Spontaneous HIT syndrome post-knee replacement surgery with delayed recovery of thrombocytopenia: a case report and literature review

Recently published reports have established a heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)-mimicking thromboembolic disorder without proximate heparin exposure, called spontaneous HIT syndrome. Although the pathophysiology remains unclear, anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies possibly triggered by exposure to knee cartilage glycosaminoglycans or other non-heparin polyanions found on bacterial surfaces and nucleic acids have been postulated. We present a 53-year-old female receiving antithrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin following right total knee replacement surgery (without perioperative or any previous lifetime heparin exposure) who acutely presented with high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and right great saphenous vein thrombophlebitis on postoperative day (POD) 14; her platelet count at presentation was 13 × 10⁹/L. Prior to diagnostic consideration of spontaneous HIT syndrome, the patient briefly received unfractionated heparin (UFH) and one dose of enoxaparin. The patient’s serum tested strongly positive for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies by two different PF4-dependent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and by serotonin release assay (SRA). Failure of fondaparinux anticoagulation (persisting HIT-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation) prompted switching to argatroban. Severe thrombocytopenia persisted (platelet count nadir, 12 × 10⁹/L, on POD21), and 9 days after starting argatroban symptomatic right leg deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) occurred, prompting switch to rivaroxaban. Thereafter, her course was uneventful, although platelet count recovery was prolonged, reaching 99 × 10⁹/L by POD45 and 199 × 10⁹/L by POD79. The patient’s serum elicited strong serotonin release in the absence of heparin (seen even with 1/32 serum dilution) that was enhanced by pharmacological concentrations of UFH (0.1 and 0.3 IU/mL) and fondaparinux (0.1–1.2 μg/mL, i.e., in vitro fondaparinux “cross-reactivity”). Ultimately, platelet count recovery was associated with seroreversion to a negative SRA (documented at POD151). Our literature review identified joint replacement surgery, specifically knee replacement, to be a relatively common trigger of spontaneous HIT syndrome. Further, including our patient case, 5 of 7 patients with spontaneous HIT syndrome post-orthopedic surgery who received treatment with argatroban developed new and/or progressive lower-limb DVT or recurrent PE despite anticoagulation with this parenteral direct thrombin inhibitor, suggesting that this patient population is at high risk of breakthrough thrombotic events despite treatment with this HIT treatment-approved anticoagulant. Our case also illustrates successful outcome with rivaroxaban for treatment of spontaneous HIT syndrome, consistent with emerging literature supporting safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulant therapy for treatment of acute HIT.     

Limb ischemia due to spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia as the primary presentation of acute COVID-19 infection

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs with the development of IgG antibodies that bind complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4), which activate platelets and result in a profoundly prothrombotic condition. In rare instances, this syndrome develops in the absence of proximate heparin administration, referred to as spontaneous HIT, for which less than three dozen cases have been reported. Spontaneous HIT is considered a subtype of “autoimmune HIT” (aHIT), characterized by platelet activation in the serotonin release assay (SRA) without the addition of exogenous heparin. Here, we report spontaneous HIT as the presenting feature in a patient with 2019 coronavirus disease infection (COVID-19).

A 66-year-old male presented with progressive leg pain and was found to have a platelet count of 39?×?10⁹/L and multiple lower extremity arterial thromboses requiring fasciotomy and thrombectomy. He had no recent hospitalization, heparin exposure, vaccinations, or known thrombophilia. He had a strongly positive IgG-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for heparin-PF4 antibodies, and the SRA was strongly positive both with and without the addition of heparin. He was treated successfully with bivalirudin, intravenous immunoglobulin, and apixaban.

     

Frequency of anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies in hemodialysis patients and correlation with recurrent vascular access thrombosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), characterized by the formation of antibodies to a complex of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, is a well-recognized risk factor for thromboembolic complications. The frequency of antibody development varies among patient populations. Hemodialysis patients have repeated heparin exposure and should be at risk of developing HIT. This might, contribute to the development of vascular access thrombosis. We prospectively evaluated 88 hemodialysis patients for the presence of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Eighteen patients (20%) had a prior history of 1 or more prior access thrombosis. One patient (1.14%), without a history of graft thrombosis, tested positive for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. In our study, the presence of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies was rare and was not increased in patients with a history of vascular access thrombosis.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hemodialysis. Case report and review of the literature

Thrombocytopenia is a potential complication of heparin therapy. There are two forms of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Type-I HIT is characterized by a mild decrease in platelet count that occurs within the first 2-4 days after heparin initiation. The platelet count often returns to normal without stop heparin treatment. The mechanism of thrombocytopenia appears to be due to a direct effect of heparin on platelet activation. The second form (type-II) is an immune-mediated disorder characterized by severe thrombocytopenia, which may include both arterial and venous thrombosis. We present a case of type-II HIT occurred in a hemodialysis patient resulting in acute pulmonary embolism and peripheral venous thrombosis, and review the literature.     

The unique immunological features of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious drug reaction that leads to a decrease in platelet count and a high risk of thrombosis. HIT patients produce pathogenic immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies that bind to complexes of platelet factor‐4 (PF4) and heparin. HIT immune complexes crosslink Fc‐receptors resulting in platelet and monocyte activation. These events lead to the release of procoagulant chemokines and tissue factor, which together create an intensely prothrombotic state. HIT represents an atypical immune response because it has features of both T cell‐dependent and T cell‐independent mechanisms. The disorder is characterized by newly formed anti‐PF4/heparin IgG antibodies, which are characteristic of a T cell‐dependent mechanism; however, re‐exposure to heparin, months after HIT, does not lead to a memory response, which is consistent with a T cell‐independent mechanism. In this review, we discuss the immunobiological events that can explain these features, including the role for T cell‐dependent and T cell‐independent mechanisms in HIT antibody generation, the immunogenic characteristics of the PF4/heparin antigen, and the concept of a temporary loss in immune regulation contributing to the onset of HIT. We also present a novel immunobiological model to explain the atypical immune response that is characteristic of HIT.     

Risk factors for thrombosis in patients with immune mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND: As reported by major clinical series in the literature, about 2% of patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH) develop immune-mediated (type II) heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) that may be complicated in 30-75% of cases by a paradoxical thrombotic syndrome (HITTS), either arterial or venous. HITTS carries relevant rates of mortality and morbidity, amongst which cerebral and/or myocardial infarction and limb amputations. It is unclear as yet why some patients suffer from isolated thrombocytopenia (HIT), whilst others have HITTS. The aim of the present study was to look for clinical and laboratory features related to the occurrence of HITTS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the clinical records of 56 patients with proven HIT, as diagnosed on clinical grounds and by in vitro demonstration of immunoglobulin (IgG)/IgM against the PF4/heparin complex. Thirty-four patients (61%) had HITTS (19 venous thrombosis, seven arterial thrombosis, five arterial and venous thrombosis, two skin necrosis, one diffuse intravascular coagulation), whereas 22 had uncomplicated HIT. Amongst HITTS patients, two had limb amputation, five had recurrent thrombosis and seven died. Amongst HIT patients three died from causes unrelated to HIT. RESULTS: No significant difference in sex, age, previous exposure to heparin, UFH route of administration or dose, duration of therapy, time of onset of thrombocytopenia and platelet count recovery, nor antiheparin/PF4 antibodies subtype (IgG or IgM) was detected when comparing HIT and HITTS. In contrast, in the HITTS group a higher prevalence of orthopaedic surgery (15 of 34 vs. 2/22; P=0.01), a significantly lower platelet count nadir (43 +/- 32 vs. 75 +/- 63 x 109/L; P=0.01) and a significantly higher titre of antiheparin/PF4 antibodies, expressed as optical density of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); (1989 +/- 1024 vs. 1277 +/- 858; P=0.009), were observed in comparison with the HIT group. Amongst HITTS patients, the prevalence of venous thrombosis was significantly higher in orthopaedic patients and in those being treated for venous thromboembolism (18/24 vs. 1/9 patients, chi2 8.4, P=0.004), whilst arterial thrombosis (ART) occurred more often in heparin treatment for arterial disease (3/4 vs. 4/29 patients, chi2 4.6, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedic surgery, the severity of thrombocytopenia and high antiheparin/PF4 antibodies titre are adverse prognostic or concurrent factors in the development of HITTS.     

The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin: a prospective cohort study

Although heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a known complication of intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), its incidence in medical patients treated with subcutaneous UFH is less well defined. To determine the incidence of HIT in this category of patients, the platelet count was performed at baseline and then every 3 +/- 1 days in 598 consecutive patients admitted to 2 medical wards and treated with subcutaneous UFH for prophylactic (n = 360) or therapeutic (n = 238) indications. The diagnosis of HIT was accepted in the case of a platelet drop of 50% or more and either the demonstration of heparin-dependent antibodies or (when this search could not be performed) the combination of the following features: (1) the absence of any other obvious clinical explanation for thrombocytopenia, (2) the occurrence of thrombocytopenia at least 5 days after heparin start, and (3) either the normalization of the platelet count within 10 days after heparin discontinuation or the earlier patient's death due to an unexpected thromboembolic complication. HIT developed in 5 patients (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.1%-1.6%); all of them belonged to the subgroup of patients who received heparin for prophylactic indications. The prevalence of thromboembolic complications in patients with HIT (60%) was remarkably higher than that observed in the remaining 593 patients (3.5%), leading to an odds ratio of 40.8 (95% CI, 5.2-162.8). Although the frequency of HIT in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous heparin is lower than that observed in other clinical settings, this complication is associated with a similarly high rate of thromboembolic events.     

Decreased prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with low-molecular-weight heparin and related drugs

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) Type II represents a disease spectrum associated with a high risk of thrombosis leading to limb loss and death. The pathophysiology of HIT is based on the development of antibodies to the heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) complex. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is heterogeneous in molecular chain length and degree of sulfation accounting in part, for, the heterogeneity of HIT antibodies. Because of its smaller size, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) does not interact with PF4 and platelets as efficiently as does UFH. This translates into a lower risk of immune sensitization with LMWH than with UFH treatment. LMWH is less likely than UFH to cause antibody generation and thus patients do not develop clinical HIT at the same frequency with LMWH as with UFH treatment. The antibodies generated by LMWH treatment are more often immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgM as opposed to IgG antibodies, which are associated with symptomatic clinical HIT generated by exposure to UFH. However, platelet activation/aggregation can occur from LMWHs in the presence of most pre-existing HIT antibodies that had been generated from UFH exposure, although the response is less than that caused by UFH plus HIT antibody. With the expanded use of LMWH, the frequency of clinical HIT may naturally decline, given that LMWHs are less likely to generate HIT antibody.     

Rapid-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia without previous heparin exposure

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is one of the most common immune-mediated drug reactions. Immunoglobulin G-type antibodies against platelet factor 4(PF4)/heparin complexes are known to play a key role in the pathogenesis of HIT. Rapid-onset HIT is caused by the presence of circulating HIT antibodies at the time of heparin readministration. These antibodies are generally resulted from a recent immunizing exposure to heparin. Here we report a case of rapid-onset HIT developed after a septicemia without previous heparin exposure. The diagnosis of HIT as well as the presence of platelet activating and heparin-dependent antibodies was confirmed by ELISA and flow cytometric functional assays. Our case report reinforces that rapid-onset HIT cannot be excluded only based on the absence of previous heparin exposure. In addition, it may support the new theory of pre-immunization by PF4-coated bacteria in the pathomechanism of HIT. We also call the attention that venous limb gangrene can be rarely associated with HIT and thrombosis even in the absence of coumarin therapy. Furthermore, transient presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies can cause a differential diagnostic problem in the cases of HIT.     

Clinical challenge: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) or pseudo-HIT in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome

Treatment of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) and thrombosis in some cases that represents a clinical challenge, which, if unrecognized, may lead to treatment delay or disease progression with potentially lethal outcome. We present a case of a 19-year-old patient with antiphospholipid syndrome, factor V (FV) Leiden mutation in heterozygous state, and venous thromboembolism. The patient was subjected to intravenous infusions of unfractionated heparin (UFH), and 16 days after the beginning of the treatment, his condition worsened, with thrombocytopenia and extension of thrombosis. Whereas the patient had a high clinical score for HIT II, functional and antigenic assays for the presence of HIT antibodies were negative. After repeated negative functional and antigenic assays, pseudo-HIT was suspected and nadroparin was introduced, which resulted in further worsening of the clinical presentation. Disease remission, along with complete normalization of platelet count, was finally accomplished with the introduction of lepirudin. The presence of multiple comorbid states, such as antiphospholipid syndrome, can potentially make laboratory confirmation of disease more difficult in patients with HIT II. In our opinion, it is of great importance that HIT II diagnosis be primarily clinical and that laboratory test results are carefully interpreted, especially when HIT is indicated by high clinical score values.     

Rapid-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia without previous heparin exposure

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is one of the most common immune-mediated drug reactions. Immunoglobulin G-type antibodies against platelet factor 4(PF4)/heparin complexes are known to play a key role in the pathogenesis of HIT. Rapid-onset HIT is caused by the presence of circulating HIT antibodies at the time of heparin readministration. These antibodies are generally resulted from a recent immunizing exposure to heparin. Here we report a case of rapid-onset HIT developed after a septicemia without previous heparin exposure. The diagnosis of HIT as well as the presence of platelet activating and heparin-dependent antibodies was confirmed by ELISA and flow cytometric functional assays. Our case report reinforces that rapid-onset HIT cannot be excluded only based on the absence of previous heparin exposure. In addition, it may support the new theory of pre-immunization by PF4-coated bacteria in the pathomechanism of HIT. We also call the attention that venous limb gangrene can be rarely associated with HIT and thrombosis even in the absence of coumarin therapy. Furthermore, transient presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies can cause a differential diagnostic problem in the cases of HIT.     

The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in medical patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin: a prospective cohort study

In contrast with extensive documentation in patients treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH), the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in medical patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is less well defined. In a prospective cohort study, the platelet count was monitored in 1754 consecutive patients referred to 17 medical centers and treated with LMWH for prophylaxis or treatment of thromboembolic disorders. The diagnosis of HIT was accepted in case of a platelet drop of at least 50%, the absence of obvious explanations for thrombocytopenia, and the demonstration of heparin-dependent IgG antibodies. HIT developed in 14 patients (0.80%; 95% CI, 0.43%-1.34%), in all of them within the first 2 weeks, and was more frequent in patients who had (1.7%) than in those who had not (0.3%) been exposed to UFH or LMWH (OR = 4.9; 95% CI, 1.5-15.7). The prevalence of thromboembolic complications in HIT patients (4 of 14; 28.6%) was remarkably higher than that (41 of 1740; 2.4%) observed in the remaining patients (OR = 16.6; 95% CI, 5.0-55.0). Immune thrombocytopenia and related thromboembolism may complicate the clinical course of medical patients treated with LMWH with a frequency that is not different from that observed with the use of UFH. The previous administration of heparin increases the rate of HIT.     

Heparininduzierte Thrombozytopenie

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction that carries an increased risk of thromboembolic complications. HIT is caused by platelet-activating antibodies directed against a complex of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. HIT typically manifests in the second week after initiation of heparin therapy with a platelet count reduction of more than 50% of the highest level after the start of heparin administration as well as thromboembolic events. The clinical probability can be calculated by the 4 T’s score. The laboratory diagnosis of HIT is based on confirmation of PF4/heparin antibodies or on functional tests that provide evidence of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies. A low 4 T’s score and negative HIT test virtually rule out the presence of HIT. Patients with acute HIT require anticoagulation with a compatible anticoagulant in a therapeutic dose. The drugs currently available for this include the direct thrombin inhibitors argatroban, lepirudin, bivalirudin, and desirudin and the indirect factor Xa inhibitors danaparoid and fondaparinux.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a syndrome of antibody-mediated activation of platelets and coagulation that confers increased risk for thrombosis. This article reviews recent studies of the pathogenesis, laboratory testing, frequency, and clinical presentation of HIT. Topics discussed include the nature of the neoepitopes on platelet factor 4 recognized by HIT antibodies, the nonspecific nature of the polyanions that support neoepitope formation, activation of monocytes and endothelium, and the development of new animal models. The transient "autoimmune" nature of HIT is highlighted in relation to new data concerning the rapid decline in HIT antibodies, as well as the recent recognition of a syndrome of "delayed-onset HIT" in which thrombocytopenia and thrombosis begin several days after stopping heparin. Detecting only HIT antibodies of the immunoglobulin G class is suggested as one way to increase diagnostic specificity of laboratory testing. Recent reports suggest that HIT could explain approximately 5% of cases of acute adrenal failure caused by bilateral adrenal hemorrhagic infarction.     

Antibodies to platelet factor 4-heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients anticoagulated with unfractionated heparin or a low-molecular-weight heparin : clinical implications for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces platelet activation with release of platelet factor 4 (PF4), and patients are exposed to high doses of heparin (H). We investigated whether this contributes to the development of antibodies to H-PF4 and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). METHODS AND RESULTS: CPB was performed with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in 328 patients. After surgery, patients received UFH (calcium heparin, 200 IU. kg-1. d-1) (group 1, n=157) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH, Dalteparin, 5000 IU once daily) (group 2, n=171). Eight days after surgery, antibodies to H-PF4 were present in 83 patients (25.3%), 46 in group 1 and 37 in group 2 (P=0.12). Most patients (61%) had IgG1 to H-PF4, but only 8 samples with antibodies induced platelet activation with positive results on serotonin release assay. HIT occurred in 6 patients in group 1, but no thrombocytopenia was observed in subjects receiving LMWH, although 2 had high levels of antibodies with positive serotonin release assay results. When antibodies to H-PF4 were present, mean platelet counts were lower only in patients with FcgammaRIIA R/R131 platelets. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence that the development of antibodies to H-PF4 after CPB performed with UFH is not influenced by the postoperative heparin treatment. The antibodies associated with high risk of HIT are mainly IgG1, which is present at high titers in the plasma of patients continuously treated with UFH.     

The management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology has produced a concise practical guideline to highlight the key issues in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) for the practicing physician in the UK. The guideline is evidence-based and levels of evidence are included in the body of the article. All patients who are to receive heparin of any sort should have a platelet count on the day of starting treatment. For patients who have been exposed to heparin in the last 100 d, a baseline platelet count and a platelet count 24 h after starting heparin should be obtained. For all patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH), alternate day platelet counts should be performed from days 4 to 14. For surgical and medical patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) platelet counts should be performed every 2-4 d from days 4 to 14. Obstetric patients receiving treatment doses of LMWH should have platelet counts performed every 2-4 d from days 4 to 14. Obstetric patients receiving prophylactic LMWH are at low risk and do not need routine platelet monitoring. If the platelet count falls by 50% or more, or falls below the laboratory normal range and/or the patient develops new thrombosis or skin allergy between days 4 and 14 of heparin administration HIT should be considered and a clinical assessment made. If the pretest probability of HIT is high, heparin should be stopped and an alternative anticoagulant started at full dosage unless there are significant contraindications while laboratory tests are performed. Platelet activation assays using washed platelets have a higher sensitivity than platelet aggregation assays but are technically demanding and their use should be restricted to laboratories experienced in the technique. Non-expert laboratories should use an antigen-based assay of high sensitivity. Only IgG class antibodies need to be measured. Useful information is gained by reporting the actual optical density, inhibition by high concentrations of heparin, and the cut-off value for a positive test rather than simply reporting the test as positive or negative. In making a diagnosis of HIT the clinician's estimate of the pretest probability of HIT together with the type of assay used and its quantitative result (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA, only) should be used to determine the overall probability of HIT. Clinical decisions should be made following consideration of the risks and benefits of treatment with an alternative anticoagulant. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT, heparin should be stopped and full-dose anticoagulation with an alternative, such as lepirudin or danaparoid, commenced (in the absence of a significant contraindication). Warfarin should not be used until the platelet count has recovered. When introduced in combination with warfarin, an alternative anticoagulant must be continued until the International Normalised Ratio (INR) is therapeutic for two consecutive days. Platelets should not be given for prophylaxis. Lepirudin, at doses adjusted to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) ratio of 1.5-2.5, reduces the risk of reaching the composite endpoint of limb amputation, death or new thrombosis in patients with HIT and HIT with thrombosis (HITT). The risk of major haemorrhage is directly related to the APTT ratio, lepirudin levels and serum creatinine levels. The patient's renal function needs to be taken into careful consideration before treatment with lepirudin is commenced. Severe anaphylaxis occurs rarely in recipients of lepirudin and is more common in previously exposed patients. Danaparoid in a high-dose regimen is equivalent to lepirudin in the treatment of HIT and HITT. Danaparoid at prophylactic doses is not recommended for the treatment of HIT or HITT. Patients with previous HIT who are antibody negative (usually so after >100 d) who require cardiac surgery should receive intraoperative UFH in preference to other anticoagulants that are less validated for this purpose. Pre- and postoperative anticoagulation should be with an anticoagulant other than UFH or LMWH. Patients with recent or active HIT should have the need for surgery reviewed and delayed until the patient is antibody negative if possible. They should then proceed as above. If deemed appropriate early surgery should be carried out with an alternative anticoagulant. We recommend discussion of these complex cases requiring surgery with an experienced centre. The diagnosis must be clearly recorded in the patient's medical record.     

Prevalence of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies and the HIT syndrome in cardiovascular medicine

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially life-threatening adverse effect of heparin treatment. HIT is mediated by antibodies directed at complexes that form between heparin and platelet factor 4 in plasma and are located on the platelet surface and on endothelium. HIT occurs in 1 to 2% of patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH) and with lower frequency in patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparins and heparinoids. Despite recent insights into the mechanisms of HIT, there remain important unresolved issues. For example, the reason for the wide difference in the frequency of HIT in patients treated with UFH in various clinical trials is not yet clear. There are patient population-dependent differences in the risk for HIT immunoglobulin G and the development of thrombotic episodes. The complex nature of this syndrome may relate to the composition of the responsible antigen. Patients with HIT need a more accurate evaluation of platelet counts and a better assessment of clinical evidence for thrombosis. Alternative anticoagulant therapy approaches are being studied, but there is at this time no firm clinical evidence for which treatment is best for patients with HIT and HIT-related thromboses.     

Treatment of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a novel prothrombotic disorder characterized by thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and disseminated intravascular coagulation identified in hundreds of recipients of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford/AstraZeneca), an adenovirus vector coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. VITT resembles heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in that patients have platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies; however, whereas heparin typically enhances platelet activation by HIT antibodies, VITT antibody-induced platelet activation is often inhibited in vitro by pharmacological concentrations of heparin. Further, the thrombotic complications in VITT feature much higher frequencies of atypical thrombosis, most notably cerebral vein thrombosis and splanchnic vein thrombosis, compared with HIT. In this review, we outline the treatments that have been used to manage this novel condition since its recognition in March 2021, including anticoagulation, high-dose intravenous immune globulin, therapeutic plasma exchange, corticosteroids, rituximab, and eculizumab. We discuss the controversial issue of whether heparin, which often inhibits VITT antibody-induced platelet activation, is harmful in the treatment of VITT. We also describe a case of “long VITT,” describing the treatment challenges resulting from platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies that persisted for more than 9 months.     

The use of direct thrombin inhibitors in cardiovascular surgery in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

One of the most important adverse drug reactions that physicians encounter is the life- and limb-threatening prothrombotic syndrome known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Unfractionated heparin (UFH), administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), is highly immunogenic. Heparin-dependent antibodies can develop in 25 to 50% of UFH-treated cardiac surgery patients within 5 to 10 days. These antibodies can activate platelets and are considered the causative agents of HIT. HIT is a relatively common complication, occurring in 1 to 3% of cardiovascular surgery patients when UFH administration is continued postoperatively. It is strongly associated with new thromboembolic events leading to limb amputation and death. In acute or recent (< 100 days) HIT, alternative anticoagulatory regimens are needed during CPB surgery for prevention of HIT-related thrombosis. Treatment options for such patients now generally include the use of alternative anticoagulants such as lepirudin, bivalirudin, or danaparoid, as well as a combined treatment with platelet-function inhibitors and heparin. In patients with a history of HIT and no detectable antibodies, heparin is currently the safest approach for high-dose anticoagulation during CPB. Before and after surgery, however, alternative anticoagulants should be used. The risk of clinical HIT after heart surgery could potentially be reduced by using low-molecular-weight heparins for postsurgery anticoagulation.     

Management of anticoagulation in patients with subacute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia scheduled for heart transplantation

Anticoagulation management of patients with recent heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery is a serious challenge, and especially difficult in patients requiring urgent heart transplantation. As nonheparin anticoagulants during CPB bear a high risk of major bleeding, these patients are at risk of being taken off the transplant list. Short-term use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) for CPB, with restriction of UFH to the surgery itself, is safe and effective in patients with a history of HIT who test negative for antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies. We present evidence that it is safe to expand the concept of UFH reexposure to patients with subacute HIT (ie, those patients with recent HIT in whom the platelet count has recovered but in whom anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibodies remain detectable) requiring heart transplantation, if they test negative by a sensitive functional assay using washed platelets. This can be lifesaving in patients with end-stage heart failure.