Suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of mutations in the mismatch repair genes in families suspected of having hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. METHODS: We devised two criteria for families suspected of having hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Criteria I and II). Criteria I consist of at least two first-degree relatives affected with colorectal cancer with at least one of the following: development of multiple colorectal tumors including adenomatous polyp, at least one colorectal cancer case diagnosed before the age of 50, and occurrence of a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer extracolonic cancer (endometrium, urinary tract, small intestine, stomach, hepatobiliary system, or ovary) in family members. Criteria II consist of one colorectal cancer patient with at least one of the following: early age of onset (<40 years); endometrial, urinary tract, or small intestine cancer in the index patient or a sibling (one aged <50 years); and two siblings with other integral hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer extracolonic cancers (one aged <50 years). A questionnaire was mailed to members of the International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer to determine the mutation detection rate in mismatch repair genes from the families fulfilling these criteria. For comparison the mutation detection rate for families fulfilling the Amsterdam hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer criteria in each institution was also obtained. RESULTS: Data were obtained from eight different institutions (in 7 different countries). In a total of 123 patients from 123 families (67 families fulfilling Criteria I and 56 families fulfilling Criteria II), genetic testing for germline mismatch repair gene variants was performed. Germline mutations of the hMLH1 or hMSH2 genes were identified in 24 families (20 percent). Of these, the mutation detection rate for families fulfilling Criteria I was 28 percent (19/67). The mutation detection rate for families fulfilling Criteria II was 9 percent (5/56). In these eight institutions, the overall mutation detection rate for families fulfilling the Amsterdam hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer criteria was 50 percent (77/154). CONCLUSION: The Criteria I for suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer have the advantages that they can be applied to nuclear families and they can include extracolonic cancers. The results of this study suggest that families fulfilling Criteria I should be offered genetic testing. The relatively low mutation detection rate in those families fulfilling Criteria II suggests that, using current techniques, genetic testing in these families is not practical.     

Cancer risks for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: a population-based early onset case-family study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cancer risks for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers have been derived almost exclusively using families ascertained owing to their strong cancer family history. These may be overestimates, due to analytic problems, and not generalizable. We estimated average cancer risks for mutations identified in population-based early onset colorectal cancer cases (probands) unselected for family history. METHODS: Data were cancer histories and mutation status (carrier, non-carrier, or unknown) of 17 mismatch repair gene mutation carrier probands with colorectal cancer diagnosed before age 45 (8 hMLH1, 4 hMSH2, 4 hMSH6, 1 hPMS2) and their first- and second-degree relatives. We used modified segregation analysis theory, adjusting for the family being ascertained through the proband being an early onset mutation carrier. RESULTS: Eleven carrier probands (64%) were from families meeting the Amsterdam II criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The cumulative risk for colorectal cancer (95% confidence interval) to age 70 was 45% (29%-62%) for men and 38% (19%-51%) for women. Corresponding risks were 67% (47%-84%) and 72% (48%-85%) for any hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer-related cancer. Compared with the general population, colorectal cancer incidence for men was approximately 180-fold higher before age 50, but about the same after age 50. For women, incidence was approximately 100-fold higher before age 50 and 7-fold higher thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: For carriers of the mutations in the mismatch repair genes that cause early onset colorectal cancer, colorectal cancer increases rapidly until age 50, and the incidence decreases to general population levels at older ages.     

Family history and molecular features of children, adolescents, and young adults with colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is extremely rare in childhood. Published case series reporting children and adolescents with colorectal cancer have not focused on the underlying genetic aspects of the tumour or genetic susceptibility of the families. AIMS: We examined a cohort of patients with early onset colorectal cancer to determine whether a specific genetic predisposition could be elucidated. In particular, we focused on whether DNA mismatch repair gene deficiency which causes hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) could be elucidated. METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer 相似文献   

Frequency of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and other colorectal cancer familial forms in Spain: a multicentre, prospective, nationwide study

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer mortality in Western countries. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is the most common type of hereditary colorectal cancer, but its incidence remains controversial, ranging from 1 to 5%. OBJECTIVE: This present prospective, multicentre, nationwide study was aimed at compiling prominent epidemiological and clinical data with respect to hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and other familial colorectal cancer forms in Spain, where information is lacking. METHODS: All patients with a de-novo diagnosis of colorectal cancer and who attended between November 2000 and October 2001 in 25 hospitals all over Spain were registered. Demographic, clinical and tumour-related characteristics of probands, and detailed family history, were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 1872 colorectal cancer patients were included. Clinical diagnosis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer was established in 46 (2.5%) patients according to the Amsterdam II criteria. Comparison between patients fulfilling either the Amsterdam I or the Amsterdam II criteria revealed no differences with respect to demographic, clinical and tumour-related characteristics. A total of 504 (27.0%) patients had a family history of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer-related neoplasm not fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria (familial colorectal cancer), while 360 (19.2%) patients fulfilled at least one of the Bethesda's criteria. CONCLUSION: These clinicoepidemiological data provide a more accurate characterization of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and other familial colorectal cancer forms in Spain, with potential implications in preventive strategies.     

Identification and Classification of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (Lynch Syndrome): Adapting Old Concepts to Recent Advancements. Report from the Italian Association for the Study of Hereditary Colorectal Tumors Consensus Group

Knowledge about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)/Lynch syndrome clearly evolved during the last 10 to 15 years much more rapidly than in the past century. Consequently, long-established concepts and attitudes that held for many years should now be changed or updated. With regard to classification, we suggest maintaining the eponym "Lynch syndrome" for families that have a well-documented deficiency of the DNA mismatch repair system, whereas "clinical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer" should be reserved for those families that meet the Amsterdam criteria but without evidence of mismatch repair impairment. Any family (or individual) meeting one or more of the Bethesda criteria can be considered as suspected HNPCC. For the identification of hereditary colorectal cancer molecular screening or the pedigree analysis show advantages and disadvantages; the ideal would be to combine the two approaches. Diffusion of the microsatellite instability test and of immunohistochemistry in the pathology laboratories might render in the immediate future molecular screening more realistic. Strict endoscopic surveillance of family members at risk (with first colonoscopy at age 20-25 years and then every 2-3 years) is needed only in families with documented alterations of the DNA mismatch repair. To a certain extent, our conclusions were similar to the recently proposed "European guidelines for the clinical management of HNPCC," although we prefer the term "clinical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer," instead of familial colorectal cancer, for families meeting the Amsterdam criteria but not having evidence of mismatch repair impairment.     

Clinical and molecular diagnosis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: problems and pitfalls in an extended pedigree

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (or Lynch syndrome) is an autosomal dominant disease in which early onset colorectal carcinomas aggregate in families together with tumours of other organs. The genetic basis of the syndrome has been clarified with the identification of mutations in several DNA mismatch repair genes (MSH2, MLH1, PMS1, PMS2 and MSH6). We describe the clinical features and molecular characterization of a large hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer family which has been followed for almost 10 years. The kindred showed a striking aggregation of colorectal tumours in 3 successive generations; most of these neoplasms developed before the age of 50 years and were localized in the proximal colon. Molecular tests (carried out in ten individuals) showed specific alterations at the MLH1 gene, consisting in the insertion of a T nucleotide between bases 2,269 and 2,270; the mutation caused frameshift of the open reading frame and synthesis of a polypeptide longer than normal. The only tumour that could be analysed was positive for microsatellite instability. Physicians should become more confident with hereditary tumours and their implications, which are not limited to a single individual but concern all family members at risk of cancer. This family approach is different, and requires more expertise than the traditional individual approach. Common problems encountered in Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer families include: A) poor collaboration of subjects at risk (a situation which may cause some conflict between the doctor's duty to inform patients about their risk of disease and the rights of patients to choose and decide about their health); B) definition of the most appropriate surveillance programme for a given family (how many investigations to propose to the patients, and how often); C) possible interaction between genes and environmental factors (for instance, a gene carrier--in this family--developed an endometrial carcinoma after standard tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for breast cancer).     

Surveillance for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. Mutation carriers have a 60 to 85 percent risk of developing colorectal cancer. In the Netherlands hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families are monitored in an intensive surveillance program. The aim of this study was to examine the stage of the screening-detected tumors in relation to the surveillance interval and to assess the risk of developing colorectal cancer while on the program. METHODS: The Dutch hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer family registry was used. A total of 114 families had a mismatch repair gene defect and/or met the clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The interval between surveillance and colorectal cancer was investigated in initially healthy family members who underwent at least one surveillance examination without showing evidence for colorectal cancer (surveillance group) and in family members who previously underwent partial or subtotal colectomy for colorectal cancer. The risk of colorectal cancer was calculated for proven mutation carriers (surveillance group) and for putative carriers after partial or subtotal colectomy. RESULTS: A total of 35 cancers were detected while on the program. With intervals between colorectal cancer and the preceding surveillance examination of two years or less, tumors were at Dukes Stage A (n = 4), B (n = 11), and C (1). With intervals of more than two years, tumors were at Dukes Stage A (n = 3), B (n = 10), and C (n = 6). The 10-year cumulative risk of developing colorectal cancer was 10.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 3.8–17.2) percent in proven mutation carriers, 15.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 4.1–27.3) percent after partial colectomy, and 3.4 percent after subtotal colectomy. CONCLUSION: There is a substantial risk of developing colorectal cancer while on the program. However, all tumors but one of subjects who underwent a surveillance examination two years or less before detection were at a local stage. We recommend surveillance for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer with an interval of two years or less.     

Undetectable expression of hMLH1 protein in sporadic colorectal cancer with replication error phenotype

PURPOSE: Four DNA mismatch repair genes have been identified as being susceptible genes for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Deficiency of one of the mismatch repair genes causes the replication error phenotype in more than 80 percent of patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and in 10 to 30 percent of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer. To determine which mismatch repair gene is lacking the function in patients with replication error-positive colorectal cancer, several approaches have been used at the nucleic acid and protein levels. We studied replication error in 40 samples of randomly selected colorectal cancers and expression of hMSH2 and hMLH1 proteins analyzed by immunoblot in the tumor and normal tissues of the replication error-positive and replication error-negative samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Frozen tumor and normal tissues were obtained from 40 Japanese patients who had colorectal cancer. According to the Amsterdam criteria, those patients were classified as having 39 sporadic and 1 unknown colorectal cancers. Genomic DNA was extracted from tumor and normal tissues for determining replication error with eight microsatellite markers. Expression of hMSH2 and hMLH1 proteins in cell lysates of tumor and normal tissues of 16 patients was analyzed by immunoblot. RESULTS: The replication error phenotype was found in 6 (15 percent) of the 39 sporadic cases. hMLH1 protein was not detected in two of the six replication error-positive tumor tissues and not in the normal tissues, indicating that the tumor cells of the two patients had severe mutations in both alleles of thehMLH1gene. Another four replication error-positive and ten replication error-negative tumors and normal tissues expressed hMLH1 protein. hMSH2 protein was detected in all samples. CONCLUSION: hMLH1 protein was undetectable in the two tumor tissues of the six replication error-positive samples of sporadic colorectal cancer. The detection procedure used here may have potential use for determining a dysfunctional mismatch repair gene product.     

中国Lynch综合征的过去、现在和将来

遗传性结直肠癌是指基因种系突变所致的结直肠癌,可按孟德尔遗传定律遗传给后代。引起遗传性结直肠癌的一系列疾病称为遗传性结直肠癌综合征。Lynch综合征是最常见的遗传性结直肠癌综合征,致病基因属于错配修复基因家族,具有发病年龄早、肿瘤好发于近端结肠、肠外恶性肿瘤常见等临床特征。本文就我国关于该病的研究,尤其是基因突变研究作一综述,以供国内同行参考。     

Pathogenicity of the hereditary colorectal cancer mutation hMLH1 del616 linked to shortage of the functional protein

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is associated with mismatch repair deficiency. Most predisposing mutations prevent the production of functional mismatch repair protein. Thus, when the wild-type copy is also inactivated, the cell becomes mismatch repair deficient, and this leads to a high degree of microsatellite instability in tumors. However, tumors linked to nontruncating mutations may display positive or partly positive immunohistochemical staining of the mutated protein and low or atypical microsatellite instability status, which suggests impaired functional activity but not a total lack of mismatch repair. We found human mutL homology (hMLH) 1 del616, one of the most widespread recurring mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, segregating in a large hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer family. Because the predicted coding change is a deletion of only 1 amino acid, the pathogenicity of the mutation was evaluated. METHODS: Many analyses were performed to assess the pathogenicity of hMLH1 del616 and to study the expression and function of the mutated messenger RNA and protein. RESULTS: Genetic and immunohistochemical evidence supported hMLH1-linked cancer predisposition in this family. Microsatellite instability varied from low to high, and the hMLH1 protein was lost in 2 tumors but was partly detectable in 1 tumor. Whereas similar optimal amounts of mutated hMLH1 del616 and wild-type hMLH1 proteins were equally functional in an in vitro mismatch repair assay, the amount of in vivo-expressed hMLH1 del616 was much lower than the amount of wild-type protein; this suggests that the deletion imparts instability to the mutant protein. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the pathogenicity of hMLH1 del616 is not linked to nonfunctionality, but to shortage of the functional protein.     

Gastrointestinal cancers and neurofibromatosis type 1 features in children with a germline homozygous MLH1 mutation

Heterozygous germline DNA mismatch repair gene mutations are typically associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The molecular hallmark of this syndrome is high-frequency microsatellite instability in the tumors. Rare childhood cases with homozygous or compound heterozygous DNA mismatch repair gene mutations have a described predisposition to leukemia, lymphoma, and brain tumors but not to gastrointestinal cancer. We have now characterized a family in which 2 children with a homozygous germline DNA mismatch repair gene mutation developed early-onset gastrointestinal cancers. The 11-year-old proband had café-au-lait macules and developed metastatic duodenal adenocarcinoma that arose in a tubulovillous adenoma. His 9-year-old sister with café-au-lait macules and axillary freckling presented with malignant colon polyps. A 6-year-old sister with café-au-lait macules, hairy nevi, and a plexiform neurofibroma of the tongue has no malignancies to date. The family history did not fulfill the Amsterdam criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, but 2 relatives in their 60s had gastric cancer and colorectal cancer, whereas the parents, who are first cousins, remain cancer free. The proband's metastatic duodenal cancer and his sister's malignant colon polyps had high-frequency microsatellite instability but had detectable MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 proteins by immunohistochemistry. Because some germline DNA mismatch repair gene deficiencies are associated with apparently intact immunohistochemical DNA mismatch repair gene expression in tumors, we proceeded to DNA sequencing, which showed that all 3 children had a germline homozygous MLH1 missense mutation (exon 18, codon 687, CGG-->TGG), whereas both parents were heterozygous for this mutation.     

Mismatch repair gone awry: Management of Lynch syndrome

The hallmark of Lynch syndrome involves germline mutations of genes important in DNA mismatch repair. Affected family kindreds will have multiple associated malignancies, the most common of which is colorectal adenocarcinoma. Recently, evidence has shown that clinical diagnostic criteria provided by the Amsterdam Criteria and the Bethesda Guidelines must be linked with microsatellite instability testing to correctly diagnose Lynch syndrome. We present a case of metachronous colorectal adenocarcinomas in a patient less than 50 years of age, followed by a discussion of Lynch syndrome, with an emphasis on surveillance and prevention of malignancies.     

遗传性非息肉病性大肠癌的研究进展

遗传性非息肉病性大肠癌(HNPCC)是一种由错配修复基因(MMR)突变造成的常染色体显性遗传病,又称Lynch综合征,是遗传性大肠癌的代表.HNPCC约占全部大肠癌的5%-15%.错配修复基因(MMR)的种系突变和微卫星不稳定(MSI)是其分子遗传学基础.HNPCC的临床病理特点突出,具有右半结肠多见、发病早、病理分化差、多原发癌多见的特点.目前其治疗方法以手术为主,COX-2阻滞剂可能成为HNPCC治疗的一个新的途径.近年来分子生物学的进展也为人们对HNPCC生物学行为和治疗的认识提供了有益的参考.     

Microsatellite instability—a useful diagnostic tool to select patients at high risk for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: a study in different groups of patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnosis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is based on a typical family history. As molecular genetic testing is predominantly restricted to these families, gene carriers not meeting the clinical criteria may be missed. AIMS: To examine the value of microsatellite instability (MSI) as a tool to increase the likelihood for uncovering a mismatch repair germline mutation in patients with colorectal cancer and to identify a genotype-phenotype relation in families with verified mutations. METHODS: Systematic search for germline mutations (hMSH2 and hMLH1 genes) was performed in 96 patients: 57 fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria (group 1) and 12 the looser HNPCC criteria (group 2). Seventeen patients showed familial clustering of cancers (group 3) and 10 patients under 50 years had sporadic cancer (group 4), the latter of whom all exhibited MSI+ tumours. RESULTS: A similar proportion of germline mutations was found in patients who fulfilled the clinical criteria of HNPCC and had MSI+ tumours (groups 1 and 2; 15/39) compared with patients who did not meet these clinical criteria but who had MSI+ tumours (groups 3 and 4; 8/27 patients). Affected relatives of patients with hMLH1 mutations showed a significantly higher frequency of colorectal cancer but a lower frequency of endometrium cancer than those with hMSH2 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: MSI in tumour tissue is a useful criterion for selecting patients who should be tested for germline mutations in the mismatch repair genes hMSH2 and hMLH1 irrespective of their family history. Among carriers of hMSH2 mutations the tumour spectrum was broader than among carriers of hMLH1 mutations.     

Hereditary colorectal cancer]

Hereditary syndromes cause approximately 5 to 15% of overall colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. Hereditary CRC is conventionally divided into two major categories: hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and those related to polyposis syndromes including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Peutz-Jegher syndrome (PJS), and juvenile polyposis (JP). The screening for the cancer and methods of treatment applied to patients with hereditary CRC are quite different from those applied to the general population. The genes responsible for these syndromes has recently identified, as a result, genetic testing has become the most important determining factor in clinical decisions. Germ-line mutation of the APC gene induces FAP, an autosomal dominant disorder, characterized by the development of hundreds to thousands of colonic adenomas. CRC appears in almost all affected individuals by the time they are 50 years of age. An affected individual should undergo colectomy by his/her late teens. Furthermore, according to the findings of genetic testing, at-risk family members also need endoscopic surveillance and surgery. Recently, a mutation on the MYH gene is increasingly being investigated in patients with multiple polyps, and autosomal recessive MYH polyposis is considered to be a new category of polyposis. More common than FAP, HNPCC is caused by germ-line mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes, mainly MLH1 and MSH2. Although there is no polyposis, polyps seem to be more villous and dysplastic and appear to grow rapidly into CRCs. The aggregate lifetime risk of CRC is about 80% for mutation carriers. The risk for other types of cancer, such as endometrial, ovarian, small bowel, and transitional cell cancer, is also increased. The Amsterdam criteria and Bethesda guidelines are the best-known tools for diagnosis and genetic testing, and colectomy followed by endoscopic follow-up is the standard treatment. PJS and JP are reported to be characterized by hamartomatous polyps throughout the GI tract and germ-line mutations in the STK11 gene (PJS) and the DPC4/BMPR1A gene (JP).     

In a resource-poor country, mutation identification has the potential to reduce the cost of family management for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: Colonoscopic surveillance of family members at risk of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is difficult in a resource-poor country because of its expense. For family members who live in remote areas, poor communication and limited access to sophisticated medical care make surveillance even more difficult. The identification of the mutation causing the disease will simplify surveillance. Our aim was to assess the impact of mutation analysis on the management of a South African family with more than 150 members at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. METHODS: We studied a family that met the Amsterdam criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer affected 27 members in three generations (evidence from histology in 12, barium enema in 1, and family statements in 14 family members). Leukocyte DNA from family members was tested for linkage to candidate loci for colorectal cancer, and DNA from formalin-fixed cancers from six family members was studied for microsatellite instability. DNA from all available family members was then screened for mutations in thehMLH1 gene. The number of individuals at 50 percent risk was calculated by family pedigree and compared with the number who have the mutation. RESULTS: A disease-causing mutation in exon 13 ofhMLH1 segregated with the disorder in members of this kindred. Test results of 100 chromosomes from population-matched controls were negative. Sixty family members between the ages of 16 and 50 years are at 50 percent risk for colon cancer by pedigree analysis, but of these, only 26 (43 percent) have the mutation. CONCLUSION: A mutation in the DNA repair genehMLH1 was found in family members with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and in some unaffected relatives previously at 50 percent risk, but not in unrelated subjects. The blood test for the mutation will simplify management, counseling, and surveillance and help to establish prophylactic colectomy.Supported by The De Beers Chairman's Fund, The Fogarty International Research Foundation, Mauerberger Foundation, The Harry Crossley Foundation, The South African Medical Research Council, The Cancer Association of South Africa, The International Atomic Energy Agency (Vienna), The University of Cape Town Staff Research Fund, and the United States Public Health Service.Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 22 to 26, 1997.     

The genetics of HNPCC: application to diagnosis and screening

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC; Lynch Syndrome) is the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancers. Predisposed individuals have increased lifetime risk of developing colorectal, endometrial and other cancers. The syndrome is primarily due to heterozygous germline mutations in one of the mismatch repair genes; mainly MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. The resulting mismatch repair deficiency leads to microsatellite instability which is the hallmark of tumors arising within this syndrome, as well as a variable proportion of sporadic tumors. Diagnostic guidelines and criteria for molecular testing of suspected families have been proposed and are continuously updated. However, not all families fulfilling these criteria show mutations in mismatch repair genes and/or microsatellite instability implicating other, as yet unknown, carcinogenic mechanisms and predisposition genes. This subset of tumors is the focus of current clinical and molecular research. This review addresses recent advances in the field of HNPCC research and their applications in the management of affected individuals and families.