随机尿清蛋白/尿肌酐比率测定在慢性肾病的应用

目的研究随机尿清蛋白/尿肌酐比率测定在慢性肾病的应用。方法以测定24 h尿蛋白定量为金标准,比较56例蛋白尿阳性慢性肾脏疾病患者和33例蛋白尿阴性非慢性肾脏病患者的尿蛋白定性、随机尿蛋白定量、随机尿清蛋白定量、随机尿蛋白/肌酐比率、随机尿清蛋白/肌酐比率的检测结果,评价尿清蛋白/肌酐比率的灵敏度（S）、特异度（Sp）、似然比（LR）等诊断性能。结果与24 h尿蛋白定量结果比较：随机尿蛋白/肌酐比率,S=0.91、Sp=0.91、阴性预测值（NPV）=0.86、阳性预测值（PPV）=0.94、-LR=0.1、＋LR=10.1、准确性（ACC）=0.91;随机尿清蛋白/肌酐比率,S=0.96、Sp=0.88、NPV=0.94、PPV=0.93、-LR=0.045、＋LR=8.0、ACC=0.93。结论随机尿（清）蛋白/肌酐比率测定可作为筛检24 h尿蛋白定量的常规检测项目。     

Comparison of instrument-read dipsticks for albumin and creatinine in urine with visual results and quantitative methods

Three hospital sites evaluated the Bayer two-pad urine dipstick as a screening test for microalbuminuria. One pad estimates albumin concentrations between 10 and 150 mg/L, and the second estimates creatinine values between 300 and 3,000 mg/L. The Boehringer Mannheim (BMD) Micral® dipstick was also compared and evaluated. The accuracy of the dipsticks was judged by comparison with cuvet-based immunonephelometry for albumin and to standard rate-Jaffé methods for creatinine; these assays were well standardized and controlled and were assumed to give accurate values. Precision of these methods and that of the dipsticks was determined by multiple assays of control materials. Visual or instrument (Clinitek 50® or 100®) evaluation of the Bayer or visual checks of the BMD albumin dipstick pad with patients' urines gave clinically acceptable accuracy. The albumin/creatinine ratio from the Bayer dipsticks gave better accuracy for albumin excretion than the albumin pads alone from either manufacturer. This ratio should permit making a good estimate of the 24-hr albumin excretion in a randomly collected urine. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 12:280–284, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Screening school children for albuminuria, proteinuria and occult blood with dipsticks.

Beginning in 1974, the Japanese Ministry of Health Welfare directed the screening of schoolchildren for proteinuria. We studied their procedure and methods in 6197 school children and also evaluated a new urine dipstick that measures albumin concentrations down to about 10 mg/l and creatinine down to about 300 mg/l. We used specimens from adult in- and outpatients to test the accuracy of the dipsticks. Based on the quantitative results, we set as cutoffs < 150 mg/l for protein and < 30 mg/l for albumin as the concentrations representing "low risk." The quantitative values were assumed to be correct, and the dipstick results were judged accordingly, i.e., a dipstick protein of > or = "150" mg/l or an albumin of I "30" mg/l indicated increased risk of developing or having a genitourinary disorder. The sensitivity/specificity of the protein dipstick was 95.1%/95.5%, and the same for the albumin dipstick was 83.8%/93.8%. The cut-off for the albumin dipsticks probably should be set somewhat lower to reduce the number of false negatives and increase the sensitivity of the dipstick. When we compared the quantitative albumin to the protein dipsticks with the above cut-offs, we found the sensitivity/specificity to be 79.3%/94.4%, i.e., much like the albumin dipstick results. The many reports on the association of albuminuria and risk of renal disease recommend that screening should be done for albumin rather than protein. Based on the data from the school children, we estimate that a dipstick albumin of "30" mg/l is borderline increased risk, and that a protein dipstick of "150" mg/l is the same. If we call the dipstick "10" mg/l albumin, "30" mg/l albumin and the "150" mg/l protein results "low risk," then we estimate the prevalence of albuminuria in the school children to be about 2.1% and proteinuria to be about 4.3%. Children with these values should have a quantitative test for albumin and protein. We also tested a dipstick for creatinine and found increasing values with increasing age in both genders; the older boys had significantly higher creatinine values than the older girls and younger boys. For the albumin/creatinine ratio, we found 6028 children with a ratio of < 30 mg/g indicating low risk and 159 children with a ratio of > or = 30 mg/g indicating increased risk. The ratio may be more useful owing to the likely reduction of the number of false negatives and false positives.     

Multisite evaluation of a new dipstick for albumin, protein, and creatinine

The goal of our study was to perform a multisite evaluation of a new urine dipstick called Multistix PROtrade mark (Bayer, Elkhart, IN), which has reagent pads for the simultaneous assay of urinary albumin, protein, and creatinine. Patients' urine specimens were assayed at four sites with these dipsticks and with the familiar Bayer Multistix 10SG dipsticks for protein. The new dipstick pads for albumin are impregnated with bis (3',3"-diiodo-4',4"-dihydroxy-5',5"-dinitrophenyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromo-sulfonephthalein (DIDNTB) dye. These dipsticks also have a novel pad that estimates urinary creatinine using the peroxidase activity of the copper-creatinine complex. We determined the interlaboratory agreement of these dipsticks by comparing dipstick results to values obtained by quantitative analytical methods. We found that dividing the dipsticks' albumin or protein results by the creatinine concentration reduced the number of false-positive albumin or protein values observed in concentrated urines, and reduced the number of false negatives in dilute urines. The ratio of albumin to creatinine, or protein to creatinine gives a better measure of albumin or protein excretion. Compared to reading by eye, the dipstick results agreed better with the quantitative assays when they were read by a reflectometer (Bayer Clinitek).     

Screening for proteinuria in Japanese schoolchildren: a new approach.

By governmental mandate, Japanese school children are screened annually for proteinuria, hematuria, and glucosuria to identify children with possible renal disorders. We added urine dipstick tests for albumin and creatinine to the Japanese screening protocol, and used their dipstick results for blood, glucose and protein. The sulfosalicylic acid precipitation test was used to confirm "trace" positive protein dipsticks. The Japanese and our screening protocol have in common the same data for glucosuria and proteinuria. Their scheme has an algorithm for repeat testing of children with abnormal results, and further testing and medical evaluation for those showing persistently abnormal values. Out of the 23,121 students, we found seven with likely nephritis, one with confirmed nephritis, one with nephrotic syndrome, 170 with persistent unexplained hematuria, 19 with persistent unexplained proteinuria, 14 cases of urinary tract infection, and 20 cases of likely diabetes mellitus. We conclude that dipstick testing for albumin, protein, creatinine, glucose and occult blood has significant value in a multilevel testing scheme for identifying children with urinary tract abnormalities or diabetes. The assay of albumin increases the sensitivity of the screening, and dividing the albumin by the creatinine concentration reduces the potential errors arising from concentrated or dilute urines.     

Clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease in adults: Part II. Glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, and other markers

The Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative of the National Kidney Foundation published clinical practice guidelines on chronic kidney disease in February 2002. Of the 15 guidelines, the first six are of greatest relevance to family physicians. Part II of this two-part review covers guidelines 4, 5, and 6. Glomerular filtration rate is the best overall indicator of kidney function. It is superior to the serum creatinine level, which varies with age, sex, and race and often does not reflect kidney function accurately. The glomerular filtration rate can be estimated using prediction equations that take into account the serum creatinine level and some or all of specific variables (age, sex, race, body size). In many patients, estimates of the glomerular filtration rate can replace 24-hour urine collections for creatinine clearance measurements. Urine dipsticks generally are acceptable for detecting proteinuria. To quantify proteinuria, the ratio of protein or albumin to creatinine in an untimed (spot) urine sample is an accurate alternative to measurement of protein excretion in a 24-hour urine collection. Patients with persistent proteinuria have chronic kidney disease. Other techniques for evaluating patients with chronic kidney disease include examination of urinary sediment, urine dipstick testing for red and white blood cells, and imaging studies of the kidneys (especially ultrasonography). These techniques also can help determine the underlying cause of chronic kidney disease. Family physicians should weigh the value of the National Kidney Foundation guidelines for their clinical practice based on the strength of evidence and perceived cost-effectiveness until additional evidence becomes available on the usefulness of the recommended quality indicators.     

Use of a Urine Dipstick and Brief Clinical Questionnaire to Predict an Abnormal Serum Creatinine in the Emergency Department

Objectives:  Prior data demonstrated that a urine dipstick used alone was a sensitive predictor of abnormal creatinine, but not sufficiently enough to forego screening of serum creatinine prior to administration of contrast for diagnostic studies. The authors hypothesized that a brief historical questionnaire coupled with a urine dipstick would have high sensitivity for renal dysfunction, potentially eliminating the need for a serum creatinine prior to contrast administration.
Methods:  This was a prospective study of a convenience sample of patients at two academic tertiary-care emergency departments (EDs) during 2006–2007. Subjects included patients who had both a serum creatinine result reported by the laboratory and a urine dipstick result reported in the medical record. Data included triage vital signs, basic demographic data, 14 medical history items, dipstick urinalysis, and serum creatinine results. The main outcome measure was an abnormal serum creatinine, defined as greater than 1.5 mg/dL.
Results:  Complete data sets were collected on 1,354 patient visits. Of these, there were 161 (12%) with a serum creatinine of >1.5 mg/dL. Logistic regression analysis identified the following independent predictors associated with elevated creatinine: age greater than 60 years, known renal insufficiency, diabetes, hypertension, diuretic use, vomiting, and proteinuria. Nearly all patients with abnormal creatinine (98%) had at least one of these seven predictors. A decision tool combining these predictors would have identified 158 of 161 patients with an abnormal creatinine (sensitivity, 98.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 95.8% to 99.9%) and a specificity of 21.2% (95% CI = 18.8% to 23.2%).
Conclusions:  The absence of six historical factors and absence of proteinuria can be safely used to identify patients who are unlikely to have an abnormal creatinine.     

Clinical utility of a rapid test for uristatin

OBJECTIVES: Uristatin is a trypsin inhibitor present in urine that is increased in most patients with bacterial or viral infections and in many with inflammatory disorders. We included the assay of uristatin as part of a screening program carried out by pediatricians on 4207 Japanese schoolchildren to judge the ability of uristatin to identify those with an infection and (or) inflammation of any cause. We used urine dipsticks for the assay of uristatin, creatinine, albumin, blood, leukocyte esterase, and protein. We also performed quantitative assays for uristatin and creatinine. Another aim was to estimate the reference range for uristatin in schoolchildren, ages 5 to 14 yr. METHODS: We prepared dipstick pads that were impregnated with a chromogenic substrate for trypsin and measured the uristatin-caused inhibition of trypsin in urine. We measured creatinine so that the ratio of uristatin to creatinine could be calculated to correct for urine concentration. RESULTS: We obtained quantitative uristatin and creatinine results for 4207 children. Of these, 177 had an abnormal urine dipstick for albumin or blood or protein or leukocyte esterase or a combination of these. We used data from 3622 children to establish the reference range for the uristatin dipsticks. The 3622 were diagnosed by their pediatricians as free from an infection or inflammation of any cause and with normal urine dipstick tests. We recommend an upper reference limit for uristatin by dipstick of < or = 7.5 mg uristatin/g creatinine.The leftover 408 children ( [4207-3622-177] = 408) fell into two groups: 205 with diagnoses of no infection, possible infection, or possible inflammatory disorders. The remaining 203 children were renal disease follow-up cases. The diagnoses were based on a physical examination, microscopic urinalysis plus urine dipstick tests for albumin, blood, creatinine, protein, leukocyte esterase and a complete blood count. In the 205 children, 46 had an abnormal uristatin dipstick test, 39 had an abnormal uristatin by immunoassay, 41 had an abnormal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), 27 had an abnormal serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and one had an abnormal urine microscopic exam.For the first 938 children in the study, the agreement was 93% of negative dipstick uristatin results and immunoassays. The agreement of positive uristatin dipsticks with immunoassays was 85%. We assumed that the immunoassay results were correct. In the evaluation of 189 children with fever, 62 also had an abnormal uristatin by dipstick. DISCUSSION: A rapid dipstick test for uristatin read on a reflectance photometer gave values that compared well with a quantitative immunoassay method. The uristatin test is sensitive but not specific for any cause of infection or inflammation. Uristatin is easy to determine and appears to be a better indicator than fever, ESR, or CRP for the diagnosis of an infection or inflammation.     

Quantitative Analysis of Four Types of Primary Glomeropathy by Application of a Decision Forest to Ultrasonic and Laboratory Characteristics

The aim of this study was to apply a decision forest to analysis of the ultrasound characteristics and laboratory test indices of four types of primary glomerulopathy, and quantitative analysis of the four pathologic types using a combination of these two methods. The decision trees were derived from 41 clinical indices and 5 characteristic sonographic indices obtained for the left kidney. Fifty-six patients who had undergone ultrasound-guided renal biopsy were reviewed retrospectively, and on pathologic examination, the patients were diagnosed with primary glomerulopathy, which includes mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis, membranous nephropathy, immunoglobulin A nephropathy and minimal change disease. In this study, eight characteristic indicators were correlated with pathologic type in the 56 cases of primary glomerulopathy. The order calculated by decision forests, from high to low, is proteinuria, length of kidney, serum creatinine, plasma albumin, area of kidney, total protein, thickness of renal parenchyma, 24-h urine protein. The glomerulopathy with the highest ++++ proteinuria is membranous nephropathy, which accounts for 39.2% (22/56) of the total sample; this was followed by minimal change disease, mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis and immunoglobulin A nephropathy. On the basis of our analysis of 41 clinical indices, the key indices for quantitative analysis of primary glomerulonephritis are laboratory tests, and these include urine protein, serum creatinine, plasma albumin, total serum protein and 24-h urine protein. The three key sonographic features are measurement indices: renal length, renal area and renal parenchymal thickness. From the eight characteristic indicators, we observed that with respect to severity (from most severe to least severe), the four types of glomerulopathy are membranous nephropathy, minimal change disease, mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis and immunoglobulin A nephropathy.     

A diagnostic programme for quantitative analysis of proteinuria

A spectrum of quantitative methods was adapted to the Kone Specific Analyser for the purpose of recognizing, quantifying and differentiating various forms of proteinuria. Total protein, IgG, albumin and alpha 1-microglobulin (measured by turbidimetry), N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activity and creatinine (measured photometrically), were measured in undiluted urine; in addition alpha 1-microglobulin was measured in serum. Within and between run precision, accuracy and linearity of the turbidimetric methods were in good agreement with nephelometric procedures. All turbidimetric methods exhibited a correlation coefficient r greater than 0.98 when compared with the radial immunodiffusion procedure as reference method. Total protein measured turbidimetrically with the Kone Specific Analyser was in good agreement with the manual biuret procedure. The low detection limits and linearities allowed quantification of urine analytes from the lower range of normals up to ten times the upper limit of normals. The measured analytes exhibited stability in urine at pH 4-8 over at least seven days at 4-6 degrees C and -20 degrees C. Only IgG showed a significant loss (up to 30 percent), when measured after storage at -20 degrees C. Quantities per mol creatinine showed significantly lower intra-individual and inter-individual variability than quantities per liter. In 31 normal persons, the intraindividual variation was lowest for N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activity (13%) and highest for total protein (33%), when measured in the second morning urine on 5 consecutive days. When related to creatinine, results obtained in the second morning urine showed no significant differences from those in 24 h urine, except for alpha 1-microglobulin which gave lower values in 24 h urines. The upper normal limits, calculated as the 95% ranges, were determined from 154 urines of 31 individuals. Nearly all analytes showed an asymmetric distribution. Because of a wide tailing of the upper limit, preliminary upper normal limits were set above this range: (table; see text) Application of the newly adapted programme to unselected urines sent for urine analysis revealed a threefold increase in the proportion of results outside the normal ranges, compared with the routinely used protein test strip procedure. All additional positive urines exhibited either signs of glomerular or tubular proteinuria. Determination of albumin or N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase excretion was sufficient to detect these additional cases.     

Assay of creatinine using the peroxidase activity of copper-creatinine complexes

OBJECTIVES: It was our goal to develop a urine dipstick that could measure creatinine with a peroxidase reaction. The simultaneous measurement of albumin and creatinine permits the estimation of the 24-h albumin excretion, an important value in judging existing or likely development of renal failure. A highly sensitive dye-binding dipstick method for albumin exists, and a suitable dipstick for the assay for urine creatinine is described here. METHODS: Copper-creatinine and iron-creatinine complexes have peroxidase activity. With 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), and diisopropyl benzene dihydroperoxide (DBDH); the peroxidase activity of copper-creatinine and iron-creatinine complexes can be demonstrated. This reaction was used in the assay of urine creatinine either in solution or by a suitably impregnated urine dipstick. RESULTS: Our method based on the peroxidase activity of the copper-creatinine complex has an analytical range for creatinine of 100 mg/L (0.884 mmol/L) to 3000 mg/L (26.52 mmol/L). The creatinine assay is free from most interfering compounds that may be present in urine. Hemoglobin is an interferent, and its effects can be reduced but not eliminated by the addition of 4-hydroxy-2-methyl quinoline. We do not recommend using the dipsticks when visible blood is present or if the dipstick blood test is positive. The copper-creatinine complex oxidizes ascorbic acid; however, we were able to modify the reaction conditions so that ascorbic acid at < 4.4 g/L does not interfere. We found good agreement on fresh urines between the creatinine dipstick results and those by a standard rate-Jaffe cuvet method for creatinine. DISCUSSION: With the simultaneous measurement of creatinine and albumin in urine, the albumin/creatinine ratio can be determined effectively reducing or eliminating the occasional false-negative and false-positive result in those with dilute or concentrated urines, respectively. The dipstick test for these analytes permits the simple identification of individuals with possible albuminuria and could serve well in a point-of-care setting.     

Urine Dipstick as a Screening Test for Serum Creatinine Elevation in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Hypertension

OBJECTIVE: Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with severe hypertension require assessment for acute end-organ damage. Serum creatinine (SCr) measurement is routinely recommended to detect renal dysfunction. The authors assessed the utility of the urine dipstick test in screening for acute SCr elevation in this population. METHODS: The authors performed a prospective study of adult ED patients with diastolic blood pressures > or = 115 mm Hg that persisted for > or = 30 minutes or necessitated emergent treatment. Excluded were menstruating and pregnant women and patients with urinary infection, trauma, or dialysis dependence. Patients reporting a history of renal disease were excluded if the SCr was abnormal and no baseline value was available. Each subject had an SCr and urine dipstick test. The authors examined the performance of the dipstick in identifying an elevated SCr, defined as SCr > 1.2 mg/dL or > 25% above baseline. RESULTS: Of 143 patients, 42 had SCr > 1.2 mg/dL. Eighteen reported prior renal disease but had an SCr that was normal or < or = 25% above baseline. The remaining 24 subjects comprised the elevated SCr group. The presence of either proteinuria or hematuria on dipstick identified these patients with 100% sensitivity and 29.7% specificity. Specificity rose to 42.4% without loss of sensitivity when an abnormal dipstick was defined as hematuria or > or = 1+ proteinuria. CONCLUSIONS: The urine dipstick may be an effective screening test for SCr elevation in patients with severe hypertension. A restrictive definition of an abnormal dipstick would identify all patients with elevated SCr and substantially reduce the number of SCr assays necessary.     

Submaximal Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Dosing Among Persons With Proteinuria

For persons with proteinuria, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are treatment mainstays for reducing kidney disease progression. Guidelines for managing hypertension and chronic kidney disease recommend titrating to the maximum ACEi/ARB dose tolerated. Using deidentified national electronic health record data from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, we examined ACEi/ARB dosing among adults with proteinuria—defined as either a urine albumin to creatinine ratio of 30 mg/g or greater or a protein to creatinine ratio of 150 mg/g or greater—who were prescribed an ACEi/ARB medication between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018. Among 100,238 included patients (mean age, 65.1 years; 49,523 [49.4%] female), 29,883 (29.8%) were taking maximal ACEi/ARB doses. Among 74,287 patients without potential contraindications to dose escalation (systolic blood pressure <120 mm Hg, estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min per 1.73 m², serum potassium level greater than 5.0 mEq/L, or acute kidney injury within the prior year), the frequency of maximal ACEi/ARB dosing was 32.3% (24,025 patients). In adjusted analyses, age less than 40 years, female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, lower urine albumin to creatinine ratio, lack of diabetes, heart failure, lower blood pressure, higher serum potassium level, and prior acute kidney injury were associated with lower odds of maximal ACEi/ARB dosing. Having a prior nephrologist visit was not associated with maximal dosing. Our results suggest that greater attention toward optimizing the dose of ACEi/ARB therapy may represent an opportunity to improve chronic kidney disease care and reduce excess morbidity and mortality associated with disease progression.     

Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in a middle and old-aged population of Beijing

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was epidemic worldwide. The prevalence of CKD indicators, including proteinuria, hematuria/uninfectious leukocyturia and reduced GFR, was investigated in the middle and old-aged population of Beijing Shijingshan district. METHODS: Subjects of 2310 aged > or =40 y were enrolled. Their health conditions were taken by questionnaires and physical check-ups. Spot urine albumin to creatinine ratio, spot urine dipstick and microscopy for urine red cell and leukocyte, and serum creatinine was determined. Using simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation estimated GFR assessed renal function. The associations between age, gender, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension, and indicators of kidney damage were examined. RESULTS: Through the questionnaires, the history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and CKD were found in 28%, 47.1% and 3.6% of subjects, respectively. Albuminuria was detected in 8.4% of subjects, hematuria and uninfectious leukocyturia in 0.7%, and reduced GFR in 4.9%. Approximately 12.9% had at least 1 indicator of CKD. The known rate of CKD in the studied population was 7.1%. Age, diabetes mellitus, hyper fasting blood glucose and hypertension were independently associated with albuminuria; age, gender, hyper uric acid and albuminuria with reduced GFR. When proteinuria and reduced GFR were determined using spot urine dipstick protein > or =25 mg/dl and serum creatinine > or =133 micromol/l, the prevalence of proteinuria and reduced GFR were 4.7% and 0.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of CKD is common in middle and old-aged population of Beijing, especially in the elderly, but the known rate was relatively low. These findings highlight the clinical and public health importance of CKD.     

Determination of urinary protein fractions. A comparison with different electrophoretic methods and quantitatively determined protein concentrations

The second morning urine of 207 patients with various renal diseases was examined. After testing the urine with the Combur-9-RL((R)) dip strip, the concentrations of total protein, creatinine, albumin, alpha-1-microglobulin, immunoglobulin G and transferrin were determined. The urinary protein fractions were measured in parallel with the electrophoresis kits: Hydragel-Proteinuria (sebia GmbH, Fulda); Protur-HiSi (Beckman Coulter GmbH, Krefeld); SPE-II (Beckman Coulter) and the protein concentrations were calculated. The method comparison was based on the agreement of the ascertained types of proteinuria, and on comparison of the electrophoretically obtained albumin protein concentrations with the automated concentration results. It could be shown that urine electrophoresis is a reliable analytic method for the diagnosis of proteinurias. A good agreement and significant correlations were found between single protein determination and urinary electrophoresis. A diagnostic strategy that combines electrophoresis, single protein determination and immunofixation is useful for the diagnosis and differentiation of proteinuria.     

尿清蛋白与肌酐比值对2型糖尿病肾病的早期诊断价值

目的探讨测定尿清蛋白／肌酐比值对诊断早期糖尿病肾病的价值。方法选取105例2型糖尿病患者,其中包括45例早期糖尿病肾病患者,分别计算尿清蛋白／肌酐比值、24h尿蛋白定量及尿清蛋白排泄率,并比较它们之间的关系。结果早期糖尿病肾病组尿清蛋白／肌酐比值与24h尿蛋白定量及蛋白排泄率呈显著相关性（r=0．921,P〈0．01;r=0．857,P〈0．05）。结论尿清蛋白／肌酐比值是诊断早期糖尿病肾病的一项敏感且可靠的指标。     

尿微量白蛋白/肌酐比值对糖尿病肾病早期诊断价值

目的 探讨尿微量白蛋白/肌酐比值在糖尿病肾病早期诊断中的价值.方法 选取确诊为2型糖尿病患者293例和体检健康体检者70例,对其尿微量白蛋白/肌酐比值（晨起空腹及随机）、24小时尿微量白蛋白定量、尿微量白蛋白排泄率、尿素氮、血肌酐、尿常规等临床资料进行回顾性分析,观察上述不同检测方法对糖尿病早期诊断灵敏度.结果 晨起、随机尿微量白蛋白/肌酐值与尿微量白蛋白排泄率（urine albumin excretion rateUAER）、24 h尿微量白蛋白定量成显著正相关,晨起空腹尿ACR与UAER、24小时尿微量白蛋白定量的相关系数分别为r＝0.936（P＜0 01）,r＝0.906,（P＜0.01）;随机尿ACR与UAER和24h尿微量白蛋白相关系数分别为r＝0.756（P＜0.01）,r＝0.738,（P＜0.01）.2型糖尿病组尿ACR阳性组和阴性组之间比较尿蛋白、血肌酐、尿素氮水平无统计学差异,P＞0.05.将血肌酐、尿素氮、尿ACR诊断糖尿病肾病敏感性比较,尿ACR阳性率显著高于前两者,P＜0.01.结论 晨起空腹及随机尿微量白蛋白/肌酐比值两者均可以作为糖尿病肾病早期诊断的敏感指标.     

胡桃夹综合征患者不同体位尿蛋白定量检测的日内变异分析

目的报道2例胡桃夹综合征患者随机尿微量清蛋白肌酐比(ACR)、总蛋白肌酐比(PCR)与24 h尿总蛋白定量(24hUTP)结果不一致的临床案例,并分析患者不同体位时随机尿蛋白的日内变异。方法用多普勒超声确诊2位患者为胡桃夹综合征,留取2位患者不同体位(平卧、正常活动)24 h期间所有尿标本,检测ACR、PCR、24hUTP,分析不同体位下ACR、PCR的变异及与24hUTP的一致性。结果平卧期间,2位患者随机尿ACR、PCR和24hUTP均在参考区间内,结果均一致;正常活动期间,2位患者随机尿ACR和PCR都有个别异常升高超出参考区间,24hUTP分别是0.21 g/24 h和0.05 g/24 h,结果严重不一致。结论胡桃夹综合征会引起体位性蛋白尿,从而导致患者随机尿蛋白日内变异较大,出现个别随机尿蛋白与24hUTP结果不一致的情况,建议患者用晨起第1次尿和24 h尿来监测尿蛋白的排泄情况。     

Agreement between the ‘point of care’ tests for microalbuminuria and HbA1c performed in mexican family medicine units and the results of standard laboratory tests

The albumin-creatinine ratio is considered an indicator of microalbuminuria, precursor to chronic kidney disease, while HbA1c is used to measure glycemic control. Given the prevalence of diabetes-related nephropathy, spot testing of albumin has long been recommended as a preventative measure, for the timely detection of microalbuminuria. However, many countries do not have this testing available in primary care, and sometimes not even in second- and third-level care. The objective of this study was to compare agreement of the microalbuminuria and HbA1c results obtained in the laboratory with ‘gold standard’ techniques, with those obtained on site with a ‘Point of Care’ DCA Vantage? device by Siemens. Results for the albumin–creatinine ratio and HbA1c from the Siemens DCA Vantage? point of care device were compared with those from standard laboratory tests in 25 family medicine units in Mexico City and Toluca, State of Mexico, in patients diagnosed with type-2 diabetes. Agreement between the albumin values of the 2 tests was 0.745 (CI 95% 0.655–0.812). Agreement between the two measurement techniques for HbA1c was 0.970 (CI 95% 0.966–0.973). The results obtained were sufficiently comparative (R_i=?0.74 for albumin-creatinine ratio and R_i?=?0.97 for HbA1c) to justify the use of the point of care device. Given the high agreement between the point of care device and laboratory tests, this device could be used to identify chronic kidney disease and glycemic control for more adequate treatment in patients with diabetes, especially in remote areas.     

Renal assessment practices and the effect of nurse case management of health maintenance organization patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine baseline renal screening practices and the effect of nurse case management of patients with diabetes in a group model health maintenance organization (HMO). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed both 1-year retrospective and 1-year prospective studies of renal assessment practices and ACE inhibitor usage in a cohort of 133 diabetic patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of a diabetes nurse case management program in a group model HMO. In accordance with American Diabetes Association recommendations, urine dipstick and quantitative protein and microalbuminuria testing rates were calculated. RESULTS: At baseline, 77% of patients were screened for proteinuria with dipsticks or had quantitative urine testing. Of patients with negative dipstick findings, 30% had appropriate quantitative protein or microalbumin follow-up at baseline. Baseline ACE inhibitor usage was associated with decreased follow-up testing (relative risk = 0.47). Nurse case management was associated with increased quantitative protein or or microalbumin testing and increased follow-up testing (relative risk = 1.65 and 1.60, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found a higher degree of adherence to recommendations for renal testing than has been reported previously. Nurse case management intervention further increased renal screening rates. The inverse association between ACE inhibitor usage and microalbumin testing highlights a potentially ambiguous area of current clinical pathways.