Effect of 150-mg vs 300-mg loading doses of clopidogrel on platelet function in Japanese patients undergoing coronary stent placement

BACKGROUND: The loading dose of ticlopidine is 500 mg in both the US and Europe and 200 mg in Japan. A lower loading dose of clopidogrel might achieve adequate platelet inhibition in Japanese patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Platelet aggregation was serially measured at baseline, and 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after 150-mg (n=20) and 300-mg (n=20) clopidogrel loading. Platelets were stimulated with 5 and 20 micromol/L adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and aggregation was assessed by optical aggregometry. Pretreatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation in the 150-mg clopidogrel group did not differ from that of the 300-mg group. The administration of 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose resulted in lower platelet aggregation 2 h after the administration (5 micromol/L ADP: 53+/-9% vs 61+/-12%, p<0.05 and 20 micromol/L ADP: 61+/-10% vs 68+/-9%, p<0.05). A lower platelet aggregation induced with 20 micromol/L ADP was still observed 4 h after the 300-mg clopidogrel loading (58+/-10% vs 65+/-9%, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 150-mg clopidogrel loading does not achieve rapid platelet inhibition. The 300-mg loading dose should be used to suppress platelet function rapidly even in Japanese patients undergoing coronary stent placement.     

Antiplatelet effect of 50-mg maintenance dose of clopidogrel compared to 200 mg ticlopidine: a preliminary study

In the United States and Europe, patients with coronary stents are maintained on 75 mg clopidogrel. Because the maintenance dose of ticlopidine in patients with coronary stents is 100 mg twice daily in Japan and 250 mg twice daily in the United States and Europe, in Japanese patients a lower dose of clopidogrel may achieve an antiplatelet effect comparable to 200 mg ticlopidine. Platelet aggregation was evaluated in 104 consecutive patients on 50 mg clopidogrel plus aspirin (n = 54) and 200 mg ticlopidine plus aspirin (n = 50). Platelets were stimulated with adenosine diphosphate (5 and 20 μmol/l) and aggregation was assessed by optical aggregometry. There was no significant difference in platelet aggregation induced with 5 (37% ± 11% vs 38% ± 15%, not significant) and 20 μmol/l adenosine diphosphate (48% ± 13% vs 51% ± 12%, not significant) between 50 mg clopidogrel and 200 mg ticlopidine. In Japanese patients, there is the possibility that a maintenance dose of 50 mg clopidogrel on platelet inhibition is comparable to 200 mg ticlopidine.     

High clopidogrel loading dose during coronary stenting: effects on drug response and interindividual variability.

AIM: To assess platelet inhibitory effects, interindividual variability in platelet inhibition as well as response to a 600 mg, compared to a standard 300 mg, clopidogrel loading dose (LD) after coronary stenting METHODS AND RESULTS: Platelet function profiles were assessed in 50 patients undergoing coronary stenting receiving either a 300 mg (n=27) or 600 mg clopidogrel LD. ADP (6 microM) and collagen (6 microg/mL) induced platelet aggregation, as well as ADP (2 microM) induced glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa activation and P-selectin expression were assessed at baseline and 4, 24, and 48 h following clopidogrel front-loading. A more intense and rapid inhibition of platelet activation (both GP IIb/IIIa activation and P-selectin expression) were achieved using a 600 mg, compared to a 300 mg, LD throughout the entire 48 hours (p<0.001). Although there were no differences in platelet aggregation, overall a 600 mg LD increased the number of clopidogrel responders and this was also achieved earlier compared to a 300 mg LD. A 600 mg LD did not reduce interindividual variability of platelet response. CONCLUSION: The use of a 600 mg clopidogrel LD in patients undergoing coronary stenting optimises platelet inhibitory effects early after intervention and may provide a more effective protection against early thrombotic complications.     

The relation of dosing to clopidogrel responsiveness and the incidence of high post-treatment platelet aggregation in patients undergoing coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES: We determined the effect of clopidogrel dosing on the incidence of nonresponsiveness (NR) and high post-treatment platelet aggregation (post-PA). BACKGROUND: We have reported NR after a 300-mg loading dose. Limited information is available on the comparative effect of a 600-mg loading dose on the incidence of NR and high post-PA. METHODS: Clopidogrel responsiveness and post-PA were measured in patients undergoing stenting (n = 190) randomly treated with either a 300-mg or a 600-mg clopidogrel load. Nonresponsiveness was defined as <10% absolute change in platelet aggregation, and high post-PA was defined as >75th percentile aggregation after 300 mg clopidogrel. RESULTS: Nonresponsiveness was lower after 600 mg compared to the 300-mg dose (8% vs. 28% and 8% vs. 32% with 5 and 20 microM ADP, respectively, p < 0.001). Among the patients with high post-PA after 300 mg clopidogrel, 62% to 65% had NR, whereas after the 600-mg dose, all of the patients with high post-PA had NR. CONCLUSIONS: A 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose reduces the incidence of NR and high post-PA as compared to a 300-mg dose. Higher dosing strategies and methods to confirm platelet inhibition should be further investigated in order to optimally use clopidogrel in patients undergoing stenting.     

Clopidogrel tapering as a strategy to attenuate platelet rebound phenomenon in patients with bare-metal stents

Early clustering of adverse cardiovascular events after abrupt cessation of clopidogrel has been reported in patients with acute coronary syndromes. A platelet rebound phenomenon may contribute to this increased thrombotic risk and a gradual drug tapering may attenuate this proposed platelet effect. Accordingly, we aimed to assess the effect of clopidogrel tapering on platelet reactivity. Twenty patients who underwent elective percutaneous coronary interventions with bare metal stents receiving 3 months of clopidogrel therapy (75 mg daily) were randomized to either of two discontinuation strategies: (1) Off group–abrupt drug cessation or (2) Tapering group–receiving clopidogrel 75 mg every other day for 4 weeks duration. Light transmission aggregometry, induced by ADP (5 and 10 μM) and collagen, was measured at four time-points (at baseline and 2, 4 and 6 weeks after randomization). In the off group, there was an early rise in platelet reactivity at 2 weeks after abrupt drug cessation compared to baseline, as measured by ADP 5 μmol/l (39.6 ± 2.8 vs. 67.9 ± 6.0, P < 0.001). The tapering regimen suppressed this rebound platelet aggregation by ADP 5 μmol/l at 2 weeks (P = 0.001) and 4 weeks (P = 0.001). Similar results were found with ADP 10 μmol/l and collagen agonists. Abrupt cessation of clopidogrel results in an early rise in platelet aggregability in patients with BMS that is attenuated by a tapering regimen. Clopidogrel administration every other day may achieve similar levels of platelet inhibition as full dose therapy. Further investigations evaluating clopidogrel tapering strategies and their potential clinical impact are warranted.     

Is a 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose sufficient to inhibit platelet function early after coronary stenting? A platelet function profile study

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel combined to aspirin reduces the early risk of stent thrombosis and a clopidogrel pre-treatment strategy is associated with a better outcome. However, in clinical practice such pre-treatment strategy is not always feasible and clopidogrel is frequently not administered until the time of intervention. Aim of the study was to compare platelet function profiles in patients undergoing coronary stenting receiving clopidogrel pre-treatment (75 mg x 2 daily at least 48 hours before intervention) compared to that of patients receiving a 300 mg loading dose at intervention time. METHODS: A total of 50 patients were included in whom patients' platelet aggregation (using light transmittance aggregometry) and platelet activation (P-selectin and PAC-1 expression by whole blood flow cytometry) were assessed following ADP stimuli at baseline, and 4 hours and 24 hours following coronary stenting. RESULTS: In the overall study population, 16/50 (32%) patients were pre-treated with clopidogrel and 34/50 (68%) received clopidogrel loading dose at intervention time. Platelet aggregation, as well as P-selectin and PAC-1 expression were significantly lower in clopidogrel pre-treated patients at baseline (p<0.001) and at 4 hours (p<0.01), while they were similarly inhibited 24 hours after intervention. In conclusion, platelet reactivity of patients treated with clopidogrel front loading at intervention time remains significantly higher than that of pre-treated patients in the early hours after coronary stenting. A higher loading dose at intervention time may be warranted to overcome the early risk of thrombotic complications.     

Aspirin and clopidogrel drug response in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the role of dual drug resistance.

We evaluated the response to clopidogrel among aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients undergoing elective coronary stenting. Patients (n = 150) treated with aspirin but not clopidogrel had blood samples drawn at baseline and 24 h after clopidogrel loading. Depending on the definition used, 9% to 15% were resistant to aspirin and 24% to clopidogrel. About half of the aspirin-resistant patients were also resistant to clopidogrel. As a group, aspirin-resistant patients had lower response to clopidogrel (assessed by platelet aggregation and activation markers) than aspirin-sensitive patients. Both aspirin- and clopidogrel-resistant patients had higher incidence of creatine kinase-MB elevation than the respective sensitive patients. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the response to clopidogrel among aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Wide variability has been reported in response to aspirin and clopidogrel. There are limited data on the simultaneous responses to both drugs. METHODS: Elective PCI patients (n = 150) who received aspirin for > or = 1 week but not clopidogrel were included. All patients received bivalirudin during PCI. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and 20 to 24 h after a 300-mg clopidogrel dose. Aspirin resistance was defined by > or = 2 of 3 criteria: rapid platelet function analyzer-ASA score > or = 550, 5 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation > or = 70%, and 0.5 mg/ml arachidonic acid-induced aggregation > or = 20%. Clopidogrel resistance was defined as baseline minus post-treatment aggregation < or = 10% in response to 5 and 20 micromol/l ADP. RESULTS: Nineteen (12.7%) patients were resistant to aspirin and 36 (24%) to clopidogrel. Nine (47.4%) of the aspirin-resistant patients were also clopidogrel resistant. Aspirin-resistant patients were more likely to be women and have diabetes than were aspirin-sensitive patients. They also had lower response to clopidogrel, assessed by platelet aggregation and activation markers (flow cytometry-determined PAC-1 binding and P-selectin expression). Elevation of creatine kinase-myocardial band after stenting occurred more frequently in aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients (38.9% vs. 18.3%; p = 0.04) and in clopidogrel-resistant versus clopidogrel-sensitive patients (32.4% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin-resistant patients as a group have reduced response to clopidogrel. Furthermore, we have identified a unique group of dual drug-resistant patients who may be at increased risk for thrombotic complications after PCI.     

Comparison of antiplatelet effect of loading dose of clopidogrel versus abciximab during coronary intervention.

Randomized clinical trials have evidently shown that the addition of thienopyridines or abciximab to standard aspirin results in a significant reduction of ischaemic complications after coronary stent implantation. A head-to-head comparison of these antithrombotic drug regimens during coronary intervention is, however, lacking, and this was the main aim of the present study. Thirty-nine patients with angina pectoris who were scheduled for coronary stent implantation were assigned to either group 1 (160 mg aspirin + 500 mg ticlopidine post-stent), group 2 (160 mg aspirin + abciximab + 500 mg ticlopidine post-stent) or group 3 (160 mg aspirin + loading dose (375/450 mg) clopidogrel pre-stent and 75 mg clopidogrel post-stent). A loading dose of 450 mg clopidogrel was found to be more effective than the standard loading dose of 375 mg. Platelet aggregation induced by 4 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was assessed in samples collected before intervention and 10 min, 4 h and 20 h after intervention. Before intervention, a moderate antiplatelet effect because of aspirin intake was observed (ADP aggregation level, +/- 50%) in all study groups. After intervention, platelet aggregation tended to be enhanced in group 1 while it was strongly inhibited in the groups pre-treated with clopidogrel or abciximab: ADP induced an aggregation level early after intervention of 60 +/- 12% in group 1 (ticlopidine post-stenting) versus 30 +/- 10% in group 3 (loading dose clopidogrel) versus 3 +/- 6% in group 2 (abciximab). Abciximab achieved a more complete inhibition of aggregation than clopidogrel (P = 0.007). The overall complication rate was low with only one major bleeding and one death due to side-branch occlusion with re-infarction occurring, both in the abciximab group. Platelet aggregation during coronary intervention is strongly inhibited by both abciximab and by high loading dose of clopidogrel. Although abciximab showed a stronger antiplatelet effect than clopidogrel, it remains to be established whether this ex vivo superiority of abciximab also translates into an overall clinical benefit in patients with elective stent implantation.     

Impact of the degree of peri-interventional platelet inhibition after loading with clopidogrel on early clinical outcome of elective coronary stent placement.

OBJECTIVES: Our prospective study tested the hypothesis that the 30-day clinical outcome of elective percutaneous catheter intervention (PCI) differs between strata defined by quartiles of platelet aggregation after loading with 600 mg clopidogrel. BACKGROUND: Platelet responses after loading with clopidogrel are highly variable. The impact of this variability on the peri-interventional risk of patients undergoing PCI has not been investigated prospectively. METHODS: Our study included 802 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary stent placement. Before PCI, patients received a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel followed by 75 mg daily. Primary end point was the 30-day composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (major adverse cardiac events [MACE]). Platelet aggregation was assessed immediately before PCI by optical aggregometry (5 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate). RESULTS: During 30-day follow-up, 15 patients (1.9%) incurred MACE (3 deaths, 8 myocardial infarctions, 8 target lesion revascularizations). Quartiles of platelet aggregation were <4%, 4% to 14%, 15% to 32%, and >32%. Thirty-day MACE differed significantly (p = 0.034) between quartiles of platelet aggregation. It was 0.5% in the first quartile, 0.5% in the second, 3.1% in the third, and 3.5% in the fourth. Platelet aggregation above the median carried a 6.7-fold risk (95% confidence interval 1.52 to 29.41; p = 0.003) of 30-day MACE. Multivariable logistic regression analysis, including pertinent covariables, confirmed platelet aggregation as a significant independent predictor of 30-day MACE (adjusted odds ratio per 10% increase in platelet aggregation 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.61; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: The level of platelet aggregation immediately before elective coronary stenting in patients pre-treated with a high loading dose of clopidogrel is correlated with early outcome after the procedure.     

择期冠状动脉介入治疗患者氯吡格雷抵抗现象的观察

目的:利用流式细胞术观察择期冠状动脉介入治疗患者所服用药物氯吡格雷的作用特点及氯吡格雷抵抗现象。方法:选取60例择期冠状动脉介入治疗患者,在服用氯吡格雷前、术前(服药后5天)、术后2小时及术后5天分别采血,利用流式细胞术测定其二磷酸腺苷诱导的血小板聚集率及血小板表面活化的糖蛋白Ⅱb/Ⅲa复合物(PAC-1)的表达情况。结果:60例患者在服用氯吡格雷前及术后5天的血小板聚集率和PAC-1的表达基本符合正态分布曲线。氯吡格雷抵抗的发生率在术前为25%,术后2h为30%,术后5天为13%。不同基础血小板聚集率组中,术后2h氯吡格雷抵抗发生率无明显差别(P>0.05)。结论:在择期冠状动脉介入治疗患者中,氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用存在个体差异,部分患者存在氯吡格雷抵抗现象。氯吡格雷抵抗可能不受基础血小板聚集率高低的影响。     

Effect of 300- and 450-mg clopidogrel loading doses on membrane and soluble P-selectin in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation

Background After coronary artery stent implantation patients are treated with the adenosine diphosphatase (ADP) receptor antagonist clopidogrel to prevent subacute stent thromboses. Today these patients initially receive a loading dose of 300 mg of clopidogrel to accelerate the complete drug effect. In the current study we investigated whether a higher loading dose can shorten the time until the maximum platelet inhibitory effect of clopidogrel is achieved. Methods P-selectin expression of nonstimulated and ADP-stimulated platelets was flow cytometrically measured before the clopidogrel loading dose and on 3 consecutive days in 52 patients with coronary artery disease: 21 patients in group 1 received 300 mg of clopidogrel after stent implantation and 11 patients in group 2 received the higher 450-mg clopidogrel loading dose followed by a daily dose of 75 mg of clopidogrel for both groups. The control group consisted of 20 patients who were monitored over 2 days before coronary intervention. Soluble P-selectin levels in plasma were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Inducible P-selectin expression on ADP-stimulated platelets was significantly reduced (P = .05) on days 1 and 2 in patient group 2 (450-mg loading dose) compared with group 1 (300-mg loading dose). No influence of clopidogrel on the P-selectin levels in plasma was observed. Conclusions In our study the application of 450 mg of clopidogrel as the loading dose in patients undergoing coronary stenting shortens the period until the maximum effect of the ADP receptor antagonist is achieved and thus may lead to a more successful prevention of subacute coronary stent thromboses. (Am Heart J 2002;143:118-23.)     

P2Y12 gene H2 haplotype is not associated with increased adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation after initiation of clopidogrel therapy with a high loading dose.

A large variability in the antiplatelet response to clopidogrel has been consistently reported. Recently, a P2Y12 haplotype was shown to be associated with enhanced adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation in healthy volunteers. The aim of this study was to test in patients (n = 416) scheduled for coronary artery stenting whether P2Y12 haplotype H2 carriage is associated with increased ADP-induced platelet aggregation after administration of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel. Blood was drawn from the arterial sheath at least 2 h after administration of 100 mg aspirin and 600 mg clopidogrel. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was assessed in platelet-rich plasma with light-transmission aggregometry. P2Y12 haplotypes (H1/H2) and P2Y12 C32T genotypes were determined with TaqMan assays. Haplotype combinations and genotypes were not associated with parameters of ADP-induced platelet aggregation after administration of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel. Maximal ADP (5 mumol/l)-induced platelet aggregation was similar in patients carrying haplotype H2 and homozygous carriers of haplotype H1 (43.9 +/- 21.4 versus 43.2 +/- 21.1%, respectively; P = 0.77). Carriage of P2Y12 H2 haplotype does not seem to affect the platelet response to a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel in coronary artery disease patients prior to stenting.     

Comparison of platelet P2Y(12) ADP receptor-mediated pathway inhibition in triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy as assessed by VASP-phosphorylation in Japanese patients undergoing coronary stenting

Despite wide interindividual variability in response to clopidogrel, platelet P2Y(12) ADP receptor inhibition in Japanese patients has not been fully studied using specific methodology. This study compared platelet P2Y(12) ADP receptor inhibition during treatment with clopidogrel versus clopidogrel plus cilostazol in patients undergoing coronary stenting. Forty-two patients in whom platelet function was measured within 2 months after coronary stenting were enrolled. All patients were treated with aspirin 100 or 200 mg/day, and were divided into a dual therapy group (aspirin plus clopidogrel 75 mg/day; n = 34) and a triple therapy group (aspirin plus clopidogrel 75 mg/day plus cilostazol 200 mg/day; n = 8). Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation analysis and 5 and 20 μmol/L-induced maximal platelet aggregation were assessed. No differences were found in baseline characteristics except for a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in the triple therapy group. Although there were no differences in platelet aggregation between the 2 groups, VASP index was significantly lower in the triple therapy group than in the dual therapy group (23.1 ± 15.3% versus 51.2 ± 19.9%; P = 0.001). The rate of low responsiveness to clopidogrel, defined by VASP index > 50%, was lower in the triple therapy group than in the dual therapy group (12.5% versus 55.9%; P = 0.047). Similarly, in DM patients the triple therapy group had a lower VASP index compared with the dual therapy group (23.1 ± 15.3% versus 47.0 ± 23.5%; P = 0.015).Clopidogrel plus cilostazol is more effective in inhibiting the platelet P2Y(12) ADP receptor pathway than clopidogrel alone. This may be useful for reducing clopidogrel resistance in Japanese patients.     

Antiplatelet effects of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel are not attenuated in patients receiving atorvastatin or simvastatin for at least 4 weeks prior to coronary artery stenting.

AIMS: To test prospectively whether the antiplatelet effect of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel is attenuated in patients receiving atorvastatin and simvastatin for at least 4 weeks prior to coronary artery stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Blood samples were obtained at least 2 h after receiving 100 mg aspirin and 600 mg clopidogrel and prior to coronary stenting from 90 patients without statin therapy and 90 patients with statin (atorvastatin and simvastatin) therapy for at least 4 weeks. Maximal and residual platelet aggregation was evaluated with optical aggregometry in response to ADP (5 and 20 micromol/l). Surface expression of IIb/IIIa (CD61) and P-selectin (CD62) was assessed with whole blood flow-cytometry at baseline and following stimulation (5 and 20 micromol/l ADP). Inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation was not impaired in the presence of concomitant statin therapy. Moreover, patients with and without statin therapy did not differ in respect to all flow-cytometric parameters obtained. CONCLUSION: The antiplatelet effect of a high, 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel is not diminished in patients receiving atorvastatin and simvastatin for at least 4 weeks prior to coronary stenting.     

Week-Long High-Maintenance Dose Clopidogrel Regimen Achieves Better Platelet Aggregation Inhibition than a Standard Loading Dose before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Adequate platelet inhibition before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces periprocedural and long-term ischemic complications. Reduced response to clopidogrel has been associated with subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events. Strategies to optimize platelet inhibition pre-PCI are under investigation. This study evaluated the effect on platelet aggregation of four different dosing regimens of clopidogrel given before elective PCI in a randomized, prospective, double-blind, and placebo-controlled design.
Methods: One hundred twenty participants were randomized to one of four groups of clopidogrel: (a) 300 mg on the day prior to angiography; (b) 600 mg on the day prior to angiography; (c) 300 mg followed by 75 mg daily started 1 week prior to angiography; and (d) 300 mg followed by 150 mg daily started 1 week prior to angiography. Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate 20 μM at baseline and at the time of diagnostic coronary angiography. The absolute change in platelet aggregation between these two time points was considered the main outcome measure.
Results: At the time of diagnostic coronary angiography, the 300-mg/150-mg daily regimen achieved the greatest decrease in platelet aggregation (37 ± 19%), while the 300 mg regimen provided the smallest (20 ± 22%), an absolute difference between the two groups of 17.2 ± 5.1% (P = 0.005).
Conclusions: A 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel followed by 150 mg daily for 1 week prior to coronary angiography provides more effective platelet inhibition, as defined by LTA, compared to the standard 300-mg loading dose regimen at the time of coronary intervention.     

Sulfonylureas and on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

Clopidogrel is a prodrug that needs to be converted in vivo by several cytochrome (CYP) P450 iso-enzymes to become active. Both clopidogrel and the oral hypoglycemic drug class sulfonylureas are metabolized by the iso-enzyme CYP2C9. The objective of the study was to evaluate the relationship of sulfonylureas and on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients undergoing elective coronary stent implantation. In this prospective, observational study, on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity was quantified using adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced light transmittance aggregometry in 139 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients undergoing elective coronary stent implantation treated with clopidogrel and aspirin. High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity was defined as >70.7% platelet reactivity to 20?µmol/L ADP. A total of 53 patients (38.1%) were on concomitant treatment with sulfonylureas. The remaining 86 patients were on other hypoglycemic drugs. On-clopidogrel platelet reactivity was significantly higher in patients with concomitant sulfonylurea treatment as compared to patients without concomitant sulfonylurea treatment (for 5?µmol/L ADP: 46.0%?±?11.8 vs. 40.6%?±?16.0; p?=?0.035, adjusted p?=?0.032 and for 20?µmol/L ADP: 64.6%?±?10.8 vs. 58.7%?±?15.5; p?=?0.019, adjusted p?=?0.017). The concomitant use of sulfonylureas was associated with a 2.2-fold increased risk of high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1–4.7, p?=?0.039 and after adjustment for confounders: OR_adj 2.0, 95% CI 1.0–5.7, p?=?0.048). Concomitant treatment with sulfonylureas might be associated with decreased platelet inhibition by clopidogrel in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients on dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing elective coronary stent implantation.     

Onset and extent of platelet inhibition by clopidogrel loading in patients undergoing elective coronary stenting: the Plavix Reduction Of New Thrombus Occurrence (PRONTO) trial

Background Despite the common practice of clopidogrel loading for coronary stenting, the time dependence and degree of platelet inhibition after this therapy are not well defined. We sought to establish an optimal clopidogrel dosing regimen for sustained platelet inhibition in stented patients. Methods and Results Platelets were assessed by conventional aggregation with 5 μmol/L adenosine diphosphate (ADP), 1 μg/mL collagen (COLL), and 750 μmol/L arachidonic acid; whole blood aggregation by 1 μg/mL collagen (WBA); shear-induced closure time (CT); contractile force (CF); and expression of 9 surface receptors by flow cytometry in 100 patients undergoing elective stent placement without glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists. Blood was obtained at baseline and serially over 5 days poststenting after different clopidogrel loading regimens: 300 mg 24 hours before (Group A), 12 hours before (Group B), 3 to 6 hours before (Group C), and 75 mg at the time of intervention (Group D). Before stenting, ADP, COLL, CT, and WBA were reduced by clopidogrel loading (P < .05). CF was not affected by clopidogrel. Before stenting, GP IIb/IIIa expression increased in groups A through C (P < .05), whereas PECAM-1 and CD107a were reduced (P < .05). At 2 hours and 2 days poststenting, platelets, in general, exhibited an increase in activity that was most inhibited by clopidogrel loading. Clopidogrel inhibited GP Ib, platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, CD 107a, CD 151, and GP IIb/IIIa expression at day 5 poststenting. Conclusion A 300 mg clopidogrel load given 3 to 24 hours before stenting inhibits platelets at the time of the procedure and reduces poststent activity more than a 75 mg dose given at the time of the procedure. The inhibition of adhesive molecule expression may also contribute an antithrombotic effect. Poststent activation of platelets may warrant higher periprocedural dosing. (Am Heart J 2003;145:239-47.)     

Increased risk in patients with high platelet aggregation receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: is the current antiplatelet therapy adequate?

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether patients receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy undergoing nonemergent stenting who display high on-treatment preprocedural platelet aggregation measured by standard light transmittance aggregometry and thrombelastography (TEG) will be at increased risk for poststenting ischemic events. BACKGROUND: Patients exhibiting heightened platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) might be at increased risk for recurrent ischemic events after coronary stenting. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients receiving chronic antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin (325 mg qd) and clopidogrel (75 mg qd) were studied before undergoing nonemergent stenting. Patients were followed for 1 year after coronary stenting for the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or ischemia requiring a hospital stay. RESULTS: All patients were aspirin responsive. Patients with ischemic events (23 of 100, 23%) within 1 year had greater on-treatment prestent ADP-induced platelet aggregation than patients without ischemic events by aggregometry and TEG (p < 0.001 for both measurements). Of patients with an ischemic event, 70% and 87% displayed high on-treatment platelet reactivity at baseline by aggregometry and TEG, respectively. High on-treatment platelet reactivity as measured by aggregometry and TEG were the only variables significantly related to ischemic events (p < 0.001 for both assays). The administration of eptifibatide reduced periprocedural elevation in platelet reactivity, with no significant differences in bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention who exhibit high on-treatment ADP-induced platelet aggregation are at increased risk for postprocedural ischemic events. These findings might have implications for the alteration in clopidogrel maintenance dose and use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in selected patients.     

阿托伐他汀或瑞舒伐他汀与氯吡格雷合用在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者支架置入术后的近期疗效比较

目的比较阿托伐他汀或瑞舒伐他汀与氯吡格雷合用在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)支架置入术后患者的近期疗效。方法共154例NSTE-ACS的患者接受支架置入术后,随机分为服用阿托伐他汀组(74例)及服用瑞舒伐他汀组(80例),术前服用阿司匹林(100mg)5 d、氯吡格雷(75 mg)5 d以上或术前12 h以上顿服氯吡格雷300 mg及阿司匹林片300 mg,于术前服抗血小板药前、手术当天、术后3、7 d及术后1、6个月抽取静脉血测定二磷酸腺苷(ADP)(浓度为10μmol/L)诱导的血小板聚集功能,观察住院期间及6个月的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。结果两组患者的临床基线资料及服药情况差异无统计学意义,服用氯吡格雷(75 mg)5 d或顿服300 mg能达到明显的血小板聚集率抑制作用,血小板聚集率在阿托伐他汀组由基线的(57.2±10.3)%降至手术当日的(32.5±11.2)%,而瑞舒伐他汀组分别为(59.1±9.8)%和(30.4±10.1)%(均为P<0.01),而且这种抑制作用稳定持续至6个月之后。6个月时两组间总的MACE发生率差异无统计学意义(13.0%比15.0%,P>0.05),两组心原性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、靶血管重建术、支架内血栓形成及出血事件差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。结论接受冠脉支架置入术的NSTE-ACS患者,服用阿托伐他汀或瑞舒伐他汀后,短期内未发现对氯吡格雷抗血小板作用产生显著影响,且两组间的近期疗效相近。     

Serial changes in platelet activation in patients with unstable angina following coronary stenting: evaluation of the effects of clopidogrel loading dose in inhibiting platelet activation.

BACKGROUND: Platelet activation is crucial in the development of acute or subacute stent thrombosis following implantation. This study investigated whether a conventional regimen comprising a loading dose of 300 mg of clopidogrel, followed by daily doses of 75 mg, could significantly suppress platelet activation in patients with unstable angina (UA) undergoing coronary stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Platelet activation (expressed by CD62p) was serially examined using flow cytometry in 42 consecutive patients with UA who underwent coronary stenting. CD62p expression was also evaluated in 30 normal control subjects. CD62p expression was markedly higher pre-procedure in the study patients than in the normal control subjects (5.2+/-4.0% vs 1.4+/-0.6%, p<0.0001). CD62p expression in the study patients remained significantly higher at 24 h after the procedure than in the control subjects (3.8+/-2.1% vs 1.4+/-0.6%, p<0.001). Additionally, only 26% of CD62p expression (5.2% vs 3.8%, p=0.026) in the study patients was suppressed at 24 h after the procedure. However, more than 60% of CD62p expression (5.2% vs 2.0%, p<0.0001) was suppressed on day 7 after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Less than one-third of CD62p expression was suppressed at 24 h by the conventional loading dose (300 mg) of clopidogrel in patients with UA following coronary stenting. This finding indicates the need to evaluate whether an increased loading dose of clopidogrel would be a more efficacious and safe regimen for patients in this clinical setting.