2, the original cannulation site was the femoral artery, and the cannula was moved to the ascending aorta. Malperfusion on clamping of the aorta or on resumption of aortic flow was noted in no patient. Postoperative ischemia of any vascular bed was noted locally only in 3 (cannulated) lower extremities.

Conclusions

Straight femoral cannulation for all phases of type A dissection repair is appropriate and yields excellent clinical results. The anticipated malperfusion events are actually rare (2 of 79 with femoral artery cannulation, or 2.5%).     

Intraoperative iatrogenic type A aortic dissection and perioperative outcome

We assessed the risks and causative mechanisms of intraoperative iatrogenic aortic dissection type A. During a 3-year period (2002-2004) with 3000 open heart cases, 7 patients sustained an intraoperative aortic dissection type A, resulting in an incidence of 0.23%. The original procedures were mitral valve replacement in 3 patients, aorto coronary bypass surgery in 2 patients, ascending aortic replacement with aortic valve replacement and single lung transplantation with ECMO support in 1 patient each. Dissection occurred during aortic cannulation or decannulation in 3 patients, during insertion of the antegrade cardioplegia line in 1 patient, during manipulation of the aortic cannula in 1 patient and through direct cannulation of the axillary artery in 1 patient, and during femoral artery cannulation in 1 patient. Replacement of the ascending aorta with resection of the entry side was successfully performed in all 7 patients (median OT time 387 min, ECC 192 min, ACC 101 min, CA 25 min). Patients with iatrogenic aortic dissection have an increased mortality rate and risk factors for bad outcome are as follows: a mean aortic pressure of less than 50 mmHg during the change of arterial cannulation site, advanced age and the time of diagnosis of the dissection.     

The advantages of axillary artery cannulation in surgical treatment of type A acute aortic dissection

There are more alternative cannulation techniques during surgery of type A aortic dissection. The most frequently used femoro-atrial cannulation method provides limited possibility for brain protection during surgery. This theory is confirmed by relatively high frequency of major brain complications in patients operated on while using this cannulation technique. During the last years cannulationis used more often, as it may provide more protection for the brain than other methods. In 2003 seven patients underwent aortic reconstruction because of type A acute aortic dissection using axillary cannulation. All patients except one were discharged after uneventful recovery. There were no postoperative neurological complications following surgery. We lost one patient due to distal progression of the dissection. He was the only patient with clinical evidence of transient postoperative brain damage. We are strongly convinced that the spectacular improvement in our results for the surgery of type A acute aortic dissection is due to the axillary cannulation, the anterograde flow and the isolated cerebral perfusion. We recommend the axillary cannulation technique as the first choice in type A acute aortic dissection.     

Rapid and safe establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass in repair of acute aortic dissection: improved results with double cannulation

There is no agreement at present as to which is the optimal site for artery cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass in repair of acute aortic dissection (AAD). We have employed right axillary artery cannulation (RAAC) in combination with femoral artery cannulation to overcome the drawbacks of single cannulation. From January 2000 to August 2006, 88 patients underwent emergency surgical repair of the aortic arch (mean age 65+/-13 years, 37 men) for AAD. All operations were performed under hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion. Preoperatively, nine patients were in shock and 18 patients showed malperfusion. The average duration of circulatory arrest was 52+/-17 min and that of myocardial ischemia was 135+/-53 min. Total aortic arch replacement was done in 47 patients and hemiarch aortic replacement in 41. The hospital mortality rate was 2.3% (2 of 88); the fatal cases were among those who were in shock preoperatively. The perioperative stroke rate was 5.7% (5 of 88). The hospital mortality rate of the 25 patients with preoperative malperfusion was 4.0% (1 of 25); the fatal case had coronary malperfusion. Our approach for AAD was associated with a low mortality even in patients with malperfusion.     

Operation on acute type A aortic dissection using transapical aortic cannulation

We experienced a case of operation for acute type A aortic dissection using transapical aortic cannulation (TAC). A 62-year-old male with chest and back pain admitted to our hospital. The chest computed tomography (CT) showed the dissection of total aorta. Hemiarch repair (circulatory arrest time: 64 min, pump time: 152 min) was performed by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) established with bicaval cannulation and TAC in this case. The reason why we use TAC is that retrograde perfusion by femoral artery has a high-risk of malperfusion and cerebral embolism because of atheromatous change in aorta, and the use of the axillary artery can be troublesome because of the vessel's small diameter. We considered that in cases of acute aortic dissection, TAC is much safer and simpler than femoral or axillary cannulation.     

Axillary Artery Cannulation for Cardiopulmonary Bypass during Surgery on the Ascending Aorta and Arch

Abstract   Background: Performing axillary artery cannulation, during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with an atherosclerotic ascending aorta or acute dissection of the ascending aorta and arch, is of growing interest. Our aim is to present our experience, to describe the surgical technique, and to demonstrate the sufficient cerebral and total body perfusion through axillary artery cannulation. Patients and Methods: Twenty-two patients (17 male, five female) underwent surgical treatment with the axillary technique. The log euro SCORE ranged from 6.77% to 70% (mean 28.28). Nine of these patients underwent elective procedure. Eight underwent aortic surgery for pathologies of the aorta and in one patient we performed combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting. Thirteen patients underwent emergency operation because of acute dissection of the aorta. Twelve of these patients had a type A dissection (according to Stanford classification) and one patient had a type B aortic dissection. Results: The majority of complications were associated with ruptured dissection of the thoracoabdominal aorta and acute dissection of ascending aorta. Despite preoperative disease states that placed our patients at high risk of stroke and visceral end-organ injury, no clinically demonstrable permanent postoperative deficits were observed. Our patients had no neurological dysfunction, stroke, or other complications. Conclusions: Antegrade cerebral perfusion is of paramount importance in cases of aortic atherosclerosis or aortic dissection. The axillary artery provides an excellent site for safe antegrade perfusion, which may play a role in preventing stroke.