Platelet factor XIIIa release during platelet aggregation and plasma clot strength measured by thrombelastography in patients with coronary artery disease treated with clopidogrel

Abstract

It has been estimated that up to half of circulating factor XIIIa (FXIIIa) is stored in platelets. The release of FXIIIa from platelets upon stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in patients with coronary artery disease treated with dual antiplatelet therapy has not been previously examined. Samples from 96 patients with established coronary artery disease treated with aspirin and clopidogrel were examined. Platelet aggregation was performed by light transmittance aggregometry in platelet-rich plasma (PRP), with platelet-poor plasma (PPP) as reference, and ADP 5?µM as agonist. Kaolin-activated thrombelastography (TEG) was performed in citrate PPP. PRP after aggregation was centrifuged and plasma supernatant (PSN) collected. FXIIIa was measured in PPP and PSN. Platelet aggregation after stimulation with ADP 5?µM resulted in 24% additional FXIIIa release in PSN as compared to PPP (99.3?±?27 vs. 80.3?±?24%, p?<?0.0001). FXIIIa concentration in PSN correlated with maximal plasma clot strength (TEG-G) (r?=?0.48, p?<?0.0001), but not in PPP (r?=?0.15, p?=?0.14). Increasing quartiles of platelet-derived FXIIIa were associated with incrementally higher TEG-G (p?=?0.012). FXIIIa release was similar between clopidogrel responders and non-responders (p?=?0.18). In summary, platelets treated with aspirin and clopidogrel release a significant amount of FXIIIa upon aggregation by ADP. Platelet-derived FXIIIa may contribute to differences in plasma TEG-G, and thus, in part, provide a mechanistic explanation for high clot strength observed as a consequence of platelet activation. Variability in clopidogrel response does not significantly influence FXIIIa release from platelets.     

Comparison of aspirin and indobufen in healthy volunteers

The aim of this study is to quantify the extent and recovery of platelet inhibition after administration of indobufen and aspirin in healthy volunteers. Indobufen inhibits platelet aggregation by reversibly inhibiting the platelet cyclooxygenase enzyme, thereby suppressing thromboxane synthesis. Twenty healthy volunteers completed the study and received aspirin (200?mg/day for 2 weeks) followed by a 4-week washout period and then indobufen (200?mg twice a day for 2 weeks). The percent (%) inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) was assessed using arachidonic acid (0.5?mg/ml) and adenosine diphosphate (5?µM) at 4, 12, 24 and 48 hours after last dose of each drug. IPA assessed using arachidonic acid as the agonist was similar at 4 hours after the last dose of indobufen (81.07?±?9.36%) and aspirin (96.99?±?0.29%, p?=?0.10), but significantly lower at 12 hours (74.04?±?9.55% vs. 97.94?±?0.28%, p?=?0.02), 24 hours (33.39?±?11.13% vs. 97.48?±?0.32%, p?p?p?=?0.002). Indobufen (200?mg twice a day) caused equivalent initial inhibition of platelet aggregation to aspirin (200?mg daily), and the anti-aggregation effect diminished faster than after aspirin.     

Individual long-term variation of platelet reactivity in patients with dual antiplatelet therapy after myocardial infarction

There is a large inter-individual variation in response to clopidogrel treatment, and previous studies have indicated higher risk of thrombotic events in those with high residual platelet reactivity (HPR). Less is known about individual variation over time. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to investigate intra-individual variation in platelet reactivity. Platelet aggregation in whole blood was assessed in 77 patients, at 3 days, 8 days and 6 months after admission for acute myocardial infarction and loading dose of clopidogrel. All patients were treated with aspirin and clopidogrel through 6-month follow-up. We found a significant increase in median ADP-stimulated aggregation from third to eighth day (195 vs. 250 AU*min, p-value = 0.001) but not from day 8 to 6 months (250 vs. 223 AU*min, p-value = 0.666). There was no significant change in the overall rate of HPR (15.6% vs 20.8%, p-value 0.503) or low platelet reactivity (LPR) (37.7% vs 33.8%, p-value = 0.609) from day 8 to 6-month follow-up. In contrast, more than one in four changed HPR status, 15.6% from non-HPR to HPR and 10.4% HPR to non-HPR. A shift in LPR status appeared even more frequent, occurring in about one of three patients. In spite of similar median aggregation and rate of HPR during 6-month follow-up, about one in four of the patients changed HPR status and one in three changed LPR status. This may be important information for a concept of risk stratification based on a single aggregation value early after an acute coronary syndromes.     

Impaired responsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with recurrent stent thrombosis following percutaneous intervention for peripheral artery disease

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) following peripheral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with stent implantation are prone to stent thrombosis despite treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. Impaired clopidogrel responsiveness is associated with increased risk of ischemic events in patients following coronary stent implantation. We sought to assess platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with PAD and recurrent stent thrombosis. Platelet aggregation induced by 5 and 20?µmol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and 0.5?mmol/l arachidonic acid (AA), together with platelet reactivity index (PRI) and serum thromboxane B₂ (TXB₂), were determined in 11 patients with PAD and a history of stent thrombosis (mean, 3.1?±?1.14) after PTA and in 15 patients with PAD with no such history, also in 11 controls with coronary artery disease (CAD) and previous stent thrombosis. Platelet aggregation to 5?µmol/l ADP was higher in subjects with PAD and stent thrombosis than in those without stent thrombosis (p?=?0.0003) and CAD subjects (p?=?0.002). Aggregation induced by 20?µmol/l ADP was higher in PAD group with stent thrombosis than in PAD subjects without thrombosis (p?=?0.004). The PAD group with stent thrombosis had higher AA-induced platelet aggregation than CAD controls (p?=?0.007) and serum TXB₂ concentrations higher than PAD group without thrombosis (p?=?0.002) and CAD group (p?=?0.02). Concluding, platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin is impaired in patients with PAD and recurrent stent thrombosis following PTA, as compared with similar individuals with CAD, and PAD with no history of stent thrombosis. This indicates that atherosclerosis burden affects platelet function and might contribute to stent thrombosis following percutaneous intervention in peripheral arteries.     

Platelet function measured by VerifyNow™ identifies generalized high platelet reactivity in aspirin treated patients

Selected aspirin treated patients may exhibit high platelet reactivity to agonists other than arachidonic acid. This study aimed to determine whether the VerifyNow? identifies generalized high platelet reactivity supported by correlations with other established methods that stimulate platelets with various agonists. Stable outpatients with coronary artery disease (n?=?110) were treated with aspirin in a two 3?×?3 Latin square design (81, 162 and 325?mg/day for 4 weeks each). VerifyNow? (arachidonic acid (AA) cartridge); light transmittance aggregometry; thrombelastography; PFA-100®; flow cytometry; PlateletWorks®; and urinary 11- dehydro thromboxane levels were measured. Multianalyte profiling measured fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor (vWF). Patients with ≥550 ARU by VerifyNow? had increased 5?mM AA-, 5?µM ADP-, and 2?µg/mL collagen-induced platelet aggregation compared to patients with <550 ARU (p?≤?0.001). The highest ADP- and collagen-induced aggregation was present in the upper quartile by VerifyNow? (p?<?0.05). Fibrinogen or vWF levels did not differ between VerifyNow? quartiles. Patients with high platelet reactivity to arachidonic acid identified by VerifyNow? also exhibit increased reactivity to other important platelet agonists that is independent of fibrinogen and vWF levels. These data suggest that VerifyNow? may identify a generalized high platelet reactivity phenotype.     

Association of plasma miR-223 and platelet reactivity in patients with coronary artery disease on dual antiplatelet therapy: A preliminary report

Decreased plasma levels of microRNA-223 (miR-223), predominantly of platelet origin, were proposed as a surrogate marker of efficacy of antiplatelet therapy. However, higher on-treatment platelet reactivity was associated with lower plasma miR-223 in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) including clopidogrel and aspirin. Our aim was to compare plasma miR-223 and platelet reactivity in CAD patients on DAPT with newer P2Y₁₂ antagonists vs. clopidogrel. We studied 21 men with CAD admitted to our centre owing to a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, and with an uncomplicated hospital course. From the day of admission, the patients were receiving either clopidogrel (n?=?11) or prasugrel/ticagrelor (n?=?10) in addition to aspirin. Before discharge, miR-223 expression in plasma was estimated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using the comparative Ct method relative to miR-16 as an endogenous control. Multiple electrode aggregometry was used to assess platelet aggregation in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP). ADP-induced platelet reactivity was decreased in the patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor compared with those on clopidogrel (mean?±?SD: 139?±?71 vs. 313?±?162 arbitrary units [AU]*min, p?=?0.006), due to a more potent antiplatelet activity of the novel P2Y₁₂ antagonists. Consequently, six out of seven patients in the lower tertile of the ADP-induced platelet aggregation were treated with the newer P2Y₁₂ blockers, whereas six out of seven patients in the upper tertile were on clopidogrel. Plasma miR-223 was elevated with decreasing platelet reactivity (Spearman’s rho?=?–0.52; p?=?0.015 for trend), being significantly higher in the lower tertile of the ADP-induced platelet aggregation (median [range]: 1.06 [0.25–2.31]) vs. the upper tertile (0.20 [0.13–2.30]) (p?=?0.04). In conclusion, our preliminary results argue against the notion of low plasma miR-223 as a marker of platelet responsiveness to DAPT. On the contrary, more potent platelet inhibition associated mainly with newer P2Y₁₂ antagonists appears to coincide with higher miR-223 relative to the subjects with attenuated responsiveness to DAPT.     

Brachial artery endothelial function predicts platelet function in control subjects and in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Platelet activation occurs in an endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD) impairment environment. The aim of this study was to explore the association between platelet reactivity and brachial artery FMD in individuals without established cardiovascular disease (controls) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. We prospectively assessed brachial artery FMD in 151 consecutive subjects, 104 (69%) controls, and 47 (31%) AMI patients; 115 (76%) men, mean age 53?±?11 years. Following overnight fasting and discontinuation of all medications for?≥?12?h, percent change in brachial artery FMD (%FMD) and endothelium-independent, nitroglycerin-mediated vasodilation (%NTG) were assessed. Platelet aggregation was assessed by conventional aggregometry, and platelet adhesion and aggregation under flow conditions by cone-and-plate(let) technology (Impact-R). Smoking, diabetes, and hypertension were more common in AMI compared to control subjects (p?<?0.01 for all). Furthermore, aspirin, clopidogrel, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and statin administration were more common in AMI compared to controls (p?<?0.01 for all). %FMD but not %NTG was significantly lower in AMI patients compared to controls (10.2?±?4.2% vs. 15.4?±?4.4%; p?<?0.001 and 17.2?±?3.9% vs. 18.0?±?3.7%, p?=?0.803, respectively). %FMD was significantly and inversely associated with all platelet functions tests (p?<?0.001) in all study participants. In a multivariate logistic regression (unadjusted and adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, overweight, family history, and concomitant medications), %FMD remained the best predictor of platelet function, irrespective of group allocation (AMI patients or controls). In conclusion, FMD is inversely correlated to platelet reactivity in both controls and AMI patients.     

Comparison between a new platelet count drop method PL-11, light transmission aggregometry,VerifyNow aspirin system and thromboelastography for monitoring short-term aspirin effects in healthy individuals

Platelet function has been described by many laboratory assays, and PL-11 is a new point-of-care platelet function analyzer based on platelet count drop method, which counts platelet before and after the addition of agonists in the citrated whole blood samples. The present study sought to compare PL-11 with other three major more established assays, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow? aspirin system and thromboelastography (TEG), for monitoring the short-term aspirin responses in healthy individuals. Ten healthy young men took 100?mg/d aspirin for 3-day treatment. Platelet function was measured via PL-11, LTA, VerifyNow and TEG, respectively. The blood samples were collected at baseline, 2 hour, 1 day during the aspirin treatment and 1 day, 5?±?1 days, 8?±?1 days after the aspirin withdrawal. Moreover, 90 additional healthy subjects were recruited to establish a reference range for PL-11. Platelet function of healthy subjects decreased significantly 2 hours after 100?mg/d aspirin intake and began to recover during 4–6 days after the aspirin withdrawal. Correlations between methods were PL-11 vs. LTA (r?=?0.614, p?<?0.01); PL-11 vs. VerifyNow (r?=?0.829, p?<?0.01); PL-11 vs. TEG (r?=?0.697, p?<?0.001). There was no significant bias between PL-11 and LTA at baseline (bias?=?1.94%, p?=?0.804) using Bland-Altman analysis, while the data of PL-11 were significantly higher than LTA (bias?=?24.02%, p?<?0.001) during the aspirin therapy. The reference range for PL-11 in healthy young individuals was from 66.8 to 90.5% (95%CI). When aspirin low-responsiveness was defined as LTA?>?20%, the cut-off values for each method were, respectively: PL-11?>?50%, VerifyNow?>?533 ARU, TEG?>?60.2%. The results of different platelet function assays were uninterchangeable for monitoring aspirin response and correlations among them were also varied. Correlations among PL-11 and other three major assays suggested the ability of PL-11 to assess the treatment effects of aspirin. But a large cohort study is needed to confirm the cut-off value of aspirin response detected by PL-11.     

Aspirin-induced platelet inhibition in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Platelet function and response to pharmacological inhibition are altered by cardiac surgery. For example, aggregation is increased early after aortic valve replacement (AVR) and platelet response to aspirin is often insufficient after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We hypothesized that the effect of aspirin administration after cardiac surgery might be impaired due to platelet activation. Therefore, the antiplatelet effect of aspirin was compared in patients (n?=?20 per group) after CABG and AVR surgery (bileaflet prosthesis). Arachidonic acid-induced aggregation (turbidimetry) and thromboxane formation (radioimmunoassay) were determined before and 1, 5, and 10 days after surgery. In CABG-patients, antiplatelet treatment had been discontinued 10 days before surgery. Oral aspirin was started on day 1 after CABG. AVR-patients did not receive oral aspirin. Before surgery, platelet aggregation and thromboxane formation were significantly higher in patients with aortic stenosis. After CABG, thromboxane formation was not significantly changed from control values before surgery (66?±?13% on day 10) despite oral aspirin treatment, whereas thromboxane formation in patients undergoing AVR significantly increased compared to values before surgery (216?±?29% on day 10). In both groups of patients, 100?µmol/l aspirin in vitro largely inhibited platelet function before surgery, with markedly attenuated effects after surgery. In conclusion, thromboxane formation increased after AVR but not after CABG. The antiplatelet effect of aspirin, therefore, may be impaired after CABG by increased platelet activity. An additional in vitro “resistance” of platelets was seen after both CABG and AVR.     

Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on platelet aggregation and platelet turnover

Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) is a new beneficial treatment for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RIC may inhibit thrombus formation and, therefore, we investigated whether RIC affects platelet aggregation and turnover. 30 healthy male volunteers were subjected to intervention on day 1 (sham intervention, no aspirin), day 2 (RIC, no aspirin), and day 16 (RIC, treated 7 days with aspirin 75 mg/day). RIC was performed as four cycles of 5 min interchangeable inflation and deflation using an automated cuff. Blood samples were collected 5 min before, as well as 5 and 45 min after RIC. Platelet aggregation was measured by Multiplate® using collagen (COLtest), adenosine diphosphate (ADPtest), and arachidonic acid (ASPItest) as agonists. Platelet turnover was evaluated by flow cytometry. Serum thromboxane B₂ was determined by ELISA to confirm aspirin compliance. We found no significant change in platelet aggregation at visit 1 (COLtest: p?=?0.32; ADPtest: p?=?0.24; ASPItest: p?=?0.07), visit 2, except for ADP-induced platelet aggregation evaluated 5 min after RIC (COLtest: p?=?0.39; ADPtest: p?=?0.02; ASPItest: p?=?0.39), or visit 3 (COLtest: p?=?0.48; ADPtest: p?=?0.61; ASPItest: p?=?0.90). Platelet turnover was not influenced by RIC, neither on nor off aspirin (all p-values?>?0.07). (1) RIC did not affect platelet aggregation in healthy young men. (2) RIC did not affect platelet turnover in healthy young men. (3) Aspirin did not influence the effect of RIC on platelet aggregation and turnover. (4) Future studies exploring the effect of RIC on platelet aggregation and turnover in patients with ischaemic heart disease are warranted.     

Once- versus twice-daily aspirin treatment in patients with essential thrombocytosis

Insufficient platelet inhibition has been reported in up to 40% of aspirin-treated patients, including patients with essential thrombocytosis. To maintain sufficient platelet inhibition, a shorter dosing interval with aspirin has been suggested. We aimed to investigate the antiplatelet effect of low-dose aspirin given twice-daily compared to standard once-daily dosing in patients with essential thrombocytosis. We included 22 patients, who were treated for 7 days with standard once-daily aspirin (75 mg once-daily) followed by 7 days treatment of twice-daily aspirin (37.5 mg twice-daily). The two regimens were separated by 14 days aspirin washout. Blood samples were obtained 1h and 24h/12h after the last pill intake in each regimen. The effect of aspirin was evaluated by: (1) platelet aggregation measured by whole blood impedance aggregometry (Multiplate® Analyser) using arachidonic acid (ASPItest 0.5 mM) as agonist and (2) serum thromboxane B₂ levels determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The difference in platelet aggregation from 1h to the end of the dosing interval (24h/12h) was used to compare the two regimens. We demonstrated a significantly smaller difference in platelet aggregation in the twice-daily regimen compared to the once-daily: mean of difference = 228 AU*min (95% confidence interval (CI): 92–363, p < 0.01). In addition, a significantly smaller difference in thromboxane B₂ was demonstrated in the twice-daily regimen compared to the once-daily regimen: mean of difference = 16.3 ng/mL (95% CI: 9.9–22.7, p < 0.01). In conclusion, twice-daily dosing with low-dose aspirin provides a more consistent platelet inhibition compared with standard once-daily dosing in patients with essential thrombocytosis.     

Comparison of increased aspirin dose versus combined aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease and impaired antiplatelet response to low-dose aspirin

The effects of therapy with aspirin 300 mg/day and with combined aspirin 100 mg/day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/day on platelet function were compared in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease and impaired antiplatelet responses to aspirin 100 mg/day. The study population consisted of 151 outpatients with type II diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease who were taking aspirin 100 mg/day. Of the 151 patients, a subgroup of subjects with impaired aspirin response were selected on the basis of the results of platelet aggregometry. Nonresponsiveness to aspirin was defined as mean aggregation > or =69% with 3 micromol/L adenosine diphosphate and mean aggregation > or =70% with 2 micromol/L collagen. Aspirin semiresponders were defined as meeting 1 but not both of these criteria. Nonresponders and semiresponders were randomized equally to aspirin 300 mg/day and aspirin 100 mg/day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/day, and aggregation tests were repeated after 2 weeks. Sixty of the 151 patients with diabetes (40%) were found to respond to aspirin inadequately. Platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate and collagen decreased significantly after aspirin 300 mg/day or combined therapy. Combined treatment was found to have a stronger inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate than aspirin 300 mg/day (p = 0.002). Impaired aspirin response was resolved by increasing the aspirin dose or adding clopidogrel to aspirin (p <0.0001 for each). However, desired platelet inhibition was achieved in significantly more patients by combined treatment than by aspirin 300 mg/day (p <0.05). In conclusion, aspirin 100 mg/day does not inhibit platelet function adequately in a significant number of patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. Increasing the aspirin dose to 300 mg/day or adding clopidogrel to aspirin can provide adequate platelet inhibition in a significant number of those patients with impaired responses to low-dose aspirin.     

Clopidogrel anti-platelet effect: An evaluation by optical aggregometry,impedance aggregometry,and the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100™)

Platelet aggregation inhibition by clopidogrel may be suboptimal in 4–30% of patients. Traditionally, optical aggregometry is used to assess clopidogrel's anti-platelet effects by inhibition of ADP-induced aggregation in platelet rich plasma. Red blood cells are an important source of ADP and, thus, are known to modulate platelet function. Because the whole blood aggregation by impedance method assesses platelet function in a physiological milieu, we compared clopidogrel response by this method with the optical method in platelet rich plasma (PRP) and the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100?). Platelet function studies were performed in 17 healthy subjects at baseline and after 10 days of clopidogrel intake (75?mg/day). Optical and impedance aggregometry were performed after addition of ADP (10 and 20?µM) and collagen (1 and 2?µg/mL). For PFA-100? analysis, whole blood closure time was measured in collagen-coated cartridges with ADP and epinephrine. All subjects except one showed a decrease in ADP-induced aggregation using both aggregation methods. However, ADP-induced platelet aggregation was significantly inhibited when assessed in whole blood as compared to the optical method (71?±?34% vs. 34.2?±?23%, p?=?0.0002); this suggests that whole blood aggregometry is more sensitive in the detection of clopidogrel effect in the presence of red cells, which are known to modulate platelet function. The PFA-100? ADP closure time was slightly prolonged above the reference interval in only 5/17 (29%) subjects, suggesting that this instrument is not able to detect clopidogrel effect. We conclude that whole blood aggregation appears to be more sensitive in detecting clopidogrel effect compared with the platelet rich plasma method; the PFA-100? was unable to detect clopidogrel effect in the majority of the subjects.     

Evening intake of aspirin is associated with a more stable 24-h platelet inhibition compared to morning intake: a study in chronic aspirin users

Daily generation of novel platelets may compromise aspirin’s platelet inhibitory action, especially near the end of the regular 24-h dosing interval. A contributor to this attenuation could be the endogenous circadian rhythm.

The primary objective of this study was to assess platelet activity 12 and 24 h after different times of aspirin intake (c.q. 8.00 AM and 8.00 PM). A randomized open-label crossover study was conducted, comprising outpatients with stable cardiovascular disease taking aspirin once daily. We measured platelet aggregation with the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-200^® and light transmission aggregometry (LTA). The attenuation of aspirin’s inhibitory action was most apparent in the 8.00 AM regimen. The platelet function analyzer—closure time was 78 s faster at 24 h than at 12 h after intake in the 8.00 AM regimen (IQR: 166.8–301 vs. 132.8–301; p = 0.006) and 0 s faster at 24 h than at 12 h after intake in the 8.00 PM regimen (IQR: 198.8–837.0 vs. 169.8–301; p = 0.653). The adenosine diphosphate 1.0 µmol/L maximum amplitude was 5.40% higher at 24 h than at 12 h after intake in the 8.00 AM regimen (95% confidence interval (CI): ?0.03–?10.8; p = 0.040) and was 0.75% higher 24 h than at 12 h after intake in the 8.00 PM regimen (95% CI: ?4.83–3.33; p = 0.705). The platelet inhibitory effect of aspirin decreases after 24 h, particularly after intake in the morning. These results suggest that patients might benefit from evening intake or twice daily intake regimens.     

Perioperative point of care platelet function testing and postoperative blood loss in high-risk cardiac surgery patients

Postoperative coagulopathic bleeding is common in cardiac surgery and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Platelet function is affected by multiple factors, including patient and procedural characteristics. Point-of-care (POC) multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) can rapidly detect and quantify platelet dysfunction and could contribute to optimal patient blood management.

In patients undergoing CABG and heart valve surgery platelet function was assessed using POC MEA at four different perioperative timepoints in response to stimulation with four specific receptor agonists (ADP, AA, COL, TRAP). Postoperative bleeding was recorded during 24 h after surgery. Regression analyses were performed to establish associations between perioperative platelet function and postoperative blood loss.

Ninety-nine patients were included in the study. Fifty-nine patients (60%) were on antiplatelet therapy (APT) at time of surgery. ADP- and AA-induced platelet aggregation declined during CPB and after decannulation from CPB, with a maximum decrease of 55% for ADP (35 vs. 77 AU at baseline; P < 0.001) and 78% for ASPI (14 vs. 64 AU at baseline; P < 0.001). A linear relationship was present between ADP-induced platelet aggregometry at baseline and postoperative blood loss (r = ?0.249; P = 0.015). In aspirin users, the maximum decline in platelet function between baseline and CPB decannulation was related to postoperative blood loss (r = 0.308; P = 0.037). In multivariate analysis, a reduced ADP platelet function prior to surgery remained associated with postoperative blood loss (r = ?0.239; P = 0.012).

Reduced ADP-induced platelet aggregation at baseline is associated with increased postoperative blood loss in high-risk cardiac surgery patients.     

Atrial fibrillation is associated with increased mean platelet volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Platelet abnormalities in diabetes mellitus (DM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) may underline the etiology of a prothrombotic state in these conditions. Increased mean platelet volume (MPV) is a marker of abnormal platelet function and activation. We aimed to investigate the possible association of chronic AF with MPV in patients who have type 2 DM. Patients who had type 2 DM with either chronic (≥6 months) AF or normal sinus rhythm (NSR) were included in the study. A total of 162 patients (aged 38–89 years) were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of either AF or NSR. Group 1 consisted of 81 diabetic patients with AF, and group 2 consisted of 81 diabetic patients with NSR. The two groups were not significantly different in terms of age, and gender, as well as in hypertension, smoking, history of coronary artery disease, previous cerebrovascular accidents, microalbuminuria, retinopathy, duration of DM, body mass index, hemoglobin A_1c, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride (p?>?0.05 for all variables). Although no significant difference was present between groups concerning platelet count; for patients with AF, MPV was higher compared with patients with NSR (9.0?±?0.2?fl vs. 8.4?±?0.2?fl; p?=?0.001). Furthermore, no significant difference was noted between groups regarding routine medications received by patients. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, MPV was the only variable independently related to AF (OR?=?2.659; 95% CI, 1.286–5.498; p?=?0.008). Consequently, it is concluded that AF is associated with increased MPV in patients with type 2 DM, suggesting the presence of tentatively related processes leading to reciprocal interaction.     

The effect of aspirin on mean platelet volume in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Aspirin is one of the preferred therapies in the primary prevention of ischemic stroke in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Mean platelet volume (MPV) is a marker of platelet size and activation. Increased MPV reflects active and large platelets. The present observational study was designed to investigate whether aspirin treatment does affect MPV levels in patients with PAF. The study included 101 patients who were detected to have PAF by 24-hour Holter monitoring and divided into two groups based on aspirin treatment [ASA (+) and ASA (?)]. MPV was measured. Patients with aortic and mitral stenosis, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, malignancy, infection, and pregnancy were excluded from the study. Of the 101 patients, 50 had no antiplatelet therapy and 51 had daily aspirin (100?mg) intake. Mean age of the patients was 66?±?10 years and 35 (68%) were male in ASA (+) group. There was no difference in median levels of MPV (9.9 vs. 10.2?fl, respectively; p?=?0.9) between groups. Both uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses did not show an association between MPV and ASA use. Our results indicate that MPV as a predictive marker of platelet size and activity is not affected by aspirin use in patients with PAF.     

24-hour antiplatelet effect of aspirin in patients with previous definite stent thrombosis

Objective

Once-daily aspirin is standard treatment, but recent studies point towards increased platelet function at the end of the dosing interval. Stent thrombosis (ST) has been linked with reduced antiplatelet effect of aspirin, so we investigated if platelet inhibition by aspirin declines through 24 h in patients with previous definite ST. Furthermore, we explored whether increased levels of immature platelets and thrombopoietin are associated with a particularly rapid recovery of platelet function.

Methods

This case–control study included 50 patients with previous definite ST matched with 100 patients with stable coronary artery disease and 50 healthy volunteers. All participants were on aspirin 75 mg/day mono antiplatelet therapy. Platelet aggregation was measured 1 and 24 h after aspirin intake using platelet aggregometry (Multiplate^® Analyzer). Cyclooxygenase-1 activity, platelet activation, immature platelets, and thrombopoietin were measured.

Results

Platelet aggregation increased by 109 ± 150 (arachidonic acid) and 47 ± 155 (collagen) aggregation units per minute from 1 to 24 h after aspirin intake (p-values < 0.0001) with corresponding increases in thromboxane B₂ (5.6 ± 5.1 ng/ml, p < 0.0001) and soluble P-selectin (6.2 ± 15.5 ng/ml, p < 0.0001). Platelet aggregation increased equally in all groups, but patients with previous ST displayed the highest levels of platelet aggregation at 24 h (p-values ≤ 0.05) and the highest levels of immature platelets (p < 0.01) and thrombopoietin (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Platelet inhibition declined significantly during the 24-hour dosing interval in aspirin-treated patients with previous definite ST or stable coronary artery disease and in healthy individuals. Increased levels of immature platelets and thrombopoietin were observed in patients with previous definite ST.     

Dynamic platelet adhesion in patients with an acute coronary syndrome: The effect of antiplatelet therapy

Platelet adhesion and aggregation are key functions leading to thrombus formation. The effect of aspirin, clopidogrel, and ticagrelor on platelet aggregation has been well established, however, there is limited data on the effect of these drugs on platelet adhesion. We therefore evaluated the effect of these drugs on platelet adhesion in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Citrated blood was collected from 50 ACS patients loaded with 325 mg of aspirin (baseline) and at 5 days after the administration of aspirin 100 mg/day and clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose, 75 mg/day) (n = 26) or ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg × 2/day) (n = 24). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to clopidogrel was estimated by vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay. Platelet adhesion to collagen was studied for 6 min under high shear stress and was evaluated using the time to platelet recruitment (TPR), the perimeter and average area of each adherent object, number of adherent objects, and the total percent of surface coverage (SC%). Six ACS patients exhibited HTPR to clopidogrel and excluded from the platelet adhesion assays. TPR and SC% values were similar among patient groups at baseline and controls. However, all other adhesion parameters were different in ACS patients, indicating the formation of more aggregates in regard to controls. At 5 days post-treatment with either clopidogrel or ticagrelor, the TPR values were increased and the SC% values were reduced to a similar extent compared with baseline. However, significant differences were observed in the ticagrelor group in the perimeter, number of adherent objects, and the average area of each adherent object indicating a more potent inhibition of adherence-induced platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. In conclusion, aspirin does not affect platelet adherence to collagen, whereas clopidogrel and ticagrelor inhibit to a similar extent dynamic platelet adhesion at 5 days post-treatment in ACS patients. However, ticagrelor exhibits a greater inhibitory effect on reducing adhesion-induced platelet aggregation.     

Predictors of antiplatelet response to prasugrel during maintenance treatment

Insufficient P2Y12 receptor inhibition is associated with a higher risk of thrombotic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The third generation thienopyridine prasugrel achieves stronger platelet inhibition as compared to its predecessor clopidogrel. Little is known about predictors of prasugrel drug responsiveness. The aim of this study was to explore predictors of prasugrel responsiveness in patients with a recent PCI on prasugrel maintenance dose (MD) treatment. In a registry of PCI-treated patients (n?=?163, recruited between August 2009 and March 2012) on prasugrel MD treatment, the ADP-induced platelet aggregation (PA) was assessed on a Multiplate analyzer. The mean (interquartile range (IQR)) ADP-induced PA on prasugrel MD treatment was 206 (138–331) AU?×?min. Obese (defined by a body mass index (BMI)?≥?30) patients (n?=?42) (303 [192–467] vs. 187 [117–305] AU?×?min, p?=?0.0001), patients (n?=?70) with a history of clopidogrel low responsiveness (278 [161–409] vs. 192 [126–282] AU?×?min, p?=?0.002) and patients (n?=?18) on a low (5?mg) prasugrel MD (483 [252–798] vs. 198 [133–313] AU?×?min; p?=?0.0001) showed higher PA values on prasugrel MD as compared to the remaining patients. In a multivariable linear regression model, the latter three variables were independently associated with higher PA values on prasugrel MD treatment. In summary response variability is observed in patients on prasugrel MD treatment. Obesity, a history of clopidogrel low responsiveness and a reduced prasugrel MD of 5?mg are independent predictors of an attenuated response to prasugrel treatment. Further studies are needed to explore clinical implications of this observation.